Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s11104-012-1484-0
REGULAR ARTICLE
Received: 7 June 2012 / Accepted: 1 October 2012 / Published online: 14 October 2012
# Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012
Abstract
Background and Aims In spite of the broad array of
studies conducted on the ecology of bracken fern
(Pteridium aquilinum (L.) kuhn), there is currently
only a limited understanding of how P. aquilinum
alters the soil environment in which it succeeds. P.
aquilinum is one of the worlds most aggressive invasive species and is known to effectively invade conservation priority habitats such as Calluna vulgaris
(L.) heathland. The aim of this study was to evaluate
differences in soil properties between intact stands of
C. vulgaris and neighboring P. aquilinum to assess
Responsible Editor: Stefano Manzoni.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this
article (doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1484-0) contains
supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
T. H. DeLuca (*)
School of Environmental and Forest Sciences,
University of Washington,
107 Anderson Hall,
Seattle, WA 98195-2100, USA
e-mail: deluca@uw.edu
T. H. DeLuca : S. A. Zewdie : J. R. Healey : D. L. Jones
School of the Environment,
Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University,
Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
T. H. DeLuca : O. Zackrisson
Institute for Subarctic Landscape Research,
Silvermuseet,
Arjeplog S930 90, Sweden
Introduction
The influence of invasive and ruderal plant species on
nitrogen (N) availability is known to influence competitive
522
523
Site
Abergwyn
Moel y Ci
Holyhead
Capelulo
Penmaenmawr
Plant Grid
Elevation (m)
Aspect
Slope (%)
C. vulgaris
SH65514
460
Northwest
3045
P. aquilinum
SH65698
417
Northwest
3045
C. vulgaris
SH58774
316
Northwest
3045
P. aquilinum
SH58733
274
Northwest
1530
915
C. vulgaris
SH 21120
120
Southwest
P. aquilinum
SH21181
107
Southwest
915
C. vulgaris
SH74967
470
Southwest
1530
P. aquilinum
SH74938
455
Southwest
1530
C. vulgaris
SH73388
450
west
3545
P. aquilinum
SH73408
427
west
3545
524
transformations, we performed in-vivo net nitrification and mineralization using a 28-d aerobic
incubation assay. In brief, a soil sub-sample was
immediately extracted with 1.0 M KCl and analyzed by the microplate-colorimetric technique using the salicylate-nitroprusside method for NH4+
(Mulvaney 1996) and the vanadium method for
NO3- (Miranda et al. 2001). A second soil sample
was incubated at 25 C for 28 d; followed by
extraction and analyses of NH4+ and NO3- as described
above. Net nitrification was then calculated as NO3- at
day 28 minus NO3- at time zero; net ammonification
was calculated as NH4+ at 28 d minus NH4+ at time zero,
and net mineralization was calculated as total inorganic
N (NH4+ plus NO3-) at time 28 d minus total inorganic N
at time zero. Potentially mineralizable N was determined by placing field-moist soil (5 g) and distilled
water (12.5 ml) into 50 cm3 polypropylene tubes. The
tubes headspace was then flushed with N2(g), the tubes
sealed and incubated at 30 C for 14 d (Hart et al. 1994).
A 12.5 ml aliquot of 2 M KCl was then added to each
tube (to create 25 ml of 1 M KCl) and the soils shaken
(30 min, 200 rev min1), centrifuged (18,000 g, 5 min)
and NH4+ determined as described above. Total potentially mineralizable N (PMN) was determined as the
difference between the extractable NH4+ concentration
at 0 d and 14 d. Total dissolved N (TDN) and total
dissolved carbon (TDC) in K2SO4 extracts of soil samples were analyzed using a Shimadzu TCV-TNM1 analyzer (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). The K2SO4
extracts were 10-fold diluted with deionized water prior
to analyses. Dissolved organic N (DON) was calculated
as TDN (NH4+ + NO3-).
Denitrification enzyme activity (DEA) was determined using a modified version of the method described by Tiedje (1994). Briefly, 5 g of soil was
weighed into 50 cm 3 polypropylene tubes, and
1.25 ml of distilled water was added along with 5 ml
of KH2PO4 buffer. The tubes were capped with a
septum, and flushed with N2(g). Using a syringe,
10 % of the headspace was removed and replaced with
acetylene and the tubes gently shaken for 4 h. Using a
jumper needle, the headspace was transferred to an
evacuated vial and analyzed for total N2O on a Varian
450 gas chromatograph (Santa Clara California, USA)
equipped with an electron capture detector. Dissolved
N2O was accounted for using Bunson adsorption coefficients (Tiedje 1994) and the values reported as mg
N2O kg soil1 d1.
525
Results
Soil C and N pool sizes
Total C concentration in surface mineral soils of the
two vegetation types was significantly greater under
C. vulgaris than under P. aquilinum when averaged
across the five sites (P<0.01, Table 2); however, this
trend varied among sites. This general trend was surprising given the greater depth of O horizon associated
with P. aquilinum compared to that associated with C.
vulgaris (mean 7.9 cm and 5.4 cm respectively, P<
0.01, Table 2). There was no significant difference in
526
shown, within each site for the 12 individual plot values (9 for
Penmaenmawr and Capelulo) per stand type, and across the
sites for the 5 individual site values per stand type; *, P<0.05;
**, P<0.01
Site
Plant
Total C (gkg1)
Total N (gkg1)
C:N
Abergwyngregyn
C. vulgaris
168 (39.7)
6.4 (1.4)
26 (0.7)
Abergwyngregyn
P. aquilinum
109** (4.1)
8.0* (0.3)
14** (0.2)
Moel-y-Ci
C. vulgaris
177 (7.4)
8.0 (0.2)
22 (0.4)
Moel-y-Ci
P. aquilinum
162 (10.1)
9.5* (0.6)
17* (0.2)
Holyhead
C. vulgaris
312 (2.4)
12.5 (0.4)
25 (0.7)
Holyhead
P. aquilinum
191** (34.8)
10.6 (2.6)
19* (2.1)
Penmaenmawr
C. vulgaris
134 (12.8)
6.0 (0.7)
23 (0.5)
Penmaenmawr
P. aquilinum
168* (13.1)
7.9 (0.4)
21* (0.4)
Capelulo
C. vulgaris
306 (48.5)
10.9 (1.7)
28 (1.1)
Capelulo
P. aquilinum
123** (9.4)
6.5** (0.4)
19** (1.2)
Mean
C. vulgaris
219 (41.1)
8.7 (1.4)
25 (1.2)
Mean
P. aquilinum
151** (19.8)
8.5 (1.2)
18** (1.4)
aquilinum and C. vulgaris stands are shown, within each site for
the 12 individual plot values (9 for Penmaenmawr and Capelulo) per stand type, and across the sites for the 5 individual site
values per stand type; *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01
Site
Plant
Depth of O horizon
(cm)
Density O horizon
(gcm-3)
Abergwyn
C. vulgaris
4.33 (0.24)
0.16 (0.01)
1.22 (0.03)
Abergwyn
P. aquilinum
3.50 (0.31)
0.20 (0.01) **
1.36 (0.02) *
Moel y Ci
C. vulgaris
2.00 (0.00)
0.30 (0.02)
1.20 (0.02)
Moel y Ci
P. aquilinum
5.50 (0.50) **
0.18 (0.02) **
1.17 (0.03)
Holyhead
C. vulgaris
11.50 (0.87)
0.19 (0.02)
1.19 (0.04)
Holyhead
P. aquilinum
16.75 (2.14) **
0.16 (0.00) *
1.27 (0.03) **
Capelulo
C. vulgaris
4.89 (0.57)
0.20 (0.01)
1.32 (0.05)
Capelulo
P. aquilinum
8.67 (0.86) **
0.18 (0.00)
1.34 (0.01)
Penmaenmawr
C. vulgaris
5.22 (1.05)
0.22 (0.01)
1.33 (0.02)
Penmaenmawr
P. aquilinum
6.11 (0.59)
0.19 (0.01) *
1.33 (0.02)
Mean
C. vulgaris
5.41 (1.47)
0.21 (0.02)
1.25 (0.03)
Mean
P. aquilinum
7.87 (2.01) **
0.18 (0.01) *
1.29 (0.04)
527
Nitrogen mineralization
NO3--N
Site/Plant
NH4+-N
Amino acid- N
PMN
pH
(mgkg1)
Abergwyngregyn
C. vulgaris
1.25 (0.41)
0.73 (1.38)
1.79 (0.27)
9.55 (1.62)
3.86 (0.08)
P. aquilinum
7.38** (3.27)
6.67** (2.44)
6.99** (1.39)
17.43**(3.95)
4.42** (0.03)
C. vulgaris
1.33 (0.36)
1.67 (0.95)
3.49 (0.57)
13.18 (0.78)
4.16 (0.02)
P. aquilinum
8.90** (1.94)
12.32**(3.35)
6.12** (0.96)
6.78** (3.09)
3.96* (0.02)
C. vulgaris
2.13 (1.38)
10.41 (9.52)
2.42 (1.13)
22.36 (6.43)
4.30 (0.02)
P. aquilinum
3.45 (1.79)
10.39 (5.91)
6.41* (2.31)
15.20 (3.90)
4.09* (0.04)
C. vulgaris
0.41 (0.60)
0.00 (0.00)
2.28 (1.17)
16.91 (16.27)
3.95 (0.08)
P. aquilinum
2.18 (4.17)
5.80** (4.29)
5.25* (1.11)
24.26 (28.56)
4.03 (0.03)
Moel-y-Ci
Holyhead
Capelulo
Penmaenmawr
C. vulgaris
0.65 (0.64)
18.43 (16.06)
7.67 (5.42)
22.62 (19.08)
3.88 (0.06)
P. aquilinum
4.64** (0.86)
20.15 (13.48)
4.38 (3.39)
43.33 (31.80)
4.20** (0.04)
Mean
C. vulgaris
1.16 (0.97)
6.25 (3.13)
3.53 (0.94)
16.92 (3.76)
4.03 (0.11)
P. aquilinum
5.31* (4.30)
11.07* (1.98)
5.83* (0.45)
21.40 (6.52)
4.14* (0.09)
528
Resin NO3--N
F
Resin NH4+-N
P
Net Nitrification
P
DEA
P
Plant
44.33
0.00
13.95
0.00
140.30
0.00
5.12
0.03
Site
2.80
0.03
28.94
0.00
23.78
0.00
6.86
0.00
SitePlant
3.77
0.01
6.96
0.00
24.00
0.00
8.19
0.00
Variable
Foliage phenols
F
Foliage C
P
Foliage N
Foliage C:N
Plant
15.24
0.00
85.27
0.00
3.31
0.08
2.38
0.13
Site
2.30
0.08
3.80
0.01
2.43
0.07
2.79
0.04
SitePlant
2.87
0.04
2.39
0.07
1.91
0.13
4.41
0.01
than NH4+ sorption to resins (320 versus 120 g capsule-1). Net nitrification as measured by 28-d aerobic
incubation was significantly higher under P. aquilinum
than C. vulgaris both across all five sites and within
each of the sites (all P<0.01, Fig. 2). Nitrifier activity
based on an aerated slurry method was low in all soils
and did not vary significantly between the two vegetation types across all five sites (0.0013, 0.0068
mean +/ 0.01, 0.007 SE for P. aquilinum and C. vulgaris respectively), and was only significantly (P<0.05)
different [P. aquilinum (0.12 mean +/ 0.009SE)>C.
vulgaris (0.0019 mean +/0.0022SE)] within one site,
Moel y Ci.
Surprisingly, DEA was significantly higher (P<
0.05, Table 5) under C. vulgaris (69 g N2O g-1 mean
+/ 47 SE) than under P. Aquilinum (26 g N2O g1
mean +/14 SE) despite the large differences in extractable soil NO 3- between the vegetation types
(Table 4).
Discussion
Senescent C. vulgaris foliage was found to have significantly higher total C concentration than P. aquilinum (52 and 48 % C respectively, P<0.001), but there
were no significant differences in foliage N concentration or C:N ratio (Table 5). P. aquilinum tissue
displayed significantly greater protein complexation
capacity than C. vulgaris across all five sites (P<
0.001, Fig. 3). Total soluble phenol concentration in
senescent leaf tissue was to be significantly greater (P
<0.05) in senescent P. aquilinum than C. vulgaris
foliage (Fig. 3 and Table 4).
Arginine mineralization
529
1000
P. aquilinum
C. vulgaris
800
600
400
**
**
200
**
**
**
er
Ab
Ho
ead
lyh
Ci
wr
ulo
ma
pal
el y
Ca
aen
Mo
nm
Pe
Me
an
Site
1000
P. aquilinum
C. vulgaris
800
600
400
**
200
**
**
er
Ab
d
hea
oly
i
yC
wr
ulo
ma
pal
el
Ca
aen
Mo
m
n
Pe
an
Me
Site
60
50
P. aquilinum
C. vulgaris
40
30
20
**
**
**
10
**
**
**
0
er
Ab
y
el
Mo
Ci
r
d
aw
ea
lyh
nm
ae
Ho
m
n
Pe
lulo
pe
Ca
an
Me
Sites
Fig. 2 Net nitrification as measured using a 28-d aerobic incubation of soils collected under paired stands of P. aquilinum and
C. vulgaris at five locations in North Wales. Bars represent
meansSEM (n09 for individual sites and n05 for average
across the five sites). Significance indicated by **0P<0.01,
*0P<0.05
530
3000
-1
P. aquilinum
C. vulgaris
2500
2000
**
**
**
**
1500
**
**
1000
500
Ab
er
el y
Mo
Ci
Ho
wr
ulo
ead
ma
pal
lyh
Ca
aen
m
n
Pe
Me
an
Site
P. aquilinum
C. vulgaris
40
50
30
**
**
20
er
Ab
el y
Mo
Ci
wr
ead
ma
lyh
aen
Ho
nm
e
P
lo
palu
Ca
an
Me
Sites
70
P. aquilinum
C. vulgaris
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
12
14
16
Time (days)
b
Concentration of NH4+-N or NO3- -N (g g-1)
14
14
10
140
120
P. aquilinum
C. vulgaris
100
80
60
40
20
**
0
Ammonium
Nitrate
531
14
53.7
14
47.1
C)
-1
k1 (d )
a2 (% of total
P. aquilinum
0.83
C)
2.8
0.09
2.4
42.6
0.79
57.2
P value
5.9
0.16
0.14
0.84
5.6
0.17
k2 (d-1)
0.013
0.001
0.011
0.001
0.26
CUE
0.47
0.03
0.57
0.06
0.16
r2
0.997
0.001
0.993
0.004
0.37
aquilinum (Marrs and Watt 2006) and their rapid development along the advancing front of P. aquilinum
encroachment (Whitehead and Digby 1997) may result in a virtual tilling of surface soils resulting in
increased N mineralization in soils occupied by P.
aquilinum. The depth of P. aquilinum rhizomes is
known to vary depending on type (long- versus
short-shoots, age of clonal fragment and disturbance),
but often results in rhizomatous soil disturbance to
depths of over a meter (Marrs and Watt 2006). In
contrast, heather species such as C. vulgaris produce
long-lasting suberized roots that turnover much more
slowly and are likely to have a lesser physical impact
on soil on an annual basis. Given the high total biomass associated with P. aquilinum stands in contrast to
heathland and that rhizomes have the capacity to
greatly increase N uptake in clonal species (Brooker
et al. 1999), the much higher concentrations of inorganic N found in P. aquilinum than C. vulgaris soils is
a striking result. It must be assumed that the potentially higher rate of N uptake by P. aquilinum is further
exceeded by its effect on soil N cycling, and in particular N mineralization rate, associated with soil
changes caused by the extensive horizontal and vertical growth of P. aquilinum rhizomes. It was also
notable that O horizon depth was significantly greater
and O horizon bulk density was significantly lower
under P. aquilinum compared to C. vulgaris stands
across the five sites. This is likely to be caused by a
combination of the physical impact of rhizome colonization of surface organic horizons, the rate of biomass turnover of P. aquilinum rhizomes and roots, the
quantity of frond litter produced annually by this deciduous fern, and the slow rate of decomposition of
this litter (Marrs and Watt 2006).
532
nitrification assay were much greater under P. aquilinum than under C. vulgaris. Enrichment of extractable
amino N, and to a greater extent NH4+ and to yet a
greater extent NO3- under P. aquilinum reflect greater
rates of N accumulation at all stages of N mineralization but especially net nitrification (the percent greater
N pool enrichment under P. aquilinum compared to C.
vulgaris for PMN is 26 %, for amino N is 65 %, for
NH4+ is 77 % and for NO3- is 358 %).
These results underscore the role that competitive
or invasive species may play in perturbing ecosystem
N cycling (Rout and Callaway 2009). While this phenomenon has been well documented in a number of
cases of N-fixing invasive species (e.g. Myrica faya in
Hawaii (Vitousek and Walker 1989), U. europaeus in
New Zealand (Magesan et al. 2012), Sorghum halpense in North America (Rout and Chrzanowski
2009), the present study is one of the clearest example
that we are aware of for a non-N-fixing species.
Increased N availability in a P. aquilinum stand may
reduce the potential for C. vulgaris re-establishment in
the short term, but may also result in improved fertility
conditions for the establishment of desirable or domestic species. Further, acknowledgement of the influence of P. aquilinum on soil nutrient status may
influence the way we approach P. aquilinum management. Rather than attempting to eradicate P. aquilinum, achieving the level of control sufficient for
establishment of species planted or naturally regenerating in P. aquilinum stands may enable them to utilize the
improved fertility conditions in these sites. Provided that
these species can be successful in subsequent competition with P. aquilinum, e.g. if they are woody plants that
can shade the P. aquilinum to reduce its vigor (Marrs
and Watt 2006), this may provide a cost-effective solution for site management.
Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Sanatan Das
Gupta, Kathi Ackermann, Rose Rusbridge, Emil DeLuca, Henry
DeLuca, Sarah Chesworth, Sophie Ackermann, and Prabi Basnet
for their assistance with field and laboratory work.
Conclusions
Nitrogen mineralization and nitrification are clearly
enhanced in soils associated with P. aquilinum compared with that under neighboring C. vulgaris. Levels
of net nitrification as measured by absorption to buried
ionic resins or by use of an aerobic 30-d net
References
Armstrong J, Armstrong W, Beckett PM (1992) Phragmites
australis: venturi- and humidity-induced pressure flows
enhance rhizome aeration and rhizosphere oxida. New
Phytol 120:197207
533
Httenschwiler S, Vitousek PM (2000) The role of polyphenols in
terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. TREE 15:238243
Hofland-Zijlstra JD, Berendse F (2010) Effects of litters with
different concentrations of phenolics on the competition
between Calluna vulgaris and Deschampsia flexuosa.
Plant Soil 327:131141
Jalala MAF, Read DJ, Haslam E (1982) Phenolic composition and
its seasonal variation in Calluna vulgaris. Phytochemistry
21:13971401
Jones DL, Healey JR, Willett VB, Farrar JF, Hodge A (2005)
Dissolved organic nitrogen uptake by plantsan important
N uptake pathway? Soil Biol Biochem 37:413423
Jones ME, Fenn ME, Paine TD (2011) The effect of nitrogen
additions on bracken fern and its insect herbivores at sites
with high and low atmospheric pollution. Arthropod-Plant
Inte 5:163173
Kemmitt SJ, Wright D, Goulding KWT, Jones DL (2006) pH
regulation of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in two agricultural soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38:898911
Magesan GN, Wang H, Clinton PW (2012) Nitrogen cycling in
gorse-dominated ecosystems in New Zealand. N Z J Ecol
36:2128
Marrs RH, Pakeman RJ (1995) Bracken invasion lessons from
the past and prospects for the future. In: Thompson DBA,
Hester AJ, Usher MB (eds) Heaths and moorland: cultural
landscapes. HMSO, Edinburgh, pp 180193
Marrs RH, Watt AS (2006) Biological flora of the British Isles:
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn. J Ecol 94:12721321
Marrs RH, Proctor J, Heaney A, Mountford MD (1988)
Changes in soil nitrogen-mineralization and nitrification
along an altitudinal transect in tropical rain forest in
Costa Rica. J Ecol 76:466482
Marrs RH, Lowday JE, Jarvis L, Gough MW, Rowland AP
(1992) Control of bracken and the restoration of heathland.
IV. Effects of bracken control and heathland restoration
treatments on nutrient distribution and soil chemistry. J
Appl Ecol 29:218225
Miles J (1985) The pedogenic effects of different species and
vegetation types and the implications of succession. J Soil
Sci 36:571584
Miranda KM, Espey MG, Wink DA (2001) A rapid, simple
spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of
nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide-Biol Chem 5:6271
Mitchell RJ, Marrs RH, Le Duc MG, Auld MHD (1997) A
study of successoin on lowland heaths in Dorset, southern
Englad: changes in vegetation and soil chemical properties.
J Appl Ecol 34:14261444
Mulvaney RS (1996) Nitrogen - inorganic forms. In: Sparks
DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical
methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison,
pp 11231184
Nsholm T, Persson J (2001) Plant acquisition of organic nitrogen in boreal forests. Physiol Plant 111:419426
Nielsen PL, Andresen LC, Michelsen A, Schmidt IK, Kongstad
J (2009) Seasonal variations and effects of nutrient applications on N and P and microbial biomass under two
temperate heathland plants. Appl Soil Ecol 42:279287
Oaks A (1994) Primary nitrogen assimilation in higher plants
and its regulation. Can J Bot 72:739750
Roberts J, Pymar CF, Wallace CF, Pitman RM (1980) Seasonal
changes in leaf area, stomatal and canopy conductances
534
and transpiration from bracken below a forest canopy. J
Appl Ecol 17:409422
Rout ME, Callaway RM (2009) An invasve plant paradox.
Science 324:734735
Rout ME, Chrzanowski TH (2009) The invasive Sorghum halepense harbors endophytic N2-fixing bacteria and alters soil
biogeochemistry. Plant Soil 315:163172
Schimel JP, Bennett J (2004) Nitrogen mineralization challenges
of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85:591602
Schliemann SA, Bockheim JG (2011) Methods for studying
treefall gaps: a review. For Ecol Manag 261:11431151
Simon J, Gleadow RM, Woodrow IE (2010) Allocation of
nitrogen to chemical defence and plant functional traits is
constrained by soil N. Tree Physiol 30:11111117
Smart RP, Calver LJ, Crowe AM, Emmerson KM, Cresser MS
(2007) Bracken effects on inorganic leaching from an
upland podzol. Soil Use Manag 23:317322
Sokolovski SG, Meharg AA, Maathuis FJM (2002) Calluna
vulgaris root cells show increased capacity for amino acid
uptake when colonized with the mycorrhizal fungus
Hymenoscyphus ericae. New Phytol 155:525530
Soulsby C, Reynolds B (1994) The chemistry of throughfall,
stemflow, and soil water beneath oak woodland and moorland vegetation in upland Wales. Chem Ecol 9:115134
Stams AJM, Schipholt IJL (1990) Nitrate accumulation in leaves
of vegetation of a forested ecosystem receiving high amounts
of atmospheric ammonium sulfate. Plant Soil 125:143145
Swain T, Hillis WE (1959) The phenolic constituents of Prunus
domestica. I. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J Agr Food Sci 10:6368
Tiedje JM (1994) Denitrifiers. In: Weaver RW, Angle S,
Bottomley P, Bezdicek D, Smith S, Tabatabai A, Wollum