Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Facies Modeling
Topics
Geological Facies
Definition :
Definition :
Static Model :
Dynamic Model :
Interdependence of
Reservoir Attributes
Seismic
Attribute(s)
Facies
Porosity
Contact
Permeability
(J-Function)
Height
Above Contact
Saturation
Porosity
Permeability
Sw
Sand-Shale
Channel, Crevasse-Splay, Floodplain, etc.
Example 1 :
Facies at Well Locations
Example 2 :
Facies at Well
Locations
Permeability
Example 3 :
Depositional Facies vs. Property
Ridge
Ridge Margin
Shelf Fines
Shelf Mud
Porosity
Permeability
Example 3 (contd) :
Rock Type vs. Property
Porosity
Rock Type
10
Hierarchical System
Level 1 :
Level 2 :
11
Well Data
12
13
3D Result
(Real #1)
3D Result
(Real #2)
Vert.
Prop.
Curve
2D Trend
Map
14
3D Result
(Real #1)
3D Result
(Real #3)
3D Result
(Real #2)
3D Result
(Real #4)
Trend Modeling
Calculates Probability
of Each Grid Cells
based on Well Data,
Variogram , and 2D
Trend
Available in PETREL
2010
Can be used as input
for TGS or SIS
15
Probability of
Facies 1
Probability of
Facies 3
Probability of
Facies 1
Probability of
Facies 4
TGS Constrained to
Probability from Trend Modeling
16
Constrained to
DEPO Facies
Must be
consistent
with Rock
Type Scheme
From Trend
Modeling
Rock Type
DEPO Facies
Facies
Rock Type
Ridge (RED)
6 (LIGHT BLUE)
17
Seismic Data
Probability Map of Facies Distribution
Diagenesis Model
Other Example of
Conceptual Geological Model
18
Objective :
Application :
Advantage :
Disadvantage :
Sand
Shale
19
20
21
22
Additional Material
23
Transform :
Variogram Analysis
Indicator Transform
0
Facies at Wells
0
0
Indicator
Transform
Facies 2
Facies 3
Category-1
Category-2
1
1
1
1
0
0
Facies 1
Facies Probability
0
at Wells
0
0
0
0
Category-3
24
Facies Probability
At Well Locations
Category-1
Indicator
Kriging
0
0
0.9
0.3
0
0
Result of
Indicator
Kriging
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
Category-3
0 0.050
1
1
0
0
Category-2
0
0
Category-1
0.05
0.05
Category-2
Category-3
CDF
1.0
0.04
Facies 3
0.76
Normalized
0.9
0.3
0.9
0.72
0.3
0.24
Facies 2
0.0
0.04
Facies 1
25
Random
Number
1.0
CDF
1.0
Facies 3
0.76
Facies 2
0.04
0.0
0.0
If Random Number is
a) less than 0.04 then Facies = 1,
b) between 0.04 and 0.76
then Facies = 2,
c) greater than 0.76 then Facies = 3
Facies 1
26
Application :
Procedure :
Advantage :
TGS Procedure
Gaussian
Transform
Facies At
Well Locations
Variogram Analysis
(single variogram)
Indicator
Transform
Ordinary
Kriging
Variogram Analysis
For Each Indicator
1.0
0.76
Indicator
Kriging
0.04
0.0
Probability Of Facies
At Unsampled Locations
Estimated Facies
In Gaussian Domain
(value range from -3 to +3)
1.0
0.76
0.04
0.0
Facies
Assignment
1.0
0.0
0
-3
27
Petrel 2010 :
28
TGS Example
29