REPUBLIC OF PARAGUAY

POWER OF ATTORNEY
XII judicial circumscription CORDILLERA

YEAR2006.No9695...FOLIO1
DOSSIER Jose Ramirez S / offense AGAINST PROPERTY OF

INDIVIDUALS

aggravated

robbery

is

attempted

IN

DEGREE...
COURT OF 1st INSTANCE INCriminal
JUDGERoberto Martinez..
SECRETARY No04.A CHARGE.
TAX AS ..OF

"Jose Ramirez S / offense AGAINST PROPERTY OF INDIVIDUALS AGGRAVATED ROBBERY ATTEMPT IN DEGREE--------------------------SUBJECT: PROSECUTION AND REQUIRE AUTO DRAW UP OPENING TRIAL.-

MR. CRIMINAL JUDGE OF GUARANTEES:

Mr. Cornelio Ramirez, Fiscal Agent for the Fourth of Jurisdiction of
Cordillera Criminal Unit, with seat and legal domicile at Julia Miranda Cueto
Estigarribia No. 273 c / Communards Lhokseumawe, Caacupe, in Case No. 9695
caratulada. Jose Ramirez S / offense AGAINST PROPERTY OF INDIVIDUALS
- aggravated robbery is attempted , "is addressed to you, and states as follows:
------------------ ---------------------------------------. THAT, in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 347 of the
Criminal Procedure Code, and its consistent, timely and presents case against
the accused: "Jose Ramirez, known by the nickname of Cure`i, Paraguayan
nationality, marital status Single, 26 - year-olds with CI N6.895.426,
domiciled in the street Daniel Aguilera, Km 87.5 city of Caacupe, son of
Dona Maria Governed Ramirez and Pedro Ramirez Ramirez, born on October
3, 1990 in the city of Asuncion and who weighs complaint by the commission
of the offense of aggravated robbery is attempted, according to the
considerations
which are then
passed
to
expose:
----------------------------------------DESCRIPTION OF THE FACTS:
The Public Prosecutor accuses the citizen "Jose Ramirez" being the author of the
offense of aggravated robbery is attempted, perpetrated dated May 19, 2006, at
approximately 23:00 pm. The victim Casimiro Gonzlez was walking on public
streets and at one point was intercepted by three unknown assailants who
attempted to seize their belongings producing a struggle between them why "Jose
Ramirez, he drew from his waist a knife sticking in the humanity of Casimiro
Gonzalez, not doing its job ( "Jose Ramirez), he fled because the victim was
helped by locals .----------------- --------

That research conducted are inconclusive about the participation of today

accused "Jose Ramirez, proof of this is that the victim recognized
as the author; as
well
as
the
statements
given
by
witnesses to the
fact .-----------------------Examined each of the items of evidence (Note No. 618 and their respective record
of proceedings), the participation of "Jose Ramirez in the offense of aggravated
robbery is confirmed, and given that this element is accredited Causation of the
commission of the offense .-------------- --------------------------------------------Concur in the present case all budgets of the offense of aggravated
robbery is attempted, and the same behavior is typical in that the process of
subsumption arises that it fits perfectly as described as such in the rule
contained in Art. 167of the Penal Code .----------- ---------It is also unlawful because it is not covered because of justification, it did not act

in self - defense or justification state of necessity under the regulations of Art. 19

and 20 of the Penal Code .---------------------------------The author was well aware of the illegality of the offense performed, and was able
to behave and determined in accordance with that knowledge, can not claim
not to know what he was doing and in doing so violated a criminal standard, so
that
it
and
its
consequent
behavior
it
is reprehensible. -------------------------------------------------- -----Action is also PUNITIVE, on the grounds that it is punishable under the Criminal
Code with the application of penalties, and this Fiscal Representation must
specifically require imprisonment for the same; we reiterate, are gathered and
concur in the conduct of Jose Ramirez, all legal budgets punishable act of
aggravated robbery is attempted. -------------It noted above, regarding the presence of legal budgets punishable act, initiated
behavior is characteristic unlawful, reprehensible and punishable, so it subsumes
the criminal contained in Art. 167 inc. 2 of the Criminal Code, aggravated
robbery for attempting to seize a movable property of others (a wallet) carrying one
of the assailants Jose Ramirez a weapon; in the present case a weapon; with
which he summoned the victim to remove his property .-------EVIDENCE:

TO ) TESTIMONIALS:
* Declaration of Jonacia Caceres ci No. 8455213
* Declaration of Ramon Sanchez ci No. 7583645
* Declaration of Cecilia Rivera ci No. 1258654
That under the provisions of Art. 350 of the Criminal Procedure Code and l
accused, he had the opportunity of previous inquest .------------------------------------------------------THEREFORE, in accordance with the aforementioned evidence, the factual and
legal description of offenses investigated, the equally indicated Causation, the
described legal classification arises clearly that the defendant Jose Ramirez
committed the offense of aggravated robbery defined and penalized in
the Art. 167 inc. 1 paragraph 2 of the Penal Code of Paraguay, and
consequently this representation Prosecutor requests that opened today, will be
punished
for
that
offense,
with imprisonment, for
which
requested Auto to trial is made, the day is set and when preliminary hearing is
deemed to be offered the marked tests, which are pending diligencien
embodiment, for this purpose the Fiscal Research Notebook refers .--------------------------------GOD SAVE YOU.

My opinion:
This type of accusation is quite recurrent in our society. Increasing
burglaries in our streets are becoming a serious problem because, in
this case, it threatens the life of the victim