ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my teacher (Name of the

teacher) as well as our principal (Name of the principal)who gave me the golden
opportunity to do this wonderful project on the topic (Write the topic name), which also
helped me in doing a lot of Research and i came to know about so many new things I am
really thankful to them.
Secondly i would also like to thank my parents and friends who helped me a lot in
finalizing this project within the limited time frame.

REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND FAMILY

Infertility is estimated to affect more than 80 million people worldwide, and while developments in
reproductive technologies have evolved rapidly, so have the ethical, social and political controversies
which surround nearly all aspects of their use
People have accepted the practice of various forms of fertility treatment for thousands of years. Despite
this, controversy surrounds these new reproductive technologies because they challenge the traditional
understanding of the relationship between sex and procreation. Consequentially, this also has the
potential to challenge the structure of linage and kinship networks.
This report will investigate the reported and perceived social implications of some commonly used
reproductive technologies currently used today; including contraception, in-vitro fertilisation, gamete
intra-fallopian transfer, intra-cytoplasmic Sperm Injection, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, gamete
donation and abortion.
EQUALITY OF ACCESS
Reproductive technologies have had a significant impact to the lives of many infertile and sub-fertile
couples around the world. However, due to the high financial costs of these procedures, the access to
these technologies is largely limited to Western society; particularly middle to high income earners.
Consequentially, developing countries whom have the highest rates of infertility, have limited access to
these technologies.

The use of these technologies is surrounded with controversy over the social implications involved. In
the case of developing countries, some fear allowing access to these societies would lead to increased
population growth in already overpopulated environments. A potential consequence of this would
include further inequality to resource access, increased risk for the spread of disease, and subsequent
extrapolation of financial costs.
However this ignites further controversy, as denying the access of these services is considered to violate
a basic human right, established in the UN Declaration of Human Rights Article 16.1: Xvi, which states
123

men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right

to marry and to found a family.

TYPES OF REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY
IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION
.The technique requires ovarian hyperstimulation in order to extract a number of developed ova from the
ovaries. These are then fertilized external to the body, and the resulting embryo is replaced in the uterus
several days later for implantation.
IVF is considered to have a notable impact on society, mainly due to its risks and social-evils. The risks
In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) is an assisted reproductive technology that has been used since the of IVF
have been well documented, and include multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and ovarian hyper
stimulation syndrome (OHSS).
The major outcome of IVF is that it has provided a means for many infertile couples/individuals to have
children. However in doing so, there are concerns regarding the fertilization of oocytes outside of the
body. Not only is this viewed as unnatural, but it also requires extensive laboratory work in order to
retrieve, fertilize and replace the resulting embryo.
Additionally, as with many assisted reproductive procedures, success entails an increased risk of having
a multiple pregnancy, which has considerable increased health risks for the mother and fetuses. This is
because more than one oocyte is often transferred into the fallopian tubes, with the potential for
fertilization. This procedure also increases the risk of an ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, premature birth
1

http://www.reproductivefacts.org/intrauterine insemination IUI FactSheet

2
3

and other complications. Therefore, it has the potential to lead to significant emotional and financial
costs for the family and wider society. It has been reported that average, hospital charges for a twin
delivery were four times higher than for a singleton, whereas charges for a triplet delivery were eleven
times higher. Additionally, there are long term costs associated with complications; including mental
retardation, cerebral palsy, chronic problems with lung development and learning disabilities, which
increase in frequency with pre-maturity.
Another controversial issue is associated with age. There is debate over what age is too old for a person
to undergo IVF in order to have a child, with reports of women utilizing its services after the onset of
Menopause. This raises concern for the mothers health in surviving the pregnancy, as well as their
ability to survive long enough to raise the child.
INTRA-CYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION
ICSI was introduced in 1992 and is considered to overcome the obstacles that IVF cannot. It allows
clinically infertile men to have children without the use of a donor.
The process involves removal of tissue from the testes; on which a biopsy is carried out and sperm is
removed. The fertilization and implantation process occurs as for IVF, however it involves the risk of
possible developmental problems in the offspring, ectopic pregnancy and OHSS
The major concern for the use of ICSI to treat male-factor infertility is the belief that these infertile men
will pass on their infertility to their offspring (particularly males), perpetuating the cycle of ART
dependency in order to reproduce. There is the belief that if a person cannot naturally reproduce, then
they are not meant to. However, you would have to consider if there actually is a gene for infertility, and
if so, what is the likelihood of such a gene being actively passed on through the use of ICSI?
GAMETE INTRAFALLOPIAN TRANSFER
GIFT is similar to that of IVF where the woman's ovaries are stimulated to produce multiple oocytes at
one time and then collected. Spermatozoa are also collected from the male partner or donor. The
difference however lies in the process of fertilization. GIFT involves transferring the collected gametes
into the womans fallopian tubes; allowing fertilization to occur as it would naturally. Consequentially,
GIFT is the only form of ART that is supported by the Catholic Church; provided the spermatozoa is
collected during intercourse.

The probability of a successful pregnancy using this method is not any better than with conventional
IVF, and is not suitable for many causes of infertility; including blocked fallopian tubes, pelvic
adhesions or server forms of male infertility. Nevertheless, this has a profound impact for infertile
couples who want children, but who are unwilling to defy their beliefs. This is particularly the case for
members of the Catholic faith, which was estimated to have a total worldwide population of 1.06 billion
in 2001.
Although this procedure is reported to only have a 20% success rate, and is consequently responsible for
substantial disappointment for many couples; its positive outcomes are argued to outweigh this issue.

According to Wikipedia (2005), the inability to conceive often bears a stigma in many cultures around
the world. Additionally, the anxiety and disappointment of having this knowledge often leads to marital
discord. Therefore, this technology is believed to provide these couples with hope; which is argued to
improve marital stability, resulting in a number of favourable social implications.
However, there is argument that this technology will provide an incentive for couples in western
societies to prolong age of first conception, which is already an observed trend. This has the potential to
slow population growth, and possibly hinder the populations progress and productivity in the future.
However, the success of this procedure becomes significantly less effective with increasing age of the
female. Providing this information becomes public knowledge, it is unlikely to cause a significant effect
on wider society.
This procedure also involves an increased risk multiple pregnancy and complications; including ectopic
pregnancy, miscarriage and premature birth. As mentioned previously, this can entail significant
individual and social implications.
DONARS
The donation of gametes and embryos to infertile couples has proved to have significant success rates in
obtaining a successful pregnancy. However, there are a number of concerns associated with its use.
By tradition, parents create children. However, this technology has challenged this belief by redefining
the concept; that it is children who create parents.(Edwards et al 1993) As a result, the use of donors
challenges many social concepts associated with kinship and lineage.
Some religions, such as the Catholic faith, consider the donation of gametes to constitute the
interference of a third party in the holiness of marriage. Therefore, a couple confronted with the
4

possibility of a sperm or oocyte donation must overcome a symbolic barrier of adultery. (Englert et al
2004) Additionally, this removes a partners biological interest in the child, and has created instances of
custody debate between the genetic parent and birth parent.
This has ignited debate over the issue of anonymity. Some believe it is up to the parents who raise the
child to decide whether or not to disclose the information. However, according to Englert et al (2004),
non-anonymity is gaining grounds, mainly because (true or not), in a society that gives more and more
space to genetics, it is believed that knowing your genetic origin is an important part of knowing who
you are, and that knowing the identity of her or his donor is part of your wellbeing.5
Additionally, according to Edwards et al (1993), the use of this technology instigates the controversial
issue of virgin births, where women who do not want to have sexual relations, can have the option of
having children. This opens the ethical debate over same sex parenting.
Couples generally prefer to be a relation of the donar. This reflects the importance societies have placed
on genetic heritability. However, there are differing opinions associated with what is acceptable for each
sex gamete. Some consider oocyte donation more acceptable, as it is considered an asexual process;
therefore avoiding the perception of adultery. In addition, one study found that 86% of the women and
66% of their partners in recipient couples favored using a sister for oocyte donation, but 9% of the
women and 14% of the men expressed the same preference using a brother for sperm donation. (Englert
et al 2004) Edwards et al (1993) found similar results, they contributed it to sexual competition; where it
was considered to create a closer bond between sisters, but conflict between brothers.
Another issue is associated with selling gametes as commodities. Oocytes are reported to be most highly
paid for, largely because it requires more effort from the female donor, and incurs some potential health
risks. However, this has resulted in placing a premium on women who are in good health, and who
appear to be a good investment. As a result, this has increased the risk of donars to hide possible health
problems, which has potentially detrimental health effects for the couple, and resultant child.
There is also concern about consanguinity between offspring of recipients from the same donor.
According to Borrero, C (2003) this is a problem in small communities in which a very limited supply
of donors is available. It has been suggested that in a population of 800 000, limiting a single donor to
no more than 25 pregnancies would avoid inadvertent consanguineous conception.
5

Englert, Y et al (2004) Sperm and oocyte donation: gamete donor issues International Congress Series
vol 1266 pp. 303-310

PRE-IMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS

Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) provides the opportunity for couples at risk of having a
child with a serious genetic condition, to start a pregnancy with the knowledge their embryos will not be
affected with the indicated disease
While this is the major focus of PGD, fears are held that it will be used to make designer babies; whom
adhere to certain requirements desired by the parents (ie IQ, hair and eye colour, athletic ability, etc).
Currently, this is not possible, but debate over the societal impact of such a prospect has been
overwhelming.6
However, PGD does have the ability to determine the sex of the embryo; well before it develops into a
fetus and gender testing can be carried out via ultra-sound. This leaves open the way for people to
choose the sex of their child, and dispose of embryos that are not of the desired sex. Allowing couples to
determine the make up of their family through PGD and IVF is currently prevented in Australia through
legislation; but sex-selection on the basis of a sex-linked chromosomal disorder has been allowed.
Biased sex-selection could have considerable implications to society, through Altering population
demographics and sex ratios. There could also be consequences for the family unit, as the technology is
not 100% accurate. Parents holding high expectations of having a certain sex offspring would be
emotionally affected by having a child of the other sex, not to mention the parental investment issues the
child would subsequently face.
CONTRACEPTION
Contraception has allowed people to have control over their own fertility. Therefore, people are able to
make an attempt to avoid pregnancy at times when they do not plan to have children; or to plan and
choose the number of children they wish to have (IPPF, p17). There are many different techniques
encompassed by the term contraception.
Natural Family Planning Techniques are methods of contraception which the Catholic Church strongly
promotes; they do not require synthetic measures rather they focus on periods of abstinence (IPPF, 148).
One such technique is the basal body temperature method; this is where females record their temperature
immediately after waking each morning. Throughout the early phase of the cycle just following
menstruation the temperature will be low. Ovulation is indicated by an increase of 0.2-0.4C rise in
6

temperature, the female then abstains from intercourse for 3 consecutive days of high temperature (IPPF,
p149).
Another technique practiced is the cervical mucus method; this involves monitoring the vaginal and
cervical mucus. At ovulation when oestrogen levels are raised the mucus is thick, sticky and opaque
looking, women must abstain from intercourse until their mucus returns to a thin, clear and slippery
consistency (IPPF, p151).
Family planning methods have allowed women that are not prohibited by culture to use barrier or oral
contraceptives to control their fertility and plan their families. Such methods require dedication to be
effective as they require long periods without intercourse. They have impacted society by decreasing the
average sizes of families.
Barrier methods of contraception such as condoms are a common form contraception. They are widely
available at a low cost throughout the world; this has resulted in their wide use amongst males and
females. When used correctly the latex rubber condoms are effective at preventing pregnancy and
sexually transmitted infections. Condom use has an effectiveness rate of around 95% with pregnancies
per 100 women varying between 2 and 15 (Everitt & Johnson, p256).
Diaphragms, cervical caps and spermicides are other forms of barriers that act to prevent the passage of
sperm entering the female reproductive tract during intercourse (Everitt & Johnson, p258).
The development of the female contraceptive pill has allowed the suppression of ovulation through a
combination of oestrogen and progesterone or progesterone only doses. This has a high effectiveness
when taken correctly and is economical at a cost of around $5 a month (Everitt & Johnson, p259). Pill
use is associated with an effectiveness rate of around 98% with pregnancies per 100 women varying
between 1 and 3 (Everitt & Johnson, p256). There is also a combination of three pills that can be taken
up to 72hrs after unprotected intercourse that prevent fertilization as a result of their high levels of
oestrogen and progesterone.
Another contraceptive that is available for women is the intrauterine device. This is made of copper and
is inserted in the uterus to produce a uterine environment that does not allow the sperm to transport
through and prevents fertilization. (Everitt & Johnson, p263). This form of contraception is considered
to be as effective as the combined oral pill (Everitt & Johnson, p263).
Another modern contraceptive measure is the Implanon implant, this works to prevent pregnancy for a
period of three years. It is a small plastic rod that is implanted under the skin of the upper arm. The rod

releases slowly a low dose of progesterone into the bloodstream. When inserted by a doctor Implanon is
highly effective preventing pregnancy in over 99% of cases (FPWA, 2005).
ABORTION
This can be a legitimate choice for couples or women that are faced with pregnancy that could result in
abnormal outcomes and that could harm the mother. We view this as a reproductive technology and
method of contraception as it is an approach to fertility control that all communities use. The procedure
usually occurs during the first trimester of pregnancy using either the dilation of the cervix by metal
sounds or scraping of the conceptus with a curette or vacuum aspiration. However, the procedure does
entail the risk of future infertility as the result of infections that could arise (Everitt & Johnson, p264).
This use of this procedure is highly controversial, and often sparks debate which is emotionally charged.
Debate surrounds the concept of human rights, with one argument insisting it is the mothers right to
choose, and another who argue for the childs right to survive.
In China, women and their families are pressured by population-control officials who are criticized for
having no regard for human rights. Unmarried couples in China are not considered allowed to have
children.
Nine studies were carried out in seven urban areas and two rural areas to uncover information about the
sexual activity and contraceptive use amongst these populations. It was found that there is an unmet
need for temporary methods of contraception in the urban areas of China (Garner et al 2004). Unmarried
women had typically experienced sexual activity and up to one-third in some areas had had a previous
pregnancy. A striking majority of those women who had become pregnant had an induced abortion.
Inducted abortions occurred in 86% to 96% of women across the regions (Garner et al 2004).
Abortion clinics in Beijing, Changsha, and Dalian were surveyed from January to September in 2002
using self-administered questionnaires to determine the rates of repeated abortion and contraceptive use
among unmarried young women seeking abortion in China (Cheng et al 2004). Over this time 4547
unmarried women came to the clinics seeking an abortion. Of these women, 33% reported having had
one previous induced abortion. Of those who had had more than one abortion only one-third used
contraception at their first sexual intercourse following the procedure. Of the 446 women who did use
contraception 41.3% used the withdrawal or rhythm methods. Condom use was characteristic of 65% of
the sample, although only 9.6% did so correctly and as a consistent contraceptive choice. Of the

pregnancies 47.7% were the result of not using contraception and the remaining 52.3% were related to
contraceptive failure (Cheng et al 2004). Similar studies have found that failure of contraceptive
methods and unprotected intercourse greatly contributes to the high incidence of abortions (Xiao and
Zhao 1997).
FAMILY
The group of peoples, related by kinship or similar close ties, in which the adult assume responsibility
for the care and upbringing of their natural or adopted children.

10

CONCLUSION
Though reproductive choice is basically a personal decision, it is not totally so. This is because
reproduction is a process which involves not only the person who makes the choice, but it also involves
the other partner, the family, society and the world at large. It is therefore not surprising that
reproductive choice is affected by the diverse contexts, sexual morals, cultures and religions, as well as
the official stance of different societies.
When considering these issues it is important to remember the reality of the abilities and limitations of
these technologies. Although their have been sizable developments in the field, those who successfully
utilize these services currently represent a minority of the population.
There is general agreement however that there will be considerable future development in this
discipline; that will encompass both foreseen and unforeseen implications for society. Nonetheless, the
impact and extent of these implications remains under deliberation.

References
Borrero, C (2003) Gamete and embryo donation Gamete source, manipulation and disposition

11

Cheng, Y., Gno, X., Li, Y., Li, S., Qu, A. and Kang, B. 2004, Repeat induced abortions and
contraceptive practices among unmarried young women seeking an abortion in China, International
Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 87, pp. 100-202.
Cram, D. and de Kretser, D. 2002 Genetic Diagnosis: the future, in C. Jonge and C. Barratt (eds)
Assisted Reproductive Technology: Accomplishments and New Horizons, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, pp. 186-205.
Edwards, J et al (1993) Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception
Manchester University Press, New York pp. 2, 33-34
Englert, Y et al (2004) Sperm and oocyte donation: gamete donor issues Internaltional Congress Series
vol 1266 pp. 303-310
Everitt, BJ, Johnson, MH, 2000, Essential Reproduction Third Edition, Blackwell Science, Australia,
p251-265.
Family Planning Western Australia (last updated 22/8/2005), Contraceptives, [online], available from:
http://www.fpwa-health.org.au/.
Fertility Issues. (2005). [Online]. Available from:
<http://babycenter.com/refcap/preconceptio/fertilityproblems/index> (5 September 2005).
Garner, P., Qian, X. and Tang, S. 2004, Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion among unmarried
women in China: a systemic review, BMC Health Services Research, vol. 4.
Johansson, A., Lofstedt, P. and Shushheng, L. 2004, Abortion patterns and reported sex ratios at birth in
rural Yunnan, China, Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 12, pp. 86-95.
Kaz, P et al (2002) The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies Fertility
(online) Available: http://www.nature.com/fertility/content/full/ncb-nm-fertilitys29.html 10th
September 2005)
Kleinman, RL, 1988, Family Planning Handbook for Doctors Sixth Edition, International Planned
Parenthood Federation, London, p17-151.
McElroy, W. 2004, Chinas missing women,
http://www.liberator.net.articles/McElroyWendy/ChinaGirls.html Accessed 28/08/05.
Saladin, K. 2001 Anatomy and Physiology: The Unity of Form and Function, (2nd edn), McGraw-Hill,
New York.
Serour, G (1996) BIOETHICS IN INFERTILITY MANAGEMENT IN THE MUSLIM WORLD The
European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians vol 2: 2
(online) Available: http://www.obgyn.net/eago/art12.htm

12

Vayena, E et al (1997) International Working Group for Registers on Assisted Reproduction (online)
Available: http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/infertility/3.pdf (8th September 2005)
Wikipedia (2005) Infertility (online) Avaliable: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infertility
(6th September 2005)
Xiao, B. and Zhao, B. 1997, Current practice of family planning in China, International Journal of
Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 58, pp. 59-67.

13