J & K political equation:Respect Mandante / Nationality??

They all are crying, shouting and bashing. I am not startled but I am amused by the split
personality on which we Indians usually drive. Our flag waving in favor or against is largely
determined by the wind which favors our boat sailing, we dont hesitate even changing the
boats too often. Flashback, some months ago Delhi favored AAP and voted them to
power.The same party is of the view that the strategic course of action related to security
deployment etc in Kashmir should be exercised in the best interest of people,and as far as
possible,with their consent. Do they really want to know the aspiration of the people
of valley??Remember,people while voting ignored the political national vision of AAP and
voted in their favor.
In democracy, electoral process acts as a Gentle Reminder to remind us of our largest
democratic nation, India and also of our individual rights.We use our right to vote judiciously
to meet our self individualistic goal.Elected representative is supposed to meet the
aspirations and expectations of the people for which he has been voted to power.
In just shifting from heart to head; from Delhi to Kashmir our theories our logic takes a
smooth U turn. Elected government is doing nothing more than appeasing the people of
valley but their political decisions are in alignment with the intentions with which people
have voted them to power. It also is in accord with the law of land and we should respect
the law of land and the mandate too ;)
It would be apt to call the poll verdict of 2015 a true reflection of wide ideological, political
and religious abyss between the Kashmir and Jammu. We all have been witness to thanks
giving ceremony to Pakistan and extremists for allowing a peaceful election in Valley. This
flash news made many to check if Pakistan have been outsourced to maintain security
check in Valley but for the rest it has assured that Pakistan breaks the peaceful atmosphere
in Valley and why this time they remained quiet. Have they changed?? Question may linger
only for viewers, electoral participants already knew the answer.
Any act of boycott would have raised the possibility and probability of BJP win in valley and
to fail the purpose, extremists and Pakistan showed faith in Indian electoral processJ.Split
verdict tried to bridge the gap between PDP and BJP as this paved the way to new alliance,
alliance to respect the mandate of people ;). In this new bonding, BJP is bound to remain
bonded with alliance o/w a re-election in state can turn the majority mandate in favor of PDP
and in that case people who are trying to counter me based on logic that PDP dont have all
the majority in the state would be void of even with that argument.
Of the total 87 seats, Jammu has 37 in its basket, valley has 46 and rest is with Ladakh and
reelection has every possibility that PDP can improve its seat tally and the current flash
news which is making many of us to shake and shiver can continue its effect. Reelection
would be wasting of public money without any expected national gains. Valley has a
potential of electing a party to power which can become the mandate of whole state. Lions
share rest with valley.

Intentions of both parties are in open now, it is destining towards who can drown whom than
to sailing together. Next political progress would not only require a wise and responsible
political will but also a clever move. Keep checking the progress..