Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department Of Justice
National Prosecution Service
MANUAL
FOR
PROSECUTORS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. PROSECUTION OF OFFENSES
10
19
40
PART V. BAIL
44
49
50
51
55
SECTION 1. Criminal action - A criminal action is one by which the state
prosecutes a person for an act or omission punishable by law.1
SEC. 2. How and where commenced - A criminal action is commenced by
the filing of a complaint with the City/Provincial Prosecution Office or with the
Municipal Trial Court or Municipal Circuit Trial Court. However, a criminal
action for an offense committed within Metro Manila, may be commenced only by
the filing of the complaint with the Prosecutor's Office.
SEC. 3. Complaint. - A complaint is a sworn written statement charging a
person with an offense and subscribed by the offended party, any peace officer or
public officer charged with the enforcement of the law violated.2
To discourage the filing of harassment charges, the prosecutor shall warn the
complainant that any false statement in the complaint may give rise to a finding of
a prima facie case for perjury before the same office.
4. Offended party, defined. - The offended party is the person against whom
or against whose property the crime was committed.3
Sec. 3, Rule 110, Rules on Criminal Procedure; Example of public officer charged with the enforcement of the law
violated: (1) Bureau of Customs officials for violation of the customs law; (2) Bureau of Forest Development officials
for violation of forestry laws; (3) Chief of Police of a municipality for violation of a municipal ordinance which
constitutes a criminal offense.
The sworn complaint referred to usually refers to a complaint filed in court and not in the prosecutor's office. It is not
necessary to file a sworn complaint with the prosecutor before the latter can conduct a preliminary investigation. A
mere unsworn letter suffices to start an investigation, except if the offense charged is one which cannot be
prosecuted de officio or is private in nature i.e., where the law requires that it be started by a complaint sworn to by
the offended party.
In a case involving a private offense, the phrase "complaint filed by the offended party" as used in Section 5, Rule
110 should be given a liberal or loose interpretation, meaning a "charge, allegation, grievance or accusation" rather
than a strict construction for often than not the offended party who files it is unschooled in law. The purpose of the
complaint in Section 5, Rule 110, is merely to initiate or commence the prosecution of the accused. Thus, the
"Sinumpaang Salaysay" of the victim of a private offense is already deemed a complaint" required in the aforesaid
Sec. 5. (People vs. Sangil, 208 SCRA 696 [1992]).
3
SEC. 6. Sufficiency of complaint or information. - A complaint or
information shall be considered sufficient if it states a. The name of the accused;
b. The designation of the offense committed;
c. The act or omission complained of;
d. The name of the offended party;
e. The approximate time of the commission of the offense; and
f. The place where the offense was committed.
SEC. 7. Other essential matters to be alleged in complaint or
information. - The following shall also be alleged in a complaint or information:
a. Every essential element of the offense;
b. The criminal intent of the accused and its relation to the act or omission
complained of;
c. All qualifying and generic aggravating circumstances which are integral parts
of the offense;
d. All matters that are essential to the constitution of the offense, such as the
ownership and/or value of the property robbed or destroyed; the
Sec. 8, ibid.
Sec. 9, ibid.
of the ingredients thereof occurred at some place within the jurisdiction of the
court, unless the particular place in which the crime was committed is an essential element of
the crime e.g. in a prosecution for violation of the provision of the Election Code
which punishes the carrying of a deadly weapon in a "polling place", or if it is
necessary to identify the offense charged e.g., the domicile in the offense of "violation
of domicile."7
SEC. 13. Time of commission of offense. - The precise time of the
commission of the offense shall be stated in the complaint or information if time is
a material ingredient of the offense e.g., treason, infanticide. Otherwise, it is
sufficient that it be alleged that the offense was committed at any time as near to
the actual date at which the offense was committed.8
SEC. 14. Title of complaint or information. - The title of the complaint or
information shall be in the name of the "People of the Philippines" as Plaintiff
against all persons who appear to be responsible for the offense involved.9
SEC. 15. Contents of caption of an information. - The caption of an
information shall, in addition to the name of the Plaintiff, indicate the following:
a.The complete names i.e., given name, maternal name, surname, and
addresses, of all the accused. In the case of accused minors, their age shall
be indicated in the caption;
b.The case number; and
c. The offense charged. The denomination of the offense and the specific law
and provision violated shall be specified.
SEC. 16. List of prosecution witnesses. - The information shall contain the
complete names and addresses of all identified witnesses for the prosecution. In
cases for violation of B.P. Blg. 22 and Estafa cases, the list of witnesses shall include
the complainant, the bank representative with specific reference to the check and
7
Sec. 2, ibid.
account numbers involved and in the proper cases, the company auditor; and in
physical injuries cases, the attending physician with specific reference to the
medical report and date of the incident.
10
11
Sec. 13, ibid; " Penalty for complex crimes. - When a single act constitutes two or more grave or less grave
felonies, or when an offense is a necessary means for committing the other, the penalty for the most serious crime
shall be imposed, the same to be applied in its maximum period". (Art. 48, Revised Penal Code).
"When mistake has been made in charging the proper offense. - When it becomes manifest at any time before
judgment, that a mistake has been made in charging the proper offense, and the accused cannot be convicted of
the offense charged, or of any offense necessarily included therein, the accused shall not be discharged, if there
appears to be good cause to detain him. In such case, the court shall commit the accused to answer for the
proper offense and dismiss the original case upon the filing of the proper information."
12
information can be used after the amendment is made and any evidence that the
accused may have would be equally applicable to the one form as in the other.
A mistake in substance is any omission or misstatement which prevents an
information from showing on its face that an offense has been committed, or from
showing what offense is intended to be charged.13
14
15
16
Ibid.
17
Ibid.
18
interrupted only by the filing of the complaint or information in court and shall
begin to run again if the proceedings are dismissed for reasons not constituting
double jeopardy.19
Prescription shall not run when the offender is absent from the
country.21
In cases where the imposable penalty is imprisonment and/or a fine, the greater
penalty shall be the basis for the computation of prescription.
PART II. INQUEST22
19
20
21
22
a.
b.
23
a.
b.
12 Hours for light offenses; 18 hours for less grave offenses; and 36 hours for grave offenses.
c.
Theft and Robbery, Violation of the Anti-Piracy and Anti-Highway Robbery Law (P.D. No.532)
and Violation of the Anti-Fencing Law (P.D. No.1612)
Rape, Seduction and Forcible Abduction with Rape
a. The medico-legal report (living case report), if the victim submitted herself
for medical or physical examination.
Violation of the Anti-Carnapping Law (R.A. No.6539)
a. Scale sheets containing the volume and species of the forest products
confiscated, number of pieces and other important details such as
estimated value of the products confiscated;
b. Certification of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources/
Bureau Of Forest Management; and
c. Seizure receipt.
The submission of the foregoing documents shall not be absolutely required
if there are other forms of evidence submitted which will sufficiently establish the
facts sought to be proved by the foregoing documents.
Otherwise, the Inquest Officer shall order the release of the detained person25 and,
where the inquest is conducted outside of office hours, direct the law enforcement
agency concerned to file the case with the City or Provincial Prosecutor for
appropriate action.
24
25
SEC. 7. Charges and counter-charges. - All charges and counter-charges
arising from the same incident shall, as far as practicable, be consolidated and
inquested jointly to avoid contradictory or inconsistent dispositions.
SEC. 8. Initial duty of Inquest Officer. - The Inquest Officer shall first
determine if the arrest of the detained person was made in accordance
with paragraphs (a) and (b) of Section 5, Rule 113 of the 1985 Rules on Criminal
Procedure, as amended, which provide that arrests without a warrant may be
effected:26
a. When, in the presence of the arresting officer, the person to be arrested has
committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense;
or
b. When an offense has in fact just been committed, and the arresting officer
has personal knowledge of facts indicating that the person to be arrested
has committed it.
For this purpose, the Inquest Officer may summarily examine the arresting
officers on the circumstances surrounding the arrest or apprehension of the
detained person.
26
Go vs. Court of Appeals, 206 SCRA 138 [1992]; Umil, et.al. vs. Ramos, 202 SCRA 251 [1991] and companion
cases People vs. Malmstedt, 198 SCRA 401 and People vs. Aminudin, 163 SCRA 402 [1988].
SEC. 9. Where arrest not properly effected. - Should the Inquest Officer
find that the arrest was not made in accordance with the Rules, he shall:
a. Recommend the release of the person arrested or detained;
b. Note down the disposition on the referral document;
c. Prepare a brief memorandum indicating the reasons for the action taken;
and
d. Forward the same, together with the record of the case, to the City or
Provincial Prosecutor for appropriate action.
Where the recommendation for the release of the detained person is
approved by the City or Provincial Prosecutor but the evidence on hand
warrants the conduct of a regular preliminary investigation, the order of
release shall be served on the officer having custody of said detainee and shall
direct the said officer to serve upon the detainee the subpoena or notice of
preliminary investigation, together with the copies of the charge sheet or
complaint, affidavits or sworn statements of the complainant and his witnesses and
other supporting evidence.27
SEC. 10. Where arrest properly effected. - Should the inquest Officer find
that the arrest was properly effected, the detained person shall be asked if he
desires to avail himself of a preliminary investigation and, if he does, he
shall be made to execute a waiver of the provisions of Article 125 of the
Revised Penal Code, as amended28, with the assistance of a lawyer and, in case
of non-availability of a lawyer, a responsible person of his choice.29 The
preliminary investigation may be conducted by the Inquest Officer himself or by
any other Assistant Prosecutor to whom the case may be assigned by the City or
Provincial Prosecutor, which investigation shall be terminated within fifteen
(15) days from its inception.
SEC. 11. Inquest proper. - Where the detained person does not opt for a
preliminary investigation or otherwise refuses to execute the required waiver,
27
28
29
Such responsible person may be a parent, elder brother or sister, spouse, the municipal mayor, the municipal
judge, district school supervisor, or priest/minister of the gospel as chosen by him (Sec. 2 (d) RA 7438, An Act
Defining Rights of Person Arrested, Detained or under Custodial Investigation)
the Inquest Officer shall proceed with the inquest by examining the sworn
statements/affidavits of the complainant and the witnesses and other supporting
evidence submitted to him.
If necessary, the Inquest Officer shall require the presence of the complaining
witnesses and subject them to an informal and summary investigation or
examination for purposes of determining the existence of probable cause.
SEC. 12. Meaning of probable cause. - Probable cause exists when the
evidence submitted to the Inquest Officer engenders a well-founded belief that a
crime has been committed and that the arrested or detained person is probably
guilty thereof.
SEC. 13. Presence of probable cause. - If the Inquest Officer finds that
probable cause exists, he shall forthwith prepare the corresponding
complaint/information with the recommendation that the same be filed in
court. The complaint/information shall indicate the offense committed and the
amount of bail recommended, if bailable.
Thereafter, the record of the case, together with the prepared complaint/
information, shall be forwarded to the City or Provincial Prosecutor for
appropriate action.
The complaint/information may be filed by the Inquest Officer himself
or by any other Assistant Prosecutor to whom the case may be assigned
by the City or Provincial Prosecutor.
SEC. 14. Contents of Information. - The information shall, among others,
contain:
a. A certification by the filing Prosecutor that he is filing the same in
accordance with the provisions of Section 7, Rule 112, Rules on
Criminal Procedure, in cases cognizable by the Regional Trial Court30
b. The full name and aliases, if any, and address of the accused;
c. The place where the accused is actually detained;
d. The full names and addresses of the complainant and witnesses;
30
SEC. 16. Presence at crime scene. - Whenever a dead body is found and
there is reason to believe that the death resulted from foul play, or from the
unlawful acts or omissions of other persons and such fact has been brought to his
attention, the Inquest Officer shall:
a. Forthwith proceed to the crime scene or place of discovery of the dead
person;
31NPS
Form No.4.
b. Cause an immediate autopsy to be conducted by the appropriate medicolegal officer in the locality or the PNP Medico-Legal Division or the NBI
Medico-Legal office, as the case may be;
c. Direct the police investigator to cause the taking of photographs of the
crime scene or place of discovery of the dead body;
d. Supervise the investigation to be conducted by the police authorities as well
as the recovery of all articles and pieces of evidence found thereat and
see to it that the same are safeguarded and the chain of the custody
thereof properly recorded; and
e. Submit a written report of his finding to the city or provincial prosecutor for
appropriate action.
SEC. 18. Recovered articles. - The Inquest Officer shall see to it that all
articles recovered by the police at the time of the arrest or apprehension of the
detained person are physically inventoried, checked and accounted for with the
issuance of corresponding receipts by the police officer/investigator concerned.
The said articles must be properly deposited with the police evidence custodian
and not with the police investigator.
The Inquest Officer shall ensure that the items recovered are duly safeguarded
and the chain of custody is properly recorded.
SEC. 19. Release of recovered articles. - The Inquest Officer shall, with the
prior approval of the City or Provincial Prosecutor or his duly authorized
representative, order the release32 of recovered articles to their lawful owner or
32
33
b. The person requesting the release of said articles is shown to be the lawful
owner or possessor thereof;
c. The requesting party undertakes under oath to produce said articles before
the court when so required;
d. The requesting party, if he is a material witness to the case, affirms or
reaffirms his statement concerning the case and undertakes under oath to
appear and testify before the court when so required;
e. The said articles are not the instruments, or tools in the commission of the
offense charged nor the proceeds thereof; and
f. Photographs of said articles are first taken and duly certified to by the
g. Police evidence custodian as accurately representing the evidence in his
custody.
SEC. 2. Purpose of preliminary investigation. - A preliminary
investigation is intended:
a.
b.
35
36
People vs. Poculan, 167 SCRA 176 [1988]; Rodis, Sr. vs. Sandiganbayan, Second Division, 166 SCRA 618
[19881; Salonga vs. Pano, 134 SCRA 438 [1985]; Trocio vs. Manta, 118 SCRA 241 [1982]; Sausi vs. Querubin, 62
SCRA 155 [1975]; and Hashim vs. Boncan, 71 Phil. 216 [1941].
37
charge is not related to the crime originally charged; if there is a change in the
nature of the crime charged; or if the information on its face is null and void for
lack of authority to file the same.
38
39
b.
c.
40
41Ebarle
d.
e.
SEC. 8. Complaint. - For purposes of preliminary investigation, the complaint
filed with the prosecutor's office shall, as far as practicable, be accompanied or
covered by an Information Sheet (I.S.) and shall state, among others -
a.
The full and complete names and exact home, office or postal
addresses of the complainant and his witnesses;
b.
The full and complete name and exact home, office or postal address
of the respondent;
c.
The offense charged and the place and exact date and time of its
commission; and
d.
Whether or not there exists a related case and, if so, the docket
number of said case and the name of the investigating prosecutor
thereof.
43
SEC. 10. Number of copies of affidavits. - The complaint and supporting
affidavits shall be in such number of copies as there are respondents, plus four (4)
copies for the court/official file.
Where a complaint charges multiple offenses which cannot be the subject of
one indictment or information, the complainant may be required to submit such
additional copies of the complaint and supporting affidavits as there are offenses
charged in the complaint.
44
See Appendix "0", List of Offenses cognizable by the Lupong Tagapamayapa (Crimes Covered by the Katarungang
Pambarangay).
45
SEC. 13. Initial action on the Complaint. - Within ten (10) days after the filing
of the complaint, the Investigating Prosecutor shall either dismiss the same if he
finds no ground to continue with the inquiry, or issue a subpoena to the
respondent, attaching thereto a copy of the complaint together with the affidavits
of witnesses and other supporting documents. 46
b. That, at the time of the filing of the complaint, the offense charged therein
had already prescribed;
c. That the complainant is not authorized under the provisions of
pertinent laws to file the complaint;
d. That the acts and/or omissions alleged in the complaint and/or the
supporting affidavits do not sufficiently show that a criminal offense or
violation of a penal law has been committed; or
e. That the complaint and the supporting affidavits are unsigned and/or have
not been duly subscribed and sworn to as prescribed under the
Rules on Criminal Procedure.
SEC. 15. Personal service of documents by investigating prosecutor. Whenever circumstances warrant and to prevent the loss of documents in the
course of the service of a subpoena through ordinary modes, the Investigating
Prosecutor may require the respondent or other parties to appear before him on a
designated date, time and place and then and there personally furnish them with
copies of the complaint, supporting affidavits and other documents.
At the said or any other setting, the respondent shall have the right to examine
all other evidence submitted by the complainant.
Failure on the part of the respondent or his counsel/representative to appear
before the Investigating Prosecutor to obtain copies of the complaint, supporting
affidavits and other documents despite receipt of notice or subpoena shall be
46
47
ii.
iii.
The typewritten/printed request: "If not claimed within five (5) days from first
notice, please return to sender."
SEC. 19. Motion for dismissal of bill of particulars. -The filing of a motion
for the dismissal of the complaint or for the submission of a bill of particulars shall
not suspend or interrupt the running of the period for the submission of counteraffidavits and other supporting documents.
48
Sec 3(d), Rule 112, Rules on Criminal Procedure; Department of Justice Memorandum Circular No.25 dated 2
October 1989.
49
50
All the grounds for the dismissal of the complaint, as well as objections to the
sufficiency thereof, shall be alleged or incorporated in the counter-affidavit and
shall be resolved by the Investigating Prosecutor jointly on the merits of the case.
The Investigating Prosecutor may grant a motion to dismiss filed by a
respondent who is yet to file or has not filed his counter-affidavit if the said motion
is verified and satisfactorily establishes, among others:
a. The circumstances specified in sub-paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of
Section 14 of this Part;
b. The fact that the complaint, or one similar thereto or identical therewith, has
previously been filed with the Office and has been fully adjudicated upon
on the merits after due preliminary investigation proceedings; or
c. Cases involving common parties and founded on factual and/or legal issues
of the same or similar character.
SEC. 24. Elements of prejudicial question. - The essential elements of a
prejudicial question are:
a. The civil action involves an issue similar or intimately related to the
issue raised in the criminal action;
b. The resolution of such issue determines whether or not the criminal action
may proceed;54 and
51
52
Ras vs. Rasul, 100 SCRA 125 [1980]; Quiambao vs. Osono, G. R. No.48157, March 16, 1988; and Appendix P
53
Donato vs. Luna, G.R. No.53642, April 15, 1988; Prado vs. People, 133 SCRA 602 [1984]; and Librodo vs.
Coscolluela, Jr., 116 SCRA 303 [1982].
54Sec.
The Investigating Prosecutor shall make a record of the questions asked and,,
answers given during the clarificatory questioning which shall be signed by the
parties concerned and/or their respective counsel. Said notes shall form part
of the official records of the case. Parties who desire to file a petition for
review of the Investigating Officer's resolution may, at their option, cite specific
portions of the oral testimony by reference to the transcript of
55
56
SEC. 29. Lack of probable cause. - If the Investigating Prosecutor does not
find sufficient basis for the prosecution of the respondent, he shall prepare the
resolution recommending the dismissal of the complaint.
58
59
c. The motion sufficiently and satisfactorily shows valid and justifiable reason
for the failure of the movant to submit the new and/or additional
evidence during the preliminary investigation proceedings.
SEC. 32. Cases Transmitted by the Municipal Trial Judge. - Upon receipt
of the records of the case from the Municipal Trial Court or Municipal Circuit
Trial Court which conducted the Preliminary Investigation, the Prosecution Office
shall review the case based on the existing records, without requesting the parties to
submit memorandum of authorities60 and may affirm, modify or reverse the
finding of the Municipal Trial Court judge. However, if the interest of justice so
requires, the prosecutor may conduct a full blown reinvestigation giving the parties
the opportunity to submit additional evidence, and thereafter, resolve the case on
the basis of the totality of the evidence thus adduced.
SEC. 33. Memoranda. - The Investigating Prosecutor shall not require nor
allow the filing or submission by the parties of memoranda unless the case involves
difficult or complicated questions of law or of fact. In any event, the filing of
memoranda by the parties shall be done simultaneously and the period therefore
shall not exceed ten (10) days, unless a longer period is authorized by the Provincial/City
Prosecutor concerned.
SEC. 34. Period for resolving a case. - The Investigating Prosecutor shall
resolve the case within ten (10) days from the time the case is deemed
submitted for resolution,61unless otherwise provided herein or a longer period is authorized by
the Provincial/City Prosecutor concerned.
SEC. 35. Form of resolution and number of copies. - The resolution shall
be written in the official language, personally and directly prepared and signed by
60 Department
61
SEC. 36. Contents of the resolution. - A resolution shall contain a caption
and a body.
SEC. 37. Caption of resolution. - The caption of the resolution shall indicate
the:
a. Names of all the complainants and all of the respondents;
b. Case number, otherwise known as the investigation slip number or I.S. No.;
c. The offense charged;
d. The date of the filing of the complaint with the office;
e. The date of the assignment of the case to or receipt of the case record by
the Investigating Officer; and
SEC. 38. Names of parties. - The complete names of all the complainants and
respondents in the case shall be set out in the caption of the resolution. It is not
proper to use the phrase "et. al." to refer to other complainants and respondents.
The name of the victim or injured party, not their representative, shall appear in the caption. In
cases referred to the prosecution by the police where there is no identified victim, as
in prohibited drugs cases, the complainant shall be the police station involved,
followed by the name and designation of the police officer representing the police
station. In homicide or murder cases, the name of the victim or of the complainant
shall be in the caption. The heirs or relatives of the slain victim shall be indicated
as "Legal heirs of deceased (name or person killed)", represented by "(either the
surviving spouse, father or mother)".
In the case of a corporation or judicial entity, its corporate name or identity
shall be indicated and written as follows. " 'X' Corporation, represented by its
(position title), (name of corporate officer)".
SEC. 39. Case number. - The number of a case shall indicate the year and
month; it was filed and its entry number in the log book of the office, e.g. 97
(year)A (month)-024 (entry number).
SEC. 40. Designation of offense charged. - For offenses that are punishable
under the Revised Penal Code, the caption shall set forth the denomination of the
offense and the specific article and paragraph of the statute violated.
Where there is another charge or countercharge in the same case having one
case number or in case of a consolidated resolution involving two or more criminal
cases with two or more docket numbers, the caption shall also contain said
information.
SEC. 41. Contents of body of resolution. - In general, the body of resolution
should contain:
a. A brief summary of the facts of the case;
b. A concise statement of the issues involved; and
c. The findings and recommendations of the investigating prosecutor.
d. All material details that should be found in the information prepared by the
Investigating Prosecutor shall be stated in the resolution.
c. Part 3 shall allege the respondent's version of the incident. This must also
be concise.
d. Part 4 shall contain the discussion, analysis and evaluation by the prosecutor
of the evidence presented by the complainant and the respondent,
without relying on the weakness of the defense of the respondent. It shall
also contain the conclusion of the prosecutor. The complainant's and
respondent's versions of the incident need not be repeated in this part
except to point out excerpts relating to the existence or absence of the
elements of the crime. Citations of pertinent laws and jurisprudence
should support the conclusions reached. Where numerical values are
important, the number shall be written in words and figures.
SEC. 43. How recommended bail is written. - The bail recommended in the
resolution shall be written in words and figures.
SEC. 44. Recommended bail. - The bail recommended in the resolution shall
be stated in the information, written in words and figures, and initialed by the
investigating prosecutor.
62
SEC. 47. Records of the case. - The investigating fiscal shall forward his
resolution, together with the complete records of the case, to the Provincial or City
Prosecutor or Chief State Prosecutor concerned within five (5) days from the
date of his resolution.63
63
complaint or information with the prior authority and approval of the Provincial/
City Prosecutor concerned.64
c. Registered mail with return card to the respondent, and by ordinary mail to
the complainant, if the resolution is for the indictment of the respondent.
64
65
Lim V. Felix, G. R. No.94054-57, and Fernandez V. Felix, G.R. No.94266-57, 194 SCRA 292 [1991]; See also
Allado V. Diokno, 232 SCRA 192 [1994].
66
67
CITY/PROVINCIAL !
MR <10>
REGIONAL STATE !
if less than prision
correccional
CHIEF STATE !
on any case it decides to take
cognizance of
NOT appealable
SECTION 1. Subject of petition for review. - Only resolutions of the
Chief State Prosecutor/Regional State Prosecutor/Provincial or City Prosecutor
dismissing a criminal complaint may be the subject of a Petition for Review to the
Secretary of Justice except as otherwise provided in Section 4 hereof.
A petition from the resolution of a Provincial/City Prosecutor where the
penalty prescribed for the offense charged does not exceed prision
correccional, regardless of the imposable fine, shall be made to the Regional
State Prosecutor who shall resolve the petitions with finality. Such petitions
shall also be governed by these rules.
The provision of the preceding paragraph on the finality of the resolution of
the Regional State Prosecutor notwithstanding, the Secretary of Justice may, in
the interest of justice and pursuant to his residual authority of supervision and
control over the prosecutors of the Department of Justice, order the automatic
68
Department Order No.223 dated June 30,1993 as amended by DO No.359 dated October 17, 1995.
review by his office of the resolution of the Regional State Prosecutors in the cases
appealed to the latter.
SEC. 2. Period to file petition. - The petition must be filed within a period
of fifteen (15) days from receipt of the questioned resolution by the party or his
counsel. The period shall be interrupted only by the filing of a motion for
reconsideration within ten (10) days from receipt of the resolution and shall
continue to run from the time the resolution denying the motion shall have been
received by the movant or his counsel.
SEC. 7. Motion for reinvestigation. - At any time after the filing of the
petition and before its resolution, the petitioner may, with leave of court, file a
motion for reinvestigation on the ground that new and material evidence has been
discovered which petitioner could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered
during the preliminary investigation and which if produced and admitted would
probably change the resolution. The Department or the Regional State Prosecutor,
as the case may be, shall then issue a resolution directing the reinvestigation of the
case, if still legally feasible. When reinvestigation is granted, it shall take place in
the Office of the Prosecutor from which the petition was taken.
SEC. 9. Motion for Reconsideration. - The aggrieved party may file a motion
for reconsideration within a non-extendible period of ten (10) days from receipt
of the resolution on the petition, furnishing the adverse party or his counsel and
the prosecutor with copies thereof. No second motion for reconsideration shall be
entertained.
SEC. 10. Effect of filing of petition. - A petition for review, motion for
reconsideration/reinvestigation from a resolution finding probable cause shall not
hold the filing of the information in court.
Pending resolution of the Petition for review, the accused is entitled to a
suspension of the proceedings, to the holding in abeyance of the issuance of
warrant of arrest, and deferment of the arraignment.69
69
Like a motion for reconsideration of the resolution of the City/Provincial Prosecutor, the right to a petition for review
is a part of due process. Notwithstanding the ruling in Crespo vs. Mogul (151 SCRA 463 [1987]), the Court may not
proceed with the criminal proceedings until after the resolution of the Regional Prosecutor or of the Secretary of
Justice shall have become final, and the corresponding motion has been filed in Court by the trial prosecutor to
withdraw or dismiss the information or to proceed with the trial as the case may be, per findings in the petition for
review. (See Roberts; Jr. et al. vs. C.A. et al., 254 SCRA 307 [1996]).
PART V. BAIL70
SECTION 1. Bail defined. - Bail is the security given for the release of a
person in custody of the law, furnished by him or a bondsman, conditioned upon
his appearance before any court as required under the conditions hereinafter
specified. Bail may be given in the form of corporate surety, property bond, cash
deposit, or recognizance.
70
Rule 114, Rules on Criminal Procedure, as amended by Supreme Court Administrative Circular No.12-94 dated
August 16, 1994.
71
g. The fact that respondent/accused under detention was a fugitive from justice
when apprehended; and
h. Other factors affecting the probability of the accused appearing at the trial.72
When a person has been in custody for a period equal to or more than the
possible maximum imprisonment of the offense charged to which he may be
sentenced, he shall be released immediately without prejudice to the continuation
of the trial thereof or the proceedings on appeal. In case the maximum penalty to
which the accused may be sentenced is destierro, he shall be released after thirty (30)
days of preventive imprisonment.
A person in custody for a period equal to or more than the minimum of
the principal penalty prescribed for the offense charged without application of the
Indeterminate Sentence Law or any modifying circumstance shall be released on a
reduced bail or on his own recognizance, at the discretion of the court.
72
73
Sec. 6, Rule 114, supra; Department of Justice Circular No.4, series of 1996, effective 1 February 1996.
See RA 6036 and Rules on Summary Procedure; Art. 29, Revised Penal Code; BP BIg 85 [1980]; Sec. 13, Rule
114, ibid.
SEC. 9. Cancellation of bail bond. - Upon application filed with the court
and after due notice to the prosecutor, the bail bond may be canceled upon
surrender of the accused or proof of his death.
The bail bond shall be deemed automatically canceled upon acquittal of the
accused or dismissal of the case or execution of the final judgment of conviction.
In all instances, the cancellation shall be without prejudice to any liability on
the bond.
SEC. 10. Arrest of accused out on bail. - For the purpose of surrendering
the accused, the bondsmen may arrest him, or on written authority endorsed on a
certified copy of the undertaking may cause him to be arrested by any police
officer or any other person of suitable age and discretion.
An accused released on bail may be re-arrested without the necessity of a
warrant if he attempts to depart from the Philippines without prior permission of
the court where the case is pending.
SEC. 11. No bail after final judgment, exception. - An accused shall not
be allowed bail after the judgment has become final, unless he has applied for
probation before commencing to serve sentence, the penalty and the offense being
within the purview of the Probation Law. In case the accused has applied for
probation, he may be allowed temporary liberty under his bail bond, but if no bail
was filed or the accused is incapable of filing one, the court may allow his release
on recognizance under the custody of a responsible member of the community. In
no case shall bail be allowed after the accused has commenced to serve sentence.
SEC. 13. Petition for bail in a continuous trial. - In case a petition for bail
is filed by the accused and the court orders a continuous trial of the case, the public
prosecutor shall be prepared with his principal witnesses. Where there are several
accused and one or two filed a petition to bail, the trial prosecutor shall, before the
presentation of his first witness, manifest in open court that the evidence to be
presented in the hearing of the petition for bail shall be adopted as its evidence-inchief.
74
Bernas, The Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, a Commentary, Vol. I, First Ed., 1987, pp.86-87 cited in
Department Circular No.24, dated March 24 1995.
75
Before the arraignment of the accused, the trial prosecutor shall examine the
information vis-a-vis the resolution of the investigating prosecutor in order
to make the necessary corrections or revisions and to ensure that the
information is sufficient in form and substance.
b.
After arraignment, the trial prosecutor shall prepare his witnesses for trial.
Government witnesses, e.g. medico-legal officer, chemists, forensic experts,
examiners etc. should, as much as practicable, be presented in accordance
with the logical and chronological sequence of the technical aspects to be
proved.
SEC. 4. Concept of Plea. - The plea is the reply of the accused to the charge. It
raises the issue to be tried and on which the judgment/sentence of the court can be
properly based.
The prosecutor shall enter into a pre-trial only when the accused and
counsel agree and upon order of the court.
76
77
78
ibid, p.1037.
SEC. 4. Plea of Guilty to a Lesser Offense. - The following rules shall apply
to cases where the accused pleads guilty to a lesser offense:
a. The Trial Prosecutor shall immediately move for the suspension of the
proceedings whenever the accused manifests his intention in court to
plead guilty to a lesser offense. This will enable the Trial Prosecutor to
evaluate the implications of the offer.
b. If the lesser offense to which the accused will plead guilty is not a
capital offense, the Trial Prosecutor may dispense with the
presentation of evidence unless the court directs otherwise.
c. The Trial Prosecutor, with the consent of the offended party, may motu
proprio agree to the offer of the accused to plead guilty to a lesser offense
if the penalty imposable therefor is prision correccional (maximum of six
[61 years) or less or a fine not exceeding P12,000.00.
d. When the penalty imposable for the offense charged is prision mayor (at
least six [6] years and one [1] day or higher) or a fine exceeding P12,000.00,
the Trial Prosecutor shall first submit his comment/
recommendation to the City or Provincial Prosecutor or to the Chief
State Prosecutor, as the case may be, for approval. If the
recommendation is approved in writing, the Trial Prosecutor, may, with
the consent of the offended party, agree to a plea of guilty to a lesser
offense. For this purpose, the Chief State Prosecutor or the Provincial or
City Prosecutor concerned shall act on the recommendation of the Trial
Prosecutor within forty-eight (48) hours from receipt thereof. In no case
shall the subject plea to a lesser offense be allowed without the
written approval of the above respective heads of office.
e. In all cases, the penalty for the lesser offense to which the accused may be
allowed to plead guilty shall not be more than two (2) degrees lower
than the imposable penalty for the crime charged, notwithstanding
the presence of mitigating circumstances. The lesser offense shall
also be one that is necessarily related to the offense charged or the offense
must belong to the same classification or title under the Revised Penal
Code or the relevant special laws.79
f. However, the plea of guilty to a lesser offense may not be allowed where it
so contravenes law and common sense as to be unconscionable,
thereby resulting injustice. Where the offense charged is homicide, a plea
of guilty to a lesser offense of frustrated or attempted homicide, may not
be allowed, since the fact of death cannot be reconciled with the plea of
guilty to frustrated or attempted homicide. Homicide necessarily
produces death, while frustrated or attempted homicide does
not.80
79
80
SEC. 2. Concept of trial. - The object of a trial is to mete out justice, and to
convict the guilty and protect the innocent. Thus, the trial should be a search for
the truth and not a contest over technicalities and must be conducted under such
rules as will protect the innocent.
SEC. 4. Order of presentation of witnesses. a. The order in the presentation of witnesses will be left to the discretion of the
Trial Prosecutor. However, the prosecutor should take into consideration
the order of events as established by the evidence of the prosecution.
b. Witnesses who will testify for the first time shall be afforded the opportunity
to be advised to observe criminal proceedings in court to help them
overcome their anxiety, excitement and tension.
SEC. 6. Defense evidence. a. Before reception of evidence for the defense starts, the Trial Prosecutor shall
ask from the adverse counsel the number of witnesses he intends to
present.
b. If the names of defense witnesses are disclosed the Trial Prosecutor shall
elicit from reliable sources the whereabouts of these witnesses, their moral
character, background, reasons for testifying and relationship with the
accused, among other things, to enable him to have a clear view of the
defense of the accused.
SEC. 9. Other persons who may avail of the Witness Protection Program.
-The following may also avail of the Witness Protection Program under R.A. No.
6981:
a. Any person who has witnessed or has knowledge of or information on the
commission of a crime and has testified or is testifying or is about to
testify before any judicial or quasi-judicial body, or before any
investigating authority, Provided, that:
i.
The offense in which his testimony will be used is a grave felony as defined under the
Revised Penal Code or its equivalent under special laws;
ii.
iii. He or any member of his family within the second civil degree of consanguinity or
affinity is subjected to threats to his life or bodily injury or there is a likelihood that
he will be killed, forced, intimidated, harassed or corrupted to prevent him from
may avail themselves of the protection provided for under the Act.
b. Any person who has participated in the commission of a crime and desires
to be a witness for the State, whenever the following circumstances are
present:
i. The offense in which testimony will be used is a grave felony as defined under the
Revised Penal Code or its equivalent under special laws;
ii. There is absolute necessity for his testimony;
iii. There is no other direct evidence available for the proper prosecution of the offense
committed;
iv. His testimony can be substantially corroborated on its material points;
v. He does not appear to be the most guilty; and
vi. He has not at any time been convicted of any crime involving moral turpitude.
SEC. 12. Presentation of evidence. - Each party is bound to complete the
presentation of his evidence within the trial dates assigned to him. After the lapse
of said dates, the party is deemed to have completed his evidence presentation.
However, upon verified motion based on serious reasons, the judge may allow
the party additional trial dates in the afternoon; provided that said extension will
not go beyond the three-month limit computed from the first trial date.
Where a Trial Prosecutor, without good cause, secures postponements of the
trial over the objections of a defendant beyond a reasonable period of time, the
SEC. 13. Order of trial. - Upon receipt of the notice of trial, the prosecutor
shall review the record of the case for trial and complete his preparation therefore
bearing in mind that trial, once commenced, may continue from day to day until
terminated, and that trial shall proceed in the following order pursuant to Sec. 3,
Rule 119 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure:
a. The prosecution shall present evidence to prove the charge and, in the
proper case, the civil liability. [direct-cross-redirect-recross]
b. The accused may present evidence to prove his defense, and damages, if
any, arising from the issuance of any provisional remedy in the case.
c. The parties may then respectively present rebutting evidence only, unless the
court, in furtherance of justice, permits them to present additional
evidence bearing upon the main issue.
d. Upon admission of the evidence, the case shall be deemed submitted for
decision unless the court directs the parties to argue orally or to submit
memoranda.
e. However, when the accused admits the act or omission charged in the
complaint or information but interposes a lawful defense, the order of
trial may be modified accordingly.
For example, in the case of prosecution under the Dangerous Drugs Law, the
Trial Prosecutor should present the forensic chemist who examined the dangerous
drug ahead of the other witnesses in order that the court may at once have a view
of the real evidence (either the prohibited or regulated drug subject of the case)
and so that such evidence may be immediately identified by the other witnesses
thus avoiding the recall of witnesses later on.