Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Smashing Pumpkins
A studio history with Billy Corgan, Flood,
Jimmy Chamberlin, Butch Vig, Alan Moulder,
and Tommy Lee
Blake Mills
Shawn Everett
gr
Billy Bush
ho
o.
Annette Cisneros
Offspring, Social Distortion, Alice in Chains
Jack Shirley
Deafheaven, Loma Prieta
Music Reviews
@y
a
Chris Staples
Margo Price
Issue
hl
ia
sa
rm
Gear Reviews
No.
Sept/Oct
115
2016
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Hello and
Tape Op
#115!
Letters
Annette Cisneros
Smashing Pumpkins
Jack Shirley
Billy Bush
Blake Mills
Shawn Everett
Gear Reviews
Music Reviews
Johns End Rant
102
ho
o.
104
108
gr
12
14
20
32
40
50
56
66
94
98
p a g e
welcome to
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
Looking back over the history of recorded music, one thing is for
sure: the technology used is always in flux. When Ive interviewed engineers from the 60s or 70s,
there will invariably be a point where the number of analog tape tracks (1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24,
32, 48) a studio was able to offer would affect the financial end of running a business (see Annette
Cisneros interview this issue). These days, its quite different; and while some
studios, engineers, and producers will look to the past and pick and choose the recording
technology they wish to utilize, the majority of recording folks are looking at a computer screen,
unlimited track count, and data to back up.
Check out John Baccigaluppis End Rant this issue. As technology focuses on the everyday user,
hes questioning his faith in computer companies as many other professionals might be doing these
days. Note Billy Bushs tale of job advancement due to his eagerness to explore new technologies.
Read Jack Shirleys story of moving from digital to tape for better sounds and workflow.
The technology of recording is fascinating, but we must always keep in mind that it only serves
a means. Capturing art, expression, and emotion in any way possible is the goal.
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Editor
Larry Crane
Online Publisher
Geoff Stanfield
Jonathan Saxon, James Salter, Jake Brown, Scarlet Page, Scott Evans,
Lindsey Byrnes, Scott McDowell, Dave Cerminara, Garrett Haines,
Tom Fine, Adam Kagan, John Noll, Dana Gumbiner, and Stephen Allbritten.
Disclaimer
gr
TAPE OP magazine wants to make clear that the opinions expressed within reviews, letters, and
articles are not necessarily the opinions of the publishers. Tape Op is intended as a forum to
advance the art of recording, and there are many choices made along that path.
Editorial Office
ho
o.
(For submissions, letters, music for review. Music for review is also
reviewed in the Sacramento office, address below)
P.O. Box 86409, Portland, OR 97286 voicemail 503-208-4033
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
All unsolicited submissions and letters sent to us become the property of Tape Op.
10/Tape Op#115/Masthead
Advertising
www.tapeop.com
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
rm
gr
I just want to say thank you for a great mag! I just read
#113 from cover to cover. The Don Was and Scott Hull articles
were so good, in different ways. The Winner Takes All by
Larry Crane on the back page is so relevant to my 40+-year
career as a band member and songwriter. Keep em coming!
Jonnie Miles <jonniemiles@gmail.com>
ho
o.
we hate
bad records.
@y
a
hl
ia
sa
12/Tape Op#115/Letters/
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
human dynamics.
I thought it would be cool to work in a recording studio.
Id always loved music, so after high school I said, Id Yep. Or when the artist youre working with, or even the
like to work in a studio! I went to an engineering
engineer too, are doing cocaine throughout the
school in North Hollywood called Sound Master. It
night. How do you deal with that?
doesnt exist there anymore. I think its in Alhambra, How do you deal with that?
[CA], now [currently known as Pinnacle College].
Carefully. Everybodys like, Come on, come on. Lets go!
When I finished the school I didnt get a job in a
Were your parents supportive?
studio right away, so I worked at a record store for a
Yes, they were very supportive. I was born and raised here
while. Then I got a job at Rusk Sound [Studios]. Its
in Montebello, [CA]. The school was in North
a studio in Hollywood on La Brea Avenue, between
Hollywood, so it wasnt very far. We learned how to
Hollywood and Sunset. I think the sign is still out
align tape machines there. Pro Tools wasnt even
there on La Brea.
invented yet when I was in school. We learned all
about tape machines; 24-track and 2-track machines. How did you get that job?
So when you got out of there, were you I heard they needed an assistant, so I just went in there.
Of course you work for free for a while, so that they
ready to work in a studio?
can see what youve got. Then I started getting paid.
Yep. Working with bands you get to learn [how to work
The assistant engineer there told me that Eldorado
with artists].
Annette Cisneros
gr
ypes of Desks
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
by Jonathan Saxon
photo by James Salter
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Recording [Studios] was looking for a woman We were a well-oiled machine. We all knew our roles and
assistant, because a woman assistant had just left
what to do. We met Bryan at Track Records, but he
and they wanted another woman to be an assistant.
didnt really come into the picture until we moved to
Sunset [Blvd.]. He had left Track, and he was
Really! Thats unusual, right?
working at Capitol. Since Dave knew Bryan, he said,
Yeah, it was. But at the time I didnt think anything of it.
Youre too good to be an assistant there. Come work
I wasnt even going to ask any gender
with us. We worked together at that location for
related questions. To me, youre an
about six years. Then we moved to Burbank on
engineer. Period.
Providencia [Avenue]. Gary bought that place.
Thats my thinking as well. I didnt know how rare
woman engineers were until I was in the business for What prompted the move to Providencia?
a while. It is rare. Gary Gunton owned Eldorado, and Gary was just renting on Sunset, so he bought the
he also managed Dave Jerden. Dave just finished
building in Burbank. There was a warehouse that was
working with the Rolling Stones as an engineer. He
being built, and he bought the warehouse. He had
wanted to be a producer, not just an engineer, and
his guy, Steve Klein [Steven Kleins Sound Control
to produce local bands. I just happened to get a job
Room, Inc.], build out the control rooms in there.
at Eldorado, and since Gary managed Dave thats how He doesnt own it any more, does he?
I started working with Dave.
No, he sold it; the studio and everything. We did a lot
of records at Eldorado on Sunset. Then we moved to
So you started working with Dave before
Providencia and we worked with a lot of the same
Bryan Carlstrom started working
bands, like The Offspring. We did Ixnay on the
with him.
Hombre at Sunset, and we did Americana at
Oh, yeah. We worked together for almost two years before
Providencia.
we met Bryan. Eldorado used to be on Sunset, right
across from Capitol Records. I think the first project I What about the early Alice in Chains
did with Dave was a band called 54-40 from Canada.
and Janes Addiction records? Was
There are quite a few artists we worked with at
that on Sunset?
Eldorado. Then we had to move because the old Dave and I did the first Janes Addiction, Nothings
building wasnt up to earthquake code. We moved to
Shocking, at Eldorado on Vine before we moved to
Track Record [Studios], and thats where we met Bryan.
Track Record.
gr
@y
a
rm
wasnt working. I was able to work with other artists Well, Ill know I want to use a certain preamp or
too. I assisted on a lot of projects. It was cool
compressor. I just make sure that what Im recording
because I was able to work with a lot of other
is sounding great and everythings going to Pro Tools
engineers and producers and learn from them.
okay. As for reverb and things like that, I just use it
dont think your AllMusic.com
to monitor. I dont record with the reverb, because I
discography is as thorough as it
dont know how much Ill want to use in the mix, or
should be.
even if thats the right kind of reverb Ill want. Maybe
Thats true. And if the record company secretary didnt
Ill decide that its just a delay I want to use. Working
get your name on the record, then youre not on
with Dave, hell have the mix in mind all the time.
AllMusic. There are a lot of records I worked on that
He [hears] the end product. So when hes recording,
Im not credited for. Its just paperwork. Somebody
he says, I want that guitar to have a chorus effect
didnt get my name on something.
on it. So we record the chorus effect. Thats the
All those Summit preamps and so forth,
difference working with Dave he knows exactly
were those owned by the studio, or
what he wants. If somethings not working hell pull
were those Bryans?
out another box to try. A lot of people just wait,
Those were Bryans. He bought that equipment when we
Well fix it in the mix. You want to get it right when
were working with Dave. There are pictures of when
you record it. You want the sounds to be there. If the
we were working with The Offspring. Bryan built the
guitar amp isnt quite the right sound for a part, hell
very first big Pro Tools rig.
try another amp.
ho
o.
ia
sa
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
ho
o.
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Smashing
Pumpkins
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
A Studio History
hl
by Jake Brown
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
ia
sa
hl
What made the pocket Jimmy Chamberlin: I Am One was really begat out of
a drum machine beat that Billy had come up with
between Billy and
that was really almost impossible to play on a drum
Jimmy so special,
kit. Its just one of those things where somebody
and key, to the core of
writes something on a drum machine with absolutely
the bands sound?
rm
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
ia
sa
rm
Butch Vig
hl
Billy Corgan: I came in with a very strong mind that we Jimmys drumming took things to an
entirely new level. What were you
needed to have a guitar sound that was idealized in
pushing him to do on Siamese Dream?
the way that Cream or Boston had an idealized guitar
sound. Im not really sure how I arrived there, but it Billy Corgan: Siamese Dream was a tricky record as it
pertains to Jimmy, because Jimmy was asked to be
probably had something to do with the fact that
more than he was at that moment. And, at the same
Butch finished Gish and literally packed up the next
time, he was asked to be less than he was at that
day to record Nevermind with Nirvana. We were at
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
and in his very straightforward way said, Right, this ones Flood: When Pro Tools first came out, Id been working Billy Corgan: We spent over a year forming this new language,
with Trent [Reznor, Nine Inch Nails] and I was very,
which is best embodied and probably most clearly stated
good. This ones not good. This drum set sucks. This has to
very used to working with whole songs based in Pro
on United States. There, somehow, a primal foundational
be better. He helped me task out what needed to be done
Tools, and then committing them to tape. So it was
riff, which any kid can write in his bedroom, somehow
and helped me finish a record, which I dont think I would
very good for Machina. When he wanted to go off and
turns into this other thing through repetition and a
have had the strength to finish on my own.
follow a particular idea he could do that in Pro Tools,
psychotic, polyrhythmic approach throwing some weird
Flood: Billy was really frustrated, because what he was
brilliantly. It was a great vehicle for him. Then I would
blues vocal that probably seems to be from another song
hearing in his head wasnt seeming to translate. It was
try and hone those ideas down; just trying to make
in that song, you can hear where all the pieces connected.
a lot of technical issues, where theyd tried to do things
decisions. It was really good, and it meant that Billy
Terrys sonic landscape is pretty particular, and of course I
in a certain way and it hadnt worked. When youve got
could get rid of some of his frustrations, or try ideas
was aware of it because I was a fan of the records he had
such a major part of your band dynamic missing, it was
while I was trying to manage something else. This is
worked on. I got to get inside that, see the stark beauty I
a bit like everybody was unsure of how to move
another reason why Alan [Moulder] is so vital; because
was attracted to, and [feel] the muscular power of what he
forward. I came into it cold. I hadnt heard any of the
he understands. If youre dealing with a very difficult
likes to hear coming through the speakers. I think that had
songs; I just started going through them, and it was
situation, someones got your back. The same for Billy.
a very positive influence in cleaning up our act a little bit,
obvious that it was such an intensely personal record.
He knows as soon as Alan walks in the room that he
as far as what we were going for.
It was going to be a solo record, but still had
and the other guys in the band respect him immensely. Terry Date: We were trying to make that record using all
something about the Pumpkins in it.
Thats the thing about albums and individuals. Its
tape without Pro Tools. During my time on the record,
Billy Corgan: I was a bit of a hot gambler. Every production
never about one person; its always about a group of
thats all we used. The challenge was competing with
decision I made seemed to pay off, and so, for me, in
people. One person cannot take credit; its that
the advantages of Pro Tools while recording only to
that period of my life the production style was intrinsic
collaboration. Thats whats brilliant about music:
tape. There was no fixing parts. We had to get them
to the songwriting, and the songwriting was intrinsic to
capturing human beings reacting and working
right the first time, and Jimmy and Billy had a unique
the production style. Nobody had really made a record
together, and providing an emotional response. You
pocket that wouldnt work with a click track.
like Adore, up to that point.
hope that you can capture that. I think you can. Its Billy Corgan: Our bringing Roy in was trying to bring in
You continued your working
hard, but you can do it; and the Pumpkins were
some peacock-type color over the top of the record. I
relationship with Flood on
amazing for that. I think for me, Mellon Collie, and
kept saying to Jimmy, Why is there no psychedelia on
Machina/The Machines of God, but also
Adore, and Machina capture that emotion perfectly
this record? Every time weve ever made a record,
made the decision to bring Jimmy
theyre just very, very different records.
theres been some psychedelia to it. Asking Roy to be
Chamberlin back into the fold. What
a part of that, the vocal production and wider vocal
made you feel his live sound was the way Billy, on your reunion record, Zeitgeist,
seemed to be the perfect complement to lets just say
to go after coming off a more
you enlisted an eclectic collection of
a simpler version of the bands music.
programmed drum sound?
co-producers, starting with the core of
y o u r s e l f a n d d r u m m e r J i m m y Where were you by the time of the
Billy Corgan: First off, Jimmy hadnt played drums a lot
Chamberlin, then the great Terry
for the three years he was out of the group, so it took
Teargarden by Kaleidyscope series? Its
Date and legendary Roy Thomas Baker.
a while for him to even find his chops. Because hed
by far one of the bands most vivid
What was the root of that decision?
broken the linear chain of us working together, it
expressions, both sonically and
wasnt like he just stepped back in and picked back up Billy Corgan: With Jimmy and I as the albums core
stylistically.
emotionally and musically where he left off. In fact, he
production team, I assumed that it would take us a Billy Corgan: The tonal aspect of music to me is a felt
missed the whole transition of Adore. The last record
while to form a new language. I was surprised once we
language, and its felt in such a particular way that I
hed played on was Mellon Collie, and now hes
got into it that the language seemed to want to steer
dont feel it any other way, which is strange. When Im
playing on Machina; where spontaneity, darkness, and
itself towards the primal and the elementary. It was
working on a musical track, and I feel it needs a certain
these weird undersea tones are prevailing. Were
almost like we got to start over. I know the audience
Strat sound, I cant hear another sound. Theres no
speeding up and slowing down drums, and doing
expectation was that we were going to pick up either
alternate in mind; I feel like I need this particular tone,
anything in our power to make every element of the
where we left off, or where Siamese Dream left off, if
in this particular color, to say what I want to say. I get
record sound different. So Jimmy was thrown into an
they got their wish. But for us, emotionally, it was
very focused in that way, and maybe it doesnt always
interesting fire. I found the most effective thing to do
almost like going back to the pre-metallic roots of Gish,
work, but thats just the way Ive always worked. I
with him, at that point, was just to say, Heres the
where it was all about the [guitar] riff, the drum riff,
decided to make Teargarden a public experiment, where
song. And we would go and record it.
and the interlocking of those things that created a
I was going take you into the bedroom and I was gonna
Jimmy Chamberlin: On Machina, I think we got in my
certain, impressive power.
say, Okay, heres my first song. Im going to be okay
opinion to where we always wanted to be sonically. Jimmy Chamberlin: We rented a house in North Scottsdale,
with letting you listen to me not at my best; not even
That record, for me drum-wise with the distortion and
[Arizona], and I think we were down there for maybe
trying to be my best. I did announce Teargarden as a
the [Eventide] Omnipressor on the snare drum, the
two or three months. The idea was: Before we start
public process of reclamation and rebuilding, and that
crispy-and-crunchiness of those drums, and how they
yakking about this, lets get in a room and see if theres
turned out to be true.
interface with the guitar dynamics from a production
anything there. It took a while for us both to wrap our On Monuments to an Elegy, you
standpoint, really is our crowning achievement.
heads around A.) Do we want to do this journey? and
broadened your collaborative
Howard Willing [engineer]: We recorded part of that
B.) Can we do this journey? Can we play music, just the
resume even wider, bringing in
album at the bands rehearsal complex, Pumpkinland,
two of us now, not in a room with James [Iha] and Darcy
Howard Willing as co-producer and
and it was wild. There was an API console up at the
[Wretzky], or Melissa [Auf der Maur] hashing out stuff?
Mtley Cre drummer Tommy Lee to
front, and it was like, Okay, this is where were
Were probably the two most opinionated ones, so just
sit behind the kit. What direction
recording. I said, What the fuck is this? This place was
us two in a room making value judgments about music
were you seeking to take the record
enormous. We had PAs set up. Thats how we would track
is what you hear on Zeitgeist. I think when he and I
sonically?
and rehearse, with the PAs going! So if Jimmy was
honestly challenge each other, thats when the good Billy Corgan: The biggest change was bringing in Tommy
playing drums, he was getting blasted with the PA and
stuff happens. Thats where songs like United States
Lee. What was exciting about it was there were
thats getting picked up by all the microphones. That
and Doomsday Clock came from. They were born of
moments on Monuments that, even though it sounds
became part of the sound of that record.
those challenges.
like the Smashing Pumpkins, it doesnt sound like any
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
gr
@y
a
ho
o.
Billy Corgan: The studio, as its been conceived for the last
50 years, doesnt really matter anymore. The studio is
how you use technology, and when I think of my
position visvis the studio today, I am an
anachronism. No matter how well I can do what I can
do in a studio setting, I still think it pales in comparison
to what somebody can do using technology in the way
I once used technology which was pushing it to its
seams. As a producer, if youre not taking it all the way
to the end of that particular rainbow whatever youre
into youre really not producing.
ia
sa
rm
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Jack Shirley
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
I would say its a right place, right time type of scenario. Ive
been doing this in the area for over 12 years, and when I started
with a [Digidesign] Mbox and a PC in my parents garage the
peninsula between South San Francisco and Mountain View was
full of punk kids playing music, and there wasnt anyone doing
DIY recording. Maybe there were people doing what I do now, a
mid-level kind of studio, but there was nobody doing the real
low-level thing in their house. I was in a band that was part of
a bigger community, and I think it was just a no-brainer. Jacks
recording over at his house. Lets go there. Some of those
people who were part of that are still making music, and got
bigger. Bands like Loma Prieta or Deafheaven. They get some
recognition, and you just assume theyll go to the next step. But
a lot of those people have kept coming back.
It is, because its always better the second time. Or the third or
fourth.
Its never completed in one day. They might have just tracked in a
day, then I mixed and mastered later.
gr
[laughs] Thats just the band glossing over credits. I almost never
mix the same day. Its very, very rare.
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
can clip the API console before the Pro Tools output
Oh, dude. Half the people who walk in here ask me what
will clip.
that is [points at tape deck], because theyve never
seen a tape machine. Admittedly, when I went to go Its kind of ironic to buy a world-class
console that was designed for wicked
pick that up from the guy I bought it from, I had
high headroom, then do your best to
never seen a tape machine in real life.
Really?
I mean, I had the little one [1/4-inch, 2-track]. But I [laughs] Not crushing. Just enough to round it off. And
I leave plenty of headroom on the master bus. But
had never seen a 2-inch tape machine. I went to get
Im pretty liberal when its time to go to the 2-track
it and its like, Whoa, this thing weighs 400
tape at the end. And anything that comes off of that
pounds! But thats how it is when you have your
is flat not in a brick wall way, but in the tape way.
own studio and all you ever do is work by yourself. If
When you look at digital [waveforms], there are
you want to learn how to use something, you have
spikes everywhere. Tracks that come off the tape
to go get one. Thats why a lot of gear went in and
machine, even if its moderately hitting tape its
out over the years I was figuring out my tastes.
flat, and thats a beautiful thing. Especially if youre
You also master a lot of your own
trying to do mastering. When I get music that I didnt
recordings.
mix, that machine [points at tape deck] is part of my
Probably ninety percent. Maybe more.
mastering chain, because it does the work of a limiter
Ive been getting more of that lately.
without sounding like it. Therere no stray transients
Can you master this too? I dont
anywhere. All I have to do is raise my fader and most
love it, but its increasingly common.
of my loudness is already handled. There were times
And its totally normal for you.
when I didnt have the gear to saturate sounds in a
It came out of necessity. When you work with punk rock
nice, musical way, and I didnt have the know-how to
kids theyre not going to spend $500 to master their
EQ something so it easily could be loud. And people
$500 recording. They may not even know what
were like, I want my recording to be louder than
mastering is. And, admittedly, I was really bad at it
Jane Doe, And Id say, Alright. Well try! Lets see
when I first started. I tried a lot of stupid techniques,
what happens! And those recordings sound fucking
mostly with my own band. But I feel like Ive gotten
terrible. But you know, you learn. [laughs] Ive found
pretty good at it, to the point now where I do a lot of
that the more analog my situation has gotten, the
just mastering. I say on my website, Im not a
easier it is it just does the sound that you are trying
mastering engineer, and this is not a mastering studio.
to do, all by itself. The same way that a film photo
And its cheap because of that. I just charge my regular
can get blown out, in a beautiful way. The tape is
hourly rate. I cant do the same kind of tricks that some
magic. Yes, I absolutely can emulate it in the
places do, because I dont have the equipment.
computer, but it takes ten steps to do what I can do,
Mastering is a fairly advanced art, at
just by pushing a fader up a little bit further.
this point.
Absolutely. But for my own recordings the mastering A lot of the people I know who have tape
decks, and who were tape proponents,
wont be anything more than a little bit of fine-tuning
have been slowly moving away from it.
EQ, and thats basically all Im doing. The bulk of the
A lot of them have been moving more
work is done in the mix. By the time its done it needs
and more into the box, even the ones
a few dB of volume and some surgical EQ to carve out
who have sick outboard gear. But tape
a couple of spots, and thats it. I run it through the
specifically is challenging in a bunch
Massey Limiter, or the UAD Cambridge EQ, or the UAD
of ways: cost, getting good tape stock,
Dangerous BAX EQ that things badass.
gr
These days a lot of people probably have Hell, yes. Its like tape. Not to the same extent, but, yes;
I have my Pro Tools outputs calibrated hot so that I
no idea what a plate reverb is!
ho
o.
@y
a
ia
sa
rm
hl
more I upgrade this gear, the easier it gets to make Yes, yes. You have to find bands who can make it
I had a MIDI controller propped up in the corner for ten
through a whole song. Which Im lucky enough to
loud recordings.
years. Nobody ever said, We should put keys on our
have found. But its still a hybrid situation; this place
record. The first week that my Hammond [organ] was Is that the gear, or is that you?
can also be a fully digital studio. All that means is
here, it made it onto three records. [laughs] When the Well, for instance I was passive summing for a really
well say, Oh, that drum take was alright. But one fill
piano showed up it was like, Oh dude! We should put
long time. When I got to active summing, it was like,
was bad, and that fill was good on the last take. So
piano on this record! Bands who would never want
Oh wow, this is great. Now Ive got amplifiers [on
lets bookmark that, and when we dump it all in the
spacey delay shit, they look at these tape echoes and
the] channel. So when I push my kick drum up, its
computer well just replace it. Its as simple as that.
they say, We should put that on the recording. Theres
getting saturated on its own. The passive summing is
However, there are bands like a Deafheaven kind of
something about it. They dont care where it came from
infinite headroom. It sounds cool, but its not doing
band those dudes can just play. Those songs are ten
if they want delay. They dont even understand how a
any squishiness.
minutes long. Those are live takes to tape, with no
tape delay works. But theyre excited by it. And when I So you feel like getting some saturation
editing. One of the songs on the new record is the
get my EMT plate reverb tomorrow, I can walk people
or compression on each individual
first take of the first day. All the way through, live to
into the kitchen and say, Thats a reverb.
channel is important.
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
tape. A lot of bands that come here might not all be I assume a lot of your clients are on
virtuosos, but theyre all happy with what went down
tight budgets. I know mine are. Have
on a take. And thats great.
you found it hard to balance that
rm
@y
a
ia
sa
ho
o.
gr
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Yes, bigger label, following up this big record, and all that.
They werent done writing when we got to the studio. They I know enough to know what I want. Thats all it is. It
were under a little pressure. But thankfully it was more on
might not be the best way to do it, but its what we
them than me, because I dont have anything to do with
want. Thats really the bottom line to everything that
that part of it. Im not a producer; Im an engineer.
gets done here. r
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
rm
Two days. It probably would have been one day, but they
werent done writing. We did two days at first, and then
one song was done later. So four songs were done in
that first session, but Im pretty sure the drums were
done the first day.
hl
ia
sa
Awesome.
The second song on the record that was the first take,
on the first day. We spent maybe four hours setting
everything up, and then it was a test take. Luckily I
wasnt fucking with EQs, or levels, or anything. [laughs]
Dan came in after playing, listened to it, and was like,
Yeah, its cool. Lets go get lunch. That was the vibe
of the whole record.
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
1
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
00%
gr
Billy Bush
ho
o.
by Geoff Stanfield
rm
hl
ia
sa
how to use it, and then come show them how to use
it. I studied all the different programs: Cubase, Sonic
Solutions, and Pro Tools. At the time, Pro Tools had
just become version 4.3 and the 888 interfaces had
come out. Somehow Id gotten ahold of Christopher
Bock, the Executive Vice President of Digidesign.
Sweetest dude on the planet, rest his soul. He said,
Come out to San Francisco. Ill blow your mind. I
flew out there and he had a studio setup in his
backyard. At the time, people were starting to use it;
but nobody was making major label, high-profile,
million dollar budget records on it. People were using
it carefully, like, Maybe well fly our drums into it, do
a little tweak, and fly them back to tape. Nobody
was saying, Im making the record on Pro Tools. I
bought the system, had it flown to Kansas, and I
learned how to use it over Christmas break. We
started working on writing the second record in Friday
@y
a
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Yeah, a lot of times. Ive got a mono pedalboard and a Its a weird thing. Do you remember the Dolby A noise
stereo pedalboard. I can route music to the mono
reduction units? Youd use the Dolby to help control
pedalboard, or to the mono into the stereo, or to the
the noise levels. Somebody modded it so that it would
[Korg] MS-20 or the [Access Music] Virus TI. I can also
just do the height-y thing to the top end. It would
route to the Audio Kitchen spring reverb, which is
compress and boost the top end so you wouldnt lose
fucking badass.
it on tape, but if you didnt decode it on the way back
out youd get this incredible sheen to things. It would
Youre using the Little Labs PCP for your
really bring out the top end. Those things are fun if
routing, as well as to change the line
you find them; but the guys at Standard Audio have
level?
really copped it, and it does the same thing with the
Yeah.
low end. I put that on a stereo bus in Pro Tools. Ill
No patchbay?
send the vocals I want to be really prominent, or
No. Im averse to patchbays. Everybody comes in and asks
background vocals sometimes when I want a polished
where the patchbay is.
sheen to the top end, and blend it in. It adds a
You use the I/O on Pro Tools?
compressed top end thats really lovely. Thats been on
Yeah. Thats why Ive got four [Avid] HD I/Os, for 64 ins
a lot of my projects recently. The Bricasti reverb is on
and outs. Everything is directly patched to the I/O. Ive
something, always. I also have an old Studio
had too many times where its like, Print the mix. You
Technologies AN-2, which I use for widening.
get to the point where theres a tom fill, and its like,
Wheres the floor tom? Then you hit the patchbay and Where specifically do you use the AN-2?
theres the floor tom. What the fuck? I probably should Usually I use it on keyboards. The synths often take up a
have a patchbay, because I do like changing the
lot of space in my stereo image when mixing, so I try
routing; but for the most part I feel like Ill just add
to put them further out as wide as possible. It does an
another interface.
interesting widening thing and Im not really sure how.
Ill use it sometimes on vocals to create something
Are you doing analog summing?
thats less bone dry almost a doubling. You cant really
Yeah, I use [Shadow Hills] The Equinox. I have 30
hear it, but if you take it out its like, Wow. That gets
channels of that for summing. It comes out of that into
used a ton, and the Eventide gets used a ton. Then the
the Manley Massive Passive [EQ]. Sometimes the EQ is
rest is all plug-ins in the box.
on, and sometimes not. I use it mostly for the
transformers. Then the Shadow Hills Mastering One of my favorite things youve done is a
When you bring a session up, do you
Compressor into a Crane Song HEDD and back into Pro
have a standard template you import
track on the Fink record, Hard
Tools, at whatever the native session rate was.
where you always have your favorite
Believer, called Pilgrim. It has such
gr
Yeah.
@y
a
ho
o.
hl
ia
sa
rm
mixing?
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
I have a love-hate relationship with cymbals; more hate All in parallel. That way I have some control over the
than love. A lot of the time theyre just white noise
balances. Ill have an idea in my head about what I
generators, depending on the drummer.
want the kit to sound like. At that point, Ill do
whatever it takes to get it to sound the way I hear it
How do you deal with that?
in my head. Sometimes I can leave it, and sometimes
I work with the drummer to control that [situation]. I
there will be all kinds of crazy shit I do just because
say, Lets talk about the dynamics and the sounds.
I hear something in my head. Whatever it takes to get
When I have the opportunity I work with a really
to that point. Ill be EQ-ing and compressing
good drum tech named Mike Fasano. Hes got an
incredible amount of drum gear and hes got a good
channels. It wouldnt be uncommon for me to route
ear. Ill explain to him, Im not hearing any definition
the kick in and the kick out and any samples to one
between the parts. In the chorus section that needs
aux for the kick drum. The same goes for the snare,
to be much different. Ill go through and hand pick
snare top, and snare bottom. I take many samples,
all the cymbals, all the hats, the rides, and the crashes
compress them, then route them together to the
in order to make sure that I can hear definition in
drum buses, and also send them through parallel
between parts. Thats one of the things I find most
compression buses. If I feel a clean drum bus is a
important about a drum kit. I need to hear the
little spikey I might have the UAD-2 Studer [A800
dynamics. Hes playing the verse on the hat and its
plug-in] on it to smooth it out, and the Roger Mayer,
grooving really well, and now hes going to go to the
which is on crush, to make everything explode. Then
ride because its the chorus. To me, a lot of the time,
Ill take another compressor, like the Vertigo [VSC-2]
its like, Whoa. Where did all the energy go?
or something like that for a more polite compression.
Then Ill balance those three to get to a point where
Right.
I feel like I have energy or vibe, but its not too blown
The ride can be way too dark, or too wash-y, or have
out. Ive got the ability to run something up if I need
nothing going on. All of a sudden your drums fall
a bit more height, or send something harder if I need
apart when it needs to elevate. With the Fink record,
to. Thats how I do the drums. The bass is a similar
Tim [Thornton]s a great drummer, and he has an
thing. Bass guitar will go to one bus, sub-bass will go
amazing ability to deconstruct his parts. Id say,
to another, and then Ill spend a lot of time figuring
Lets just do the kick drum. Hed play the kick
out how to get the sub-bass to work with the bass
drum, and we would record that. Then Id say, Okay,
and the kick drum, to control all the low-end
lets play the top kit. [Hed play] the snare, the alt
information, and how to get everything to sit. Maybe
snare, and the toms, with no cymbals. He had an
Ill do a sideband EQ on the bass and sub bass to duck
amazing ability to play all that and groove, because
down where the kick drums hitting. Not in a really
hed hit his thigh instead of hitting the hat. If you
disco-y or dance music kind of way.
listen really closely, youll hear a lot of him hitting
his thigh. Then Id say, Lets do the brass. Wed Not side-chaining heavily
layer it all in a way so that I had complete sonic Yeah, but for that moment when the spike of the kick
control over the different parts of the kit. I could get
drum hits, maybe it cuts out 100 cycles really super
the kick drum big and loud, he could be really
quick on the bass and the sub bass. You dont hear
graceful and play with brushes on the toms and the
that go away, but you hear the kick drum come
snare, and you can hear all the articulation of that
through for a nanosecond. To me thats the most
without it being washed out. I could really control
important thing to the groove. The groove is of
the cymbals that way. He was game for it. Its a
utmost importance to me. It has to feel really good,
challenge for him, and he loved the end result. Wed
energetic, vibey, or however the song is. That needs
do that and then have different drum kits for one
to come across first. Those items to me are the keys.
part of a song. Wed change things around.
Then Ill look at whether its keyboard-based or
guitar-based. Ill start breaking that up into different
When youre mixing, are you compressing
subgroups so I have a little control over the mix. All
and EQ-ing individually as well as in
the clean guitars to one bus, all the super-saturated
groups of low, mid, and high
guitars to another, all the riffs to another place, all
frequencies or instrument groups?
the percussive keyboards to one group, pads to
Yeah. Ill group items together in a way that makes
another group, noise tracks to another group. I have
sense for me to work on them, where they all have the
the ability to control the mix [with the buses] there.
same harmonic or percussive content. When I put a
A lot of the mix will be on aux groups. Its almost like
session together, Ill route things into certain groups.
live mixing at that point, where Ive got all the basic
Itll start out as basic as drums, percussion, music,
instruments. Ive got the drums, the bass, the keys,
and vocals. Itll start there. Ill route all the drums to
the guitars, and the vocals. Its all there and able to
a drum bus, all the music to a music bus, and all the
be blended and tweaked however I need. If necessary,
vocals to the vocal bus. I have a lot of control when
Ill do some group processing over everything to
Im mixing really quickly. Then Ill expand on that. If
control it all, or give it a vibe so it has some zip. For
Ive got the drums sounding good, Ill open up a
saturated guitar, it wouldnt be uncommon to run
couple of parallel drum buses. Maybe Ill route
them through a [Universal Audio] LA-3A or something
cymbals to the Roger Mayer [RM57], or maybe Ill
like that to get them to gel a little bit, if thats what
route tracks to another compressor.
they need. Sometimes they dont, but other times its
All in parallel?
good for them to be like a wall that comes in.
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
gr
Yeah, absolutely.
hl
ia
sa
rm
ho
o.
@y
a
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Its hard to imagine that anyone under 30, who helmed a Grammy winning (four
awards!) record, might not let it go to their head. But Blake Mills, who produced the
Alabama Shakes Sound & Color (engineered by Shawn Everett, also in this issue), does
not fall into that stereotype in the least. In contrast, hes enthusiastic about making
music, quick to praise the people he collaborates with, and frequently mentions how
grateful he is to work with the people he has. After chatting with Blake during a short
break from a session(where he and his cousin, Jon Peter Lewis, were covering Bob
Dylans Not Dark Yet at Tony Bergs studio), its clear that the success that has come
Blakes way is in direct proportion to his enthusiasm for music, that hes easy to get
along with, and he can clearly communicate his ideas in a way that gets you excited
about them. And thats what a good producer does, right?
Youre also well-known as a guitarist. Well, it really depends. Sometimes Shawns role is more
musical. Sometimes Shawns role is that he creates
Was this an attempt to get more
something, or that he has an idea on how to record
session work as a player, or was the
something, and it becomes a part of the music.
goal to get into production?
It was to get into production. It was me coming out of
a period of time where everything I did was
collaborative being a guitarist in a band [Simon
Dawes], and co-writing the songs with Taylor
[Goldsmith] so it was really a way to try to create
some record that felt inherently like me and my
sensibilities. It was a process for the songwriting, as
well as the sonics in the engineering, to sound the
way I had wanted my music to sound at that time. My
hopes were that someone would hear it and be aware
that this was a part of what I was interested in doing.
There wasnt that much focus on the guitar playing on
that record its serving the writing and production.
gr
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
hl
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
When you say you run into problems, do you mean youre
having to bring tracks more to the center?
If its supposed to be competitive with Rihanna, yeah. In that sense, the power of
mono is real.
I havent had the opportunity to mix anything in mono, but Id be into it. Maybe
not for those reasons. We usually mono the bass, especially when mastering for
vinyl. A lot of the records I do are all built around drum kits and two guitars in
a band, so to give them separation is to give them a chance of being heard
theres only so much space available inside a speaker!
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
Weve definitely added plate or chamber reverbs in some instances, but more as a
flavor or an effect. But to give an example of how Ive used it for stereo spectrum
purposes: when you put on an old record and mute one side, you hear the room
bleed of an instrument that was hard panned to the side thats been muted, and
you get a sense of how little separation there was in the room. So even though
it is supposedly relegated to that side, there is a bit of it bleeding. Not the same
as just panning 45 degrees, because the bleed is a diffuse sound and not close
micd. So one thing I started doing with Shawn was hard panning the close mic
on a guitar to one side, hard panning its room mic to the other side, and trying
to drop the room mic to a level that felt more like a mic in omni on some [other
instrument] thats over on that opposite side.
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
t
t
e
r
e
v
E
n
w
a
Sh
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
Appro
hl
ia
sa
John Baccigaluppi
photo by John
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
hl
Yeah. At first we were just trying to mimic Slayer, or I was super young, like 17. Everyone else there was way
is that there arent any classes. You dont go to class.
something like that. Then we started listening to Pink
You
just do sessions. The only classes we ever had were
older than me, at least 30. Pretty much everybody who
Floyd or Radiohead.
Mr. Everett/(continued on page 58)/Tape Op#115/57
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
Bob Ludwig [Tape Op #105] would show up, or wed I had to pretend I was better, right away. The pressure
do a morning with Elliot Scheiner. The best class you
was on. I was doing that in Banff all night long as
could have, really.
well. Banff was into it. Wed gone on tour, and then I
came back to Banff after that fizzled out. I was there
LC: Yeah, someone with a lot of
again, and this guy who worked on Lord of the Rings,
experience.
Mark Willsher [scoring engineer and mixer], was there.
Yeah, it was really amazing.
I showed him some of the projects Id done. He said
LC: Do you still go back and do programs
he thought Id get along really well with a friend of
there now?
his, Eric Valentine [Tape Op #45]. I really loved that
Yes. Theyve been doing this indie rock program there for
Queens of the Stone Age record [Songs for the Deaf]
a while. It used to be just bands from Canada, but now
hed done. I took a trip down to L.A. and met with
I think its from America as well. They apply, and its
Eric. He said, Oh, if you ever get down to L.A., maybe
an amazing two weeks where everyone gets to write
you can come assist. I was still working at Banff, and
in these music cabins in the middle of the mountains.
I got it in my head that I was going to quit and go to
Broken Social Scene are running it now, so theyre all
L.A. Id been there long enough. I got in my dads old
up there writing songs with everybody. Im in the
van and drove down to L.A. I had maybe a few
studio the whole time and record whatever theyre
thousand dollars saved, so I got a crappy apartment
writing. Its really fun. Its like a vacation for me, even
in Hollywood, and then I called up Eric and said, Hey,
though its the hardest I work all year.
I moved! Do you still need an assistant or anything?
LC: Its nice to know you can give
Hes like, Oh no. No, I already got one, but let me call
something back to the place that
somebody. He called me back and said, Theres this
really informed your career.
guy named Tony. Go to his house tomorrow. I didnt
Yeah. I feel like Im taking [from them] when I go there,
even know his last name. [Berg] I just randomly
because Im still learning. Its fun, because I work
showed up at Tonys house. Tony brought me to his
with a different band every day.
living room and was asking me questions about music
JB: How long are you there for when you
I liked and whatnot. He asked me what Id done. He
do those?
said, Im starting a project tomorrow with Pete Yorn.
Two weeks. Its super intense. Its really fun.
I didnt hire an engineer, so can you just come here?
LC: Banff Centre seems to be all about
The next day I started that record. I was working with
throwing you into sessions.
him forever after that.
Its crazy. Youre recording projects immediately. I think
its unlike any other school Ive heard of ever. When LC: So he trusted you pretty quick?
you get there, you get an automatic tuition, and then Yeah. When I was touring with that band [The Boston
you get a weekly stipend. Then they pay for your food
Post]; we got stuck in some town in Canada for a
and your housing.
while and Id run out of money. Id seen that there
was a job opening at a radio station for a Pro Tools
JB: That never will happen in America.
engineer. I went to apply for this job and had this
When I left Banff, I had saved money. Thats how I
really weird interview. I realized halfway through the
moved to L.A. I was debt free.
interview that hed screwed up my resume and
LC: Was Tony Berg the first person you
thought I was interviewing to be the DJ. He was like,
hooked up with before you came
Lets check your voice. I went into the booth and I
down here?
did this crazy voice. He said, That sounds fantastic!
Yeah. I had actually taken a break from Banff. There was
Start on Friday. So I started this show that went to
a famous Canadian boy band called The Moffatts. They
like 6,000 bowling alleys across North America, as well
had moved to my original small town. They were
as all of Canada, the States, and Mexico.
breaking up, so they wanted to do this other thing
with the singer [Scott Moffatt]. They started this LC: A bowling alley show?
project, and I was drumming for this band [The Boston Yeah, it was broadcast to all the bowling alleys. It was
Post], which was a really weird experience. It was a
going for a while. I started going to these bowling
really dramatic and wild period where we toured across
conventions and signing autographs.
Canada. I was probably 19, and they still had this huge LC: Wait a minute! What?
fan base of young girls we were playing for at all these Wed go down to Miami and Id be at these bowling
shows. I was recording that band as well, up in Banff,
conventions. Theyd have these huge posters of my face
so those guys were living in my dorm room. At the
as this bowling DJ. When I went back to Banff, he
time, they were still really famous, so it was my first
wouldnt let me quit. He made me bring a computer that
experience on a big project, even though it was not
would send back the information to him and hed
the way a big project would normally come about. It
satellite it out. Id be doing a session, and every five
was really crazy. They had been famous in Canada since
minutes Id be like, Hold on! Id go in the corner and
they were children. It made me better, immediately,
have to announce a song. Then Id go back and keep the
because the record they recorded a year before
session going. When I was thinking of going to L.A., I
[Submodalities] was produced by Bob Rock. As much as
thought, Oh, Ill make a resume, but Ill be the DJ of my
Banff was doing for me, I had to immediately be way
own resume. So I was doing this voice! I brought it to
better in order to record these guys, because theyd
Tony Berg and he was like, Who the hell is this guy?
been dealing with top people since they were kids.
Now he loves the CD. He keeps it in a frame and shows
it to people when they come. When I came to L.A., the
LC: A super pro situation.
Yeah, it was crazy. I was there every single day, for years
and years.
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Yeah. For the song that was the single, Dont Wanna
Fight, I did this crazy thing. The mix thats on the
album is almost an exact replica of the rough mix, but
its an all-analog version. It really did help that one.
Then theres a song like the first song, Sound &
Color, where I did the same thing and it didnt help
at all.
gr
@y
a
ho
o.
these famous people to play on it, so for a couple of LC: Were there discussions where any
weeks I got to record Bob Dylan, Randy Newman, and
band members felt marginalized by
more who were on that record. That was really fun.
the process?
LC: So now youve won a Grammy [Best No, I dont think anyone felt marginalized. I guess Id
Engineered Album, Non-Classical,
be speaking for them, but not that Im aware of. I
for Sound & Color]?
think maybe there was a little bit of nervousness, like,
Yeah! I dont know how that happened.
Maybe this is too much of a departure for some
LC: I thought that was such a coolpeople. Not that they didnt like it, but there were
sounding record. Its such a
concerns. I was blown away the whole time. I couldnt
departure from the first album.
believe we were getting away with it. We handed in
Yeah. I dont know; I wasnt really thinking much about
the album and it was mastered. I was like, Really?
that. I dont think anyone was. Brittany Howard
Were done?
[vocals, guitar] spearheaded that change. There were LC: Nobody said, Can you fix this for
songs she wrote, and thats what they were. Shes such
radio? Cmon.
a creative person. Shes never going to rest on one Yeah, I thought at some point someone would say,
thing. She could go in any direction. She just has a
Super mixer here is now going to do this thing.
unique, interesting, wild voice. I dont think she was JB: You mixed it all too?
even thinking about doing something like her first Yeah. I felt like I was renegade mixing or something the
record. Whatever she thinks is cool is what she
whole time. I sent in mixes and my teeth would be
wanted to do, which is also reflected in who she hired
chattering. Somehow I just kept getting away with
to do the record with her. Blake was a big name, as
everything.
far as guitar players, but as far as production, he LC: Were you and Blake conferring on
hadnt done a record of that size. The fact that she
ways to approach the mixes?
heard the music he had done, thought he was so cool, Yeah. When we were tracking, we had a pretty specific
and wanted to work with him, that speaks to what
idea of what it was going to sound like. The mixes
shes into as well.
werent a wild departure from what we were doing in
LC: Did Blake rope you in for the project?
the room. Im pretty much mixing the whole time Im
Yeah. Wed worked together tons. Wed done so many
recording. Its hard for me to actually work without it
albums together. He probably played guitar on 39 of
almost sounding like a done album. A lot of times Im
the 40 records I did with Tony. Wed become great
tracking with mastering compressors on my master
friends. I had done his solo record, Break Mirrors,
bus the whole time. Im constantly A/B-ing between
which Brittany had somehow heard. She liked that
other records. I want it to sound like another record
record, and I had done that, so thats how I ended up
the entire time Im working on it. Thats just how my
on Sound & Color.
brain works. By the time I left that studio, I wouldnt
LC: Were you guys dividing some of the
have been bummed if those were the mixes that had
work up, as far as production?
been on the record.
Blake and I? I guess weve been working together for so JB: Did any of the early rough mixes
long that we have our own roles that we play, as far
survive and end up on the record?
as how we work. We fall into that pattern. Its a great Yeah, there are probably about two mixes on the record
working relationship, because I fill in the technical
that are almost what we left the studio with.
areas when hes got his attention on some other part. LC: Where were you tracking the initial
Its a really fun relationship to have. Its like were two
sessions at?
different clouds that fill in each others spots.
We were at Sound Emporium in Nashville. We did it in
LC: You were given a lot of free rein to
chunks; work two weeks, take a break, two weeks,
really work and morph the tracks and
take a break.
hl
ia
sa
rm
the band.
LC: Then you had a month at Ocean Way No, its not a reverb. It sounds like a room. Its
incredible. Its hard to get a reverb plug-in to do what
Oh, yeah; completely. Total free rein to experiment. Its
[now United Recording, Tape Op
that plug-in does.
cool, because she was just down with anything that
#106], right? Holy shit.
sounds cool. So many people will think there are Yeah. I thought, This album could be done, but heres LC: I love reverbs that tail on for two and
certain things you have to do the professional way,
a half seconds and do weird shit, but
a month of studio time. This is the best record Ive
like, Now were going to mix it and make it punchier!
there are times when youve got that
ever worked on! I could experiment for a month.
She doesnt care about that, at all. Shell listen to
dry, dead tambourine track or
They had all this great gear. I was doing the mixes inrough mix one and say, I like that. Whatever is cool
something...
the-box, for the most part, while we were at Sound
is whats going to happen. We would be experimenting
Emporium, so I wanted to do a real console mix after You dont want a reverb. You dont want it to feel like
and trying anything. It was this perfect scenario where
its right in front of your ears. Im obsessed with it. I
that. I was trying to use all their analog gear to do
everyone was into doing it a unique way. Remarkably
was doing it before with re-amping, but Id always
the mix.
the label, their management, them [the band], Blake, LC: Replace the plug-ins?
end up with this re-amping effect. It can be harsh and
me we all were down with this. Therere so many Yeah. I would be doing all these weird experiments to
not really what I want. That plug-in seems to do
times you work on things and, at some point along the
another thing, which is put up a microphone that I
figure out how to get all these mixes to be exactly like
line, it gets compromised. For this record it seems like
forgot to put up while I was tracking. I had a lot of
what I had in-the-box, which was kind of fun. With
that never happened. It seemed like we were all on a
room mics wed recorded; then Id put it on the room
Waves Q-Clone [plug-in] you can visually measure EQ.
train and there was an endpoint, and we all were in it
mic, and the room mic would suddenly sound better.
If I had a Pultec plug-in on, I could see what the
together the entire time.
JB:
Is the plug-in set mono or stereo?
Pultec plug-in had done EQ-wise on the Q-Clone. If
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Stereo, usually. I can set the mix however much I want Yeah, it seems like it went crazy all of a sudden.
Yeah. Its never when Im tracking. I feel like maybe its
of the fake room in there. On Brittanys vocals, I tried LC: Do you feel like people are
easier to get away with things when youre tracking,
to track with her in the large room. I was trying to do
because people havent lived with rough mixes. The
understanding why that record is a
that Bowie thing.
experimental approach when Im tracking something,
success?
people can get on board, because it amps up the
LC: Like Heroes?
Thats a good question. I dont know. On that record
creative flow in the room, and everybody can jump
there are so many reasons why I feel like it was a
Not as many mics. I wasnt doing that thing. Id have
on. That becomes what it sounds like. But [its more
success. Its her songwriting, and its their story. All of
the room mics, but there wouldnt be any compression
challenging] when somebody brings you a project and
those things lined up. It was all waiting to happen. I
on them. When she was quiet, they wouldnt really be
youre supposed to mix it, and theyve already been
could have recorded that record with an iPhone and it
doing anything, and when she was loud, they would
living with rough mixes and things like that. So then
could have done just as well. The fact that they had
trigger. I would only be sending the room mics to the
the experimental approach doesnt always work.
such ammunition behind them going into it, I think
chamber so that when she sang loud, the room mics
Youre battling what people are used to listening to.
that maybe it allowed me to get away with things
triggered the chamber. That way she doesnt have her
Then you can go way too deep. People can be like,
that you couldnt get away with on another record.
voice smothered in reverb the whole time, and when
What the hell are you doing?
LC: Obviously we have to look at every
shes loud it feels epic.
client situation that comes down the LC: Are you getting many projects that
pike as new to us. Clean the slate.
are just mixing lately?
Yeah, lots of mixing projects.
@y
a
ho
o.
Not really. I was trying to do it naturally by letting the Right. I was in New York, and this guy had this
room do that. It was just happening.
electronic project. He sent me files and said he loved
the sound of the Shakes record and asked me to mix
LC: Thankfully everyone stayed on the
it. It was full-on electronic music. I sent the mixes
same page making Sound & Color.
back to him, and hes like, This doesnt sound like the
I didnt actually realize how big Alabama Shakes were
Shakes record! I said, No, it doesnt at all. Of course
when I was doing the album. I didnt really feel that
not! He said, Do it again, and mix it like the Shakes
kind of pressure even though, at some point along the
record. Im like, What do you want me to do with
line, someone told me, Oh, their last album sold a
it? I actually had no idea how to make it sound like
million records. Thats a lot of records! Theyre so
the Shakes record. Do you want me to re-record it
down to earth that you dont feel that energy when
again with that band? There were definitely weird
youre with them. It didnt feel like I was working on
things that we were doing. A lot of the guitars arent
a record where it was like, This album has the
amped. Its just that Korg 4-track tape machine. The
potential to be very big, or this is a catastrophe.
drum tone on one of the songs is that.
Theyd have their friends come over and do some
cooking, or something like that. It felt very much like LC: Now we know the secret! Thats all
a family album. I never really felt the pressure, or was
you need. Not a great song or
worried about the album. It felt like one of the
performance. If you start looking at
smoothest, most natural recordings Ive ever worked
recording as having rules, youre
on. Drama-free, super easy, and no problems.
probably missing the point.
LC: Maybe theyre able to keep it at bay Yeah. If there were rules involved in recording, if I just
had to go set up a microphone, have it go directly to
for their own mental health.
Pro Tools, and then record that, I would hate this job.
Yeah. Maybe thats also why the people responded to the
That is completely not why Im interested in doing
record. I mean, it wasnt stress-free, but comparatively
this job. I would rather work at a grocery store. The
to most records I work on, it was very relaxing.
creative part of it is why Im into it.
LC: Like you say, it could have been
gr
turned into a, You think thats good LC: Have you ever felt you have to be
enough? kind of scenario. Is that a
tempered a little bit with an artist or
million dollar vocal?
client, where youre trying to do
something and they say, No.?
Brittany was recording a lot of the record on these crappy
hl
ia
sa
rm
microphones she got on eBay. I wasnt even recording No, I dont think really ever. It was these situations
her vocal well, or properly. And still people were like,
where all the people I met and worked with kept
The vocals are glorious. You realize that its not
evolving in that way. I never felt like I ended up on a
anything youre doing its the person youre recording.
project where it felt like it was this really conservative
Another recording engineer might have come in and
project. Thankfully it never happened. I accidentally
arrested me. She has a sacred voice. Theres no reason
stumbled into these situations with musicians I kept LC: Challenges.
you should be recording it like that, with a $10
meeting, and their friends were like-minded in a way Yeah. The Local Natives were here and were like, Are
microphone in the control room and the speakers
that it never really happened. Im borrowing from
you sure? We did a song, and it turned out great. We
blasting. Thats not the way to be recording her voice!
approaches Ive done on other records with every
got super experimental. We got a ladder and were
album I start. But all of a sudden, in a few days, Ive
tracking on the roof. Because its an industrial
LC: That freedom is so important.
figured out a new thing thats specific to this project
neighborhood there are no noise constraints, so we
Sessions can get too uptight, too
that I never really tried before. Whether its a piece of
set up drums on the road and were recording on the
scary, with too much fear.
gear, or a unique way of doing something. But as far
road. Then we had band members across the street
Yeah. Its amazing to work on a record where theres no
as people tempering me, that has happened, but
with microphones, moving them around, and holding
fear. She is fearless.
usually its with mixing.
them. We were trying everything.
LC: Thats good. After this record started
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Yeah, late at night. We took over the road. Then this ballerina showed up out of nowhere.
She was dancing. Then a rapper showed up, and he was rapping. I was recording and I
heard rapping. The guy was rapping in the middle of the take. It was amazing.
LC: Thats surreal. Are you sure David Lynch wasnt running
around out there somewhere?
Yeah, it felt like David Lynch! On their demo, they had this one song that had this filtered
effect. The drums kept weaving in and out of these filters. Instead of using filters, we
had all these water jugs. We filled them up with water and put [Shure SM]57s in condoms.
I micd the drums normally, and then put the water drums in all the same spots as where
the mics were. I had two different versions of the drum set, so when they wanted to do
their filtering effect that theyd done on their demo, Id bring up one kit or the other so
you could do it without using EQ.
It sounded so cool. It sounded like you filtered all the high-end off, just like you would
with an EQ, but it had this weird kind of reverberant water echo thing. It was like what
theyd done on their demo, but a more unique and interesting version. How many times
have you heard a drum get filtered? Boring. If you can do the same thing, but approach
it in an analog way, thats where its a real version of that. The Beatles could have done
the same effect. It sounded cool. It was fun.
LC: What informed some of the gear choices for your space? I
noticed the MCI 2-inch deck over there, and the small console.
Oh, yeah. Pretty much everything has a different reason. Theres a guy across the street who
sells gear, and we needed a 2-inch. That was the easiest way of getting one here, just
walk it across the street. I wanted some kind of console in here. Theyre selling these API
1608 consoles right now, so I bought one. Ive always loved the look of the white APIs
visually; the old ones.
gr
Yeah. I love the way they look. That is the coolest-looking console Ive ever seen, and I
love the sound of API as well. If I somehow expand this space, Ill see if theres someone
I can sell this one to and buy that one.
JB: Are you mixing through it, or using it for tracking, or both?
ho
o.
Both.
LC: I was talking to the Lucius crew about working with you, and
I know you kept getting dragged away to work on Sound &
Color.
Yeah, we were in here doing Lucius Good Grief album. That was fun. Theyre starting to be
in-demand session singers, on top of their career [as a band].
@y
a
LC: They [Jess Wolfe and Holly Laessig] sound great, right? Its a
special thing.
I dont know if Im supposed to say this on the interview, but Blake and I are doing a record
right now I dont think I can tell you who it is and we just brought them in for all
the background vocals. They sounded great.
hl
ia
sa
rm
Im doing the Growlers album. Im working with Julian Casablancas, from The Strokes, on
his record. And Broken Social Scene, though I dont know if its going to work timingwise.
LC: Are you keeping enough time for yourself to stay sane?
Not really. Its been too crazy. I get locked in these rooms.
LC: If you werent recording, do you have any idea what youd
be doing?
Oh, yeah. Id probably be making movies, or animating, or painting. As soon as I
find a day of not working, which is never, I love doing anything creative. There
have been times when Ive found weeks where Ill start writing, or painting, or
making model trains. Id love to make movies. There are a million things. Id like
to live ten thousand years, because Id selfishly like to do it all. Recording is what
I fell into, and I absolutely love it; but I absolutely love everything. As soon as
I start listening to a podcast about something, Im fully invested. I love to learn
about everything, but I have to pick one thing or else itll be a disaster.
A little bit. When people dont have somebody, Ill play. I have no idea how to play
guitar Im horrible. I love playing guitar on peoples records, but they have to
go away. Ill take an old African record, or something like that, and Ill find a
guitar moment. Then Ill put that in Pro Tools, and Ill Melodyne the part so it fits
the chords of the song Im working on. I know mathematically how a guitar works,
like where it all is. From the Melodyne Ill create a MIDI structure of the guitar
part I want, and then Ill loop bars and learn each, bar by bar, of the guitar part,
and then Ill go down the line on the whole song.
No, not one by one. Ill try to learn the parts so it sounds like a human playing. Ill
record with DI and then spit that DI performance back out into an amp so it
sounds like one performance, not all edited. Then I have this wild, Africansounding guitar part that sounds really accomplished.
gr
Yeah, but when I was a kid I was really interested in animating. Ill watch behind
the scenes videos about people animating. I think thats so cool, frame-by-frame.
It makes my brain intrigued. Theres something about approaching music that
way, almost like animating, that I get off on. Even though I dont play guitar, Ill
make whole songs on guitar, or instruments that I dont know how to play, and
Ill animate my way through the whole song.
Ill make my own songs. Ill never release any of it its just experiments I dont get to try
with other people. Then I can bring them to other peoples records.
LC: I find if I get left with time like that I dont work
conventionally. Ill throw one mic on the drum kit and see
what happens.
Totally. Sometimes I just record with one mic to fuck with myself.
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
Yeah. Ill have a cool sound in one mic, but if I record all the other mics, then Im
going to turn them on. If I dont have them... Years ago, some friends of mine
did this record with Mark Ronson [Tape Op #105]. They called me in to finish
engineering and mixing. He was there, and they had done the thing at the
Daptones studio. I opened up the session and there were four tracks: drums, bass,
guitar, and vocals. Mark was there, and I was like, Is this how you did the Amy
Winehouse record [Back to Black]? Mark said, Yeah. It was a big moment for
me. I remember hearing that Amy Winehouse record, and I couldnt believe how
good those drums sounded. I thought it was an old record. How did they do this?
After that, I was like, Fuck it. I dont need 16 microphones. Mark was showing
me. Hed say, We just EQd it like this. Hed crank one of the API EQs. You want
more kick drum? Just wildly aggressively EQ-ing. Oh yeah, theres the kick
drum. I love guys who are that successful, but so reckless. Theyre not thinking
about it in this mathematical cut-and-dry way of approaching something. He
didnt seem like he was working that way, at all. He seemed like he was a reckless,
wild man whos a cool dude. He has a pop sensibility that the world recognizes,
but hes not approaching it in any standard way at all.
ho
o.
LC: Every bit of the song is just a little tiny moment in time.
hl
LC: I assume that you have management for your jobs and your
work?
Yeah. Thats super helpful. I literally would not charge anybody for anything. Id say, Yes
to everything and do everything for free. I just get excited about sessions. Oh yeah, well
figure it out. r
<subtlemcnugget.com>
Focusrite
gr
ia
sa
hl
AMS Neve
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
Cloud Microphones
hl
gr
ia
sa
ho
o.
PreSonus
@y
a
Crane Song
rm
www.tapeop.com
Universal Audio
ho
o.
@y
a
ia
sa
hl
gr
rm
JBs End Rant and RADAR studio review in this issue inspired me
to share with you a few of the software utilities I install whenever
I set up a new Windows computer. If youre a DAW user moving
between OS platforms, muscle-memory might lead you to type the
wrong keyboard shortcuts. Thankfully, there are many remapping
tools available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. On Windows, Ive
been using KeyTweak by Travis Krumsick (a free download from
<www.bleepingcomputer.com> and other sources) for as long as I
can remember. I use it to swap Caps Lock and Left Ctrl, but you
could also use it to swap Ctrl, Alt, and Windows keys to make a
Windows keyboard work more like a Mac one. (Likewise, if you have
an actual Mac keyboard connected to your PC, you could remap
accordingly.) KeyTweak writes your mapping to the Windows
Registry, so once youve saved your mapping, you can quit (or even
delete) the program, reboot the computer, and your mapping will
be live. This approach means that KeyTweak is limited to modifying
the global keyboard layout; therefore, if you want to do things like
fire off macros or handle combined keystrokes, youll need a
different program that runs as a background service, intercepting
and reprocessing your inputs. For that, I use AutoHotKey
<www.autohotkey.com>, a free macro creator/handler for
Windows. The system relies on scripts, so any keystrokes, mouse
buttons, or combinations thereof or even sequences of text
can trigger scripted actions. You can even do complex things, like
receive input, then analyze which window is active, and launch
commands specific to that window. On macOS, I use Karabiner
<www.pqrs.org> to remap keys and shortcuts. A text editor
(versus a word processor) is tremendously useful for modifying
preference files; EDL, marker, and cue files; and other XML and
XML-like resources. Ive been a GNU Emacs <www.gnu.org> user
since the mid-80s, when I worked as an undergrad researcher in
Richard Stallmans office at the MIT AI Lab. OS-integrated,
precompiled binaries of GNU Emacs are available for macOS and
Windows, but you can also download the source code and compile
it yourself. GNU Emacs includes a full programming environment
(with its own Turing-complete language, a dialect of Lisp), and
there are countless free extensions available that make it more
than just a text editor. Over the decades, Ive written thousands of
lines of Emacs Lisp to customize Emacs to my liking.
Scriptable, command-line interfaces are great for manipulating
groups of files; if you rely on the Terminal app in macOS, you know
what I mean. Windows 10 Anniversary Update includes an
installable Bash shell based on Ubuntu Linux. As a sandboxed app,
it has its pros and cons. An alternative is Red Hat Cygwin
<www.cygwin.com>, a natively-integrated, Linux-like environment
for Windows. POSIX compatibility for system calls means it can
interact directly with application, file, and system resources.
Within Cygwin (and in macOS too), I use SoX
<sox.sourceforge.net> to batch-process audio files, mostly for
transcoding, mono/stereo conversion, and polarity adjustment;
but its capable of all sorts of offline audio processing. The
default Windows and macOS backup solutions arent adequate for
implementing a trustworthy studio-backup scheme, especially
with multiple computers and even portable devices in use. Siber
Systems GoodSync <www.goodsync.com> is a comprehensive file
synchronization tool for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and
Android. I use it to back up all of my computers to my Synology
RAID servers, and for inter-device synchronization too. Moreover,
I also rely on GoodSync for cloud sync. On that front, GoodSync
is much more stable than Google Drive client software. Drive
crashes often, and it can sometimes prevent the computer from
shutting down or going to sleep bad for laptops. Ive lost work
due to Drive client software, but Ive never lost a file due to
GoodSync in the many years Ive been using it. AH
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Dont you just love things that are simple? Aston Microphones believes that reflection filters
should be simple easy to use, lightweight... and purple. Since the introduction of the SE
Electronics Reflexion Filter in 2006 [Tape Op #56], reflection filters have become more visible in
studios with all of their accessory arms, adapters, and various pieces that inevitably get piled
up in the corner behind the mic stands. Reflection filters are intended to absorb and diffuse some
of the sound energy that would otherwise enter the capsule uninhibited from the rear side of the
mic. Unlike any of the other reflection filters Ive seen on the market that primarily handle sounds
approaching along the horizontal plane, the hemispherical, bowl-like Aston Microphones Halo
filters sound approaching the rear of the mic from all angles, which is a significant advantage
over designs that fail to address reflections from low-ceilings in bedroom-sized spaces.
When I first pulled the 21 18 9 Halo from the box, I was not surprised that it was purple,
but I was surprised at its sturdy, yet low-mass form. Including the mounting hardware, the Halo
is lighter than a standard tripod mic stand, which makes it notably less clumsy than some of the
heavier reflection filters on the market if youve used these, you know what Im talking about!
The Halos purple colored, acoustically architected structure is molded from a felt-like material
made from PET (polyethylene terephthalate) fibers manufactured from recycled plastic bottles.
The softly sculpted unit looks rather inviting and much less like some kind of Imperial weapon
from Star Wars, like others before it do. The mounting hardware is made of finely milled metal,
and its easily adjustable. The hardware allows you to use a single mic stand to hold the Halo and
the mic, or to use two separate stands, one each for the Halo and mic.
In use, the Halo attenuated the sound of the room in vocal tracks recorded with a largediaphragm condenser mic in cardioid mode the foundation for my evaluation. In addition to
using the Halo in standard studio scenarios, I really wanted to see what the reflection filter could
do in some of the worst rooms I could find at home. As to be expected, my kitchen and bathrooms
had the highest incidences of unwanted room reflections.
It wouldnt be my first choice to track vocals in a small, tiled, 25 sq ft bathroom, so this is
where I started. I should note here that the amount of filtering at the backside of the mic is
adjustable by sliding the mic closer to the inside of the Halos bowl shape. Because the width of
this bathroom is only 4 ft, and the corresponding reflections were so fast, I opted to slide the
mics back as close to the inside of the reflection filter as it would go (less than an inch) and
really get my head as far into the bowl of the Halo, without my mouth being too close to the
mic. The difference in these test vocals with and without the reflection filter (both recorded at
the same distance from the mic) was striking. The Halo really helped to mitigate the washy
character of the bathroom, and it sounded pretty damn close to an iso-booth!
Our large, open kitchen with 10.5 ft ceilings is dimensioned like a geometric cube also not
ideal for recording. Again, I played with the mic spacing within the reflection filter to tune how
much room sound I wanted to let in. And again, comparisons revealed an improvement in vocal
presence and clarity. Our back bedroom is low, with 7 ft ceilings a definite no-no for recording
a vocalist thats over 6 ft tall. I did it anyway, and it worked. Another note the Halos bowl-like
structure is wider than tall. It was interesting to experiment with rotating the filter 90 to get a
little more filtering on the ceiling/floor reflections than the wall reflections again, really helpful
results. In summary, I was able to capture forward-sounding vocal tracks in really bad rooms!
Back in a professional studio environment, the Halo performed well and was incredibly easy
to set up. At times, depending on the mic choice, I had to grab an extra stand for a pop filter
which is no big deal for me, because Ill often do that anyway. I prefer the sound of an openroomed vocal for some music genres, but hip hop artists, for example, typically like a very up
front and isolated vocal. In the past, the iso-booth was an absolute requirement for recording
vocals in this genre, but with the Halos filtering in our main live room, I feel like I can capture
a less boxy sound than tracks recorded in the iso-booth. Voiceover work in our smaller room
and in my project studio also benefitted from the Halo. Unfortunately, with both hip hop and
voice work, artists and voice talent often need to be able to read from portable devices and paper
scripts. Like all reflection filters that Ive used, the Halo obscures the field of vision somewhat,
which can be challenging at times.
A reflection filter can be a handy tool for partial isolation of a vocal mic when the singer is
tracking in the live room with the band. In other words, the filter can reduce the instrument bleed
making it into the vocal mic. But interestingly, it also works the other way around. On one
occasion, I was able to use the Halo on the singers mic to prevent extraneous bleed of the scratch
vocal into the drum overheads.
In addition to vocals, the Halo spent time on guitar amps, bass drums, room mics, and other
sources. On guitar amps, surrounding the backside of a (figure-8 pattern) ribbon mic with the
Halo made for some interesting results (both on and off-axis). An LDC in cardioid pulled deep
into the Halo and placed in front of the kick drum was punchier than sans filter, and even the
snare bleed was reduced. An omni room mic between the drum kit and a flat wall offered a bigger
feel with a nicely controlled cymbal wash.
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
Aston Microphones
hl
$4700 Direct
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Hafler
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
especially for older stereo recordings where stuff is hardpanned right and left and can be unpleasant when heard
through headphones.
Compared to the headphone amp built into my Hilo, I much
preferred how both Hafler amps sounded driving my
headphones. I noticed a fuller sound at lower levels, and super
clear and clean sound as loud as I wanted to drive them. The
Hilo doesnt drive the Sennheiser HD-650 very well; its
designed for lower-impedance cans.
The built-in headphone amp of my Benchmark DAC2 HGC
converter [Tape Op #97, #111] gave the Haflers a run for the
money, sound-wise. But the Haflers, being purpose-built, win
on features. It was informative, though, to compare the
Benchmark when both Hafler amps had their Focus controls
(and Feedback on the HA75) bypassed via the front-panel
switches. It took some time to exactly adjust output levels for
what sounded like a proper A/B/C comparison, using the
Benchmark as the DAC and feeding the Haflers from the
Benchmarks two unbalanced outputs. But once I had what
sounded like the same levels driving the phones, no matter
what socket I plugged into, I heard a little bit of flavor from
each different amp not exactly the same sound qualities. I
would describe them this way: super-clean but thinnest out
of the Benchmark; clean and fast with a little meat out of
the HA15; and more colored but in a pleasing way, bigger
without annoying exaggeration out of the HA75. The
differences were more pronounced through the Sennheiser
HD-650, but I heard the same qualities through the AudioTechnica ATH-M50.
I think the HA15 hits the sweet spot for many pro-audio
uses. The Focus control is a useful innovation, and the Radialstyle build quality is tough enough for any situation where
youd dare take a microphone or computer. The high-quality,
clean and powererful amplifier will be a step up for most
setups, and you will likely get better mixes that play nicely in
a wider range of listening environments.
The HA75 is a really nice piece of gear. I think, at that price
point, and considering there is a semi-fragile tube inside, it
might not be ideal for live recording or other on-the-go uses
(its also about twice as large and twice as heavy as the HA15).
But as a headphone-playback system with sound-sculpting
controls to enhance listening enjoyment, its quite the thing.
The sound quality is clean enough when the feedback control
is bypassed to make it a reliable monitoring tool. I think the
version with the built-in DAC will find a wider market. That
said, I will miss listening to the review unit after its shipped
back to Radial. Its one of the nicest-sounding headphone
amps Ive ever heard.
One final note on the history of Hafler: Radial Engineering
recently showed a prototype of the Dynaco ST-70 tube
amplifier, a complete redesign that includes none of the
original built-to-low-cost compromises (but also features a
much higher price). Janis says more Dynaco-branded products
are in the pipeline. Its nice to see David Haflers legacy in
capable hands, and a familiar brand return to the world of pro
audio. (HA15 $449 street, HA75 $999; www.hafler.com)
Tom Fine <tom.fine@gmail.com>
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
iZ Technology
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
Moreover, iZ hasnt stopped there, because the soon-to-bereleased RADAR Session app will give you multi-touch control
over Pro Tools using a standard (20 or larger) touchscreen
monitor. We have our RADAR studio set up with our main Apple
Cinema Display mounted behind the mixing console, and an
inexpensive ($200) touchscreen monitor attached to a rolling cart
for the Session Controller or Mac keyboard. This gives us multiple
control and viewing options when using Pro Tools (despite Pro
Tools only supporting single-touch while we await the release of
RADAR Session).
Two-channel AES3 and S/PDIF, along with SMPTE LTC and MIDI
I/O, are on every model above the base RADAR studio computer.
(SMPTE and MIDI only work in RADAR Mode.) There are lots of
multi-channel digital options, including MADI, AES3, TDIF, and
ADAT. Of course, with the reputation that iZ has built on its
converters, many users are going to want the Classic 96 or Ultra
Nyquist converters from iZ. Both versions come in banks of eight
channels, and a single RADAR studio maxes out at 24 channels of
iZ converters, but multiple RADAR studio computers can be
synched together for more channels. With that said, RADAR studio
being a PC opens up a lot more possibilities and can get you out
of the box, so to speak. Because it has PCIe slots, you can drop a
Pro Tools | HD Native card or any other Windows-compatible PCIe
card (from the likes of Avid, RME, Lynx, Focusrite, SSL, etc.) in the
system. A full-blown 24-channel RADAR studio system is close to
$10,000, but you can get a RADAR studio with no converters for
just under $3,000. You might ask, Why would I buy a RADAR
without converters? Well, if you are thinking you need a new Mac
for your Pro Tools rig, and then you realize that your HD Native
card wont work with the new Mac Pro computers, that cost much
more than a RADAR studio, unless you buy an expansion chassis
and that iZ offers 9 more years and 275 more days of free tech
support than Apple youd agree that RADAR studio is a very
cost-effective alternative to Mac-based systems.
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
have any questions, youll have a 10-year window to call iZ and ask
them how to delete files or unmount drives. Ive since made a cheat
sheet for the studio that explains the most common functions that
Mac users may need to know when working in Windows. But, its
important to point out that Pro Tools in Windows is pretty damn
close to Pro Tools in macOS. And iZ has gone one step further by
offering a keyboard setting that remaps the modifier keys to work
like a Mac. You can even plug in an actual Mac keyboard into RADAR
studio, and your Pro Tools (or other DAW) keyboard commands will
work as expected. In other words, there is almost no learning curve
with RADAR studio, Pro Tools, and a Mac keyboard.
Finally, when our RADAR studio arrived, I had a client in the
studio who had brought his own recording system (Samplitude
on a Windows PC, for what its worth), so I took advantage of
our studio computer being free and decided to upgrade our Mac
Pro tower to Pro Tools | HD 12. I also bought a Mac Mini to run
PT 12 to have a ready-to-go backup for our Mac Pro. I spent
several days installing software and plug-ins on all three
machines, and I would have to say that, despite having never
used a Windows PC, our RADAR studio was the easiest to deal
with. Ironically, the Mac Mini with the latest macOS (OS X El
Capitan) had the most issues and was the biggest headache. My
advice dont be scared of Windows, especially the superoptimized installation on RADAR studio.
Speaking of plug-ins, I quickly learned that most of the major
plug-in companies, like Sound Toys, UAD, Sonnox, Eventide,
Wave Arts, Waves, Valhalla, etc., support Windows. I lost more
plug-ins migrating from PT 10 to 12 than I did switching from
macOS to Windows. Sure, if youre still in PT 10 on a Mac, you
may lose a few RTAS plug-ins, or you might have to spend a
chunk of change updating them to 64-bit AAX versions from
vendors like Waves. But the bottom line is, if you have licenses
for 64-bit AAX plug-ins, you will most likely have download
access to Windows versions of those plug-ins.
Bock Audio
IFET condenser mic
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
Tape Op is made
possible by our
advertisers.
hl
tapeop.com
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
All controls are stepped for precise recall and have a nice feel when turned. On the Attack knob,
every other setting is Comp Off which allows the user to A/B between the desired attack setting
and the compressor bypassed, with one click of the knob and back. This control is similar (in how you
use it) to the Hold feature introduced by EMI in the RS124, which also makes an appearance on the
Liverpool. Every other setting of the Recovery knob is for Hold, which is effectively an infinite release
time. Hold was intended to prevent the RS124s output from recovering while compressing a mix. This
was primarily used to keep the quiet ending of a song (or the noise following the last note) from swelling
up in volume. As the song ends, the engineer would click the Recovery knob one position left or right
to engage Hold. Hold was also useful for the beginning of a song in a two-pass approach, especially if
the song had a strong initial transient. In the first pass, after the song kicked in, the engineer would
engage Hold and then stop the tape machine in a way, priming the RS124. On the second pass,
the engineer would start in Hold mode, then switch to the desired Recovery time after the songs first
notes came through. This technique was employed to prevent an audible thunk on the RS124s initial
clampdown of the signal, as the unit had a relatively slow attack time. However, as is the case with
much gear, you can use the Hold function in unintended ways with fun results. Examples of this use
can be heard on guitar tracks on The Beatles Let It Be (and I am sure on countless other recordings
made at Abbey Road Studios). It just locks the audio in place and holds it there with no pumping. Its
a cool feature both for effect and functional use in leveling as mentioned above.
I used the Liverpool on several sources and found it to be a nice tone-shaper, as well as a useful
compressor, and I tended to want to run guitars through it more than anything else. For example, you
can really cream an acoustic guitar and still have it sound just fantastic with the Liverpool. Even at
2030 dB of reduction, the result was still musical. I set the attack and release times to about medium,
and played with the input and threshold to achieve the right amount of tonal-shaping and squeeze. The
Liverpool imparted a nice, warm, roundness to the midrange, and it smoothed out any pokiness, helping
the processed track sink right into the mix. Clamping down on a fuzzed-out White Albumsounding
electric guitar track with the Hold function was a treat. It was that sound. In more gentle use, the
Liverpool did its job and added color and character to guitars if desired, and less so if backed off a bit.
If you have recorded a guitar sound that is similar to those that came out of Abbey Road in the 60s,
the Liverpool will take you that extra mile to get you to the finish line.
I also liked the Liverpool on bass. The tube-y vibe was big, fat, and warm, while definition was
still maintained. The ability to overdrive the input gain to achieve some harmonically pleasing dirt
was a nice bonus. Even at really high gain-reduction (with the meter being completely pegged), the
Liverpool sounded great. The Hold function was also cool used in this application for complete level
lock. Note that this was a specific and intentional choice for a bass tone, and one that was vintage
in effect. For a more pop or contemporary aesthetic, the Liverpool can achieve a nice, fat, sit-in-themix bass sound with plenty of character as well.
Does it do the Beatles drum thing? Yes depending on what you think the Beatles drum thing is.
You can get reasonably squishy-squashy with the Liverpool and dial in some sounds reminiscent of what
the Altec and Fairchild compressors will do when set to achieve such sounds. And remember, when you
are struggling to get that Ringo or John Bonham sound, it may simply be that Ringo or Bonham didnt
play drums on your song. Non-judgmentally, the Liverpool is far from the fastest compressor out there,
and even at extreme attack settings, the transient of a snare hit comes through, in my opinion to nice
effect. Situationally of course, I am confident you can find a use for the Liverpool on almost every mix.
The Liverpool does a nice smooth thing to a vocal, and dialing in useable settings was a snap. It
was very difficult to make this compressor sound bad. I also liked it paired in a double-compression
scenario with an Empirical Labs Distressor [Tape Op #32] for a real in-your-face intimacy. Again, the
ability to shape and add grit with the input stage to some degree was a great option, even when
the Liverpool wasnt employed for dynamic control.
I only had a single unit, so I couldnt use it on mix bus, or on a stereo drum bus, but I found it
flavorful on a mono drum overhead, especially when blended in with the rest of the drums. I also
played around with sending various elements of the kit to the Liverpool in a parallel-compression
scheme, and found that to be useful and fun when situationally appropriate.
Did I mention I liked the ability to drive the input into tube overdrive for character? Only about
a dozen times! Like many tube compressors, the Liverpool can be colorful, and thats a good thing.
If you need transparent utility, there are plenty of compressors that will do the trick and do it well.
The Liverpool delivers control over both dynamic-range and tone, with the ability to drive your signal
into fuzz land. So in many ways, you are getting yourself two boxes in one a compressor and a
color creation tool. I really liked adding some grit to a DI-recorded guitar with this unit, and without
obviously audible compression.
If you want to hear this compressor really working, you can certainly get there. When used tastefully,
it is smooth and a nice tonal addition to a mix. It has an ability to sweetly draw notes and tones out
of an instrument, especially in an open mix with just a few elements, so its effect can really be heard.
In summary, the Liverpool is a high-quality compressor that achieves the familiar compression
characteristics of its family lineage. It is easy to use and has a variety of applications not to
mention that, compared to a modified original Altec, it is very affordable. You know the sound. You
love the sound. Now its possible you can afford the sound.
($1295 street; www.grovehillaudio.com) GS
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Radial Engineering
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
The multichannel Radial Engineering Space Heater rackmount mixer and single-channel Space
Heater 500 module (for 500-series frames) are analog distortion units that offer tube distortion
and transformer saturation from actual tubes and transformers.
The rackmount version is set up as four stereo channels of distortion, with a built-in summing
mixer and headphone amp as well. Inside the 1RU-height chassis are four 12AX7 tubes (each
dual-triode tube can handle two channels) and eight custom-wound Eclipse ET-LD2 transformers
(which are based on Deane Jensens original designs Radial Engineering acquired Jensen
Transformers in 2014). Jam-packed around these tubes and oversized transformers are standard
through-hole components: Burr-Brown line drivers and receivers; Analog Devices op-amps; EPCOS
metallized-polyester-film capacitors; and banks of individual metal-film resistors. Like all of
Radials products, the Space Heater has a chassis fashioned from cold-rolled steel, with a thick,
durable powder-coat finish. Not surprisingly, the unit is heavy 8.5 lb according to my postal
scale despite it being only 6 deep.
The front panel is divided into five sections. There are four sets of stereo channel controls,
and one master section for the summing bus and headphone amp. Each stereo channel includes
pushbuttons to relay-bypass the distortion circuit entirely, enable a 40 Hz high-pass filter, assign
the channel to the summing bus, and switch in Tube Drive. Tube Drive is further controlled with
a three-position Heat switch that chooses 35, 70, or 140 V for the plate voltage of the 12AX7
tube, as well as two concentric potentiometers (one each for odd and even sides of the stereo
channel), with an inner Drive knob for input level and an outer Level knob for output level of
the tube circuit.
The backside is incredibly dense with I/O. There are eight 1/4 TRS balanced inputs, two
balanced XLR outputs for the summing bus, and two 1/4 TRS stereo jacks for linking multiple
units together. Additionally, there are eight pairs of 1/4 TRS send and receive jacks for balanced
inserts. What about the individual channel outputs? These are on a DB-25 socket. The inputs also
show up on a second DB-25 socket (in parallel to the TRS jacks).
The Space Heater 500 module, which takes up one space in a 500-series frame, is similar in
internal componentry, except for a compact Jensen JT-11-YMPC transformer in place of the larger
Eclipse, and Panasonic aluminum electrolytic capacitors. Like its rackmount sibling, it has Drive
and Level knobs to vary the input and output levels of the tube circuit, as well as the same threeposition Heat switch for plate voltage. But unlike its sibling, the 500 modules HPF is sweepable
from 5500 Hz, and a sweepable 500 Hz 20 kHz LPF is also included. While the HPF of the
rackmount version is post-tube, the filters on the 500 module can be switched pre or posttube.
A single In switch bypasses the whole module, but theres no facility to bypass just the tube
circuit and leave in the transformer something the rackmount version can do.
Veteran reviewer Garrett Haines asked to test-drive the rackmount Space Heater in his studio.
I also received a rackmount unit to try in my personal studio, alongside the two Space Heater
500 modules that I had previously purchased. Our two perspectives follow.
AH
GH: Understanding the signal flow of the Space Heater is important. The inputs feed 12AX7
tubes, and each channel has a Heat switch for selecting the plate voltage of its tube. In plainspeak, and of course generalizing lower voltages starve the tube, increasing distortion. The
Drive and Level controls allow you to fine-tune the amount of distortion on each channel. The
high-pass filter affects the signal coming out of the tube circuit, before its fed into the
transformer. You can bypass the tube circuit and drive just the transformer. After the transformer
is the send/receive loop for inserting external processors before the Space Heaters summing bus.
When summing, there are no pan pots, so the left side of each stereo channel goes to the left
side of the summed output, and the right to the right. If four stereo channels (for four stems)
are not enough, the summing matrix can be expanded by adding additional Space Heater units
via the link jacks. Four units can be chained for a total of 16 stereo pairs (32 tracks) of summing.
I like that Radial prints the DB-25 pinout on the rear panel, which is a big deal since there
is not a single standard for DB-25 connectors. There are analog, digital, and even some more
variants from the likes of TASCAM, Yamaha, and Avid/Digidesign. Anyone who suggests this
isnt a big deal is welcome to find out what happens when you plug the wrong DB-25 cable into
a powered system. The Space Heater follows the TASCAM analog pinout.
AH: Personally, Im a big fan of D-sub connectors for multi-pair audio lines, as theyre cheaper
to manufacturer than individual cables and easier to handle. Plus, there are plenty of
multichannel converters and studio patchbays that rely on DB-25 so wiring can really be a
breeze. I havent had any personal mishaps due to misconnecting DB-25 cables, like Garrett has,
but all of my gear with DB-25 analog sockets from TASCAM, Radial Engineering, SSL, Harrison,
Antelope Audio, Dangerous Music, and Switchcraft follow the same TASCAM pinout, which is
now the AES59 standard.
gr
ho
o.
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
By the way, if youd rather not use DB-25 snakes for the channel outputs of the Spacer Heater,
you can use the 1/4 TRS send jacks to simply output the individual post-transformer channels
to wherever. (The only caveat with this scheme is that the relay-bypass feature wont work; in
bypass mode, nothing comes out of the send jacks.)
GH: I only had one unit for this review, so its difficult to draw comprehensive conclusions
about summing. Personally, I prefer a summing mixer that accommodates at least 8 to 12 stereo
stems (16 to 24 tracks), so I would need two or more Space Heaters. However, if you plan to use
it in a variety of ways as a front-end processor, for a monitor mix, or in a live sound rig, for
example as well as for summing, then it begins to make more sense. It makes a great preamp
follower on occasions when the source tracks need just a little more more.
Because the Space Heater is only 1RU high, putting together a multi-unit mixer is entirely
feasible (as long as you leave space between the units for heat dissipation), and there is no
doubt that the transformers go a long way towards achieving a console sound when summing.
Furthermore, the tube drive does range from subtle to slightly overdriven.
For live sound, if you loaned a set of these to the FOH engineer, you wouldnt get them back,
because itd be like taking candy from a baby. Subtle tube distortion plus transformer saturation
would make for a happy audience experience. Furthermore, both features would come in handy
for monitoring. Whether on stage and in the studio, in-ear monitoring is becoming more
common. If you have ever tried IEMs, you can attest that they take some time getting used to,
and they often have a dry, almost sterile sound. Being able to add some drive to the monitoring
mix would be a plus. Thus, a Space Heater would be a killer submixer for foldback. By the way,
the rolled-steel chassis is not only durable, but its also ideal for shielding. This box should
certainly withstand the rigors of travel and professional use.
AH: Actually, I wouldnt recommend using the rackmount Space Heater as your only summing
mixer. Instead, Id suggest using it as a stem or track processor in conjunction with another
summing system. In my mixing workflow, I found the Space Heater was great at gluing things
together. Tiny bits of tube distortion and transformer saturation can go a long way in helping
you achieve the console sound, as Garrett explained already. So you could feed another
summing system into the Space Heater, using the latter to add glue; or you could take the
outputs of the Space Heater and feed a bigger summing system. You could even intermix the two
to create routings for parallel processing.
But with that said, you have to be diligent about polarity (what some people erroneously call
phase) when using the rackmount Space Heater for summing multi-micd instruments (like
drums) or for parallel processing. Each stage of its circuitry inverts the signal. Therefore, if youre
bypassing the tube stage and using only the transformer stage, the channels input and output
polarities will be opposite of each other. Or, if youre bypassing both the tube and transformer
stages on your channel, but still feeding the channel to the summing mixer, the signal from that
channel will be polarity reversed at the summing mixers output.
GH: To get the most out of the Space Heater, I suggest wiring it to an appropriate patchbay.
In addition to facilitating use of the unit with stereo-bus and insert devices, youll also be more
tempted to try it in other situations. As a front-end tone box, the Space Heater was impressive
on a wide variety of sources, especially keyboards and DId bass guitar. Since the controls are laid
out in stereo pairs, consider other stereo sources, such as room mics, synths, backing vocals,
brass sections, or even virtual instruments. Sometimes compressors dont offer the right
coloration (or you might not own enough of them), so the set of tube/transformer channels in
the Space Heater could be just the ticket for almost any musical genre.
AH: Ive used both Space Heater models on a variety of sources during tracking, using it as
Garrett suggests. Most of the time, I prefer 140 V operation. On snare drum, I like to set up just
enough Drive to bring out a tiny bit of thwack courtesy of tube-clipping, which is also a nice,
musical way of limiting the snare signal before it hits my converters. On floor and rack toms, a
bit more Drive adds a little more thwack, while turning up the Level knob adds transformer
resonance. In this manner, toms sound huge, and kick drum mics also respond in a similar way.
On electric guitar, I can add bite at 140 V Heat, or a ton of harmonics and grit at 35 V. On
bass, either micd or DId, careful placement of the Drive knob can make the performance more
lively and dynamic, as the tube-driven tone reacts to the volume. When I do this, I like
sandwiching -the Space Heater with compressors on both ends, so I have finer control of the
tube-distortion effect. On vocals, I can certainly add lots of hair at 35 or 70 V, but for the most
part, Im happy adding very subtle texture and sparkle with low Drive settings at 140 V. In all
of these instances, the 500 modules sweepable HPF and LPF come in very handy.
GH: Speaking of the Drive and Level controls, these knobs are full range, and theyre
difficult to recall. Therefore, if youre using the Space Heater as a summing box, printing test
tones for each channel might be the only way to match settings at a later time. I found the
Drive controls in particular to be very sensitive, with small adjustments resulting in large
changes. This could be due to variations in tube performance, the specific pots, or both. Once
you find the setting you like, it is easy to move the control a few degrees too far and end
up in a different sonic location.
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
AH: I agree that the Drive knob can be jumpy. In its first quarter turn, it seems to cover a
huge range, from zero to a heck of a lot. But I do like the fact that both knobs offer full range,
especially when using the Space Heater as a tracking effect. My vintage API 312 and BAE 312A
preamps [Tape Op #45] have input gain controls but lack output level. I almost always have to
put some device (like a compressor or EQ) immediately after them so I can be creative with
my gain structure. A Space Heater channel, especially the 500 version, is a great tool for
managing post-preamp levels, as well as for adding character to the signal. For example, I like
to track drums hot through API-style preamps, so that transients clip and saturate; the
resulting sound is usually punchy and huge. If I take the output of the preamp and then
immediately feed a Space Heater channel, I can use the Heat and Drive controls to add tube
clipping as I explained earlier sometimes a lot, sometimes a little bit, and sometimes none.
Then the Level knob allows me to manage the signal before its fed to another device, basically
using the knob as an output fader. Meanwhile, the HPF allows me to take out some of the
unneeded thump that might otherwise cause a downstream compressor to overreact or a
converter to clip prematurely. On the rackmount Space Heater, the post-tube Level control is
active even when the tube stage is bypassed, so I can still control the channels output level,
and concurrently, the amount of transformer saturation, with tube drive off.
I also love the Space Heater 500 for mixing, especially for parallel processing when its
mounted in my Radial Engineering Workhorse rack and mixer [Tape Op #85]. Using the Space
Heater 500s sweepable filters, Im able to focus what triggers the distortion (with the filters set
pre-tube) or focus the distorted output itself (filters set post-tube), and then add that distortion
back to the undistorted signal. This affords me very fine control over what portion of the signal
I want to distort, while still allowing the full spectrum of the signal to come through. Plus, the
immediacy of turning real knobs makes this setup a powerful and creative tone-shaping tool.
GH: During my time with the Space Heater, my only regret was that I did not have time to
experiment with different tubes. 12AX7s are affordable and can be found in a variety of color
flavors. (But dont try similar-looking 12AT7 or 12AU7 tubes. They operate at different voltages
and could damage the unit.)
AH: Speaking of color, if youre curious about how the Space Heater colors your signal, heres
what I learned from taking some measurements:
Frequency and phase response of the rackmount version, channel input to channel output, with
just the transformer stage active, is ruler flat from 20 Hz to 20 kHz. In fact, its only down by 0.2 dB
at 12 Hz and 48 kHz. With the tube stage active, the frequency-response graph follows a shallow
dropoff in the highs: 1 dB at 11 kHz, 2.5 dB at 20 kHz, and 6.5 dB at 40 kHz. The summing bus
(with tubes and transformers bypassed) is down by 0.5 dB at 20 Hz and 0.1 dB at 48 kHz.
The tube stage adds primarily whole-spectrum, second-order harmonic distortion as Drive is
turned up, as well as other even-orders (to a lesser degree, as expected). But once you hit a
certain point (say in the last 10% turn of the Drive knob with a high-level input), the post-tube
buffer can distort, and third-order harmonic distortion swamps the signal, adding a harsh
buzz good or bad, depending on what youre trying to distort.
As the Level is turned up, the transformer stage saturates, and third-order harmonic distortion
dominates, with the knee of the graph starting at 1 kHz and then sloping up significantly at
lower frequencies. The second and fourth-order harmonics start about one octave below at 400 Hz,
also climbing as the frequency goes down. I would characterize the resulting sound as lowfrequency resonance, versus the full-spectrum buzziness of the overloading post-tube buffer. This
resonance can add a rich bloom to heavier sounds, as well as density to mixes and stems.
The Space Heater 500 performed similarly with both of its stages active. I wasnt able to
measure its transformer stage separately (since theres no bypass facility for just the tube stage),
but with the Drive set very low, I could see that the smaller Jensen transformer generates thirdorder harmonics starting at roughly an octave lower than the bigger Eclipse, and it exhibits much
more odd-order harmonic distortion at lower frequencies. At 15 Hz, transformer resonance leads
to more distortion than fundamental.
Although I didnt measure signal-to-noise ratio, I will say that self-noise has yet to be a
problem when using either of the Space Heater models, even at extreme settings (like Drive
turned way down and Level turned far up or vice-versa).
Now that Ive bored you with these specs, let me end my portion of the review by saying that
I love what I can do with my Space Heater 500 modules, and I think the multichannel Space
Heater is a very cost-effective way to obtain eight channels of real tube and transformer
distortion for both track and stem processing. Plus, like all of Radial Engineerings products,
both models have great secondary features sweepable filters on the module, summing bus
and headphone output on the rackmount that add real value, truly making them multi-use
boxes. What does Garrett think?
GH: They sound good, are built like a tank, and are backed by a respected manufacturer.
(Rackmount $1699.99 street, 500 module $699.99; www.radialeng.com)
AH & Garrett Haines <www.treelady.com>
Meris
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
Meris may not yet be a household name in pro audio, but its team of three have put in
plenty of time developing products and designs for companies like Strymon and Line 6, and
working creatively for companies like Disney and Sony Pictures. Currently, Meris produces a line
of 500-series modules, which include the 440 [Tape Op #103], a versatile mic preamp with
integral pedal effects loop; the Ottobit [#109], a bit-crushing, tone-mangling processor; and
the Mercury7, a vintage-inspired, DSP-based reverb processor. I spent some time with a pair
of Mercury7 reverbs in my API Lunchbox and discovered both conventional and otherworldly
applications for its reverbs.
The Mercury7 takes advantage of the Meris teams analog and digital design strengths and
employs high-quality AD/DA conversion and DSP processing, along with high-end analog
circuitry, to create unique and captivating reverb and ambience effects. The Mercury7 sports a
cheerfully blue, easy-to-maneuver front panel with an array of six knobs and three buttons.
Each of the knobs can adjust primary as well as secondary functions, allowing the user deep,
but intuitive, parameter control from a concise set of knobs.
In my studio projects, I rely heavily on plug-in reverbs for acoustic spaces, ambiences,
and sometimes far-out textures, but not one of my plug-in reverbs really sounds as rich
and organic as a Lexicon 480L or a Bricasti Design M7 [Tape Op #69], let alone an EMT
250 or AMS RMX 16. Think about this: Dedicated hardware reverbs take advantage of
purpose-built processors and circuits to execute one very complex reverb algorithm,
while plug-ins are limited to their meager share of your PCs overall CPU resources. Plugins have their place, but cant really compete with complex algorithms optimized to run
on dedicated, real-time chips. With that in mind, the Mercury7 utilizes a full DSP chip
for each channel of reverb. These mono modules may be individually controlled or
control-linked for stereo or surround use.
Setting up the Mercury7 begins with choosing one of two basic algorithms. Ultraplate
provides a typical dense plate, while Cathedra provides more ethereal, textured atmospheres.
Both algorithms may be modified with parameters such as decay time, high and lowfrequency
absorption, pre-delay, wet/dry mix, and a few not so standard parameters, like Modulate, Mod
Speed, Pitch Vector, Vibrato, and Swell.
Starting with Ultraplate, I easily dialed in a fat plate setting for some live horns in a very
busy pop/R&B mix. The Mercury7 imparted a dense ambience to the horns that was familiar
and kind of retro, but also blended well in a modern production and provided a nice sense of
front-to-back space. I used two Mercury7 modules linked with the supplied cable for stereo
control, so that any changes in the left channels controls are automatically mapped to the
right channel. Then, by slightly offsetting the right channel parameters from the left, I could
quickly and easily create a dramatic stereo reverb sound-field that would be quite difficult to
achieve without delving deep into the pages of the typical reverb units parameters. Although
not as natural or traditional sounding as, say, a Bricasti, the Mercury7 definitely holds its own
against high-end hardware reverb units.
The Cathedra algorithm provides a seemingly limitless playground of sound design
options, inspired by the shimmering, pitch-shifting ambiences used in the 1980s Vangelis
soundtracks for Blade Runner and Chariots of Fire. The reverb times can stretch for many
seconds, and the modulation and swell controls transform acoustic guitar or percussion
tracks into synthetic beds of pitch-shifting layers of sound. The Cathedra algorithm is a
sound designers dream synth, and the knobs can be played in real-time to create musical
and emotional orchestrations.
The Mercury7 proclaims to be the first algorithmic reverb in the 500-series format, and
it certainly breaks new ground as both a versatile, traditional plate reverb and also as a
sound-bending, ambience-generating hardware instrument. The wet/dry settings and zerolatency analog mixing prove useful when using the Mercury7 as an insert effect. Conversely,
setting up the reverb as a traditional aux send/return device works well in mix situations.
Moreover, if you have two Mercury7 modules, instead of just using them in stereo-control
mode, try patching the output of one unit into the input of the other unit to achieve even
more creative sounds.
On the Meris website is a video of DSP Engineer Angelo Mazzocco introducing some of
the sounds and capabilities of the Mercury7. Its nicely done and well worth watching.
While youre there, you can read about Angelos past accomplishments as a designer of
several now-iconic guitar-reverb effects, as well as the past experiences of Terry Burton and
Jinna Kim, all three of whom make up the Meris team. Meris proudly manufactures all of
its products in Los Angeles.
($549 street; www.meris.us)
Adam Kagan <www.mixer.ninja>
Edwards Audio
Research
LE-10 Mono & Stereo
tube preamps
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
Peter Guralnick
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
tied to the display have RGB LEDs which align to the color of
the parameter or instrument displayed, so you always know
what you are selecting at a glance. Additionally, the 64 pads
are also RGB-based and offer the same dynamic color feedback.
Even with the default color-coding in the Live interface, its
incredibly useful and reassuring to have all of that color
feedback below your fingertips.
As I type this on my computers keyboard, a clear analogy
emerges for me. I cannot imagine using Live without the
Push 2 the two have become that closely tied together in
my Ableton workflow. So, Push 2 + Live to me is as
functionally joined as my keyboard is to this computer. Push,
especially now with this incredibly mature and evolved
version 2 hardware, is a fundamental interface.
Ive been gigging with, and occasionally producing, a cool
Afro-Cuban/Brazilianinfluenced funk and soul band called The
Tender Cinders, and my role in the band is largely to be the
weirdo keyboard and beats guy kind of like the Dr. Fink to
their Revolution, if youll forgive the analogy. (RIP, Prince.)
With this gig, I challenged myself to put Push and Live 9.5
front and center in my setup. To that end, I got a study stand
and case (Push owners, check out the Pelican 1495 attachstyle hard case!), then built a stage rig that rapidly evolved
over the course of two months of testing. Although I use a few
analog synths patched into Live via a USB interface, the
majority of the sounds generated for this groups stage
performance was coming from Live. And the set itself was
entirely managed and performed on the Push, because part of
my self-challenge was to never touch the computer during a
performance. (The machine used for testing was a fairly new
Retina MacBook Pro running macOS 10.11.)
I have to say, despite a few early hiccups traced back to
a faulty USB cable, this rig performed flawlessly. Ultimately,
I was running five virtual instrument tracks (a combination
of Arturia VSTs, customized Max for Live [Tape Op #76]
instrument racks, and a variety of other plug-ins for
processing), as well as two input tracks for my analog synths,
three stem-bus tracks with dynamics processing, three stereo
effects sends, blah, blah, blah. It was a fair amount of stuff
that was deliberately kept modest in scale so as to encourage
actual performance with Push as the instrument almost no
clip triggering. The best thing about the Push 2 in this regard
is that (beyond my initial offline set construction), I never
look at the computer while on stage, and yet never feel
disconnected from my music-making gear and software. Nor
do I feel lost the color coordination, UX, and icon-rich
display all keep things moving fast and flow-worthy.
New to Push 2 and Live 9.5 is a redesigned sampling
workflow. It manages to feel both brand-new and somehow
comfortably familiar, especially if youre familiar with slicing up
samples on an Akai MPC. Dragging a sound file (pre-edited
sample, or really any audio file) to an empty MIDI track via the
browser (or, you can record a sound source via an input channel
in Live), calls up the freshly overhauled Simpler instrument
as if Live just knew that you were wanting to sample that file.
Simpler, by the way, is Lives default go-to plug-in for easy
sampling just drag a sample into its Drop zone, set sample
playback and looping boundaries as necessary, and start
playing. This simple workflow allows you to work with your
sample in one of three modes: Classic (basic looped sample,
useful for melodic instrument creation), 1-Shot (monophonic,
spread out over the entire grid as pitches), or Slice (optimized
for drums and breaks). Each mode serves up a detailed, zoomable, live-scrolling waveform to the TFT display, with all of the
parameters for sound design and refinement right there via the
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
Ableton
hl
ia
sa
rm
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
CME
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
encoders. Its fast, fun, and (in keeping with most things
Ableton) cleanly designed.
Push 2s new, full-color, hi-res TFT display is beautiful,
and the mixing workflows it supports are stellar. Its a huge
step up from the dot-matrix LCD of the original Push, and
its capable of conveying information to a far clearer
depth. At any given point during a set or a sound-design
session, you can use it to gauge levels or adjust sends,
returns, solos, mutes, fades, etc. True, you could (rather,
can) do the same with the first-generation Push, but the
visual feedback presented on the new, bright and clear,
color display is indispensable.
Other changes to hardware are just as significant. Each
encoder is still touch-sensitive, but the tactile feedback
seems more refined, and the control layout has been tweaked
in thoughtful ways for improved ergonomics and ease of use.
One huge improvement tied to both the encoders and the
display is the new browser on Push you now have wellorganized and clear access to all of your sets, sounds, and
yes, third-party plug-ins and sample libraries too. Browsing,
instantiating, and controlling instruments and effects is
mostly an intuitive and logical sequence of actions, but I did
find that navigation through deeply-nested racks can get a
shade perplexing at times, at least until I got accustomed to
the new browsing paradigms. Understanding the relationship
between the upper and lower rows of color-coded displayselection buttons is key. Fortunately, the simple color cues
and consistent layout are, again, logical and helpful; and
colors correspond to tracks. A word about shortcuts there
are definitely many hidden gems involving the Shift and
Select buttons on Push as modifiers to other functions, so
occasional deep dives into the manual will perpetually reveal
new shortcuts available directly on the hardware.
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
Profile
hl
ia
sa
rm
www.retroinstruments.com
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
Note that the larger Xkey37 model, in addition to its Micro-USB port,
includes a proprietary Xport connector and a breakout cable, with 5-pin
DIN for MIDI output and two 1/4 cables for sustain and expression. CME
also makes 25 and 37key wireless Xkey Air Bluetooth versions. I did not
test these, but latency is claimed to be only a tad higher than the wired
versions. I should also note that Xkey not only works with macOS and
iOS apps, but Windows and Android are also supported. (Xkey Air requires
a WIDI BUD accessory for Windows and Android.) XKey Plus is a
configuration app that is available for macOS, iOS, and Windows. It can
change a whole bunch of internal settings, even allowing the velocity
curve to be redrawn, and it updates the firmware as needed.
The only downside to Xkey is that it lacks wheels for pitch-bend
and modulation, instead relying on switches for these functions.
Depending on the patch youre playing, and how the patch and Xkey
are set up, these buttons can work fine, but you just dont have the
same expressiveness that you do with a dedicated wheel or lever. But,
this feels like a very minor quibble for a keyboard that fits into any
backpack and is USB bus powered.
If all my talk about Xkeys compactness has you thinking it might be
kind of flimsy, youd be wrong. This keyboard feels very solid and wellbuilt, much more so than a lot of competitors products. My only slight
concern is for the long-term reliability of the Micro-USB sockets, but
those are an industry standard outside of Apple-land, and a necessary
evil in small form-factors. The upside is that no wall wart is needed!
Overall, Ive gotta give kudos to CME for rethinking the portable
MIDI controller and coming up with the best music keyboard for iOS
that Ive used to date. My other iOS-compatible keyboard is sadly
destined for eBay. Minor issues with the pitch-bend and modulation
switches aside, I dont think youll find a better keyboard for the iPad.
Moreover, the ease of accurately playing the low-profile keys makes
Xkey a serious contender for your main MIDI keyboard controller too!
(Xkey $99.99 street, Xkey37 $199.99; www.cme-pro.com) JB
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Margo Price
Chris Staples Golden Age
Midwest Farmers Daughter The home studio can be a confusion of what ifs for many musicians. Should I try this virtual
string program? Maybe Ill layer tons of instruments to build this chorus up. Can I do 100
vocal takes? The options can seem endless in this digital age, and at times can become
pointless when the music doesnt hold up to some bedroom-style, kitchen sink production. But
records like Chris Staples Golden Age, made at home in a very simple manner, transcend any
recording scenario with great songs, performances, and arrangements. Instruments include a
nice variety, with acoustic and electric guitars, bass, piano, drums, strings, and keys. The
album is melancholy, yet positive, and feels like it looks forward to the future. As Chris has
stated, Its really easy to idealize an earlier time in your life, but its not useful. It can be a
trap that keeps you from finding new good things to live for. Golden Age is about that myth
we carry around. The myth of our past being idyllic. I dont want to waste any more time
dwelling on it. The album was written and recorded by Chris from November 2015 to February
2016 in Seattle, Washington, at his home setup known as Hot Tub Studios. During recording,
It rained nearly the entire time, he observes in the liner notes.
gr
I have a garage that Ive turned into a personal studio. Its a cave-like place with no windows,
so its easy to lose track of time in there. Its not totally soundproof, so sometimes
environmental sounds can creep into the recordings. Ive recorded in so many alternative
spaces over the years that Ive come to embrace the random bird chip, someone doing
dishes, or a car going by. In mediums like film, the environmental sounds are crucial. I like
to think of song recording the same way. I have a good selection of acoustic instruments,
percussion, and an electric bass setup. I track most things myself, but occasionally Ill have
a friend over to play some parts. My friend, Stephen Baldock, is a great bass player; he came
over and did some stand-up and electric bass on this new record.
ho
o.
I have been using a pair of Shure KSM137s on acoustic guitars lately. I mostly use a Shure
KSM32 on vocals. I love this mic and Ive been using it for years. It has pretty smooth highend for a cheaper mic. Sometimes I record vocals and acoustic at the same time using
the KSM32. It takes a little time to get the vocals and guitar balanced, but what you wind
up with is a nice performance with no phase issues. I did most of the vocals and acoustics
together this way on my previous album, American Soft. I tend to use as few mics as
possible these days. I just got an Audio-Technica AT8004 dynamic, omnidirectional mic. It
has a low output, so when you crank it, it adds a little bit of noise, which I dont mind.
For vocals, with the low rolled off a bit, it has a really nice image that doesnt sound like
any mic Ive ever owned.
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
@y
a
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
Yes, absolutely. I make records in the rainy season, and I cancel my Netflix
subscription during this time.
<www.chrisstaplesmusic.com> <www.barsuk.com> -LC
856-589-6186 609-636-1789
WWW.ENAKMIC.COM ENAKMIC@COMCAST.NET
(7) Heres an open suggestion to Apple: Release a Pro version of macOS that caters to the people who helped
build the Apple brand before you made iPhones, and go back to allowing users some control over the OS, such as
deleting apps and choosing when, and if, they want to upgrade. According to Andy Hong: Windows 10 also forces
OS updates on you unless you have Windows 10 Professional. But thats the beauty of Windows there is a Pro
version, and you can set it up exactly how youd like. The built-in admin tools for the Pro version provide every bit
of tweaking that you could ever imagine, including how and when you want to receive updates (or not). And there
@y
a
gr
ho
o.
It pains me to write this, as I loved my old Macs. Apple has done some amazing industrial
design work, and made computers easy for people to use. At its peak, the Mac was brilliantly
easy to use, versatile, and able to adapt to different needs and workflows. Without Apple, I
probably would not have learned the graphic design skills I have. Mac was the computer for
creative professionals for many years. I feel like thats in the past now. Macs are clearly not
machines for professionals any longer, and are likely to become even less professional in the
coming years(7), which is why I hope to be Apple-free in two years time.(8)
When I wrote the Hammer editorial a few years ago, I briefly mentioned RADAR (from iZ
Technology) and how I was attracted to it for its focused simplicity. Since then, RADARs
capabilities have expanded, and you can now run most major DAWs on it, albeit in a Windows
environment. I ended up buying a RADAR Studio system, and I am currently running Pro Tools
on it. It is much, much faster than my Mac Pro and Mac Mini, and much more stable. Also, iZs
tech support is world class. In a word, the system is professional. Ive had to learn the Windows
environment, which was a bit intimidating at first, but I have to say, its not that difficult. Its
been far less frustrating to deal with my Windows move than my recent Mac issues. Our resident
Gear Geek, Andy Hong, has been singing the praises of PC-based DAWs for years now. Well Andy,
Im listening. You can put together a very fast and stable Windows recording setup for much
less money than a Mac system. With turnkey rigs like RADAR and Sweetwaters Creation Stations,
you have a customized platform for music recording thats still an off-the-shelf solution with
great tech support. Im sure Windows has issues too, but from what I can tell, you can choose
an earlier OS version, its easier to customize the OS, and you have more control over the
upgrade process. After multiple software installations in the past few months on both macOS
and Windows, I can attest that installations are much easier on Windows than on macOS.
Consider this a call to action for audio professionals and software developers. Lets
collectively support the alternatives to Mac by considering Windows, Linux, or other platforms.
Its the only way well be able to set up recording systems that work the way we want them to.
Most major DAWs will run on Windows, with the exception of Apple Logic (which has become
much less professional anyway(9)). My RADAR is running Pro Tools 12.4 and Ableton Live, with
plug-ins and virtual instruments from all major vendors, including UAD, Eventide, Soundtoys,
Sonnox, Valhalla, PSP, Audio Ease, and Arturia.
Bye bye, Apple. I really will miss you.
JB
rm
ia
sa
hl
Rainbow Electronics
5800 Madison Avenue, Ste. G
Sacramento, CA 95841
916-334-7277
www.rainbowelectronics.net
are several reputable online communities of actual IT professionals (not just genius iPhone jockeys) offering truly
useful guidance and advice.
(8) Except for my iPad. I love the iPad as a stable platfrom (despite the frustrating forced updates) for
consumption (Netflix, web browsing, etc.), and I love some of the software instruments (soft synths, drum machines)
for the iPad as well. I think computers need to be divided into two categories moving forward: computers for making
things (professionals), and computers for consuming content (consumers).
(9) Before you get mad at me for this statement, I think Logic is a great compositional tool, albeit one that
pushes users towards presets; but it is not as good as Ableton Live. I do have to give credit to Apple for making
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
The Panoramic House is the ultimate VRBO for musicians. A live-in residential studio in West Marin, CA
overlooking the Pacific Ocean with API & Neve consoles, 2 tape, Pro Tools HD, and an echo chamber.
Each room of the house is filled with musical instruments except for the gourmet kitchen with a Wolf range.
Plenty of room and solitude to get into a creative space but only 30 minutes from San Francisco.
Rates start at $350 a day.
www.vrbo.com/505782 john@onefinmanagement.com 916-444-5241
Please Support Our Advertisers/Tape Op#115/97
My most recent
(and hopefully last) Apple computer purchase was a
brand new Mac Mini, which I bought to have as a
backup machine in case our main Mac Pro tower
developed problems.(4) Out of the box, this machine
was running macOS 10.11 El Capitan. After I
installed new versions of the two DAWs we support,
a text message from my wife appeared on the Macs
screen, reminding me to pick up some avocados at
the market. This was after I had entered the
minimum amount of personal information possible
during the setup process, since this was a work machine that lots
of people coming through my studio would be using. I wanted my personal
info to be inaccessible, and for the system to be as stripped down as possible.
Id already deleted all the messaging, mail, photo, and social-networking apps
from the dock. After getting the text message, I figured Id better delete the
apps entirely. But upon trying to so, I got the message stating that the
application cant be modified or deleted because its required by OS X. What?
Why cant I delete an app I dont need or want? I called Apple, and they
confirmed you cannot delete the apps. (5)
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
by John Baccigaluppi
gr
ho
o.
hl
(1) I actually still have that OS 9 machine, and I boot it up every few months, as it has a few
font and design apps that never made it to OS X.
(2) Keep in mind that most recording sessions start around noon and go to midnight or later,
and most studios work weekends. Tech support lines (if you even have a support option and can
reach a human being) tend to be open 9 to 5, weekdays only.
(3) I think that software environments have become so complex and intertwined that, no
matter how much beta testing is done, its impossible for any software company to ensure that
its new upgrade will work perfectly with your other existing software and hardware
components. I recently heard of a situation at a tech startup where two identical Mac laptops
were reacting differently to a piece of software, despite having the exact same hardware, OS,
and software installed.
After this experience, and having several engineers I respect note that El
Capitan sucks for audio and that macOS 10.9 is the most stable for music, I
decided to take my Mac Mini into my third-party Apple repair shop, have them
delete El Capitan, install 10.9, and start over. But it turns out this an
impossibility, as the Mac Minis current firmware will not work with earlier
macOS versions, ensuring that you cannot make the choice of which OS youd
like to run.(6) I guess macOS is designed for one way of doing things: the way
that Apple wants you to. Get used to it, or get off their platform.
(4) My main studio is pretty remote and isolated; I need an immediate backup if something
goes wrong.
(5) I realize I needed to create a separate user-account, and did end up doing this, but my
preference would be to delete the apps I dont need and not have the computer automatically tap
into my phone and contacts.
(6) If youre reading this and wondering what you can do if you want to run an earlier version
of OS X on a Mac Mini, you should consider finding an older quad-core Mac Mini, and verify that it
will run the OS you need. The newer Mac Mini models do not have a quad-core option.
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Extra Bonus
Articles:
ho
o.
gr
Bradley Studios
& The Nashville Sound
Bob Ferbrache
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
Denvers Denizen
Bonus
No.
Sept/Oct
115
2016
Behind
The
Gear
This Issues Masters of Mics
@y
a
ho
o.
Selling direct?
rm
hl
ia
sa
gr
RC: Thirty days. If you dont like it, send it back. Just
make sure its not banged up or dented.
CB: Over the last eight years weve only had one ECM47 returned, and only a few ECM-87s.
ho
o.
gr
CB: Everybody wanted it, so we went through the same What kind of ideas went into the
making of that?
process with our ECM-84 kit.
RC: We wanted to offer it with omni and cardioid RC: We wanted very low handling noise, better
feedback rejection, and a clearer sound. Those were
patterns, so we spent a lot of time designing the
the three big challenges.
capsule housing as well as the electronics.
CB: People wanted a small diaphragm condenser, and CB: I really like it because it is transformer-less. Im
sure you know about people advising to take your
we take peoples advice. Theres the MP-1073
SM57s and gut those. We figure if it sounds better,
preamp. That was the next thing everybody wanted,
its the way to go.
because every mic needs a preamp.
You put something up, and change it if
RC: The handheld mic is as good, or better, than
you dont like it.
Did you do a transistor-based design?
anything out there. It feels nice; a heavy, solid, and
CB: Yeah, the biggest mistake people make in home CB: Yes. And it has the largest transformer we could fit
beautiful mic.
recordings is they start recording before they listen.
in there! It has a huge, thick, creamy sound. Its
incredible. At the moment there is a 70-day waiting What new products are on the way?
What have been the reactions of your
RC: Were coming out with a killer drum mic kit, and we
list for the MP-1073!
pro colleagues that have received a
have a 251/C12 style mic coming out.
$150 mic?
One channel?
RC: There are classic microphones that have been CB: One channel. Its a desktop unit because the CB: Thats a really amazing mic, and we will be offering
it at an incredible price. Great sound, at a great
around for years. Theyre pleasing, well-designed,
transformer we put in was so huge that it would
price. Thats been our goal from the day we started
great microphones. My biggest clients have those
need to be a two-space rack. We plan to offer a twoGauge Precision Instruments. r
microphones, and they tend to use them. I dont
channel version of the MP-1073 in early 2017.
think either one of us would say, Get rid of your RC: We offered the MP-1073 in advance and it sold out <gauge-usa.com>
$15,000 mic and go for one of ours. Thats not the
idea. But clients of ours that have those classic mics
use ours also, because its a different sound. Its a
different color that can be used in a different
application. Thats a valuable thing; to be able to
have a selection of microphones and choices. But I
think most of our Gauge clients are singers,
songwriters, and young producers. They want a good
microphone, at an affordable price. They want it to
sound good, and they want it to be reliable.
ia
sa
rm
RC: Yes, and its not like were getting rich on selling
microphones. That was never the idea. Chandler is
finishing his doctorate degree, and Im mixing and
producing every day. We still work together, but
Gauge Microphones is really a way for us to give
back, and we enjoy doing it.
@y
a
hl
LUKE GILFEATHER
Studio Manager
How long have you been working
here?
Ive been here just over a year.
ho
o.
rm
@y
a
buildings around Music Row. He owns this one, RCA I think it was kind of a concurrent development between
the Bradley brothers and the RCA studios across the
Studio B, and the Masterfonics building. Hes letting
street. They were trying to compete with rockabilly
Belmont use this one for, I think, the next 50 years.
and rock n roll music. They had a bunch of country
What about the gear thats used here? Is
artists signed to these labels, who were selling in the
any of it from way back when?
thousands. Roy Orbison and The Everly Brothers were
Not here, unfortunately. All the stuff is more modern. Theres
selling close to a million copies. Owen and Harold
nothing from that era. There kinda is, but it came from
Bradley and Chet Atkins across the way started
Bradleys Barn [Studio] and the RCA complex. The Mike
thinking of ways to attract a broader audience. What
Curb Family Foundation bought a collection of microphones
they ended up doing was taking the fiddles and the
from the Bradley family, and they are all classic.
steel guitars and downplaying them. They started
Like 50s and 60s microphones?
using things like grand piano, which had never been
Yep. Theres a pair of Telefunken 251s and four Neumann
used on country records, and background singers and
M 49s. Ten RCA 77s and three RCA 44s came from the
lush string arrangements. I think it was a formula to
RCA studios but are here now. Thats the only thing that
survive, and it really worked like a charm. What made
really comes close to the era. We really dont have
it come about was this need to survive, and also this
anything from the Columbia Studios era. Supposedly,
handful of players working together in all of these
the fuzz tone was invented in the Quonset Hut. They
studios called the Nashville A-Team. They had this
were using a tube console, and Glenn Snoddy who was
formula down in this sound and in this groove.
an engineer here in the early days noticed that a grid
in the console had fused together, and somebody was Was the system set about like it is now,
where there three three-hour
playing a guitar through that channel. The guitar player
blocks?
wanted to fix it, but the producer told them to wait, and
ran the solo through it. Glenn Snoddy reverse Yes, but unlike today the expectation was that they
would have three or four songs done in one of those
engineered it, and found out what happened. He ended
session blocks. These guys were laying down these
up developing [what became] the [Maestro FZ-1] Fuzztunes that were essentially the first or second takes,
Tone pedal, and sold them the license. It was on the
then moving on to the next song. Part of what made
Marty Robbins tune, Dont Worry.
hl
ia
sa
gr
echo chambers above this control room. And then How do you feel Nashville has changed
there are two plates up in the [Studio A] machine
through the years?
room that is connected to a central patch. We run Technology changed. We did the first direct-to-disc
both studios side-by-side, and halfway through the
albums here to eliminate tape hiss. Digital came in,
semester they switch studios.
and we also did the first digital recordings in
Do they understand where theyre
Nashville. I remember saying that the cymbals
standing?
sounded like glass. It changed the sound. They have
Some of them appreciate it. I try to tell them. To some
better digital machines now, but back then you
it doesnt mean that much, but others will try to seek
couldnt get the sounds you wanted out of digital
it out and record whenever they can.
machines. Now you go through noise gates,
harmonizers, Auto-Tune, and click tracks. I dont use
KENNY MALONE
click tracks; I never will. The band has to feel the
Drummer
time, and you have to play your time according to the
lyrics. When youre playing with a click track, and you
hit it right on that bick, you spend your time
chasing where the next bick is gonna be. Youre not
listening or paying attention to any music. Its like
painting by numbers.
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
NORBERT PUTNAM
Producer & Bassist
hl
gr
ho
o.
transition?
When did you decide to stay in
Nashville?
Well, I came to [Columbia Studios] one time to play bass
About 63 or 64. We had a lot of clients coming down
through Felton Jarvis, Elvis producer. We had been
getting $5 an hour from Rick. One day Felton brought
an arranger with him, by the name of Ray Stevens,
and they told us wed be making $20 an hour in
Nashville. Felton and Ray both said they would have
work for us if we came to Nashville, so before we got
here we knew we could make a living. The interesting
thing was we were hardly ever hired together [as the
Muscle Shoals Rhythm Section]. Owen Bradley would
use me, and Chet Atkins loved Carrigan. Fred Foster
from Monument would use three of us.
ia
sa
@y
a
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
hl
ia
sa
rm
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl
Bob Ferbrache
Denvers Denizen
interview and photo by Larry Crane
Bob [McDonald]?
Yeah.
won the crowd over, despite the capes and the knee-high
because I had friends that worked at
gold
boots.
They
could
play.
I
think
that
everybody
in
the
Systematic Distribution before that.
I know you were in The Healers with Jello
audience recognized, These guys can rip!
Joe Pope [Systematics owner, member of Angst]. Hes one
[Biafra, Dead Kennedys] way back.
of my best friends.
I was in The Healers. Not concurrently with Jello, but Jello So you continued to play in bands in the
area, but what led you to recording?
I havent seen him for decades. I think the
was my friend. He was with The Healers, and a newfound
last time I saw him was at a party at
punk rock god, but the guy who co-wrote California 4-track cassette, when that popped up. I got my first 4Systematic in like 85 or something. And
track in 81, a Studiomaster, so I had a 6-channel mixer
ber Alles, John Greenway, hes The Healers.
Jello was there.
on it, where you could patch any of the channels.
Hes the main focus of that?
Well, they were friends too.
Yeah. I was a friend of his too, and Jello goes, Get him out Is that the rack mount one?
Yeah,
its
a
rack
one.
Where
they from out here?
of his basement! He wont get out of his basement.
My
friend
bought
one
of
those
at
the
same
Yeah,
Boulder.
Oh, like playing shows and stuff?
Yeah. I did, and he writes brilliant stuff; rock operas. We did
instrumentals mostly.
time. He was obsessed, and he was a coke I forgot all about that. This is dredging up my
dealer or something, so he had some
past too. When did you move into sessions
extra money.
where you went to an outside studio?
Yeah, Boulder.
ho
o.
gr
I was probably living here at that time. I remember My bands at the time. Ive actually got a whole stack of CDs
and stuff for you. Heres a CD of a band that I was in
practicing around town with them too. They had a B&O
during the 80s that was recorded on 4-track cassette.
turntable, a giant Crown amp, and two big Klipsch PA
Where were you working out of?
Were you officially like a producer or
speakers. Id play albums as loud as possible.
something at that point? What would
People were saying that you were doing a That 4-track cassette was recorded in that room in there.
ia
sa
Tommy Bolin recordings, and stuff like that. Then as time went
on, I was a photographer and I hung out with people. Id
always collect board tapes from sound guys and get board
tapes that Id listen to. I was really obsessed. I was really
into live recordings quality live recordings. Especially when
artists in that time did things that werent so calculated, or
timed to click tracks or whatever, like they do now.
@y
a
So no one
rm
Careful?
Yeah.
Do you feel like thats carried over into I always felt like that was so dangerous. I Youve moved to other places too, but youre
was doing a lot of that too.
seen regionally as someone whos been in
other fields, into helping people to
and helped a lot of these bands progress.
Well, I could always go back. I had the original, so the only
make records?
hl
thing that would be a problem was the drum mix that I Yeah, Ive done restoration, engineering, mastering, producing,
Were talking about the 70s. 70s records are amazing, like
initially did in stereo from like five or six mics.
and mixing. I just mixed an album for some guy in Canada.
Queen and The Beatles, anything that sounded like that.
The tracks were recorded well, so I mixed this whole album.
I love garage bands and stuff, especially some 60s ones, What kind of mics were you amassing at
that time?
You said you feel like you have this
and all the big hits that youve heard in the past that are
opposition with the corporate world. Was
garage bands, I loved that too. But I was into prog music. Shures.
it
something that just sort of randomly
Did
you
start
working
with
other
people
So, Gentle Giant, and The Strawbs, or folk prog more, too.
happened that way?
once they heard the results of your 4I was into European folk, and I loved the ways those
track stuff?
and the singer had a child that needed dental work really bad,
and we were barely getting by. So my suggestion was, This
is a multinational corporation, and they have interests in
bomb factories in South Africa. Lets get health insurance,
and pay for unemployment insurance, and make sure. So we
came and met, and we sat down, and they were like, Okay,
what do you want to do? We said, Lets talk about
producers. They said, Well get T Bone Burnett [Tape Op
#67]. I go, Well, I know Steve Fisk [Tape Op #3]. They say,
Oh, no, well get somebody bigger than Steve Fisk. I go, I
know him, and hes a great producer. No, well get you Dan
Lanois [Tape Op #37]. So thats where it went. Then it came
down to healthcare, and they were like, What? They flipped
on that, the same way the rednecks at the Tea Party flipped
on it. We were like, Its just a suggestion. And that was my
suggestion. I wasnt the one who was like, T Bone Burnett?
Really? Youre just going to call him up and get him in the
studio to produce us, just like that?
They made a second record, and they had an option for a third
album. The whole shit hit the fan when A&M got bought up.
The head of A&M, Al [Cafaro], used to drive a Porsche and
wear black karate outfits. He was a huge fan of the band,
because he actually saw them play live. He always let the
A&R guys do the work. Hed never listen to bands. So if his
A&R guy said youre great, hed trust them. But he actually
went and saw the CD release show for the first album, and
the band blew him away. Theyre a fantastic live band. They
had an option for a third album, and that got picked up,
despite the fact that they owed A&M over a million dollars.
They had an option that they were to be paid $50,000 if
they werent able to do their third album. So then their
contract got sold, but he picked up the option before he got
fired. So he signed off on the option, he got fired, Universal,
or whoever, took the label over, looked at the contract,
dismissed the $2 million or whatever they owed them, and
gave them the $50,000, because of that option. So then we
had $50,000, and they came to me, and they recorded their
best record [Secret South]. And its their best-selling record.
Yeah, exactly!
ho
o.
gr
Maybe its my indecision with the corporate world in general, Youre using Soundscape [DAW]. Thats far
and thats just a little harsher than the music world, with
more well known in Europe for
what theyre judging, especially with what theyre putting
recording stuff.
out now. Thats the only benefit for guys like you and I Yeah, its SSL now.
them putting out such crap.
What drew you to that?
The worse the mainstream is
Id moved to Seattle, and then I came back here, and I was
A guy like M. Ward can really rise among these ashes to
just here for a few months, and I moved to Cairo. My friend
become a prominent artist.
said, Nothing costs anything; we can live like kings, so I
Its true. Remember how the 80s were?
went there for a year, and yeah, I didnt do anything. When
There was a lot of crap on the surface, but
I came back to Denver, that was the beginning of this
then there was a lot of amazing stuff in
studio as it is. The day I came back, I went and saw 16
the early 80s that there was just no
Horsepower play. It was shocking how original and good
chance in hell of getting on the radio.
they were. I actually sort of knew those guys, and I went
But it was good music.
and said, Man, this is the best thing Ive ever heard. They
Yeah, a lot of good music!
said, We need a keyboard player. Do you want to play in
Describe the evolution of your space and the
the band? I was going, Okay, well, Ill play some bits. So
house here.
I was in 16 Horsepower the day I got back from Cairo. Then
Well, the 4-track, and then the next thing that came along was
we started doing some stuff.
that I had to go to the next realm outside of that. That was Had they recorded at that point?
to get out of going to 8- and 16-track studios. I wanted to Yeah, they had a demo. Ill tell you the story. They had an 8 track
do that here, so I went into 8-track. Tascam made a great
cassette, and a live cassette, which is fantastic. Later I rething. When I saw the unit, I said Im getting it. It was a
mastered all of that stuff, and its an album called Olden now.
built-in, 1/4-inch, 8-track with dbx.
We made a demo tape with the band and me on a 24-track
The 388?
at a big pro studio that just seemed to make demo tapes or
The 388? Is that what its called?
something. Mercury Records was jumping on it, and I had
The 388, with a little mixer.
done this thing where I had committed to a tour to go to
Yeah. So I bought it, and I got a couple more mics and a
Europe with this band, before I was in 16 Horsepower. I had
couple compressors.
all these people, Karl Blake, and these brothers who played
At the time, what kinds of studios were
percussion. It was kind of like a Crash Worship style of band,
open?
but we were set up to go on a four-month tour of Europe. I
8-track and 16-track studios with, I was almost going to say
went on that tour, and I kept checking in to see whats going
Trident boards, but I think that might have been excessive.
on. Oh, Mercurys really interested. I came back up and got
I cant even tell you what kind of board. Now, it wouldnt
back in the band again. We hooked up with Morphine. They
be the same, because you can buy a Trident for $1,000 now.
saw us play. We played our first shows with Morphine.
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
But that was what it seemed like. This was pre-Mackie. When We got really friendly with Morphine. Then the Mercury thing
Mackie first put out their mixers, to me, that changed
didnt happen, and then this guy I knew who worked at
everything. To be able to get a desk like that...
Slash Records came and visited here. He went, Oh, Im
Yeah. I had the 32x8.
really interested in your band. I had the demo tape when
Yeah, the 32x8. Thats what I got.
I came back they had mixed the new demo tape, and it was
No polarity buttons! The worst thing in the
awful. I re-EQd it and ran it through a BBE and did all sorts
world. How long did you work with the
of crap to do something to it. Later I found out that they
Mackie?
made it sound really bad on purpose, because if the label
I had that one here for a couple years. I went to 16-track. The
was interested in them, theyd see through that. The
8-track ended abruptly, and I sold everything for a girl. I
drummer told me that they had this idea that if it were too
moved to Seattle in 90 and 91, and particularly two or three
polished, the label wouldnt be interested.
albums I had recorded on that 8-track, they were playing the [laughs] I dont know if that always works!
fuck out of them on the radio in Seattle. Im sitting here Yeah. But I made this tape, and I played it for him, and he said,
working in a kitchen! I was an outsider, so the only job I
This tape hit my desk six months ago and I threw it in the
could get was as a prep cook in a kitchen. I jammed with a
trash can. This is fucking amazing! He goes home the next
couple people, and that was sort of fun, but nothing. So like
day, and an A&R guy from A&M calls me up and says,
the Human Head Transplant stuff that I did, the Boyd Rice
When are you playing next? I tell him that were playing
album that I did, I did Crash Worship here on 8-track
tomorrow, and he says, Well, what about after that? A few
Was that done here?
days later, A&M flew out and saw us, and bam were on the
Yeah, that was done here on 8-track, and they were playing it
label. Just like that. And then Im out of the band.
there on the radio every time I got into the car. The Boyd What year was that?
Rice album came out while I was living there, and they That would have been 94.
played it every hour for three months.
Why were you out of the band?
Crash Worship was really big for a while. Corporate. When the band got together the day before we flew
What gear do you have now?
out to see A&M they were like, Lets get our interests in
Thats a further evolution. I have a laptop, and Ive been
order. What do we want from this label? Okay, we want to
experimenting with that. I got the PreSonus. I tried to find
get an equipment budget. We want the recording budget. We
16-channels of input for the Mac, and I wanted it to be small.
want to find producers. Everybody was barely working on
minimum wage with their other job, if they had another job,
110/Tape Op#115/Mr. Ferbrache/
The guy who did the Nick Cave albums at the time [Paul
Corkett]. Then they got it mastered. So they got to spend
$30,000 on the album. I think their best album is the next
one [Folklore], which the label said, You owe us a record,
On occasion, but maybe less now. There are less people out
there. Everybodys got a PreSonus interface, a Mac,
GarageBand, and a [Shure SM]58, and youre a studio.
Well, thats when the studio started. This realm of the studio
started when Michael [Moynihan], who does Blood Axis, was
a friend of mine. Id done that Boyd Rice & Friends album
[Music, Martinis and Misanthropy], and Id done some Boyd
Rice albums in the past few years. After I wasnt in 16
Horsepower anymore, he finally goes, Okay, well its time we
made up. Wed dabbled together, I mean wed played music
together before, and I didnt have anything, and he goes, I
can get an advance from two or three different labels in
Europe. Ill get the advance and give you the equipment, and
then we can just start recording. So thats what it was. In
94, he got a couple thousand dollars, and I got a Mackie 32,
a Tascam 16-track reel-to-reel
Yeah, there are a couple of places where Ill think about doing
drum tracks. But the last drum tracks that I recorded here MSR-16?
were the best drum tracks that Ive ever made.
Yeah. And we recorded that album, The Gospel of Inhumanity.
That was written here. He had a couple Arabic instruments Have you ever done them upstairs? Does it
Thats where the name of the studio came from, Absinthe.
that were given to him, and he had licks. Okay, lets make
get a little loud outside?
We were drinking a lot of absinthe, and we wrote a song
a lick, and get a click track. Okay, I like this measure. I like The neighbors are completely copacetic with me.
called Absinthe.
these four parts. I like this part. Construct a song, verses Thats convenient.
Its kind of a notorious record. How was that
and choruses, and then re-do it to the verse and chorus. I Yeah. I recorded this metal album for Kingdom of Magic, and I
created? Were you guys just bouncing
had 48-tracks up, and were sitting there going, Id really
couldnt have the bass player in my house. He had a Mesa
ideas around?
like that chorus to come here instead of there.
Boogie and an Ampeg stack, a thousand watts! Its part of Yeah. We had a couple song ideas, but a lot of its
his sound. We literally had to go to an airplane hangar to
In that sort of scenario, youre more of a
soundscape stuff. We made samples and collaged stuff. I
record it. I took my Mac, and I set up four mics on the bass
collaborator than an engineer and
did most of the music.
cabinets and just let him have at it. The bass sound is Was your mom living at the house at the time?
producer in helping the process along.
awesome! I actually had to use dynamic mics on the distant Yeah.
But dont you feel a huge amount of that
mics, because I took my Crowley and Tripps, but I wasnt even Was she ever like, Whats going on down
is based on the trust that you guys have?
going to take them out of the box in that room.
Yeah. I only work on a half-dozen records a year at most,
there?
because I take a couple months to record a record, or a Blow em up?
No. She loved it. One time when we were doing the Blood Axis
year! I record records simultaneously, and Ill spend a year Yeah, or get dirt in them.
album, its five in the morning, and theres two bottles of
on them, when people arent on tour.
Where do you see things going for you, like
unopened wine. I go, Hey Michael, watch this. I can juggle!
more of the same?
Is it kind of a nice situation to be in here?
And I cant juggle. I threw both bottles up in the air, and they
I assume that equipments paid for, Well, I dont know. Im probably a bit confused on that. Ive
crashed and broke and fell all over. I was like, Oh shit! So
the house is your house, theres no
been doing stuff just to sort of make ends meet. I devote
I got a Shop-Vac and started vacuuming everything up, and
extra overhead
myself to these projects. One thing that I do is that lots of
my Mom came in and was like, What are you doing?
people who do their own demo recordings or make their Wait that might be enough. But the
Yeah, and theres no worry about time, other than the labels.
records in other studios and stuff offer people cut-rate
Yeah, someone might be waiting for it! Say
music and the noise and stuff?
mastering. I could do something thats worthy of their Yeah, only on a couple of occasions did she ever comment. She
youre working on a Woven Hand record,
project really well, and do it for a couple hundred bucks.
and you guys are in here. When do you
liked most of the noise. She loves David and Slim. Michael
Then you just spend one afternoon on something.
say its done?
and Annabel [Lee], who are Blood Axis, are her best friends.
He knows. When hes doing stuff, he knows. With the Slim Yeah. Do some of the tricks come from the
They were here when she had her stroke.
Cessnas Auto Club records, I do those, and they dont really
restoration work as well and stuff?
One of the things that we constantly see is
even come here. If I send them a demo or a mix, they tell Yeah. I do stuff with this guy, Bobby Beausoleil. I just did a
that sustaining longevity in this
me if its wrong, but thats about it. I have total freedom.
restoration on all the tapes that he recorded, about 20
business is difficult, and when you can
I throw Theremins on stuff, and backward guitar solos,
tapes. He sent me all the reels and I transferred them. I
come up with scenarios when youre not
backward masking whatever!
rented reel-to-reel players, transferred them all digitally,
in a desperate financial position, it
and restored them. There have been a few records done.
These are a lot of people that youve had
helps to keep a sort of stability.
Weve got about four or five out. The Lucifer Rising box set, I have many, many a time when I was here with my mom
connections with for a long time, too. I
I dont know if youve seen that.
guess everyone kind of knows how their
in particular, Id always tell her, Oh, this is temporary. Im
roles interact at that point.
Ive heard of it. Weve had someone who was
gonna move out, and Ill keep an eye on you. I never did,
going to interview Bobby a while back.
Especially with the Auto Club. I mean, Im in the band, and Ive
but I thought I was going to get a space, because Id
been touring with them for two years, off and on again. He would be an amazing interview. To start off with, the stuff
looked at spaces. But then it was like, You know that
Weve just had our twentieth anniversary this year! So yeah,
he did in the 80s.
Mr. Ferbrache/(continued on page 112)/Tape Op#115/111
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
ho
o.
gr
record by that band that I didnt want you ever to listen No. Our interests are 60s French girl pop groups and things Their albums are fantastic, but the one I worked on didnt
to? I couldnt even think of the idea that Id have to
like that, or television. If I talk to him on the phone its
sound any good. They recorded it on ADATs with a rented
listen to them 3,000 times, over and over again.
like, Did you see that episode of Mission Impossible last
mic and then brought it to me. Then we re-tracked the
night? Yeah, hes really into things like that.
vocals and I tried to mix it. Its okay. Some people love it.
Like doing something just to pay the rent?
I think its really good, but its not like their other records.
Yeah. Ive done it before. Im have some projects coming up Wheres he living these days?
where Im doing that too.
He lives in downtown Denver.
I feel like we kind of organically go
What kind of restoration work have you I saw a NON performance a long time ago.
been doing?
It was pretty fun, but his persona is
like
I went to thousands of concerts in my day, and I even worked
gr
for concert promoters. I worked at this venue, Ebbets Field, It supersedes him. They made that four-hour movie and it Its actually a disease. Microphones are a disease. When I
where I took photographs and stuff, and I saw bands like
still didnt defer his persona at all! And his book, he just
look at a magazine, it raises my blood pressure. Its just,
Lynyrd Skynyrd, the first time they left Kingsville, you
put a book out, NO; its really good. Its just his
Oh, I want this! I want a [Neumann M] 149 tube mic
know? I saw Leonard Cohen, in a 250-seat club. I have a
thoughts. Just to perpetuate his myth even further.
for my house!
whole bunch of CDs Ive done [Live From Ebbets Field] of Theres a bit of myth about you, too. To What kind of stuff have you purchased
restoration stuff, and those are from that club that I was
people in town youre just this
lately microphone-wise?
just telling you about. Thats from 73 to 76, and theres
legendary guy, or youre Big Bad Bob or Well, the last thing I got was some cheap mics. I got those
Robin Trower, Peter Frampton, Gene Clark
something. Do you think thats part of
Cascade Fat Heads out of your magazine for next to
the success of things?
nothing. Okay! Ive been using them! I love ribbon
Were these all shows you taped?
mics. I always get mics in pairs, so I have a pair of
I helped tape some of it. The tapes came around. Like the Oh, probably. Yeah.
Royers. Ive got an interesting mic. I had $4,000, and I
Peter Frampton thing on this, for some reason sometime in Theres something that seems a little
wanted to buy a microphone. I decided that I wanted
the 80s, they got copied onto DAT, and they werent done
larger than life.
something different. Im not sure if this was the right
well. Whoever did the copy actually put reverb on them!
I dont know, I always thought that it was just because,
choice or not, but I got one of these InnerTUBE mics
like I said, I only make two or three albums a year or
Oh, come on.
[MM-2000 MAG MIC]. Yeah.
something. Then if its a local thing, that album sort of
80s reverb! So the Peter Frampton one on this, that was
transcends it. Its done on a level thats more than a What do you think of the sound of that?
found online. It was like the Peter Frampton thing was a
demo tape-sounding album. Thats the problem with I like it. Its sort of bright. Its really powerful.
cassette that I had thats great. Peter Frampton heard it,
everything that comes out of Denver they sound like It looks crazy! Thats an actual Maglite?
and he flipped out over it. The guy who arranged to put
demo tapes to me.
them out did it all for charity. Thats how they could get
Yeah, it uses actual Maglites. So I could sit there and tell
everybody to agree to it. Theres like 2,500 copies of each Like not finished, so to speak?
the vocalist, Okay, yeah, so this mic serves two
made. Ive got Muddy Waters and Howlin Wolf sets, and I Yeah. Theres a really lo-fi ethic coming out here, like this
functions. Its an excellent vocal mic, and if Im not
better restore them for their archives.
getting the best vocal take, I can just whip the Maglite
band Tennis and other people have kind of broken out.
part and beat you over the head with it!
How are you mixing here these days?
What did you think when The Apples in
Stereo [Tape Op #2] and The Minders Yeah, or if we get lost on the way out. You
I do analog mixes, because I use an SPL summing mixer.
ho
o.
hl
ia
sa
rm
@y
a
gr
ho
o.
@y
a
rm
ia
sa
hl