Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The word Nazir is often translated as Identical Copy of a thing. But actually it
does not means a copy but plurality of Exaxtly alike things such that each
one of them is genuine or original or both.
[ IF THING A IS A NAZ:IR OF AN OTHER THING B THEN IT INCLUDES ALL
ATTRIBUTES WITH THE NECESSARY AND RATIONAL EXCEPTION OF
ATTRIBUTES WHICH EITHER CONTRADICTETH NAZ:I:R OR IMPLIETH THE
NEGATION OF NAZ:I:R. BUT KHAIRABADI SCHOOL OF THOUGHT INCLUDETH
THEM AS WELL].
For convenience one may say Real Copy or Identical Copy, but copy does not
mean a copy but both identical distinct exact alike original and genuine
individuals. The word Identical is not used in the meaning of One and the
Same "Ainiah but Exactly alike.
Never Created.
A Naz:i:r is a Special case of an Individual that is Neither Posterior Nor Prior.
So If an Existent is Self Possible and Is First of All Existents then this meaneth that its Naz:i:r is
Self Possible but Absurd With Seperate.
Since if a thing is First of All Creations then it is first of All Creations if and only if :=
1] Any Self Possible Individual Prior to it is Absurd with Seperate.
2] Any Self Possible Individual Neither Posterior to It nor Prior to It is Absurd With Seperate.
3] Its Naz:i:r is Absurd With Seperate.
4] Self Possible Individuals Posterior to It are Not Absurd With Seperate.
5] The Existent itself is a Self Possible Individual.
Since if an Individual Existing Prophet is Last of All Created Prophets then the Prophet is the last
of All Created Prophets if and only if :=
1] The Prophet is a Self Possible Individual.
2] Any Self Possible Individual Prophet Posterior to the Individual Existing Prophet is ABSURD
WITH SEPARATE [MUH:A:L BIL GH:AIR].
3] Any Individual Self Possible Prophet that is Neither Posterior to the stated existing Individual
Prophet Nor Prior to the Stated above individual ,is Absurd with Seperate.
4] Its Naz:i:r is Absurd With Seperate.
5] Self Possible individuals Prior to the Stated above are not Absurd With Seperate.
So if a thing is last of all Prophet Self Implieth that it its Naz:i:r is Absurd With Separate.
If the Naz:ir of a thing is Not Absurd With Separate then the Thing is Neither First of all its Kind
nor last of all its type. This is the point to be noted.
Now we come to discuss to famous question of Khairabadi School of Thought.
The question consisteth of two parts.
a] If Naz:ir of an Existing thing that is First of all of its Kind existeth then if its Naz:ir is supposed to
exist then either it is either prior to it or posterior to it.
In the first case the said thing ceaseth to be first. Hence ceaseth to be a Naz:ir. In the second
case the the individual that is the Naz:ir becometh the second and not first. Second is not a
Naz:i:r of First.
b] a] If Naz:ir of an Existing thing that is Last of all of its Kind existeth then if its Naz:ir is supposed
to exist then either it is either prior to it or posterior to it.
If it is Prior to the last then it is not Last and Last cannot be a Naz:i:r of one that is not Last.
If it posterior to it then the thing ceaseth to be the Last and the Naz:ir becometh the Last. Last
cannot be A Naz:i:r of a thing that is not Last.
th
If not then it is not the Naz:i:r. Since A Naz:i:r of a thing is equal to the thing in
all Attributes.
But this is Self Absurd since in this case two distinct things are Naz:i:r of one an
other such that none of them hath a Naz:i:r.
1]A CREATED EXISTENT IS FIRST OF ALL CREATED EXISTENTS WHOSE PRIOR EXISTENT IS SELF POSSIBLE
YET NOT CREATED , WHOSE NEITHER POSTERIOR NOR PRIOR EXISTENT IS SELF POSSIBLE YET NOT
CREATED . AND WHOSE NAZ:I:R IS SELF POSSIBLE YET NOT CREATED.
2] A CREATED PROPHET IS LAST AND FINAL OF ALL CREATED PROPHETS WHOSE POSTERIOR PROPHET IS
SELF POSSIBLE YET NOT CREATED , WHOSE NEITHER POSTERIOR NOR PRIOR PROPHET IS SELF POSSIBLE
YET NOT CREATED . AND WHOSE NAZ:I:R IS SELF POSSIBLE YET NOT CREATED.
THE CASES NOT THAT:=
1]
A CREATED EXISTENT IS FIRST OF ALL CREATED EXISTENTS WHOSE PRIOR EXISTENT IS SELF ABSURD
HENCE NOT CREATED , WHOSE NEITHER POSTERIOR NOR PRIOR EXISTENT IS SELF ANSURD HENCE NOT
CREATED . AND WHOSE NAZ:I:R IS SELF ABSURD HENCE NOT CREATED.
2]
A CREATED PROPHET IS LAST AND FINAL OF ALL CREATED PROPHETS WHOSE POSTERIOR PROPHET IS
SELF PSELF ABSURD HENCE NOT CREATED , WHOSE NEITHER POSTERIOR NOR PRIOR PROPHET IS SELF
ABSURD HENCE NOT CREATED . AND WHOSE NAZ:I:R IS SELF ABSURD HENCE NOT CREATED.
HENCE THE FIRST ARGUMENT IS A FALLACY. BASED ON INCORRECT DEFINATIONS OF SELF POSSIBLE FIRST
AND LAST.
That is why scholars, logicians, philosophers, and dialectics all agree that Maulivi Fad:l Haqq
Khairabadi errerd in the concepts of Self Possible of first and last.
2] As for the second argument it is stated that Kidhb is Muh:a:l Bil Ghair therefore one may see a
number of thse discussions in this Scribd form. So it is not necessary to discuss it further.
REASON WHY THIS DEBATE CEASED TO BE EXCERCISED.
It is very evident that Khairaba:di: school realised that this debate is based just on the Verbal
Disputes and not upon real disputes and there is no need to discuss it since they agree with the
'Ahlussunnah on the Essence , Substance and Reality.
But 'Ah:mad Rad:a: of Bans Baraili continued this debate and did not consider it as a verbal
dispute.