Statement of the Problem

Specifically it sought to answer the following questions:

1. What are the sensory attribute of the most acceptable formulation in terms of the
following criteria:
1.1 appearance;
1.2 color;
1.3 texture;
1.4 taste;
1.5 general acceptability?
11. Appearance
lot
1

mean
std deviation
5.13
1.76

verbal interpretation
Good

5.77

1.33

Very Good

4.90

1.32

GOOD

4.83

1.26

GOOD

ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within Groups

Total

SS
16.2916
7
237.7
253.991
7

df

MS
F
P-value
F crit
5.43055 2.65016 0.05210 2.68280
3
6
6
4
9
2.04913
116
8

119

INTERPRETATION: There is no significant difference in the assessment of the

respondents regarding the APPEARANCE of the 4 lots, since the F-value
of2.650 has a p-value greater than 0.05.

1.2. Color
lot

mean

4.90

1.47

verbal
interpretation
Good

5.43

1.17

Good

4.77

1.19

GOOD

4.63

1.38

GOOD

ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within
Groups

Total

std deviation

SS
11.066
67

df
3

198.4

116

209.46
67

119

MS
3.6888
89
1.7103
45

F
2.156
81

Pvalue
0.0968
96

F crit
2.6828
09

INTERPRETATION: There is no significant difference in the assessment of the

respondents regarding the COLOR of the 4 lots, since the F-value of2.157 has a
p-value greater than 0.05.

1.3. Texture
lot

mean

std deviation

4.93

1.62

verbal
interpretation
Good

5.23

1.45

Good

4.93

1.08

GOOD

4.70

1.06

GOOD

ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within
Groups

4.3

203.4

116

Total

207.7

119

SS

INTERPRETATION:

df

MS
1.4333
33
1.7534
48

F
0.8174
37

Pvalue
0.4867
56

F crit
2.6828
09

There is no significant difference in the assessment of the

respondents regarding the TEXTURE of the 4 lots, since the F-value of0.817 has a pvalue greater than 0.05.

1.4. Taste
lot

mean

std deviation

6.57

2.11

verbal
interpretation
Like Moderately

6.73

1.46

Like Moderately

6.13

1.74

Like Slightly

5.73

1.91

Like Slightly

ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within
Groups

18.225
384.56
67

116

Total

402.79
17

119

SS

INTERPRETATION:

df

MS
3

6.075
3.315
23

F
1.8324
52

Pvalue
0.1451
15

F crit
2.6828
09

There is no significant difference in the assessment of the

respondents regarding the TASTE of the 4 lots, since the F-value of1.832has a pvaluegreater than 0.05.
1.5. general acceptability
lot

mean

std deviation

6.23

1.285

verbal
interpretation
LIKE slightly

6.33

0.997

LIKE slightly

5.73

0.828

LIKE slightly

5.73

1.157

LIKE slightly

ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within
Groups

9.225
365.76
67

116

Total

374.99
17

119

SS

INTERPRETATION:

df

MS
3

3.075
3.1531
61

F
0.9752
12

Pvalue
0.4070
25

F crit
2.6828
09

There is no significant difference in the assessment of the

respondents regarding the GENERAL ACCEPTABILITY of the 4 lots, since the F-value
of 0.975 has a p-value GREATER than 0.05.

VERBAL INTERPRETATION OF THE MEANS

8.50-9.00
7.50-8.49
6.50-7.49
5.50-6.49
4.50-5.49
3.50-4.49
2.50-3.49
1.50-2.49
1 -1.49

like extremely
like very much
like moderately
like slightly
neither like nor dislike
dislike slightly
dislike moderately
dislike very much
dislike

6.50-7.00
5.50-6.49
4.50-5.49
3.50-4.49
2.50-3.49
1.50-2.49
1.00-1.49

excellent
very good
good
average
fair
poor
very poor