Professional Documents
Culture Documents
201500639
Communication
9364
Communication
Table 1. Optimization of allylation of benzamide with allyl bromide.[a]
Entry[a]
[Ni]
R-CO2H
T [8C]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Ni(acac)2
Ni(OAc)2
NiCl26 H2O
Ni(OTf)2
Ni(OH)2
Ni(COD)2
Ni(COD)2
Ni(COD)2
Ni(COD)2
Ni(COD)2
Ni(COD)2
Ni(COD)2
Ni(OTf)2
m-toluic acid
m-toluic acid
m-toluic acid
m-toluic acid
m-toluic acid
m-toluic acid
Mes-CO2H
pivalic acid
m-toluic acid
m-toluic acid
m-toluic acid
PCy3
PPh3
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
3 a/4 a[b]
1.3:1
1.1:1
3:1
10:1
11:1
11:1
10:1
6:1
2:1
11:1
13:1
12:1
Yield [%][c]
n.r.[d]
53
66
68
85
89
> 99[e]
> 99[e]
> 99[e, f]
> 99[e, g]
> 99[h]
89[e]
72[e]
[a] All reactions were carried out in nitrogen atmosphere using 1 a/2/[Ni]/
acid/base in 0.2/0.6/0.02/0.04/0.4 mmol in 1 mL DMF at 140 8C (oil-bath
temperature) for 18 h. [b] Ratio was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy
from crude mixture. [c] Isolated yield of amide 3 a. [d] No reaction.
[e] Conversion instead of yield, calculated using gas chromatogram in the
presence of dodecane as an internal standard. [f] Dimethyl acetamide
used as a solvent. [g] o-Xylene used as a solvent. [h] Reaction was carried
out in 6 h.
[a] All reactions were carried out in nitrogen atmosphere using 1 a/2/
Ni(COD)2/3-methylbenzoicacid/base in 0.2/1.0/0.02/0.04/0.4 mmol in 1 mL
solvent at 140 8C (oil-bath temperature) for 22 h; [b] 20 mol % of 2,4,6-trimethyl benzoic acid used.
Next we further extended the reaction scope with other allylic substrates. Undeniably the reaction worked well when
other allylic substrates were employed, in moderate
to good yield. All reactions were regioselective and
Table 2. Optimization of allylation of benzamide with allyl bromide.
linear isomers were obtained in a mixture of stereoisomers 3 il. Addition of CH2 group in 1 i between
benzene and carbonyl group of amide did not give
any conversion reflecting the necessity of the alphasubstituent next to the carbonyl group. Homocoupling reaction is preferred over the desired allylation
when the reaction is performed with cinnamyl bromide and 1 a under the optimized reaction conditions. Changing the reaction parameters such as temperature, time or solvent did not give us the desired
results with our catalytic system.
Selective bis-allylation of CH bonds of benzamide
is difficult to perform under normal circumstances, as
it often tends to give a mixture of mono- and bis-allylated amide. Selective bis-allylated amide is of interest for acyclic diene metathesis (ADMET) polymerization. Our investigation revealed that bis-allylation
could be possible by switching solvent from DMF to
NMP (N-methylpyrrolidine) with various benzamide
and allyl bromides at 140 8C for 18 h. Bis-allylated
electron-rich aromatic amides were obtained as
major compounds in good yield (6190 %; Table 3).
Electron-poor aromatics gave complete conversion
but resulted in a mixture of mono- and bis-allylated
product.
The developed synthetic methodology for mono[a] All reactions were carried out in Nitrogen atmosphere using 1 a/2/[Ni]/3-methylbenzoic acid/base in 0.2/0.6/0.02/0.04/0.4 mmol in 1 mL solvent at 140 8C (oil-bath
allylation was tested for bulk-scale production and it
temperature) for 18 h; [b] 20 mol % of 2,4,6-trimethyl benzoic acid used. [c] In parenworked excellently with an expected allylated prodthesis ratio of 3:4.
uct in 70 % yield (Scheme 1). Several control experi-
www.chemeurj.org
9365
Communication
www.chemeurj.org
9366
Communication
[6]
Acknowledgements
[7]
[8]
[9]
www.chemeurj.org
[10]
9367
Communication
5495 5499; g) D. G. Yu, T. Gensch, F. D. Azambuja, S. V-. Cspedes, F.
Glorius, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 17722.
[11] Selected examples on carboxylate-assisted metal catalysed CH bond
functionalization, see: a) V. I. Sokolov, L. L. Troitskaya, O. A. Reutov, J. Organomet. Chem. 1979, 182, 537 546; b) A. D. Ryabov, I. K. Sakodinskaya,
A. K. Yatsimirsky, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1985, 2629 2638; c) M. Lafrance, K. Fagnou, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16496 16497; d) L. Ackermann, P. Novk, R. Vicente, N. Hofmann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 6045 6048; Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 6161 6164; e) P. Arockiam, V.
Poirier, C. Fischmeister, C. Bruneau, P. H. Dixneuf, Green Chem. 2009, 11,
1871 1875; f) F. Pozgan, P. H. Dixneuf, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351,
1737 1743; g) L. Ackermann, R. n. Vicente, H. K. Potukuchi, V. Pirovano,
Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5032 5035; h) P. B. Arockiam, C. Fischmeister, C. Bruneau, P. H. Dixneuf, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6629 6632; Angew.
www.chemeurj.org
Chem. 2010, 122, 6779 6782; i) E. Ferrer Flegeau, C. Bruneau, P. H. Dixneuf, A. Jutand, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10161 10170; j) F. W. Patureau, F. Glorius, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1977 1979; Angew.
Chem. 2011, 123, 2021 2023; k) V. S. Thirunavukkarasu, J. Hubrich, L.
Ackermann, Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4210 4213.
[12] See the Supporting Information for detailed optimization.
[13] a) G. Chaboussant, R. Basler, H.-U. Gudel, S. Ochsenbein, A. Parkin, S.
Parsons, G. Rajaraman, A. Sieber, A. A. Smith, G. A. Timco, R. E. P. Winpenny, Dalton Trans. 2004, 2758 2766; b) T. Yamamoto, J. Ishizu, A. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6863 6869.
9368