Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evidence (Candidate)
____Inadequate
____Emerging
_X__Proficient
____Distinctive
Respond to:
How did this lesson fit into the curriculum?
How did you determine the appropriate standards and objectives?
What specific academic language would you use?
Why did you choose the materials? How effective were they?
How did you plan to engage the learners?
Copyright 2014. Alverno College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All rights reserved under U.S., International
and Universal Copyright Conventions. Reproduction in part or whole by any method is prohibited by law.
ED FORM 711
0210 ED
Evidence (Candidate)
____Emerging
__X__Proficient
____Distinctive
Respond to:
How did you create a positive learning environment?
How do you feel students felt during the lesson? What is your
evidence?
How did you demonstrate respect for, and rapport with the learners?
How did you actively engage students? Who responded? Who did
not? Why?
What kinds of responses did you give to learners responses?
ED FORM 711
0210 ED
Evidence (Candidate)
Proficient = Satisfactory
Encourages discussion.
Modifies explanations when necessary to assist students
understanding.
Recognizes the importance of verbal and nonverbal communication.
Is a thoughtful and responsive listener.
Communicates in ways that demonstrate a sensitivity to cultural and
gender differences.
Models appropriate communication strategies in conveying ideas
and information.
Distinctive = Exemplary
____Emerging
__X__Proficient
____Distinctive
Respond to:
How well did your strategies support meeting the lesson
objectives/learning targets?
What went well? What would you change? Why?
How effective were the leveled questions you used?
How did you use the academic language? How well do you think the
learners know and understand the academic language? ELL? SPE?
Cite evidence.
ED FORM 711
0210 ED
Evidence (Candidate)
____Inadequate
__X__Emerging
____Proficient
____Distinctive
Respond to:
How well did your assessment measure learners meeting the
objectives?
What were your assessment results during and/or after the lesson?
How does this inform you of next learning steps?
What would you change about your teaching and/or assessment to
better support or extend learners performance?
Evidence (Candidate)
ED FORM 711
0210 ED
____Emerging
__X__Proficient
____Inadequate
____Emerging
_X__Proficient
____Distinctive
Respond to:
Describe your contact with the CT in planning this lesson. (e.g. How far
ahead did you contact her/him? Did you suggest a lesson or use one
already in place? If in place, did you discuss or make any modifications?)
How did you present yourself as a professional to the learners?
See below.
Copyright 2014. Alverno College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All rights reserved under U.S., International
and Universal Copyright Conventions. Reproduction in part or whole by any method is prohibited by law.
ED FORM 711
0210 ED
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
background information about the lesson, (e.g. urban, 3rd grade, social studies lesson on )
how in the design or implementation of the lesson you demonstrated two of the Wisconsin Teacher Standards for Licensure and
Development; (name the standards and provide evidence of your actions)
how in the design or implementation of the lesson you demonstrated two of the Alverno Graduate Advanced Education Abilities;
how the lesson demonstrates the Common Core Standards or academic standards;
at least one educational framework that is reflected in the design and/or implementation of the lesson plan (e.g. Bloom, Vygotsky,
Gardner)
This lesson was a 6th grade Earth Science on Weather and weather tools. The students are predominately urban
Hmong students.
In designing this lesson I took into consideration standard # l (The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of
inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and can create learning experiences that make these
aspects of subject matter meaningful for students.). The lesson was planned so students were able to create their
groups anemometer independently. It gave them a chance to problem solve and experiment on their own. They also
were asked to think of a time they experienced crazy weather so they had a chance to connect to why it is important
to predict weather and how it is done. It also demonstrates standard #6(The teacher uses knowledge of effective
verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques to foster active inquiry, collaboration, and supportive
interaction in the classroom.) In engaging the students with questions and what ifs I was able to foster inquiry among
the students. I also used clearly written directions so they could work together as a group to build and experiment
with the anemometer.
I exhibited conceptualization through the planning of this lesson. I used previous knowledge of where students are
developmentally to create directions and questions for them the answer on their lab worksheet. I also used
coordination in implementing the lesson. As the students were working I rotated through the room to see if they were
following directions and were on track. My CT and I worked together before the lesson to determine what materials
were needed and coordinated getting the supplies. I also created more than anemometer earlier in the week to see
how the construction process would work which led me to change the directions. This lesson was a small part of the
NGSS standard ESS2.C. The standard has students learning about the major determinants of local weather patterns.
One of the performance expectations has the students using weather tools to measure different weather factors. This
lesson had students practice-using anemometer a tool used to measure wind speed. Students also were able to
demonstrate common core standard SL.61.c because they were led in discussion where they could discuss idea and
experiences they have had with weather.
Copyright 2014. Alverno College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All rights reserved under U.S., International
and Universal Copyright Conventions. Reproduction in part or whole by any method is prohibited by law.
ED FORM 711
0210 ED
I used Howard Gardeners theory of multiple intelligences to create this lesson. Students had a chance to use
interpersonal as they worked together as a group. They also used bodily-kinesthetic and visual-spatial as the followed
directions and built the anemometers. Finally students used logical mathematical to use the anemometers to
measure the wind speed.
Copyright 2014. Alverno College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All rights reserved under U.S., International
and Universal Copyright Conventions. Reproduction in part or whole by any method is prohibited by law.
ED FORM 711
0210 ED