Preprints of the 19th world congress

The International federation of cosmology physics

September 20-24,201

The reverese of universe into the singularity

point known as the point of starting of the
universe
Mahdi Salehi
Tehran, Iran
Email:mahdi.salehi@srbiau.ac.ir*

Abstract- for years all around the world scientists and people think the universe
ultimately expands and the whole universe need to be expanded as result of the first
expansion of singularity point known as big bang point. But here is the paper which is
going to proove the whole universe needs just to be reverted into the first point that it is
had been created from. So for the first time it is going to show that the every single particle
in space now or at a specific time is going to show the universe return into the singularity
point. Since there are mathematical reason for any theory in physics and engineering, so
it is necessary to show it by simple and basic physical and mathematical relations. So as
to define the theory and the relations, the first step should focus on the previous research
of this idea. Then start to figure this out how it is going to work with simple principles.
Introduction
At the first point of view, lets reconsider some article and papers which tell us, the universe is
not expanding like we thought. According to the big bang theory further galaxies in the universe
should be fainter but bigger. However research [1] shows that it is not. Let reveal it in other
words. As the universe is expanding, the matter which has light in longer distances needs to be
bigger with lower brightness because the space-time is strenghtened, but the comparison from
many galaxies near and far show that it is not, and they have same brightness but the galaxies
farther away have smaller surface. So why is that so? The first reason is that the universe is
divergent from our point of view at the earth, not convergent. But from other point of view, out
of the earth the universe is divergent. Since the big bang theory proove it. But there is another
view, which shows the universe is vacuming. Something like this proove the controversy
between this two theory and reality. Moreover, hubble theory of expansion also proove this
theory of retraction which accept redshift and violet shift of galaxies [2]. On the other hands,
there are plenty of theories about future and past of the universe and big bang theory
respectively. Inflation theory which represent a logical view about past and future of the
universe [3]. In addition the string theory, which define how interaction of every dimantion
could be a first point of creation [3,4,5,6,7,]. All of the thoeries have their great humanic
talent and creativity. But the truth always prefers to e owned by the more reality because reality
is observable and acheiveable for most. Furthermore, simpler science shows the beauty of
knowledge and science itself. The complxity of the universe is not because of complexity of
physical relations. It comes from engineering law which tells how simple structure toghether
can resemble a complexity.

Preprints of the 19th world congress

The International federation of cosmology physics
September 20-24,201

1. proof of retraction theory

There are not that much focus on the retraction idea, because our history of physics have been
accepted and nobody challege himself by changing the result not the theory itself. There would
not be changes in the basis of the theory and science beyond. But the conclusion can be change
which shows another great proof for the old theory. According to redshift and violet shift as a
result of frequency of light, we have believed that the universe is expanding and the galaxies
are making distances between themselves. Also in 2001 [] it has been shown the universe is
accelarate and even velocity of them has velocity.Moreover, it has been proof that the whole
universe at first was started at singularity point termed big bang. Which was right like a star
which, created a black whole at the centre of the universe[]. They are all kept a side and the
retraction of universe would be added to them. It would be a claim which tells there are two
theories about absorbtion of the universe from a side causes the galaxies at near point to have
accelaration and increasing velocity. In other words, the galaxies which, are near to retraction
point have more accelaration and those are near to us, which have same speed and same
accelaration. Also those that are far away should have lower accelaration. It is like a pulling
rope which causes near molucols have more accelaration and subsequently more velocity, and
further ones have lower accelaration and velocity. On the other hands, as it has been prooved
by other references that we are on the first ride of the world. It means, as every black hole
procedure has erobtion and absorbtion steps and more important, duration, it is necessary to
mention at the first step all matter and energy would expand at a blink of eye, then by creation
of a black hole, all of them retreite again to the hole as gravitational force like a sink. The time
and duration of expanding is comparative. It means it has time response like something in the
theory of systems in control science. So for bigger stars and bigger supernovas the erobtion
and retraction is different from those, which are smaller. The time response is not just for
prooving this thoery. Every single particle and even galaxies have the definition beyond. For
example as the black hole of Milky way galaxy has great gravitional field, so very near dust,
gas and even matter from planets or stars have the same angular speed same as the black hole
rotates and as, we take distances from the center, we see how the arms of the galaxy is spiral.
It comes from the time difference between gravitational force creation and the duration that
takes till it is transferred from the center of black hole. So by this definition, there should be a
time duration from the universe creation and its absorbtion by the densest black hole at the
center of the universe. Another important example is the way of gathering atoms, matters and
even galaxies. When atoms make matter by molucols, matters make planets and stars and the
combination of them make a galaxy, which it can combine with another galaxy. It shows that,
how matter gets bigger, the duration of combination will be longer, as it is obvious.
There always have patterns in the universe which they helps us to understand and analyse it.
For example there is similarities between atoms and solar system (and also differences). Also
for retraction theory there is one. The death of a star which creates a black hole and as it gets
massive, the matter and energy which was gone from collapse of the star will be absorbed by
the star itself. So only thing that we need to proove is that, firstly the universe was more dense
than the star, before it started, which it means just before the big bang. Secondly, the universe
bahaves like a star from the beginning till the end.
For the first one, the erobtion prooves everything. As the first step of our world was by energy
itself without matters and atoms. So the star collapse was tremendously powerful to erobts just
energy no other things like matter and atom. moreover, the time before big bang would not be

Preprints of the 19th world congress

The International federation of cosmology physics
September 20-24,201

important. Because after that we just had energy, then it does not matter what was before big
bang but the resedues will give the answer to, that it was a collapse of something like star as a
pattern.
For the second one, if we just resembled the universe as the resedues of a death of a star,
galaxies would be the elements of the star remains. This pattern helps us to figure out how
bigger stars have heavier and much more dangerous remains, so by turning to a black hole after
death, the chance of smashing other planets and stars will be lowered. For the rest some simple
relations will be shown.
There are 3 pressure states, when a star is dying. Gravitional pressure, degeneracy pressure,
thermal pressure. If gravitional pressure would be much more than the others, the probabilty
of black hole emergance will increase.

Pgravitational

Pdege neracy Pthermal

So simply the steps of electron degeneracy and neutron degeneracy will be passed and the
condition of emerge of black hole would be provided. As the mass of the whole universe is
much more than the mass of a massive star which tents to be a dense black hole, by collapse of
star like universe, the chance of turning to black hole is much more too. So the energy which
was rediated and have been becoming to planets and stars, will be absorbed by the huge,
massive and tremendously dense black hole exactly at the centre of universe,where the world
was started.
2.conclusion
Maybe no one accept physics of the theory without formula. It is a claims which will be proved
or rejected. The only thing about it, is the simplicity and logic behind.
The results and vision about the universe will change, because for about a century all around
world scientist have been thinking the universe is expanding, but the claim which has the logic
and same pattern of the universe will change their mind and let us to work on other aspects of
the universe. The thought behind the paper was to show before big bang is not that much
important bacause the comprehension of, demands the other physical dimantions. There was
not time, so other dimantion just maybe was ruled there. Anyway, minds will change when see
the world has an end like the start. Not science fictional, but also as a reality for our definite
future.