Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2016-CH-09212
CALENDAR: 07
To: Matthew Vincent Topic
matt@loevy.com
matt@loevy.com
(312) 243-5902
10/11/2016 1:31:10 PM
265
DOROTHY BROWN
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
CALENDAR: 07
PAGE 1 of 16
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
ANDREW THAYER,
RICK GARCIA,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
v.
CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL,
Defendant.
16 CH 09212
Judge Diane J. Larsen
ARGUMENT
As discussed in
Plaintiffs opening brief, instead of the normal preliminary injunction prongs, when a statute
such as OMA explicitly provides for injunctive relief Plaintiffs must allege and show only that
(1) the defendant has violated the statute and (2) the plaintiff has standingthere is no necessity
to prove irreparable damage or the absence of an adequate remedy at law. Roxana Cmty. Unit
Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. WRB Ref., LP, 2012 IL App (4th) 120331 at 24 (citations omitted) (emphasis
added).
Defendant misstates the controlling caselaw laid out in WRB Refining, LP. Def. Opp. 46; Roxana Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. WRB Ref., LP, 2012 IL App (4th) 120331. Contrary to
the explicit language of the case, Defendant contends that even under WRB Refining, LP,
Plaintiffs must still prove additional elements of the traditional preliminary injunction test, such
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 2 of 16
as a likelihood of future irreparable harm. Id. at 5. Defendant argues for a distinction between
proving past harm versus future harm, stating that WRB Refining, LP might alleviate the burden
for proving past irreparable harm, but not for proving future harm. Id. Notably, when misstating
what WRB Refining, LP held, Defendant provides no cite or authority other than the quote which
explicitly contradicts its position (plaintiff need allege and show only that (1) the defendant has
violated the statute and (2) the plaintiff has standingthere is no necessity to prove irreparable
damage or the absence of an adequate remedy at law.). Id. The holding of WRB Refining, LP,
is clear and explicit and Defendants attempts to spin the holding into something more
complicated should be rejected. Plaintiffs need only show that they have standing and that
Defendant violated OMA.
ii. Defendants Mislabeled Standing Argument Is Rejected By The
Controlling Caselaw
Apparently recognizing that the normal prongs of the preliminary injunction test do not
apply here, Defendant tries to frame its argument that there is no likelihood future irreparable
injury will occur as a standing argument. 1 Def. Opp. at 6-7. The Court need go no further as
Defendants standing argument is wholly inapplicable under the governing caselaw because
the irreparable injury prong of the preliminary injunction test does not apply here. Regardless,
even if Defendant could argue its standing issue, the argument still fails on the merits. The
remedies section of OMA does not distinguish between remedies for standing purposes. 5 ILCS
120/3. Rather, OMA Section 3 inclusively gives standing to any person when OMA was
violated regardless of whether they are seeking an injunction or other relief. Id.
B. Defendants Closed Meetings Must Be Enjoined
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 3 of 16
i.
Citing Section 2(a), Defendant incorrectly defines a closed meeting as one where public
attendance is not allowed. Def. Opp. at 2. OMA Section 2(a) states: Openness required. All
meetings of public bodies shall be open to the public unless excepted in subsection (c) and closed
in accordance with Section 2a. 5 ILCS 120/2(a). Defendants definition is at odds with the
plain language of OMA.
improperly closed meetings under OMA even where members of the public gain admittance.
Gerwin v. Livingston Cty. Bd., 345 Ill. App. 3d 352, 358 (2003).
preferential access to meetings to certain people constitutes a closed meeting under OMA, as
discussed in more detail below. Id.
Defendant argues that the ability to watch videos or streams of a meeting, or the ability to
read a transcript of a meeting, somehow satisfies its statutory obligation to hold open meetings.
Plaintiffs need not allege a risk of future harm to themselves though they have done so
anyways. Both Plaintiffs have furnished affidavits declaring their intent to attend future CITY
COUNCIL meetings. Ex. A (Thayer Aff. 2); Ex. B (Garcia Aff. 2). Furthermore, Plaintiffs
demonstrate, infra, that Defendants seating and public comment policies adopted in response to
this litigation will continue to violate OMA even if they are followed.
3
Def. Opp. at 8. Defendant describes OMA as having some sort of vague policy only allowing
the citizenry to observe the workings of public bodies. Id. This argument is false on its face. 5
ILCS 120/1. OMAs third sentence explicitly states that it is the public policy of this State that
its citizens shall be given advance notice of and the right to attend all meetings at which any
business of a public body is discussed or acted upon in any way. 5 ILCS 120/1 (emphasis
added).
In addition, Defendant repeatedly describes its violations of OMA as two isolated
events. Def. Opp. at 1, 5-6. It argues that if violations are isolated and there is no showing
that CITY COUNCIL is likely to violate the Act in the future then a preliminary injunction is
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 4 of 16
not warranted. Def. Opp. at 1, 5-6. Defendants argument is doomed for two reasons. First,
Plaintiffs allege four violations of OMA, two violations that recurred on at least two separate
occasions. Ver. Am. Compl. 32-43. On both May 18, 2016, and June 22, 2016, Defendant
held improperly closed meetings and did not allow any public comment at all.
Second,
Defendant again misstates the law. Plaintiffs need not allege multiple recurring violations, even
though they did. Roxana Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. WRB Ref., LP, 2012 IL App (4th)
120331 24. Plus, Defendant concedes that it is normal for people to be stuck in line trying to
get into CITY COUNCIL meetings an hour to an hour-and-a-half after they have started. Ex. C
(Kipka Dep.) at 22:3-22:6. Moreover, the Appellate Court has explicitly stated that there is a
presumption that any violation of OMA causes a distinctly public harm. Roxana Cmty. Unit
Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. WRB Ref., LP, 2012 IL App (4th) 120331 26. Finally, Defendant has a
100% OMA violation rate as far as Plaintiffs are aware and Defendant has refused to produce
discovery on any meetings besides the May 18 and June 22 meetings. Def. Disc. Resp. RFP
3-4, attached as Ex. D.
ii.
CITY COUNCIL meetings in which not a single member of the public without
preferential seat reservations can attend until well after a meeting has started are not open
meetings under OMA. 2
In addition, the
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 5 of 16
Appellate Court has flatly rejected the notion that meetings need only be open in a technical
sense as Defendant suggests. Gerwin 345 Ill. App. 3d at 359. In Gerwin, it was alleged that the
public body gave agents of a company preferential access to the meeting and to that extent
improperly excluded opposition. Id. The Gerwin court held that if true, this was a violation of
OMA and not a properly open meeting. Id. The court further stated that the meeting being
officially open did not refute the claim that the public body gave preferential admission to
certain people and, to that extent, restricted the audience to a particular group. Id. CITY
COUNCIL has a longstanding practice giving preferential access to people by reserving seats for
them. Ex. E (Starks Dep.) at 56:6-12, 58:2-5; Ex. F (Brown Dep.) at 28:21-23. Members of the
public are given not even secondary access, but tertiary access to seats after those with
reservations and their companions without reservations get theirs. Ex. F at 60:17-62:14. As a
result, the May 18 and June 22 CITY COUNCIL meetings were improperly closed meetings.
Defendant spends time describing Thayers reasons for attending the May 18, 2016, meeting.
Def. Opp. at 8; Def. Supp. Opp. at 2. This is of no relevance under OMA. 5 ILCS 120/1.
5
This is not an isolated problem. There are 213 public seats on the second floor of the
CITY COUNCIL chamber and 99 public seats in the third floor gallery. Ex. F at 27:4-13. Of
these seats, 44 on the second floor are permanently reserved. Ex. E at 56:6-12, 58:2-5; Ex. F at
28:21-23. At the May 18 meeting, at least 198 seats on the second floor were reserved ahead of
time. Ex. F at 56:13-16; Ex. G. At the June 22 meeting, at least 190 seats on the second floor
were reserved ahead of time. Ex. F at 59:18-60:1; Ex. G. Defendant concedes that even the very
first people in line at CITY COUNCIL meetings without preferential seat reservations very
regular[ly] would not get the few supposedly unreserved seats because they are taken by other
groups. 3 Ex. F at 60:17-62:14. At both the May 18 and June 22 meetings not a single seat on
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 6 of 16
either the second or third floors was set aside for people without preferential seat reservations.
Ex. F at 32:12-17, 34:3-7. This longstanding practice of preferential reserved seating violates
OMAs overarching purpose in the most fundamental way.
In order to implement OMAs broad requirement of openness, there are also a number
of subsidiary requirements public bodies must meet, including the convenience requirement.
Gerwin v. Livingston Cty. Bd., 345 Ill. App. 3d 352, 359 (2003). The convenience requirement
can be violated in different ways. For example, holding a meeting in a location too small to
accommodate members of the public violates the open and convenient requirements of OMA
because members of the public would have difficulty gaining admittance. Id. at 362. The
Appellate Court also stated that a public body knowingly not providing enough seating for
members of the public when the body had one weeks notice of the number of people wanting to
attend supports a finding that a meeting was not truly open. Id. at 362-363.
These other groups are typically groups that had preferential seat reservations, but decided to
bring additional people beyond the number of seats Defendant had already reserved for them.
Ex. F at 60:17-62:14.
6
Here, Plaintiffs experienced far more than mere difficulty gaining admittance, and
CITY COUNCIL had much more than one weeks notice of the number of people wanting to
attend the May 18 and June 22 meetings. Either of these points alone is sufficient to find that
Defendant did not hold truly open meetings as OMA requires. It is undisputed that on May 18,
Thayer, along with about seven others, lined up an hour-and-a-half before the meeting began and
were the very first people in line. Ver. Am. Compl. 9-10; Def. Ans. 9-10. It is undisputed
that on June 22, Garcia, along with one other, lined up about an hour-and-a-half before the
meeting began. Ver. Am. Compl. 22, 25; Def. Ans. 22, 25. It is undisputed that not a
single member of the public, including the very first people in line, gained admittance to either
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 7 of 16
the May 18 or June 22 CITY COUNCIL meetings when they started. Ver. Am. Compl. 10,
25; Def. Ans. 10, 25. Further, it is undisputed that for the first hour of the May 18 meeting
and at least the first two hours of the June 22 meeting not a single member of the public waiting
in line got into the meetings. Ver. Am. Compl. 11, 26; Def. Ans. 11, 26. This alone
necessitates finding that both the May 18 and June 22 meetings were improperly closed meetings
in blatant violation of OMA.
Additionally, Defendant had far more than one weeks notice regarding the number of
people that usually desire to attend CITY COUNCIL meetings. Ex. C at 22:10-23:7. Defendant
concedes that almost every CITY COUNCIL meeting has lines over 50 people long. Id. In
addition, Defendant acknowledges that it has lines over 100 people long multiple times a year
and has had at least one line 200 people long. Id. Furthermore, Defendant concedes that it is
normal for people to be stuck in line trying to get into CITY COUNCIL meetings an hour to an
hour-and-a-half after they have started. Id. at 22:3-22:6. This is much more egregious than the
mere difficulty gaining admittance contemplated by the Gerwin court. Despite knowing that
almost every meeting has at least 50 people without seat reservations desiring to get in, and
frequently dozens more than that, Defendant failed to properly accommodate a single person at
either the May 18 or June 22 meetings.
iii.
Defendant states that its new seating policy, created and adopted in response to this
litigation, obviates the need for a preliminary injunction. Def. Opp. at 7. Even if Defendants
new seating policy were adequate, an injunction would still be necessary under the law. Roxana
Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. WRB Ref., LP, 2012 IL App (4th) 120331 24 (To obtain an
injunction in an OMA case, the plaintiff must allege and show only that (1) the defendant has
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 8 of 16
voluntary cessation only appears to have occurred in response to the present litigation, which
shows a greater likelihood that it could be resumed. Northland Family Planning Clinic, Inc. v.
Cox, 487 F.3d 323, 342-43 (6th Cir. 2007) (citing Ragsdale v. Turnock, 841 F.2d 1358, 1366 (7th
Cir. 1988) (We share the district courts concern that the States position on this provision is
asserted only in this litigation.)).
8
Furthermore, Defendant continues to maintain that its former practice did not violate
OMA. According to Defendants logic, Defendant could wait until the cessation of litigation and
immediately resume its former practices in violation of OMA. Injunctive relief is especially
appropriate in situations like this one, where the defendants are otherwise free to return to their
illegal action at any time. See United States v. W.T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 633 (1953)
(holding that defendants assertion that it has no intention of reinstating the challenged practice
does not suffice to make a case moot); see also Am. Soc'y of Plumbing Engineers v. TMB Pub.,
Inc., 109 F. App'x 781, 785-786 (7th Cir. 2004).
Regardless, the new policy is inadequate for multiple independent reasons. First, the
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 9 of 16
policy only sets aside a total of 30 seats that cannot be reserved out of 312. Ex. I; Ex. F at 27:413. Defendant entirely ignores the historic number of people that attend CITY COUNCIL
meetings when it created this policy. As discussed previously, Defendant concedes that at
essentially every CITY COUNCIL meeting there are at least 50 members of the public without
seat reservations desiring to get in, if not 100 or more. Ex. C at 22:10-23:7. Next, the policy
prohibits lining up more than one hour prior to a CITY COUNCIL meeting even though people
have lined up an hour and a half prior to meetings and still were unable to get in when they
started. Ex. I; Ver. Am. Compl. 9-11, 22, 25-26; Def. Ans. 9-11, 22, 25-26.
Furthermore, allowing the public to reserve seats is insufficient and problematic at best.
Ex. I. First, the public should not have to reserve seats at all in order to attend a CITY
COUNCIL meeting and there is nothing in OMA that requires advanced reservations. Second,
the opaque nature of applying for seat reservations leaves the public no way to police the policy
as truly being first-come first-served. It is clear that the first-come first-serve policy is not
always followed. Ex. F at 89:10-90:3 (assistant sergeant-at-arms refusing seat reservations to
one group stating seats were not available and later granting additional seat reservations to
another group). Third, the reservation policy requires members of the public to provide their
identifying information including a description of the group requesting the reserved seating to
subject themselves to a vague, unofficial and unsupervised screening process. Ex. F at 44:2-15;
Ex. I. This unofficial and unsupervised process consists of a lone employee, with no security
training, researching people on Google based on nothing more than a hunch. Ex. F at 45:1447:13. This ambiguous screening process is not even executed in an unbiased manner because
not every group applying for seat reservations is screened. Id. This newly created seating policy
does little to nothing to fix Defendants violations of OMA and instead introduces a fresh slew of
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 10 of 16
problems, most notably, that unlike a process in which everyone can see whether a line is
processed in a first-come first-serve manner, a reservation system allows CITY COUNCIL to
violate the policy without the public seeing it happening.
C. Defendant Must Allow Public Comment
i.
position. Roxana Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 2013 IL App (4th) 120825,
58 (Here, the Boards rules restricted the opportunity to address that body to written filings. . .
. The Boards actions not only violated the aforementioned specific sections of the Open
Meetings Act but also its overarching purpose.) Restricting the opportunity to address public
officials to writing violates both Section 2.06(g) and OMAs overarching purpose. Id.
Defendant mischaracterizes Section 2.06(g) and states that it need only provide an
opportunity to address public officials at the meetings of its choosing because OMA gives it the
right to enforce rules that it established and recorded regarding public comment. Def. Opp. at
9-11; 5 ILCS 120/2.06(g). To begin, Defendant failed to come forward with evidence that it
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 11 of 16
even has established and recorded rules regarding public comment that it may enforce. 5 ILCS
120/2.06(g); See Ill. Atty. Gen. Binding PAC Opinion 14-009 (The plain language of section
2.06(g) of OMA provides that individuals are entitled to address a public body subject only to a
public bodys established and recorded rules.). Instead, Defendant references a tradition of
not providing an opportunity for public comment at CITY COUNCIL meetings. Def. Opp. at 4.
In any event, Defendants argument is unfounded. OMA details the requirements of
every meeting. 5 ILCS 120. If Defendants position were correct, then any public body could
arbitrarily eliminate public comment from any meeting it chose simply by creating a rule doing
so. As the Illinois Appellate Court stated in Environmental Protection Agency, the failure to
provide an opportunity to address public officials at a public meeting is both a violation of the
explicit language of 2.06(g) and a violation of OMAs overarching purpose. Roxana Cmty.
Unit Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 2013 IL App (4th) 120825, 57-58. OMA exists
in great part to protect and encourage public debate. People ex rel. Ryan v. Vill. of Villa Park,
212 Ill. App. 3d 187, 193 (1991). Defendants logic would foreclose public debate by continuing
11
to prohibit public comment and foreclosing public debate is completely contrary to the
objectives of the Act. Id. As the Appellate Court has stated, the drafters of the Act recognized
the value of citizen input and participation in government in a democratic society. People ex
rel. Ryan v. Vill. of Villa Park, 212 Ill. App. 3d 187, 192 (1991).
Defendant argues that First Amendment jurisprudence, specifically City of Aurora,
somehow supports its position of not allowing public comment at CITY COUNCIL meetings.
Def. Opp. at 11; Rana Enterprises, Inc v. City of Aurora, 630 F. Supp. 2d 912, 924-25 (2009).
Defendant is wrong for two independent reasons. First, Plaintiffs are not alleging any violation
of the First Amendment; Plaintiffs have alleged four violations of OMA. While the First
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 12 of 16
Amendment sets a floor with regard to the right to speak and petition, OMA grants even greater
rights. (Indeed, OMAs provision would be superfluous if it only extended as far as First
Amendment rights.) Second, even if a First Amendment analysis is appropriate, both First
Amendment jurisprudence generally, and City of Aurora specifically, support Plaintiffs. Def.
Opp. at 11; City of Aurora 630 F. Supp. 2d at 924-25. Defendant describes the meeting in
question in City of Aurora as a non-public forum, at which the public had no right to speak.
Def. Opp. at 11. Here, Defendant concedes that it is a public body under OMA required to hold
open meetings and provide an opportunity for public comment. Def. Ans. at 33, 36, 39, 42.
Clearly public bodies subject to OMA may not eliminate the opportunity to address public
officials entirely.
In addition, binding PAC opinions relying on a First Amendment analysis provide
compelling persuasive authority as to what kind of rules a public body may promulgate under
Section 2.06(g) and establish that public bodies may not create rules eliminating the opportunity
to address public officials at a meeting entirely. See Ill. Atty Gen. Binding PAC Opinion 14-
12
009; Ill. Atty Gen. Binding PAC Opinion 14-012. For example, public bodies may impose
reasonable time limits for each speaker to conserve time and ensure others receive an opportunity
to speak as well. Id. They may not use their rules to eliminate public comment entirely.
Defendant also asks the Court to consider OMAs legislative history. Def. Opp. at 9-10.
Defendant states that the fact that the phrase at meetings subject to this Act was considered by
the legislature, but did not make it into Section 2.06(g) somehow indicates that the General
Assembly intended to exempt meetings from the public comment requirement. Id. Legislative
history is irrelevant where, as here, the plain text of the statute provides an answer. Maschek v.
City of Chicago, 2015 IL App (1st) 150520, 44 (If the statutory language is clear, we must
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 13 of 16
apply it, without resort to any aids of statutory construction. If, and only if, the statutory
language is ambiguous, may we look to other sources to ascertain the legislature's intent.)
(citations omitted). Nor is legislative inaction a reliable manner of interpreting a statute anyway.
E.g., Bob Jones Univ. v. United States, 461 U.S. 574, 600 (1983) (Ordinarily, and quite
appropriately, courts are slow to attribute significance to the failure of Congress to act on
particular legislation. We have observed that unsuccessful attempts at legislation are not the
best of guides to legislative intent.) (citations omitted). Regardless, Defendants argument is
nonsensical on its face. Section 2.06(g) was added to OMA effective January 1, 2011, in order
to require that all public bodies subject to the Act provide an opportunity for members of the
public to address public officials at open meetings. Ill. Atty Gen. Binding PAC Opinion 14009; Ill. Atty Gen. Binding PAC Opinion 14-012 (emphasis added). If the Court wishes to
engage in speculation about the significance of the phrase at meetings subject to this Act, it
should not follow Defendants interpretation which is illogical and contradicts common sense.
Instead, it is far more plausible that the phrase did not make the final cut because it is
13
superfluous. Section 2.06(g) applies to meetings subject to OMA because that is what the entire
statute is about. 5 ILCS 120/1.
ii.
Though Defendant did not note or rely on it in its briefing, it created a public comment
policy (likely in response to this litigation) which Plaintiffs will address. 4 Ex. J. This newly
enacted policy further indicates that Defendant did not even have established and recorded
rules regarding public comment that it could enforce prior to this suit. Id.
The newly adopted policy is inadequate and violates OMA. The policy still does not
provide any opportunity to address CITY COUNCIL at CITY COUNCIL meetings. Ex. J.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 14 of 16
Instead, it only provides for addressing a subset of public officials at committee meetings. Id.
CITY COUNCIL and its committees are separate public bodies. 5 ILCS 120/1.02 (Public
body includes all legislative . . . bodies of the State . . . and any subsidiary bodies of any of the
foregoing including but not limited to committees and subcommittees.).
Next, Defendants policy contains a content restriction on public comment. Id. It states
that members of the public may only address the subject matter appearing on the agenda of the
meeting in question. Id. OMA does not restrict the subject matter members of the public may
address. 5 ILCS 120/2.06(g). Allowing a public body to promulgate content restriction rules
would let the body control what kind of complaints it hears from the public. For example, if a
public body never wanted to hear citizen remarks regarding police misconduct it could simply
never put that issue on the agenda. OMA was created to prevent public business from being
hidden in such a manner. It is the public policy of this State that public bodies exist to aid in the
Defendant adopted this new seating policy on October 5, 2016, and produced the policy to
Plaintiffs on October 6, 2016, just days before Plaintiffs deadline to file this brief. Ex. J.
14
conduct of the peoples business and that the people have a right to be informed as to the conduct
of their business. 5 ILCS 120/1.
D. Remaining Traditional Preliminary Injunction Factors
While not necessary (or even relevant) under the controlling caselaw, Plaintiffs will
address the remaining traditional preliminary injunction factors.
i.
Protectable Right
OMA makes clear that any person may bring suit when OMA has been violated, and may
seek, among other remedies, an injunction declaring actions taken at an improper meeting null
and void.
5 ILCS 120/3.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 15 of 16
OMA does not provide for damages claims, but only injunctive relief. As such, there is
no adequate remedy at law. In addition, OMA grants even greater rights beyond the floor that
the First Amendment already provides and it is well established that the loss of First
Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable
injury, and [that] money damages are therefore inadequate. Joelner, 378 F.3d at 620 (quoting
Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976)). If a policy violates OMA, an injunction is plainly the
appropriate remedy.
II.
CONCLUSION
For these reasons this Court should issue a preliminary injunction requiring CITY
COUNCIL to comply with OMA by holding properly open meetings and providing an
opportunity for people to address public officials at CITY COUNCIL meetings.
15
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Joshua Hart Burday
_________________________________
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 16 of 16
Matthew Topic
Joshua Burday
LOEVY & LOEVY
311 North Aberdeen, 3rd floor
Chicago, IL 60607
(312) 243-5900
matt@loevy.com
joshb@loevy.com
Atty. No. 41295
Alan Mills
UPTOWN PEOPLES LAW CENTER
4413 N. Sheridan Road
Chicago IL 60640
Alan@uplcchicago.org
Atty. No. 70272
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Joshua Burday, an attorney, certify that on October 11, 2016 I served the foregoing
Plaintiffs Reply in Support of Their Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction via electronic
mail on all counsel of record.
/s/ Joshua Hart Burday
16
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
CALENDAR: 07
PAGE 1 of 1
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
Exhibit A
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
CALENDAR: 07
PAGE 1 of 1
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
Exhibit B
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
JOSEPH KIPKA
September
21, 2016
CALENDAR:
07
PAGE 1 of 341
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
Exhibit C
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 PRESENT:
2 LOEVY & LOEVY,
3 (311 North Aberdeen Street, 3rd Floor,
4 Chicago, Illinois 60607,
5 (312) 243-5900), by:
6 MR. JOSHUA BURDAY and
7 MS. KATE MILLER,
8 appeared on behalf of the Plaintiffs,
9
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 2 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 K-I-P-K-A.
11 Q. Have you been deposed before?
12 A. Yes, I have.
13 Q. How many times have you been deposed
14 before?
15 A. Probably -- maybe two, three times.
16 Q. When was that?
17 A. It was going back at least 12, 13 years
18 ago was the last time.
19 Q. What were those depositions about?
20 A. The last one was a result from an arrest
21 we made, and we were being sued for violation of
22 civil rights, and I don't recall the other one.
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 6 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 District.
2 Q. How is it you ended up assigned to the
3 City Hall detail?
4 A. The spot opened up and they asked me if
5 I would like to give it a try to work at City Hall,
6 and I said sure.
7 Q. So someone came and asked you rather
8 than you seeing a job opening and applying?
9 A. That's correct.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 7 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 it to?
2 MS. SOBOTA: Object to foundation. If you
3 know, you can answer.
4 BY THE WITNESS:
5 A. I don't know.
6 BY MR. BURDAY:
7 Q. Do you consider your job a desirable
8 position, to be assigned to that detail?
9 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 8 of 34
10 BY THE WITNESS:
11 A. Speaking for myself, I like the job.
12 BY MR. BURDAY:
13 Q. During City Council meetings, where do
14 you work?
15 A. My main function is on the second floor.
16 There are two metal detectors on the second floor.
17 So we make sure that the area is safe by going
18 through bags and having people go through the metal
19 detector.
20 Q. Is there a term you use to refer to the
21 area with the metal detectors, like the entrance or
22 anything like that?
23 A. Just the second floor lobby.
24 Q. Second floor lobby?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. That's how you refer to the area with
3 the metal detectors and where you search people
4 when they come in?
5 A. Basically, yes.
6 Q. Do you work anywhere else during the
7 City Council meetings? Do you move around at all?
8 A. I do move around, yes.
9 Q. Where else do you go?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 9 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 filled up.
2 Q. And that's what you're referring to as
3 the third floor lobby?
4 A. Yes, sir.
5 Q. Gotcha. And what would make you move to
6 those areas, away from the entrance?
7 A. If there's a crowd or if there's a
8 problem, being the sergeant, I respond there to
9 make sure that the problem or the crowd is -- has
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 10 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. Well, I could just say that the second
3 floor is the main area where the press conferences
4 are held. So during the press conference, I'm
5 usually out there to make sure that if there's an
6 opposing opposition to whatever the press
7 conference is about, that they respect each other
8 and allow them to do their press conference without
9 making noise. In turn, when the next group is
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 11 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. And do you recall the June 22nd City
12 Council meeting?
13 A. No, I was not there for that meeting.
14 was on furlough.
15 Q. And who fills in for you if you're not
16 there?
17 A. There is a sergeant up on the fifth
18 floor, Sergeant Dwayne Johnson, and he'll fill in
19 for me when I'm not in the building.
20 Q. Did he fill in for you June 22nd?
21 A. Yes, he did.
22 Q. Do you know Andy Thayer?
23 A. Yes, I do.
24 Q. How do you know him?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY MR. BURDAY:
2 Q. What would be out of the ordinary?
3 A. I guess if somebody committed a crime
4 where I locked them up or did something outrageous
5 like, you know, fought with somebody, you know,
6 something that would force me to take some kind of
7 police action, then I guess I would remember that
8 person, this person could be trouble for us, you
9 know.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 14 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Have you ever met Rick Garcia as far as
12 you know?
13 A. As far as I know, no.
14 Q. And do you know him to be a protestor?
15 A. No, I don't know him.
16 Q. At the May 18th meeting, were there
17 people in line waiting to get in without seat
18 reservations that you recognized?
19 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
20 BY THE WITNESS:
21 A. Andy Thayer was in line at some point
22 for that May meeting.
23 BY MR. BURDAY:
24 Q. And what did you think when you saw Andy
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 Thayer in line?
2 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
3 BY THE WITNESS:
4 A. Nothing out of the ordinary.
5 BY MR. BURDAY:
6 Q. Did anyone running the line at the
7 June 22nd meeting -- do you know if anyone running
8 the line at the June 22nd meeting recognized
9 anybody waiting in line?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 16 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 Q. That's fine.
2 A. The June 22nd meeting, I wasn't there,
3 and I didn't really get involved in what happened.
4 I knew it was a busy meeting, but until the lawsuit
5 came up, then I got a little bit more information.
6 Q. So just jumping back to when you were
7 called to the lobby at the May 18th meeting, why
8 were you called to the lobby?
9 A. Andy Thayer was yelling that he wanted
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 17 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 A. That's correct.
11 Q. Is that how you normally find out if
12 seats are available?
13 A. Yeah, I usually ask the sergeant-at-arms
14 or his staff, hey, can we fit more people in here.
15 Q. And how often do you ask that at a
16 meeting?
17 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
18 BY THE WITNESS:
19 A. If there's people on the second floor
20 lobby waiting to get in and watching, at some point
21 during the meeting I flow back and forth to try to
22 get them into the meeting.
23 BY MR. BURDAY:
24 Q. Just your best estimate of how frequent
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 that is?
2 A. If there's people on the second floor, I
3 would say probably every -- I'm guessing here,
4 which I'm not supposed to guess, I think, but maybe
5 about every half hour, 20, 30 minutes.
6 Q. Is that an official policy or practice?
7 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
8 BY THE WITNESS:
9 A. No, it's just a practical practice, just
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 19 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. How do you decide what time to start
12 letting people in that don't have seat
13 reservations?
14 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
15 BY THE WITNESS:
16 A. When the sergeant-at-arms opens up the
17 doors.
18 BY MR. BURDAY:
19 Q. What time does the sergeant-at-arms
20 usually open up the doors?
21 A. Usually, after 9:30.
22 Q. So usually after 9:30, that's the time
23 that you start letting people in line in?
24 A. Yes.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 BY THE WITNESS:
11 A. Yeah, I don't recall how many people.
12 There were definitely some people waiting to get
13 in.
14 BY MR. BURDAY:
15 Q. Do you remember -- can you estimate
16 roughly at any time about how many people were
17 waiting in line at the May 18th meeting?
18 A. I really don't remember how many people
19 were waiting at that meeting.
20 Q. Same question for the June 22nd meeting,
21 do you know how many people were in line at the
22 June 22nd City Council meeting?
23 A. No, I don't.
24 Q. Do you know whether any members of the
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY MR. BURDAY:
2 Q. And you mentioned in your last answer
3 that you get called. Who calls you?
4 A. Police officers. We've got the same
5 radio.
6 Q. Does anyone else call you besides police
7 officers?
8 A. Not really.
9 Q. And do you do anything to make sure
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 27 of 34
YVer1f
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 Council chambers?
2 A. No, in the lobby of the second floor.
3 Inside the City Council chambers, we ask them to be
4 quiet, respectful and view the meeting.
5 Q. Do you ever not let people into the
6 chambers for any reason?
7 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
8 BY THE WITNESS:
9 A. No, except for no seats.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 28 of 34
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10
11 That the foregoing deposition transcript
12 was reported stenographically by me, was thereafter
13 reduced to typewriting under my personal direction
14 and constitutes a true record of the testimony
15 given and the proceedings had;
16
17 That the said deposition was taken
18 before me at the time and place specified;
19
20 That I am not a relative or employee or
21 attorney or counsel, nor a relative or employee of
22 such attorney or counsel for any of the parties
23 hereto, nor interested directly or indirectly in
24 the outcome of this action.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10
11 KAREN A. FAZIO, CSR No. 84-1834
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 I N D E X
2 JOSEPH KIPKA EXAMINATION
3 BY MR. BURDAY 3
4
5
6
7
8 NO EXHIBITS WERE MARKED.
9
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 31 of 34
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
JOSEPH KIPKA
THAYER and GARCIA -vs- CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
CALENDAR: 07
PAGE 1 of 7
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
Exhibit D
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 2 of 7
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 3 of 7
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 4 of 7
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 5 of 7
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 6 of 7
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 7 of 7
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
ALVIN STARKS
September
10, 2016
CALENDAR:
07
PAGE 1 of 741
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
Exhibit E
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 PRESENT:
2 LOEVY & LOEVY,
3 (311 North Aberdeen Street, 3rd Floor,
4 Chicago, Illinois 60607,
5 312-243-5900), by:
6 MR. JOSHUA BURDAY,
7 joshb@loevy.com,
8 MR. MATTHEW V. TOPIC,
9 matt@loevy.com,
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 2 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 A. Okay.
11 Q. And if you answer a question, is it safe
12 for me to assume that you understood it?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. Have you ever been deposed before?
15 A. No.
16 Q. You understand that you're being deposed
17 in your personal capacity and as a representative
18 of the City of Chicago on the subjects of reserve
19 seating and admitting denying members of the public
20 entry to City Council meetings; right?
21 MS. SOBOTA: I will object to the question.
22 He is not here as a representative of the City. He
23 is here as a representative of the Chicago City
24 Council, the defendant in this case.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY MR. BURDAY:
2 Q. You can answer the question.
3 A. Well, I will yield to my attorney.
4 MS. SOBOTA: You can ask him to rephrase it if
5 you don't understand it; otherwise, you need to
6 answer the question.
7 BY THE WITNESS:
8 A. Rephrase it.
9 BY MR. BURDAY:
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 5 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 summation of it.
11 Q. How many people work under you?
12 A. Seven.
13 Q. Who is your boss?
14 A. I have 50.
15 Q. And who are those 50?
16 A. The City Council of Chicago.
17 Q. Does Lamar Brown work under you?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Is there more than one person named
20 Lamar Brown working under you?
21 A. No.
22 Q. How often do you work at the City
23 Council meetings?
24 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY MR. BURDAY:
2 Q. You may answer.
3 A. I work every day.
4 Q. How often do you work at the Chicago
5 City Council meetings themselves?
6 A. The City Council meets once a month
7 normally.
8 Q. And are you at each of those meetings
9 when they meet once a month?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 9 of 74
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Have you ever missed a Chicago City
12 Council meeting?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. When was the last time that you missed a
15 Chicago City Council meeting?
16 A. I don't remember.
17 Q. Who fills your role when you miss a
18 Chicago City Council meeting?
19 A. My staff.
20 Q. Is it one person in particular that
21 fills your role, or is it a variety of people?
22 A. A variety.
23 Q. What percentage of your time would you
24 say that you spend on work related to the City
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. I don't know.
3 BY MR. BURDAY:
4 Q. How did you become aware that there was
5 reserved seating at Chicago City Council meetings?
6 A. When I took the job, I had to learn what
7 was going on. So there was staff that was there -8 that was held there when I started.
9 So we went through everything, and they
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 11 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. Reserved seated is required.
3 BY MR. BURDAY:
4 Q. What requires reserved seating?
5 A. There are certain individuals, certain
6 people that need to be at every City Council
7 meeting, and they need to have a seat.
8 Q. Who are the people that need to be at
9 the City Council meetings and need to have a seat?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 13 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. All of the gallery seats are not
3 reserved.
4 BY MR. BURDAY:
5 Q. You stated that seats were reserved in
6 the gallery when you first took your job.
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. They were -- were those seats reserved
9 for all future meetings when you took your job?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 15 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 BY MR. BURDAY:
11 Q. You may answer.
12 A. I don't find it odd.
13 Q. How do people go about reserving seats
14 at the Chicago City Council meetings?
15 A. They reach out to me, or they reach out
16 to one of my assistants, and they say: Alvin, or
17 whomever they reach out to, we need two seats
18 reserved in the Chamber for a City Council meeting
19 on said date.
20 Q. And when the City Council meetings
21 occur, how do you make sure people sit in the right
22 seats?
23 A. The seats are marked reserved. The
24 seating chart reflects whatever group is going to
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY MR. BURDAY:
2 Q. So people at the City Council meetings
3 do not speak if they're not speaking into a
4 microphone?
5 MS. SOBOTA: Object to the form. That
6 misstates his testimony.
7 BY THE WITNESS:
8 A. The aldermen do not speak unless they
9 are speaking into a microphone and have been
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 18 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 third floor?
11 A. 99.
12 Q. And how many seats are available on the
13 second floor?
14 A. On the second floor there are a total of
15 213 seats.
16 Q. Do you ever proactively ask if people
17 would like seats reserved for them?
18 A. Pardon me?
19 Q. Do you ever proactively ask if people
20 would like seats available for them at City Council
21 meetings?
22 A. No.
23 Q. Has anyone else before proactively asked
24 if someone would like seats reserved for them at a
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. Council, you have to refer to the Rules
3 of Order. There is -- I think it's Rule 840 or 49
4 which states that the Mayor and any elected
5 officials if they have guests that are attending
6 City Council meetings, seating must be provided for
7 them.
8 Most times there are ordinances or
9 resolutions that are being presented; for example,
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 21 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. How many are generally open to the
3 public?
4 BY MR. BURDAY:
5 Q. Yes.
6 A. A great deal. A great number of seats
7 are open to the public.
8 Q. Are over half of the seats in the
9 Chicago City Council chambers usually open to the
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 22 of 74
10 public?
11 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
12 BY THE WITNESS:
13 A. Maybe less, but yes, there is adequate
14 seating for the public. Let me put it this way.
15 After resolutions and all that has been done, the
16 City Council -- the bodies that the seats were
17 reserved for, for, say, a police or a firefighter
18 or you if you did something great, when those seats
19 and those people have been acknowledged, they
20 leave. When they leave, seats open up.
21 At any time after those open up, there
22 is more than enough seating to accommodate the
23 public. I can't ever remember a time when a member
24 of the public wasn't escorted in and seated.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY MR. BURDAY:
2 Q. Has there ever been a time when no
3 members of the public got into a City Council
4 meeting?
5 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form and foundation.
6 Also asked and answered.
7 BY THE WITNESS:
8 A. Not to my knowledge.
9 BY MR. BURDAY:
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 23 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 aldermen.
11 It also prevents someone from committing
12 suicide. They may want to jump off the third tier
13 onto the second tier. So it's there for safety.
14 Q. How are people able to hear through that
15 -16 A. Speakers.
17 Q. -- wall of glass?
18 A. Speakers.
19 MS. SOBOTA: Make sure that you let him finish
20 the question before you answer.
21 THE WITNESS: Okay.
22 BY MR. BURDAY:
23 Q. When was the third floor gallery glassed
24 off?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 A. I don't know.
11 BY MR. BURDAY:
12 Q. Do you have the authority to do away
13 with reserved seating at City Council meetings?
14 A. No.
15 Q. Who does have the authority to do away
16 with reserved seating at City Council meetings?
17 MS. SOBOTA: Object to foundation.
18 BY THE WITNESS:
19 A. I believe that's above my pay grade.
20 BY MR. BURDAY:
21 Q. What method do people use to reserve
22 seats for City Council meetings besides e-mail?
23 A. E-mail, face-to-face communication, a
24 letter, a phone call.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 A. Okay.
2 Q. Do you recognize Exhibit 1 to be a true
3 and correct copy of the Chicago City Council public
4 seating policy?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Who wrote the Chicago City Council
7 public seating policy?
8 A. It was drafted by our attorneys.
9 Q. Did anyone else participate in writing
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 28 of 74
10 it?
11 A. I did.
12 Q. Did anyone else participate in writing
13 it?
14 A. Not to my knowledge.
15 Q. Who has the authority to enact that
16 policy?
17 A. I do.
18 Q. Does anyone else have the authority to
19 enact that policy?
20 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
21 BY THE WITNESS:
22 A. I do.
23 BY MR. BURDAY:
24 Q. Does anyone else besides you have the
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 A. No.
11 Q. Why was that?
12 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form and foundation.
13 BY MR. BURDAY:
14 Q. Why was that?
15 A. If you look at the City Council's -- the
16 website for the Chicago City Clerk, it plainly
17 states when the City Council meets, and that it is
18 open to the public.
19 So there was -- I didn't think there was
20 a need to have a public seating policy, and, more
21 specifically, because we have never had an
22 encounter or a situation where members of the
23 public were not able to attend a City Council
24 meeting or not get seated in a City Council
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 meeting.
2 Q. Directing your attention to No. 2,
3 General Admission, the first sentence, is there a
4 reason that more than 15 seats on the second floor
5 and more than 15 seats on the third floor could not
6 be set aside for general admission?
7 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
8 BY THE WITNESS:
9 A. That is the minimum amount that we have
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 33 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY MR. BURDAY:
2 Q. Why could you not do that?
3 A. Because 15 seats on the first floor and
4 15 seats on the second floor and 15 seats on the
5 third floor are more than ample, and the
6 probability of guests coming into the Chamber are
7 not going to exceed the amount of available seating
8 that will be there for the public to come in.
9 And if it did, it would not -- the
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 34 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 is a seat available.
2 BY MR. BURDAY:
3 Q. Why did you make it optional instead of
4 mandatory that reserved seats will be released if
5 the individuals do not arrive within a half an hour
6 and have not notified you that they are delayed or
7 on their way?
8 MS. SOBOTA: I am going to object to the
9 question to the extent that it calls for
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 39 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And there was no opportunity for the
3 public to comment at the June 22, 2016, City
4 Council meeting; right?
5 A. Correct.
6 Q. Not allowing public comment was not an
7 isolated incident; right?
8 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form.
9 BY THE WITNESS:
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 42 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY MR. BURDAY:
2 Q. Please answer the question that I asked.
3 A. I did.
4 MR. BURDAY: Would you read the question back,
5 please?
6 (WHEREUPON, the record was read
7 as requested.)
8 MS. SOBOTA: The same objections.
9 BY THE WITNESS:
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 43 of 74
10 A. I don't know.
11 BY MR. BURDAY:
12 Q. Public comment was not allowed at City
13 Council meetings besides the May 18th and June
14 22nd, 2016, City Council meetings; right?
15 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form and foundation.
16 BY THE WITNESS:
17 A. I don't know.
18 BY MR. BURDAY:
19 Q. You understand that other towns allow
20 for public comment at their meetings; right?
21 MS. SOBOTA: Object to foundation.
22 BY THE WITNESS:
23 A. No, I don't.
24 BY MR. BURDAY:
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. I don't remember.
3 BY MR. BURDAY:
4 Q. Do you know Andy Thayer?
5 A. Who?
6 Q. Do you know Andy Thayer?
7 A. No.
8 Q. Do you know of Andy Thayer?
9 A. Of Andy Thayer? Yes.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 46 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 Council meeting?
11 A. The individuals will come to City Hall,
12 they will get on the elevator, they will take the
13 elevator to the second floor. When they get to the
14 second floor, they are greeted by the Chicago
15 Police Department. They are lined up. They are
16 vetted by going through a Magnetometer and the
17 police physically going through their bags, their
18 duffel bags, their pockets, their coats, or
19 whatever the case may be.
20 At that point they are asked to wait
21 until there is available seating in the Chamber.
22 If seating is available, once they have gone
23 through that vetting process, they're escorted to a
24 seat in the Chamber.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 10 a.m.?
11 MS. SOBOTA: Object to foundation.
12 BY THE WITNESS:
13 A. I'm sure that we did. Yes.
14 BY MR. BURDAY:
15 Q. What makes you sure that you let people
16 in at 10 a.m.?
17 A. Because if there's seating available at
18 10 a.m., and the people have gone through the
19 vetting process, they are seated.
20 Q. And how do you know that seating was
21 available at 10 a.m. on May 18th, 2016?
22 A. I don't.
23 Q. You just said that you were sure that
24 you let members of the public in at 10 a.m.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. No seats were reserved on the third
3 floor, I don't believe. I don't think there were
4 any seats reserved on the third floor.
5 BY MR. BURDAY:
6 Q. How many seats were reserved on the
7 second floor gallery?
8 MS. SOBOTA: Objection. Asked and answered.
9 BY THE WITNESS:
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 56 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY MR. BURDAY:
2 Q. Yes. That's the question.
3 A. There are seats reserved at every City
4 Council meeting. There is a standard 44 seats that
5 are permanently set aside.
6 Q. What time did you get to work on June
7 22, 2016?
8 A. Probably about the same time that I got
9 to work on May 18th.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 58 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. The same investigations that I just told
3 you about for May 18th. I looked at the seating
4 chart.
5 BY MR. BURDAY:
6 Q. You looked at the seating chart, and
7 that was it?
8 A. That was about it. Yes. I didn't do
9 any in-depth investigation to determine the
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 59 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10 BY MR. BURDAY:
11 Q. Did you or anyone else monitor who was
12 waiting to get into the June 22, 2016, Chicago City
13 Council meeting?
14 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form and foundation.
15 BY THE WITNESS:
16 A. No. I didn't monitor who was waiting to
17 get in.
18 BY MR. BURDAY:
19 Q. Did anyone else monitor who was waiting
20 to get into the June 22nd Chicago City Council
21 meeting?
22 A. No. As I stated -23 MS. SOBOTA: Objection to form and foundation.
24
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. As I stated earlier, if you're going to
3 come to a City Council meeting, you come to 121
4 North LaSalle, and you get on an elevator. You
5 come to the second floor. You exit the elevator.
6 You are greeted by the Chicago Police Department.
7 They vet you by checking you out to make sure that
8 you're not carrying any weapons or anything that
9 will harm you or anyone in the Chamber, running
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 61 of 74
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. Everyone who comes through there is from
3 the public.
4 BY MR. BURDAY:
5 Q. Did you let people into the meeting -6 the Chicago City Council meeting at 10 a.m. who had
7 not reserved seats?
8 MS. SOBOTA: Object to foundation.
9 BY THE WITNESS:
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 62 of 74
10 A. I don't remember.
11 BY MR. BURDAY:
12 Q. It was not an isolated incident that
13 members of the public who did not reserve seats did
14 not get into the meeting, the June 22nd meeting at
15 10 a.m.; correct?
16 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form and foundation.
17 The witness never testified whether or not people
18 got in at 10 a.m. If you know, you can answer.
19 BY THE WITNESS:
20 A. I don't know.
21 BY MR. BURDAY:
22 Q. Was the third floor gallery open to
23 members of the public who did not reserve seats on
24 June 22nd?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Did members of the public who did not
3 reserve seats sit in the third floor gallery on
4 June 22nd?
5 MS. SOBOTA: Object to foundation.
6 BY THE WITNESS:
7 A. I don't remember.
8 BY MR. BURDAY:
9 Q. The members of the public who did not
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 63 of 74
10 have reserved seating and did not get into the June
11 22nd meeting, did you offer them any other way to
12 see or hear the City Council meeting?
13 MS. SOBOTA: Object to form and foundation.
14 BY THE WITNESS:
15 A. I think that I answered the same
16 question for the -- you asked about the May 18th
17 meeting. If seating capacity was exceeded, people
18 would have had to wait in the elevator lobby until
19 seating became available.
20 MR. BURDAY: Could you read the question back,
21 please?
22 (WHEREUPON, the record was read
23 as requested.)
24 BY MR. BURDAY:
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
YVer1f
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. I don't know.
3 BY MR. BURDAY:
4 Q. Who worked the door -- the Magnetometer
5 at the June 22, 2016, Chicago City Council meeting?
6 A. The Chicago Police Department. Sergeant
7 Kipka is the supervisor of those officers.
8 Q. Do you know any of the other officers by
9 name at the June 22nd meeting?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 68 of 74
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 STATE OF ILLINOIS )
2 ) SS:
3 COUNTY OF DU PAGE )
4
5 I, NANCY A. GUIDOLIN, CSR No. 84-2531, a
6 Notary Public within and for the County of DuPage,
7 State of Illinois, and a Certified Shorthand
8 Reporter of said state, do hereby certify:
9 That previous to the commencement of the
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 69 of 74
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
10
11
12 NANCY A. GUIDOLIN, CSR No. 84-2531
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
1 I N D E X
2 WITNESS EXAMINATION
3 ALVIN STARKS
4 By Mr. Burday 3
5
6
7
8 E X H I B I T S
9 NUMBER MARKED FOR ID
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 71 of 74
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
ALVIN STARKS
THAYER vs. CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
CALENDAR: 07
PAGE 1 of 127
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
Exhibit F
10
11 The deposition of LAMAR CARL BROWN,
12 called for examination, taken pursuant to the
13 provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the
14 Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois
15 pertaining to the taking of depositions for the
16 purpose of discovery, taken before KRISTIN C.
17 BRAJKOVICH, a Certified Shorthand Reporter,
18 CSR No. 84-3810, of said State, at Suite 300,
19 311 North Aberdeen Street, Chicago, Illinois, on
20 Tuesday, September 20, 2016, at 12:53 p.m.
21
22
23
24
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
1 PRESENT:
2
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
CITY OF CHICAGO,
DEPARTMENT OF LAW,
(30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1230,
Chicago, Illinois 60602,
1-312-742-0260), by:
MS. MAGGIE SOBOTA,
maggie.sobota@cityofchicago.org,
MR. ANDREW S. MINE,
amine@cityofchicago.org, and
MS. TARA KENNEDY,
tara.kennedy@cityofchicago.org,
appeared on behalf of the Defendant.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 3 of 127
3
4
5
6
7
15
ALSO PRESENT:
16 MS. KATE MILLER, Loevy & Loevy, Law Student.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 REPORTED BY: KRISTIN C. BRAJKOVICH,
24 CSR No. 84-3810.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Okay. I'm also not going to ask you to
12 speculate. If you don't know the answer to the
13 question, then you can just tell me that you don't
14 know the answer to the question. Do you
15 understand?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Where do you work?
18 A. I work at City Hall for the City
19 Council.
20 Q. What is your job title?
21 A. Assistant sergeant-at-arms.
22 Q. And how long have you held that job?
23 A. Three years.
24 Q. Is that a full-time job?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
1 A. It is.
2 Q. Do you hold any other jobs in addition
3 to being the assistant sergeant-at-arms?
4 A. No.
5 Q. Have you ever worked for any alderman?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Which alderman?
8 A. Alderman Michelle Harris.
9 Q. And when did you work for Alderman
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 6 of 127
10 Harris?
11 A. Same time as I have been appointed to
12 the City Council, three years.
13 Q. So I think you said the only job that
14 you have is assistant sergeant-at-arms, right?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. In what capacity do you work for
17 Alderman Harris?
18 A. She's the chairman of the Rules and
19 Ethics Committee, so the sergeant-at-arms' office
20 is under the Rules and Ethics Committee.
21 Q. Would it be accurate to say that
22 Alderman Harris is the alderman who has oversight
23 over your job as assistant sergeant-at-arms?
24 A. Yes.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. How did you get your job as assistant
12 sergeant-at-arms?
13 A. I was appointed in 2013.
14 Q. And who appointed you?
15 A. City Council.
16 Q. Did someone nominate you, or how was it
17 that you came to be appointed?
18 A. Michelle Harris nominated me.
19 Q. At that time had you been doing other
20 work for Alderman Harris?
21 A. I had not.
22 Q. So how did it come to be that Alderman
23 Harris moved to appoint you to the position of
24 assistant sergeant-at-arms?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
10 A. Yesterday.
11 Q. Was anyone else present when you met
12 with the law department?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. Or just lawyers?
15 A. Just lawyers.
16 Q. You and lawyers from the law department;
17 is that correct?
18 A. Correct.
19 Q. Okay. Did you review any documents in
20 preparing for your deposition?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. Did any of those documents refresh your
23 memory about any events related to this case or
24 otherwise?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Which documents are those?
3 A. The answer.
4 Q. Okay. The answer to the complaint?
5 A. I think it was the answer.
6 Q. Are you talking about a court filing
7 that the City made in response to the complaint?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Any other documents?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 10 of 127
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Did you understand what I meant when I
3 said "entrance to the City Council chambers," when
4 I asked that question?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Again, I'll just reiterate, you are free
7 to tell me if you don't understand something in my
8 question. Okay?
9 A. Sure.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 14 of 127
YVer1f
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And is a City employee stationed at that
3 point that I just described in my last question?
4 A. Police are stationed at that point.
5 Q. So if someone wants to get to either the
6 second or the third floor entrance to the City
7 Council chambers, they have to pass through a
8 common point that is staffed by the Chicago Police
9 Department; is that correct?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 15 of 127
YVer1f
10 BY MR. TOPIC:
11 Q. Where is that elevator lobby located?
12 Is that on the second floor?
13 A. It is.
14 Q. And if someone wanted to go to the third
15 floor chamber of the City Council chamber, do they
16 have to pass through that elevator lobby, or can
17 they go a different way?
18 A. They would have to pass through the
19 elevator lobby.
20 Q. And if they were going to go from the
21 elevator lobby to the third floor entrance, do they
22 pass any kind of security station?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Okay. And where is that located?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
10 A. Entry point.
11 Q. Okay? And I'll call it the entry point,
12 and if ever you are confused about what I'm talking
13 about, just let me know, but I think that will be
14 easier.
15 Are you ever stationed at the entry
16 point for a City Council meeting?
17 A. No.
18 Q. Who is stationed at the entry point?
19 MS. SOBOTA: Object to foundation.
20 BY MR. TOPIC:
21 Q. Remember earlier I said if you did not
22 know the answer to a question, you could just tell
23 me that?
24 A. Sure.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. And where are you typically stationed at
12 10:00 a.m. the day of a City Council meeting?
13 A. In the chamber, the second floor
14 chamber, main floor.
15 Q. And do you typically remain in the main
16 chamber throughout the entirety of the City Council
17 meeting?
18 A. Typically, yes.
19 Q. Do you recall the May 2016 City Council
20 meeting?
21 A. I do not. We have a ton of groups come
22 through. I don't.
23 Q. Do you know whether during the May 2016
24 City Council meeting, at any point between
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Could you tell me what kinds of
12 documents you store on a computer?
13 MS. SOBOTA: Are you asking in connection with
14 his job duties?
15 BY MR. TOPIC:
16 Q. All of my questions will be in
17 connection with your work for the City of Chicago,
18 not anything separate than that.
19 A. Okay.
20 Q. Do you store any electronic documents in
21 connection with your job?
22 A. Could you specify as to what kind of
23 documents?
24 Q. You use a computer for your job, right?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Do you ever store documents in, like,
3 the My Documents folder or someplace like that on
4 your computer?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Do you have your documents on your
7 computer organized into folders?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Do you have folders organized by
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 22 of 127
10 specific meetings?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. And what documents do you commonly keep
13 in folders that are organized by meetings?
14 A. Are you saying "meetings" or "meanings"?
15 Q. I said meetings, as in City Council
16 meetings.
17 A. Okay.
18 Q. Let's back up. When I asked you a
19 question earlier about whether you have folders
20 based on meetings, did you understand me to mean
21 City Council meetings?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. So you have documents stored on your
24 computer that are organized at least in part by
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
10 meeting.
11 Q. I understand. Thank you. What is the
12 name of the folder that you referenced in your last
13 answer?
14 A. Seating charts, I believe.
15 Q. And at any time did you gather documents
16 from that folder and provide them to the lawyers
17 for the City?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. When did you do that?
20 A. I can't remember an exact date but some
21 time ago.
22 Q. Did you provide the entire contents of
23 that folder or only some of the documents of the
24 folder?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
10 A. I don't remember.
11 Q. Other than the seating charts that you
12 mentioned, are there any other documents in your
13 seating chart folder that pertain to the May or
14 June 2016 City Council meetings?
15 A. Specifically in my folder?
16 Q. Or I mean anywhere on your computer.
17 Are there any -- let me back way up for a second.
18 Are there any documents that you
19 provided to the lawyers for the City other than the
20 seating charts that you mentioned in your prior
21 answer?
22 MS. SOBOTA: From his computer?
23 BY MR. TOPIC:
24 Q. From your -- well, at all?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
1 A. No.
2 Q. Do you have any other documents other
3 than -- and that might be -- I may now mean paper
4 documents or electronic documents that relate to
5 the May or June 2016 City Council meetings?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Could you identify those documents as
8 best you can?
9 A. To the best of my knowledge, there were
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 26 of 127
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 document?
2 A. Perhaps a few weeks ago.
3 Q. The document that you saw, was it signed
4 and dated at the bottom?
5 A. I don't remember.
6 Q. Did you ever see a different version of
7 this document?
8 A. No, not that I can remember.
9 Q. Were you ever asked to comment about
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 31 of 127
10 this document?
11 A. Can you clarify?
12 Q. Did anyone ask you for any comments
13 about this document or about this policy?
14 A. No.
15 Q. To the best of your knowledge, did you
16 have any input into this policy which is Exhibit 1?
17 A. No.
18 Q. Do you know who did have input into
19 Exhibit 1?
20 A. I would assume Sergeant-at-Arms Alvin
21 Starks.
22 Q. No need to assume. If you don't know,
23 you can just tell me that you don't know.
24 Was there anyone that you know was
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
10 A. I am assuming.
11 Q. You don't know whether Mr. Starks had
12 any input into this document, correct?
13 A. Correct.
14 Q. And is there anyone that you are aware
15 of who you know had input into this document?
16 A. Not that I know of.
17 Q. Based on -- I'm going to ask you some
18 questions, and I understand that you might not be
19 involved in every aspect of what this policy
20 covers. So my questions are going to be about what
21 you do have involvement in, so you should consider
22 every question with that in mind.
23 Could you identify for me everything in
24 Exhibit No. 1 that is different from the policy or
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 BY MR. TOPIC:
2 Q. Did you understand my question?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Okay. Are you the person who is
5 primarily responsible for coordinating seat
6 reservations at City Council meetings?
7 A. Does that include sole responsibility or
8 shared responsibility?
9 Q. Either way. So are you -- let me ask it
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 34 of 127
YVer1f
YVer1f
10 reservations?
11 A. No.
12 Q. And how about the earlier portion of
13 2016, from January through April, was it the policy
14 that -- of the City Council that seat reservations
15 were granted on a first-come first-served basis?
16 A. No.
17 Q. That was not the policy?
18 A. Was it -- I'm sorry. Can you repeat the
19 question?
20 Q. Yeah. Let me try to rephrase it.
21 From January through April of 2016, for
22 Chicago City Council meetings -23 A. Sure.
24 Q. -- was the policy for seat reservations
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
1 first-come first-served?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. And from January through April of 2016,
4 were there any exceptions that you are aware of to
5 the first-come first-served policy for seat
6 reservations?
7 A. No.
8 Q. How about at all throughout the course
9 of your time in your job as assistant
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 37 of 127
YVer1f
1 policy?
2 A. Just trained by my predecessor.
3 Q. And the policy throughout your entire
4 tenure leading up to the time when Exhibit 1 was
5 initiated was -- and continuing, I guess, was
6 first-come first-served for seat reservations,
7 correct?
8 A. Correct.
9 Q. And are you aware of any exceptions at
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 38 of 127
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. On Exhibit 1, Section 3, does that -3 does the first sentence have your e-mail address on
4 it?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. And Exhibit 1 indicates under Section 3
7 that an individual or group wishing to reserve
8 gallery seats can do so by calling, and
9 there's a phone number, or e-mailing
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 41 of 127
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 A. I don't remember.
2 Q. Do you have more than one browser on
3 your computer?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Which browsers do you have?
6 A. Google Chrome and Internet Explorer.
7 Q. And do you clear the browsing histories
8 on your browsers?
9 A. No.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 49 of 127
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 A. Correct.
2 Q. How big was the line?
3 A. Are you asking for a quantity?
4 Q. Yes, as best you can tell.
5 A. I don't want to speculate.
6 Q. Can you recall an occasion where you saw
7 more than 20 people waiting in line to get into a
8 City Council meeting without seat reservations?
9 A. I cannot.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 53 of 127
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Oh, one other question. Exhibit 2, this
3 is just for the second floor; is that correct?
4 A. Correct.
5 Q. I see referenced third floor gallery
6 kind of in the middle towards the bottom. Do you
7 see that?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Does that indicate that 90 of the third
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 58 of 127
YVer1f
1 floor.
2 Even though it's identified here on the
3 chart here for these groups to go up to the third
4 floor, it's still not reserved. So for clarity, if
5 in the event there are already 60 or 70 people on
6 the third floor waiting for the meeting to begin
7 and the Posse Scholars and the Gates Scholars came
8 late and were not able to get into the third floor,
9 they would have to wait outside as well.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 59 of 127
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 A. Yeah.
2 Q. Now, for seats that are not reserved at
3 a City Council meeting, how are those seats given
4 to the public or to anyone to view?
5 A. They are not given. They are just open
6 seats, so they are out for anyone who wants to sit
7 in them.
8 Q. So if someone is the first person in
9 line for a City Council meeting without a
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 61 of 127
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Is Exhibit 4 an e-mail chain between you
3 and Claudia Chavez about guests for the May 18th
4 City Council meeting?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Is Ms. Chavez the person who creates
7 these charts, the different groups that are going
8 to be attending the meeting?
9 A. To my knowledge.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 64 of 127
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 BY THE WITNESS:
2 A. I don't.
3 BY MR. TOPIC:
4 Q. So but there was a 9:30 photo line, a
5 9:45 photo line, and an 11:00 a.m. photo line; is
6 that correct?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. Do you know approximately how long each
9 photo line was?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 67 of 127
10 A. No.
11 Q. And were seats for all of the people on
12 the topmost part of the e-mail on Exhibit 4
13 reserved on the second floor or third floor or
14 otherwise?
15 A. Seats are only reserved on the second
16 floor.
17 Q. And which people had reserved seats on
18 the second floor that are listed on Exhibit 4 on
19 the topmost part of the e-mail?
20 A. Can you clarify the question?
21 Q. I saw that you were comparing to
22 Exhibit 2; is that correct?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. And in order to determine which people
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And how far in advance was it that you
3 would try to get the reservations?
4 A. The Friday before.
5 Q. And when do you typically make the
6 seating chart? How far in advance of the meeting?
7 A. The day before the meeting.
8 Q. Do you know, is it typically, like, in
9 the morning or at the end of the day or did it
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 72 of 127
10 depend?
11 A. Typically, mid to late afternoon.
12 Q. And sometimes you would get requests for
13 seat reservations that occurred after you had
14 already made the seating chart; is that correct?
15 A. Correct.
16 Q. And am I right that you don't then
17 update the seating chart to reflect those
18 additional reservations?
19 A. Sometimes I do update and sometimes I
20 don't update.
21 Q. Do you know for the May 18th meeting
22 whether you updated the chart to reflect these sort
23 of evening before or afternoon before requests?
24 A. I don't remember.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 available or not?
2 A. No.
3 Q. Do you remember for the May 2016 meeting
4 whether the Chicago Police Department asked you
5 directly or indirectly whether there were available
6 seats for people waiting in line?
7 A. I don't remember.
8 Q. And same thing for the June 2016
9 meeting?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 74 of 127
10 A. I don't remember.
11 Q. In your experience -- in your
12 experience, are you always the person who the
13 police department asks whether there's available
14 seats, or are there other people to ask?
15 MS. SOBOTA: Objection to foundation.
16 BY THE WITNESS:
17 A. There are other people that they ask.
18 BY MR. TOPIC:
19 Q. Who are the people that the Chicago
20 Police Department asks or has asked about available
21 seating for a City Council meeting?
22 MS. SOBOTA: Object to foundation.
23 MR. TOPIC: He just said that he knows there's
24 other people. How does that not have foundation?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 A. I don't remember.
2 Q. Same question for the June meeting?
3 A. I don't remember.
4 Q. Are you aware of any communications in
5 which City Council staff and the police department
6 or the Mayor's Office looked at the number of
7 people who previously had been in line without
8 being able to get into a meeting to determine how
9 many seats should be allowed to be reserved at a
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 77 of 127
10 future meeting?
11 MS. SOBOTA: Could you read that back?
12 (WHEREUPON, the record was read by
13 the reporter.)
14 BY THE WITNESS:
15 A. No, not to my knowledge.
16 BY MR. TOPIC:
17 Q. If there was a discussion like that,
18 based on what your job duties are, would you expect
19 that you would be part of that discussion?
20 A. Probably.
21 (WHEREUPON, a certain document was
22 marked Deposition Exhibit No. 7, for
23 identification.)
24
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
1 BY MR. TOPIC:
2 Q. I'm going to hand you what I'm marking
3 as Exhibit 7, which is Bates stamped C 351. Take a
4 second.
5 Do you recognize Exhibit 7?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. And is this an e-mail chain that
8 includes you and the assistant to the Chairman
9 Ariel Reboyras about seats for the June 2016 City
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 78 of 127
10 Council meeting?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. And in this e-mail the assistant to
13 Chairman Reboyras was asking for seats for eight
14 guests; is that correct?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. Were you able to reserve eight seats for
17 Chairman Reboyras? I'm sure I'm butchering the
18 pronunciation.
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. You were able to reserve eight seats?
21 Sorry. That was -- yes, you were able to reserve
22 eight seats -23 A. Yes.
24 Q. -- in connection with Exhibit 7?
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. When you said, "We're full," what -- did
3 you know that you were full and then later realized
4 that you were not full, or how do you reconcile
5 that you told them that you were full but then they
6 got seats?
7 A. Well, I just moved some seats around.
8 That is pretty much it. I typically don't like to
9 scatter groups. I like to keep groups together.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 79 of 127
YVer1f
10 recognize Exhibit 8?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. And this is an e-mail chain between you
13 and Julia Ellis about seating for the June 2016
14 City Council meeting, correct?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. Who is Julia Ellis?
17 A. A former employee for the City Clerk.
18 Q. Do you know what her job is with the
19 City Clerk?
20 A. To the best of my knowledge, she was
21 legal.
22 Q. Had you interacted with Ms. Ellis in the
23 past in connection with your job?
24 A. Yes.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
10 been after.
11 Q. Which was -- which occurred later?
12 A. I think the Julia Ellis reservation -13 well, request came later.
14 Q. I know it came later than your e-mail
15 exchange with Chairman Reboyras in Exhibit 7.
16 Let's go back -- let me withdraw the question and
17 go back to Exhibit 7.
18 In your e-mail chain in Exhibit 7, you
19 said, "We're full. I will do my best to find
20 something. I will confirm later today." Do you
21 know when that confirmation occurred?
22 A. No, I do not.
23 Q. And do you know whether that
24 confirmation -- not the e-mail in Exhibit 7 but the
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
10 BY THE WITNESS:
11 A. No.
12 (WHEREUPON, a certain document was
13 marked Deposition Exhibit No. 11,
14 for identification.)
15 BY MR. TOPIC:
16 Q. I hand you Exhibit 11, which is Bates
17 stamped C 384. Do you recognize Exhibit 11?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. It's an e-mail chain with you and
20 various other people about reserved seating for
21 City of Chicago interns; is that correct?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. Would you turn to the third page of
24 Exhibit 11. There's an e-mail that is timestamped
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 BY MR. TOPIC:
2 Q. Okay. First question. Are you the
3 person who is on the video we just looked at?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Okay. Do you recall what meeting that
6 video was taken at?
7 A. I don't.
8 Q. And in that video you referenced
9 resolution groups; is that correct?
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 94 of 127
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. What is a resolution group?
12 A. Groups that are being honored before the
13 City Council or via a mayoral resolution and via
14 aldermanic resolutions.
15 Q. And where was that video taken? Let me
16 just back up for a second. I know you did not take
17 the video, but you can see where the video was
18 taken. So just go with me that that is an actual
19 video that was taken. In fact, let me just back up
20 even further.
21 Do you disagree that you made any of the
22 statements that we saw on that video?
23 A. I made those statements.
24 Q. And where were you when that video was
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
1 taken?
2 A. In the second floor elevator lobby near
3 the entry point.
4 Q. Do you know why you were at that
5 location at that time?
6 A. As any other time when I step out of the
7 chamber, I'm going to check on press conferences.
8 Q. So do you know whether you were checking
9 on press conferences at the time? What happened, I
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 95 of 127
10 guess, is my question?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. How did those circumstances come about?
13 A. Again, I don't want to speculate, but
14 the only reason why I would step out of the chamber
15 is to go check press conferences because my primary
16 role is to get folks in their seats in the chamber
17 on the day of Council.
18 Q. So why did you respond to those people
19 in that video?
20 A. Why did I respond to them?
21 Q. Correct.
22 A. They were suggesting that I would not
23 let them in.
24 Q. So do you know who the person was who
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
YVer1f
YVer1f
1 public?
2 A. I'm sorry. Could you restate that?
3 Q. Let me back up.
4 A. Okay.
5 (WHEREUPON, the video was played.)
6 BY MR. TOPIC:
7 Q. When you said "plenty of general public
8 available," what were you trying to communicate?
9 A. Well, I believe that the gentleman in
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 98 of 127
YVer1f
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Where?
12 A. In the elevator lobby on the second
13 floor.
14 Q. And just looking at what people were
15 wearing or signs they were holding, does that give
16 you any indication as to what meeting that likely
17 was?
18 A. I believe it may have been the June 22nd
19 meeting.
20 Q. And did you ever have any discussions or
21 were you aware of any discussions about the group
22 of people chanting in the elevator lobby that they
23 were not able to get into the June meeting?
24 A. No.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
10 BY MR. TOPIC:
11 Q. Sure. You are present in the Council
12 chamber for most City Council meetings, correct?
13 A. Correct.
14 Q. Has it ever happened that the chamber
15 was full at the beginning of the meeting and at
16 some point it was not full anymore before the
17 meeting ended?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Does that happen typically?
20 A. Sometimes, yes.
21 Q. And is there a process for communicating
22 to whomever is responsible for the security
23 entrance that there are now seats available?
24 A. Is there a process? I'm sorry.
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
YVer1f
1 STATE OF ILLINOIS )
2 ) SS:
3 COUNTY OF C O O K )
4 I, KRISTIN C. BRAJKOVICH, a Certified
5 Shorthand Reporter of said state, do hereby
6 certify:
7 That previous to the commencement of the
8 examination of the witness, the witness was duly
9 sworn to testify the whole truth concerning the
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 102 of 127
10 matters herein;
11 That the foregoing deposition transcript
12 was reported stenographically by me,
13 was thereafter reduced to typewriting under my
14 personal direction and constitutes a true record
15 of the testimony given and the proceedings had;
16 That the said deposition was taken
17 before me at the time and place specified;
18 That I am not a relative or employee
19 or attorney or counsel, nor a relative or
20 employee of such attorney or counsel for any of
21 the parties hereto, nor interested directly or
22 indirectly in the outcome of this action.
23 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereunto set my
24 hand and affix my seal of office at Chicago,
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
1 I N D E X
2 WITNESS EXAMINATION
3 LAMAR CARL BROWN
4 By Mr. Topic 3
5
6
7 E X H I B I T S
8 NUMBER PAGE
9 Deposition Exhibit
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 104 of 127
10 No. 1 29
11 No. 2 55
12 No. 3 59
13 No. 4 62
14 No. 5 67
15 No. 6 69
16 No. 7 76
17 No. 8 79
18 No. 9 82
19 No. 10 82
20 No. 11 87
21 No. 12 90
22
23
24
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
11:00
65:5 66:5
24:14
25:5,23
26:22
29:13
32:2,7,12
34:3,9,20
35:7,13,
21 36:3
39:8
50:9,15
51:10
56:3
57:14
65:21
68:20
73:3,8
75:22
77:9
79:13
80:3 81:3
84:19
85:18,23
86:9
88:23
91:7
12
90:20,23
91:3
(30)
57:19
(60)
57:18
15
37:19
39:6
56:16
17th
70:6
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 108 of 127
29:11,15
30:16,19
31:24
32:5
36:19
37:4,15,
17,18,22,
23 38:4,
8,17,18,
20 39:11,
15 40:2,6
44:2
49:17,18
50:18
53:21
92:22
18
56:3
69:12,20
18th
63:3
69:15
70:6
71:21
72:4
1L-2
7:11
21
2
2
10
14:14
55:21
56:1,3,8,
14,20,23
57:2
66:22
67:2,6,10
53:7
82:21
83:1,4
10:00
18:9,12
60:12
64:7,14,
18 72:5,9
99:3
20
52:7 53:7
2013
6:13
11
68:1
87:13,16,
17,24
114
69:6
2016
18:19,23
19:8,13
22:3,21
23:2,6
59:21
213
27:6,10,
13,16
28:24
21st
90:5
22
59:14,23
2:08
82:17
59:23,24
61:15,19
24
98:2
66:12,18
67:1,9
74:14,17
2:59
89:10
40
8:5
44
28:23
48
3
14:15
40:2,6
50:17
59:3,6,8,
10,16
61:15
30
38:1
40:11
48-hour
39:20
4:13
91:10
8:5 29:13
5
302
90:24
5
351
77:3
67:21,24
68:4 70:4
357
79:6
384
87:17
390
82:10
69:2,6,9
70:5
394
83:1
60
54:24
58:5
39th
88:9
3rd
57:18
22nd
59:20
98:18
23
7
76:22
77:3,5,24
78:22
81:8,15,
17,18,24
4
4
62:16,20,
21,24
63:2
64:5,13
70
58:5
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 109 of 127
ability
3:22
access
100:10
accommodate
78:16,19
80:13
accurate
3:19,22
5:21
active
12:8
activities
9:23
82:6,9,12
actual
93:18
57:9
addition
5:2
90
99
27:9
9:00
19:1
9:30
65:4 66:4
9:45
65:5 66:5
A
a.m.
18:9,12
19:1
60:12
64:7,14,
18 65:4,5
66:5
72:5,9
88:1 99:3
Abigail
additional
58:16
68:12,15,
19 70:9
71:18
78:16
89:18
90:14
address
40:3
44:18
admission
32:11
advance
10:3,4
18:6
63:14
70:24
71:2,6
affidavit
9:10
afternoon
71:11,23
analysis
46:6
areas
53:20
ahead
29:18
62:20
74:3
90:24
98:2
analyze
45:3
Ariel
77:9
answers
3:19,22
49:14
arrangement
s
28:14
anticipate
84:9
arrive
58:12
anticipatin
g
83:13,18
84:24
85:15
arrived
86:10,16,
20
Airbnb
84:1
alderman
5:5,7,8,
9,17,22
6:9,20,22
44:11
68:10
91:6,15
aldermanic
93:14
aldermen
9:20
27:12
28:2 55:9
56:17
62:5
70:22
allocated
26:9
60:19
62:2
90:15
anymore
99:16
arriving
86:13
asks
73:13,20
apologize
52:19
72:1
applied
36:20
appoint
6:23
appointed
5:11
6:13,14,
17
approvals
39:1
aspect
31:19
assistant
4:21 5:3,
14,23
6:11,24
7:14 9:17
36:9
37:10
77:8,12
assume
4:9
30:20,22
assuming
31:8,10
allowed
55:1,6
56:17
76:9
86:12
approximate
ly
53:12
65:14
66:8
allowing
86:23
95:1
April
35:13,21
36:3
38:17
attempting
45:11
48:19
57:23
Alvin
6:6 30:20
31:2
area
53:18
attend
44:12
attempted
48:13
49:9,13
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 110 of 127
availabilit
y
50:21
aware
31:14
36:4
37:9,14
40:15
42:14
43:13
48:23
54:1,6,10
72:6,11
76:4
86:15
98:21
100:7,13
B
B-e-i-t-z
88:2
B-r-o-w-n
3:11
back
7:2
13:10,15
18:7
19:21
21:18
22:13
24:17
27:21
29:6
33:17
37:15
46:19
49:14
53:19
55:24
61:4 65:3
70:2,13
74:17
76:11
78:12,14
81:16,17
85:15
87:7 88:6
93:16,19
97:3
100:1,10
based
21:20
31:17
32:4
50:20
60:17
61:20
76:18
86:5
88:11
96:20
basis
34:15,17,
23 35:15
42:5
Bates
29:11
62:20
67:24
69:6 77:3
79:6
82:10
83:1
87:16
90:24
92:22
began
75:23
begin
58:6
beginning
99:15
browsing
48:7,11
begins
17:19
building
42:22
43:1
behalf
90:10
butchering
77:17
Beitz
88:1,7,8,
15 89:5
big
52:2 62:4
C-a-r-l
3:10
bit
56:11
cadets
64:5,8
body
45:13
84:7
85:11
call
16:3,8,11
40:22
bottom
30:4 57:6
65:3
boxes
56:10,12
break
46:14
69:22
92:8
bring
62:1,2,6
74:13
chain
63:2
68:6,9
69:10
77:7
79:12
81:18
87:19
chairman
5:18
77:8,13,
17 81:8,
15 82:13
chairs
28:1
called
3:4
calling
40:8,18
calls
60:13
61:22
capacity
5:16
80:17
97:18,19
care
28:15
bringing
62:5
90:18
Carl
3:3,10
Brown
3:3,10,13
case
8:23
92:14
browser
47:24
48:2
categorize
24:4
browsers
cetera
9:21
chamber
12:6,7
14:24
15:15
17:23,24
18:1,13,
14,16
19:2,11,
15 27:5,
11 51:4
62:7
86:20,24
89:23
90:1,3
94:7,14,
16 95:22
96:12,13,
14,16
97:11,17
99:12,14
100:3,9,
11
chambers
12:14
13:3,13,
17 14:7
15:9
74:10,15
change
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 111 of 127
chart
24:13
56:2,6,7
58:3,18
59:8,11
61:12
67:5
71:6,14,
17,22
charts
22:6
23:14
24:6,11,
20 60:18
63:7
Chavez
63:3,6,11
check
17:13
20:6 92:2
94:7,15
checking
94:8
Chicago
14:8 15:2
17:9
20:17
29:12
35:22
36:20
43:9 46:5
54:22
72:12,23
73:4,19
74:21
75:8
87:21
95:5
chief
91:6
Chrome
48:6
circumstanc
es
26:13,24
94:12
City
4:18 5:12
6:15 7:16
9:7,19
10:3,6,
10,12,14,
17,21
11:1,19
12:1,4,14
13:3,12,
13,17
14:2,6,24
15:3,8,15
16:16
17:8,11,
15,19,23
18:4,6,8,
12,16,19,
24 19:2,
5,8,11
20:17
21:15,21
22:1,4,
17,21
23:2,6,7,
9,17
24:9,14,
19 25:5,
15,20,23
26:1,5,
10,22
27:2,5,17
28:1,5,22
29:12
31:5
32:1,7
33:6,11,
14 34:3,
11,21
35:7,14,
22 36:20
39:14
40:15,23,
24 41:1,
8,9 42:15
43:2,20
44:4
45:15
46:9,12
47:1,10,
22 48:13,
19 49:1,
5,9,16
50:6
51:6,10,
17,22
52:8,11,
16 53:11,
23 54:2,
8,12,15,
22 55:2,7
56:2,7,
23,24
57:13,20
58:12
59:7,13,
20 60:3,9
61:20
62:11
63:4,14
64:2,19
65:1,15
68:20
69:12,20
72:15
73:21
74:10,14,
23 75:19,
22 76:5
77:9
clarify
4:6 22:22
28:7
30:11
34:12
38:10,14
51:19
66:20
87:5
clarity
58:4
Claudia
63:3
clear
4:5 22:23
48:7
Clerk
79:17,19
commonly
21:12
communicate
58:21
72:24
75:14
92:5 97:8
communicate
d
100:17
communicate
s
100:10
communicati
ng
95:23
99:21
communicati
on
12:8 75:7
communicati
ons
75:11
76:4
compare
67:9
column
63:18
64:14
comparing
66:21
comment
30:9
comparison
67:4
comments
30:12
committee
5:19,20
28:1
common
13:22
14:8
28:10
58:15
70:8
72:22
complained
26:3,8
complaint
9:4,7
complete
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 112 of 127
concerns
43:4,10
conclusion
64:1
conduct
46:6
conferences
10:2
12:9,11
17:13
94:7,9,15
confirm
74:24
81:20
confirmatio
n
81:21,24
82:1
confused
16:12
connection
19:17
20:13,17,
21 75:19
77:24
79:23
88:12
contact
41:10,13
contacted
41:7
contacting
41:1
contents
23:22
context
7:5
10:16,22
11:22
continuing
37:5
control
100:10,17
coordinates
32:22
coordinatin
g
33:5,11
correct
3:16 7:8,
9,15
8:17,18
13:11
14:9,22
22:1,21
25:17
31:12,13
32:19,20
34:24
37:7,8
41:17,18
42:6,7
43:14,21
45:4
52:1,14,
17 53:22
57:3,4
59:15
60:12
62:13
64:15,16,
20 65:1,2
66:6,22
68:7,13
69:9
70:19
71:14,15
75:20
77:14
78:17
79:14
80:3,4,
10,14,15,
18 81:4
83:8 84:3
86:14
87:21
89:12,16,
17 90:15
91:12
92:3 93:9
94:21
99:12,13
100:3,19,
20
Council
4:19 5:12
6:15 9:19
10:3,4,6,
10,12,14,
17,21
11:1,19
12:1,5,
14,15
13:3,13,
17 14:7,
24 15:3,
9,15
16:16
17:8,11,
16,19,23
18:4,6,8,
12,16,19,
24 19:2,
5,8,11,14
21:15,21
64:2,7,
14,19
65:1,15
68:20
69:12,21
72:15
73:21
74:10,14,
23 75:19,
22 76:5
77:10
79:14
80:3,13
84:17
85:13
86:2,9,
19,24
88:17,23
91:8
93:13
94:17
99:6,11,
12
counsel
17:1
29:16
count
53:4
couple
92:9
court
9:6
covers
31:20
create
59:16
creates
63:6
creating
31:1,4,8
criteria
49:3
50:23
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
deny
34:14
cut
29:11
denying
34:18
cutoff
70:15,20
department
8:2,4,9,
12,16
14:9 15:2
43:9 46:6
72:13,23
73:4,13,
20 74:8,
22 75:2,8
76:5 95:5
D
dangerous
45:18
dangers
42:23
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 113 of 127
date
23:20
50:2,3
dated
30:4
day
7:14
12:4,14
13:13
17:11
18:12
70:10
71:7,9
94:17
decision
33:15
34:10,13
decisions
34:4,5
dedicated
23:4,9
definition
44:14
delete
20:4
delineate
33:24
depend
20:4
71:10
85:12
depicted
97:24
98:6
DEPONENT
100:24
deposed
3:12
deposition
7:20,23
8:4,20
29:15
55:21
59:3
62:16
67:21
69:2
76:22
79:2
82:6,21
87:13
90:20
description
41:21
42:10
43:7
44:13
45:2 67:9
details
9:23
determine
46:23
47:7,9
49:4
50:24
66:24
76:8
determining
45:14
100:2
differences
37:16
directed
40:24
directly
58:20
72:18
73:5
director
68:10
disagree
93:21
discretion
34:18
discussed
84:20
87:2
document
23:5
29:14,20,
22 30:1,
3,7,10,13
31:1,4,8,
12,15
55:20
56:22
59:2
62:15
67:20
69:1
76:21
79:1
82:5,20
87:12
90:19
documents
8:19,22
9:2,9
12:11
20:8,12,
20,23
21:2,3,6,
12,23
23:7,15,
23 24:1,
3,12,18
25:2,4,7,
10,12,18,
22
dogs
12:7
discussing
27:1
draws
84:15
depositions
9:13
discussion
76:17,19
describe
26:12
discussions
10:24
drivers
84:16
85:12
duly
3:1,4
duties
9:16 12:4
13:11
20:14
38:5,6,20
76:18
duty
9:24
E
e-mail
19:17,20,
22 20:6
22:8
40:3,22
63:2,11,
13 64:13
66:12,19
68:6,9
69:9,10
77:7,12
79:8,12
80:1
81:14,18,
24 82:3
83:6,10
87:19,24
91:22
92:6
e-mailing
40:9,18
e-mails
20:3
earlier
16:21
21:19
34:8
35:12
64:19
86:20
97:20
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 114 of 127
effect
37:18,23
40:14
44:2
49:17,18
53:21
70:14
electronic
20:8,20
25:4
elevator
15:6,11,
16,19,21
18:3,5
94:2
98:12,22
Ellis
79:13,16,
22 80:1,
5,12,20
81:2,6,12
89:14,19,
22 90:8
Ellis'
82:2
employee
14:2
40:24
41:1,8,9
79:17
employees
27:18
28:1
empty
56:9,10,
12
encompassin
g
49:19
end
19:1 71:9
99:6
ended
65:1
99:17
engage
9:24
ensure
9:18
10:6,10
11:19
67:17
ensuring
10:24
11:24
enter
15:8
entire
23:22
37:3
entirety
18:16
entrance
12:13,21,
23 13:3,
12,16,20,
21,24
14:6,23
15:21
18:1
99:23
100:18
entrances
13:19
entry
16:6,8,
10,11,15,
18 17:7,
11 94:3
estimate
53:6
Ethics
5:19,20
evaluating
43:3
Evelyn
69:10
evening
7:13
71:23
event
57:21
58:5
events
8:23 98:5
eventually
92:2
exact
23:20
EXAMINATION
3:6
examined
3:5
examples
41:6
47:15
exception
37:11
exceptions
35:1,8
36:4 37:9
exchange
81:15
83:6
Excuse
55:3
exercise
68:1
Exhibit
29:11,15
30:16,19
31:24
32:5
36:19
37:4,15,
17,18,22,
23 38:4,
8,17,18,
20 39:11,
15 40:2,6
44:2
49:17,18
50:18
53:21
55:21
56:1,3,8,
14,20,23
57:2
59:3,6,8,
10,16
61:15
62:16,20,
21,24
63:2
64:5,13
66:12,18,
22 67:1,
2,6,9,10,
21,24
68:4
69:2,6,9
74:14,17
76:22
77:3,5,24
78:22
79:2,6,7,
10 81:6,
8,15,17,
18,24
82:6,9,
12,21
83:1,4
87:13,16,
17,24
90:20,23
91:3
Exhibits
70:4
expect
76:18
expectation
s
70:22
expected
58:16
expecting
64:17,23
experience
32:5
60:18
61:20
73:11,12
75:7
85:8,9
86:5,11
88:12
99:5
explain
9:16 22:9
Explorer
48:6
expressed
87:1
F
fact
55:8
93:19
fair
51:3
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 115 of 127
filled
74:20
filling
89:24
filming
97:10
find
81:7,19
first-come
34:15,16,
23 35:2,
9,15
36:1,5,11
37:6,12
41:17,20
42:5,8,18
firstserved
34:15,17,
23 35:2,
9,15
36:1,5,11
37:6,12
41:17,20
42:5,9,18
fix
12:19
floor
13:14,20,
21,24
14:6,23
15:12,15,
21 16:1
17:22
18:13,14
19:12
27:5,8,10
29:8
32:9,10,
13 39:7
43:2
50:20
53:20,21
54:4,7,
11,16,17
57:3,5,
10,13,18,
20,22,24
58:1,4,6,
8,17
59:19
61:3
66:13,16,
18 67:2,
7,14 90:3
94:2
98:13
floors
46:9
focus
44:21
54:3
Foerstner
83:7
folder
21:3
22:3,5,7,
12,14,15,
17,20
23:1,3,5,
7,8,12,
16,23,24
24:2,8,
13,15
folders
19:23
20:1
21:7,9,
13,19
folks
15:7
74:13
94:16
forget
33:21
form
11:3,4,7
12:17,19
14:18
15:4
32:23
43:15
65:17
87:3 96:3
99:7
forward
34:13
83:12
found
48:21
foundation
16:19
17:2 55:4
73:15,22,
24 74:2
84:4
free
13:6
Friday
71:4
front
13:20,21
89:10
full
75:16
78:2,3,4,
5,10,11
81:19
91:12
96:14,17
99:15,16
full-time
4:24
32:11
40:17
54:19
90:2
97:7,16
gentleman
97:9
get all
42:21
give
3:18,22
47:14
89:18
98:15
future
76:10
G
Gail
88:1,7,8,
15
gallery
29:8
32:13
40:8
50:20
57:5,10,
18,20,24
61:3
Gates
57:18
58:7,11
gather
23:15
gave
7:3 11:17
28:24
83:2
gazed
35:5
general
9:20 15:7
16:6 22:5
23:7
27:12,14
good
36:18
Google
46:22
48:6
Google.com.
45:21
grant
33:16
34:5,10,
13 69:14
granted
34:22
35:15
68:16
90:14
Great
46:20
group
40:7
41:21
42:10
43:7
44:10,13,
15,17
45:2,15,
18 46:4,
21,23
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 116 of 127
47:4,9,
13,15
49:11
50:19
51:1 64:2
65:5
74:11,12,
19 89:15,
21 90:12,
14,15
93:11
98:21
groups
10:13,19,
20 18:21
42:22
43:20
44:20
45:10
46:11
47:7,8,21
48:12,18,
24 49:4,
8,15,21
50:5,10,
14 51:3
54:18,22
57:23
58:3,16,
21 61:5,
9,11
62:1,2,5
63:7
64:12,22
65:9,12
67:15,17
74:13
75:16
78:9
86:15
89:23
93:9,12
95:19,20,
21 96:2,
8,10
guess
37:5
86:17
94:10
guests
63:3
77:14
78:23
80:13,20
81:2
91:16
H
6:9,18,
20,23 7:6
heard
47:12
Heath
68:9
74:20,21
heavy
83:13,18
84:10
85:22
held
4:22
Hall
4:18
helps
44:19
hand
29:10
56:1 59:6
62:19
67:24
77:2 79:5
82:9,24
87:16
92:15
histories
48:7
handed
38:16,18
home-share
83:14,19
84:1,10,
15,21
85:1,6,
18,22
86:8,10,
13,18
handing
69:5
90:23
happen
8:6 99:19
happened
94:9
99:14
hard
41:5
53:15
56:11
Harris
5:8,10,
17,22
history
48:11
hold
5:2
holding
98:15
honored
62:5,6
93:12
99:2
hour
17:19
18:4
hours
38:1
40:11
hunch
47:11
49:6
38:8,11
39:21,23
implementin
g
39:11
inbox
20:7
idea
88:14
95:15
identificat
ion
29:16
55:22
59:4
62:17
67:22
69:3
76:23
79:3
82:7,22
87:14
90:21
include
27:11
29:1 33:7
included
22:5
27:13
includes
13:12
77:8
indication
98:16
indications
49:10
identified
58:2
74:14
indirectly
72:19
73:5
identify
24:4 25:7
31:23
32:4
37:21
44:19
46:21
52:14
53:15
61:15
92:21
individual
40:7
impacted
38:7
individuals
52:15
inform
75:8
informally
70:22
information
44:17
informed
82:13
implement
38:22
41:19
42:1,8,18
implemented
initially
62:2
initiated
37:5
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
investigati
ng
50:5
inside
18:1
52:16
involved
31:1,4,7,
9,19
32:18
instances
41:7
54:1,6,10
interacted
79:22
interchange
able
36:15
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 117 of 127
interest
87:1
89:24
involvement
31:21
issue
44:22
87:2
issues
39:17
43:14,21
45:4
J
interested
14:12
interferes
4:2
interfering
3:21
intern
54:22
Internet
48:6
interns
55:1,6
62:4
87:21
88:16,17,
20 89:2,
12,20
90:9,11,
17
introduced
86:2
introducing
84:3
January
35:13,21
36:3
job
4:20,22,
24 5:13,
23 6:7,11
7:14 9:16
13:11
19:18
20:14,21,
24 28:4
31:9
36:9,16
38:5,6,20
76:18
79:18,23
88:7,12
jobs
5:2
jog
47:17
98:1
JROTC
64:5,8
Julia
79:13,16
81:12
89:14,19,
21 90:8
June
19:4,8,13
24:14
25:5,19,
23 26:22
32:2,7,16
33:18,22
34:3,9,20
35:3,7
39:7,24
50:9
51:10
59:7,14,
20 60:10
72:7 73:8
76:2 77:9
79:13
80:3,21,
23 81:2
84:19
85:3,18,
23 86:9
88:21,23
90:5 91:7
98:18,23
jurisdictio
n
46:8
Justin
68:9
74:20
K
kind
15:22
20:22
28:11,17,
18
kinds
9:23
20:11
42:21
large
52:10
largest
51:16
54:14
knew
41:10
knowledge
6:8 20:1
25:9 26:2
30:15
32:15,17
43:5 49:7
51:15
61:1 63:9
68:17,18
69:18
75:12
76:15
78:20
79:20
80:11
85:20
late
58:8
71:11
knowledgeab
le
42:15
lead
74:19
Laurino
88:9
law
7:7,10,
12,13,16
8:2,4,9,
12,16
lawyers
8:14,15,
16 23:16
24:9,19
25:20,24
leading
18:4 34:9
37:4
L
L-a-m-a-r
3:10
leads
74:11,12
lack
85:13
89:4
leave
63:17,21
64:2,23
67:16,17
Lamar
3:3,10
legal
79:21
lamar.
brown@
cityofchica
go.org
40:10
legend
67:10
language
legislation
legislated
83:21,22
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 118 of 127
living
85:12
lobby
15:6,11,
16,19,21
18:3,5
90:3 94:2
98:12,22
locate
44:19
located
15:11,24
location
94:5
long
4:22 8:3
20:3 66:8
looked
46:22
47:15
48:12,18
49:5,8
76:6 93:3
lot
84:16
90:17
M
mad
53:1
made
9:7 34:5,
10 37:12
70:6
71:14
92:1
93:21,23
95:20
magnetomete
rs
16:6
main
17:22
18:14,15
19:12,14
90:2,3
make
10:3,16
12:6,7,9
42:23
52:21,22
67:4 71:5
90:5,7
95:18
makes
33:15
34:4
manner
11:11
Margaret
88:9
marked
29:15
55:21
59:3
62:16
67:21
69:2
76:22
79:2
82:6,21
87:13
90:20
marking
29:10
56:1
62:19
69:5 77:2
79:5
82:24
Mary
74:16
75:4
matter
38:8,21
39:2,6,22
42:2
97:16
mayor
25:15
65:13
84:2,6
Mayor's
10:2,5,9
11:18,23
59:1 61:3
74:6,9
75:5,9
76:6
mayoral
93:13
meaning
85:11
meanings
21:14
means
12:24
60:20
64:17
meant
measure
15:8
42:19,20
medication
4:1
meet
7:22 8:1,
3 10:13
meeting
10:12,18
12:5,15
15:3
16:16
17:8,12,
16,19
18:4,6,
12,17,20,
24 19:1,
5,8,13
22:4,18,
21 23:2,
4,6,10
25:19,23
26:5,10
28:6
32:12,16
34:11
38:1,9,
12,19
39:15,18
40:12
46:12
47:1 50:4
51:7,11,
18,22
52:8,11,
12 53:13,
23 54:2,
8,12,16
55:18
56:23
57:13
58:6,22
59:7,14,
20 60:3,
9,22
61:20
62:4,12
63:4,8,14
64:8,11,
14,19
65:1,15,
21 69:12,
16,21
70:6,10
71:6,7,21
72:4,5,8,
10,15
73:3,9,21
74:23
75:23
76:2,8,10
77:10
78:23
79:14
80:3,14
81:3
83:11,12,
21,23
84:19
85:3,18,
23 86:3,
4,9 87:2
88:21,24
91:8 93:5
98:16,19,
23 99:15,
17
meetings
10:1,3,7,
11,22
11:2,17,
20,22
12:1
13:13
18:8
21:10,13,
14,15,16,
20,21
22:1 23:8
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 119 of 127
mess
56:13
met
8:8,11
Michelle
5:8 6:18
7:6
mid
71:11
middle
57:6
mind
31:22
83:13
87:7
minute
62:21
minutes
8:5 92:9
mischaracte
rize
44:24
misundersto
od
27:23
moment
96:13,16
97:14
month
27:17
38:18
months
24:7
morning
71:9
move
34:12
57:22
moved
6:23 7:2
78:7
moves
83:12
numbers
90:16
office
5:19
10:3,5,9
11:18,24
59:1 61:3
74:6,9
75:5,9
76:6
O
N
named
23:5
names
45:10
74:1
nature
49:22
75:6
needed
45:2
news
46:3
nominate
6:16
nominated
6:18
Northwester
n
83:7
note
58:17
noted
91:10
number
27:11,16
28:24
29:11
40:9
52:15
53:20
54:14
62:7 76:6
88:19
89:1
oath
3:16
object
11:3
12:17
14:10,18
15:4
16:19
17:1,5
32:23
43:15
55:4
65:17
73:22
84:4 87:3
96:3 99:7
objected
11:7
objecting
74:2
objection
11:4
60:13
61:22
65:23
73:15
occasion
17:10
51:5,8,20
52:6
occur
41:4 82:2
occurred
71:13
81:11,21
occurrence
62:3 70:8
officer
15:2
officers
17:9
72:17
74:3
official
44:6
Officially
53:24
open
57:21
60:5,21
61:2
62:11
83:11
operate
72:17
operates
72:13
opportunity
7:3
order
9:18
41:19
42:8,17
66:24
ordinance
83:24
84:1
85:14
ordinances
84:2
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 120 of 127
P-o-l-a-ce-k
88:2
p.m.
82:17
packed
91:11
paper
25:3
part
21:24
66:12,19
68:7
76:19
83:10
part-time
7:11
pass
12:11
14:7
15:1,16,
18,22
38:15
72:14
passed
39:12,15
past
13:23
45:8
75:11
79:23
86:5
98:14,22
99:2,5
100:2,10,
17,19
pay
7:16
people's
38:6
people
9:14
11:1,24
25:14
26:15,16,
24 32:14
37:19
42:21,24
44:4
51:6,11,
17,21
52:7,12
53:4,5,8,
13,16,17
55:12,17
58:5,16
61:18,19
62:1,6,
10,12
64:18,22
66:11,17,
24 68:19
69:15,19
72:3,8,
14,20
73:6,14,
17,19,24
74:2,23
75:1,9
76:7
78:19
86:1,7,
11,20,23
87:20
88:11
92:6
94:18
95:1,12,
24 96:24
97:19,20
perform
9:24
period
33:18
permanent
28:2
permitted
28:3,9,12
person
32:21
33:4,10
34:10
41:10
57:23
60:8,21
61:5 63:6
73:12
74:17
93:3
94:24
personally
17:15
26:4,9
100:16
pertain
24:13
pertaining
64:24
pertains
38:20
photo
25:10,11,
13 65:10,
11,13,16,
22 66:4,
5,9 74:15
phrased
87:6
15:2 17:9
43:9 46:5
72:12,23
73:4,13,
20 74:3,
8,21
75:2,8
76:5 95:5
policies
27:1 32:6
pictures
25:15
place
17:20
43:19
44:3
55:13
places
63:16,19
play
95:7
played
92:23
95:10,16
97:5 98:3
plenty
97:7
point
13:22
14:3,4,8,
11,24
15:1
16:6,9,
10,11,16,
18 17:7,
11 18:24
90:4 94:3
99:16
Peter
88:2,14
89:11,19
90:6
Polacek
88:2,14
89:5,19
phone
police
14:4,8
policy
29:13
30:13,16
31:19,24
33:21
34:14,16,
21 35:2,
9,13,17,
24 36:5,
10,14,20,
23 37:1,
3,12,17,
22 38:11,
15 39:11
40:14,15
41:16,20
42:2,4,9,
18 43:22,
24 50:8
68:10
70:14
portion
34:9
35:12
pose
45:12
46:4
posed
42:23
46:1,11
posing
46:23
position
6:23
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 121 of 127
practice
15:7
20:2,5
34:22
36:12,14
72:22
86:23
practices
32:1,7
predecessor
37:2
prefaced
53:10
prefer
28:19
Preparation
12:6
prepare
7:19 8:4
12:6
prepared
56:20
preparing
7:22 8:20
99:11
president
88:8
press
10:2
12:9,10
17:13
94:7,9,15
pretty
4:4 78:8
previously
76:7
89:14
primarily
32:21
33:5
primary
94:15
prior
9:13
24:20
36:19,24
37:17
38:17
40:14
43:22,23
44:2
49:14,17,
23 50:7
53:21
70:14
84:12,18
85:8
pro
88:8
presence
83:13,18
84:10,24
85:22
problem
12:19
35:6
52:20
69:23
present
8:11
problems
39:10
procedure
9:19
72:23
100:8
process
32:19
43:3,12,
19 44:3,
6,7,9
86:3
99:21,24
100:7,13
produced
92:13
pursuant
9:19
push
78:14
pushed
78:12
put
58:16
Q
projector
92:17
quantity
52:3
pronunciati
on
77:18
question
4:5,8,9,
13,14
11:5,6,
10,15
12:19
13:4,8
14:3,13,
17,20,21
16:22
17:5
21:19
22:11
27:23
28:7,8
31:22
32:3 33:2
34:17
35:4,19
36:18
40:19,20
43:17
44:1
51:19
52:21
55:14
57:2
60:15,17
61:1,13
provide
23:16,22
24:3
25:20,21,
24 91:15
provided
24:1,9,19
25:10
91:21
public
9:20
26:18
27:12,15
29:12
32:1,6
36:19
40:17
42:22,24
45:13,15
57:23
60:4
83:11
90:2
96:13,15,
23 97:1,
65:18,20
66:20
72:7 76:2
81:16
86:17
87:5
88:22
90:4,6
93:2
94:10
99:9
questions
4:4 20:16
26:15,17
29:20
31:18,20
52:19
62:23
68:3
92:15
95:9
100:22
R
radios
12:7
Ramirezrosa
91:7
Ramirezrosa's
91:16
range
53:7
Rarely
18:5
read
76:11,12
87:8
100:23
reading
79:8 87:7
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 122 of 127
reason
39:5 45:2
80:16
86:18,21
94:14
95:24
96:10
68:4 77:5
79:7,10
83:4
87:17
91:3
98:5,8
recollectio
n
88:19,24
reconcile
78:4
record
70:2
76:12
87:8
92:21
reasonable
53:6
records
48:10
Reboyras
77:9,13,
17 81:8,
15 82:13
refer
16:4
28:11,13,
15,16
67:2
recall
18:19
52:6 70:4
75:2 93:5
receive
33:13
received
43:7 82:2
recent
50:3
recently
7:2
recess
46:17
70:1
92:11
recognize
56:3 59:8
62:24
reference
61:9
95:18,20
referenced
23:12
39:21
57:5 82:1
93:8
referencing
22:7
96:7,10
referring
50:8 85:9
reflect
71:17,22
refresh
8:22
82:12
regard
32:1
90:17
regular
62:3
research
50:10,14
remind
48:12
reiterate
11:13
13:6
repeat
32:3
35:4,18
55:14
88:22
relate
25:4
rephrase
35:20
related
8:23
25:19,22
84:20
reporter
76:13
87:9
remain
18:15
remaining
29:4
remember
16:21
17:17
19:3,5,6,
7,16
23:20
24:10
26:20
30:5,8
46:22
47:2,16,
24 48:1
50:4,5,
13,16
51:12,14,
16 53:12
54:15
55:19
58:14
71:24
73:3,7,10
76:1,3
85:24
87:7
90:16
91:17,19,
request
44:11
55:15
68:15
80:9
81:13
91:5 92:1
requested
10:13,21
12:10
41:22
43:4,20
47:4,21
50:11,14
68:12
69:11
70:16
requesting
43:7 44:4
45:3
48:24
49:16
80:2
90:10
requests
33:13
55:10
70:5,9
71:12,23
researched
49:21
researching
48:24
49:15
reservation
32:18
33:16
34:6,19
55:17
60:10
70:16
81:12
86:19
89:22
reservation
s
28:20,22
29:2,5,8
32:14,22
33:6,11,
14 34:22
35:3,10,
14,24
36:6,11,
24 37:6,
13,20
41:16,22
42:4,9
43:4,8,
14,21
44:4 45:3
46:24
47:21
49:1
50:11,15
51:18
52:8,13
53:14,16,
17 54:15
55:11,12,
16 69:14
70:5,9,23
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 123 of 127
reserve
34:11
40:7,17
41:1,7
47:4
48:13,19
49:5,9
56:18
77:16,20,
21 80:20
89:11,23
reserved
26:14,15
27:17,24
32:11
39:6 47:4
48:13
52:16
53:23
54:3,8,
11,24
55:1,7,9
56:2,6,9,
15 57:10,
12 58:4
59:11,19
60:2,20
61:12,14,
16 66:13,
15,17
67:1
68:11
69:12,19
76:9
78:22
80:2,5
81:1
85:17
87:20
88:20
89:1 90:1
91:5
95:21
96:24
97:20
reserves
50:18
reserving
41:13
42:10
resolution
63:17,22
64:1,5,24
67:16,18
91:14
93:9,11,
13 95:18,
20 96:2,
7,10
resolutions
12:12
93:14
99:1
respond
92:3
94:18,20
response
9:7 81:5
91:10,22
responsibil
ity
33:7,8
responsible
33:5,10
99:22
100:2
rest
90:12,13
restate
11:10
14:21
22:10
28:8
40:19
43:17
44:1
60:15
97:2 99:9
restroom
46:13
69:22
results
48:21
retaining
20:2,5
review
8:19
ride-share
83:14,18,
24 84:10,
14,15,20,
24 85:6,
10,18,22
86:8,10,
13,18
right-hand
63:18
64:14
risk
46:24
47:10
Rodriguez
69:10,11,
15,20
role
94:16
rule
41:23,24
rules
5:18,20
9:18
safe
4:8
safety
15:8
42:19,20
SAITH
100:24
sat
78:23
scatter
78:9
schedule
10:2
scheduled
12:10
38:1
40:11
Scholars
57:18,19
58:7,11,
12
school
7:10,13,
17
screen
15:7
screening
43:13,20
44:3,18
45:8
seat
32:18,22
33:5,11,
16 34:5,
11,22
35:2,9,
14,24
36:5,11,
24 37:6,
12 41:8,
13,16,22
42:4,9
43:4,8,
13,21
44:4,20
45:3
46:24
47:21
49:1
50:11,14,
19,21
51:1,4,18
52:8,13
54:14
55:11,12,
16 60:11,
20 61:2,
6,8 69:14
70:5,9
71:13
80:6
88:15
89:24
92:6
seated
58:13
64:18
67:6,7,13
seating
10:4,6,10
22:6
23:14
24:6,11,
13,20
27:1
28:2,3,5,
9,12,14,
19,21
29:2,5,7,
12 32:1,6
33:13
34:16
36:20
39:17
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 124 of 127
41:15,20
52:17
56:2,6,12
57:21
58:18,22
59:7,11
60:18
61:4,9,12
71:6,14,
17 73:21
78:15,18
79:13
83:8
87:20
91:6
96:13,15,
23 97:17
seats
12:2
26:9,14,
15 27:4,
7,10,11,
13,14,17,
20,24
28:12
29:1,4
32:9,10,
12 37:19
39:6
40:8,18
41:2
42:11
44:11
47:4,5
48:13,19
49:9 50:6
53:20,23
54:2,7,
11,24
55:2,7
56:9,14,
18 57:10,
12 59:18
60:2,3,6,
19 61:13,
15,21
62:11
66:11,15,
17 67:1
68:11,12,
16,19
69:11,19,
20 72:19,
24 73:6,
14 74:9,
22 75:3,
16,20,24
76:9
77:9,13,
16,20,22
78:6,7,
12,13,14,
21,23
80:2,6,
10,20
81:2,7
82:14
83:11
85:17
88:20
89:1,6,
15,18
90:1,7,8,
10,14
91:7,15
92:1
94:16
95:22,24
96:1,11,
24 97:12,
13,15,20
99:23
100:9,18
16:3
43:4,10,
14,21
44:3,18,
22 45:4,
8,22
46:11,24
47:10
72:14,18
99:22
sees
100:9
sentence
40:3
separate
20:18
sergeantat-arms
4:21 5:3,
14,23
6:12,24
7:14 9:17
12:9
30:20
31:5
36:10
37:11
38:24
43:8
46:7,10
50:18,24
sergeantat-arms'
5:19
sections
78:11
set
12:10
32:10,13
37:19
70:22
88:19
89:1
security
15:22
shared
33:8
section
40:2,6
50:17
67:10
sheet
67:12
shot
51:3 98:9
show
48:11
92:14
97:24
sic
28:3
sign
100:23
signed
29:13
30:3
signs
98:15
16:19
17:4
20:13
24:22
32:23
38:10
43:15
55:4
60:13
61:22
65:17,23
73:15,22
74:1
76:11
80:21
84:4 87:3
96:3 99:7
100:23
sole
33:7
89:24
similar
56:22
someplace
21:3
sir
12:24
sort
28:10
35:5
36:14
71:22
72:22
78:12
sit
53:4
55:13
60:6
sitting
89:21
situate
92:18
size
50:19
51:1,2,6,
10
slated
67:6
SOBOTA
11:3,6
12:17,20
14:10,14,
18 15:4
spaces
56:10
89:11
90:6
span
24:6,7
speak
49:22
70:15
72:13
speaking
54:18
special
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 125 of 127
specifics
45:7
speculate
4:12 38:6
52:5
88:10
94:13
83:1
87:17
90:24
92:22
standing
28:14,19,
21 29:2,
5,7 53:17
step
94:6,14
table
63:19
64:8
stop
95:8
tables
65:4
store
20:9,12,
20 21:2
taking
37:18
40:14
44:2
49:17
53:21
70:14
stands
61:4
Starks
6:6,7
30:21
31:2,3,11
spell
3:8
state
3:8 83:10
spent
65:15,22
stated
34:14
50:7
97:14
statement
50:17
statements
93:22,23
staffed
14:8 15:2
stating
78:10
staffers
9:20
station
15:22
16:2,3
72:13
stamped
62:20
68:1 69:6
77:3 79:6
82:10
stationed
14:2,4
16:7,15,
stored
20:7
21:23
student
7:7,12
subfolder
22:15
substance
83:20
84:14
suggesting
94:22
97:10
supervisor
6:1,2,4
support
85:13
supporters
83:14,19
84:11
85:1,5,6,
19,23
86:1,10,
13,18
swept
12:7
sworn
termed
23:6
terms
36:15
54:18
stay
99:6
speculation
60:13
61:22
staff
61:3 75:5
76:5 88:8
91:6
3:2,5
9:10
standard
36:12,14
start
17:18
18:9
43:23
64:11,19
99:3
spoken
74:8
18 17:7,
18,21
18:11
19:7,10
testified
3:5 9:14
testifying
3:15
testimony
11:17
Thayer
92:22
98:2
thereof
85:14
talk
9:13
28:17,18
33:17
52:24
thing
12:18
32:16
73:8
92:17
talked
74:3
things
10:17
12:12
talking
9:6 16:12
28:5
37:16
39:1
49:15
thought
88:11
threat
45:12,15
46:1,4,12
taxicab
84:16
threw
90:12
Technically
7:11
time
5:11 6:19
7:1,2
17:21
20:3
23:15,21
29:19,24
33:16,17
34:19,20
36:9,18
temp
88:9
tenure
37:4
term
28:4 89:4
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 126 of 127
times
57:21
65:8
timestamped
87:24
title
4:20
titled
29:12
56:2
today
3:23 7:20
8:6 81:20
told
78:5
80:12
89:11,14
97:12
ton
18:21
top
63:19
83:10
TOPIC
3:7 11:4,
12 12:18,
22 14:12,
16,19
15:10
16:20
17:6
20:15
24:23
29:17
33:1
38:13
43:18
46:18
55:5,23
59:5
60:16
62:9,18
65:19
66:3
67:23
69:4
70:2,3
73:18,23
74:7
76:16
77:1 79:4
80:22
82:8,23
84:8
87:6,15
90:22
92:8,12
93:1
95:11,17
96:6 97:6
98:4
99:10
100:21
topmost
64:13
66:12,19
total
27:4,7,13
29:1
54:19,20,
21 80:9
88:19
track
67:11
train
46:10
trained
37:2
training
45:22
Trevino
91:22
true
49:18
51:24
turn
87:23
turned
55:10,15
two-week
39:20
typically
17:20
18:8,11,
15,18
20:4,7
28:11
51:2 53:5
63:13
71:5,8,11
78:8
84:15
91:24
92:2,4,5
99:19
U
Uber
84:16
85:11,12
Uh-huh
33:20
50:22
upfront
11:14
unable
80:13
Urbina
74:16
understand
3:15,18
4:5,15
11:6,8,15
13:2,7
14:17,20
21:20
22:24
23:11
28:10
31:18
33:2
44:21
53:3
63:17,24
64:10
89:7
Urbinamccarthy
75:4
V
vacant
100:9
vague
11:7
version
30:6
versus
34:1
undertaken
45:7
video
92:23
93:3,6,8,
15,17,19,
22,24
94:19
95:1,7,
10,16,19
96:14,21
97:5,10,
14,23
98:3,6,8
University
83:7
videos
92:13
unofficial
44:7,9
view
60:4
unreserved
56:12
Villegas
68:11
update
71:17,19,
20
violent
46:4,23
47:9
49:11
understandi
ng
41:15
57:16
88:18
89:5
understood
4:9 80:7
updated
71:22
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
website
40:16
visitors
50:19
51:1
Wednesday
91:11
voice
85:13
volunteer
7:3,4
volunteered
7:1
W
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 127 of 127
wait
58:9
waiting
11:1 12:1
17:16
26:5
51:6,11,
17,21
52:7,12,
15 53:13
58:6
61:19
62:12
72:9,20
73:6
74:23
75:9
78:19
95:13
weeks
30:2
37:24
40:11
whomever
44:11
99:22
Y
year
7:10,12
years
4:23 5:12
Yesterday
8:10
wishing
40:7
withdraw
81:16
word
12:23
work
4:17,18
5:9,16
6:20
10:2,5,9
12:13
20:17
47:20
worked
5:5 11:18
22:18
working
13:12
60:18
wanted
15:14
written
36:19
38:11
Ward
88:9
wrong
11:5
watched
98:6
wrote
57:17
wearing
98:15
800.211.DEPO (3376)
EsquireSolutions.com
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
CALENDAR: 07
PAGE 1 of 1
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
Exhibit G
C000437
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
CALENDAR: 07
PAGE 1 of 1
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
Exhibit H
C000438
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
CALENDAR: 07
PAGE 1 of 1
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
Exhibit I
C000488
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
CALENDAR: 07
PAGE 1 of 2
CIRCUIT COURT OF
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
CHANCERY DIVISION
CLERK DOROTHY BROWN
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)SS.
COUNTY OF COOK )
I, SUSANA A. MENDOZA,City Clerk of the City of Chicago, in the County of Cook and
State ofIllinois, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the annexed and foregoing is a true and correct copy
of that resolution now on file in my office regarding Amendment of City Council Rules of Order
and Procedure by adding new Rule 58 to allow public participation at any committee meetingopen
to public under Open Meetin sg Act, which resolution was adopted by the City of Chicago at its
regular meeting held on the fifth (Sth~v of October, 2016.
I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the original, of which the foregoing is a true and correct
copy, is entrusted to my care for safekeeping, and that I am the lawful keeper of the same.
_____~v~~~.-- ..
SUSANA A. MENDOZA,City Jerk
Exhibit J
C000489
SUBSTITUTE
RESOLUTION
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
10/11/2016 12:29 PM
2016-CH-09212
PAGE 2 of 2
(1) be physically present inside the assembly room where the committee's meeting
takes place and submit a request to testify;
(2) limit his or her remarks to three minutes;
(3) limit his or her remarks to the subject matter appearing on the agenda of the
meeting;
(4) refrain from profane language, obscene conduct,, or disruptive comments; and
(5) comply with the order of the Chairman of the committee meeting.
The committee Chairman has authority and discretion to: (i) curtail or limit public
comment if the witness fails to comply with this Rule, and (ii) allow reasonable variances from
the three-minute time limit in appropriate, non-discriminatory, circumstances.
.-`;
r~ ,h~
dward M. urke
Alderman, 14th Ward
Q~~
Michelle A. Harris
Alderman, 8th Ward
C000490
Chancery DIVISION
Litigant List
Printed on 10/11/2016
Case Number: 2016-CH-09212
Page 1 of 1
Plaintiffs
Plaintiffs Name
Plaintiffs Address
State Zip
Unit #
THAYER ANDREW
0000
GARCIA RICK
0000
Total Plaintiffs: 2
Defendants
Defendant Name
CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL
Defendant Address
State
Unit #
Service By
0000
Total Defendants: 1