Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 10 April 2015
Received in revised form 27 August 2015
Accepted 3 September 2015
Available online 21 September 2015
Keywords:
Pilocarpus pennatifolius Lem.
HPLCDADESI/MSn
Phenolic compounds
Authenticity
Enzyme inhibition
a b s t r a c t
Pilocarpus pennatifolius Lem. is a neotropical species with economic importance, whose phenolic prole
is poorly described. A comparative HPLCDADESI/MSn analysis between herbal teas prepared from a
commercial sample (CS) and an authenticated one (BGS) was carried out. From a qualitative point of view,
45 compounds were identied, 42 being reported for the rst time in Pilocarpus genus; the samples only
shared the presence of 18 compounds. From a quantitative perspective, BGS contained higher amounts
of phenolics than CS (44.94 and 37.20 mg/g extract d.w., respectively) and both samples exhibited
different major compounds, namely hesperetin-7-O-rutinoside (BGS) and 6-methoxy-quercetin-3-Orobinobioside (CS). Despite being one of the markers of Pilocarpus genus and previously described in
this species, pilocarpine was not found in none of the samples.
This is also the rst report on the inhibition of enzymes implicated in Alzheimers disease
(cholinesterases) and diabetes mellitus type II (-glucosidase) by P. pilocarpus. BGS and CS were more
effective against -glucosidase, displaying IC50 values of 604.34 g/mL (BGS) and 573.48 g/mL (CS).
These results can provide a basis of future studies on the application of these herbal teas as nutraceutical
ingredients.
2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Rutaceae encompasses many members of economic importance, including species of different genera: Citrus, Pilocarpus,
Boronia, Choisya, Poncirus, and Skimmia (Chase et al., 1999). Pilocarpus pennatifolius Lem. is a neotropical medicinal plant native to
South America (Sawaya et al., 2011). Its main commercial value
relies on the imidazole alkaloids found only in Pilocarpus genus,
such as pilocarpine. This alkaloid possesses CNS activity and is
used for the treatment of glaucoma and xerostomy (Santos and
Moreno, 2004). Nonetheless, this plant is still traded to treat other
illnesses, since its dried leaves possess gastrostimulant, peristaltic
and secretagogue activities, which are suitable for the treatment of
392
2.3. Extraction
Herbal teas were prepared by mixing 3 g of plant material with
500 mL of distilled water. The extraction was performed at 100 C,
during 20 min. The extracts were then ltered under reduced pressure and submitted to freeze drying. Extraction yields for CS and
BGS were 16.3 and 28.2%, respectively.
2.4. HPLCDADESI/MSn qualitative analyses
Chromatographic analyses were carried out on a Kinetex column (5 m, C18, 100 A, 150 4.6 mm; Phenomenex, Maccleseld,
UK). The mobile phase consisted of two solvents: formic acid
in water (1%) (A) and acetonitrile (B), starting with 15% B and
using a gradient to obtain 20% B at 25 min and 70% B at 27 min.
The ow rate was 800 L/min, and the injection volume was
5 L. Spectral data from all peaks were accumulated in the range
of 240400 nm, and chromatograms were recorded at 340 and
280 nm. The HPLCDADESI/MSn analyses were carried out in an
Agilent HPLC 1200 series equipped with a diode array detector
and mass detector in series (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn,
Germany). The HPLC consisted of a binary pump (model G1376A),
an autosampler (model G1377A) refrigerated at 4 C (G1330B),
a degasser (model G1379B), and a diode array detector (model
G1315D). The HPLC system was controlled by ChemStation software (Agilent, v. B.01.03-SR2). The mass detector was a Bruker ion
trap spectrometer (model HCT Ultra) equipped with an electrospray ionisation interface and was controlled by LCMSD software
(Agilent, v. 6.1). The ionisation conditions were adjusted at 350 C
and 4.0 kV for capillary temperature and voltage, respectively. The
nebulizer pressure and ow rate of nitrogen were 65.0 psi and
11 L/min, respectively. The full scan mass covered the range from
m/z 100 up to m/z 1200. Collision-induced fragmentation experiments were performed in the ion trap using helium as the collision
gas, with voltage ramping cycles from 0.3 up to 2 V. Mass spectrometry data were acquired in the negative ionisation mode. MS2 was
carried out in the automatic mode on the more abundant fragment
ion in MS.
Compounds were numbered following the order of elution in
Fig. 1, without taking into account their presence or absence in
each of the extracts. Table 1 shows the fragmentation pattern of
the identied phenolic acid derivatives. Moreover, in Table 2, compounds were grouped by their similarities in terms of glycosylation
patterns ((2-rhamnosyl) rutinosides, (rhamnosyl) hexosides and
mono-glycosides).
393
Fig. 1. HPLC phenolic prole of BGS and CS of Pilocarpus pennatifolius (340 nm). Peaks: 110 (see Table 1); 1145 (see Table 2).
Table 1
Rt, UV and MS: [MH] and MS2 [MH] data of phenolic acids from BGS and CS.a
Compounds
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Rt (min)
UV (nm)
[MH] , m/z
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.5
3.6
3.9
4.2
4.4
4.8
6.9
298sh, 312
298sh, 312
298sh, 312
298sh, 312
300sh, 326
300sh, 326
298sh, 312
298sh, 312
300sh, 326
300sh, 324
355
355
355
355
385
385
355
355
385
397
Main observed fragments. Other ions were found but they have not been included.
in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 130 L of phosphate buffer and 50 L of the extract or buffer (negative control).
The reaction was initiated by adding 20 L of the enzyme solution
(0.28 U/mL). The plates were incubated at 37 C for 10 min. The rate
of release of 4-nitrophenol from PNP-G at 405 nm was measured
in a Multiskan Ascent plate reader (Thermo Electron Corporation)
from T = 0 min to T = 10 min. Acarbose was taken as positive control.
2.8. Inhibition of cholinesterases
AChE and BuChE were inhibited according to a methodology
described before (Vinholes et al., 2011). Briey, 25 L of extract
dissolved in 50 mM TrisHCl buffer (buffer A, pH 8) or just buffer
(negative control) were added to each well, together with 25 L
of ATCI or of BTCI (15 mM), 125 L of DTNB and 50 L of buffer
B (50 mM TrisHCl, with 0.1% BSA, pH 8). The absorbance was
measured at 405 nm in a Multiskan Ascent plate reader (Thermo
Electron Corporation). The rates of reactions were calculated after
addition of 25 L of AChE (0.44 U/mL in buffer B) or of BuChE
(0.1 U/mL in buffer B). Galantamine was used as positive control.
2.9. Statistical analysis
The phenolic content of both extracts was compared using
unpaired t-test (GraphPad Prism 6 Software, Inc., San Diego, CA,
USA). For the biological activities, six different concentrations of
each extract were tested. Analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA,
post-test Bonferroni) was carried out to compare IC50 and IC25 values of the extracts with those of the positive controls. Differences
at p < 0.05 were considered statistically signicant (p > 0.05n.s.;
p < 0.05*; p < 0.01**; p < 0.001***; p < 0.0001****).
394
Table 2
Rt, UV and MS: [MH] and MS2 [MH] data of avonoids from BGS and CS.a
Compoundsb
Rt (min)
UV (nm)
[MH] , m/z
Querct-3-O-(2-rhmn) rut
Kaempf-3-O-(2-rhmn) rut
6-OMe-Isorhmn-3-O-(2-rhmn) rut
Isorhmn-3-O-(2-rhmn) rut
7.2
9.5
10.8
10.9
Flavonoid-3-O-(2-rhamnosyl) rutinosides
256, 267sh, 302sh, 356
755
739
267, 293sh, 348
c
799
769
255, 266sh, 300sh, 354
12
16
17
18
19
25
26
27
30
33
34
36
38
39
40
41
Querct-3-O-(2-rhmn) glc
Querct-3-O-rut
6-OMe-Querct-3-O-rob
6-OMe-Querct-3-O-rut
Kaempf-3-O-(2-rhmn) glc
Isorhmn-3-O-rob
Kaempf-3-O-rut
6-OMe-Kaempf-3-O-rut
Isorhmn-3-O-rut
Apig-7-O-rut
6-OMe-Isorhmn-3-O-rob
Hespt-7-O-rut
Chrys-7-O-rob
6-OMe-Apig-7-O-rut
Chrys-7-O-rut
6-OMe-Isorhmn-3-O-rut
9.2
11.1
11.6
12.1
12.4
13.8
14.1
15.2
17.0
17.7
17.9
18.5
19.3
20.4
21.2
21.8
Flavonoid-O-(rhamnosyl) hexosides
256, 267sh, 300sh, 355
609
609
256, 266sh, 300sh, 354
258, 270sh, 352
639
258, 270sh, 346
639
267, 290sh, 345
593
255, 268sh, 348
623
593
266, 295sh, 345
c
623
255, 266sh, 300sh, 352
623
268, 338
577
c
653
284, 332
609
250, 266, 290sh, 345
607
273, 335
607
252, 266, 292sh, 346
607
c
653
20
21
22
23
24
28
29
31
32
35
37
42
43
44
45
Querct-3-O-gal
6-OMe-Querct-3-O-gal
Kaempf-3-O-gal
Querct-3-O-glc
6-OMe-Querct-3-O-glc
6-OMe-Kaempf-3-O-gal
Kaempf-3-O-glc
6-OMe-Querct-3-O-pent
6-OMe-Kaempf-3-O-glc
6-OMe-Isorhmn-3-O-glc
Isorhmn-3-O-glc
6-OMe-Apig-7-O-gal
6-OMe-Apig-7-O-glc
Chrys-7-O-glc
6-OMe-Chrys-7-O-glc
12.6
12.9
13.0
13.4
13.7
15.3
16.6
17.2
17.3
18.0
18.9
21.8
22.4
24.1
24.3
Flavonoid-O-monoglycosides
c
463
258, 270sh, 348
493
447
c
256, 266sh, 354
463
258, 268sh, 346
493
c
477
c
447
c
463
c
477
507
c
c
477
c
461
272, 334
461
461
c
c
491
15
146
(146 + 18)
(146 + 120)
[AglcH/2H]
[AglcH-15]
784(30)
754(7)
609(20)
593(13)
653(5)
623(20)
591(25)
575(47)
635(35)
605(37)
489(45)
473(12)
533(10)
503(15)
300(100)
285(100)
345(100)
315(100)
330(30)
300(30)
463(5)
445(10)
624(10)
624(5)
447(15)
300(25)
638(10)
478(3)
478(4)
462(10)
448(7)
462(25)
492(20)
446(90)
446(60)
476(100)
429(70)
300(100)
301(100)
331(100)
331(100)
284(100)
315(100)
285(100)
315(100)
315(100)
269(100)
345(100)
301(100)
299(100)
299(100)
299(100)
345(100)
301(100)
331(100)
285(100)
301(100)
331(100)
315(100)
285(100)
331(100)
315(100)
345(100)
315(100)
299(100)
299(100)
299(100)
329(80)
316(40)
316(50)
300(40)
300(60)
300(23)
330(50)
284(30)
284(45)
284(55)
330(20)
316(30)
316(20)
300(70)
316(20)
300(60)
330(30)
284(50)
284(90)
284(10)
314(70)
Main observed fragments. Other ions were found but they have not been included.
b
Querct: quercetin; Kaempf: kaempferol; Isorhmn: isorhamnetin; Apig: apigenin; Chrys: chrysoeriol; Hespt: hesperetin; hex: hexoside; rhmn: rhamnoside; glc: glucoside; gal: galactoside; pent: pentoside; rut: rutinoside;
rob: robinobioside.
c
Coelutes with other compounds or are in trace amounts and its spectrum cannot be properly observed.
11
13
14
15
395
Table 3
Regression equations, R2 , limits of quantication and limits of detection of the phenolic compounds.
Compoundsa
Regression equation
5-CQA
Sinapic acid
Querct-3-O-rut
Querct-3-O-gal
Querct-3-O-glc
Hespt-7-O-rut
Kaempf-3-O-rut
Kaempf-3-O-glc
Apig-7-O-neoh
Apig-7-O-glc
Isorhmn-3-O-rut
Isorhmn-3-O-glc
Chrys
4.54 10 x + 3.28 10
1.03 109 x + 9.37 105
3.47 108 x 8.68 105
4.65 108 x 2.22 104
4.78 108 x 7.05 105
3.25 108 x + 8.66 105
3.69 108 x + 1.14 106
4.23 108 x + 6.14 105
3.69 108 x 2.55 106
5.48 108 x 2.06 106
3.84 108 x 5.80 105
4.62 108 x + 4.00 105
5.77 108 x + 2.18 106
8
R2
5
0.9969
0.9971
0.9992
0.9972
0.9991
0.9902
0.9955
0.9976
0.9930
0.9977
0.9996
0.9990
0.9865
7.95 10 3.95 10
6.20 103 1.24 101
3.20 103 4.86 101
4.10 103 8.20 102
6.05 103 2.41 101
4.90 103 2.00 101
3.53 103 2.22 101
1.78 103 1.78 101
6.30 103 6.30 101
2.68 103 2.68 101
1.85 103 4.10 101
6.50 103 6.50 101
2.00 103 2.00 101
LODb (mg/mL)
4
1.85 10
1.33 103
6.75 104
5.31 104
1.34 104
1.10 103
3.20 104
7.91 105
1.45 103
9.63 105
2.88 104
2.10 103
5.69 104
LOQc (mg/mL)
5.61 104
4.04 103
2.04 103
1.61 103
4.07 104
3.35 103
9.70 104
2.40 104
4.39 103
2.92 104
8.73 104
6.36 103
1.73 103
a
5-CQA: 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid; Querct: quercetin; Kaempf: kaempferol; Isorhmn: isorhamnetin; Apig: apigenin; Chrys: chrysoeriol; Hespt: hesperetin; glc: glucoside;
gal: galactoside; rut: rutinoside; neoh: neohesperidoside.
b
LODlimit of detection.
c
LOQlimit of quantication.
3.1.2. Flavonoid-O-monoglycosides
Excepting compound 31, the other compounds from this group
(2024, 28, 29, 32, 35, 37 and 4245) presented the loss of 162 amu
(hexosyl radical) in their MS fragmentation, to give place to the
deprotonated ion of the aglycone, which, excepting that of compound 45, was the base peak (Table 2). Thus, these compounds are
avonoid-monohexosides.
The isomeric compounds 20 and 23 presented quercetin as aglycone ([MH] , m/z 301) and, due to their RP chromatographic
mobility (Schieber et al., 2002), can be labelled as quercetin3-O-galactoside (20) and quercetin-3-O-glucoside (23). Similarly,
compounds 22 and 29 can be kaempferol-3-O-galactoside (22) and
kaempferol-3-O-glucoside (29) (Table 2).
The deprotonated aglycone of the isomeric compounds 28, 32 and 37 at m/z 315 indicated that they are
tetrahydroxy-methoxy-avones, which could be isorhamnetin
(3,5,7,4 -tetrahydroxy-3 -methoxy-avone)
or
6/8-methoxykaempferol (3,5,7,4 -tetrahydroxy-6/8-methoxy-avone). It was
not possible to observe the UV spectrum of these and other
compounds because some co-elute and others were present
in trace amounts, precluding their identication. Nonetheless,
abundant ions [Aglycone-H-15] , as well as [(MH)-15] , were
observed in the MS of compounds 28 and 32, which were absent in
compound 37, this last compound being probably an isorhamnetin
derivative, namely isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside. As already indicated, the avonoids isolated from P. trachylophylus by Bertrand
et al. (2001) were 6-methoxy derivatives. This fact and the differentiation performed above with the pairs 20/23 and 22/29
396
397
(146 + 18) amu due to the break of the interglycosidic linkage was
observed (Table 2), 1 2 being the most common one. Therefore,
the pairs 12/16 and 19/26 can be labelled as quercetin-3-O-(2rhamnosyl) glucoside (12), quercetin-3-O-(6-rhamnosyl) glucoside
(quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, rutin) (16) (this last one conrmed by
the co-injection of the commercial standard), kaempferol-3-O(2-rhamnosyl) glucoside (19) and kaempferol-3-O-(6-rhamnosyl)
glucoside (kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside) (26). The pair of isomers
17/18 showed UV spectra of quercetin derivatives; their aglycone
was pentahydroxy-methoxy-avone ([AglcH] , m/z 331), and loss
of methyl radicals (15) was observed in their MS fragmentations;
thus, they could be considered as 6-methoxy-quercetin derivatives.
As already indicated, Bertrand et al. (2001) isolated 6-methoxyquercetin-3-O-rutinoside in P. trachylophus and taking into account
what was explained for monoglycosides in relation to the possible isomers 6/8 or galactoside/glucoside, these compounds
could be tentatively characterized as 6-methoxy-quercetin-3-O-(6rhamnosyl) galactoside (6-methoxy-quercetin-3-O-robinobioside)
(17) and 6-methoxy-quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (18). The isomers
25, 27 and 30 showed a tetrahydroxy-methoxy-avone aglycone
([AglcH] , m/z 315) in their MS fragmentation. Compounds 25 and
30 exhibited UV spectra of B-ring di-substituted avonoids and ions
[MH-15] were not observed in their MS fragmentation (Table 2),
so that they may be isorhamnetin derivatives, and similarly to
398
the indicated above, they can be labelled as isorhamnetin-3O-robinobioside (25) and isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (30). The
ion [MH-15] was observed in the MS of compound 27, which
can coincide with 6-methoxy-kaempferol-3-O-rutinosde, already
described in P. trachylophus by Bertrand et al. (2001). The pair 34/41
displayed a deprotonated molecular ion 30 amu higher than that
of the previous tetrahydroxy-methoxy-avone derivatives (25/30)
and may be 6-methoxy-isorhamnetin-derivatives, although the ion
[MH-15] was not abundant in compound 34 and was absent
from compound 41. For those reasons, they can be labelled as
6-methoxy-isorhamnetin-3-O-robinobioside (34) and 6-methoxyisorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (41), which were already isolated
from P. trachylophus by Bertrand et al. (2001). Compounds 3840
are trihydroxy-methoxy-avones ([AglcH] , m/z 299), with UV
spectra of di-substituted B-ring (Table 2) and, therefore, they can
correspond to chrysoeriol-7-O-robinobioside (38) and chrysoeriol7-O-rutinoside (40). Compound 39, possessing a UV spectrum of
apigenin derivative, may be 6-methoxy-apigenin-7-O-rutinoside.
Compound 33 is apigenin-7-O-rutinoside. Compound 36 has a UV
spectrum characteristic of avanone and was chromatographically
coincident, as well as in terms of MS spectrum, with the standard of hesperidin (hesperetin-7-O-rutinoside), already described
by Andrade-Neto et al. (1996) in P. trachyllophus.
3.1.4. Flavonoid-3-O-(2-rhamnosyl) rutinosides
Compounds 11 and 1315 presented deprotonated molecular
ions of avonoid-triglycosides (two rhamnoses and one hexose)
and the base peaks of their deprotonated aglycones were observed
in their MS spectra (11: quercetin, m/z 301; 13: kaempferol, m/z
285; 14: 6-methoxy-isorhamnetin, m/z 345 and 15: isorhamnetin,
m/z 315). The loss of the fragment of 266 amu (146 + 120) was
observed in the MS of all of these compounds, which is produced by the internal cleavage of a hexose by positions 0, 2
(120 amu) and involves a rhamnose (146 amu) at position 6,
this interglycosidic linkage being hard to be broken. Moreover, the
loss of 146 (radical rhamnosyl) and 164 (146 + 18, radical rhamnosyl+water) was observed, indicating a new glycosylation with
other rhamnose, this one being situated in the position 2 of the
hexose, a structure that is corroborated by the above mentioned
120 amu fragment (Fig. 4). Compounds 11 and 13 result from the
rhamnosylation of the 6 -position of compounds 12 and 19 or
of the 2 -position of compounds 16 and 26 and can be labelled
as quercetin-3-O-(2-rhamnosyl) rutinoside (11) and kaempferol3-O-(2-rhamnosyl) rutinoside (13). Similarly, compounds 14 and
15 derive from the rhamnosylation in 2 -position of the glucose
of compounds 41 and 30, respectively, and can be labelled as
6-methoxy-isorhamnetin-3-O-(2-rhamnosyl) rutinoside (14) and
isorhamnetin-3-O-(2-rhamnosyl) rutinoside (15).
3.2. Quantication of phenolic compounds
Besides qualitative differences between BGS and CS, as revealed
by the presence of compounds 10, 12, 14, 15, 19, 20, 22, 25, 26,
2830, 33, 3739 and 4145 only in BGS and of compounds 18,
23, 24, 31, 32 and 35 only in CS, their total phenolic content is
also quantitatively different (Fig. 1, Table 4). BGS (44.94 mg/g of
extract d.w.) contained more amount of phenolic compounds than
CS (37.20 mg/g of extract d.w.; p < 0.05). All compounds were found
in higher amounts (p < 0.05) in BGS, excepting compounds 11 (similar content) and compounds 17, 21 and 27 (in higher amounts in
CS).
Concerning phenolic acids, dihydrocaffeoyl quinic acid
4 + methoxylated dihydrocaffeoyl quinic acid 5 are the major
dihydrocaffeoyl quinic acid isomers in both samples, accounting
to 33.63 and 25.52% of total phenolic acids in BGS and CS, respectively. In BGS, other dihydrocaffeoyl quinic acid, compound 7, is
399
Table 4
Phenolic composition of GBS and CS (mg/g of extract d.w.).a
Compoundsb
GBS
CS
0.95 0.04
0.45 0.01
1.03 0.03
2.47 0.08
1.14 0.06
1.81 0.11
1.13 0.10
0.70 0.16
0.70 0.02
0.70 0.08
1.45 0.25
(only 16)
17
6-OMe-Querct-3-O-rob
0.40 0.16
12.88 0.40
18
6-OMe-Querct-3-O-rut
1.47 0.05
19
Kaempf-3-O-(2-rhmn) glc
0.54 0.06
20
Querct-3-O-gal
0.02 0.00
21 + 22
6-OMe-Querct-3-O-gal + Kaempf-3-O-gal
0.03 0.00
1.71 0.11
(only 21)
23
Querct-3-O-glc
0.59 0.14
24
6-OMe-Querct-3-O-glc
0.16 0.05
25
Isorhmn-3-O-rob
0.12 0.01
26
Kaempf-3-O-rut
0.55 0.04
27 + 28
6-OMe-Kaempf-3-O-rut + 6-OMe-Kaempf-3-O-gal
0.10 0.04
1.08 0.18
(only 27)
29
Kaempf-3-O-glc
0.05 0.01
Isorhmn-3-O-rut
1.17 0.07
30
6-OMe-Querct-3-O-pent + 6-OMe-Kaempf-3-O-glc
0.16 0.05
31 + 32
33 + 34 or 34 + 35 Apig-7-O-rut + 6-OMe-Isorhmn-3-O-rob or 6-OMe-Isorhmn-3-O-rob + 6-OMe-Isorhmn-3-O-glc 1.69 0.21(33 + 34) 0.43 0.17
(34 + 35)
36
Hespt-7-O-rut
12.11 0.66
6.16 0.07
37
Isorhmn-3-O-glc
0.04 0.03
Chrys-7-O-rob
0.08 0.04
38
39
6-OMe-Apig-7-O-rut
0.40 0.09
40
Chrys-7-O-rut
0.21 0.12
0.03 0.00
6-OMe-Isorhmn-3-O-rut + 6-OMe-Apig-7-O-gal
0.05 0.00
41 + 42
43
6-OMe-Apig-7-O-glc
0.05 0.01
44 + 45
Chrys-7-O-glc + 6-OMe-Chrys-7-O-glc
0.21 0.00
1
2
3
4+5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 + 15 + 16
Total
1.15 0.02
0.70 0.08
2.49 0.11
7.10 0.67
1.52 0.12
4.86 0.44
2.08 0.13
1.13 0.06
0.08 0.04
0.68 0.09
0.37 0.04
2.29 0.17
2.67 0.13
44.94
37.20
P Valuec
**
**
****
***
**
***
***
*
n.s.
***
**
****
****
***
**
****
n.s.
after two years there are no alkaloids (Santos and Moreno, 2004;
Cunha, 2005). Although it is not possible for us to know the age of
the CS leaves, the BGS leaves collected were one year old, i.e., were
produced in the previous season.
400
Fig. 5. In vitro inhibition of AChE (A), BuChE (B) and -glucosidase (C) by CS ()
and BGS (). The results are shown as mean SEM of three assays performed in
triplicate.
Andrade-Neto, M., Mendes, P.H., Silveira, E.R., 1996. An imidazole alkaloid and
other constituents from Pilocarpus trachyllophus. Phytochemistry 42, 885887.
Anon, 1912. Ex herbario hassleriano: novitates paraguarienses. XIV. Feddes Repert.
Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 10, 343348.
Atkins, T.W., Best, L.C., Flatt, P.R., Bailey, C.J., Matty, A.J., 1975. Effect of pilocarpine
on insulin secretion in normal and obese hyperglycaemic mice (ob/ob) and in
the rat. Gen. Pharmacol.-Vasc. 6, 4347.
Bertrand, C., Fabre, N., Moulis, C., 2001. Constituents of Pilocarpus trachylophus.
Fitoterapia 72, 844847.
Bruneton, J., 2009. PhytochimiePlantes Mdicinales. ditions Mdicales
Internationals, Paris.
Chase, M.W., Morton, C.M., Kallunki, J.A., 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of
Rutaceae: a cladistic analysis of the subfamilies using evidence from RBC and
ATP sequence variation. Am. J. Bot. 86, 11911199.
Cunha, A.P.M.A., 2005. Farmacognosia e Fitoqumica. Fundaco Calouste
Gulbenkian, Lisbon.
Custdio, L., Patarra, J., Albercio, F., Neng, N.R., Nogueira, J.M.F., Romano, A., 2015.
Phenolic composition, antioxidant potential and in vitro inhibitory activity of
leaves and acorns of Quercus suber on key enzymes relevant for hyperglycemia
and Alzheimers disease. Ind. Crops Prod. 64, 4561.
Devi, R., Vandana Singh, V., Chaudhary, A.K., 2010. Antidiabetic activity of
Pilocarpus microphyllus extract on streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Int. J.
Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 5, 8792.
Duke, J.A., Bogenschutz-Godwin, M.J., duCellier, J., Duke, P.-A.K., 2002. Handbook of
Medicinal Herbs. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Fan, P., Hay, A.-E., Marston, A., Hostettmann, K., 2008.
Acetylcholinesterase-inhibitory activity of linarin from Buddleja davidii,
structure-activity relationships of related avonoids, and chemical
investigation of Buddleja nitida. Pharm. Biol. 46, 596601.
Ferreres, F., Gil-Izquierdo, A., Vinholes, J., Silva, S.T., Valento, P., Andrade, P.B.,
2012. Bauhinia forcata link authenticity using avonoids prole: relation with
their biological properties. Food Chem. 134, 894904.
Gruenwald, J., Brendler, T., Jaenicke, C., 2000. PDR for Herbal Medicines. Thomson,
New Jersey.
Jung, M., Park, M., 2007. Acetylcholinesterase inhibition by avonoids from
Agrimonia pilosa. Molecules 12, 21302139.
Kaastra, R.C., 1982. Pilocarpinae (Rutaceae). Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 33, 1198.
Khan, M.T.H., Orhan, I., Senol, F.S., Kartal, M., Sener, B., Dvorsk, M., Smejkal,
K.,
401