Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legislation draft1
Bill LSE #8
1 The report style was emulated from several federal laws and statutes, like
the Reorganization Plan N 3 of 1978 (Federal Emergency Management
Agency), the Central Intelligence Act of 1949 and the No Child Left Behinf
Act of 2001.
Juan Martn Fernndez UNI: jmf2244
Fact sheet
Support the Education Information Bill (#8)
Education statistics have not been available for many years in Argentina.
Lets put education on the spotlight.
Background
There is a widespread consensus about the efficacy of a good education
policy to promote economic growth, reduce inequality and encourage
citizenship. However, in Argentina, we do not really know where we stand in
regard to educational matters. There is no satisfactory information about
performance and there is almost no data at all regarding the resources of
the system. That prevents us from making decisions to improve such a
critical issue.
What is this proposal about?
The Education Information Bill promotes the establishment of an integral
education statistics system for Argentina. It also creates an agency in
charge of the policy, commanded by a council with minority party, teachers
and parents representation. The proposal includes:
1) Annual comprehensive assessment of every student in grades 3, 6, 9
and 12. Topics assessed include math, reading and science, among
others.
2) Full assessment of human, organizational and material resources
available at every school.
3) Open access to surveyed data within 6 months and detailed school
reports assessing performance and resources available.
4) Promotion of education research to find the most cost-effective practices
to improve results.
Why should you support the initiative?
1) The overall performance of our education system is not good. Argentina
ranked 59 out of 65 in Math in PISA survey 2012. Its position has been
deteriorating since the start of the test in 2003.
2) Before implementing solutions, we have to assess what the situation
is; not only to draw a baseline but also to identify the most cost-effective
solutions.
3) Current performance assessments are not satisfactory. Tests take place
just every 3 years in Argentina 2 and they only survey knowledge in
Maths, Reading and Science. Most OECD countries 3 and even Brasil,
Mexico and Chile have more comprehensive assessments 4.
2 DINIEE. 2016. Evaluacin de la calidad educativa. Accesed September 24,
2016. http://portales.educacion.gov.ar/diniece/evaluacion-de-la-calidadeducativa/
3 OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results: What Makes School Successful?. Paris:
OECD.
Juan Martn Fernndez UNI: jmf2244
4) The topics covered by current statistics are narrow. The only information
that is consistently gathered every year is the enrollment of students and
the size of the workforce. We hardly know the training of the teachers,
their motivation, the material condition of classroom and several other
key inputs for education. The last teacher census was completed in 2004
and the last school infrastructure census has 18 years old, way before
the disruption of ICTs into the classroom 5. Outputs indicators are not
heavily measured either. Argentina ranks 56 out in 65 regarding the
existence of internal or external evaluations and students feedback 6.
5) Most important, there is a lack of publicity of information. Argentina
ranked 59 out of 65 regarding whether or not the achievement data of
the school is made public7. This turns into very low accountability.
Parents have no grounds to make educators accountable through voice
or feet.
6) The Education Funding Act (n 26,075) requires the educational spending
to reach 6% of GDP. The recent change in base year in national accounts
means that spending has to increase massively to meet that
requirement. The current proposal is expected to cost $20 million a year,
just a 0.8% of those extra funds.
Addressing this issue is be the first step into start delivering a 21 st century
education that promotes growth and social inclusion in Argentina.
Supporters