Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering

Year 3 Design Project - H83DPX

Guidelines for Reporting and Assessment
INTRODUCTION
The Year 3 Design Project is the most challenging and extensive piece of project.
It makes demands not only on your individual technical ability, but also on your
ability to communicate and co-operate with other members in a project team, as
well as effective communication with other people outside the team through a
properly structured project report.
The design project report forms the only tangible result of the design teams
efforts and nowhere else does the level of coordination between team members
become more visible. Even well executed designs can be marred by poor report
presentation. To help avoid this pitfall, the following guidelines have been drawn
up as a basic standard to which you must work with. In addition, they provide a
framework which you can use to plan and monitor the progress of your project
team towards completing the project successfully by the report submission
deadline.
SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES:
AUTUMN SEMESTER
Week
Activity
3
Distribution of groups and titles
(29 September 2016 @ 2 5 pm)
Guest lecture process selection
(30 September 2016 @ 9 12 pm)
4
Guest lecture - Industrial expectation on PFD,
PID and Engineering Standards
(7 October 2016 @ 9 12 pm)
5
6
Submission of Process Flow Diagram (PFD)
(17 October 2016)
Oral evaluation on PFD
(21 October 2016 @ 9 12 pm)
7-8
9
Guest lecture mass balance revision
(11 November 2016 @ 9 12 pm)
10 - 11
12
Submission of preliminary report
(30 November 2016)
13
14
Feedback on Preliminary Report
(By appointment)

Person in charge
Denny Ng
(F1A11)
Denny Ng
(F1A15)
Chong Mei Fong
(F1A15)

Denny Ng
Design team

Nishanth
(F1A15)
Denny Ng

Supervisor

SPRING SEMESTER
Week
Activity
22
Briefing on requirement of Semester 2
(6 February 2017 @ 9 12 pm)
23
Surgery Session process simulation
(13 February 2017 @ 9 12 pm)
24
Guest lecture environmental
protection
(20 February 2017 @ 9 12 pm)
25
Guest lecture energy recovery and
utility design
(27 February 2017 @ 9 12 pm)
26
Guest lecture process safety
(6 March 2017 @ 9 12 pm)
27
Guest lecture process control
(13 March 2017 @ 10 12 pm)
28
Guest lecture economic analysis
(20 March 2017 @ 10 12 pm)
29 - 32
33
Final Report submission
(24 April 2017)
Examination Oral assessment
Week

Person in charge
Denny Ng
(F1A02)
Simulation expert team
(F2TCR1)
Vasanthi Sethu
(F1A02)
Svenja Hanson
(F1A02)
Lam Hon Loong
(F1A02)
Ong Sze Pheng
(F1A02)
Sivakumar
(F1A02)
Denny Ng
Design team

A flowsheet evaluation will be held between 28 October 2016 (venue will be

announced). An A1-size printed-copy of the Process Flow Diagram (PFD),
which consists of process equipment, should be submitted to the Faculty of
Engineering on 24 October 2016 (before 4.00 pm). In brief, a PFD shows the
arrangement of processes together with process streams. For more information
about the requirements of the PFD, please refer to Section IV.
An e-copy of the preliminary report that consists of design basis, process
background, mass and energy balances should be completed in Autumn
semester, and must be submitted via Moodle.Nottingham before 4.00 pm
based on the server time on 30 November 2016.
Meanwhile, the e-copy of the final report should not exceed a maximum of 150
pages. A maximum page limit of 200 pages is set for Appendices (detailed
HAZOP study should be included as appendices). The final report and all
appendices must be submitted as single PDF file via Moodle.Nottingham by
24 April 2017 (before 4.00 pm based on server time).
Since the Design Project is the single most important piece of work in the whole
undergraduate course, and it resembles the proposal submitted for bidding for a
project in a consultancy company, a penalty of 5% reduction per day
(including weekends) is STRICTLY implemented for late submission.
Please note that a submission at 4.01 pm on each specified deadline is
considered as late submission. Students who have submitted late by 5 days
(without a valid Extenuating Circumstances Form) are considered to
have failed the particular task.

ASSESSMENT OF DESIGN PROJECT

Topics
Group Contribution* Individual Contribution
Process Flow Diagram (PFD)
5%
Oral Assessment for PFD
5%
Preliminary Report
10%
Major Equipment
20%
General Aspects
10%
10%
Energy Recovery and Utility
Design
Environmental Protection
Process Safety
Process Operation and
Control
Economic Evaluation
List of Equipment & Schedule
5%
Piping & Instrument
10%
Diagram, General
Arrangement
Final Report
10%
Final Oral Assessment
15%
Total
55%
45%
*Peer evaluation will be conducted to ensure distribution of the marks is
based on the contribution of members.

FINAL REPORT STRUCTURE

In the industry a report of the kind you are to prepare would be accessed by a
wide variety of people ranging from engineering specialists (i.e., not only other
chemical engineers) right through to senior managers. Specialists may access
only data sheets and detailed calculations whilst senior managers may read only
the summary. With this in mind, your report should provide easy access to
information anywhere from the most specific to the most general levels of detail,
as necessary. A fairly standard format has evolved in industry to achieve this
aim with relatively minor variation between organisations. Within a single
organisation, however, the format is usually quite rigid, to ensure internal
uniformity for all such documents, and the following guidelines set out our own
In House report format.
The final report must be structured on a sectional basis as follows:
Sections

I
II
III
IV
V

Chapters
Title Page
Contents
Extended Summary
Design Basis
Process Background
Mass and Energy Balances
Energy Recovery and Utility
Balances
Equipment Design
Environmental Protection
Process Safety
Process Operation and Control
Process Economic Analysis

VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Appendices
AI
Literature References
AII
Record Cards
AIII
Specialised Technical Data Used
for Design
AIV
Detailed Design Calculations
etc.
AV
Detailed HAZOP Study

Submission

Semester

Autumn
Group

Individual
Spring
Group

Group

Spring

SECTION CONTENTS
Each section must begin with a title page listing those who have contributed to
the material it contains. The material itself should be arranged in sub-sections
numbered on a decimal basis (e.g., IX.3 Emergency Plant Shut-down
Procedure). Pages should be numbered within sub-sections, each page carrying
its unique number and authors initials in the top right-hand corner (i.e.,
Section.Sub-section.Page, for example IX.3.4). The expected content for each of
the main report Section (I-XI) is as follows:

Title Page: Report title, code number/letter, date of submission, authors,

academic and industrial supervisors.
Format:
Page Size
Margins (Top, Left, Bottom and Right)
Font
Font Size
Line Spacing

A4
2.54 cm
Verdana
11 pt
Single

Contents: List section and sub-section headings followed by page number.

Section I.

Extended Summary: Comprises three sections:

(I.1)

Executive Summary (300 words max): a normal summary

commenting on all the main aspects of the project. The most
important elements will be the particular features of the process
selected, details of any major safety or environmental issues, and
the results of the process economic analysis.
(I.2) Appraisal of Group Design (500 words max): view of the whole
design group on their work in the main sections including features
such as, but not limited to:
well executed aspects of the design
difficult aspects of the design and how these were overcome
areas of uncertainty remaining in the design
how the design might be improved.
(I.3.1 onwards) Appraisal of Individual Design (300 words max each):
view by each student of their own work on detailed design including
those aspects listed in (I.2).
Section II. Design Basis: A statement on the requirements to be met by the
plant itself (e.g., capacity, feed/product/utility specifications etc.) and by the
design chosen (e.g., low operating or capital cost, plant lifetime, return on
capital, design codes etc.). Design criteria having a major influence on the
design must be highlighted. Some of this information (e.g., operating/capital
cost, return on capital, etc.) will only become certain upon completion of the
detailed design and hence, this chapter needs to be updated towards the end of
the project.
Section III. Process Background: Information to be included here comprises:
Production Overview
Application and Uses
Market Survey
Physical and Chemical Properties
Review of Alternative Processes
Economic Potential Evaluation
Process Selection
Site Study
Plant Layout

Give a brief review of global and local markets for the product including its main
uses. The production capacity, based on the product growth rate, and the site
location should also be covered within the scope set in your project assignment.
Review of alternative processes should be conducted based on available patent,
journal, handbooks, etc. A concise description is needed for all alternative
processes considered, including state-of-the-art technologies (e.g., patented
processes). The selected process route must be justified on a range of
considerations including safety, environmental impact, economics (via economic
potential evaluation), raw material supply and sustainability.
A site study to determine the location of the site should be conducted. Besides,
plant layout of the designed plant should be provided in this section.
Section IV. Mass and Energy Balances: This section must comprise:
Process Flow Diagram (PFD)
Process description
Mass Balance
Energy Balance
The PFD shows the arrangement of the processes with the interconnecting
streams. In the PFD, equipment are to be represented using standard symbols
and identified by individual numbers (as listed in Section VI). All process
streams should carry a stream index number corresponding with entries in the
mass balance. All streams and equipment should be labelled with their design
temperatures and pressures. It is strongly recommended that the PFD is
produced using AUTOCAD. Note that an A1-size soft copy of the finalised PFD is
required to be submitted together with the final report.
The mass balance should contain a componential breakdown (based on
equipment) and total for each process stream (mass balance check) using its
stream index number which cross-references with the PFD. The temperature and
pressure of each stream must also be quoted. The basis for the mass balance
must be clearly stated in a table form (i.e. amount of raw material, specification
of raw materials used, etc.). In addition, assumptions, such as no heat loss to
the environment, no leakages, consistent raw material quality, etc., should be
listed. A footnote should also be given to indicate the location of the underlying
detailed calculations (presented in Appendix AI or beyond). Sample of mass
balance sheet is given in Attachment A.
An energy balance is to be presented for the whole plant based on energy flows
for each equipment item in the PFD. Basis of calculation (e.g., constant for heat
capacity, vaporisation, etc.) and assumptions should be provided. Reference
should be made to the underlying detailed calculations presented in Appendix AI
or beyond.
To follow the design practise in the industry, a commercial simulation software
(such as Aspen HYSYS, Aspen Plus, DESIGN II for Windows, SuperPro Designer
and UniSim Design) should be used to perform mass and energy balances of the
process. Based on the simulation results, comparison between manual and

simulation results should be provided. Note that clear justifications on the

selection of fluid package and process equipment model should be discussed in
detailed. Without clear justifications, the simulated result will not be accepted.
In the case where large deviation between the results is observed, possible
reasons need to be identified and discussed. Finally, concluding remarks on the
design capacity and results (either manual or simulation) that are used for
subsequent calculation for both mass and energy balances should be provided.
Section V. Energy Recovery and Utility Balances:
For energy intensive processes, a heat recovery system may be designed using
process integration techniques whereby a heat exchanger network could be
designed to achieve the maximum energy recovery targets, and Grand
Composite Curves (GCC) may be utilised to decide the level of hot and cold
utilities required.
Based on the requirement of the process, the selected and usage of utilities
(e.g., steam, cooling water, electricity, fuel (oil or gas), inert gas etc.) must be
listed and consistent with the mass balance. Detailed utility balances for the
entire plant should be included in this section. In more complicated cases, steam
distribution network (with steam at various conditions) is required.
Based on the site selection, the traffic of utilities (e.g., water, electricity, etc.)
should be listed and the total cost of utilities should be reported in Section X Process Economic Analysis.
Section VI. Equipment Design: This section summarises the design of
equipment items appearing in the PFD and must comprise:
Hydraulic design
List of Equipment and Schedule
Equipment Specification sheets
In the hydraulic design, equipment layout, General Arrangement (GA) diagram
and hydraulic calculations should be included. A general arrangement (GA)
diagram should use to size and design the transfer units (e.g., pumps and
compressors). With GA, the pressure losses across the pipe lines can be taken
into consideration.
The List of Equipment and Schedule (see Attachments B-I and B-II)
includes all process and auxiliary equipment items within battery limit and listed
on the PFD (e.g., heat exchangers, pumps, compressors). The equipment is
then sub-divided into major and auxiliary equipment. Major equipment is the
main process unit that used in process operation, e.g., distillation column,
reactor, etc. The mechanical and civil works of the major equipment should be
excluded in the report. Meanwhile, all the auxiliary equipment should involve
selection of materials, sizing and schedule of equipment as shown in Attachment
B II. However, no detail drawing is needed. Each equipment item has an
identification code number, a name and a Lead Engineer responsible for its
design, and these should be identified accordingly (see Attachment B-I). List
the equipment items in service groups (e.g., all heat exchangers grouped
together with suffix E, all towers grouped together with suffix T, etc.) and

sequence them within a group in order of ascending item number. Item numbers
normally increase when moving from the feed section to the product section
throughout the PFD.
The list of equipment is an important document in ensuring no item is
overlooked in preparing the PFD, plot plan or equipment specifications or in
compiling capital cost data.
For every item in the list of equipment, an equipment specification sheet
(sometimes called a data-sheet) must be presented in the same sequence as the
one presented in the equipment list. All equipment specifications must carry the
following information:
Item Code Number
Item Name (plus any further details required for clarity)
Authors Name
Reference by page number to supporting calculations
Equipment specifications may be prepared at three alternative levels of detail,
according to Attachment C. The information contained must be adequate for
the capital cost of the item to be estimated. As a guide, some specific examples
are given through Attachments D, E and F, and these are referred to below.
First, a thorough chemical engineering design of most of the equipment
involved can be attempted (e.g., reactors, towers, drums, heat exchangers etc.)
but some more specialised items (e.g. those involving motor drives such as
pumps and compressors) require thorough design by an equipment vendor. It is
then your job to provide the vendor with adequate information to arrive at a
suitable design in the form of a load-sheet (see Attachment D-II, an example
for a compressor).
Secondly, in the majority of cases where a thorough chemical engineering
design is possible, you may choose one of two levels of detail:
i)

PRELIMINARY - Involves the use of shortcut calculations, rules of thumb,

etc. to obtain an equipment design that is adequate for outline cost
estimation and plot plan preparation. For instance, for a heat exchanger,
you would choose a typical overall heat transfer coefficient for the service to
estimate the surface area. In the case of a distillation column, you would
use a quick estimating technique based upon vapour-liquid flowrate, to set
the column diameter and typical tray spacing, tray efficiency, and an
estimated number of ideal trays to set the vessels tangent to tangent
length. This level of design would allow you to complete the front page
specification sheet for either item (see Attachments E-I for a gasifier or FI for a heat exchanger).

ii)

DETAILED - In this case you will progress the design further with more
detail and precision. For a heat exchanger, instead of choosing a typical
heat transfer coefficient, you will calculate it by taking into account
flowrates, tube size and arrangement, baffle spacing etc. For the column,
instead of using a quick sizing method, you would develop a rigorous

method and include proper tray design, give detailed consideration to

arrangements for handling feed entry, reboiler return and the internal liquid
and vapour flows, as well as preliminary design of condenser and reboiler.
Obviously this requires supplementary data-sheets such as Attachments
E-II and F-II.
Note: In practice all equipment specifications would be completed at the
detailed level. We accept you may not be able to perform a detailed design
for every item of equipment, due to limited time. Hence, each student is
expected to design in detail one major piece of equipment only.
Heat exchanger data-sheets (e.g. Attachments F-I and F-II) are suitable for
most services and you may use these as templates. Vessels such as reactors and
towers all tend to be different and in general you will need to provide your own
versions equivalent to Attachments E-I, E-II etc. Vessel sketches need not be
drawn exactly to scale but should be clearly dimensioned. Whether at
preliminary or detailed level, a vessel sketch must be included in each
equipment specification. The design team should agree and use a set format for
load-sheets and other data-sheets where appropriate.
Section VII.

Environmental Protection:

This section should summarise how all forms of discharge from the plant into the
environment (air, water and land), arising either continuously or intermittently,
will be handled. For continuous releases, e.g., wastewater, sour gas, sludge,
etc., attention should be paid to the steady discharge rate; whilst for
intermittent releases, e.g., arising from emergency pressure relief, plant shutdown, spent catalyst, etc., the total quantity is important. The relative severity
of each discharge should be identified. Systems for handling or treatment should
be identified and discussed thoroughly for any discharge that is not
in
compliance with the Malaysian Environmental Quality Act (EQA) 1974 (USEPA
guidelines should be used for toxic chemical emissions). The scope of some
projects may also include design of equipment items for effluent abatement and
waste or wastewater pollution prevention schemes.
Section VIII.

Process Safety:

It is of the utmost importance to design a plant that is safe and easy to operate.
The plant safety study should be based on the PFD and should include a coarse
scale hazard analysis for the complete plant, a detailed Bow-tie diagramme and
HAZOP study of a plant sub-section (done as a group) and a statement of how
you propose to deal with the hazards identified through equipment design and
operating procedures.
A plant-wide HAZOP study and bow tie diagram for major equipment are
required to enable the report on hazard assessment, suggestion of actions/
safety barriers and meaningful recommendation. Those recommendations should
be reflected in the piping and instrument diagram (P&ID).
Note that only the summary of HAZOP study is included in the main report.
Meanwhile, the detailed HAZOP study and all other supporting details are
included in an appendix (e.g. appropriate material safety data sheets (MSDS),

safe procedures for handling and processing hazardous materials, etc.).

Emergency operating procedures should be developed to cope with potential
hazards and failures and cross referencing to process control and the plant
safety study is likely.
Section IX. Process Operation and Control:
A good standard operating procedures (SOP) manual and process control are
crucial in order to ensure safe plant operation, maintain consistent product
quality, and enable smooth transition. Therefore, a SOP manual should clearly
define the procedures for plant start-up, normal operation, abnormal/emergency
operation, and plant shut-down. It should list the essential instructions, step-bystep, on how to complete a task and how to handle a specific situation when it
arises in the equipment as well as the plant. On top of that, automatic plant
control in modern industrial operation is extensively important. It provides
continuous monitoring of an operation and enables a small number of operating
personnel to operate a complex process from a central control room. Before
attempting to control a process, it is necessary to understand how the process
works and what it does. All the operating parameters, hazardous conditions,
measurable (e.g., temperature, pressure, flow rate, pH, etc.) and points of
measurement must be identified for its control. Appropriate measurement
methods, signal types (e.g., electrical, pneumatic, etc.) and control methods
should be selected to ensure the most accurate, stable, and cost-effective
control system is acquired. Furthermore, control strategy (e.g., feedfoward,
feedback, etc.) must be carefully selected and control limits should be defined
based on the specific design and safety parameters of the process. The full
control scheme shall be clearly presented in P&ID. Besides, control strategy of
individual equipment should also be clearly discuss and presented as shown in
Attachment G.
Section X. Process Economic Analysis:
This should include a full analysis of operating and capital costs and a discussion
of the process economics. Plant items capital costs will follow from the
equipment specifications in Section VI. Various economic performance of the
plant should also be carried out, and reported in payback period, cash flow
analysis, etc.
Appendix AI onwards: Free use of AI and subsequent appendices should be
made to present supporting detail. This will mainly comprise detailed
calculations, especially those underlying the equipment designs, and their
preparation will most likely be undertaken by individual authors. The objective
is to allow the procedures and methods chosen and used by the designer to be
validated both technically and numerically. Try to be concise. For repetitive or
iterative calculations you should provide one sample calculation and summarise
or tabulate the main outcome. Where computer programs have been used, the
results should be summarised (using tables or graphs) and the programs
properly documented. Operation of a program should be described with
reference to a single code listing and wholesale inclusion of printer output should
be avoided. See also Note 10 on presentation.

Note: That in all parts of the report, no credit will be given for the
inclusion of marginally relevant material downloaded from the web. If
no reference as to the original source is cited this will be treated as
plagiarism.

ATTACHMENT A
Primary Reformer (RE-100)
S5
S6

RE-100
S7

Type:
Objective:
Catalyst:
Pressure:
Temperature:

Adiabatic Reformer Reactor

In this reactor, any hydrocarbon higher than methane will
react with steam and form a mixture of methane, carbon
oxides and hydrogen.
XXXXXXX
XX bar
XX oC

Temperature (oC)

S5
XXX

S6
XXX

S7
XXX

Pressure (bar)

XX

XX

XX

Operating Conditions

Component

Inlet Streams
S5
S6
Molar
Molar
Flowrate
Flowrate
(kmol/h)
(kmol/h)

Outlet Streams
S7
Molar Flowrate
(kmol/h)

xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
Total
Note: Values of C1 and C2 must be similar within 5% error.

Mass Balance
In
Out
Mass
Mass
Flowrate Flowrate
(kg/h)
(kg/h)

C1

C2

Comparison Table for Manual Mass Balance Results with Process

Simulation Results
Stream
1
2
3
..
..
..

Simulation Result
(kg/h)

Manual Calculation
(kg/h)

% Error

ATTACHMENT B-I
List of Equipment
Compressors

Lead Engineer

101 C

Feed Compressor

A N Other

101 CT

Steam Turbine Drive for 101-C

A Student

101 CE

Surface Condenser for 101-C

Etc..

101 E

Compressor Kick-Back Cooler

..

102 E

Feed Preheater

..

103 E

Reactor Feed/Effluent Interchanger

..

104 E

LP Steam Boiler

..

101 D

Compressor Suction KO Drum

..

102 D

Product Separation Drum

..

Reformer

..

101 P

Condensate Recycle Pump

..

101 PM

Motor Drive for 101-P

..

102 P

Boiler Feed Water Pump

..

102 PS

Stand-by for 102-P

..

102 PM

Motor Drive for 102-P

..

102 PSM

Motor Drive for 102-PS

..

101 T

Product Distillation Tower

..

102 T

H2S Absorber

..

Exchangers

Drums

Furnaces
101 F
Pumps

Towers

ATTACHMENT B-II
Schedule of Equipment
Pump
Equipment
Number
E.g.
101 P

Media
Characteristic

Operating
Condition

Type

Suction
Condition*

Discharge
Head*

Pump
specification

Piping*

Liquid Type:
Reaction
mixture
Condition:
Flowable
Viscosity: xxx
c.p.
Solid Size: 5
m
Solid
concentration:
10% max
pH: 4
S.G.: 1.01

Temperature
: 30oC
Flowrate:
10m3/hr
Pressure:
1bar

Screw/Positive
Displacement
(PD)

NPSHA: 4.7m
NPSHR:2.0m
NPSH:2.7m
(ok)

Head loss:
0.05m
HA: 0.1m

Power: 5kW
Wettable part:
Mild Steel

Material: PE
80/PN10
Flange:
DIN100/DN16

NPSHA: Net Positive Suction Head Available

NPSHR: Net Positive Suction Head Required
*Requires schematic diagram as in shown in Figure B1 for calculation. The diagram should consist of the suction and
discharge sections of the pump.
Equipment to be listed should consist of pumps, compressor, blower and any other transfer equipment.

Figure B1: Example of schematic diagram (Suction)

ATTACHMENT C

EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN DECISION TREE

Equipment
Specification

Thorough
Design
Possible

Preliminary
Design

Prepare FrontPage
Specification

Thorough
Design Not
Possible

Detailed
Design

Prepare
Front-Page
Specification
Plus Supplementary
Data-Sheets

Prepare
Loadsheet

ATTACHMENT D
COMPRESSOR LOAD-SHEET
Item Name
Supporting Calcs. On page
Compressor Type
Spared by
Stage No.
Process Material
MW
Cp
Cp/Cv
Temperature
Suction
Pressure
Z
Discharge Pressure
kmol/h
Normal capacity
kg/h
Actual m3/h
kmol/h
Maximum capacity
kg/h
Actual m3/h
Estimated Efficiency Adiabatic/Polytropic
Estimated Stage Power
Total Power
Notes

Item No.
Author
Driver
1

ATTACHMENT E-I

Note: This figure is only an example. A direct copy in a design report

will be treated as plagiarism.

ATTACHMENT E-II

Note: This figure is only an example. A direct copy in a design report

will be treated as plagiarism.

ATTACHMENT E-III

Note: This figure is only an example. A direct copy in a design report

will be treated as plagiarism.

ATTACHMENT F-I
HEAT EXCHANGER SPECIFICATION
Item Name
Total Surface Area
No. of Shells Used
Surface Area per Shell

Item No.
Author
Supporting Calcs. on Page

m2
m2
Performance of One Shell

Fluid Name
Allocation
IN
Fluid Flow,

Shell-Side
OUT

IN

Tube-Side
OUT

Total
kg/h
Vapour
Liquid
Steam
Water
Non-Condensables
Discharge Pressure

o
Temperature
C
Operating Pressure
bar
g
Design Pressure
bar
g
o
Design Temp
C
Pressure Drop
Allow./Calc.
bar
Fouling Resistance
Heat Transfer Coefficient
Est./Calc.
o
C
Mean Temperature Difference (corrected)
o
C
Heat Transfer Duty per Shell
kW
Materials of Construction, Tubes
Channel/Bonnet
Shell

kW/m2

/continued

ATTACHMENT F-II

HEAT EXCHANGER SPECIFICATION (CONTD.)

Construction of one Shell
Type (TEMA Nomenclature)
No. of Tubes
Tube: OD
, ID
Tube Arrangement
Shell: OD
, ID
Baffles-Cross: Type
No.
Baffles-Longitudinal
Sketch (Bundle/Nozzle Orientation)

Remarks

Item No.
Page 2

Horizontal/Vertical Shell
No. of Tube Passes
, Length
, Tube-Tube Pitch
No. of Shell Passes
, % Cut
, Spacing
Design Code

ATTACHMENT G
Control System for Reactor R-3
Discussion on control philosophy and strategy of Reactor R-3 should be included.
Control and manipulated variables, disturbances, typle of controller as well as
set point should be summarised in table. Figure which shows the process unit
with control loops and appropriate instrument should be provided.
Table G.1: Control variables for Reactor R-3
Disturbances
Manipulated
Types of
variables
controller

Control
variable

Set point

TAH

TI
FT

FIC

TIC

TAL

S4
cooling water
inlet

n-Butane Reactor
R3

cooling water
outlet

S5

Reactor, R3
for ISOBUTYLENE PLANT
ISOBUTYLENE PLANT

DWG. NO.
R3-1

Date
FEBUARY 05, 2002

DWG:
Samilas Abd. Razak

DSN:
Samilas Abd. Razak

Figure G.1: Control System for Reactor R-3