Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jonas Reuter
Physikalisches Institut der Universit
at Bonn
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
1 / 42
Overview
Kaluza Theory
Predictions
Conclusion
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
2 / 42
References
arXiv:gr-qc/9805018v1 .
T. Kaluza, Zum Unit
atsproblem der Physik, Sitz. Preuss. Akad.
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
3 / 42
Kaluza Theory
Kaluzas idea
25.11.2010
4 / 42
Kaluza Theory
Kaluzas idea
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
5 / 42
Kaluza Theory
Notation
)
hats denote 5d quantities (G
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
6 / 42
Kaluza Theory
Basic ansatz
AB
(J. Reuter)
AB R gAB
= R
2
C B
C +
C
D
C D
= C
AB
AC
AB CD AD BC
1 CD
=
g (A gDB + B gDA D gAB )
2
25.11.2010
7 / 42
Kaluza Theory
(
gAB ) =
g + 2 2 A A 2 A
2 A
2
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
8 / 42
Kaluza Theory
Resulting equations
One obtains:
G =
2 2 EM 1
T [ ( ) g ]
2
F = 3
=
(J. Reuter)
2 2
F F
4
25.11.2010
9 / 42
Kaluza Theory
F = 0
originally Kaluza and Klein set = 1
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
10 / 42
Kaluza Theory
extra dimensions
Problem: Why dont we see extra dimensions?
solutions:
1
2
3
Theory
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
11 / 42
Kaluza Theory
Predictions
Conclusion
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
12 / 42
compactification
circular topology of 5th dimension
25.11.2010
13 / 42
Action
S =
16 G
g d 4 xdy
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
14 / 42
Metric
1/3
g + 2 A A A
A
= 4 G
Z
G = G / dy
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
15 / 42
Resulting action
S = d x g
+ F F + 2
16 4
6
2
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
16 / 42
Z
S =
d x dy
g A A
expand in Fourier-modes:
(x,y ) =
n=
X
(n) (x)e in r
n=
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
17 / 42
inA
=
dy
d x g
(n)
+
r
n
inA
n2 (n)2
(n)
+
2
r
r
Z
XZ
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
18 / 42
n
qn =
r
Z
1/2
n 16G
=
dy
r
|n|
mn =
r
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
19 / 42
Special problems:
explicit addition of matter
quantized mass
predicted mass of lowest Fouriermode mpl
higher dimensions
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
20 / 42
Projective geometry
Projective geometry
Projective geometry
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
21 / 42
Projective geometry
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
22 / 42
Projective geometry
Z
S =
d x g
R
+
16G
+ Sm
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
23 / 42
Projective geometry
1
S =
16G
d 4 x g R
=0
is constrained by experiment to be greater than 500
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
24 / 42
Projective geometry
Solution attempt 1
conditions
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
25 / 42
Projective geometry
Solution attempt 2
AB = 8 G
AB
G
with energy projector AB
0 = e g
use conformally rescaled metric g
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
26 / 42
Projective geometry
EM
G = 8G (T
+ + )
H = J
2
1
= 8G ( + F H )
3
2
EM , substrate energy tensor
with electric energy-momentum tensor T
= and . . .
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
27 / 42
Projective geometry
Some tensors
3
=
16G
1
g
2
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
28 / 42
Projective geometry
Implications
fields
scalaric polarization of vacuum
dependent on scalarism parameter = (main free parameter)
experimental constraints are upper limits on
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
29 / 42
Projective geometry
Special achievements:
in principle testable predicitions
Special problems:
modifies geometric foundation
either needs substrate or can only describe microscopic phenomenons
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
30 / 42
Noncompactified theories
Noncompactified theories
Noncompactified theories
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
31 / 42
Noncompactified theories
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
32 / 42
Noncompactified theories
Metric
(
gAB ) =
(J. Reuter)
g 0
0 2
25.11.2010
33 / 42
Noncompactified theories
AB = 0 one gets:
using R
R =
( )
2
4 4 g
4 (4 g )
g 4 g 4 g
+g 4 g 4 g
2
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
34 / 42
Noncompactified theories
1
R g R = 8GT
2
results in energy-momentum tensor of induced matter:
8GT
(J. Reuter)
( )
4 4 g
=
2
4 (4 g )
g 4 g 4 g
+g 4 g 4 g
2
i
g
+
4 g 4 g + (g 4 g )2
4
25.11.2010
35 / 42
Noncompactified theories
P = 0
with
1
P =
g 4 g g 4 g
2 g44
geodesic equation
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
36 / 42
Noncompactified theories
one gets:
=
4 g 4 g
g 4 (4 g ) 4 g 4 g
+
4
2
2
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
37 / 42
Noncompactified theories
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
38 / 42
Noncompactified theories
Special Achievements:
gives Energy-momentum tensor from geometry
testable predictions
Special problems:
physical quantities dependent on 5d coordinate-system
interpretation not clear
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
39 / 42
Predictions
Overview
Kaluza Theory
Predictions
Conclusion
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
40 / 42
Predictions
Predictions
not distinguishable
for matter interpretation: slow variation of rest mass ( 1012 yr1 )
soliton solutions show deviations in classical tests, for example:
gravitational redshift
light deflection
geodetic precession Gravity Probe-B is close
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
41 / 42
Conclusion
Conclusion
have seen that general relativity and electrodynamics can be unified
(J. Reuter)
25.11.2010
42 / 42