r=

[ N X ( X) ]
x
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TOTAL

0.45
0.88
0.69
0.91
0.48
0.85
0.77
0.78
0.55
0.88
0.58
0.45
0.43
0.78
0.79
10.27

0.61
0.93
0.72
0.93
0.63
0.93
0.63
0.93
0.81
0.81
0.68
0.9
0.68
0.59
0.59
11.37

P-values
less than .005

There is a significant

0.005 abpve

There is no significant

x2

0.2025
0.7744
0.4761
0.8281
0.2304
0.7225
0.5929
0.6084
0.3025
0.7744
0.3364
0.2025
0.1849
0.6084
0.6241
7.4685

N XY ( X) ( Y)
X ( X) ]
y2

0.3721
0.8649
0.5184
0.8649
0.3969
0.8649
0.3969
0.8649
0.6561
0.6561
0.4624
0.81
0.4624
0.3481
0.3481
8.8871

[ N Y ( Y)]
xy

0.2745
0.8184
0.4968
0.8463
0.3024
0.7905
0.4851
0.7254
0.4455
0.7128
0.3944
0.405
0.2924
0.4602
0.4661
7.9158

Interpretation of Correlation Value (r

To interpret the correlation value,
0.00
0.21
0.41
0.61
0.81
1.00

0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.99
- Perfect

Negligible Correlat
Low Correlation
Moderate Correlati
High Correlation
Very High
Correlation

orrelation Value (r) I (Best & Khan, 1896):

correlation value, the classification is as follows:

Negligible Correlation
ow Correlation
Moderate Correlation
High Correlation
Very High
Correlation

Spearman Rank Correlation Coeffecient or Spea

6 D2

rho = 1 Scores

N3 - N

Ranks

10
8
10
8
10
8
6

10
8
8
10
10
6
10

Rx

TOTAL

Ry

D2

2.5

-0.5

0.25

2.5

-0.5

0.25

2.5

-0.5

0.25

2.5

2.5

6.25

5.5

-0.5

0.25

5.5

-0.5

0.25

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
7.5

Rati
ng
of
Judg
e1

Rati
ng
of
Judg
e2

10
8
10
8
10
8
6

10
8
8
10
10
6
10

ent or Spearman rho