87 views

Uploaded by NanaNaurah95

turbulent boundary layer

- Jacobs - Design of Slurry Transport Systems
- Viscous Flow
- 1Natural_convectionPaul
- jeas_0514_1082
- 67.IJMPERDFEB201867
- J.turbomachinery.2009.Vol.131.N4
- MKM99
- P5PaperCIL0063
- Exercise 2B
- Metadc304192 Muy Bueno Este Tobera
- Fluid Mechanics 2
- • Internal Flows Continued
- wake flow
- A Final Report
- J.fluids.engineering.2009.Vol.131.N6
- Dimples
- Report Final (1)
- eucass1p237.pdf
- Minimum Fluidization Velocity_2.pdf
- lab3.doc

You are on page 1of 9

Like the flow in a pipe, the flow in a boundary layer can be laminar or

turbulent. In a pipe the transition takes place at a Reynolds Number of about 2000,

although it may be delayed to higher Reynolds numbers by extreme care to avoid

pipe roughness or vibration. In a constant-diameter pipe the flow has the same

character over the entire length of the flow, except for a small region near the

entrance. The same is not true of a boundary-layer flow. In a boundary-layer flow the

characteristics dimension is the distance from leading edge. The appropriate

Reynolds number for boundary-layer calculation is based on this length. For a flat

plate, the transition takes place in the Reynolds number region from 3.5 x 10 5 to 2.8

x 106. This transition is strongly influenced by turbulence in the stream outsides the

boundary layer and by roughness by the surface. A typical boundary layer on a

smooth surface of sufficient length might look like Figure 5. The figure shows not

only laminar, transition, and turbulent boundary layer.

For laminar boundary layers, as for laminar flow in a pipe, it was possible to

calculate the flow behaviour from a set of plausible assumptions and them to show

experimentally that the flow behaved as calculated. For turbulent boundary layers, as

for turbulent flow in pipes, no one is yet able to calculate the flow behaviour without

starting with experimental data. However, from experimental measurements it has

been possible to make some generalizations, which can then be used to extrapolate

to other conditions.

In a turbulent flow the velocity at any point fluctuates randomly with time. Any

such velocity as consisting of a time-average component, V time

avg

, and fluctuating

V = Vtime, avg +

These are defined such that Vtime, avg is the average reading over some time interval of

a velocity meter at the point

Vtime,avg. =

1

t

V dt

0

Figure 5

And such that the average value of over some time interval is zero, because it is

positive and negative for equal parts of the total time. In all the following discussions

the velocities are the same time-average velocities, V avg.

Most of the results available for turbulent boundary layers have been found by

measuring time-average velocities at various points in flow in pipes or over flat plates

and by attempting to generalize the velocity profiles. For various experimental

reasons it is easier to make such measurements in pipes, so most of the results are

pipe results. We now consider the turbulent flow in pipes for one section and then

return to the turbulent boundary layer.

Turbulent Flow in Pipes.

Turbulent flow differs from laminar flow in that the principal cause of the shear

stresses between adjacent layers of the fluids is the interchange of masses of fluid

between adjacent layers of fluid moving at different velocities. This gives rise to

additional stresses, called Reynolds Stresses. The most dramatic effect of these

stresses is the large increase of friction heating in turbulent flow over that found in

laminar flow. The other dramatic effect is the change in the shape of the velocity

profile from laminar to turbulent flow. This is shown in Figure 6, where the

experimental turbulent velocity profiles measured by Nikuradse are compared with

the profile for laminar flow.

Figure 6

The velocity profile for laminar flow in a tube is parabolic. For turbulence flow

it is much closer to plug flow; that is to a uniform velocity over the entire pipe cross

section. Furthermore, as seen from Figure 6, as the Reynolds number is increased,

the velocity profile approaches closer and closer to plug flow. At the wall the turbulent

eddies disappear so the shear stress at the wall for both laminar and turbulent flow

of Newtonian fluids is given by o = (dVx / dy ). Although it is very difficult

experimentally to measure velocity gradients very close to the wall, it is clear from

Figure 6 that at the wall the velocity gradient is steeper for turbulence flow; hence the

shear stress and friction heating must be larger for turbulent flow that for laminar

flow.

Prandtl showed that each of the different turbulent-flow curves in Figure 6

could be represented fairly well by an equation of the form

Vx

V x ,centerline

r

r wall

(4.1)

For the curves shown in Figure 6 the value of n that gives the best representation of

the experimental curves varies from 1/6 for the lowest Reynolds number to 1/10 for

the highest Reynolds number. The best-fit values of n in Equation 1 for all the

experimental curves are shown in Table 3.

Prandtl selected 1/7 as the best average, deducing Prandtls 1/7 power

velocity distribution rule. This is not an exact rule, because if it were a general rule,

then all the curves in Figure 6 would be identical. Furthermore, it cannot be correct

very near the wall of the tube, because there it predicts that dV/dy is infinite and

hence that the shear stress is infinite. Nonetheless, it is widely used because it is

simple and gives useful results, as shown in Table 3.

It is possible to find more complex correlations for the velocity distribution in a

pipe that do not have the limitations of Prandtls 1/7 power rule. In Figure 6 we see

that the Reynolds number appears as a parameter in the velocity distribution plot. In

trying to produce a universal velocity distribution rule it seems logical to change the

coordinates in Figure 6 so that the Reynolds number enters either explicitly or

implicitly on one of the coordinates, in the hope of getting all the data onto one curve.

Reynolds number

Best-fit value of n

4.0 x 103

6.0

2.3 x 10

6.6

1.1 x 10

7.0

1.1 x 106

8.8

2.0 x 106

10

10

3.2 x 10

The most successful method of doing this been to define a new quantity called the

friction velocity, u*,

(Friction velocity) = u* =

wall

1 /2

( )

f

= v x ,avg 2

1 /2

()

(4.2)

Where f is the Fanning friction factor. The friction velocity is not a physical velocity,

which one could measure at some point in the flow, but combination of terms that

has the dimensions of a velocity and hence is called a velocity. Using this velocity

as a parameter, we can prepare a universal plot of pipe velocities, as shown in

Figure 7.

Figure 7 shows that in making up the universal velocity distribution it is

necessary to introduce two new combinations of variables, which are in common use

in the fluid mechanics literature. The ratio of the local velocity to the friction velocity

is called u+ (spoken of as u plus). This is also the ratio of the local time-average

2

f . The combination of the

distance from the pipe wall and the friction velocity divided by kinematic viscosity is

called y+. This can be understood as the product of a kind of Reynolds number that is

based on distance from the wall rather than on pipe diameter and

f

2 .

Figure 7 shows that the flow can be divided conceptually into three zones:

1. A laminar sub layer nearest the pipe wall, in which the shear stress is

principally due to viscous shear.

2. A turbulent core in the middle of the pipe, in which the shear stress is

principally due to turbulent Reynolds stresses.

3. A layer between them, called the buffer layer, in which both viscous and

Reynolds stresses are of the same order of magnitude.

Good experimental measurements are difficult to make in the laminar sub layer and

buffer layer, so there is some controversy over the best location for the boundaries

shown in Figure 7. Most investigators place the buffer layer at a y + of approximately

5 to 30. Furthermore, current work seems to indicate that the location of the edge of

these layers is not fixed in place but fluctuates up and down, so these values

indicate only the mean locations of these edges. Thus, Figure 7 may be too simple a

picture of the actual behaviour. Nonetheless, it provides a reasonable conceptual

model and is able to correlate most of the available data with reasonable accuracy.

Figure 7 is for smooth pipes. As shown in [graph roughness], increasing the

roughness of the pipe wall in turbulent flow generally leads to an increase in the

friction factor. In Figure 7, we see that increasing the friction factor will increase y +

and decrease u+, so increasing the roughness while holding everything else constant

will move a point on the curve downward and to the right.

The Steady, Turbulent Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate

There are no known analytic solutions for turbulent boundary layers that are

analogous to Blasiuss solution for the laminar boundary layer on a flat plate. Prandtl,

to describe the steady, turbulent boundary layer on a flat plate, made the following

assumptions:

1. The average velocity in the x direction at any point has the same distribution

in the form

Vx

V

1

7

1/ 7

()

(4.3)

This presupposes that the velocity profiles at any x are similar to each other,

this is the kind of assumption made by Blasius when he assumed that the

velocity was a function on , not of x and y separately.

2. Over the Reynolds number range of 3 x10 3 to 105 the friction factor plot for

smooth pipes can be approximated by

0.0791

f = 1 /2

R

(4.4)

Blasius has shown that this equation fits the smooth-pipes curve in Figure 7

quite well. Prandtl assumed that it could be taken over directly for determining

the shear stress at the surface of the plate, understanding the length term in

Reynolds number given above is twice the thickness of the boundary layer.

Combination (4.3) and (4.4), Prandtl found

1/ 5

v

=0.37 x

V , x

( )

(4.5)

From this equation and several other relations, we can compute the drag coefficient

for a turbulent boundary layer, finding

C 'f=

0.0576

R1/x 5

(4.6)

Cf=

0.072

1/ 5

Rx

(4.7)

These two equations are based on some very severe assumptions, and their use

can be justified only by experimental verification. Most tests have indicated that they

give a very good representation of experimental data. Other experimental data can

be adduced to show that these equations are at least satisfactory for engineering

purpose. (4.7) assumes that the boundary layer is turbulent from the beginning of the

plate (x=0) to the end of the plate. Such as situation can exist if the beginning of the

plate is artificially roughened. However, more commonly (Figure 5) the first part of

the plate has a laminar boundary layer, which then makes a transition to turbulent

flow farther down the plate. To calculate the drag on such a plate, we would calculate

the separate contributions from the laminar and turbulent parts of the boundary layer.

(4.5) also indicated that turbulent boundary layer grow with distance as x to the

1

2

4

5

same distance the boundary layer will be larger and growing faster if it is turbulent

rather than laminar.

Figure 8

FINDING

Water is flowing in a 3 in ID smooth pipe, with an average velocity of 10 ft/s. How far

from the wall are the edge of the laminar sublayer and the the edge of the buffer

layer? What is the time average velocity at each of those points?

ft

0.25 ft

s

R=

=2.3 105

5 2

1.08 10 ft / s

10

ft 0.0037 12

ft

m

u10

=0.44 =0.13

s

2

s

s

From figure 7 at the edge of the laminar sublayer, u+~ 5 and y+ ~5, so

Vx = u+u* = 5 x 0.44 ft/s = 2.6 ft/s = 0.79 m/s

5

5 (1.08 10 ft /s)

u=

=1.2 104 ft=1.4 103 0.037 mm

0.44 ft / s

(rwall r) =

y+ v

(rwall r) = 7 x 10

in = 0.18 mm

This example illustrates why there are so few experimental data in the laminar

sublayer and buffer layer, these layers are extremely thin and have very steep

velocity gradients.

- Jacobs - Design of Slurry Transport SystemsUploaded byjunaidmasoodi
- Viscous FlowUploaded bythyvaibhav
- 1Natural_convectionPaulUploaded byFelipe Arce
- jeas_0514_1082Uploaded byaerob
- 67.IJMPERDFEB201867Uploaded byTJPRC Publications
- J.turbomachinery.2009.Vol.131.N4Uploaded byfernandovz
- MKM99Uploaded bystathiss11
- P5PaperCIL0063Uploaded byKaushik Sarkar
- Exercise 2BUploaded byrighthere201
- Metadc304192 Muy Bueno Este ToberaUploaded byfrankkqqzz
- Fluid Mechanics 2Uploaded bynaeema_58
- • Internal Flows ContinuedUploaded bymsnaghavi
- wake flowUploaded byLuis Fernando Concha Figueroa
- A Final ReportUploaded byQuaid Vohra
- J.fluids.engineering.2009.Vol.131.N6Uploaded byНильва Александр
- DimplesUploaded byraju
- Report Final (1)Uploaded byAdeel Ahmed
- eucass1p237.pdfUploaded byrwilliams9001
- Minimum Fluidization Velocity_2.pdfUploaded byPhuong Le
- lab3.docUploaded byAysun Güven
- cfd exp2-5Uploaded bydxjs
- Hydraulics Lecture MaterialUploaded byAngel Garcia Estella
- PDF 04 0 Extrusion Static Mixer Technical BulletinUploaded byTadamine Maki
- Intube Pressure DropUploaded byPriyanathan Thayalan
- ReynoldUploaded byKester Iyinbor
- J&K Pre 2012 (Civil Engg.)Uploaded byCgpscAspirant
- Physics Solutions ManualUploaded bybenny narrido
- Laminar Flow in a Square Duct of Strong CurvatureUploaded byManuel Ayala
- HEAT TRANSFER CORRELATION FOR NON-BOILING STRATIFIED FLOW PATTERN | J4RV3I11006Uploaded byJournal 4 Research
- Steam hammer- TheoryUploaded byktsnl

- Graph Conversion vs Residence TimeUploaded byNanaNaurah95
- ApparatusUploaded byNanaNaurah95
- Casio 991 Ms User ManualUploaded byilg1
- Getting Married is the Right and Necessity of Life for Every IndividualUploaded byNanaNaurah95
- ResultsUploaded byNanaNaurah95
- Experiment of Shell & Tube Heat ExchangerUploaded byNanaNaurah95
- Report Shell&Tube Heat ExchangerUploaded byNanaNaurah95
- PVT ExperimentUploaded byNanaNaurah95
- Lab Rprt (CSTR)Uploaded byBlack White

- A Hybrid System Approach to Impedance and Admittance ControlUploaded byawright261934mi
- Zenor Diode CharactersticsUploaded byReddyvari Venugopal
- GATE Material Thermodynamics EnggUploaded byZoher Painter
- 3._force_systems.pdfUploaded bynegisbabi
- Trigonometry WorksheetUploaded bytutorciecle123
- Surge CalculationsUploaded byJai Krishna Sahith
- Autism, An Alien Cosmic VisitorUploaded byOuherrie
- 2-Latest EIC-E-1002-0 (DSG-03 Series Solenoid Operated Directional Valves)Uploaded byadhiabhi
- Chapter 6 MethodsUploaded byChami Rupasinghe
- Temelj - Spread FootingUploaded byGordana Sejfulovski
- 13 Solubility equilibria.pdfUploaded byEddy C. Embanglian
- T11_08Uploaded byakshay kothiyal
- DESSOUKY Phd ThesisUploaded bySurendra Gatiganti
- 9A01301 Mechanics of SolidsUploaded bysivabharathamurthy
- Garner 1953Uploaded byBoomday
- Analysis and Design of Aircraft Electrostatic Discharge(Chapter One)Uploaded bybabatunde yinka
- Comparison of PFC Circuit TopologiesUploaded byAJER JOURNAL
- AE74-123-5-J12Uploaded byMahadev
- Chem3-Molar Mass of LithiumUploaded byNor Ashikin Ismail
- rrlUploaded byJefferson Nolty Genovia
- physics study materialUploaded bygaurav
- Modern Chemistry Chapter 12 SolutionsUploaded byManni Piyush Sharma
- ESP A21cUploaded byAnonymous DKv8vp
- The Hardening-soil ModelUploaded byGEOMAHESH
- D2487-11Uploaded byVag Katsikopoulos
- XFEMUploaded byQiang Fang
- ANSYS V11 Rotor Dynamics Web SeminarUploaded byClaudio Haya
- script:-Hydrostatic Curves & CalculationsUploaded byaimri_cochin
- Continuum Hw3(2017)Uploaded byluatnv
- Dental WaxesUploaded bydrgayen6042