Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Los Angeles
by
Nikolai Barov
1998
The dissertation of Nikolai Barov is approved.
____________________________________
David B. Cline
____________________________________
Claudio Pellegrini
____________________________________
Eli Yablonovitch
____________________________________
1998
ii
This dissertation is dedicated to my parents.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures.......................................................................................................... vi
Vita.......................................................................................................................... xi
Abstract.................................................................................................................... xii
3.3 Matching............................................................................................... 54
5.1 Introduction........................................................................................... 71
iv
5.3 Diagnostics............................................................................................ 84
5.3.4 Pepper-pot............................................................................... 89
5.5 Creation of a witness beam in the same cavity as the drive beam......... 104
127
v
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2. The drive and trailing beams in an underdense plasma, showing only the
first oscillation.[F-PWFA cartoon]............................................................................ 7
Figure 4. The longitudinal wake and initial bunch profile for a 20 nC beam in a
3 ×1013 plasma.......................................................................................................... 25
Figure 5. The beam longitudinal phase space after interaction with the plasma...... 26
Figure 10. Evolution of the pinch point as a function of S , the propagation distance
in units of the betatron wavelength......................................................................... 45
Figure 12. Normalized beam spot area for a number of different emittances........ 51
Figure 13 Normalized beam spot area for a number of different plasma densities 52
vi
Figure 16. Matching of the beam body with a ramp of length 1.63 cm
(k r = .964 cm − 1 ), corresponding to = /2 ........................................................ 61
Figure 17. Matching of the beam body with a ramp of length 3.33 cm
(k r = 0.472 cm −1 ), corresponding to = .......................................................... 62
Figure 20. The AWA drive and witness beamlines (simplified view)................... 73
Figure 23. Radial cross-section and electric field pattern of -mode 2 12 cell gun. 77
Figure 30. Projected image from one row of beamlets and (smoothed) background
sampled between the rows....................................................................................... 96
Figure 31. The grid used for analyzing the emittance data..................................... 98
vii
Figure 33. Longitudinal phase space of a drive and witness beam created by delaying
emission by 40 psec.................................................................................................. 106
Figure 34. Streak camera projected image of drive and witness beam.................... 107
Figure 35. The modified plasma source, shown without beam diagnostics............. 112
Figure 37. Cerenkov streak image showing nb ( x,t) , with earlier times (beam head) on
top............................................................................................................................ 122
Figure 38. Transverse beam profile after collimation, from digitized CCD camera
image of Cerenkov light........................................................................................... 123
Figure 39. Transmission data and simulations for an initially nearly -matched
case.......................................................................................................................... 124
Figure 40. Time-slice dependence of beam intensity and half-widths, form experiment
(exp.) and PIC simulation (sim.)............................................................................. 125
Figure 42. The spectrometer system, including the slit at the plasma anode,
quadrupole, bend magnet, ICT and phosphor screen................................................ 130
Figure 45. A simulated view of the spectrometer screen showing a y -focus for high
energy particles........................................................................................................ 133
Figure 46. Images of the energy spectrom taken at spectrometer focal plane. Image c)
is a no-plasma background....................................................................................... 136
Figure 47. Spectrometer phosphor image with the gray scale adjusted to accentuate
viii
the high energy tail................................................................................................... 137
Figure 48. The laser splitter used to control the delay between the drive and witness
beams....................................................................................................................... 142
ix
Acknowledgments
There are many people who helped make this experiment a success. First and
with the plans which ultimately lead to the Argonne experiment. Along the way, he has
When initially starting out in the accelerator field, I received a lot of help from a
fellow graduate student, Gil Travish. I greatly enjoyed woking with him during the early
about photoinjectors to Eric Colby. It has been a great experiemce to work with him.
I am greatful for the generosity of Jim Simpson, and later Wei Gai, who were
very accomodating with the scheduling accelerator time for the plasma experiment, and
with resources needed along the way. Wei has provided much coaching in the practical
I am also thankful to the other members of the Argonne group that have helped
with the experiment, including Manoel Conde, John Power, George Cox, Richard
Konecny, and Paul Schoessow. From UCLA, Alex Murokh’s assistance with the
x
VITA
xi
ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION
by
Nikolai Barov
The blowout regime is a limiting case of a nonlinearly excited plasma wave that
overcomes problems identified in past linear regime studies of the plasma wake-field
accelerator. Here, it is studied with the aid of simulations and by conducting experiments.
Fluid model and particle-in-cell simulations have been used to study the propagation of
drive pulses short enough to couple to the plasma mode, over distances comparable to the
energy depletion length. Evolution of the beam radial dynamics in the simulations, and
the associated wake-field phase shifts, outline phenomena important for achieving the
maximum energy gain for the accelerated electrons. An experiment to demonstrate long-term
drive beam propagation of a short electron pulse in an underdense plasma shows good
agreement with simulations, with minor differences thought to originate from the limitation
acceleration is part of an ongoing effort, and has shown a 2.6 MeV energy gain and a 22
xii
Chapter 1. Introduction to Plasma Wake-field Acceleration
refined state after some fifty years of development. These devices are limited in peak
acceleration gradient due to material damage thresholds and ability to trap dark current,
both effects improving at higher frequencies. The acceleration gradient sets the overall
size of a linear collider, dominating the construction cost of the facility, while power
losses determine the operating expenses. While the use of higher operating frequencies
may yield a higher gradient, the variety of proposals for the next generation of linear
collider, spanning a range from 1.3 to 30 GHz, suggests that the advantages of this
approach are still unclear. The energy scale of interest for these machines is in the 0.5 to
2 TeV range, where electroweak symmetry breaking occurs. Additionally, as the history
always accompanied by new and unexpected discoveries. However, the cost of each of
these colliders is high enough to make funding by a single nation uncertain. This may
force a large international collaboration as the only setting in which to build such a
machine. In light of this conflict between future generation linear collider requirements
and the capabilities of the conventional technology, it has been argued that the field needs
an entirely new technology on which to base future machines. Research into advanced
and exotic particle acceleration techniques was begun with the goal of inventing just such
a technology.
include laser, electron beam, and microwave-driven schemes based on plasmas, dielectrics,
metallic structures, and far-field (or vacuum) acceleration, such as reflecting a laser close
to an intense focus, and the inverse FEL (IFEL) accelerator. Already, some promising
1
applications emerging from this field have been in the area of electron sources, with a
transmission line-based pulsed system reported in [1] and a very promising plasma-based,
see acceleration methods now termed exotic emerge as compact sources of 10-20 MeV
electrons for research, medical or industrial applications. Although the acceleration gradient
for some schemes is many orders of magnitude higher than the ~20 MeV/m conventional
linacs are operated in, the record having been set at 100 GeV/m with the laser-wake-field
reliability, power efficiency and repetition rate translate to a much longer development
cycle for the new technology, perhaps on the scale of 20 years or more. The plasma
wake-field accelerator discussed in the rest of this Thesis, because it relies on a source of
high energy electrons for the driver, is probably limited only to collider applications. The
research into these devices usually proceeds in several stages, with 1st generation experiments
establishing proof of principle, 2nd generation demonstrating high gradient, and 3rd generation
concerned with beam injection and emittance preservation. The current state of development
of the plasma wake-field accelerator (PWFA) discussed in this Thesis, places it somewhere
around the 2nd generation mark, leaving many questions in terms of its ultimate suitability
in such an application unanswered. Although some of these areas are in desperate need of
accelerators. With the help of a plasma, the very high peak powers at the focus of a high
2
power laser could drive longitudinal electric fields having the correct phase velocity for
particle acceleration. Examples of this are the plasma beat wave accelerator (PBWA),
and the laser wake-field accelerator (LWFA) proposed by Tajima and Dawson[3]. A
figure of merit for the electric field a plasma can sustain is given by the wavebreaking
limit, E0 = 4 n0 mec 2 , which is the roughly the field from a 100% sinusoidal modulation
the peak electric field for trapping of plasma electrons, seen as a steepening and eventual
breaking of the wave in the longitudinal phase space. This field scales as the square root
of the plasma density, with 0.96 and 30 GeV/m for a 1014 and 1017 cm−3 plasma,
respectively. Fields of this magnitude can be achieved without the usual concerns about
material damage thresholds, because the plasma medium can be restored for each new
shot.
The concept of wake-field acceleration (as in LWFA) was borrowed from a parallel
line of research, that of trying to harness the energy a bunched beam loses in passage
through a microwave cavity. These losses are usually undesirable in a linac application,
and much effort is spent in trying to minimize them. When a significant amount of power
from one beam (the drive beam) can be coupled into the cavity’s fundamental mode, it
can result in acceleration for a second beam (the trailing beam) appropriately delayed in
time. In search of better transformer ratios, the ratio between the peak accelerating and
peak decelerating field, this idea has ultimately been replaced by the two-beam accelerator
(TBA) where the power is coupled to an off-axis resonant structure, such as the dielectric
step-up transformer being developed at the AWA[4], and the metallic-based CLIC
accelerator [5].
An electron bunch will also drive a wake-field response in a plasma - the idea
behind the plasma wake-field accelerator. Originally, the PWFA was construed in the
3
linear regime, where the plasma electron density perturbation is small. Chen et al.[6]
considered wake fields from a point-like electron beam, or the limiting case of a small
radius drive beam: r << k p−1 . The quantity k p−1 = 4 re n0 is called the collisionless skin
depth (re and n0 are the classical electron radius and unperturbed plasma density,
velocity v ph = c . Later work generalized the theory to include finite in radius and length
bunches [7], leading to consideration of disk-like drive bunches ( r << k p−1 )[8]. Where the
plasma electron motion for pointlike bunches is mostly radial, it becomes mostly longitudinal
in the opposite, disk-like bunch limit. In both cases, the wake field Ez is proportional to a
convolution integral over the drive beam current I( ) over the longitudinal coordinate
which is also of same form for the time-averaged wake-fields in microwave cavities and
dielectrics. For symmetric in time bunches, a theorem (the Wake-Field Theorem) limits
the transformer ratio to no higher than 2.0. Pursuit of higher transformer ratios in both the
linear regime and for the nonlinear plasma dynamics considered later in this chapter
usually takes the form of using triangular bunches, with a slow ramp-up in the current
et al. [9] with a 0.4 nC pulse train generating a 0.25 MeV/m acceleration gradient in a
n0 = 1011 cm −3 plasma. Bunch train excitation of a wake field, as is intuitive from the
form of Eqn. 1.1, is most efficient when the bunches are spaced apart by one plasma
period p . The single drive bunch experiment by Rosenzweig et al. [10] saw a 1.6
MeV/m wake-field, ultimately driving the plasma outside of the linear regime [11].
4
Experiments were also carried out in Japan by Nakajima et al. [12], demonstrating a 30
MeV/m acceleration gradient, and Nakanishi et al. [13], using bunches from two identical
linacs for the drive and trailing beams. At the time of this writing, several experiments
aimed at achieving higher gradients and a better understanding of the PWFA mechanism
are planned around the world. One proposal uses the 46 GeV beam of the Stanford Linear
collider to drive wake-fields in a 0.2 −1× 1015 cm−3 plasma[14], with the aim of measuring
sections, as shown in Figure 1, the trailing beam receiving an energy gain as it passes
through each one. A plasma accelerator is inherently a high frequency, short wavelength
device,which makes it harder to synchronize the phase fronts in the individual acceleration
sections. Current technology for drive beam creation translate to a plasma density centered
5
Figure 1. A trailing beam accelerated in a series of plasma sections.
regime, the “blow-out” regime, in which the drive beam is focused well enough ( r << k p−1 )
and dense enough that the plasma electrons are blown out of a region encompassing the
drive beam radius, and an ion channel is formed in the plasma, as in Fig 2. For beams that
are not too short, this tends to happen very close to the beam density needed to make the
plasma underdense (nb > n0 ), so that one can talk about an underdense PWFA and the
by almost a factor of 2 in some simulations. This is not surprising, since this limit comes
the overdense regime, the plasma response generates strong focusing forces which affect
the drive and trailing beams. For the underdense case, this focusing is of a type much
better suited to so-called 3nd generation PWFA experiments, where preservation of the
6
Figure 2. The drive and trailing beams in an underdense plasma, showing only the first
oscillation.
Figure 3. A configuration space plot of plasma electron positions from a particle in cell
(PIC) simulation. Parameters are the same as in the Chapter 2 example, except for using
twice as much drive beam charge, 40 nC.
7
Although the plasma electron dynamics are very nonlinear, the blow-out regime
presents the trailing beam with wake-fields that have a greater amount of linearity. This
behavior can easily be illustrated with the expression for the radial force acting on the
4 e2 r
Fr = ∫ r(n (1− z,e ) − ni )dr , (1.2)
r 0 e
where ne and ni are the plasma electron and ion densities, and c z,e is the average
plasma electron longitudinal velocity. This formula is only exact for an ultrarelativistic
rigid beam so that the solution is a function of only the longitudinal position within the
bunch, = z − ct , and has no explicit time dependence. For an ion channel, this force can
be very strongly focusing; this is called ion channel focusing [30][20][21]. Integrating
this equation up to the channel radius rchan yields the focusing gradient in this regime,
which has the desired linear form. This linearity is not guaranteed in the overdense
regime because variations in ne and z ,e within the trailing beam volume will add a
time-dependence to the focusing force as well as sextupole and higher order terms,
adversely affecting the emittance. One further consequence of linearity becomes apparent
on applying the Panofsky Wenzel theorem [22] governing the longitudinal and radial
forces,
Fr Fz
= . (1.4)
r
Unlike the linear regime which has a changing with focusing gradient, this dependence
is not present in the blowout regime, hence an acceleration gradient independent of the
radius. Again, this is not guaranteed in the linear regime, with particles at larger betatron
8
orbits gaining less energy.
For the blowout regime, the only remaining variation of the wake-field in the
Ion channel focusing is very strong because it is a first-order effect, unlike alternate-
gradient quadrupole focusing. It is this property that plays an important role in maintaining
the drive beam density in both underdense and overdense schemes. In attempting to
the beam envelope will not have any betatron oscillations is given by eq = (Fr r) mc 2 ,
or,
For n0 = 1014 cm −3 and = 40 , the -function is 4.7 mm, so a matched beam size will
increase by a factor of 2 over such a length in the absence of focusing. This matching
condition will only be true for the later parts of the beam, where the channel is fully
formed, leaving beam particles closer to the leading edge with less of a focusing force.
This leads to a dynamic process of radial spreading or erosion near the beam head, a topic
discussed in Chapter 3, which deals more generally with underdense regime propagation
of short, symmetric pulses. The conclusion of this work is that effective beam propagation
will happen only when the beam density exceeds the background plasma density by a
factor in the region of nb n0 = 2-4, assuming the beam radius to be given by the matching
condition of Eqn. 1.5. This topic is felt to be quite important for effective, as well as
predictable, plasma wake-field creation, and is picked up again in the experimental part
of the Thesis. Chapter 6 presents the results of an experiment devised to test this model
9
Ion Motion
For the conditions achievable in the experiments discussed in the later chapters,
the plasma ion motion is small enough to be of negligible effect. For this reason, ion
motion is neglected for most of the remainder of this work. However, one can easily
envision cases where ion motion is large enough to significantly modify the plasma and
beam dynamics. Since the force on the ions is toward the axis, the tendency will be
toward increased ion density, along with a nonlinear radial profile, with the same
consequences for the focusing force as when the electrons remain within the channel. The
equation governing the ion motion, (analogous to Eqn. 3.5 to be covered in Chapter 3),
r ′′ + k2 r = 0 , has,
2 e 2nb
k2 = (1.6)
mi c2
While the emittance of the drive beam can always be artificially inflated to keep its
density from being too large, these dynamics have perhaps the most serious consequences
for a high energy trailing beam, whose matched density can easily exceed 1 ×1018 cm −3
for 1 TeV and 1 nC. For hydrogen ions, this can easily lead to density perturbations of
order unity within the trailing beam volume, an obviously unacceptable situation. In this
case, ion density at the back of the bunch will be given by,
ni ,0
ni ≅ (1.7)
m N r n 1/2
z
cos2 8re e b e o
mi 2 n
10
set by electron source dynamics: if less particles per bunch are used it is usually desirable
to make use of the smaller available emittance. The ion density perturbation can also be
Beam Loading
this regime it’s possible to extract nearly 100% of the wave energy, but at the expense of
an equally large energy spread in the trailing beam, or no accelerating force for the very
last particles. To minimize the energy spread with smaller amounts of beam loading, they
suggest using a reverse-triangular trailing beam, with a diminishing intensity toward the
back. This paper also examines the emittance dilution due to off-axis variations in the
loaded wake, prescribing use of a wide drive beam and narrow witness beam as the best
way to overcome these limitations. This really amounts to calculating the effect of the
For the blowout regime, the radial effects are nonexistent, and only the longitudinal
wake profile is of interest. For a Gaussian in time beam, this self-wake will be a nonlinear
A short, constant intensity beam will have a self-wake much closer to being linear; the
beam charge can further be adjusted for this to cancel the slope in the plasma wave.
Although a more careful study of these effects ought to be done for the underdense case,
11
3-D effects and scattering
While the discussion has until now been limited to cylindrically symmetric systems,
treating the full 3-D system exposes a richer set of effects. Because 3-D capable computer
simulations have a greater associated operating costs and complexity, these phenomena
can couple power not only into the fundamental mode but also into deflection modes,
typically leading to unstable beam propagation. For an overdense plasma, this comes in
the form of the two-stream instability, which is partially slowed because the nonlinear
focusing acts to decohere a transverse impulse on the beam. In the underdense case the
phenomenon is called the electron hose instability [24], with the unstable behavior being
absolute, or growing exponentially at a fixed position in the beam. The implications for
a plasma accelerator were studied by Krall and Joyce [25], simulating a long (~ 3 p )
beam, thus chosen to create a large transformer ratio. They report visible deflections at
the tail of the 20 MeV drive beam after only 5 cm in the plasma, with the tail becoming
completely destroyed in 10 cm. They conclude that the electron hose mechanism rules
It is now interesting to write down an estimate for the amount of hosing for a
short, symmetric beam depositing most of its energy in a long plasma column. Eventual
long plasma. The effective length for the bunch, 2/ p, can be split up into two halves.
The beam head and pinch region can be assumed to be in the two-stream regime, and the
tail in the electron hose regime. To avoid calculating the more complicated two-stream
interaction, a lower limit for the amount of hosing at the tail can be accomplished by
12
assuming the leading half of the beam not to deflect. The deflection amplitude of the
remaining half can be evaluated using the formula from [25] for the number of e -foldings
Ne ,
Ne = (3/2 )3 / 2 ( 1/ )1 / 6 [(ct + ) / ] (− )
1/3 2/3
p / p , (1.8)
For a GeV beam propagating 1.0 meter in a 1 ×1014 plasma, the number of e-foldings is
Ne =5.85, meaning a response which exceeds the linear growth rate due to transverse
beam deconfinement. The limit on the permissible amount of hosing, as will be shown
below, is set by synchrotron losses of the trailing beam, which forces very tight tolerances
technology must incorporate a suppression scheme for this instability. Whittum et al. [24]
suggest several methods which might be of some help. The equations leading to the
instability include two frequencies, the betatron frequency ck and the plasma dipole
0 , with 0 being the more effective method. One suggestion offered in this reference is
to vary the radius of the conducting wall surrounding the plasma, leading to a modified
frequency ′0 = 0 (1+ b 2 /2 R2 ) where b is the channel radius and R is the wall radius.
To be effective, any such detuning must happen on a length scale shorter than the growth
rate of the instability. The topic of electron hose suppression obviously requires further
study and will most likely modify the current set of ideas about how to build such a
plasma based accelerator. It should be noted that the treatment above ignores the role of
the return current, and the fact that the channel radius is increasing close to the beam
head, both of which may have an influence on the actual growth rate, and possibly
diminishing it. Unlike the case of a beam traversing a set of microwave cavities, this
system has a growth rate independent of the charge, due to the change in coupling with a
13
larger channel radius. The stability analysis should also include the detuning effect brought
on by the rapid variation in beam energy as it is deposited into the plasma wave. The
relevant parameter is the fractional energy loss on the betatron length scale, leading to
( z << k p−1 ) drive beam. In fact, a review article by Esarey, Sprangle, Krall and Ting [26]
hints that given short enough pulses, the instability entirely vanishes. The disadvantages
of this approach include a decreased transformer ratio and greater difficulty in creating
Synchrotron losses
When there is a high energy (~TeV) beam accelerated in this system, any transverse
fields will cause it to synchrotron radiate. These fields may be the result of electron-hosing,
a misalignment between the trailing beam and plasma channel, or, to a lesser extent, the
finite radial size of the trailing beam. At high energies, the losses can become very large
as in the result of Montague and Schnell [27] for a 1 TeV beam misaligned by 100
microns for =1 m (1 ×1014 plasma), which suffers a betatron orbit averaged energy loss
of 76 MeV/m (152 MeV/m peak), or about an order of magnitude less than the wave-breaking
field at this density. Misalignments can result from errors in the drive beam’s initial state,
either in position or momentum. Further, a trailing beam which has begun to oscillate in
one plasma section (as in Fig 1) will keep oscillating in the remaining sections even
without further drive beam errors. In this way, the steering errors accumulated throughout
large final error from the point of view of the collider interaction point requirements.
14
The electric and magnetic fields that cause the ∆E = 152 MeV/m deceleration are
comparable to fields that cause beamstrahlung in the process of colliding e+/e- bunches.
At very high energies, one cause for energy spread in collision point dynamics calculations
5 ∆s
N = (1.9)
2 3
where is the fine structure constant, is the bend radius and ∆s is the length of the
orbit in the magnetic field. For the above 1 TeV case, N = 5.7 after passing through a 1
m of plasma, assuming a paraxial ray displaced by 100 microns. The approximate expression
4.3
1/2
≅ ∆E (1.10)
N
E
and has a value of E = 132 MeV, indicating that some electrons lose much more than
the mean because the energy spread is governed by high energy photons which are
relatively few in number. The implication is that, to avoid large energy spread in the
trailing beam, any transverse misalignments would have to be very tightly controlled, to
better than about 6 µm in order to keep the final energy spread below 200 MeV.
A certain amount of synchrotron radiation will also result from an on-axis beam’s
finite transverse size[27], but these effects are much smaller and can usually be neglected.
Surprisingly, the emittance increase through Coulomb scattering can be very small,
even as the trailing beam propagates through as much as 1 kilometer of plasma. The
calculation by Montague and Schnell [27] for a PBWA case closely follows the treatment
15
of J. D. Jackson [29] for the scattering of fast particles by atoms. Scattering calculations
have a logarithmic dependence on the maximum distance over which the Coulomb force
can act. For scattering by atoms, this distance is the atomic radius. In a plasma, the
calculation uses the screening distance, d . The case of an ion channel is slightly different,
since there are no electrons in the channel to perform the screening, and the force from an
ion can still act on a distance scale comparable to the channel radius, rchan . The expression
for the mean square angle (in one plane) after many collisions in a distance dz is:
2e 2 L
2
d
〈 x ′ 〉 = n0
2
ln , (1.11)
dz scatt pc R
where R is the effective radius of the proton and L is the maximum length over which
the Coulomb force can act. The form of this expression masks the quantum mechanical
arguments used in deriving it: for a high energy beam, the minimum scattering angle is
The evolution of the emittance will depend on the amount of angular spread
already present in the beam, and the orientation of the transverse phase ellipse, through
d n d
= 〈 x ′ 2 〉. (1.12)
dz 2 dz scatt
Assuming that the beam is -matched, this equation can be integrated between the initial
( ) ln(r
re 2 ren0
∆ = − R) . (1.13)
′
n f i chan
16
∆ n = 7 × 10 −9 cm , (1.14)
which is several orders of magnitude below the beams now achievable with photoinjector
technology with 1 nC of charge, 0.5 ×10 − 4 cm . However, the physics requirements at the
interaction point of future colliders may dictate even lower emittances. It may also be
desirable to accelerate a beam to even higher energies, where the emittance increase will
Where the above calculation has been performed for Hydrogen, plasmas using a
gas with higher Z can be formed with only partial ionization. In the case of Ar++, the
Coulomb force near the nucleus will be Z times larger than assumed in equation 1.11.
Here, the dominant effect can be approximated by the formula for scattering off neutral
2Ze 2 a
2
d
′ 2 〉 = ni
〈 xscatt ln , (1.15)
dz pc R
where L has been set to a ( ≅ 1.4Z −1/3 h2 / me 2 ), the atomic radius. The same 1 TeV
collider example will then have ∆ n = 2.5 × 10 −6 cm, which may be too large for some
applications. This formula agrees with the result of Buchanan [30], which uses similar
assumptions, but with the refinement that particles scattered at large angles are considered
The equations governing the plasma dynamics allow a simple scaling to transform
useful when evaluating the effect of changing one or several of the parameters of the
17
beam-plasma system. Scaling arguments allow a quick evaluation of the larger parameter
space involved with choosing the configuration of the 2.5 TeV collider in Chapter 4, and
are also helpful to motivate the discussion in Chapter 5 about the operating point for the
For a rigid driver, the solution for the plasma dynamics can be obtained by
solving the equations of motion for the plasma electrons (the ion motion is neglected)
r
r r 1 r r r
pi
t c
( )
= e E (ri ) + vi × B( ri ) , (1.16)
where the subscript i is over all the particles. The solution will also involve the Maxwell
equations which can be rewritten in dimensionless units, following reference [32], with
H′
∇′ × E ′ = − (1.18)
t′
E′
∇′ × H ′ = j ′ + . (1.19)
t′
The solution to these equations will yield the plasma electron density in units of the
initial density n0 , and fields E ′ and B′ in units of the wave-breaking field E0 . When
translating back to the original coordinates, there is a freedom in the choice for n0 , so that
for every solution in the dimensionless variables there exists a family of solutions in the
different density, provided that they correspond to the same fundamental dynamics in the
dimensionless units.
18
A scaling of this type can be used to explore the trade-offs of a plasma accelerator
on different length scales. From the drive beam’s point of view, the interaction in the
primed variables can be kept the same if the beam dimensions are kept the same in units
of k p−1 and the ratio nb / n0 is preserved. The drive beam charge must scale like a density
Q ∝ n0−1 / 2 . (1.20)
Higher plasma densities, therefore require less charge. From the scaling for the fields, the
electric field per unit drive beam charge obeys the following scaling,
Ez / Q ∝ n0 (1.21)
a result which strongly favors higher plasma densities and, therefore, short wavelengths
for the driver. Noting that the inverse square of the bunch length obeys the same scaling,
−2
z ∝ n0 , reducing the bunch length by a factor of two will generate an acceleration field
four times higher. The emittance to charge ratio required to match the beam to the same
n Q = const. (1.22)
Since this ratio is often used as a figure of merit for photoinjector beams, higher plasma
densities do not require unreasonable values for the emittance. This expression should not
be too surprising, given the fact that it can be derived from treating the beam as simply
Discussion
This chapter has discussed much of the physics topics impacting the eventual use
19
of this technology as a particle accelerator. The successful evolution of this idea will have
to operate in a regime that addresses beam hosing, synchrotron losses, emittance growth,
and ion motion. Most of these topics do not play a very large role in the current set of
experiments aimed at showing that blowout-like conditions are achievable with present
technology and can achieve the predicted acceleration gradients. Except for some difficult
Examining the results of these simulations will reveal more of the character of the
20
Chapter 2. Numerical Simulations of PWFA Dynamics
The underdense PWFA has been numerically simulated with a variety of codes.
Rosenzweig, et al.[19] made use of NOVO and ISIS. Katsouleas[31] used MAGIC. Krall
and Joyce[25] studied radial equilibrium and electron-hose using FRIEZR, and a related
3-D code, ELBA. Additional codes capable of treating this problem include ARGUS and
MASK.
The present work initially relied on the fluid code NOVO [32], adding modifications
to allow for different models for the drive beam. However, the fluid equations used to
model the plasma electrons no longer treat these dynamics accurately given the rapid
variations in density and velocity at the channel radius. Despite these inaccuracies, this
code runs much faster than a particle-in-cell (PIC) code and is valuable for quickly
time-dependent solution, where the electron beam encounters a plasma of a finite size, a
NOVO was developed by Breizman and Chebotaev [32], and named after the
University of Novosibirsk. This code treats the plasma electrons as a cold fluid; the ions
are assumed to be stationary. These electrons are described by a velocity and a density
field, defined on a rectangular mesh. The simulation variables in this code are unitless,
arrived at by transforming the physical variables into dimensionless units according to:
21
equation,
r
p r r r 1 r r
+ ( v ⋅∇ ) p = −e E + (v × H) , (2.1)
t c
Vz V
+ Vr z = 1 + 2Vz − Vr 2 [(1+ 2Vz )E z + Vr H + Vr Vz (Er − H)] , (2.3)
t r
N 1
+ (rNVr ) = 0 . (2.4)
t r r
For a rigid, ultrarelativistic driver, all field quantities can be assumed to depend
Ez = NVr (2.6)
r
1
(rH) = (NVr ) + (NVz ) + j b . (2.7)
rr r t r r
The solution progresses from the front of the bunch backwards, as a function of decreasing
, where the discretized equations link the solution at (r, ) and (r, − ∆ ), where ∆ is
22
The original version of the code employed a rigid drive beam, having a Gaussian
space and time profile. For a more sophisticated treatment of the drive beam, the transverse
distribution at each longitudinal slice can be assumed to be in equilibrium with the radial
in the next chapter, but the solution is still time-independent - it does not predict how
quickly this radial equilibrium is established. For solving the initial value problem such
as a Gaussian beam propagating in a finite-length plasma, a third model for the drive
beam has been developed, using a super-particle representation of the drive beam which
violates the assumption of time independence (d/dt = 0 ) used to derive the fluid and field
equations in NOVO. The loss of accuracy due to this will be small if the length scale on
which the beam distribution changes, the beta function , is much longer than k p −1 , as is
usually the case with high-energy beams. To keep numerical noise to a minimum, a large
number of super-particles, about 5000, are used to represent the beam, each having a
form factor to distribute the charge over several neighboring mesh points in r and z . The
particle orbits are then integrated under the influence of the plasma fields, in self-consistent
fashion. There are two options for evaluating the focusing force for a particle with z ≅1,
by using Fr ≅ e(Er − H ), or by using the value of ne (r, ) and equation 1.2. These two
methods ought to give equivalent results, but were seen to differ by up to a few percent
because of inaccuracies accumulated in solving the Maxwell and cold fluid equations.
The second method is used for evaluating the focusing force because it reproduces the
correct ion channel focusing gradient whenever ne = 0 . Because the plasma fields change
slowly, the particle integration can be sub-cycled, or propagated over many time steps
23
The blow-out regime plasma dynamics can now be illustrated with a real example,
using parameters very similar to those found in the AWA experiments. With the PIC
simulations later in the chapter as a reference point, the validity of the fluid model can
then be evaluated for the stated conditions. In this simulation, a 20 nC, n = 200 , z = 1.94
cm long, n0 = 3 ×1013 cm −3 plasma column. The initial rms transverse beam size obeying
the matching condition is x = 208 µm, which makes the plasma underdense by a factor
of nb / n0 = 3.1, where nb is the peak beam density. Figure 4 is a plot of the longitudinal
electric field profile near the end of the plasma column, showing the characteristic saw-tooth
wake-field shape of the underdense regime, with a peak acceleration field of 130 MeV/m.
The field changes sign at =-0.54 cm vs. -0.53 cm for the PIC simulation of Fig. 7, and
thus the two simulations have almost the same period. Cases with higher charge have
been known to exhibit some unphysical period broadeneing due to the violation of the
fluid assumptions at the channel radius. In all cases where blowout occurs, the return
current is concentrated in an narrow region just beyond the channel radius, showing up as
a spike in Vz . The plasma dynamics at the channel radius are too intricate to be faithfully
Figure 5 shows the resulting longitudinal phase space. The tail of this beam
extends far enough back to significantly beam-load the wave. This fact suggests that such
a beam is not the best choice for a driver, with a slightly longer but more sharply cut-off
beam capable of enhanced performance. In fact, the Gaussian tail extends far enough to
overlap with the optimum accelerating phase of the wave, with some particles accelerated
to ~30 MeV.
24
Figure 4. The longitudinal wake and initial bunch profile for a 20 nC beam in a 3 ×1013
plasma, with = 0 corresponding to the bunch center.
25
Figure 5. The beam longitudinal phase space after interaction with the plasma.
26
2.2 Incorporating a solenoidal field in the model.
in the model of Chapter 3, the NOVO equations can be modified to include the additional
1
rH = − NV
rr r r t
Hz
= − NV ,
r
and Vr completely decouple from the TE-like solution, and equations 2.5 through 2.7 do
not have to be modified. The fluid equations are in fact coupled, and become,
Vr
t
V
[
+ Vr r = G (1+ Vz − Vr2 )(Er − H + Fc ) + H + Vr Ez + V Hz
r
] (2.8)
Vz
t
V
[
+ Vr z = G (1+ 2Vz )E z + Vr H + VrVz (Er + Fc − H ) − V Hr
r
] (2.9)
[ ]
V V
+ Vr = G V Ez + Vr V (H − Er − Fc ) − Vr H z − Hr (2.10)
t r
with,
V2
Fc = . (2.11)
r(1− Vz ) 1− Vr + 2Vz
and
The most visible change in plasma dynamics when a solenoidal field is added is a
27
2.3 PIC code
A number of limitations became apparent with using the code NOVO as the
principal simulation tool for this work. Because it is not a time-dependent code, it cannot
estimate the transient effects of the beam's initial entry into the plasma. Also not adequately
radial oscillations in the plasma. Finally, because NOVO is a fluid code, the validity of
the solution requires that the plasma electron density be a smoothly varying function.
This condition is almost always violated when the plasma electrons rush back to the axis,
as a velocity shear in r causes this profile to steepen and the wave to 'break'. The
of the oscillation period. Despite these concerns, NOVO is still fairly accurate for simulating
the focusing of the drive beam. The decision to write a new (as yet unnamed) code came
with the realization that such a code is not as difficult to create as was usually thought,
and some encouragement from Paul Schoessow. The information provided in a class on
help in originally becoming interested in beam simulations, and also containing information
28
Figure 6. The integration contours used in discretizing the Maxwell equations.
For the time-advance of the Maxwell equations, the prescription of Birdsall and
Langdon [33] was followed. A staggered mesh with uniform spacing is created, as in Fig.
6, and the finite difference equations are derived by integrating the Maxwell equations
around the appropriate contours. These difference equations are advanced in time according
to a leapfrog integration scheme, with the ∇× E equation used to advance B from the
k −1/2 th time step to the k +1/2 th time step and the ∇× B used to advance E from the
k th to the k +1th step. With bulk polarization and magnetization effects set to the vacuum
Er (i + 12 , j) c
t
=
∆z
[ ]
B (i + 12 , j − 12 ) − B (i + 12 , j + 12 ) − 4 Jr (i + 12 , j) (2.13)
29
Ez (i, j + 12 ) c 1
t
=
∆z i [ ]
(i + 12 )B (i + 12 , j + 12 ) − (i − 12 )B (i − 12 , j + 12 )
(2.14)
− 4 J r(i, j + 12 )
B (i + 12 , j + 12 ) c
t
= [E (i + 12 , j) − Er (i + 12 , j +1)]
∆z r (2.15)
c
−
∆z z
[E (i +1,j + 12 ) − Ez (i, j + 12 )]
Again, the half-integer spatial indices refer to the field quantity at Dr times the value of
the index. The PIC simulation also consists of a number of super-particles, of order
2 ×105 in most cases. The forces are computed on these particles, which in turn influence
the development of the fields via the jr and jz terms in equations 2.13 and 2.14, again
using leapfrog integration to compute the orbits. The momenta, like the B-field, are
defined on half-integer time steps, and the positions are defined on the integer steps.
The solution is then propagated for one full cycle in the following order:
known).
2) Advance the momenta p from step k −1/2 to k +1/2 using Ek and the
4) advance E from step k to k +1 using the current density j(x) = evk +1 2 (x − 12 ( xk′ + x ′k +1)) ,
with the velocity v k +12 derived from the momentum, and is the Kronecker delta
function.
The particles’ positiona and momenta are advanced using the relativistically
pk +1/2 = pk −1/2 + ∆t ⋅(eEk (r, z) + ev × (Bk−1/2 (r, z) + Bk+1/2 (r,z)) / (2c)) , (2.16)
30
xk +1 = xk + c∆t ( pk +1/2 mc)2 − 1 (2.17)
with,
Where the field on the particles, B(r,z) and E(r,z) are computed by linearly interpolating
fields between the four closest mesh points. The currents are assigned to the mesh
The fields were initialized to zero, while the plasma electrons's initial positions
were assigned using the Hammersley's sequence [34], and distributed evenly in r and z
but given variable weights to create a uniform plasma. Accuracy is improved when the
number of particles loaded per mesh cell is large (~10). Fortunately, the plasma ions do
not have to be included in the model, as long as it can be assumed that they are immobile.
This is because the field equations have only a j source term and not a term.
A few comments ought to be stated about the correctness of this algorithm with
respect to adequately simulating PWFA performance. In the PWFA case, it's only necessary
for the algorithm to be accurate for about one plasma period, which diminishes the
importance of all the possible sources of error. One source of error for this particular
method of solving Maxwell’s equations is the inaccuracy when approaching the Nyquist
wavenumber for the mesh, leading to a dispersion equation for plane waves propagating
in the x -direction,
∆t c∆t k∆x
sin = sin , (2.19)
2 ∆x 2
31
where ∆x and ∆t are the space and time increments. This makes the phase velocity
smaller than the speed of light for these modes when constrained by the Courant condition
in two dimensions, c∆t < ∆x / 2 for ∆x = ∆y . To overcome this, some codes use a
step and advance each mode with the correct phase velocity. The errors which accumulate
due to the dispersive behavior are limited to the higher frequencies. No attempt has been
made to evaluate the effect this has on the overall solution, such as the acceleration
One future improvement planned for this code is to add a correction which maintains
within the volume. There is no such guarantee with the particle integrator and charge
assignment algorithm used, which will result in minute inconsistencies with the continuity
Simulating the same conditions as the NOVO run presented in the last section
yields an electric field profile as shown in Figure 7. This curve is not as smooth as in the
fluid code case due to the presence of high frequency noise. The cumulative effect
washes out, making the final longitudinal phase space, Figure 8, closely resemble that of
the NOVO output. The highest energies obtained with these two simulation methods are
very similar. One difference the PIC results exhibit is the lack of curvature in energy vs.
delay when approaching the highest generated energies. This is a consequence of the
sharper peaks in Ez evident in Fig 7, as opposed to the rounded-off curve in the NOVO
solution of Fig. 4.
32
Fig. 9 is a configuration space snapshot of the plasma electrons in the region of
the drive beam. In this ficure, it is difficult to determine the remaining electron density in
the channel from inspection alone. Recall that the super-particles originating close to the
axis have negligibly smaller weights in comparison to those at larger radii. The highest
acceleration gradient is just ahead of the point where the channel once again collapses.
Figure 7. On-axis and r = 75 µm longitudinal field from PIC simulation. The center of
the bunch is at = 0 .
33
Figure 8. Longitudinal phase space from PIC simulation.
34
0.12
0.1
0.08
r (cm)
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7
z (cm)
35
Chapter 3. Drive Beam Radial Dynamics
A beam initially introduced into a plasma column at the equilibrium radius, will
begin to evolve in such a way as to more closely match the plasma focusing radial
potential well. The weaker focusing near the head of the pulse, where the plasma has had
less time to respond, will allow the beam slices at this position to radially expand. If the
front-most slice expands so much that it’s density is negligible for the purpose of plasma
channel formation, the interaction effectively starts at the second slice—the first slice has
eroded away. This erosion, called emittance driven erosion, can proceed to subsequent
slices until the beam is deconfined, but the asymptotic erosion rate from a 1-D model[36],
( )(rb rc )
2(1 + f )
0 − p = 0.181 f 0.9 , (3.1)
where rb and rc are the beam and plasma channel radii, and f is the ratio of the line
densities of channel ions to beam electrons. This expression means that beam head
mc3 0
Le ≅ . (3.2)
maxeEz
In 2-D particle-in-cell simulations, Krall, Nguyen, and Joyce [36] report a much diminished
erosion rate, almost resembling a near-equilibrium state. They attribute this to the beam’s
forming radial wings, which cannot be accommodated in the 1-D formalism. Such an
inherently 2-D effect can only happen if the focusing potential acting on the beam is
nonlinear, causing the beam’s transverse phase space to filament. Such radially nonlinear
behavior is always present in the transition near the pinch region from a small perturbation
in the plasma electron density to the point where the channel is fully rarefied.
36
performed by Rosenzweig et al. [37] in the overdense regime. An initially large radius
These results suggest that a beam model incorporating the assumptions used in
deriving the Bennett pinch solution, namely that after phase mixing, the beam obeys the
incorporate the solution of this equation at each longitudinal beam slice self-consistently
into the code NOVO, as described in Chapter 2. In order to stay away from the trivial
solution to these equations, where the beam is totally deconfined, the beam must be
forced to have some initial density at the leading edge. This is done by incorporating a
solenoidal field in the model, which is not uncommon for such a beam-plasma system, as
many plasma devices rely on a solenoidal field to radially confine of the plasma column.
what role initial conditions play in more rapidly achieving the equilibrium state—how to
match the beam into the plasma channel. Section 3.3 discusses this matching starting
from the simplest case of initially focusing the beam to the equilibrium radius. The
matching problem is greatly facilitated in the case of longitudinal tailoring of the plasma
density on a length scale of , so that preferential focusing of the beam body brings a
closer resemblance to the Maxwell-Vlasov equilibrium case. In all cases, the quality of
37
the initial match has implications for the plasma accelerator, ultimately affecting the
Long term propagation in the blowout regime is achievable only when there is a
sufficiently strong plasma focusing gradient and a large enough beam density. The beam
density is responsible for the rate of channel formation, as well as the ultimate degree of
rarefaction of the plasma electrons. In turn, the focusing gradient this generates over
most of the beam feeds back on the peak maintainable beam density for the given set of
conditions. This section develops a model of these dynamics which gives a set of minimal
The beam matched to the ion channel equilibrium beta function derived earlier,
1/2
= n
. (3.3)
2 re n0
eq
To simplify the mathematics, it will initially be assumed that the entire beam is subject to
the same focusing gradient as seen at the beam’s longitudinal center, or that the beam
head suffers no additional radial expansion. The correct treatment of this expansion
appears in the next section using the Maxwell-Vlasov treatment, where the results are
compared to the present mode. Using this equation for a Gaussian beam with Nb electrons,
Nb Nb ren0
nb = 3/2 2 = . (3.4)
(2 ) z r 2 n z
38
Even for a very long beam, this beam density must be greater than the plasma density, on
which it explicitly depends. Shorter beams, of the kind optimally suited for a plasma
wake-field accelerator will also require evaluation of the time needed to create the channel.
As the plasma electron motion is mainly driven by the beam’s radial electric field, it can
Near the beam axis (where the space-charge force is linear), the equation of motion for
r ′′ − k2 r = 0 (3.5)
where the prime indicates a derivative with respect to , and k 2 is treated as constant by
assuming that the beam density is constant and equal to the maximum value, and is given
by the expression:
k2p nb
k 2 = 2 renb = . (3.6)
2 n0
Note that this expression also neglects the restoring forces due to the charge imbalance in
The solution of equation 3.6 is, taking a plasma electron to be initially stationary
at radius r0 ,
r = r0 cosh(k ) (3.7)
Since the plasma electron density is proportional to the distance between electrons,
n0
n(k ) = . (3.8)
[ cosh(k )]2
39
Requiring that the beam channel be sufficiently rarefied by the beam’s longitudinal
this result was derived assuming a constant current profile, it can be used to estimate the
beam is given by (corrected from the original publication [38] by supplying a missing
factor of 2),
6
k z > . (3.9)
2
Squaring equation this expression and substituting into equation 3.6 gives an expression
for the self-consistent beam parameters needed for the major portion of the beam to
nb 36
> . (3.10)
n0 (k p z ) 2
36 n
Nb > . (3.11)
re (k p z )
Incorporating, also, the limit on the bunch length in order for the wake field not to be
18
Nb > n
(3.12)
re
by more than an order of magnitude for low-charge beams intended for FEL applications,
40
with Nb = 6.25 ×10 9 , n = 1 mm-mrad and = 40 . For an example at higher charge, the
5. The safety margin is somewhat narrower using the original AWA design numbers with
n = 750 mm-mrad and Nb = 6.25 ×1011 , which just barely satisfies the inequality by a
factor of 1.5.
This analysis has so far neglected the radial return forces arising from the plasma
oscillatory response. A more accurate estimate comes from including the return force on
the plasma electrons, which was ignored in equation 3.5 by assuming nb / n0 >>1 . With
r2
r ′′ − 2 re nb − n0 1 − 02 = 0. (3.13)
r
Without attempting an exact solution to equation 3.13, the additional term is no larger
than n0 in the limit of large r , where it corresponds to the electrostatic contribution of the
ion column. The solution to this equation will have r at least as large as the old solution
(Equation 3.10) if nb / n0 is incremented by one. With this change, equation 3.10 becomes,
nb 36
> +1 , (3.14)
n0 (k p z ) 2
nb
≥ 3.86 . (3.15)
n0
An exact solution of Equation 3.13 modifies this numerical factor only slightly, yielding,
nb
≥ 3.45 . (3.16)
n0
41
In assuming no beam head expansion, this number will be seen to be an underestimate.
Allowing the beam head to expand, as in the one-dimensional model discussed below,
has the effect of moving the pinch point backwards. In order to keep it at the same
location, the beam density must be increased by a proportionately much larger amount.
The same beam expansion dynamics can be solved with the aid of one-dimensional
theory using the same assumptions as were made above, but with the correct model for
the beam expansion as a function of . The solution thus obtained will check the validity
of the assumption that the entire beam is exposed to the maximum ion channel focusing
gradient, with no additional beam head expansion. Allowing all quantities to depend on
the new variable, Z = kp (ct − z), the equations governing the plasma electron expulsion
and the beam envelope evolution can be written in dimensionless form for a long beam
2
X 1 1
2 + 1 − 2 X = , (3.17)
S R X3
2
R 1 nb 1
= X +1 − 2 , (3.18)
2 n0 R
2
Z
X is the beam radius in units of the equilibrium radius in an ion channel. To aid in
understanding the dynamics represented in these equations, it should be noted that Eqn.
3
3.17 is simply the beam envelope equation with the usual 1/ r emittance term. Setting
S = 0 in this equation recovers the solution for the equilibrium radius ( X = 1) in the
limit that R is large. Likewise, the second equation is that of an oscillator with period of
42
2 , or p in real units, driven by the nb term, or just the dimensionless form of Equation
3.13. The derivation for Eqn. 3.18 uses the approximation Z ≅ kp c t , which is only
valid when the bunch length is short compared to the betatron period. Including the extra
convective terms needed to make this an equality introduces an additional time scale into
the problem and would not allow writing this equation in dimensionless form. Numerical
integration of these equations on a grid including 1000 longitudinal beam and plasma
slices reveals the time evolution of the pinch point location (defined as the position where
point behind the head of the beam Zpinch is, at first, quickly changing, but reaches an
choosing nb n0 appropriately in this case, the final value of Zpinch (≅ 2.5) has been
intentionally made to be equal to 2 , in agreement with the earlier criteria for channel
rarefaction by half the effective width (the center) of a Gaussian beam with z = 2k p−1.
nb
≥ 8.4 . (3.19)
n0
The extra beam head expansion allowed in this analysis changes the requirement for
nb n0 from the old value of 3.45 to the much higher value used in this case of nb n0 = 8.4 .
Comparisons of this solution to the full axisymmetric fluid code shows agreement of the
two methods over a wide range of the remaining variables in the problem, namely the
asymptotic value for the pinch point is reached faster in units of the energy depletion
length, which rises linearly with . It is, therefore, not possible to stay on the rising edge
of the slope, thus enabling use of a smaller nb n0 , by going to a higher energy drive
43
pulse. Actual cases will behave even worse in this respect since this model neglects any
beam energy losses due to wake-fields, as this will modify the expression for the matched
radius over the propagation distance and lower the beam density.
The fact that satisfactory performance is only achieved at fairly high values for
nb n0 merely indicates that the original criteria of rarefaction by the center of the bunch
is much too strict. Effective drive beam propagation for the initial set of experiments can
be achieved with 90% rarefaction by the beam’s falling edge, or nb n0 ≅ 2 . This value of
nb n0 is sufficient to assure effective propagation of the drive beam in the plasms. The
remaining electrons in the channel must also be sufficiently rarefied by the arrival of the
trailing beam. The outward momentum for these particles after the passage of the drive
beam helps in keeping this density down. The remaining electrons will respond to the
trailing beam’s space-charge forces, and can lead to emittance increases due to a
44
Figure 10. Evolution of the pinch point as a function of S , the propagation distance in
45
3.2 Maxwell-Vlasov model of the drive beam
In the systems of interest here, a large part of the beam propagates in an ion
channel, where linear focusing allows a very straightforward beam model to be applied.
The head and transition region, where the rarefaction is not complete, are influenced by
the nonlinear radial forces found in such channels. The fact that the plasma electron
rarefaction there is more pronounced near the axis leads to a betatron oscillation period
that is longer for beam electrons having radial orbits going far away from the axis. The
work of Bennett [39] on self-focused streams considers the mixing from this spread in
frequencies as one of the mechanisms leading to a nearly steady-state beam solution; the
same sort of dynamics were considered by Rosenzweig et al.[40] in the analysis of a self
pinched beam in the overdense regime. Taking, for the moment, the plasma focusing
potential V(r) ≡− ∫ F(r ′ )dr ′ as a given in the problem, the beam distribution will obey
pr f f
+ Vr (3.20)
m r pr
having dropped the f t term by invoking the above mixing arguments. The solution to
The solution for R(r) makes use of the fact that near the axis, the potential is approximately
linear and no mixing can occur. The phase-space density near the axis, f (0,0) is, by
Liouville’s theorem, a constant of the motion. With this constraint, Equation 3.20 can
now be solved while also keeping the number of particles constant, with the transverse
46
R(r) = b [1+ (r / b) ] ,
2 2
(3.22)
where b is the Bennett radius. This radial density distribution is characterized by tails
much longer than for a Gaussian, and can account for a sizable fraction of the total
charge.
In the dynamic case, when the plasma electron distribution is quickly evolving as
a function of , the NOVO solution for the plasma fields supplies Vr at each longitudinal
mc2eBz 2
Vr = ∫ (Er − B )dr + r (3.23)
4
where the second term is the focusing contribution from the solenoid. This leads to a
Nb −ap2r
f (r, pr ) = exp[ −aW(r)] exp (3.24)
(2 ) 3/2 z pz 2 m
the spatial part of which is again used as a driving term in the plasma dynamics equations
Computational results
The Vlasov equilibrium of the last section and the NOVO equations, modified to
be consistent with a longitudinal magnetic field from the solenoid, as described in Chapter
2, can now be used to simulate the behavior of the beam-plasma system with different
choices for the drive beam charge, emittance, and plasma density. These simulations are
then compared to the result from the last section, where the drive beam was assumed not
The simulations require one additional parameter choice, the strength of the solenoid,
47
which yields an equilibrium beam radius for the leading edge of the beam of,
1/2
2m c2
= e n
(3.25)
sol
eBz
The initial expulsion of the plasma electrons is much delayed for k much larger than
sol p
unity due to the return current flowing inside the beam, thus making the plasma electron
motion longitudinal. For this reason, the condition sol pk < 2 has been maintained. The
resulting value of the magnetic field makes the cyclotron frequency much lower than
other time scales in the problem, p >> c, and therefore only slightly modifies the
plasma dynamics.
The effects of varying the charge while keeping all other parameters constant is
and = 300 . Here, the plasma begins to be nearly totally rarefied at the beam’s longitudinal
center for all bunch charges over Q = 20 nC, for which nb, eq / n0 = 4.0 , but only appears
result.
Figure 12 displays the results of varying the emittance while holding all other
to equation 3.19, rarefaction at the middle of the beam should be achieved for all emittances
smaller than 110 mm-mrad, while in Fig. 12 the rarefaction has already slightly deviated
density in order to reveal the effects of varying the quantity k p . The normalized beam
spot size is plotted as a function of for a beam with parameters Nb = 6 ×1010 , = 300 ,
z = 1 mm . Only the case with n0 = 1 ×1014 rarefies well, as has been anticipated. for
48
smaller plasma densities, the focusing is not strong enough to focus the beam to much
higher density that the plasma density, and in turn, the plasma electrons are not expelled
as quickly by the beam density. For much larger densities, the plasma has time to respond
to the beam charge and the beam is well focused, but simply not denser than the plasma.
In this case, electron expulsion is further delayed by the greater amount of charge
imbalance at the higher plasma density under conditions of a partially formed channel.
Results from the radial equilibrium treatement discussed up to now can be compared
4000 in this case, which evolve self-consistently with the computed plasma electric and
magnetic fields. Such initial conditions do not guarantee a final beam shape which accurately
matches the Maxwell-Vlasov equilibrium. This is mainly due to the lack of damping of
beam electrons at the extreme leading edge of the beam. These particles are subjected
mainly to the static solenoid focusing field, and will collectively oscillate in radius over
long distances, in a way not consistent with the equilibrium analysis. For distances much
shorter than these oscillations, the head of the beam will initially expand to sizes much
larger than the solenoid equilibrium radius sol for the particular beam emittance. Figure
14 shows a comparison between the two computational techniques when the beam has
propagated for 10 and 20 cm in the time-dependent analysis. At the longer distance, the
beam head has undergone a greater amount of expansion, but the longitudinal position
where beam density reaches an acceptably high level remains unaffected. Finally, these
propagation distances are long in comparison to the transient erosion effects, such as
were found in the one-dimensional analysis. According to the earlier result, this reorientation
49
100
εn 400 mm-mrad 15 nC
kpσz 2 20 nC
25 nC
n b,eq/nb (kp ξ)
10 30 nC
35 nC
1
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4
kp ξ
50
1000
N 30 mm-mrad
6 x 1010
100 mm-mrad
kpσz 2
150 mm-mrad
100
n b,eq/nb (kp ξ)
200 mm-mrad
300 mm-mrad
10
1
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4
kp ξ
Figure 12. Normalized beam spot area, as defined in Fig. 11, for a number of different
emittances with other parameters held constant ( Nb = 6 ×1010 , k p z = 2 , = 300 , and
z = 1 mm )..
51
104
N 10
6 x 10
σ 1 mm
z
n b,eq/nb
100 1E12
1E13
10 1E14
5E14
1
-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 -0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
ξ (cm)
Figure 13 Normalized beam spot area as a function of , as defined in Fig. ?, for a
number of different plasma densities with other parameters held constant ( Nb = 6 ×1010 ,
n = 100 mm-mrad , = 300 , and z = 1 mm )..
52
1000
z=20 cm
Maxwell-Vlasov equilibrium
z=10 cm
100
n b,eq/nb (kp ξ)
10
0.1
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
ξ (cm)
53
3.3 Matching
of the drive beam to the plasma's ion channel. An attempt to match the body of the beam
to the focusing gradient of a fully formed ion channel only matches those parts of the
beam which do, in fact, propagate in a channel. This leaves the beam head, the transition
region, and part of the beam body in an unmatched state, resulting, in the short term, in
betatron oscillations for those beam slices. The effect of an unmatched beam head also
leads to a several eq -long reorientation process during which the beam distribution is
rapidly changing, ultimately resembling the radial equilibrium of the previous section,
with a greatly expanded beam head and a Bennett-like radial profile in the transition
region. This section begins with a definition for ideal matching, which, as it will be seen,
consequences of various types of mismatch: greater beam expansion and reduced PWFA
performance. The bulk of the Section explores the idea of using a 'matching section' at
the beginning of the plasma column in an effort to more faithfully emulate the ideal
matching state. This matching section has, in general, a plasma density different from that
found in the rest of the column; its special lensing properties act as a beam conditioner to
manipulate the beam distribution to more closely resemble the ideally matched state.
An ideally matched beam will, shortly after being introduced into the plasma,
propagate with no betatron oscillations for each longitudinal slice. This condition is quite
restrictive, and may not be achievable in practice. In order for a beam-plasma system to
qualify as ideally, the beam would, initially, have to resemble the final state, having an
expanded beam head and a Bennett-like transition region. Such a beam is not at all
commonly available from accelerators; the most common model for accelerator-derived
54
beams has a Gaussian distribution in six dimensions. Starting with such a beam, which
has no correlation between z and orientation of the transverse phase space ellipse, it is
very difficult to manipulate this phase space as a function of z in the precise way
required for an ideal match. Given that the introduction of the beam into the plasma will
almost always result in some amount of mismatch, it is instructive to explore the negative
The rapid initial expansion associated with a mismatched beam head, as was
stated earlier leads to the rapid (≅ 6 eq long) reorientation of the head and transition
region, resembling the process of emittance-driven erosion. During this expansion, the
effective beam centroid for wake-field generation moves backwards in the beam frame,
since the beam density at the head, and hence the wavenumber for the radial expulsion of
the plasma electrons k 2 = 2 ren0 , tends to diminish with time. This causes a phase shift
in the longitudinal wake-field, which, if uncompensated in some way renders the final
optimum accelerating phase initially on the wrong side of the ion channel collapse. The
region where the ion channel collapses is characterized by plasma electron densities
much higher than the background, sometimes as high as 30n0 , and mildly relativistic
motion which causes highly nonlinear fields due to decoherence of the plasma oscillations.
Trailing beam electrons caught on the wrong side of this point would be severely disrupted
and lost in the course of crossing over. Even for electrons starting on the correct (accelerating)
phase, the maximum available radius for linear focusing is diminished, since, closer to
Betatron oscillations at the transition region can result in the same type of phase
shift. In this case, the phase will oscillate with time, making this situation harder to
correct with the plasma density tapering technique proposed for erosion-caused phase
shifts.
55
For portions of the drive beam which always propagate in an ion channel, some
amount of mismatch is tolerable. For a relativistic beam, the forces imparted on the
plasma electrons will be independent of the beam radius, as prescribed by Gauss' law.
The idea developed in this section it to use a plasma lens as a beam conditioner in
such a way that it can manipulate the different parts of the beam to approximate the
desired matching state. The most basic requirements for such a scheme are that the beam
head is matched to an external focusing channel, as with the solenoids in Figure 15, while
the body is matched to the ion channel focusing. Additionally, the changeover between
these two modes should happen on the appropriate length scale, or roughly at the pinch
point. Beam slices behind this point point, ought to propagate identically in the system.
This requirement argues for having a matching lens with the same longitudinal wavenumber
for the ion channel formation, k 2 = 2 renb , as is found in the plasma column, or that the
beam density in the matching lens and the plasma column be approximately the same.
This is only a requirement on the beam density and radius, and not a requirement on the
plasma density in the matching section, as long as it is underdense. The idea behind this
scheme is for the beam to ‘sample’ the later plasma focusing in the much shorter matching
section. With the help of appropriate external focusing, these time varying radial kicks
are then translated to differential beam sizes at the start of the column.
upstream end of the matching lens, with a peak beam density that is close to the target
density in the long plasma column. By using a higher plasma density in the matching lens
the beam body can be focused this beam even further toward the lens exit. To simplify
the discussion, a thick lens with phase advance of = /4 will have the beam exiting
56
the lens also at a waist, but one where the beam density is higher than before. The action
of the second set of quads is to demagnify this beam and bring about another waist at the
start of the column. If the plasma lens is short compared to the distance to the plasma
column, the beam head will also be demagnified by approximately the same amount.
The idea of a matching lens can best be described with a real example. Using a
1 GeV beam with n = 50 mm-mrad into a n0 = 1 ×1014 cm −3 plasma for the column, the
matched beta function is eq = 3.35 cm. Inputting a beam radius at the start of the lens
1
that is twice the equilibrium (2 eq ) will result in a beam core radius that is roughly 2 eq
toward the end of the lens. In this example, this can be accomplished with a 5.7 cm long
plasma lens with n0 = 1 ×1014 cm −3 . The drift length from the lens exit to the second set
of quads is 0.5 meter, along with a 2.0 meter drift from the quads to the plasma column.
Using point-to point imaging, these quads will demagnify the beam by a factor of four, so
that the beam body is 28 microns and the beam head is 112 microns. The head of this
beam would need a very strong solenoid, having a longitudinal field of 60 kG, impractical
for this application. This example does show a mechanism by which the beam head and
near-ideal match. Wake-fields in the matching lens will cause a certain amount of beam
57
energy modulation, on the order of 2.5% in this case, but not enough to cause achromatic
number of ways. The choice of a thick lens, simplifying this example, can be replaced
with a thin lens, so that the waist can be after the lens exit. This can bring about a much
larger decrease in the beam radius without increasing the peak beam density in the
plasma.
Beam conditioning similar to the type discussed in the last Sub-section can also
be accomplished with a smoothly varying ramp at the start of the plasma column, although
not as effectively. Some finite in longitude rising edge of the plasma density will always
be present in real devices, and must be accounted for in focusing and matching calculations.
This section considers a sin 2(kr z) functional form for such a rising edge, examining
phase advance ≅ /2 and solutions for the beam body in this matching region. The
effect of this ramp on respective parts of the beam can be explored with an analytical
model for ion focusing using the expression for the focusing experienced by the beam as
The plasma density profile is, then, specified by the following expression:
n0 (z) = 0 (z < 0)
= nm sin2 (k rz) (0 < z < 2kr ) (3.27)
= nm (z > 2kr )
58
In the plasma boundary region (the ramp, 0 < z < 2kr ), the equation of motion for the
d2x
+ K0 sin 2(kr z)x = 0, (3.28)
dz 2
where the constant K0 = 2 re nm / . Note that Eq. 3.28 is formally the Mathieu equation
[41] in the region of rising density. Use of the Mathieu form guides the discussion of the
matching problem. For example, we may look for solutions that match a waist (that is
be true, any ray which is initially parallel must either be parallel or cross the x = 0 plane
at z = 2k r . In short, this requires simultaneous odd and even periodic solutions of the
Mathieu equation. However, the theory of Mathieu equations explicitly denies this
possibility, since the odd and even solutions have distinct frequencies (that is, K0 must
be different for the two types of solutions) [41]. Thus the beam strictly must not be at a
waist at the beginning of a ramp, but in fact must be converging to achieve a match at
z= /2 kr .
In practice, the best way to derive the initial conditions at the beginning of the
ramp is to start with the desired match at z = /2 kr , and solve the envelope equation for
d2 2
2 + K0 sin (kr z) =
2
3 , (3.29)
dz
backwards in z . In keeping with the previous discussion, we can classify the ramped
/2 kr / 2 kr
dz
≡ ∫ (z)
= ∫ 2
(z)
dz (3.30)
0 0
59
which is approximately n /2 , with n equal to a positive integer. For example, the
The time dependent model of the plasma fluid response can now be applied to
smoe real cases, after stating some additional requirements for the system. The first is the
the plasma conditions do not change appreciably over the distance from the head to the
tail of the beam, which can be quantified by requiring k r z << 1. This is satisfied in all
the calculations given below, where the beam length is typically 1 mm, while the rise
concerning calculation of the wake fields behind the beam, k p << kr , which is satisfied
−1
for the denser regions of the plasma (which are the cases of interest, since k p ≈ z ).
The matching of the beam body, which is here defined to be the last half of the
beam, is illustrated in Figure 16. In this case, the ramp is 1.63 cm long (k r = 0.964 cm −1 ),
Figure 14. It should be noted that the beam has a virtual waist (that which is obtained if
the plasma is removed) of 123 microns, which is not much larger than the ion channel
equilibrium. Thus the matching section in this case does little to suppress beam head
oscillation and loss. A matching section which allows the initial external focusing to be
eased (since the virtual waist is larger), must use a longer ramp, in this case with a phase
advance ≈ . The virtual waist for these conditions is 149 microns, and so the depth of
the initial focus is over twice eq . The evolution of the rms transverse size of the beam
body is shown in Figure 17. The collisionless damping of the beam size oscillations
indicates the presence of some deviation from constant, linear focusing in the bulk of the
plasma.
60
200
175
150
125
σ (µm)
100
r
75
50
25
0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
z (cm)
Figure 16. Matching of the beam body with a ramp of length 1.63 cm (k r = .964 cm − 1 ),
corresponding to = /2 . The beam-plasma system has the same parameters as in
Figure 14.
61
200
150
σr (µm)
100
50
0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
z (cm)
Figure 17. Matching of the beam body with a ramp of length 3.33 cm (k r = 0.472 cm −1 ),
corresponding to = . The beam-plasma system has the same parameters as in Figure
14.
62
3.3.3 No matching section
If neither a separate matching plasma lens nor a sin 2(kr z) ramp can be used for a
given PWFA design, the system must be designed in such a way as to mitigate the initial
wake-field dephasing and betatron oscillation effects. The transient beam erosion-caused
dephasing can be cured simply by tapering the plasma density in this region so a lower-
density plasma at the start of the column compensates the phase difference by virtue of a
longer p . The peak acceleration field in this region is diminished at the expense of
maximizing the stably accelerating phase space region—the accelerator bucket size—by
delaying the channel collapse region during times that the beam shape is still changing.
Even with such a correction in place, the beam-plasma system is still susceptible to a
periodic modulation of the wake field when the body and transition region are mismatched.
More study is required to pinpoint the exact cause of this effect, but it is plausible that a
combination of beam initial conditions and plasma density modulations can be found that
cancel it. Solutions to these phase stability problems are obviously needed for any actual
accelerator design, but will increasingly play a role in the ongoing PWFA-related
experimentation.
Conclusion
This chapter has covered many aspects of beam propagation of short pulses in the
underdense regime. The one-dimensional equations introduce the idea that the most
important parameter for the plasma wake-field accelerator is the normalized matched
beam density, nb n0 . Depending on the specific goals, this number should be anywhere
from 2.0 to 8.5. Two-dimensional simulations give a much more detailed picture of beam
and plasma dynamics. Use of a beam model that incorporates the Vlasov equation, as is
done for the case of a Bennett pinch, illustrates the effect of the nonlinear dynamics
63
present in the transition region, near the beam head. This model is a good predictor for
the amount of beam head expansion during the initial phases of propagation. Without
resorting to lengthier time-dependent calculations, this model can give a quick estimate
order to maintain high quality acceleration and focusing fields for the trailing beam, the
effects of drive beam betatron oscillations and emittance-driven erosion on the plasma
dynamics must also be considered. These conditions can be optimized either by using the
conditioning properties of thin and thick plasma lenses on the drive beam, or by modifying
the plasma density as a function of length in order to compensate for phase differences.
64
Chapter 4. Applications of PWFA Technology.
Future research into the mechanism of plasma wake-field acceleration will bring a
clearer picture of how to apply it to an eventual collider application. So long as this idea
studies will address the final use of this technology in an increasingly detailed manner.
One milestone would be the construction of a test accelerator, possibly using a 0.4-1 GeV
drive beam deposited into several plasma sections and accelerating a >10 GeV trailing
beam, in a setting geared to test extending this acceleration to much longer distances. The
design of such a test facility would have to tackle many of the issues of a final collider
There does not, at present, exist a clear enough picture of the final form of a
plasma-based collider facility. Continuing progress may identify new problems, or reveal
new ways of optimizing the setup to better meet a specific set of goals. In the meantime,
it would be very helpful to visualize the future by initiating a collider facility design
which is much less detailed, and ignores many of the topics outlined in Chapter 1. Such a
design would reveal likely choices for quantities such as the power efficiency, the repetition
rate, the accelerated charge and the facility size and physical layout. In this way, plasma
When considering plasma wake excitations operated in the blowout regime for a
collider application, it ought to be stated at the outset that ion focusing only works for
accelerating a negatively charged species. The ion channel, whose radial force is focusing
65
for electrons will defocus and radially eject any positrons. Regions where positrons
would be focused, and are confined to the fairly small volume of the channel collapse
region, also characterized by large plasma electron densities and velocities that would be
detrimental to beam quality. The blowout regime is only suitable as a basis for e − − ,
- or e − − e − colliders.
Any collider design based on wake-field technology must also consider the
transformer ratio to be used in operation. Early wake-field studies placed much importance
on this number. It was argued that if one uses a 1 GeV beam to impart only a 2 GeV gain
for the trailing beam, the advantage of high gradient is lost in the amount of space needed
to create the driver. A solution to this was pointed out by W. Gai[42], who suggested
creating a bunch train in one work-horse linac and distributing these among a set of wake
modules, thus creating a ‘hardware’ transformer. Limitations on the drive bunch length
due to hosing instability problems require just this sort of a solution if one is to keep the
detail below, was proposed by J. Rosenzweig[43] at the 1996 Snowmass workshop. This
design uses a counter-propagating distribution network for the drive bunches, which
necessarily fixes the spacing between bunches in the drive bunch train. To synchronize
the arrival time of a drive bunch at its respective plasma module to the passage of the
trailing beam, the drive bunches must be separated by twice the plasma cell spacing. This
calls for either a high bunch train repetition frequency or very long plasma sections. In
this example, each plasma section is 5.7 m long, and the space between modules is 2.66
m, which translates to a 55 ns periodicity within the bunch train. Although the subject of
multi-bunch effects in the linac must be examined with much greater care in the context
of such an application, the 55 ns spacing seems adequate for suppression of the unwanted
66
deflection modes. At the same time, these bunches are spaced closely enough together to
Additional considerations when choosing the beam and plasma wake parameters
in the modules include the plasma wavelength and the maximum deceleration gradient.
Longer plasma wavelengths ease the problem of time synchronization between the drive
and trailing beams. The beam and plasma parameters for a single module, listed in Table
acceleration gradient, 1 GeV/m in this case, and longer wavelengths, 2.2 mm in this case.
The 3 GeV initial driver energy assures that some of this energy remains at the end, and
the beam does not completely decelerate in the plasma. The projected wake-fields are
excited by 20 nC in the drive bunch at an rms bunch length of z = 0.8 mm, and a
for TTF, and are in line with performance capabilities of state-of-the art photoinjectors
using bunch compression. As the maximum accelerating wake is below the wavebreaking
limit for the chosen plasma density, the design is also flexible in terms of generating
1300 MHz structure. For the set of parameters considered, the majority of the input RF
power , 78%, is coupled to the beam, with a relatively smaller percentage for wall losses.
As stated above, this requires careful thought about removing power coupled into the
higher order modes in the form of wake-fields. Both deflection (m=1), and axisymmetric
(m=0) wakes must be considered, as they can affect the transverse position and final
energy of buches as a function of relative delay from the start of the bunch train. The
power dissipation and related issues. A peak power of 5.9 MW during the 14.5 µs bunch
67
length and 5% duty cycle dissipates an average 66 kW per section, not a very high value
Parameters for evaluating the entire facility as a whole are listed in Table 3.
Assuming that the plasma wake-field mechanism can be 20% efficient (20% beam loading),
this implies that 2 nC can be accelerated in the system. A combination of beam loading
and off-crest operation makes the final energy 1.25 TeV, which assumes a more conservative
0.87 GeV/m acceleration gradient instead of the 1.0 GeV/m listed in Table 1. The overall
size of the facility will be 4.3 km, plus additional space needed for the gamma converter
and detector. Collisions would occur in this facility at an average rate of 3.5 kHz. This
would require a total wallplug power of 335 MW, or an overall efficiency of 7.6 %, a
quite attractive number considering that power coupling through the plasma medium
Thus far, nothing has been said of the method of switching the drive bunches to
their respective modules, and then combining the drive and trailing beams so they are
coaxial. First, the short spacing between bunches, as well as their high energy, forces this
to the 180 degree bends at the start of each module. The final stage of this bending is to
be performed without the use of a magnet; considering the very high energies of the
trailing beam, a strong magnetic field would cause cause too much synchrotron radiation
and must be avoided. Instead this drive/trailing beam switching would have to be performed
with very high frequency rf kickers, in the region of 50 GHz. The stability of the RF
the collider.
68
Figure 18. Schematic of a - collider using a hardware transformer scheme.
Table 1. Drive beam and accelerating module parameters for the plasma wake-field based
collider depicted in Figure 18.
69
Avg. accel gradient 6 MeV/m
Shunt impedance ZT2 30 MW/m
Active length 500 m
Cavity length 1.1 m
Peak RF power (cavity) 5.9 MW
Number of bunches 2 x 250
Beam current (in fill) 690 mA
RF flat top 14.5 msec
Duty cycle 5%
Avg. bunch rep. rate 865 kHz
power/cavity 66 kW
power 30 MW
Total avg. beam power 104 MW
Accelerated charge 2 nC
Wake efficiency 20%
Length of Collider 1 x 2.16 km
Accel. beam energy 1.25 TeV
Avg. collision rate 3.5 kHz
Drive linac/wall effic. 40%
Total wall power 335 MW
Total efficiency 7.6 %
70
Chapter 5. The AWA Facility
The collider design presented in the last chapter made use of photoinjector technology
for drive pulse generation. The beam quality (emittance) and high charge per bunch Q
these devices are capable of make it difficult for other technologies, such as the thermionic
gun, to compete. The success of the AWA plasma experiments has, likewise, depended
diagnostics that not only address the usual difficulties arising in the measurement of a
photoinjector beam, but also work with the high amount of charge present in this system.
In parallel with this, numerical simulations and laboratory experience have suggested
strategies for optimizing the beam parameters needed for high gradient plasma wake-field
generation. The plasma experiment also required the addition of a pulse splitter in the
laser path introduce a witness pulse with a variable delay behind the main pulse.
The second part of the chapter discusses the beam diagnostics developed for use
with the plasma experiment and elsewhere in the beamline. The placement of this topic in
the present chapter is meant to emphasize the fact that diagnostics development has
strongly been governed by the theoretical and practical considerations outlined in the
5.1 Introduction
In the original simulations for the design of this system, Ho and Schoessow[44]
showed that the gun could produce 100 nC, a number previously thought to be very
waveguides, emittance was considered to be a less important parameter than the bunch
length. These initial gun and linac dynamics studies yielded an rms normalized emittance
71
The AWA drive linac consists of a single cavity gun followed by two standing
wave linac sections operating at L-band (1300 MHz), as shown in Fig. X. The UV (248
nm) laser is brought in slightly off-axis and travels the length of the linac before striking
the 1.6 cm diameter magnesium photocathode. After gaining about 1.5 MeV in the gun
cavity, the electrons are focused by the gun solenoid and further accelerated by 8 MeV
(design) in each linac section. One additional solenoid between the two linac tanks is
used for matching the beam into the smaller diameter beam pipe and quad triplet following
the linac (aperture clearances in the linac sections are 4 inches in diameter). During
operation, the RF system described in Figure 21 allows control of the power and relative
phase of the RF into each cavity; crystal diode detectors monitor the forward and reverse
locked to a sub-harmonic of the RF, with a phase shifter to control the relative timing of
Gun solenoid
Linac solenoid
Drive gun UV laser
Figure 20 shows the layout of the drive gun in relation ot the 4.5 MeV witness
gun. The two beamlines are combined with a dipole chicane so that a properly delayed
72
block diagram of the laser system for driving photoemission. This system is based on a
dye oscillator and uses the Nd:YAG oscillator simply to pump the dye laser, as opposed
to chirped pulse amplification (CPA) systems in which the YAG is hte primary oscillator.
Figure 20. The AWA drive and witness beamlines (simplified view).
Klystron
Variable coupler.
To linacs Phase shifter
φ To Gun
KW amp
81.25 MHz To laser system
φ 75X synthesizer Nd:YAG mode locker
73
Figure 22. AWA laser system block diagram.
This section considers a different operating point for the AWA linac than the
100 nC case originally envisioned. The most compelling reason for this comes from the
scaling laws for plasma wake-field generation. The largest contribution to bunch lengthening
wake-field Ez strongly depends on the drive pulse length. Wavelength scaling of the
−2
Ez / Q ∝ z (∝ n0−1 ), (5.1)
of the wake-field per unit charge on the bunch length. The same scaling also prescribes
74
an emittance,
n / Q = const., (5.2)
needed to achieve the same beam radius in units of k p −1 . This means that any effort to
relationship between emittance and charge from this equation. The rapid dependence of
for short bunches, at the expense of emittance and charge. The remainder of the motivation
for conducting these simulations came from the need to account for experimental conditions
different than those assumed in the initial proposals for the AWA project, including a
smaller diameter photocathode, no sagitta for the laser pulse, small apertures downstream
of the accelerator (the drive-witness beam combiner chicane has a 2.2 cm vertical aperture),
and lower than anticipated cavity fields. One additional consideration in favor of lower
charge is the difficulty in estimating the errors arising from the electrostatic approximation
of the beam space-charge fields used in PARMELA. This code has been compared with
an electromagnetic code ITACA [45] for the TTF case [46] (8 nC, t ,laser = 20 psec at
L-band) by Serafini and Colby [47], but it may cease to be accurate given an order of
magnitude more charge. Finally, the low-Q simulations have been extremely valuable in
guiding the operation of the machine, as well as devising tests of machine performance
Obtaining an estimate for the plasma response given the original AWA drive linac
design results from Ho’s 100 nC study [48], with z = 2.9 mm and n = 750 mm-mrad,
the maximum wake-field is initially 250 MeV/m, assuming a Gaussian in time pulse.
as seen by a v ≈ c test particle in the 10 cm long n0 = 2 × 1013 cm−3 plasma. Ho’s work
75
did not include information about the longitudinal profile of the bunches, with more
recent simulations revealing a steeper than Gaussian temporal falling edge which allows
raising the plasma density to achieve a 750 MeV/m maximum wake. The precise shape of
the beam’s tail is, therefore, crucial to estimating the amount of beam loading this causes
at a given n0 , and therefore the maximum achievable wake-field. The amount of beam
loading is important both in thinking about how to optimize the accelerated bunch parameters
and in measuring the bunch profile actually going into the plasma.
Although the AWA design is fundamentally very different from the present
conception of a photoinjector, the discussion of the beam dynamics present in this machine
will greatly benefit from a brief review of the concepts used to design the majority of
photoinjectors. Many of the current photoinjector designs are intended as drivers for an
FEL, placing much attention on the emittance and energy spread of the beam. The most
important contributions to the final emittance are the thermal, space-charge, and RF
components. The thermal emittance results from the electrons being emitted from the
cathode with some finite random velocity, as happens when the laser photon energy
exceeds the work function of the cathode material. This term is usually a small fraction of
the overall emittance; the rest of the design exercise takes the form of trying to preserve
pictured in Figure 23. The transverse and longitudinal field patterns of this mode are,
Ez = E 0 cos(kz)sin(wt + 0) (5.3)
76
Figure 23. Radial cross-section and electric field pattern of -mode 2 12 cell gun.
but a more realistic field profile will include higher-order spatial components which
become more prominent closer to the irises and thus cause an emittance increase. Even in
the absence of these higher-order terms, Kim’s treatment [49] points out that the time-
dependent nature of the radial RF forces acting on the bunch may result in different
space. This effect will be minimized for a launch angle 0 which results in the bunch
exiting the last cell at 90 degrees, which is approximately 0 = 81 degrees for the present
case. The next, and usually the most important effect is the space-charge component of
the emittance. This derives in part from radial nonlinearities in the space-charge defocusing
current profile will also cause a longitudinal variation in this force, resulting in yet
another bow-tie, usually with the higher current center of the beam at a different betatron
phase than the head and tail. A method of overcoming this effect, as developed by
Carlsten [50], involves finding betatron orbits which are insensitive to small changes in
the beam current. This is called space-charge compensation of transverse emittance and,
77
and drift length between the gun and later accelerating cavities.
The evolution of the longitudinal phase space, often spoken in terms of the
spread for FEL applications, and to enhance the compressibility in magnetic bunch
compression, space-charge and wake-field effects. Launch phases 0 less than 90 degrees
will tend to shorten the pulse, while the longitudinal component of the space-charge will
lengthen it. For a PWFA driver not using magnetic bunch compression, longitudinal
emittance considerations simply reduce to obtaining the desired current profile with an
energy spread low enough not to cause chromatic effects in the focusing elements that
match the beam into the plasma, with less of a concern about the correlation between
Because of the very high charge and current output of the AWA, and the fact the
initial emittance requirements were not very strict, the design chosen for this machine
greatly differs from convention. Magnetic compression for such a beam may not be
feasible because of the emittance dilution associated with coherent synchrotron radiation
in the compressor bends, a problem which lacks a complete and well-accepted theoretical
treatment at the moment. The AWA design has never been subjected to an emittance
AWA drive linac the initial laser spot on the cathode is very large, and subsequent
corrections are all a function of the radius, a fundamentally different approach. Examples
the solenoids and path length differences, all of which are capable of linear and nonlinear
radial corrections on the electron population. The cumulative effect is for the final state
78
of an off-axis particle to be close to the phase space orientation of a particle born close to
the axis.
The laser pulse delivered to the photocathode has a cupped shape, or sagitta, with
larger radius electrons being emitted before those at smaller radius. This is accomplished
with a custom designed pulse shaper by optically delaying the laser pulse in a discrete set
of radial rings, with the delay thus introduced being much larger than the original laser
pulse length. This has several effects on the electron beam dynamics within the gun
cavity. For a cavity operated in bunching phase, advancing the launch of the off-axis
particles results in less acceleration in the cavity. The space-charge forces for a cupped
electron pulse are also very different than for a disk-like one, having a longitudinal
component which causes an energy spread in the opposite direction. This beam is allowed
to expand to a very large radius (almost 5 cm for some electrons) before being focused
with the nonlinear solenoid, having a spherical aberration with a shorter focal length at
larger radii. The off-axis electrons also travel a longer path, partially reversing the original
sagitta. After undergoing the corrections of longitude, energy, and transverse momentum
as a function of radius, the bunch distribution is ‘frozen out’ by further acceleration in the
linac sections.
The work to optimize AWA operation at lower charge was begun with the version
of PARMELA modified by Ho[48]. As this early version of PARMELA did not include a
treatment of the image charge forces when the bunch is close to the cathode, it was
desirable to switch to a later version of PARMELA which included this capability (Ho’s
work used the code TBCI-SF to correctly model these early electromagnetic effects). The
simulations presented in this section were all performed with a PARMELA modified by
Eric Colby [51], who also ‘set up’ the AWA linac problem by using the code SUPERFISH[52]
to solve for the cavity RF modes and POISSON for the solenoid fields, to be used as an
79
input to PARMELA.
The features of the AWA designed manipulate the beam as a function of radius
proved to work against achieving the best results at lower Q . The biggest problem is the
long drift length after the gun to the first focusing element (~12 cm) and to the first linac
cavity (~24 cm). Even at Q =25 nC, the space-charge induced energy spread the beam
accumulates in the drifting state causes chromatic focusing and emittance dilution in the
After carrying out simulations with a variety of starting conditions, the operating
point shown in Figure 24 appears to be a good compromise between bunch length, charge
and emittance. As an aid in finding the best possible parameters, sets of simulations were
automatically run while varying one of the input parameters such as the initial laser
radius, the solenoid strengths, and the injection phase. Additional simulations were
simulation uses a much smaller launch phase, 0 = 37 degrees, than the 81 degrees called
for in Kim’s theory. The smaller 0 causes a bow-tie that partially cancels the chromatic
effects in the solenoid, which are already diminished because of the reduced energy
the solenoids around z = 15 cm and z = 150 cm , because the emittance estimate does not
take into account the twisting motion of the beam in the solenoid, which is a function of
radius due to the lens nonlinearity. The fact that n appears to become smaller in the drift
space after emerging from the second linac tank may be a sign of emittance compensation
in the beam system. A plot of the longitudinal phase space, shown in Figure 25, reveals
that a negative correlation between energy and z is possible by off crest operation in the
linac. This solution does not take account of the energy lost to wake fields in the linacs,
80
which takes away much of this correlation.
Q 25 nC
0 37 deg.
E gun 80 MeV/m
E linac 16 MeV/m
n 350 mm-mrad
z 2.2 mm
81
Figure 24. Standard case simulation output.
82
Figure 25. Longitudinal phase space after the linac.
83
5.3 Diagnostics
In the course of this work, the beamline after the accelerator, as well as the layout
of the plasma experiments described in Chapters 6 and 7 have undergone many changes.
The diagnostics described in this section have been used as building blocks to provide the
High resolution measurements of the transverse beam profile have been essential
for many stages of the experiment. The pepper pot emittance diagnostic described at the
end of this Chapter, in which the resolution should be comparable to the hole diameters
(~300 microns), is one such application. The focused electron beam spot size inside the
plasma chamber, with a beam radius as low as r = 250 microns, is one of the pieces of
data used to estimate the peak beam density, a crucial parameter for the plasma experiments.
In the course of the experiments, beam imaging based on phosphorescent screens, optical
Optical transition radiation (OTR) can be used in several ways to reveal detail
about the beam distribution under test. Because this radiation is peaked at an angle
=1 from the beam direction, the radiation pattern from a finite divergence beam will
reveal information about its angular spread. If an OTR surface is to be used simply as a
transverse profile monitor, the light signal from a single electron will appear to come
from a point source if the CCD camera is focused onto the OTR surface, different form
the case of angular divergence measurements, where the camera must be focused at
infinity. The resolution of this method at optical wavelengths can, in theory, be comparable
to the wavelength of the light, according to reference[53]. This reference also gives an
84
estimate for the resolution in an experiment, which achieved 14 µm resolution for light
centered on the visible region. The method of OTR imaging was chosen to diagnose the
focused beam spot inside the plasma chamber under plasma-off conditions because it has
the advantage of not saturating under intense beam conditions. A 30 nC beam mostly
contained within a circular region with a 1 mm diameter may saturate the phosphor
coating. The surface generating the OTR used in the ANL experiments was simply a
front surface silvered mirror mounted at 45 degrees to the beam direction. One disadvantage
of using OTR is a relatively low intensity light output. This forces the use of a wide-open
camera iris, also needed to collect light from large angles, and some image amplification.
The video signal, therefore, contains a larger noise level than for a typical phosphor
screen image.
several ICT’s used in the system. Since the decay time of the signal from this device is
short (about 20 ns), the electronics processing the signal can be made to reject the any
dark current contribution. The ICT, therefore has an advantage over the Faraday cup,
which is an inherently destructive measurement, is sensitive to the dark current, and can
The ICT’s used are commercially available from Bergoz, and are claimed to have
a linear response with bunch rise times of a few picoseconds[54]. Since it is difficult to
find an electronic source capable of such short pulses other than a photoinjector, this
claim is difficult to test on the bench. ICT’s have become an accepted way to perform
this measurement and are used in a number of photoinjector facilities having shorter
85
pulses than AWA. The ICT’s used in the present work have been calibrated with pulses
as short as 1 ns, in the arrangement depicted in Figure 26. The ICT acts as a pulse
stretcher, and, therefore, does not reproduce the original pulse shape. It does, however,
reproduce the pulse area, as given by the equation given for the voltage Vout into a 50
25Ω
∫ Voutdt = ∫ Ibeam dt (5.6)
N
With a 100 ns integration window on the oscilloscope, the measured value for N was
40.1, where the manufacturer’s value was 40.0. The measured value of N did not
significantly change upon using a longer ~100 ns excitation pulses. The difference between
the measurement and the quoted value is within the error of the measurement method, so
the quoted value has been retained for use as the instrument’s calibration value. In the
actual beamline application, there is a significant (~30 m) length of cable between the
ICT and the signal processing electronics. The test in Figure 26 was repeated using
different cable lengths between the ICT output and the oscilloscope, up to 120 m. The
dispersive properties of the RG-58C/U cable used significantly alter the pulse shape, but
the integrated signal suffers little loss, 4% in the cable used for the experiment. This
86
Figure 26. Test setup for the calibration of the ICT.
Faraday cups used in the beamline belong to one of several types. The most
common of these combines a lead beam stop with a phosphor screen profile disgnostic.
To allow the camera to view the phosphor surface, the face of this diagnostic is inclined
45 degrees to the beam direction. This geometry degrades the accuracy of the measurement
by allowing a fraction of the particles to scatter in the metal and emerge at >45 degrees
without being stopped, amounting to probably a 15% signal loss when using lead. Since it
was necessary to measure the amount of charge entering the plasma chamber, this also
required the use of a Faraday cup, this time mounted at normal incidence to the beam.
One method of gaining information about the temporal characteristics of the bunch
is by intercepting the beam with a prompt radiator and directing the light to a streak
camera. Cerenkov radiation and optical transition radiation (OTR) are both feasible sources
of optical radiation, with a Cerenkov plate generally giving a stronger signal. The geometry
in Figure 27 is useful for a solid radiator, such as quartz. The Cerenkov angle for quartz
87
(index of refraction n = 1.46 ) is ~45 degrees. The radiated phase-fronts form a cone in
the material, but the collection optics can select only a small part of this cone, in this case
the radiation whose azimuthal angle is very close to the direction of the plate inclination.
The diagnostic can be designed so that the radiation exits the dielectric at the Brewster
angle, which suppresses internal reflections for the polarization of the photons of interest.
Multiple reflections can cause an apparent lengthening of the pulse, and were further
suppressed by roughening the upstream surface of the dielectric. An idea for further
suppressing these reflections in future experiments is to paint this surface with an optical
absorber.
The light emerging from the diagnostic must then be collected and sent to the
streak camera, a Hamamatsu model C1587 for the present experiments. At the light input
of this instrument, the radiation is collimated with a slit, with an opening of between 10
and 40 microns appropriately set for obtaining the highest resolutions for this instrument
(approaching 1 psec). Beam trajectories parallel to the reference in Figure 27 but higher
or lower on the page will take a different amount of time to arrive at the streak camera.
To avoid this time spreading, the optics from this diagnostic to the streak camera must be
able to map the signal from two electrons that differ only in y (out of the page) onto the
slit. Whenever the experimental geometry requires an image rotation between the source
and the streak camera, this can be accomplished with a dove prism (see reference[12]), or
Applying this diagnostic to the experiment to determine the extent of beam self-pinch
in the plasma, it was necessary to obtain both temporal and transverse information about
the beam distribution. The imaging optics for relaying the light to the streak camera
consisted of two high-quality achromatic lenses (model AAP 1000.0-76.2 from CVI
Laser, Inc.) with a 3 inch diameter and 1 meter focal length. The use of achromats
88
enables the shorter wavelength Cerenkov light to be transmitted with very similar optical
properties to the incandescent light used to align the system. The lenses were mounted 1
meter away from the Cerenkov radiator and the streak camera, with a 2 meter space
between them. This enabled an undistorted viewing area at the source with a diameter
larger than the diagnostic. This feature is important, as an improper choice of optics will
truncate the signal at some radius, and also result in aberrations close to this radial limit.
The resolution can further be degraded when the beam multiple-scatters in the
diagnostic, both within the quartz plate, and at the copper foil used as an air-vacuum
transition in the focusing experiment. The transverse resolution of this diagnostic was
estimated to be 80 µm, which is negligibly small when added in quadrature with the
5.3.4 Pepper-pot
using the quadrupole scan technique often used for GeV-energy beams. A 'pepper-pot'
89
measurement[55] overcomes this limitation because most of the beam charge is scraped
away. This device is simply a metallic plate with a pattern of holes going through it. It
acts as a beam mask, by either stopping or significantly scattering the electrons crossing
the bulk of the material. The electrons selected by the hole regions never come into
contact with the material, and emerge as a series of beamlets. The dynamics of the
over significant drift lengths. After drifting, the transverse spreading of these beamlets
from their original size, as well as the location of the beamlet centroids, is measured
using a phosphor screen. For low enough charge, this is a measurement of the angular
distribution of the electrons going through each hole. The data can be analyzed to yield
not only the emittance but also the beam divergences in both planes, which is a valuable
The pepper pot design appropriate for measuring the AWA beam's emittance was
influenced in part by the large amount of charge per bunch as well as the relatively large
emittances anticipated. For the first step in this design process, the ratio Rb of the
space-charge to emittance terms in the envelope equation for each beamlet, following the
treatment of Rosenzweig and Travish [56], gives quick estimate of the amount of space-
charge forces still present in the drift after the pepper pot, but adapting the result to a
I r
2
Rb = , (5.7)
I0 n
with I being the peak current prior to collimation, I0 = 17 kA , n the normalized emittance
and r the radius of the holes. The pepper pot should also be designed with a hole size
much smaller than the anticipated beamlet size on the phosphor screen. Anticipating the
90
large angular spread of the AWA beam, it was important to have as large as possible an
angular acceptance for the beamlets, defined by the ratio of the hole diameter to the plate
thickness. Electrons having comparable angles will effectively see a smaller hole and
contribute a smaller signal. The same geometric effect will guarantee that a significant
number of such electrons will encounter the inner surface of the hole and scatter. Small-angle
scatterings will appear as a halo around the main beamlet image on the phosphor and
distort the measurement, particularly because outlier particles in the transverse phase
space contribute a disproportionate amount to the final emittance measurement. For this
reason, much care was taken to measure any true outliers accurately. The final design
criterion was, then, to have a hole spacing equal to six times b, the anticipated rms
beamlet size on the phosphor screen. Given a slightly irregular image, this also helps in
identifying from which hole a given part of the image may have originated.
The final choice for the emittance mask design, shown in Fig. 28 has 26 holes of
The spacing between the holes is 3 mm. The ram-electron discharge machining (EDM)
process used to fabricate the mask resulted in slightly tapered holes, with a diameter
approaching 400 µm toward the downstream side. This taper greatly diminishes the
possibility of an electron actually hitting the side of the hole, even in the case of a slight
misalignment with respect to the beam axis, and thus represents an advantage for accurately
91
Figure 28. The emittance mask design.
Resolution
The design criteria outlined in the previous paragraph can now be evaluated,
using some assumptions about bunch characteristics. The most important resolution limit
in this measurement will be due to the finite hole size. A beam with no angular divergence
will have an image that reproduces the mask pattern on the screen. The transverse rms
beamlets of this perfect emittance beam will have a size x = 80 µm, which will seem
spot size and 15 MeV. This number is the resolution of the measurement system due to
finite hole size, and is much smaller when added in squares to the actual beam emittance.
A similar resolution limit results from the finite space-charge force within a single beamlet.
Using the same numbers, Q = 20 nC, and a beam current which is constant within its
0.75 cm (25 ps) length, the beam radius will evolve according to r ′′ + k2 r = 0 (keeping
the self-force of a relativistic beam. The beam density in this example is 1.06 ×1011 ,
92
making kz = 0.1 . The x = 80 µm spot size computed above would increase by another
0.4%, making the space-charge limit to the resolution negligible in comparison to the
resolution limit due to finite size holes. To say this another way, the ratio of the emittance
to space charge terms is equal to Rb = 10−3 for typical beam emittances. One additional
limit to the resolution comes from the fact that the bulk of the charge does not actually
stop within the mask, and is, therefore, present after the beamlets have been formed. The
space-charge force from these scattered electrons can interact with the beamlets and,
likewise, limit the measurement resolution. The large angular spread of the scattered
electrons, which are uniformly distributed within a solid angle approaching 2 , means
this effect is only significant in about the first 5 cm after the mask. The nonlinear kicks
will be confined to an area where the scattered electrons’ radial profile closely matches
the original beam size, or within ~1 cm from the mask. The error in centroid position for
a beamlet near the core can be up to 0.7 µm, with a smaller error at larger radii. Treating
this like a random error in beamlet centroid position, the effect on resolution is still much
smaller than that from finite hole sizes. It should be noted that the linear forces, although
they will not affect the emittance measurement because the beamlet pattern will expand
Emittance Measurement
Figure 29 shows a CCD image of a 20 nC beam generated during the first trial of
this pepper pot design at ANL. This data has already had a dark current image subtracted
from it; the dark current image is taken at a different time but remains relatively constant
central peaks, but secondary peaks and tails are also present. Even though the peaks are
very narrow, the tails sometimes extend more than half way to the adjacent peak, as in the
93
lower right hand corner of the image. This can complicate the process of data analysis
because it may not be possible to decide from which hole a given part of the signal has
originated. At the same time, the tails are intense enough above background to be discernible
from the background by visual inspection alone, a feature very helpful at the analysis
stage.
A more useful way of viewing this data is to project a row of beamlets onto the
horizontal axis. The projection of a rectangle drawn around all of the signal belonging to
the second (from the top) row of beamlets is shown in Fig. 30. The signal has two sources
of background in it: the noise associated with the CCD camera having a value of 14.5
(full video is 255), and the background associated with electrons scattered by the full 1.5
mm width of the tungsten plate, with a value of 0.35. The first source of background can
94
most easily be minimized by using a wider camera aperture (and less gain in the CCD
camera's internal amplifier), and further reduced by using a cooled CCD array. The
second source of background is small enough and constant enough to be easily subtracted
away. The background in the signal data of can be compared to the a (smoothed)
background sampled by moving the integrating rectangle between the second and third
rows of beamlets. The presence of tails, as found to the right of the first and second peaks
in this data, causes the signal to rise above the background level. This data also shows
that the original design criteria, of sufficiently separating the peaks, has been met. The
only possible exception is the presence of tails long enough to approach the adjacent
rejected because it would result in the beam to be sampled in too few places. The
remainder of this section describes the methods used for the analysis of this data.
95
28
26 signal
background
24
projected intensity
22
20
18
16
14
12
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
position (pixels)
Figure 30. Projected image from one row of beamlets and (smoothed) background sampled
between the rows.
96
Data Analysis
One strategy for analyzing pepper pot data is to assume a functional form for the
data, such as a set of Gaussians, and make a fit to the data. If a Gaussian is not the correct
2
function, this will lead to a large and make it difficult to estimate the error due to the
choice in fit function. The “bow-tie” phase space profile commonly seen in photoinjector
simulations has a much sharper than Gaussian peak, and a functional form which changes
depending on the orientation of the phase space ellipse. Thus, the choice for a fit function
is a difficult one, further complicated by any inherently 3-D effects in the real system.
The present analysis uses an alternative approach. Since the pepper pot data is a
measurement of the angular distribution as sampled at each hole, the data can directly be
translated to a phase space distribution. The data can then be treated with a linear
transformation on the phase space capable of removing the x - x ′ correlation, which also
has the property to preserve the actual and measured emittance. When the data is projected
onto the x ′ axis, it more closely resembles a Gaussian, since the noise and fluctuations in
the individual peaks are washed out. After these steps, it is much easier to interpret the
data by appropriate choice in fit function, or by directly computing the rms width of the
distribution, or the 95% rms width, a number much less senstive to noise.
The first step in the data analysis is to define a set of active areas within the image
associated with each beamlet. A set of rectangles serve this purpose (see Fig. 31), as well
as to define the origin of the local coordinates for each beamlet. Depending on whether
the beam under test is converging or diverging in x and y , the peaks in the data will have
a separation different than that of the holes in the mask: if (xi, yi ) are the set of vectors
for the mask holes, then the peaks on the phosphor screen will be at (ax i,byi ), and
fi (x, y) is the data of the i th rectangle (beamlet) in its local coordinates. At this stage in
97
the analysis, a and b (the amount that the rectangles are stretched in either direction) are
set by the user and can be varied around the optimum value. Finally, quantity ∑ ∫ fi(x, y)dy
i
is used for computing the emittance in the x-direction, but this must first be justified in
terms of the definition for the emittance chosen for this measurement.
Figure 31. The grid used for analyzing the emittance data.
This analysis makes use of the statistical definition for the emittance of a particle
=〈 x 2 〉〈x' 2 〉 −〈 xx' 〉2 ,
2
(5.8)
where the brackets are statistical averages. The method is simplified by the fact that is
For a given value of k, the second (correlation) term will vanish. Because the difference
of the two terms is a constant, this value of K also minimizes the first term. The
emittance, therefore, can be measured by evaluating only the first term and minimizing
with respect to K .
98
Evaluating the first term, 1 , in the case of the actual emittance data yields:
where x is the RMS beam size at the mask and xi is the x-location of the ith hole. This is
the same type of linear transformation as proposed above, therefore, 1, x equals the
For the data presented (Q = 20 nC), x is .45 cm and x′ = 2.0 mrad, resulting in
an emittance of n,x = 280 mm-mrad, assuming a 15 MeV beam. This data was taken
predicting the normalized emittance due to the uncertainty in beam energy. It is possible
that the energy may have been as low as the 10-12 MeV range during this particular day
of operation. This would correspond to a lower emittance value, approaching 200 mm-mrad,
and in better agreement with the later measurements at slightly lower charge (Q = 7 −14
nC) where the emittance was n = 130 and 149 mm-mrad, respectively. These numbers
are slightly better than the PARMELA prediction, in part because the beam collimation at
Any direct comparison between drive linac performance and simulations requires
detailed knowledge about all the variables in the system. The inputs to a simulation
include the cavity modes, amplitudes and phases, the laser spatio-temporal distribution on
the cathode, the launch phase, and the magnet settings. For the real system, the description
of the measurements performed to establish the working parameters will reveal that
enough pieces of information are missing to make a direct comparison with simulation as
99
yet unfeasible. This is unfortunate, as a direct comparison to simulations has the capability
of either spotting some error in the theory or pointing out a weak component in the
system.
The electron beam dynamics in later parts of the linac system are, to a large part,
governed by the emission from the cathode. Included in this are the transverse profile and
temporal extent of the laser on the cathode, the bulk quantum efficiency of the cathode
and any spatial variations, the electric field in the cavity (Schottky enhancement effect),
and the relative timing between the laser and the RF field.
The transverse laser profile is measured by splitting a part of the laser light before
it strikes the cathode, and allowing it to propagate in air an equivalent distance where the
specially processed YAG wafer supplied by Star Tech Instruments Inc.). A typical laser
spot, displayed in Figure 32, contains some degree of clustering of the laser energy, or
hot spots. The impact of such a laser spot on the subsequent electron beam dynamics
cannot be predicted with only a 2-D model, and thus must remain a project for the future.
The temporal extent of the laser is monitored with an autocorrelator (before amplification
100
Figure 32. Laser transverse profile on cathode.
cathode have given a result as high as 1.5 ×10 − 4 , somewhat lower than the 5 ×10 − 4
achieved at Brookhaven’s ATF. No attempt has been made to quantify any variations of
this quantum efficiency as a function of position on the cathode, but prolonged use brings
the appearance of darkened spots on the cathode surface. The most likely cause for these
is contamination from pump oil. These dark spots are probably associated with a drop in
The launch phase is not an easy parameter to measure for any photoinjector
ATF’s solution is to process the signal from a stripline beam position monitor and mix it
with the RF. This gives the final phase of the electron bunch; the initial phase can be
inferred by using a model for the accelerating field in the gun to solve for the amount of
slippage. A less direct method involves measuring the beam divergence after the gun exit
and fitting this to a model of the gun’s performance. For the AWA system, a reference
101
point is established by changing the phase to maximize the charge (measured at the first
ICT). The Shcottky enhancement effect is known to boost the quantum efficiency at
0 = 90 degrees, when the electric field is maximum, although not as sharply as at other
facilities due to the higher photon energy used at AWA. For performing a quantum
efficiency measurement, the amount of charge scraped from the beam before it arrives at
the first ICT depends on the solenoid and linac settings. The apparent quantum efficiency
peak will, therefore, depend on the charge lost up to that point. One additional attempt to
establish 0 involves changing the phase in the direction of 0 = 0. For small amounts of
charge (below 4 nC), simulations show that the beam current has a sharp cutoff, with no
beam emitted for 0 < 0 , and a stably propagating beam for 0 > 0 . An attempt to
observe this phenomenon in the laboratory produced ambiguous results, the two methods
used for the measurements showing a 20 degree difference among them. By adjusting 0
in the direction of zero, the beam spot at the spectrometer screen disappeared much
Attempts to establish the field strength in the gun cavity have been the least
precise, and have thus raised the most questions. The drive gun has neither a coupling
probe to measure the field, nor enough space after it for a beam energy measurement. The
net input power, measured to be as high as 2.0 MW, would result in a 98 MeV/m peak
on-axis acceleration gradient in the absence of other losses (the design value is 1.5 MW
and 92 MeV/m). One possible loss mechanism is dark current loading of the cavity,
which is difficult to quantify because of the inability to measure the total amount of dark
current, including electrons that never emerge from the cavity. An additional method of
obtaining cavity field information is through the response of the beam to the gun solenoid
- too strong a setting will cause overfocusing and beam loss. When compared to the
PARMELA results, with the gun field as a free parameter, this data is most consistent
102
with a 55 MeV/m [57]. This number seems too pessimistic; considering the high amount
Operation of the linac requires a choice for the RF input power and phase to the
cavities, the magnet settings and the laser profile and timing. Except for the laser timing,
it ought to be possible to reset all the other parameters to some interesting operating point
from a past run. The laser timing can then be set in reference to the delay which maximizes
the ICT signal. The original operating point is established in reference to the cavity phase
shifts which maximize the dark current energy peak on the spectrometer; the cavity RF
inputs are set to the maximum value where arcing is not a problem. Upon setting the
focusing lattice to achieve good beam transmission through the machine while avoiding
gross overfocusing, the beam energy, energy spread, and bunch length can then be
measured. The fairly accurate beam measurements required for the focusing experiment
of Chapter 6 yielded the results summarized in Table 5. Since this experiment intended
to measure radial dynamics and not wake-fields, it was not necessary to expend a great
deal of effort in optimizing for short bunches. It is hoped that more effort in this regard
will eventually produce even shorter pulses, resulting in higher acceleration gradients in a
plasma.
Q 7-14 nC
Bunch length 25 +/- 3 psec FWHM
Eb 14.5 MeV
103
5.5 Creation of a witness beam in the same cavity as the drive beam
For the PWFA experiments it was necessary to probe the wake fields left behind
by the drive bunch with a separate witness beam. One possible choice was to use the
beam from the witness gun, having 200 pC and 4.5 MeV. The biggest drawback of this
approach was the problem of having to focus both beams, which have different energies,
with the same matching solenoid. For this to work, the witness beam must come to a
waist in the middle of the solenoid and to another waist at the beginning of the plasma,
while the drive beam has only the second waist. The witness beam is also susceptible to
the space-charge force of the drive beam, with large steering errors possible at the point
where the two beams are combined. At the final waist, these steering errors would have
to be measured with both beams on, a difficult measurement to do in the presence of the
two orders of magnitude more intense drive beam. In view of all this, it was decided to
pursue a different method of generating a witness beam for the PWFA experiment, that of
generating the witness beam in the same cavity as used for the drive beam.
If two laser pulses are incident on the photocathode in the same RF cycle, but
separated by some time, the result will be two distinct electron bunches. Several factors
influence the relative timing between these bunches. Launching the bunches off-crest in
the gun will tend to move them closer together (RF compression, about a 20% effect).
Longitudinal space-charge will push them apart. The two beams also have very similar
final energies. The energy of the witness pulse can be increased by off-crest operation of
the linacs. In simulations, this energy increases countered by longitudinal wake fields in
the linacs, which will lead to an additional 0.47 MeV energy loss for the witness beam in
this case. A witness beam with a slightly higher energy than the driver was desirable
because we wanted to measure an energy increase in the witness. It was hoped that the
104
witness beam energy spectrum on the spectrometer could always be distinct from the
drive beam, including the no-plasma background. For the purpose of matching both
beams into the plasma, it was also necessary for their radial dynamics to be very similar.
To equalize the radial space-charge forces of each bunch, the two laser pulses must have
the same power density, but with a smaller radius witness bunch. The optics system to
create these two laser pulses consisted of two coaxial mirrors oriented in the same
direction. The front mirror has a 1.6 mm hole in its center, allowing this part of the laser
pulse to reach the back mirror and be delayed in time relative to the rest of the pulse,
mostly reflected by the front mirror. Inserting a card between the two pulse-shaping
mirrors blocks the trailing pulse and terminates the witness beam.
The effect of the pulse splitter was simulated with PARMELA by delaying
photocathode emission for all electrons within a given radius. The final longitudinal
phase space from this simulation (Figure 33) does not include the effect of wake fields in
the linac on the witness beam energy. Computing these losses with the code ABCI[58]
results in a 0.47 MeV less energy for the witness, making its energy distribution blend
beam and a 6 mm separation between the pulse shaping mirrors. This witness pulse is less
than optimal because of the high amount of charge and a bunch length greater than a
plasma half-period.
105
Figure 33. Longitudinal phase space of a drive and witness beam created by delaying
emission by 40 psec. Wake-fields would lower the energy of the witness by an additional
0.47 MeV, causing it to blend with the drive beam’s energy distribution.
106
1
0.8
Current (arb. units)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0
t (psec)
Figure 34. Streak camera projected image of drive and witness beam.
107
Conclusion
This Chapter has examined the AWA photoinjector dynamics from the point of
identifies a beam in the range of 20-30 nC as the most suitable as a plasma wake-field
driver. The simulations performed at this operating point address all final beam quantities
of interest: emittance, energy, energy spread, bunch length, and bunch longitudinal profile.
For the actual operation of the machine, the initial simulations have provided only a good
starting point. Even if somewhat loosely coupled to actual laboratory practice, the
simulations have provided valuable insight into the underlying beam dynamics. The
process of conducting these simulations has generated many ideas about constructing
tests of beam and accelerator conditions, as well as how to streamline machine tuning
Also covered were the diagnostic techniques necessary to characterize both the
initial and final beam distributions in the plasma experiment. All initial beam measurements
are of the time-integrated sort and are not sensitive to time dependent effects such as the
bow-tie shape in the phase space. A time-dependent emittance measurement was originally
considered, but abandoned primarily due to an anticipated lack of signal after emittance
mask collimation. Apart from the time-dependent considerations, the beam instrumentation
108
Chapter 6. Drive Beam Focusing Experiment in the Blow-
out Regime.
plasma wake-fields in the blow-out regime can be divided into two separate problems.
When radial spreading of the drive beam is not significant, such as in the case of very low
emittance, the given drive beam must be shown to excite plasma radial and longitudinal
wake-fields in accordance with simulation results. For larger emittance beams, the radial
effects must also be adequately understood. Since each of these areas is a difficult
research topic on its own right, it was a natural choice to attempt an understanding of the
Past underdense propagation experiments have used beams much longer than a
plasma wavelength, typically the ~1ns long beams from an induction linac. These
experiments have quantified the long-term, or asymptotic, erosion rate due to a combination
of inductive and emittance mechanisms, but do not include measurements of the transient
erosion behavior, important for predicting the propagation characteristics of short (< p )
beams. These experiments have also been concerned with a finite in radius plasma, as
would result from either pre-ionization with a laser beam or self-ionization by the electron
beam. The remainder of experiments with a short plasmas (thin and thick plasma lenses)
[59]and long plasmas [37] have been in the overdense regime, where the focusing force
depends on nb and not n0 , and the radial dynamics are generally very different. Only one
experiment [60] has made use of a photoinjector-derived beam; such beams are often
characterized with a slice emittance much smaller than the projected emittance, a concern
which will be revisited toward the end of the chapter. The present experiment is, therefore,
109
the first measurement of the focusing properties of a short beam in an underdense
plasma.
A separate goal for this experiment is not only to obtain a predictable response
from the beam-plasma system, but to observe beam radial confinement which is adequate
in terms of PWFA performance with the beam on hand. It was not obvious that the proper
conditions for this would be met from the start, as the initial emittance estimates were in
fact larger than those encountered in the experiment. It was uncertain that the combination
of emittance, charge, and bunch length would satisfy the requirement from Chapter 3,
nb, eq n0 ≥ 2.0 , to make long term propagation in the underdense regime possible. Upon
meeting this requirement, there is also a choice about the length of the plasma which is
sufficient to probe the long term propagation characteristics. The transient part of the
erosion takes place in the first ≈ 4 eq , so the length chosen for the plasma, Lp = 12 cm is
over twice as long. Extending the plasma to lengths much beyond this, where the drive
beam core is allowed to lose most of its energy, is undesirable because, in an experiment
where the energy spectrum of the spent beam is not diagnosed, the fractional energy loss
can become a large uncontrolled parameter. For the n0 ≅ 1 ×1013 cm −3 plasma used, the
fractional energy loss is below 15 %, and the effect on beam propagation will be small in
case of a discrepancy between the actual and simulated energy loss. The choice of
plasma length was also dictated by the amount of position and pointing jitter of the
incident electron beam. A self-guided beam will propagate in the direction of the initial
centroid motion; a 10 mrad initial error becomes a 1 cm error in the beam centroid x at
the end of a meter long plasma. The jitter encountered with only a 12 cm plasma length
confirmed that measurements would have been rendered far more difficult if using a
longer plasma.
As this Chapter initiates the discussion of the plasma generation hardware, the
110
first Section is devoted to a description of the plasma cell used in the experiments and the
The plasma source used for the focusing and acceleration experiments was first
fields at the AATF. This device is a DC hollow cathode arc discharge (HCA) using
10 −4 −10 −3 Torr of Argon (an excellent review of HCA’s can be found in reference [61]).
cm. The cathode consists of two concentric Tantalum tubes. Unlike previous such HCA's,
the gas was fed into the device in the annular region between the tubes in order to isolate
the incoming electron beam from the higher gas pressure, as well as from the irregular
plasma profile which occurs in the cathode region of these devices. The plasma column is
confined in the radial direction with an axial magnetic field in the range of several
hundred Gauss. The plasma density can be varied by adjusting the gas flow, the arc
In planning for the present work, the peak acceleration field anticipated was
around 250 MeV/m, with a deceleration field of around half this number. With the
original plasma length, it seemed possible to completely deplete the energy for a large
portion of the drive beam. This is undesirable because at the point of depletion the bunch
profile changes drastically, uncontrollably altering the radial and longitudinal wakes. A
new length was chosen for the plasma column, 15 cm. To shorten the column it was
necessary to alter the confinement field pattern and to bring the two electrodes closer to
the center of the device. New pole piece inserts were fabricated for the confinement
111
solenoid end-plates to achieve the correct geometry for the magnetic field in the new
configuration. After operation of the now more compact plasma source, excessive heat
buildup became apparent on glass insulator and O-ring seals closest to the cathode. This
problem was solved with a bigger multi-layer heat shield between the cathode and the
O-ring, use of 500° F rated vacuum O-ring grease, and forced air cooling of the glass.
Figure 35. The modified plasma source, shown without beam diagnostics.
112
An ion channel matched beta-function of 0.5 cm for a 1 ×1014 cm -3 plasma
introduced another set of constraints on the experimental device. The beam would have to
be focused with a strong lens close to the cathode. A solenoid was chosen for this
because the focal length could be altered by changing a single control. Achieving this
beta function also meant a beam convergence of 32 mrad rms, or an unobstructed cone
with an opening angle of 7 degrees to keep beam scraping at the 3 percent level. This
with a tube length much greater than its diameter, since the plasma density in our device
becomes large near the tip and the beam must travel the length of the tube with no
focusing. The first modification involved a new design for a shortened cathode holder
cooling channel and input flange, and cutting 0.5 inches from the tip of the cathode tube.
During the first plasma wake-field experiments, 3 nC out of 15 nC were scraped from the
drive beam, owing mainly to the fact that the beam energy was lower than expected. The
entire cathode assembly was redesigned for the focusing experiment using larger diameter
inner and outer tubes of 5/8" and 3/4" outer diameters. This improvement greatly minimized
the amount of scraping, but still required careful alignment of the beam to the aperture
center.
The plasma density and profile were measured with a Langmuir probe and also
with a 140 GHz interferometry technique. The probe used during beam experiments was
constructed from 0.32 mm thick Tantalum wire, and a Boron Nitride insulator. This probe
could be remotely actuated to measure the plasma density at any time during the experiment.
Using a slightly different arrangement, the radial dependence of the density can be
integrated and directly compared to the mm-wave interferometer data, which measures
the same quantity by measuring the phase shift of the waves as they pass transversely to
the plasma column. The two techniques disagreed by 20%, with the probe registering the
113
lower density. The interferometry technique is considered the more accurate one, therefore
In order for the plasma to be coupled to the linac, it was necessary to bridge the
very different vacuum requirements of the two devices. One solution is to separate the
two vacuum chambers with a foil, thin enough to keep the multiple scattering emittance
increase under control. Keeping this emittance increase low usually requires placement of
the foil near a beam waist. As heat radiation prevented placing the foil near the plasma
start, and a separate waist upstream would have required the complexity of having additional
quadrupoles, the idea was ultimately rejected. Another possibility for isolation is by using
differential pumping, the method chosen here. A 1500 l/s Sargent Welch turbomolecular
pump was attached to the vacuum chamber upstream of the cathode, reducing the pressure
by a factor of 400. The AWA beam line also contains two additional 150 l/s turbo pumps
between the plasma experiment and the drive gun. The pressure in the gun cavity typically
increases by about 2 ×10− 7 Torr during plasma operation. This extra load on the gun is
primarily due to argon atoms, so the risk of contamination is minimal. The added gas
pressure has not been observed to increase the incidence of arcing in the gun or linac
The plasma chamber used in the experiments is shown in Fig. 36, with electron
pulses derived from the AWA beam entering from the left. The beam energy used for
these experiments was E = 14.5 MeV. Beam diagnostics immediately upstream of the
integrating current transformer (ICT) and Faraday cup to measure Q , a phosphor screen
and, an optical transition radiation (OTR) screen at the focal point of the -matching
114
solenoid to obtain transverse beam profile images. The bunch length was measured by
refocusing the beam onto the Cerenkov radiation diagnostic at the end of the plasma, as
described below.
Figure 36. Diagnostics beam line and plasma cell (shown without the plasma radial
confinement solenoid). The anode diagnostics include (a) tungsten collimator with (b) 1
mm wide slit, (c) 500 µm thick quartz Cerenkov plate, and (d) mirror and outgoing light.
with a Langmuir probe, and found to be within 10% of the peak value over the nominal
plasma length, with a steep initial ramp near the cathode tip. The half-maximum point,
115
important to note that the arc current density in the beam region is four orders of magnitude
smaller than the beam current density, and thus does not significantly affect the beam's
transverse motion. The plasma density is typically measured at the start and finish of a 1
measured while the plasma is on, and thus are not simultaneously measured along with
the beam's final state under the influence of plasma focusing. These quantities are also
measured before and after the plasma run, to eliminate the possibility of a drift in accelerator
conditions. The plasma focusing experiments demand that Q be measured for every shot
using the upstream nondestructive ICT, at which point the charge is larger than that
propagating in the plasma chamber, due to a small amount of scraping by the cathode
simultaneous measurements with the ICT and FC1, the Faraday cup following the cathode,
with the charge measurements performed at these two locations being well correlated.
The initial focal spot size near the waist of the -matching solenoid was measured
with plasma off at the OTR screen located at FC1. Some of these profiles deviated
asymmetric shape with an aspect ratio as high as 4:1. The 25% of the shots having an
asymmetry larger than 2:1 were rejected for the purpose of this analysis. The remaining
images tested for peak intensity as well as for fractional integrated intensity inside a test
radius of 0.28 mm. A symmetric Gaussian with x= y ≡ r, having the same integral
defines an effective radius, which was found to be nearly independent of Q , with mean
value of r =284 ±24 µm. The presence of mild asymmetries causes use of the effective
Gaussian, a 25 psec FWHM longitudinal bunch profile, as described below). The actual
116
value from the peak intensity in the image data is nb / n0 =2.0 and 2.5 at Q=7 and 14 nC,
respectively, and the plasma is well underdense at beam input for all experimental conditions.
The beam divergence x′ and bunch length were measured with plasma off using
the anode diagnostics, including a 1-mm wide (4 mm deep) tungsten slit aperture followed
by a 0.5 mm thick quartz plate inclined 12 degrees to the beam direction. A portion of the
radially polarized outgoing Cerenkov light from this diagnostic (transverse resolution is
80 µm) exits the plate at the Brewster angle to suppress internal reflections and is sent to
either a CCD camera for time-integrated imaging or to the 2 psec resolution streak
camera. The beam charge after collimation by the slit aperture is recorded on the Faraday
cup following the anode, FC2. For measuring x′, the beam is allowed to drift from the
initial waist to the anode. The divergence is calculated from the width of a Gaussian fit to
the profile along the slit, and the drift length from the initial waist (the error in the waist
mrad at 14 nC and decreases linearly to 15.5 mrad at 7 nC, yielding n ≅ = 149 and
130 mm-mrad and initial i =1.52 and 1.74 cm, for high and low charge, respectively.
These emittance values also agree with upstream pepper-pot measurements. Note that
the input beam -function is slightly mismatched in these cases to the ion focusing
eq = 1.25 cm.
The input bunch length is measured by refocusing the beam on the anode, with the
Cerenkov light analyzed with a Hamamatsu C1587 streak camera, giving a pulse length
of 25± 3 psec FWHM. Interestingly, the bunch length was nearly constant over a wide
range in Q . Given the beam distribution, the measurement method used may have
After the beam is collimated, the transmitted charge Qtrans is recorded on the
117
downstream Faraday cup FC2, and the value multiplied by a factor of 1.25 to correct for
the charge scraped by the anode wall after multiple scattering in the 130 µm thick Cu exit
foil and quartz plate. With plasma focusing, the fraction of the initial charge transmitted
through the slit, = Qtrans / Q, serves as an independent measure of the beam radius.
With the plasma on, the time-integrated Cerenkov profile shown in Fig. 38 displays
a narrow, intense peak as a result of ion focusing. The x -projected FWHM in this case is
0.9 mm, 40% broader than at the plasma start, but consistent with the beam head spreading
predicted by simulations. The projected peak intensity is ten times greater than in the no
plasma case, and is accompanied by a reduction in intensity at large x , away from the
peak. As the beam transverse centroid jitter is not small compared to the slit aperture, a
large shot-to-shot spread in due to increased scraping appears. To select only shots
centered on the slit, a shot is rejected if its y -peak (defined by the 0.8-maximum points)
is within 100 µm of one, but not both, apertures. This selection rejects images in which
the scraping is mainly on one side but does not reject a beam wide enough to scrape on
both sides. Values of selected in this way for an initially matched ( z0 = 0 ) case are
displayed in Fig. 3, along with the results of simulations. Varying the value of x′ in the
simulations within expected errors produces values 3% higher and 7% lower than
nominal; even so, the measured includes points falling far below this range, especially
for lower Q .
The spread in the data of Figure 39 is notably large, with events extending as low as
the no-plasma case. The low shots did not appear to be transversely wider than the rest,
as would happen if the lack of transmission were due to diminished beam focusing. The
data in these shots stayed well away from either collimator edge, having transverse
dimensions even smaller that the rest of the data for the shots with the lowest . The data
for these shots shared another aspect with the high-n shots, that of having less signal at
118
large x than in the plasma off case. This is an indication that the large initial beam
the effect of the plasma. One explanation for this data is that the peak observed is not the
primary peak, but is the result of irregular initial conditions which allow a satellite beam
to break away from the main beam. Another possibility involves the focusing properties
of a transversely non-symmetric beam, a topic that is presently not fully understood and
requires further study using three-dimensional simulations. Finally, the AWA accelerator
has been observed to operate in a mode where electron emission from the gun persists for
several RF buckets, a phenomenon termed explosive mode emission [62]. While this is
ordinarily associated with much higher-Q operation, the existence of multiple pulses
would mean that one of these pulses can act as the main pulse with the present diagnostics.
None of the above possibilities offer a particularly satisfactory explanation for the observed
phenomena. In any case, it can be stated that a large ensures a vertically well slit-centered
The simulation results given in Fig. 39 use the plasma fluid code NOVO[32],
Chapter 3. Results of this code have been benchmarked against the electromagnetic
particle-in-cell (PIC) code for the conditions in this experiment; the calculation of is
nearly identical (smaller in NOVO by 4%), and so NOVO was used in this analysis
because of its speed. The calculations use 8000 beam particles, initialized to a thermal
streak camera images which, however, contain information only about longitudinal and
Adequate beam symmetry and vertical centering in the slit were insured in these
119
measurements by requiring ≥ 0.45. A streak image satisfying this test is shown in Fig.
4, a false color image of the distribution nb ( x, y = 0,t ) . The predicted flaring of the beam
head can be observed in this image. No streak image of the plasma-off case is shown,
since beam expansion causes the intensity to drop below useful levels.
Each image that was analyzed further was sliced into short (5.7 psec) t-slices; for
every t-slice the integrated (in x) intensity, as well as the beam width, defined as the
region containing half the integrated intensity (−x1/2 ≤ x ≤ x1/2 ), were determined. As
the streak images at this resolution are inherently noisy, the results of this analysis for 10
images within a narrow charge window (10.2 < Q <11.8 nC) were summed to produce a
composite picture of the beam distribution. This is shown in Fig. 40, along with the rms
error bars and PIC simulation results, analyzed to give beam width as a function of
t-slice. The experimental data and PIC simulations display a profile flared at the beam
head due to radial expansion, as well as a beam core which is nearly matched and slightly
larger, r ≅ 370 m , due to adiabatic anti-damping of the emittance, than at input. The
simulation's agreement with the data is quite good, with a notable deviation in that the
experimental results generally show less pronounced beam-head expansion, except for
one leading simulation point — this value of x1/2 is obtained from very few beam
larger expansion in the simulated beam-head behavior may be due to the assumption of
an input beam with a thermal transverse phase space. This is not accurate for photoinjector
beams, where the emittance of a t-slice is smaller than that of the full beam, with much of
the total emittance arising from a correlation between t and orientation of transverse
phase space[63]. We note finally that the time-resolved measurements show no significant
The above data was taken with beams nearly matched to the focusing channel
120
strength. In order to explore dynamics of mismatched beams further, data runs were taken
with the input beam focused to a waist 2.5 cm upstream of the plasma column start, so
that it was strongly mismatched in both and d / dz . This was partly tried as a test for
system performance under less than optimal conditions. This case, with n0 unchanged,
displayed a smaller spread in than seen in Fig. 39, with values ranging from .27 to .59;
the average was =.42 +/-.01 (with plasma-off, =0.1), while simulation results were in
the range of =.45 to .52. Further, for these mismatched beams was observed for
several different values of n0 , a test which serves to distinguish the difference between
the case nb < n0 , where the focusing has negligibly weak dependence on n0 , and the case
nb > n0 , where the envelope oscillations proceed at twice the ion-channel betatron frequency,
as a function of n0 in Fig. 41: peak, 80th percentile, and mean. All of these quantities are
advance k env Lp gives a local minimum beam size at the plasma exit. This sensitivity is a
have been observed, through integrated and time-dependent imaging, as well as collimator
transmission, to self-guide in an underdense plasma for lengths many times the initial .
body and trumpet-shaped head predicted by simulations and analysis. The simulations are
in quantitative agreement with the beam sizes and transmissions obtained for symmetric
beams in the experiment, with the observed deviations likely arising from the approximate
nature of the beam simulation model. The simulation results predict stable beam guiding
which continues over longer distances, as must be the case for their effective use as
underdense PWFA drivers. These results also point to a problem which must be addressed
121
in future PWFA work: stabilizing the transverse beam centroid and distribution shape.
This will be accomplished through advances in laser (e.g. spatial filtering) and photocathode
(e.g. high quantum efficiency, uniform emitter such as Cs 2Te) technology. Additionally,
Figure 37. Cerenkov streak image showing nb ( x,t) , with earlier times (beam head) on
top.
122
140
plasma on
120 plasma off
Projected intensity
100
80
60
40
20
0
0.0 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.0
Transverse position (cm)
Figure 38. Transverse beam profile after collimation, from digitized CCD camera image
of Cerenkov light.
123
0.8
plasma on
0.7 simulation
0.6 plasma off
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Qi (nC)
Figure 39. Transmission data and simulations for an initially nearly -matched case.
124
1.4 100
x1 / 2 exp. intensity exp.
0.8 60
1/2
0.6
40
x
0.4
20
0.2
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (ps)
Figure 40. Time-slice dependence of beam intensity and half-widths, form experiment
(exp.) and PIC simulation (sim.).
125
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
peak
0.2 th
80 percentile
0.1 mean
0
1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40
13 -3
n (10 cm )
o
126
Chapter 7. Electron Acceleration Measurements in a
Nonlinear Plasma Wake-field
The goal of the experimental program at Argonne has been to demonstrate the
highest plasma wake-field that can be driven with this electron source, originally aiming
at a number exceeding 100 MeV/m. The ability to generate a drive/witness beam has
added a second priority, that of demonstrating effective acceleration and transport of the
witness beam in the nonlinear wake-field. This is usually trivial in the case microwave
cavities, with iris dimensions of order centimeters. In a plasma experiment, the witness
beam must be placed in a < 200 µm diameter and < 3mm long volume in order to
effectively trap and accelerate in the wake-field. At the time of this writing the demonstration
of high gradient is only partially complete. The second goal has seen the development of
the necessary techniques and hardware, but has not yet been attempted. This chapter will
detail the equipment and experimental strategy developed for both of these goals, and
The first attempt at measuring the strength of the wake-field using the present
equipment was reported in [64], with the conclusion that the wake-field from a 16 nC
drive beam had a magnitude of at least 4.1 MeV/m. These data were difficult to interpret
because the measured energy increase was smaller than the overall energy spread of the
drive beam, and comparable to the energy jitter. The experience gained in the course of
this work suggested that the measurements would be facilitated by improvements in the
energy measurement system, better understanding and instrumentation of the drive beam
transverse dynamics (the topic of the previous chapter), improvements in drive bunch
characteristics, and a better understanding of drive beam fluctuations. The last point, the
stability of the drive beam, has required advances on two fronts: a search for an accelerator
127
operating point which affords greater stability and the development of beam measurement
The first topic discussed is the development of the revised spectrometer system.
The latest data taken with this equipment is much more revealing than the earlier (1995)
experiment, so only the more recent results are discussed. This experiment was performed
without the benefit of a witness beam, but instead relied a measurement of the drive beam
self-modulated energy spread to infer the peak wake-field strength. The rest of the Chapter
presents a more detailed view of the future direction of this experiment, including the
After interacting with the plasma, the drive beam acquires a very large energy
spread, up to 100% in some simulated cases, while also expanding very quickly in size.
The large shot to shot fluctuations in the photoinjector make it desirable to capture as
much data as possible for every single shot. To this end, it is necessary to simultaneously
observe both the accelerated and decelerated electrons even at the highest projected beam
energy modulation. A second factor driving the spectrometer design is the beam expansion
after exiting the plasma column, which is comparable to, but can exceed the initial
angular spread required to match the beam into the plasma. For the focusing experiment
the initial beam convergence was 18 mrad, which may increase toward the end because
of imperfect matching and the fact that the beam is decelerating. If the size of this
expanding beam is not quickly brought under control, it would force the use of very wide
apertures in the spectrometer in order to avoid beam scraping (loss of signal) or scattering
off the walls (signal showing up at the wrong energy). Additionally, the spectrometer
design was to allow for sufficiently good resolution throughout the energy range, and the
128
ability to tolerate beam initial conditions that don’t necessarily correspond to those
The final configuration of this system is depicted in Fig. 42, including the slit
collimator at the plasma anode, a defocusing in the bend plane quadrupole, followed by
the bend magnet and phosphor screen. The slit collimator is the same as was used in the
focusing experiment, but serves a dual purpose in the present context. Initial collimation
types. In this case, it eliminates the possibility of initial position jitter altering the measured
energy. The collimator also retains its original function as a diagnostic of the quality of
focusing and self-guiding of the drive beam, with an ICT to record the outgoing charge.
In should be noted that collimating the beam in this way amounts to selecting only a
the energy spectrum of the entire beam. The results obtained in this way are intended to
advantage of the approach is that the rejected particles mainly belong to the beam head,
where the change from the original energy is very small. This improves the signal to
noise ratio for the particles emerging at the highest energies, which may be relatively few
in number. The remainder of the magnetic components in the system are designed to
minimize the -function in the bend plane over a large energy range without having to
readjust magnet strengths. This means that a monoenergetic beam will be imaged point-
The performance of this system was evaluated with a realistic electron distribution
using a FORTRAN program, importing the particle phase space from a beam-plasma
simulation as the input. The particle trajectories are then tracked in space, under the
influence of the magnetic fields as measured by a hall probe. Figure 43 shows a random
129
subset of these trajectories in relation to other objects in the system. The program calculates
the intersection of the particle trajectories and the screen area, recording all the data about
the particle at time of intersection. The sum of these records is displayed in Figure 44 to
reveal the energy resolution of the system. This plot shows a much better resolution at
high energies than at the lower end of the spectrum. Effective measurement of these
accelerated particles, which may be few in number under actual experimental conditions,
requires that they are focused in y at the screen, as shown in Figure 45 using the same
data.
Figure 42. The spectrometer system, including the slit at the plasma anode, quadrupole,
130
Figure 43. A simulation of trajectories in the spectrometer.
131
Figure 44. The final position of a particle vs. . The resolution at high energy is designed
to be better than for lower energies.
132
Figure 45. A simulated view of the spectrometer screen showing a y -focus for high
energy particles.
Improvements to the AWA linac prior to these results include the conditioning of
the drive gun cavity to sustain a higher gradient and an enlargement of the laser spot on
the cathode. This resulted in an obvious reduction in the bunch length available from the
machine, but also a change in the longitudinal profile, with the bunches exhibiting a long
tail in the trailing end of the beam. These tails were long enough, in fact, to allow
self-modulation of the beam energy in the plasma to probe the maximum generated
acceleration gradient. This was confirmed on the first try (using still the old spectrometer),
suggesting that by observing this self-modulation effect, changes could be made to the
AWA parameters, the focusing solenoid and the plasma density, in order to optimize the
wake-field performance.
133
The experimental setup used for these runs is essentially a combination of the
focusing experiment beam line with the energy measurement system. The setup uses two
ICT’s intended for computing the fraction of the transmitted charge in real time, as was
done using the Faraday cup beam dump in the focusing experiment. In this way, the shots
for which the drive beam was insufficiently focused or at the wrong transverse displacement
When directing the AWA drive beam into the plasma chamber, it was immediately
apparent that the presence of plasma had the effect of greatly increasing the total energy
spread of the beam. These wider spectra were characterized by a large electron population
at lower energies and sometimes a faint high energy tail. Not all of the shots displayed
these features, with the total amount of energy spread greatly varying from shot to shot.
The energy spread also tended to become wider with increased plasma density. It also
When attempting to optimize the system for the highest generated wake-field, it
became apparent that changing the linac settings would be constrained by having to keep
the initial energy spread below some nominal value. Certain settings for the gun launch
phase also had the effect of causing excessive energy jitter. Both of these effects are
undesirable in the task of proving that the accelerated electrons actually had a much
lower energy at the start of the plasma. With this parameter search, it was not always
further gains seemed to become more difficult, a data set was recorded at a plasma
density in the region of 1.5 − 2 × 1013 and ICT2 registering as much as 15 nC. The initial
charge was, therefore, in the range of 25-30 nC. Since the shots with large energy spreads
were infrequent, occurring only about 25% of the time, only these shots’ spectrometer
images were saved. Fig. 46 shows two examples where it is apparent that even within this
134
set of ‘good’ shots there is a large amount of fluctuations. Fig. 46 a) shows a large
deceleration gradient with a high energy tail that seems to be at a different y -position
than the rest of the beam. This would be true if a plasma transverse deflection mode is
excited, and the beam tail is kicked sideways. The no-plasma background, shown in Fig.
46 c) shows that the initial energy spread is much smaller than the plasma wake-field
Figure 47 displays a feature found in only one of the saved images, and not
discovered until the data analysis, and then only by changing the color map to enable
very faint features to stand out. This image shows a high energy tail in which the
transverse kick is small. It also extends to very high energy, or 2.6 MeV higher than the
mean. Over the 12 cm interaction length, this implies an average gradient of 22 MeV/m.
The energy gain is approximately twice as large as the maximum energy loss for this
shot. This ratio can be directly compared to the transformer ratio from 2-D simulations,
thus validating the prediction that the transformer ratio can be as high as 2.0 for roughly
symmetric in time bunches. It should also be stated that many conditions can lead to an
or an absence of particles at the correct phase. This can be used to explain the high
The scarcity of images showing the highest energy accelerated electrons may also
have implications for the relative difficulty of future experiments aimed at witness beam
charge preservation. In this case, the drive beam must create a stable accelerating bucket
while at the same time the witness beam is present at the correct location to be captured
into it. Such capture must happen in the absence of 2-D effects such as phase changes,
and any 3-D effects which may also change the shape of the accelerator bucket.
135
a)
b)
c)
Figure 46. Images of the energy spectrom taken at spectrometer focal plane. Image c) is a
no-plasma background.
136
Figure 47. Spectrometer phosphor image with the gray scale adjusted to accentuate the
high energy tail. The initial energy is 13.8 MeV, with an rms energy spread of 140 KeV
and an energy jitter of 92 KeV.
The results quoted above leave some room for improvement in terms of what can
ultimately be expected from the present laboratory setup. Future results can benefit from
increased stability on the part of the electron beam as well as a more complete set of
measurements of the bunch initial conditions. These experiments will hopefully reveal an
even higher maximum acceleration gradient, and also address the question of what is the
best way to accomplish the witness beam charge preservation experiment. The plans for
The results presented in the last section show the presence of a plasma wave
capable of accelerating electrons with a 22 MeV/m gradient. With more work, it may be
possible to improve this number, but certainly not by an order of magnitude, in the range
137
predicted by the earlier PARMELA simulations. Apart from seeking record-breaking
gradients, the results can greatly be improved by strengthening the connection between
the beam and plasma initial conditions and the observed energy modulation. To this end,
it will be very beneficial to achieve linac conditions having a greater amount of shot-to-shot
repeatability.
Perhaps the most difficult to account fluctuation, partly because it is not measured
on a shot-by-shot basis, is that of the bunch longitudinal profile. While it may not be
possible to achieve vastly better control over this parameter, it is possible to improve the
measurement of the average bunch length of a large number of shots. The focusing
experiment (Chapter 6) suggested that slice emittance considerations may play a role the
measurement being an underestimate. This could be tolerated for the focusing data because
of the weak dependence of the result on z . Slice emittance effects can be eliminated
from the bunch length measurement by first scattering the beam with a foil. The drift
length from the foil to the Cerenkov emitter will serve to wash out the slice emittance
effects.
quality trailing beam matched into the plasma at the correct phase will become radially
confined and accelerated. An experiment that demonstrates this would represent a big
step in showing that such a plasma based device is capable of behaving like a true
accelerator. The most difficult aspect of such an experiment is that it depends on having
two electron beams, each of which must separately be focused onto the same point in
space but appropriately separated in time. Two possible ways of creating such a drive/trailing
beam pair include forming them in separate electrons sources, or creating them in the
138
same photocathode cavity. In the former case, the two beams will be well-distinguished
in energy, enabling a more accurate energy analysis, but the independent jitter from two
electron sources will make it harder to consistently focus both beams to the same spot. A
trailing beam created in the same cavity as the drive beam will experience very similar
conditions during propagation down the beamline. This hopefully means that, although
the drive beam will have some position jitter, the trailing beam will follow it. Disadvantages
of this approach include the inability to introduce steering corrections on the trailing
beam alone, and a greater difficulty in distinguishing the two beams in the downstream
energy measurements.
Each of the two methods of generating and focusing a witness beam into the
plasma chamber were tried in the laboratory for the purpose of determining their relative
merits. When the ~4.5 MeV witness beam encounters the matching solenoid, it can be
focused at a very low value for the magnet current. As the current is increased from that
point, the beam increases in size. At even higher settings, it decreases in size again. This
is the second focus, corresponding to a beam envelope that has a tight focus near the
center of the solenoid, and becomes large but converging near the end of the solenoid to
come to another focus inside the plasma chamber. The first focus was observed at a
relative solenoid setting of 370, while the second focus was at 2080, or slightly higher
than 200 Amps. When compared to a setting of 1800 needed to place the drive beam
waist at the same location, these results indicate that the witness beam energy is was too
high to achieve similar focal properties for both beams. The solution is to energy-tune the
solenoid focal length by decreasing the RF power to the witness gun. Throughout this
test, the focused beam was observed to fluctuate in position over distances comparable to
the spot diameter. This fact suggests that, given the additional (and independent) drive
beam fluctuations, the overlap between the two beams will certainly not be perfect for
139
every shot. This test was conducted using only the witness beam, without attempting to
also direct the drive beam into the plasma chamber. Co-propagating both beams has the
additional problem that it may not be possible to diagnose the focal spot of the ~500 pC
witness beam in the presence of a 25 nC drive beam. Thus, it may be very difficult to take
account of the drive beam space-charge forces acting on the witness beam, especially
near the combiner dipole (see Fig 20) where the two beams are displaced off-axis. At
very small delays, there forces are enough to steer the witness beam completely away, an
effect which will also vary as a function of the drive beam charge fluctuations. In the face
of these difficulties, it was decided not to pursue the use of the low energy witness beam
In order to adopt the method of generating a witness beam in the same cavity as
the drive beam, as covered in Chapter 5, several changes to the hardware were required.
The old coaxial mirrors scheme to generate the witness beam had the disadvantage that
the witness beam charge could fluctuate independently of the drive beam, as would
happen if there is a laser hot spot within the area directed toward the witness beam
mirror. As the two resulting electron beams propagate in the same beamline, there is no
way to measure the charge of the witness beam after creation. A new beam splitter in
which divides the laser beam according to a fixed energy ratio is shown in Figure 48. A
quartz optical wedge is mounted at 45 degrees to the beam direction and inclined half-way
between S and P polarization. This creates a reflection from the forward edge of
approximately 5% of the power; the reflection form the backward edge is easily discarded
because it is at the wrong angle. The main beam loses 20% of its energy in two passes
through the beam splitter. In order for the two laser beams to have a similar power
density at the cathode, this device uses a telescope to reduce the trailing laser beam spot
by a factor of three. The last trailing beam mirror is attached to a remotely actuatable
140
mount to allow some steering for the trailing electron beam. Since the point of zero delay
is very difficult to deduce from the geometry of this device, it was calibrated with the
streak camera. An added advantage of this device over the older technique is the ability to
place the second beam ahead of the primary beam. This feature can be used to make a
The first test of the new beam splitter to generate electrons produced 1 nC for the
trailing beam at a drive beam charge of 20 nC, verifying the design 5% power split.
Focusing both beams separately into the plasma chamber resulted in a witness beam with
a transverse spot smaller than the drive. However, its position on the OTR mirror used to
perform the spot size analysis was seen to change as a function of the delay, with the two
beams overlapping at zero delay. The most likely reason for this is the change in beam
energy as a function of gun cavity launch phase, combined with a slightly off-axis
trajectory in the solenoid. Better solenoid alignment, as well as use of the remote actuator
used to adjust the transverse displacement of the trailing beam on the cathode ought to
Attempts to measure the bunch length of the trailing beam proved to be unreliable
due to a lack of signal. The bunch length seemed to be close to 20 psec FWHM, a large
amount of beam lengthening for a 1 nC beam. In order for the trailing beam to be
contained in an accelerating phase of the wave, its overall length must be shorter than
about 10 psec. The observed bunch lengthening may be caused by hot spots in the laser
beam, possibly resulting from aberrations caused by the telescope. Such aberrations can
result from the laser crossing the lenses off-axis and at a finite incidence angle. Although
this alignment has been done very carefully, it may not yet be perfect.
141
Figure 48. The laser splitter used to control the delay between the drive and witness
beams.
Except for the excessive bunch lengthening, it appear that the remainder of the
drive/trailing beam initial conditions are satisfactory in terms of being able to capture the
trailing beam into the plasma wave. Given that the remaining problems can be solved, the
next challenge will be to show radial confinement and acceleration for the trailing beam.
A reasonable question to ask a this point is, even if the trailing beam is at the
proper delay and its volume is small enough to effectively be guided by the plasma, how
can this fact be demonstrated in the laboratory? One problem with this may be that the
trailing beam’s spectrometer signal will blend with that of the drive beam’s tail. It is
difficult to understand what set of conditions are responsible for the creation of this tail,
which may approach the actual trailing beam in brighness on the spectrometer screen.
One possible solution for this is the use of slightly different initial conditions for the
trailing beam. Through careful control of the trailing beam emission center on the
142
photocathode (this is under remote control, by deflecting the laser), the trailing beam will
hopefully arrive at the plasma with some transverse momentum. Upon capture in the ion
channel, the bunch centroid orbit will oscillate about the drive beam axis and exit the
plasma with a different, but hopefully finite transverse component. The witness beam will
thus show up at a different place in the non-bend direction of the spectrometer screen;
this may happen quite naturally, even without a deliberate attempt to control its initial
conditions. After successfully differentiating the witness beam from the drive beam tail
electrons in this way, the surviving witness charge can be obtained by image processing
techniques. This measurement can be compared to the witness beam charge incident on
143
APPENDIX A. The Control and Data Taking System
Software capable of performing online data analysis can greatly facilitate an
experimental effort. Observing a phosphor screen beam image over time gives very little
information; plotting the beam width against the magnet setting tells a very different tale.
The same sentiment can be expressed about displaying histograms, temporal trends,
curve fits, performing image analysis, and applying a filter function to reject certain data.
large shot-to-shot fluctuations present in these systems, and the necessity, due to cost
Because of the large number of analysis functions that can be employed, a danger
exists in adopting a software package with too much functionality. If a great deal of
implemented, or the setup effort will compete for attention with the actual experiment.
As with any amount of programming, there is also the possibility of making an error. A
desirable feature of such a system, therefore, is the ability to configure as many of the
measurements as is practical through the graphical user interface (GUI). This approach
can never be made universal, and so a certain amount of programming is always necessary.
The best approach for this programming is to develop a well-structured subroutine library,
Hardware
major components making up the system hardware. This system has evolved through a
series of equipment updates, and also through some trial and error. At the heart of the
144
system is a Macintosh 7300 computer, closely coupled to the 8-bit video frame grabber
expansion board, model LG-3 from Scion Corp., through the internal PCI bus. A second
expansion card is used for communication to GPIB instruments, such as digital oscilloscopes
and the CAMAC chassis, which houses additional ADC and DAC expansion cards. From
the hardware point of view, all data for a given shot can be collected at a 30 Hz rate, with
Instruments has been used throughout this project. The LabView package includes a
an environment to define a user interface, and a data acquisition interface library. From
the computer language point of view, this approach has several advantages over writing
the entire control system in C, listed here for the benefit of anyone contemplating the use
1) LabView uses call-by-value. There are time penalties for passing large
2) Surprisingly, the same time penalties exist for accessing global data.
145
3) LabView is proprietary, unstandardized, and not fully documented.
5) Despite the best intensions of the programmer, the wiring diagram (this
contains the code) can become cluttered and difficult to understand. It is this aspect
A number of the advantages align with the notion stated earlier, that when a new measurement
requires a programming change, the method for making this change must be straightforward
Also used in this system is the IMAQ library (by National Instruments) for LabView,
containing a set of general purpose image processing routines, compatible with the Graftek
Taking a que from the existing large scale packages for accelerator control, such
as EPIX and Vsystem, it is an advantage if the software can stores machine settings and
measured values in the form of a database. Use of a database structure enables the use of
sophisticated search techniques, allowing the results to be displayed as the data is taken.
In fact, the data filters defined in the CERNLIB package, a set of off-line data analysis
tools for the high energy community represent one such type of search. In CERNLIB, the
Some of the ideas about how to structure the control system software came from
the documentation for EPIX, a control system package popular with large accelerator
Inc. These systems include a real-time database, to store and process the data streaming
146
in from the experiment. Further motivation came from the CERNLIB documentation, an
analysis package written for for high energy physics community. One capability within
CERNLIB is for the user to write a filter function acting on the data which can select a
subset of all the events processed, called an N-tuple. These N-tuples can then be handled
The desired functionality for the plasma experiment software was, then, a system
having a database structure similar to EPIX, but with the capability of selecting subsets
and sub-subsets of data, like in CERNLIB, with the distinction that as much of this
The sources of data in the system are the video frame grabber board and the
ADC's. The image data is first processed, and one or more features are extracted. The
reduced data, along with the ADC data is stored into the database; each piece of data, and
hence database column, has a unique string identifier. The next step is to compute
intermediate and final results from the existing columns in the database. A special type of
intermediate result is a column which accepts a 1 or 0 value, a 1 signifying that the shot
in question belongs to a particular subset (as in the N-tuples of CernLib). This prescription
for creating a subset relies on preparing custom code for every new case. A simpler, but
more general approach, is to define subsets based on a set of limits for any given column.
Figure 99 shows the VI for setting these limits by dragging the mouse while viewing a
chart displaying the history of the variable in question. These limits can also be set evenly
After the data and results are stored in the database, it can either be saved, along
with the raw image data, or plotted in real time. The plotting function is driven by a
147
plot(var1,var2),lim2(var3),lim1:3(var4),var5=value,...
where varx is the string identifier for some column, limx:y(varz) includes only shots
whith varz inside limit bands x through y (or only inside x if ":y" is omitted). Similarly, an
entry of the form varx=value excludes shots where varx is not equal to value. Any
The control system also features several VI's for the setting of magnet currents.
The VI’s for this function are hidden most of the time, except when the magnet settings
need to be changed. Data taking is disabled during the time that the current is being
ramped to the new setting, and then entered into the database for reference during normal
operation.
Although never intended to be a replacement for saving the raw data on disk for
off-line analysis, the control system has been very useful for both making routine
measurement and spotting new trends during the experimental runs. One of the routine
measurements is of the focused spot size while changing the solenoid strength. This
creates a plot that is useful in determine the solenoid strength which places the beam
waist at the OTR screen. The space-charge forces in the linac modify the waist position
somewhat, and so the limits VI can select an active bunch charge range for this measurement.
Experience has shown this method of locating the waist to be very repeatable.
148
References
[1] T. Srinivasan-Rao, and J. Smedley, Table top, pulsed, relativistic electron gun with
GV/m gradient, in Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Advanced Accelerator
Concepts, Lake Tahoe, California, S. Cattopadhyay, editor, AIP (1996).
[2] E. Dodd, J. K. Kim, and D. Umstadter, “Ultrashort-pulse Relativistic Electron
Gun/Accelerator”, in Advanced Accelerator Concepts, Seventh Workshop (proceedings),
Lake Tahoe, CA 1996, S. Chattopadhyay, ed.
[3] T. Tajima and J. M. Dawson, “Laser electron accelerator”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 267
(1979).
[4] J. Simpson et al., Argonne National Laboratory report No. ANL-HEP-TR-89-81
(April, 1990).
[5] H. Braun, et al. “CLIC- A Compact and Efficient High Energy Linear Collider”, in
Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, p. 716.
[6] P. Chen, et al., “Acceleration of electrons by the interaction of a bunched electron
beam with a plasma”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 693 (1985).
[7] R. Keinigs and M. Jones, Physics of Fluids, 30, 252 (1987).
[8] J. B. Rosenzweig, et al. Plasma Wake Field Acceleration: A Proposed Experimental
Test, in Laser Acceleration of Particles (conference proceedings, Malibu), C. Joshi,
editor, AIP (1985).
[9] A. K. Berezin, et al., “Wake Field Excitation in Plasma by a Relativistic Electron
Pulse with a Controlled Number of Short Bunches,” Fizika Plasmy, 20 663 (1994), also,
Plasma Phys. Rep. 20 596 (1994).
[10] J. B. Rosenzweig, et al. Experimental Observation of Plasma Wake-Field Acceleration,
Physical Review Letters 61, 98 (1988).
[11] J. B. Rosenzweig et al. Experimental Measurement of Nonlinear Plasma Wake
Fields, Phys. Rev. A 39, 1586 (1989).
[12] K. Nakajima, et al. Plasma Wake-field Accelerator Experiment at KEK, NIM-A 292,
12, (1990).
[13] H. Nakanishi, et al. Wakefield Accelerator Using Twon Linacs, NIM-A 328, 596
(1993).
[14] T. Katsouleas, et al. “A proposal for a 1 GeV Plasma-Wakefield Acceleration
Experiment at SLAC”, submitted to the Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator
Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
[15] S. C. Hartman, et al., “Initial Measurements of the UCLA RF Photoinjector,” NIM-A
340 219 (1994).
[16] J. Rosenzweig, et al. “Proposal for Staged Plasma Wake-field Accelerator Experiment
at the Fermilab Test Facility”, Fermilab proposal P890, 1996.
149
[17]B. E. Carlsten, et al. “Subpicosecond, Ultra-bright Electron Injector”, ‘95 PAC.
[18] K. V. Lotov, “Simulation of Ultrarelativistic Beam Dynamics in Plasma Wake-field
Accelerator”, in Phys. Fluids 5, Iss. 3, 785 (1998).
[19] J. B. Rosenzweig, B. Breizman, T. Katsouleas, and J. J. Su, “Acceleration and
focusing of electrons in two-dimensional nonlinear plasma wake fields”, Phys. Rev. A
44, 6189 (1991).
[20] W. E. Martin, G. J. Caporaso, W. M Fawley, D. Prosintz, and A. G. Cole, Phys. Ref.
Lett. 54, 685 (1985).
[21] K. Takayama and S. Hiramatsu, Phys. Rev. A 37, 173 (1988).
[22] W. K. H. Panofsky and W. A. Wenzel, “Some considerations concerning the transverse
deflection of charged particles in radio-frequency fields”, Rev. Sci. Instr. 27 967 (1956).
[23] T. Katsouleas, S. Wilks, P. Chen, J. M. Dawson, and J. J. Su, “Beam Loading in
Plasma Accelerators”, Particle Accelerators 22, 81 (1987).
[24] D. H. Whittum, et al., “Electron-hose instbility in the ion-focused regime”, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 67, 991 (1991).
[25] J. Krall and G. Joyce, “Transverse equilibrium and stability of the primary beam in
the plasma wake-field accelerator”, Phys. Plasmas 2 1326 (1995).
[26] E. Esarey, P. Sprangle, J. Krall, A. Ting, Review of plasma-based accelerator concepts,
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 24 (2) 252 (1996).
[27] B. W. Montague and W. Schnell, “Multiple scattering and synchrotron radiation in
the plasma beat-wave accelerator”, in Laser Acceleration of Particles (conference
proceedings, Malibu), C. Joshi, editor, AIP 1985.
[28] K. Yokoya, Quantum Correction to Beamstrahlung due to the Finite Number of
Photons, NIM A 251 1 (1986).
[29] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, p. 643.
[30] H. L. Buchanan, Electron Beam Propagation in the Ion-focusied Regime, Phys.
Fluids 30 (1) 221 (1987).
[31] T. Katsouleas, et al., “A Proposal for a 1 GeV Plasma-Wakefield Acceleration
Experiment at SLAC”, submitted to Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Particle Accelerator
Conference.
[32] B. N. Breizman, T. Tajima, D. L. Fisher and P. Z. Chebotaev, “Excitation of nonlinear
wake field in a plasma for particle acceleration”, in Coherent radiation generation and
particle acceleration, A Prokhorov, editor, AIP Press, New York, p. 263 (1992).
[33] C. K. Birdsall and A. B. Langdon, Plasma physics via computer simulation, McGraw-
Hill 1985.
[34] W. H. Press, et al., Numerical Recipes in Fortran, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.
150
[35] W. Mori, private communication.
[36] J. Krall, K. Nguyen, and G. Joyce, Numerical Simulations of Axisymmetric Erosion
Processes in Ion-Focused Regime-Transported Beams, Phys. Fluids B 1, 2099 (1989).
[37] J. B. Rosenzweig, et al., Demonstration of electron beam self-focusing in plasma
wake fields, Phys. Fluids B, 2 1376 (1990).
[38] N. Barov and J. B. Rosenzweig, “Propagation of Short Electron Pulses in Underdense
Plasmas”, Phys. Rev. E, 49 4407 (1994).
[39] W. H. Bennett, Self-Focusing Streams, Physical Review 98, 1584 (1955).
[40] J. B. Rosenzweig, et al., Demonstration of electron beam self-focusing in plasma
wake fields, Phys. Fluids B 2 1376 (1990).
[41] Handbook of Mathematical Functions, edited by M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun
(Dover, New York, 1972), P. 721.
[42] W. Gai, Private communication.
[43] J. Rosenzweig, N. Barov, E. Colby, P. Colestock, “A Linear Collider Based on
Nonlinear Plasma Wake-field Acceleration”, in proceedings of Snowmass ‘96.
[44] P. Schoessow, et al., The Argonne Wakefield Accelerator, in Proceedings of the 2nd
European Particle Accelerator Conference, Nice, June 1990.
[45] L. Serafini and C. Pagani, Proc. 1st ePAC, Rome, June 1988, Ed. World Scientific, p.
866.
[46] E. Colby , et al.,”Design and Construction of High Brightness RF Photoinjectors for
TESLA”, in Proceedings of the 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference, vol. 2, p. 967,
IEEE.
[47] E. Colby, Private comminication.
[48] C.-H. Ho, A High Current, Short Pulse Electron Source for Wakefield accelerators,
Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. California Los Angeles, 1992.
[49] K.-J. Kim, “RF and space-charge effects in laser-driven RF electron guns”, NIM A
275 201 (1989).
[50] B. E. Carlsten, et al., NIM A 285, 313 (1989).
[51] E. Colby, et al. Design and Construction of High Brightness RF Photoinjectors for
TESLA, in Proceedings of the 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference, vol. 2, p. 967,
IEEE.
[52] Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-96-1834, 1997.
[53] W. Leemans, “Electron beam Monitoring at High Frequencies and Ultra-fast Time
Scales”, in Advanced Accelerator Concepts, Seventh Workshop, 1996, page 23, S.
Chattopadhyay, ed.
151
[54] K. B. Unser, “Design and Preliminary Test of a Beam Intensity Monitor ofr LEP”, in
Proceedings of the 1989 IEEE Particled Accelerator Conference, Vol. 1, page 71.
[55] Y. Yamazaki, T. Kurihara, H. Kobayashi, A. Asami, NIM A, 322, 139 (1992).
[56] J. B. Rosenzweig and G. Travish, “Design Considerations for the UCLA PBPL
Slit-based Phase Space Measurement Systems”, PBPL internal note, Feb. 21, 1994.
[57] M. E. Conde, et al. “Generation and Acceleration of Hich Charge Short Electron
Bunches”, submitted to NIM.
[58] Y. H. Chin, CERN LEP-TH/88-3 1988.
[59]H. Nakanishi, et al,. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 177 (1991).
[60] G. Hairapetian, et al,. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1244 (1994).
[61] J.-L. Delcroix, and A. R. Trindade, Hollow cathode arcs, in Advances in Electronics
and Electron Physics, Vol. 35, L. Marton, editor, Academic Press (1974).
[62] P. Schoessow et al., The Argonne Wakefield Accelerator High Current Photocathode
Gun and Drive Linac, .in Proceedings of the 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference,
IEEE.
[63] X. Qiu et al., Physical Review Letters 76, 3723 (1996).
[64] N. Barov, et al. Measurements of plasma wake-fields in the blow-out regime, in
Proceedings of the 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference, vol. 1, p. 631, IEEE.
152