You are on page 1of 49

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

&
OPERATION RESEARCH
As per New GATE 2016 Syllabus

Thoroughly explained concepts


25 years IES solved papers with explanations
25 years GATE solved papers with explanations

Corporate Office : Plot No. A-213, Street No.-27, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, Durg (Chhattisgarh) 490006
Phone - 0788-6499334, 4062366 | Website - www.gatementor.co.in | Email - info@igatementor.org

Corporate Office : Plot No. A-213, Street No.-27, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, Durg (Chhattisgarh) 490006
Phone - 0788-6499334, 4062366
Website - www.gatementor.co.in
Email - info@igatementor.org

Industrial Engineering & Operation Research (2016 2017)


Copyright 2015, by GATEMENTOR Publications.
All lrights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a
retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photo-copying,
recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of the above mentioned publisher of this book.

1st Edition : 2015


ISBN 9788193188309

GATEMENTOR Publications has taken due care in collecting the data and providing the solutions,
before publishing this book. Inspite of this, if any inaccuracy or printing error occurs then
GATEMENTOR Publications owes no responsibility. GATEMENTOR Publications will be grateful if
you could point out any such error. Your suggestions will be appreciated.
All rights reserved by GATEMENTOR Publications. No part of this book may be reproduced or
utilized in any form without the written permission from the publisher.

Printed by

PREFACE

The biggest misconception that a competitive exam aspirant has in mind is that hard work is the only key
to success. In order to crack a competitive exam like GATE, IES etc. one needs to understand and fulfill
the demand of the examination. Over the years competitive exams have become even more competitive;
in order to prevail in this environment an aspirant should make sure that his efforts are in the right
direction.
The birth of this book is based on the feedback of
students who have succeeded in GATE and IES examination. As per them there must be a single book
for a single subject that should fulfill all the requirements of the exam, it must be the closest experience
to a classroom coaching and should have enough problems to enhance the application of knowledge.
Thus we came up with this book in Fluid
Mechanics to help the readers in developing a strong concept of the subject. It has 25 years of solved
questions of GATE and IES.
We at GATEMENTOR have vision to guide the students in the most optimum way so that he could utilize
his potential to the utmost. We hope this book will serve that purpose. Any suggestion from the reader
are welcome. Visit our website www.gatementor.co.in for more information on GATEMENTOR and
GATEMENTOR Publications.

Production Planning and Control: Forecasting models,


aggregate production planning, scheduling, materials
requirement planning.
Inventory Control: Deterministic models; safety stock
inventory control systems.
Operations Research: Linear programming, simplex
method, transportation, assignment, network flow models,
simple queuing models, PERT and CPM.

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
&
OPERATION RESEARCH

SYLLABUS

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
&
OPERATION RESEARCH
CONTENT
1.INVENTORY CONTROL
Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

1-1 to 1-12
1-13 to 1-23
1-24 to 1-31
1-32 to 1-35

2.FORECASTING
Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

2-1 to 2-9
2-10 to 2-14
2-15 to 2-20
2-21 to 2-29

3.QUEUEING MODEL
Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

3-1 to 3-8
3-9 to 3-13
3-14 to 3-19
3-20 to 3-21

4.PERT AND CPM


Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

4-1 to 4-12
3-13 to 3-22
3-23 to 3-32
3-33 to 3-37

5. LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEM


Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

5-1 to 5-20
5-21 to 5-30
5-31 to 5-36
5-37 to 5-40

6.TRANSPORTATION MODEL
Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

6-1 to 6-7
6-8 to 6-12
6-13 to 6-16
6-17 to 6-21

7. ASSIGNMENT MODEL
Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

7-1 to 7-6
7-7 to 7-8
7-9 to 7-10
7-11 to 7-14

8. SEQUENCING MODEL
Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

8-1 to 8-7
8-8 to 8-12
8-13 to 8-14
8-15 to 8-16

9. BREAK EVEN ANALYSIS


Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions

9-1 to 9- 6
9-7 to 9-10
9-11 to 9-15

IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

9-16 to 9-18

10. LINE BALANCING


Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

10-1 to 10-5
10-6 to 10-7
10-8 to 10-11
10-12 to 10-13

11. WORK STUDY


Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

11-1 to 11-5
11-6 to 11-9
11-10 to 11-15
11-16 to 11-17

12. MATERIAL REQUIRMENT PLANNING


Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Conventional Questions and Solutions

12-1 to 12-2
12-3 to 12-4
12-5 to 12-8
12-9 to 12-10

13. PRODUCTION PLANNING AND CONTROL


Theory
Gate Objective Questions and Solutions
IES Objective Questions and Solutions

13-1 to 13-2
13-3 to 13-4
13-5 to 13-11

Inventory Control
THEORY

1.1 INTRODUCTION
Stores play a vital role in the operation of a company.
It is in direct touch with the user departments in its
day-to-day activities. The Objective of the stores is to
ensure the smooth flow of production without any
interruption. Stores generally include raw material,
work in progress and finished goods. Effective
storekeeping and inventory control are indispensable
to the control of material cost.

1.2 PURPOSE OF STOREKEEPING


(i)

Storekeeping helps to examine carefully all


goods and materials on receipts.

(ii)

It is essential to arrange for a systematic and


efficient storing of materials.

(iii) Storekeeping ensures accurate and prompt


distribution of materials to user departments as
per issue requisition note.
(iv) It is essential because stores often equated
directly with money, as capital is blocked in
inventories.

1.3 INVENTORY RELATED COSTS


1.3.1 PURCHASE (OR PRODUCTION) COSTS ( PC )
It is the cost of purchasing inventory item and it
depends upon quantity or bulk purchase.
Mathematically,

1.3.2 ORDERING (OR SETUP) COSTS


1. ORDERING COST ( OC )
It is the cost associated with bringing inventory items
within the production system. It includes cost of
tender, cost associated with processing and chasing
of purchase order, inspection cost, transportation cost
etc.
2. SETUP COST ( SC )
When inventory items required are produced
internally, the cost associated with bringing
shutdown production system again into starting
position is termed as setup cost. It includes
maintenance cost, schedule chart preparation cost,
Cost associated with arrangement of worker etc.
Mathematically,

OC SC n C0
Where,

n Number of order or setup

C0 Ordering cost per order or setup cost per setup

1.3.3 CARRYING (OR HOLDING) COSTS ( HC )


It is the cost associated with storing and keeping
inventory item with in the production system. This
cost depends upon the quantity and period for which
inventory is stored. It includes storage cost, handling
cost, Locked up cost, capital interest etc.
Mathematically,

PC x C

HC I av Ch

Where,

Where,

PC Purchase cost

HC Holding or carrying cost

x Number of unit

I av Average Inventory

C Unit cost

Ch Holding cost/unit/time

copyright reserved

1-2 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research

1.3.4. SHORTAGE (STOCK OUT) COST ( SC )

1.4.4 TIME HORIZON

Shortage simply means absence of Inventory and loss


associated with not serving the customer is termed as
shortage or stock-out cost. It includes potential profit
delay loss, fast transportation cost, discount etc.

It is the period over which inventory level can be


controlled. It can be finite or infinite.

Mathematically,

It is the time between ordering a replenishment and


receiving into inventory. It can be deterministic
(constant or variable) or probabilistic.

SC n Cs
SC Shortage cost

n Number of unit short

1.4.5 LEAD TIME

1.4.6 STOCK REPLENISHMENT

Cs = Shortage cost/unit

It is the rate at which items are added to the


inventory. It can be instantaneous or uniform rate.

1.3.5. TOTAL COST ( TC )

1.4.7 REORDER LEVEL

It is the sum of all type of above mentioned cost.

It is the inventory level at which order is placed.

TC PC OC HC SC

Where,

1.4.8 BUFFER STOCK

TC Total cost

It is the minimum stock level that a company


maintains.

PC Purchasing Cost
OC Ordering Cost
HC Holding or carrying cost
SC Shortage or stock out cost

1.4 GENERAL TERMS


1.4. 1 DEMAND
(i)

Customer's demand, size of demand, rate of


demand and pattern of demand is important.

(ii)

Size of demand = no. of items demanded per


period.

1.4.9 ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY (E.O.Q)


The economic order quantity (EOQ) is the order
quantity that minimizes total variable cost for the
year.
If purchase cost is independent of number of unit
and no shortage is allowed then total variable cost
will be sum of ordering cost ( OC ) and holding cost (
HC ). The variation of ordering cost ( OC ), holding
Cost ( HC ) and Total Cost ( TC ) with Lot size is
shown below.

(iii) It may be deterministic (Static or dynamic) or


probabilistic (governed by discrete or
continuous probability distribution).

Economic order
Quantity (EOQ)

1.4.2 LOT SIZE

Costs

(iv) The rate of demand can be variable or constant.

Total costs

Holding costs

Number of units ordered in one lot.


Order costs

1.4.3 ORDER CYCLE


It is the time period between placements of two
orders.

Order quantity

Figure 1.1

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-3

1.5 CHARACTERISTIC OF INVENTORY


MODEL

1.6 INVENTORY MODEL

1.5.1 DEPENDENT
ITEM

This model is based on the assumption that all the


parameter associated with inventory can be
computed with certainty. Demand rate and lead time
are independent of demand.

AND

INDEPENDENT DEMAND

Production

MRP

Dependent

No. of class
Demand/
day

20 Cars/day

100 Types/day

1.6.1 DETERMINISTIC INVENTORY MODEL

Independent

1.6.2 PROBABILISTIC INVENTORY MODEL

Forecasting

In this model demand rate and lead time are variable


and fluctuating.

Sales and
Marketing

Figure 1.2
1. DEPENDENT DEMAND ITEM
The demand for these items is not related or linked to
any other items directly. It is difficult to compute and
is projected with the help of forecasting.
2. INDEPENDENT DEMAND ITEM
The demand for these items is directly related or
linked to demand of any other item.

1.5.2 INVENTORY REVIEW SYSTEM

1.7 BASIC DETERMINISTIC INVENTORY


MODELS
(i)

EOQ Model with Uniform Demand

(ii)

EOQ Model with Different rates of Demands in


different cycles

(iii) EOQ Model


allowed

with

Shortages

(iv) EOQ Model with Uniform Replenishment


NOTATIONS USED
Q No of units (or quantity) ordered per order

D Demand of units of inventory per year


N No. of orders per year

1. Q SYSTEM (FIXED ORDER SYSTEM)

TC Total inventory cost (Rs / year)

In this system, when inventory level reaches reorder


level a fresh order is placed at that point of specified
quantity.

C0 Ordering cost per order

In this system size of order is fixed while time of


order is variable. This system is also called Reorder
point system or two bin system.
2. P SYSTEM (FIXED PERIOD SYSTEM)
In this system inventory is reviewed after a fixed
period of time and fresh order is placed at that point.
In this system size of order is variable while time of
order is fixed. This system is also called Periodic
review system.

(backorders)

Ch Cc Carrying or holding cost per unit per period


of time (Rs/unit/year)

Cs Shortage cost per unit per year


Cs Reorder Point

L Lead time (weeks or month etc.)


p Replenishment (or production) rate
d Demand rate
OC Ordering Cost

HC Holding or carrying cost


SC Shortage or stock out cost

Tv Total variable cost


I m Maximum inventory

copyright reserved

1-4 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


OC N C0

I av Average inventory
I av Average inventory
S Shortage allowed per order

Q Order quantity (Lot size)

Q* Economic order quantity (EOQ)


S* Shortage allowed at EOQ

(v)

D
C0
Q

OC

C0 D
Q .(iv)

Carrying cost

I* Maximum inventory at EOQ

1.7.1 MODEL 1- EOQ MODEL


DEMAND

OC

HC I av Ch
WITH

UNIFORM

HC

Q
Ch
2

(v)

(vi) Total variable cost ( Tv )

ASSUMPTIONS

Tv OC HC

1. Demand rate uniform.


2. Replenishment rate infinite (Goods arrive the
same day they are ordered i.e. infinite
replenishment rate).
3. Shortage not allowed.

Tv

(vi)

(vii) Economic order quantity (EOQ or Q*),


At EOQ or Q*

Inventory

Tv Minimum

Maximum
inventory (Im)

Average
Average Inv.
Inventory

Time
Time

tc cycle time

Figure 1.3

(ii) Average inventory


1
I av tc I m tc
2
Im Q
I av

2 2.
(iii) Number of order/year,
D
Q

(iv) Ordering cost ( OC )

0
Q Q*

C0 D Ch

0
Q*2
2

Q* EOQ

EOQ Model with Uniform Demand

(i) Maximum Inventory( I m )


Im Q

dTv
dQ

From equation (vi)

C0 D ChQ

Q
2

2C0 D
Ch

(vii)

(viii) Minimum total yearly variable cost Tv min


(i)

Total variable
Q EOQ (i.e.Q* )

cost

will

be

minimum

at

From equation (vi)

Tv min

(ii)

C0 D ChQ*

Q*
2

From equation (vii)

Tv min

(iii)

2C0Ch D

(viii)

(ix) Total cost ( TC )

TC Tv ( D C )

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-5


TC

C0 D ChQ

(D C)
Q
2

(ix)

At EOQ,

TC min

Sol. (B)
Demand, D 50000 unit / year
Per order cost,

2C0Ch D ( D C )

(x)

Co 3 12

Co 15

If the carrying cost per unit per year is given as %age


of per unit cost or carrying cost is given as
percentage of average inventory cost, then,

Carrying cost per unit per year,

Ch = I x C

Cc 0.06 0.004

Cc Rs 0.084 per unit per year

Where,

I Percentage of average Inventory cost.


EXAMPLE 1.1
In an ideal inventory control system, the economic
lot size for a part is 1000. If the annual demand for
the part is doubled the new economic lot size
required will be
(GATE 1989)
(A) 500

(B) 2000

(C) 1000

(D) 1000 2

Sol (D)

T 2CoCc D

2 15 0.084 50000

T Rs 355

1.7.2 MODEL -2 EOQ MODEL WITH SHORTAGES


(BACKORDERS) ALLOWED
Assumptions of this model are same as those of
model 1 except
2. Replenishment rate infinite (Goods arrive the
same day they are ordered i.e. infinite
replenishment rate).

2C0 D
Ch

3. Shortage allowed.

2C0 2 D
Ch

EOQ 2 EOQ
EOQ 2 1000

Minimum yearly total variable cost,

1. Demand rate uniform.

2C0 D
EOQ
Ch
EOQ

EOQ 2

1000
50000

Quantity

EXAMPLE 1.2
A precision company consumes 5000 unit of a
component per year. The ordering cost are Re 3 per
order. The trucking cost are Rs 12 per order. Interest
cost is Rs 0.06 per unit per year. Deterioration and
obsolescence cost Rs 0.004 per unit / year. Storage
cost is Rs 1000 per year for 50000 units. The total
yearly variable cost at EOQ will be:
(A) Rs 375

(B) Rs 355

(C) Rs 325

(D) Rs 390

Im
C
B

Time

t1
s
t2

F
tc

Figure 1.4

t2 Time during which there is a shortage and back


orders occurs

copyright reserved

1-6 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


t1 Time during which stock is available

SC

t Time between receipt of orders

(vii) Total variable cost ( Tv )

(Reorder cycle time t = t1 + t2)

Tv OC HC SC

Lead time is assumed to be zero.


(i)

Relationship between I m & S

Im S Q
(ii)

Tv

(i)

Average inventory ( I av )& Average shortage


( S av )

C0 D Ch I m2 CS S 2

Q
2Q
2Q

At EOQ (i.e. Q Q* ),
Total variable cost ( Tv ) will be minimum
By minimizing Total variable cost, we get

...(ii)

E.O.Q Q*

and

1
I av tc I m t1
2

(iii)

I m2
2Q

2Co D Ch Cs
Ch
Cs

(ix) Optimum remaining unit after back order (I*) ,

From equation (ii) and (iii),

I av

(iv)

(x)

Optimum amount of back order (S*),


S* Q * I *

Sav

S2
2Q

(v)

(xi) Total optimum inventory cost,

Tv min

(iii) Number of order/year,


N

D
Q

(vi)

Ordering cost ( OC )

OC

D
C0
Q

OC

C0 D
Q

(vii)

HC Ch I av

CI
2Q

(vi) Shortage cost ( SC ),

SC Cs Sav

Cs
Ch Cs

(xii) Total cost ( TC )

TC Tv ( D C )

(i) Total cost per year


(ii) Time between two order

Inventory carrying cost ( HC ),


2
h m

2C 0 Ch D

EXAMPLE 1.3
A particular item has a demand of 9000 unit per year.
The unit cost of the item is Rs 100 and holding cost
per unit is Rs 2.40 per year. The shortage cost is Rs 5
per unit per year price of one item is Rs 1. Determine

OC N C0

(v)

2Co D
Cs
Ch
Ch Cs

I*

Similarly,

(iv)

(viii)

(viii) Economic order Quantity ( EOQ or Q* )

Triangle ABC and AFE are similar triangle,


Im Q
I
t1 m tc
t1 tc
Q

CS S 2
2Q

Sol.

(vii)

Demand

D 9000 unit / year

Ordering cost Co Rs100 / order


Holding cost

Cc Rs 2.4 per unit / year

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-7


Shortage cost

Cs Rs 5 perunit / year

Unit cost

C Rs1

The objective of this model is to determine optimal


production lot size Q*.
For this model it is assumed that

EOQ,

1. Demand and production rate uniform.

2Co D
Cc C2

Cc
Cs

Q*

Q 1053unit

2. Replenishment rate finite


3. Shortage not allowed.

t1 = length of each production run size


(i) Order Quantity (Q),

(i) Total yearly cost,

Cs
T 2Co Cc D
Cc Cs

Q pt1

C D

Cs
2 100 2.4 9000
Cc Cs

(ii) Maximum inventory

1 9000

T Rs10710

d
I m 1 dt1
p

d
I m 1 Q
p

(ii) Time between order,

to

I m pt1 dt1

Q 1053

0.117 year
D 9000

(iii) Average inventory

1
I av tc I m tc
2

42.705day
43day

1.7.3 MODEL 3 EOQ MODEL WITH UNIFORM


REPLENISHMENT

I av

Im
2

I av

Im d Q
1
2
p 2

(iv) Number of order/year,


p

Q
Im

Average inventory level

(v) Ordering Cost ( OC ),

pd
t1

D
Q

I av
t2

OC N C0
OC

D
C0
Q

OC

C0 D
Q

Figure 1.5

(vi) Inventory carrying cost ( HC ),

HC Ch I av

copyright reserved

1-8 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


C0 Rs. 25/order

d Q
HC Ch 1
p 2

Ch Rs. 5/unit/year

(viii) Total variable cost ( Tv )

p 100 units/day

Tv OC HC
D d Q
TC Co 1
Q
p 2
(ix) Economic order Quantity ( EOQ or Q* )

Consumption rate d
EOQ Q*

At EOQ (i.e. Q Q* ),

2C0 D p

Ch
pd

Q 612.37 613units

So Number of Production run

By minimizing Total variable cost, we get

2Co D
Ch

p
pd

(x) Minimum total variable cost ( Tv min )


pd
2CoCh D
p

2Co D
Ch

100 60
2 25 5 15000

100
Rs.1225

(xii) Total cost ( TC )

EXAMPLE 1.4
Determine the number of production runs and also
the total incremental cost in a factory for the data
given below.
(GATE 1997)
Annual
=
15,000 units
requirement
=
Rs.25
Preparation cost per
=
Rs.5/unit/year
order
=
100 units/day
Inventory holding
=
250/year
cost

250
25
10

pd
2 C0 Ch D

pd
p

TC Tv ( D C )

And Total incremental cast

(xi) Maximum Inventory at E.O.Q(I*),


I*

D
Q*

1.7.4 MODEL 4 : GRADUAL


SHORTAGE ARE CONSIDERED.

1. Demand and production rate uniform.


2. Replenishment rate finite
3. Shortage allowed.
Q

Production rate
Number of working
days
Sol.

DEMAND AND

d)

E.O.Q Q*

(p
-

Total variable cost ( Tv ) will be minimum

Tv min

15000
60units/day
250

t
S

Figure 1.6

D 15000 units /year

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-9


d
I m 1 Q S
p

(i)

(ii)

EOQ,

Economic order quantity


EOQ Q*

Qo

2 DC0
C Cs
p

h
Ch
pd
Cs

Total variable cost at EOQ

2Co D Cs p d

Ch Ch Cs p

t1

Qo 4669

month
P 3000

t1 1.56 month
NOTE
(i) For Model I

Cs & p

(iv) Maximum inventory at EOQ ( I * )

d
I* 1 Q* S*
p

EXAMPLE 1.5
The demand for an item in a company is 18000 unit
per year. The company can produce 3000 unit per
month, setup cost is Rs 500, holding Cost is 15 paisa
per unit per month and shortage cost is Rs 20 per
year. The manufacturing time in month will be:
(A) 1.56

(B) 3

(C) 2

(D) 3.56

Sol. (A) :
Given data,
Demand,

(ii) For Model II


p

(iii) For Model III

Cs
NOTE
In some condition discount is offered of unit
purchase price of inventory for large quantity
purchase. These discount take the form of price
break. As discount is offered on unit purchase price
so in order to determine best order size, we need to
consider purchasing cost along with ordering and
holding cost. The problems with price break have
been discussed in below given examples.

D 18000 unit / year

18000
unit / month
12

P
PD

Manufacturing time,

(iii) Maximum inventory at EOQ ( I * )

I*

2Co D Cs Cc
Cc
Cs

Q0 4669 unit

Cs p d
2 DCo Ch

Ch Cs p

Tv EOQ

Cs Rs.1.67 per unit per month

D 1500 unit / month

EXAMPLE 1.6
A company is offered the following price breaks for
order quantity
(GATE 2001)
Order quantity
Price (Rs.)

Production rate,

0 100

150

P 3000 unit / month

101 and above

100

Setup cost

Co Rs 500 / run

Holding cost

Cc 0.15 Rs per unit / month

Shortage cost

Cs Rs 20 per unit per year

Order cost is Rs.60 per order while the holding cost is


10% of the purchase price. Determine the economic
order quantity (EOQ) if the annual requirement is
1000 units.

copyright reserved

1-10 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


Sol.

Sol. (B)
D 1000units/year

Given data,

C0 Rs.60 / order

Demand,
D 50 unit / month

If price is Rs. 150 / unit

Ch1 0.1150 Rs.15 / unit / year

EOQ I

2C0 D
2 1000 60

89.44units
Ch1
15

D 600 unit / year

Ordering cost C0 Rs10 / order


Carrying cost Cc 0.2C C unit cost

90units

1.8 PROBABILISTIC MODEL

If price is Rs. 100/unit (assuming order quantity


is greater than 100)

In this model demand rate and lead time are variable


and fluctuating.

Then

Factors encouraging higher safety stock:-

Ch2 0.1100 Rs.10 / unit / year

(i) When the demand rate and lead time fluctuations


are more and variable.

EOQ II

2 1000 60
10

109.5 110 units 100

T .C I

1000
90
60 15 1000 150
90
2

Rs.151342

T .C II

(ii) When the inventory holding cost is very less and


is off not much concern.
(iii) When the loss associated with stock out is very
high.
(iv) When the No. of orders in a year are more
(v) In order to provide better customer satisfaction.

1000
110
60
10 1000 100
110
2

Rs.101095

ROL = Average demand during lead time (ADDLT)


+ Safety Stock (SS) during lead time
ROL ADDLT SS

T .C II T .C I

ADDLT LT d

So, EOQ 110 units


EXAMPLE 1.7
A shop keeper has uniform demand of an item at the
rate of Rs. 50 unit/month. Ordering cost is Rs
10/order and inventory carry cost of is 20% of stock
value. Unit cost of the item is Rs 6. Supplier offers 5%
discount on order between 200 and 999 and 10%
discount on order exceeding or equal to 1000. The
order quantity at which total cost will be minimum is
(A) 100

(B) 200

(C) 300

(D) 104

ROL LT d SS

Qaug

Q
SS
2

Where,
ROL Reorder level

ADDLT = Average demand during lead time


SS = Safety Stock (SS) during lead time

Q = Lot size

Qaug = Average lot size

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-11


Sol.

1.8.1 DEMAND PROFIT MODEL


Static Inventory Model

Demand P

D Demand

0.15 0.15

S Supply

0.25 0.4

IP Incremental Profit/unit

0.15 0.55 p s 1

0.2

0.75 p s

0.1

0.85

0.15 1.00

IL Incremental Loss/unit
In this model demand is uncertain and decision is
based upon single order i.e. re-ordering is not
permitted. This model is applied for perishable items
like vegetables, fruits, flowers etc. or for those items
which become outdated very fast. In order to
maximize our profit we select the ordering quantity (
s ) such that

p s 1

Cumulative

probability

of

having

p s Cumulative probability of having demand s


units.

IP = Incremental Profit/unit when material is sold

IL = Incremental Loss/unit when material is not sold


or material becomes outdated.
EXAMPLE 1.8
A shopkeepers wants to optimize his profit when he
purchase a product for Rs. 70 each and sale it as Rs
100 each if the stock is left unsold he can return it at
Rs. 50 each. Find the optimum stock level for
maximum profit.
Demand
P
0.15

0.25

0.15

0.2

0.1

0.15
Table 1.1

IP 100 70 30

IP
30

0.6 (0.55to0.75)
IP IL 30 20

demand ' s 1 ' units.

Table 1.2
IL 70 50 20

IP
ps
IP IL

Where,

p s 1

CP

Since the above value is between cumulative


probability of demand 4 and 5. Therefore demand 5
will be stock level at maximum profit.

1.8.2 SERVICE LEVEL MODEL


This model is preferred where the loss associated
with stock out is not known exactly. In this model the
level of safety stock is kept according to the level of
service arrangement wants to achieve.
Service level
Number of unitssupplied without delay

total no.of unitsdemanded

LT
S 0 to1
S % 0to100%

95% service level is the standard value at its simply


means that 95% of the customers demand on an
average is fulfilled during lead time and only 5% of
the customers order are rejected because of stock out
during lead time.
When the demand during lead time may be
approximated by a normal distributed curve with a
certain mean x or & standard deviation than
Re-order level is given byROL x z.

copyright reserved

1-12 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


ss z. (safety stock)

Sol.

Where x average demand during lead time

At LT is of 4 weeks & it is one complete cycle so


' ' should be also corresponding to LT.

x LT d

standard deviation for the demand variation


during lead time.

'2 2 2 2 2

z standard normal variate whose value demand


depends upon the level of service management
wants to achieve.

' 2 2 150 300

z Service level %

4 2

(1) Safety stock,

ss z. 1.645 300 494units


(2) ROL LT d ss

0.60 ______80%

4 600 494

1.20 ______ 90%

2894units

1.645 ____ 95%

(3) ss ch 494 0.1 52

2.33 _______ 99%

494 5.2

EXAMPLE 1.9
For a product cost per unit is Rs. 40 and average
weekly demand is of 600 units with weekly standard
deviation of 150 unit holding cost is Rs.
0.1/unit/week and lead time is known to be constant
at 4 weeks than for 95% service level. Value of
standard normal variate (z) for 95 % service level is
1.645.find

Rs 2568.4

(1) Safety stock


(2) ROL
(3) Annual cost of maintaining safety stock

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-13

GATE OBJECTIVE QUESTIONS


(GATE 1989)
1.

(GATE 1999)

In an ideal inventory control system, the


economic lot size for a part is 1000. If the annual
demand for the part is doubled the new
economic lot size required will be
(A) 500

(B) 2000

(C)1000

(D) 1000 2

5.

(GATE 1991)
2.

When the annual demand of a product is 24000


units, the EOQ (Economic Order Quantity) is
2000 units. If the annual demand is 48000 units
the most appropriate EOQ will be
(A) 1000 units

(B) 2000 units

(C) 2800 units

(D) 4000 units

6.

In computing Wilsons economic lot size for an


item, by mistake the demand rate estimate used
was 40% higher than the true demand rate. Due
to this error in the lot size computation, the total
cost of setups plus inventory holding per unit
time, would rise above the true optimum by
approximately
(A) 1.4%

(B) 6.3%

(C) 18.3%

(D) 8.7%

Demands for parts in weeks 1, 2, 3 are : 200, 300,


500 units respectively while available capacities
for production in the three weeks are for: 350,
350, 350 units respectively. Inventory holding
cost is Rs.h per week.
(i)

To minimize total Inventory holding cost


while meeting demands on time,
determine the production quantities in
weeks 1, 2, 3.

(ii)

If the optimization problem above is


formulated as a Linear Program,
determine the Shadow Price of the
capacity constraint in the Third week.

(GATE 1995)
3.

If the demand for an item is doubled and the


ordering cost halved, the economic order
quantity
(A) Remains unchanged
(B) Increases by a factor of 2
(C) Is doubled

(GATE 2000)

(D) Is halved

7.

(GATE 1997)
4.

Determine the number of production runs and


also the total incremental cost in a factory for
the data given below.
Annual
requirement

15,000 units

Rs.25

Preparation cost
per order

Rs.5/unit/year

Inventory
holding cost

100 units/day

250/year

Production rate
Number
of
working days

A company places orders for supply of two


items A and B. The order cost for each of the
items is Rs.300/order. The inventory carrying
cost is 18% of the unit price per year per unit.
The unit prices of the items are Rs.40 and Rs.50
respectively.
The annual demands are 10,000 and 20,000
respectively.
(A) Find the economic order quantities and the
minimum total cost
(B)

A supplier is willing to give a 1% discount


on price, if both the items are ordered from
him and if the order quantities for each
item are 1000 units or more. Is it profitable
to avail the discount?
copyright reserved

1-14 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


12.

0 100

150

A company has an annual demand of 1000


units, ordering cost of Rs.100/order and
carrying cost of Rs.100/unit year. If the stockout costs are estimated to be nearly Rs.400 each
time the company runs out-of-stock, the safety
stock justified by the carrying cost will be

101 and above

100

(A) 4

(B) 20

(C) 40

(D) 100

(GATE 2001)
8.

A company is offered the following price breaks


for order quantity
Order quantity Price (Rs.)

Order cost is Rs.60 per order while the holding


cost is 10% of the purchase price. Determine the
economic order quantity (EOQ) if the annual
requirement is 1000 units.

(GATE 2006)
13.

Price quoted by a supplier

(GATE 2002)
9.

Order quantity (units) Unit price (Rs.)

An item can be purchased for Rs.100. The


ordering cost is Rs.200 and the inventory
carrying cost is 10% of the item cost per annum.
If the annual demand is 4000 units, then
economic order quantity (in units) is
(A) 50

(B) 100

(C) 200

(D) 400

Market demand for springs is 8,00,000 per


annum. A company purchases these springs in
lots and sells them. The cost of making a
purchase order is Rs.1,200. The cost of storage of
springs is Rs.120 per stored piece per annum.
The economic order quantity is
(A) 400

(B) 2,828

(C) 4,000

(D) 8,000

(GATE 2004)
11.

There are two products P and Q with the


following characteristics

Product Demand
(Units)
P
100
Q
400

Order Cost
(Rs/order)
50
50

Holding
Cost
(Rs./unit/year)
4
1

Table 1.3
The economic order quantity (EOQ) of products
P and Q will be in the ratio

< 500

10

> 500

9
Table 1.4

Annual demand: 2500 units per year, Ordering


cost: Rs.100 per order, Inventory holding rate:
25% of unit price.

(GATE 2003)
10.

Consider the following data for an item.

The optimum order quantity (in units) is:

14.

(A) 447

(B) 471

(C) 500

(D) 600

A stockiest wishes to optimize the number of


perishable items he needs to stock in
any
month in his store. The demand distribution for
this perishable item is:
Demand (in units) 2
Probability

0.10 0.35 0.35 0.20


Table 1.5

The stockiest pays Rs.70 for each item and he


sells each at Rs.90. if the stock is left unsold in
any month, he can sell the item at Rs.50 each.
There is no penalty for unfulfilled demand. To
maximize the expected profit, the optimal stock
levelis:

(A) 1:1

(B) 1:2

(A) 5 units

(B) 4 units

(C) 1:4

(D) 1:8

(C) 3 units

(D)2 units

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-15


(GATE 2005)
15.

18.

The distribution of lead-time demand fro an


item is as follows:
Lead time demand Probability
80

0.20

100

0.25

120

0.30

140

0.25
Table 1.6

(B) 50%

(C) 75%

(D) 100%

(GATE 2007)
16.

19.

17.

(B) 2800

(C) 4800

(D) 6800

In machine shop, pins of 15 mm diameter are


produced at a rate of 1000 per month and the
same is consumed at a rate of 500 per month.
The production and consumption continue
simultaneously till the maximum inventory is
reached. Then inventory is allowed to reduce to
zero due to consumption. The lot size of
production is 1000. If backlog is not allowed, the
maximum inventory level is
(A) 400

(B) 500

(C) 600

(D) 700

(B) 250

(C) 225

(D) 260

A company uses 2555 units of an item annually.


Delivery lead time is 8 days. The recorder point
(in number of units) to achieve optimum
inventory is
(A) 7

(B) 8

(C) 56

(D) 60

(GATE 2010)
20.

The maximum level of inventory of an item 100


and it is achieved with infinite replenishment
rate. The inventory becomes zero over one and
half month due to consumption at a uniform
rate. This cycle continues throughout the year.
Ordering cost is Rs. 100 per order and inventory
carrying cost is Rs. 10 per item per month.
Annual cost (in Rs.) of the plan, neglecting
material cost, is
(A) 800

(A) 200

(GATE 2009)

The reorder level is 1.25 times the expected


value of the lead-time demand. The service level
is
(A) 25%

The net requirements of an item over 5


consecutive weeks are 50-0-15-20-20. The
inventory carrying cost and ordering cost are
Re. 1 per item per week and Rs. 100 per order
respectively. Starting inventor is zero, Use
"Least Unit Cost Technique' for developing the
plan. The cost of the plan (in Rs.) is

Annual demand for window frames is 10000.


Each frame costs Rs. 200 and ordering cost is Rs.
300 per order. Inventory holding cost is Rs. 40
per frame per year. The supplier is willing to
offer 2% discount if the order quantity is 1000 or
more, and 4% if order quantity is 2000 or more.
If the total cost is to be minimized, the retailer
should
(A) Order 200 frames every time
(B) Accept 2% discount
(C) Accept 4% discount
(D) Order Economic Order Quantity

(GATE 2014)
21.

Consider the following data with reference to


elementary deterministic economic order
quantity model

Annual demand of an item


100000
Unit price of the item (in Rs.)
10
Inventory carrying cost per unit per year (in 1.5
Rs.)
Unit order cost (in Rs.)
30
Table1.7
The total number of economic orders per year to
meet the annual demand is _______

copyright reserved

1-16 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


22.

A manufactures can produce 12000 bearings per


day. The manufacturer received an order of
8000 bearings per day from a customer. The cost
of holding a bearing in stock, is Rs. 0.20 per
month. Setup cost per production run is Rs. 500.
Assuming 300 working days in a year, the
frequency of production run should be
(A) 4.5 days

(B) 4.5 months

(C) 6.8 days

(D)6.8 months

24. Annual demand of a product is 5000 units and


the ordering cost is Rs. 7000 per order.
Considering the basic economic order quantity
model, the economic order quantity is 10000
units. When the annual inventory cost is
minimized, the annual inventory holding cost (in
Rs.) is____________

(GATE 2015)
23. The annual requirement of rivets at a ship
manufacturing company is 2000 kg. The rivets are
supplied in units of 1 kg consistingRs. 25 each. If
it costs Rs. 100 to place an order and the annual
cost of carrying one unit is 9% of its purchase
cost, the cycle length of the order (in orders) will
be__________

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-17

ANSWER KEY
1 (D) 2 (C) 3 (A)
4
5 (C) 6
7
8
9 (D) 10 (C)
11 (C) 12 (C) 13 (C)
14 (B)
15 (B) 16 (D) 17 (B) 18 (D) 19 (C) 20 (C)
21 (50) 22 (C) 23 (76.996) 24 (35000)

SOLUTION
1.

(D)

EOQ2

2C0 D
EOQ
Ch
2C0 D
Ch

EOQ

EOQ

2.

EOQ2 EOQ1
4.(C)

2C0 2 D
Ch

EOQ 2 EOQ
EOQ 2 1000

D 15000 units /year

C0 Rs 25/order

Ch Rs 5/unit/year

p 100 units/day

(C)

EOQ

2C0 D
Ch

Consumption rate d

EOQ D
EOQ2

EOQ1

EOQ Q*

D2

D
Q*

250
25
10

And Total incremental cast

D2 2D
C02

pd
2 C0 Ch D

C0
2

EOQ2

EOQ2

2C0 D p

Ch
pd

So Number of Production run

(A)

2C0 D
EOQ1
Ch

15000
60units/day
250

Q 612.37 613units

D1

EOQ2
48000

2000
24000
EOQ2 2828 2800

3.

2C0 D
Ch

100 60
2 25 5 15000

100

2C02 D2
Ch

C0
2D
2
Ch

Rs.1225

5. (C)
Total cost 2C0Ch D
% Change in Total cost
copyright reserved

1-18 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


2C0Ch D2 2C0Ch D1

2C0Ch D1

D2 D1

D1

100

100

Where D2 1.4D1

1.4 1 100

18.32%

6.(-)

Total cost at EOQ

TC A total variablecost A Purchasingcost A

TC A

2C0ChA DA C A DA

T .C A

2 10000 300 7.2 40 10000

TC A Rs.406572.67
TC B total variablecost B Purchasingcost B

TC B

2C0ChB DB CB DB

T .C B

2 20000 300 9 50 20000

Available capacities are sufficient for 1st and 2nd


week but in 3rd week 150 units are extra
required

TC B Rs.1010392.305

So, Production in 1st week = 300 units

Total cost for A and B,

2nd week = 350 units

TC TC A TC B

3rd week = 350 units

Rs.1416965

On increasing the production capacity of the


third week by 1 unit, allow me to reduce the
holding cost by 2h and thus reducing the total
cost. This value 2h is nothing but the unit
worth(Shadow price) of the third constraint.
7. ( )

(B) But for 1% Discount

DA 10000units/year
C0 Rs.300 / order
CA 0.99 40 Rs.39.6

Demand of A DA 10000 units / year


Demand of B DB 20000 units / year

CA 0.18 39.6 Rs.7.13 / unit / year

Ordering cast C0 Rs.300 / order

EOQ A

Unit cost

918units

CA Rs 40/ unit
CB Rs 50/ unit
Carrying cast
ChA 0.18 40 Rs.7.2 / unit / year
ChB 0.18 50 Rs.9 / units / year

(A)

EOQ A

2C0 DA
2 10000 300

ChA
7.128

918 is less than 1000 units so to get 1%


discount order at least 1000 units,

Hence order quantity of item A to get discount


is,

QA 1000
So, Total cost for A

T .C A ordering + carrying + Product cost


2C0 DA

912.87 913
ChA

EOQ B

2C0 DB
1154.7 1155
ChB

10000
1000
300
1000
2
7.128 1000 40

T .C A

T .C A Rs.402564
copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-19


109.5 110 units 100

For B

DB 20000units/year

T .C I

C0 Rs.300 / order

1000
90
60 15 1000 150
90
2

CB 0.99 50 Rs.49.5

Rs.151342

CB 0.18 49.5 Rs.8.91/ unit / year

T .C II

EOQ B

2C0 DB
2 20000 300

ChB
8.91

Rs.101095
T .C II T .C I

EOQ B 1161units

So, EOQ 110 units

Total cost for B

20000
1161
300
8.91
1161
2
20000 50 0.99

T .C B

9.(D)

EOQ

Rs.1000340

So, under discount Total cost of A and B,


TC TC A TC B
TC Rs. 1402904

Total cost after discount is less than total cost


before discount , therefore it is profitable to
avail discount.

1000
110
60
10 1000 100
110
2

2C0 D
Ch

2 4000 200
0.1 100

400units

10.(C)

EOQ

8.( )

2C0 D
Ch

2 800000 1200
120

D 1000units/year

C0 Rs.60 / order

4000units

If price is Rs. 150 / unit


Ch1 0.1150 Rs.15 / unit / year

EOQ I

2C0 D
2 1000 60

Ch1
15

89.44units 90units

If price is Rs. 100/unit (assuming order quantity


is greater than 100)

EOQ P

2 100 50
50
4

EOQ Q

2 400 50
200
1

EOQ P
EOQ Q

1
4

12. (C)

Then
Ch2 0.1100 Rs.10 / unit / year

EOQ II

11.(C)

2 1000 60
10

Given,
Demand D 1000unit/year
Ordering cost C0 Rs. 100/order

copyright reserved

1-20 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


Holding cost Ch Rs100/unit/year

So,

Shortage cost Cs Rs.400/unit/yea

EOQ 500 units

Safety stock at EOQ,

2C0 D
Cs
S*
Ch
Ch Cs

2 100 1000
400
S*
100
100 400

S* 40units

14. (B)
Selling Price S Rs. 90
Cost Price C Rs. 70
Salvage value (V) = Rs. 50
Incremental Profit
IP S C 90 70 Rs 20

Incremental loss

13. (C)
D 2500 unit / year
F Rs.100 / order

For Q 500

IL C V 70 50 Rs 20

Cumulative probability

CP

IP
IP IL

CP

20
0.5
20 20

Then unit cost,

Ch 0.2510 Rs.2.5 / unit / year


EOQ

2C0 D
2 2500 100

447units
Ch
2.5

Demand Probability Cumulative


Probability

2500
447
100
2.5 2500 10
T .C
447
2
65.26118

Now,
EOQ 500

EOQ

2C0 D
2 2500 100

Ch
2.22

471units

But 471 500


Get discount at least order should be500 units
Now total cost at Q2 500

2500
500
T .C
100
2.25 2500 9
500
2
Rs.23562.5

T .C EOQ500 T .C EOQ447

0.1

0 to 0.1

0.35

0.1 to 0.45

0.35

0.45 to 0.8

0.2

0.8 to 1

Table 1.7
The value of CPcomesbetween 0.45 to 0.8,
hence optimal stock level will be 4.

Let

Ch Rs.9 0.25 25.225 / unit / year

15. (B)
Expected value of lead time demand ( DLT ),
DLT 80 0.2 100 0.25 120 0.3 140 0.25
Reorder Level,

ROL 1.25 DLT


ROL 1.25 112 140

Since reorder level is 140, which is , which is


equal to maximum possible lead time demand.
Hence Reorder level is sufficient to fulfill lead
time demand. therefore service level will be 100
%.

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-21


16. (D)

17. (B)
p 1000/month
d 500/month

Q 1000
100

Maximum inventory,
d
1 Q
p

500

1
1000
1000

1.5 months

Figure 1.7

C0 Rs.100 / order
Ch Rs.10 / unit / month Rs.120 / unit / year

500

18. (B)

100
D
12 800 units / year
1.5

Ist
Ordering Holding
Ordering cost
cost
Quantity

Total
cost

Total
cost per
Unit

Maximum inventory

50

100

100

I m 100

65

100

30

130

2 min

Lot size,

85

100

90

190

2.235

Q I m 100

105

100

160

260

2.476

2nd
Ordering Holding
Ordering cost
cost
Quantity

Total
cost

Total
cost per
Unit

20

100

100

40

100

20

120

3 min

Cycle time,

tc 1.5month
Number of order per year

1
tc in year

12
tc in month

12
1.5

2nd ordered quantity 40

N 8

Annual cost neglecting material cost

N C0

Q
Ch
2

8 100

100
120
2

Rs.6800

1st ordered quantity = 65

Now, Total Cost=130+120=250


19. (C)
Reorder point = consumption Lead Time

2555
8
365

56

copyright reserved

1-22 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


20. (C)

22. (C)

D 10000 units / year

p 12000 / day

C0 Rs.300 / order

d 8000 / day

Purchase price C Rs.200 / unit

Ch Rs.0.2 / unit / month Rs.2.4 / unit / year

Ch Rs.40 / unit / year

D 300 8000 / year

EOQ
T.C

2C0 D
2 10000 300

387units
Ch
40

10000
387
300
40 200 10000
387
2

C0 Rs.500
E.O.Q Q*

2Co D
Ch

p
54772.255
pd

Rs.2015492

If 2% discount
At least order quantity is 1000
Q 1000

T .C

1000
1000
300
40 200 0.98 1000
1000
2

Rs.1983000
T=t1+t2

If 4% Discount

Figure 1.8

At least order quantity = 2000

Frequency of production run,

Q 2000

T .C

1000
2000
300
40 200 0.96 10000
2000
2

Rs.1961500

Total cost (T.C) is lowest for 4% Discount


So accept 4% discount
21. ( 50 )

2 DC0
Ch

2 100000 30
1.5

Q 2000

Number of orders per year

23.(76.996)
D = 2000 kg/year

EOQ Q

Q
D
54772.255

8000
6.8days

100000
2000

50 order / year

Cost price of rivet C = Rs. 25/kg


Ordering cost C0 = Rs. 100 / order
Carrying cost Ch Rs.25 0.09
Rs.2.25 / kg / year
And EOQ Q

2DF
C

2 2000 100
2.25

Q 421.63

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-23


Cycle length

EOQ Q

D
D

421.63
365
2000

Number of orders per year

D
0.5
EOQ

And
ordering cost per year 5 7000
Rs.35000 / year

76.94days

for EOQ model

24. (35000)

Carrying cost per year = ordering cost per year

D 5000 units / year

Rs.3500 / year

C0 Rs. 7000/order
EOQ = 10000 units

copyright reserved

1-24 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research

IES OBJECTIVE QUESTIONS


NOTE
For Assertion (A) and Reason(R) type questions use the following options,
Of these statements
(A) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(B) Both A and R are true but R is not a correct explanation of A
(C) A is true but R is false
(D) A is false but R is true

NUMERICAL
(IES 1994)

(IES 1992)
1.

Out of the following item listed below, which


two items you would consider under category
(C) under ABC analysis.

2.

There are two products A and B with the


following characteristics:

Product

Demand Order cost

Annual usage of items


Item
No.
A

(in Rs/order)

Annual usage Unit cost Rs.


1000
30
0.10

100

100

400

100

300

0.15

200.00

60

0.10

0.30

300

0.10

(A) 1 : 1

(B) 1 : 2

10

0.05

(C) 1 : 4

(D) 1 : 8

0.10

20

0.10

0.20

(A)B and F

(B) C and E

(C) E and J

(D) G and H

(in Rs/unit)

Table 1.8

Holding cost

Table 1.9
The economic order quantities (EOQ)
product A and B will be in the ratio of

of

(IES 1995)
3.

In inventory control theory, the economic order


quantity (EOQ) is
(A) Average level of inventory
(B) Optimum lot size
(C) Lot size corresponding to break even
analysis
(D) Capacity of a warehouse
copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-25


Codes :

(IES 1996)
4.

Given that, = procurement cost per order, D =


number of units demanded per year, H =
holding cost per unit per year, i = rate of
interest, P = purchase price per unit. The
procurement quantity per order (Q) is given by
(A) Q
(C) Q

2. .D
H ip

(B) Q

2D
H ip

(D) Q

2. .D
iH p

8.

2.
D H ip

(IES 1997)
5.

Annual demand for a product costing Rs. 100


per piece is Rs. 900. Ordering cost per order is
Rs. 100 inventory holding cost is Rs. 2 per unit
per year. The economic lot size is
(A) 200

(B) 300

(C) 400

(D) 500

(IES 1999)
6.

(B) 180

(C) 100

(D) 120

9.

10.

Match List I (Limits in normal distribution) with


List II (Population covered) and select the
correct answer using the codes given below the
lists:
List I

List-II

A. 3

1. 0.3413

B. 2

2. 0.6826

C. 1

3. 0.9973
4. 0.9545

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

A shop owner with an annual constant demand


of A units has ordering costs of Rs. P per
order and carrying costs Rs. I per unit per year.
The economic order quantity for a purchasing
model having no shortage may be determined
from
(A)

24P
AI

(B)

24AP
I

(C)

2AP
I

(D)

2AI
P

In the ABC method of inventory control, Group


A constitutes costly items. What is the usual
percentage of such items of the total items?
(A) 10 to 20 %

(B) 20 to 30%

(C) 30 to 40%

(D) 40 to 50%

(IES 2007)

(IES 2002)
7.

(IES 2006)

A dealer sells a radio set at Rs. 900 and makes


80% profit on his investment. If he can sell it at
Rs. 200 more, his profit as percentage of
investment will be
(A) 160

In the EOQ model, if the unit ordering cost is


doubled, the EOQ
(A) Is halved
(B) Is doubled
(C) Increases 1.414 times
(D) Decreases 1.414 times

11.

If the annual demand of an item becomes half,


ordering cost double, holding cost
onefourth and the unit cost twice, then what is the
ratio of the new EOQ and the earlier EOQ?
(A)

1
2

(C) 2

(B)

1
2

(D) 2

copyright reserved

1-26 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


(IES 2008)
12.

(IES 2011)

In the basic EOQ model, demand is 60 per


month, ordering cost is Rs. 12 per order holding
cost is Rs. 10 per unit permonth, what is the
EOQ ?
(A) 12

(B) 144

(C) 24

(D) 28

16.

(IES 2013)
17.

(IES 2009)
13.

At break- even point, inventory carrying cost is :


(A) Four times the preparatory cost

If demand is doubled and ordering cost, unit


cost and inventory carrying cost are halved,
then what will be the EOQ?

(B) Three times the preparatory cost

(A) Half
(C) Twice

(D) Equal to the preparatory cost

(B) Same
(D) Four times

(C) Two times the preparatory cost


18.

(IES 2010)
14.

When the ordering cost is increased to 4 times,


the EOQ will be increased to :
(A) 2 times
(B) 3 times
(C) 8 times
(D) Remain same

If,D = annual demand for a material (units per


year)

What is the ratio of annual order cost to annual


cost when the order size is determined using
economic order quantity (EOQ) model ?
(A) 0.5

(B) 0.25

(C) 0.75

(D) 1

Q = quantity of material ordered at each order


point (units per order)
C = Cost of carrying one unit in inventory for one
year (rupees per unit per year)

(IES 2014)
19.

S = average cost of completing an order for a


material (rupees per order)
TSC = total annual stocking costs for a material
(rupees per year)

What is the ratio of annual order cost to annual


carrying cost when the order size is determined
using Economic Order quantity (EOQ) model?
(A)0.5

(B)0.25

(C)0.75

(D)1

THEORETICAL

Then the economic order quantity (EOQ) is

15.

(A)

2DS
C

2DC
(B)
S

(C)

2DC
S

(D)

2DS
C

In the inventory control if the yearly demand


for a certain material is fixed, the economic
order quantity gives minimum of

(IES 1998)
20.

Which of the following cost elements are


considered while determining the Economic Lot
size for purchase?
1. Inventory carrying cost
2. Procurement cost
3. Set up cost

(B) Acquisition cost per year

Select the correct answer using the codes given


below:

(C) Total cost per year

(A) 1, 2 and 3

(B) 1 and 2

(D) Number of orders per year

(C) 2 and 3

(D) 1 and 3

(A) Inventory carrying cost per year

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-27


(IES 2007)

(IES 1999)
21.

Consider the following costs:

25.

1. Cost of inspection and return of goods

1.

2. Cost of obsolescence

3. Elimination of the possibility of duplicate


ordering.

4. Cost of insurance

Select the correct answer using the code given


below.

5. Cost of negotiation with suppliers


Which of these costs are related to inventory
carrying cost ?
(A) 1, 2 and 3

(B) 1, 3 and 4

(C) 2, 3 and 4

(D) 2, 4 and 5

26.

(C) 2 and 3 only

(D) 1 and 3 only

EOQ is taken at the point where the cost of


carrying equals the cost of

(C) The safety stock

(A) The value of annual usage of the items

(D) Both the material and the safety stock


27.

(C) Volume of material consumption

The following is the general policy for A class


items in ABC analysis :
1. Very strict control
2. Frequent review of their consumption
3. Safety stock kept
Which of the above statements is/are correct ?

(D) Quantity of materials used

(IES 2005)
In ABC analysis, A items require

(A) 1 only

(B) 1 and 2 only

(A) No safety stock

(C) 2 only

(D) 1, 2 and 3

(B) Low safety stock

(IES 2012)

(C) Moderate safety stock

28.

(D) High safety stock

(IES 2006)
24.

(B) 1 and 2 only

(A) Ordering the materials


(B) The material

ABC analysis in materials management is a


method of classifying the inventories based on

(B) Economic order quantity

(A) 1, 2 and 3

(IES 2010)

(IES 2003)

23.

Improvement in customers relationship

2. Economy in purchasing.

3. Cost of scrap

22.

Which of the following are the benefits of


inventory control ?

Which one of the


system the keeps
amount in storage
when it drops to a
fixed quantity?

following is an inventory
a running record of the
and replenishes the stock
certain level by ordering a

29.

In an economic order quantity based inventory


control, when re-order level is greater than
order quantity, the number of orders
outstanding at any time is
(A) Never more than one

(B)At least one

(C) No order outstanding

(D)One only

ABC analysis is useful because it


1. Identifies vital few and trivial many
2. Classifies items into three classes

(A) EOQ

(B)Periodic

(C) Peripheral

(D)ABC

(A)Neither 1 nor 2
(C) 1 only

(B) Both 1 and 2


(D) 2 only

copyright reserved

1-28 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


30.

In a quantity discount model of inventory


control, the relevant costs are

(A) Four times the preparatory cost


(B) Three times the preparatory cost

(A) Annual purchase cost

(C) Two times the preparatory cost

(B) Annual order cost and annual carrying cost


(C) Annual purchase cost, annual order cost
and annual carrying cost.

(D) Equal to the preparatory cost


34.

(A) Cleaning of inventories

(D) Annual order cost

(B) Disposing of inventories


(C) Processing of inventories

(IES 2013)
31.

(D) Storing of inventories in bins

Purification of inventory means:


(A) Cleaning of inventories

35.

(B) Inefficiency

(C) Processing of inventories

(C) Reliable control of vendors

(D) Storing of inventories in bins


Large size of inventory is a sign of :
(A) Better planning
(B) Inefficiency
(C) Reliable control of vendors
(D) Better scheduling

(IES 2014)
33.

At Economic Order Quantity, inventory


carrying cost is :

Large size of inventory is a sign of:


(A) Better planning

(B) Disposing of inventories

32.

Purification of inventory means :

(D) Better scheduling


36.

In ABC inventory control of spare parts, the


items A, B and C respectively refer to
(A) High stock-out cost, moderate stock-out
cost and low stock-out cost
(B) Low stock-out cost, moderate stock-out cost
and high stock-out cost
(C) Moderate stock-out cost, high stock-out cost
and low stock-out cost
(D) Stock-out costs whose sequence depends on
other factors also

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-29

ANSWER KEY
1
11
21
31

(D)
(D)
(C)
(B)

2
12
22
32

(C)
(A)
(A)
(B)

3
13
23
33

(B)
(NONE)
(B)
(D)

4
14
24
34

(C)
(A)
(A)
(B)

5
15
25
35

(B)
(C)
(B)
(B)

6
16
26
36

(D) 7 (A) 8 (C) 9 (A) 10 (C)


(A) 17 (D) 18 (A) 19 (D) 20 (D)
(A) 27 (A) 28 (B) 29 (D) 30 (C)
(A)

SOLUTION
NUMERICAL
1.(D)

4.(C)
Inventory carrying cost/ unit/ year =Holding
cost + Interest cost=H+ip

Annual consumption value of


Item A 30 0.10 3
Item B 300 0.15 45
Item F 300 0.1 30

EOQ

2D
H ip

EOQ

2DF
C

5. (B)

Item C 2 200 400


Item D 60 0.10 6

2 900 100
300
2

Item E 5 0.3 1.5


Item J 5 0.2 1.0
Item I 20 0.10 2

6. (D)
SP CP 1 r

Item G 10 0.05 0.5

900 x 1 0.8

Item H 7 0.1 0.7

x 500

Least consumption value items are G and H and


they come under C category.

New profit 1100 500 600

2. (C)

EOQ A
EOQ B

2 DF

C A

2 DF

C B

2 100 100
4

1: 4
2 400 100
1
3.(B)
EOQ is optimum lot size because at EOQ total
cost is minimum.

P 600

120%
I 500
7.(A)
8.(C)

EOQ

2 DF
2 AP

C
I

9. (A)
10. (C)

EOQ

2 DF
C

, F odering cost

EOQ ordering cos t

copyright reserved

1-30 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


11. (D)

Annual order cost

2DF
C

EOQ

EOQ1

For EOQ:

D
2F
EOQ1
2

2
C
EOQ
4

2 RCP
Q
R
CH CR EOQ
CH
2
Q

Where,
R is annual requirement
CP is preparation cost

12. (A)

2 DF
2 60 12

12 units
C
10

EOQ

CH is holding cost

THEORETICAL

13. (None)
20. (D)

2DF
EOQ1
C

EOQ 2
2

R
CR
Q

For EOQ

2 2D

Inventory carrying cost and set up cost are


considered and not Procurement cost except
discount model.

F
2

C
2

21. (C)

2 DF
2 EOQ1
C

22. (A)
ABCAnalysis is consumption Analysis.

14.(A)

Where Consumption= Quantity Cost per unit

2DS
EOQ
C

23. (B)
24. (A)

15. (C)

25. (B)

At EOQ
Ordering cost per year = Inventory Carrying
cost per year.
Total inventory cost is minimum.
16. (A)

26. (A)
At EOQ,
Orderingcost per year = Inventory Carrying
cost per year
27. (A)

EOQ F

28. (B)

17. (D)

29. (D)

18. (A)

30. (C)

19. (D)
At the optimal point, annual holding cost is
equal to annual order cost.
Annual holding cost

Q
CH
2

31. (B)
32. (B)
33.(D)
Inventory carrying cost is equal to the
preparatory cost at the Economic order quantity

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-31


35.(B)

To
tal

Large size of inventory is a sign of

Cost

1. Poor scheduling

y
tor ost
n
e
c
Inv ying
r
r
Ca

(TC)min

2. Inefficient planning
3. Vendors are not well-coordinated

Prep
arat
ion
Cost

36.(A)

EOQ
No. of Units
Figure 1.9
34.(B)
Purification of Inventory: The raw material of
particular specification is stored in the
inventory for particular products. If the design
of the products changes or method of
manufacturing changes, then some of the
inventory may become absolute and useless.

Item Quantity

Value/cost (stock out


cost)

Less

High

Moderate Moderate

High

Low
Figure 1.10

Getting the inventory cleared of those obsolete


items is purificationof the inventory.

copyright reserved

1-32 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research

IES CONVENTIONAL QUESTIONS


(IES 2002)
1.

Why do we need inventory? Explain why we


need to optimize the order quantity. The
demandfor a component is 10000 pieces per
year. The cost per item is Rs 50 and the interest
cost is1 % per month. The cost associated with
placing an order is Rs 240. What is the EOQ?

(IES 2012)
4.

(IES 2004)
2.

For xyz Company, the annual requirement of an


item is 2400 units. Each item costs the company
Rs. 6. The supplier offers a discount of 5% if 500
or more quantities are purchased. The ordering
cost is Rs. 32 per order and the average
inventory cost is 16%. Is it advisable to accept
the discount? Comment on the result.

Derive an expression for lot size that will


give minimum cost.

(ii)

What is the optimum lot size?

(iv) What will be the total cost per year if the


number of runs has to be an integer?

Name the three costs involved in inventory


control. A store procures and sells certain items.
Information about an item is as follows:

(i)

(iii) What is the number of runs required per


year?

(IES 2008)
3.

A unit manufactures 50,000 bottles of tomato


Ketchup in a year. The factory cost perbottle is
Rs. 6, the set-up cost per production run is
estimated to be Rs. 90 and thecarrying cost on
finished goods inventory are 20% of the cost per
annum. Productionrate is 600 bottles per day
and sales are expected at 150 bottles/day.

(IES 2014)
5.

What is ABC analysis?

Expected annual sales = 8000 units


Ordering cost = Rs. 1800 per order
Holding cost = 10% of average inventory value
The items can be purchased according to the
following schedule:
Lot Size

Unit Price (Rs)

1-999

220

1000-1499

200

1500-1999

190

2000 and above 185


Table1.11
Determine the best order size.

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-33

SOLUTION
1.

Reasons for keeping inventories

Given,

(i)

Demand = 10000unit/year

To stabilize production: The demand for


an item fluctuates because of the number
of factor e.g. seasonality, production
schedule etc. The inventories (raw material
and components) should be made
available to the production as per demand,
failing which results in stock out and the
production stoppage take place for want of
materials. Hence, the inventory is kept to
take care of this fluctuation so that the
production is smooth.

(ii) To take advantage of price discount :


Usually the manufactures offer discount
for bulk buying and to gain this price
advantage the material are brought in bulk
even though it is not required
immediately.
Thus,
inventory
is
maintained
to
gain
economy
in
purchasing.
(iii) To meet the demand during the
replenishment period: The lead time for
procurement of materials depend upon
factors like location of the source, demand
supply condition etc. So inventory is
maintained to meet the demand during the
procurement (replenishment) period.
(iv) To prevent loss of orders (Sales) : In this
competitive scenario, one has to meet the
delivery schedules at 100 percent service
level, means they cannot afford to miss the
delivery schedule which may result in loss
of sales.
(v)

To keep pace with changing market


conditions: The organization has to
anticipate the changing market sentiment
and they have to stock material in
anticipation of non-availability of materials
or sudden increase in price.

Ordering cost or set up cost F = Rs 240/order


Inventory carrying cost or holding cost C = 1%
of Rs 50/unit/month
C

1
50 12 Rs6 / item / year
100

EOQ

2 DF
2 10000 240

C
6

894.42 Components/procurement

2.

D = 2400 units, price per unit = Rs 6.0, Inventory


carrying cost C = 0.16 6 Rs0.96 , ordering cost
F = Rs 32

EOQ

2 DF
2 2400 32

C
0.96

Q* 400units

For EOQ, minimum inventory carrying cost is


Tcm 2DFC 2 2400 32 0.16 6

Tcm 384 Rs.


Total cost = Cost required in buying 2400 unit +
Inventory carrying cost

2400 6 384
14784 Rs.
Now the supplier offers a discount of 5% if
order is more than 500
Now, Total cost = Material cost + Carrying cost
+ Ordering cost
1

0.95 2400 6 500 0.16 6 0.95


2

2400

32
500
14061.6Rs.

Saving annually 14784 14061.6 Rs722.4


The discount is acceptable

copyright reserved

1-34 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


3.

Three cost involved in inventory control are :


(i)

Ordering cost

(ii)

Inventory carrying cost

D = total demand
Q

(iii) Unit cost


D 8000 unit

Qm

Ordering cost = 1800 per order

(P-r)

Inventory carrying cost= 0.1

C p Cost per unit


tp

Inventory carrying cost = I Cp = 0.1 Cp

T-Tb

Let EOQ lies between 1 and 999

Figure 1.10

Then, C p 220 Rs./unit


EOQ

Qm = max inventory level

Qm p r

2 DC0
2 8000 1800

Cp I
220 0.1

Therefore, it is not economical

Average inventory
p r Q Q p r Q
Q
m

av
2
2p
2p

Let, EOQ lies between 1000 and 1499

Total inventory cost TIC,

Then, C p 200

TIC = Setup cost + Holding cost

2 DC0
2 8000 1800
EOQ

Cp I
200 0.1

EOQ 1144.155 1144 unit

d TIC

Since, EOQ lies between 1000 and 1499

dQ

Therefore, the best order size 1200 units.


(i)

expression for lot size that will give


minimum cost

F = setup cast/cycle

0 And

(ii)

d 2 TIC
dQ 2

2 DF p

C pr

Economic lot size


2DF p

C pr

r = no. of item required per unit time or


demand rate

Q*

p = no. of part produced per unit time or


production rate

D 50,000bottles / yr.

T = production cycle time

C p r DF
0

2 p Q2

EOQ Q*

Let
C = holding cast/item per unit time

D
Q pr
F
C
Q
2 p

For TIC to be minimum

1200 unit

4.

Q
p

p 600 bottles / day


r 150 bottles / day

copyright reserved

Inventory Control | 1-35


F Rs.90 / setup

5.

C 0.2 6 Rs.1.2 / unit / year

ABC stands for Always Better Control. It focus on


classifying all the inventories items based on their
usage values. Items of high usage value but small in
number are classified as A items and would be
under strict control. C items are large in number
but requirelittle capital and would be under simple
control. Items of moderate value and size are
classified as B items and would attract reasonable
attention of the management. For example a TV set
has about 5 percent of its part contribute to 80
percent of the total costs. This is true for majority of
items like car, refrigerator etc

Q* 2 50,000

90
600

1.2 600 150

3162.28units

(iii) No. Of runs required

D
50,000

15.8runs
Q * 3162.28

(iv) If runs are to be integer i.e. = N = 16 then,

D
D
50000
Q Q
3125
Q
N
16

Total inventory cost,


TIC

D
Q pr
F
C
Q
2 p

TIC

50000 90 3125 600 150

(
)1.2
3125
2
600

2846.25

copyright reserved

1-36 | Industrial Engineering & Operation Research


NOTE

copyright reserved

GATEMENTOR was started by Mr. Arvind Rai, an alumnus of IIT Kharagpur, to provide a systematic coaching to
GATE aspirants. With just a few students in beginning we have grown to a premium institution with more and
more students selecting us as their success partner every year. Our methodology and the subject knowledge has
been our core strength. The results of our students every year is a proof of this fact. Our students are placed in
every IIT and PSU in the country.
The different programs provided by us for GATE and Public sector exams preparation, have been carefully
designed and developed over the years. The course material and various offline/online tests provided by us are
proven to be very helpful to the students.

1. CLASSROOM COACHING:
TWO YEAR CLASSROOM PROGRAMME: Keeping in view the increasing competition in GATE, this programme
has been developed which lasts for two years. The salient features of this program are:

The program is designed for 4th and 5th semester students. As it is a two year program, the students get
enough time to study each and every subject in detail and revise the syllabus.
This course is designed for preparation of GATE, UPSC Engineering Services Examination (IES) & Public
Sector Examinations such as DRDO, ISRO, SAIL etc.
The subjects are taught from the basic level to the advanced level. Different types of problems are solved in
the classroom.
High quality Study Material is provided during the Classroom Course with sufficient Theory, Practice Test
Papers &Previous Examinations solved papers for objective & conventional questions.
Regular tests are conducted to assess the performance in students. Real test environment is provided to the
students so that they can get used to the actual tests.
The students are provided online test series to get used to the online test environment which helps them to
perform better in the actual tests.
The students are given pre exam and post exam guidance so that they can select the best career path for
themselves.

ONE YEAR CLASSROOM PROGRAMME: This programme includes all the features of the two year classroom
program except the duration of the program which is one year.

The pace of the teaching is accordingly maintained so that students get maximum benefit in optimum time.
The batches are scheduled according to the convenience of the students.
The students are provided online test series to get used to the online test environment which helps them to
perform better in the actual tests.

2. ONLINE TEST SERIES:


GATEMENTOR provides a high quality Mock GATE test series at no cost to all the students. This programme is
developed keeping in mind the current test practices of GATE and other examinations which are now organized
online. The students need to practice giving online tests to get used to the idea and to avoid any type of surprises
during the actual tests. The salient features of this programme are:

The test series in designed to simulate the real GATE test environment. This means that the students will
feel like giving the actual GATE test. The test software, exam pattern, quality of questions is developed as
per the standard of the GATE exam.
The test includes both multiple choice questions and numerical answer type questions.
The test papers are developed by professors from reputed colleges/universities and GATE toppers. The
entire GATE syllabus is covered.
Virtual calculator is provided to the students which are integrated in the test software itself.
The students will get their test scores along with the detailed solution of the test right after submitting the
test. They will also know their all India ranking among the other students. This will help students to assess
themselves where they stand in the competition.

3. GATEMENTOR PUBLICATIONS:
There are a lot of books available in the market for students preparing for GATE. A student needs to carefully pick
the right book otherwise his efforts may go in vain. GATEMENTOR Publications has published a series of books, for
the Mechanical Engineering students, which are strategically designed to optimize the efforts of the students. Our
one book per subject concept has a very positive feedback among the students and the results are overwhelming.

4. CADMENTOR:
GATEMENTOR in association with DesignTech CAD Academy has recently started CAD and CAE training center
for mechanical engineers in order to empower students in the field of Mechanical Product Design and Analysis.
The intention behind starting this venture is to provide students with an alternative career choice.
Why CADMENTOR:
The unique thing about our center is that our trainers have experience working in R&D centers and
industries. No other CAD training institute has trainers which have any industrial experience.
We are the only CAD/CAE center to provide courses which are being used in Automobile or Aerospace
industries today. We dont teach old and obsolete software to our students.
We help our students in their final year projects also. Even after completing the course, if a student needs
help in their project work in future, we do it without any extra fees.
We provide placement assistance to all our students.
We only provide training in licensed software.

5. GATEMENTOR YOUTUBE CHANNEL: GATEMENTOR has its own YouTube channel. Students can watch
lectures on various subjects and topics which will help them understand the topic more effectively. The unique
thing about these video lectures is that they are all in Hindi which is why they are easy to understand and are so
popular among the students.

Class Room Coaching


For GATE (Mechanical)

Mock GATE
Online Test Series

GATEMENTOR Publications

Free Download
CADMENTOR
CAD/CAE Training

GATEMENTOR
Website

GATEMENTOR
YouTube Channel

Corporate Office : Plot No. A-213, Street No.-27, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, Durg (Chhattisgarh) - 490006
Phone - 0788-6499334, 4062366 Website - www.gatementor.co.in Email - info@igatementor.org

You might also like