Bob greene: this entire chapter of John seems disconnected from the rest of the gospel. Greene: Simon Peter's decision to go fishing in the Sea of Tiberias is curious. He says it's not clear why they did not recognize Jesus when they neared the shore. This is a faint echo of Jn. 6 when Jesus asked the disciples where they would get enough food, he says.
Bob greene: this entire chapter of John seems disconnected from the rest of the gospel. Greene: Simon Peter's decision to go fishing in the Sea of Tiberias is curious. He says it's not clear why they did not recognize Jesus when they neared the shore. This is a faint echo of Jn. 6 when Jesus asked the disciples where they would get enough food, he says.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Bob greene: this entire chapter of John seems disconnected from the rest of the gospel. Greene: Simon Peter's decision to go fishing in the Sea of Tiberias is curious. He says it's not clear why they did not recognize Jesus when they neared the shore. This is a faint echo of Jn. 6 when Jesus asked the disciples where they would get enough food, he says.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
(Acts 5:27-32, 40b-41; Revelation 5:11-14; John 21:1-19)
Certain questions about this gospel jump out at us. None is
easily answered. This entire Chapter 21 of John seems disconnected from the rest of the Gospel. Some commentators even think that it functions like an epilogue to the entire work. Scholars disagree whether the chapter was actually part of the original Gospel. But these questions are better left to be answered by others. Noteworthy is Simon Peter’s decision to go fishing in the Sea of Tiberias (Galilee). This is supposed to be AFTER Jesus had appeared to the disciples gathered together behind locked doors in Jerusalem! That happened in Jn.20 as we heard in last week’s Gospel when Jesus commissioned them to forgive sins, followed by the story of Thomas. It is curious that they returned to Galilee and their fishing after having seen the risen Jesus while in Jerusalem. Some think that this is exactly what the disciples did for a time after the death and resurrection of Christ and that only later did they begin a missionary work that spread throughout the Roman Empire. It is certainly possible. It is anybody’s guess as to why this particular group of fishermen was named: Simon Peter, Thomas, Nathanael, Zebedee’s sons (James and John) and two others unnamed. That there were seven designated fishermen probably had some significance. John liked to use numbers, usually with some perceived intent. Here we know not what he meant. Many reasons for why they did not recognize him when they neared the shore the next morning have been suggested. None satisfies. Some thought it might have been early morning mist or fog. Others suggested they were still too far away. John simply does not say. He calls them “children” (paidia in Greek) when he asks if they have caught anything to eat. We would probably say “guys” as in “Hey, you guys”. The question is a faint echo of Jn. 6 when Jesus had asked the disciples where they would get enough food to feed the multitudes. As it happens the five loaves of bread and two fish fed the five thousand. The beloved disciple recognizes Jesus after they catch the fish, causing Peter to dive into the water. It’s not clear why. Some have suggested some kind of baptismal symbolism, certainly a preachable theme, even if it is reading a lot into this text. Whether we’re supposed to notice that Peter by hauling in the huge catch does what all the others could not do is unclear, but we notice it anyway. It is another curious detail, and never clearly explained. The precise number of fish mentioned (153), large ones at that, is a “great mystery” as St. Augustine is said to have remarked about it. Fr. Raymond Brown in his Anchor Bible Commentary on this passage has almost three pages of material in fine print devoted to the significance of this number (p.1074-1076). Sadly one is no closer to an answer after reading that material than before. It might even be meant to bolster the argument that John was an eyewitness to these events as he had claimed in the conclusion of last week’s Gospel. We’ll leave it as a “great mystery”. The breakfast certainly suggests a Eucharistic setting related to the feeding of the multitude event already mentioned. And finally, Peter is given three opportunities to undo the three denials he had made of knowing Jesus during the Passion. Even as Peter had vehemently denied knowing Jesus, he now vehemently protests that he loves him. Peter just keeps at it until he gets it right, an ideal model for any disciple of Jesus!