Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_______________________________,
Appellant,
-versus-
Case No.
Prefatory Statement
Yet,
those who possess these are often not only unrewarded, but also
punished for standing up for their principles.
where
politics
can
kill
public
servants
In a government
dedication
and
The Appellant files this Appeal in the fervent hope that the
resolution of the issues in this case will enrich law and
jurisprudence, instill belief in justice and fairness and inspire the
few who remain vigilant in their fight against corruption.
The Case
The Parties
The Appellants
Qualifications
1.
Outside of
2.
de
Jesus
invited
him
to
rejoin
government
as
corrupt
agencies in
government.
After Secretary
Appellants contributions
to reform in the DepED
He graduated magna cum laude and garnered two awards for academic
excellence James L. Hagerty Award (School of Liberal Arts) and St. Thomas
Aquinas Award (Integral Program).
2
He was an Edward S. Mason Fellow in International Development.
1
9.
Providing
direct
funding
releases
from
the
Re-engineering
the
Departments
Provident
of schools
stakeholders,
government
Brigada
the
units
Eskwela
involving
local
and
various
community,
the
private
significantly
school
local
sector.
minimized
10.
punishing him.
Terminated by
Malacanang
A copy of this
14.
(hereafter referred to as CSC) Chairperson Karina ConstantinoDavid wrote him a letter stating that:
16.
10
17.
This was
who
stated
Appellant
had
resigned
as
Copies of the
Malacanangs
post dated checques
11
19.
22.
23. The Appellant was then told that the P5 Million should
be transferred to the Zambales division office which would, in
turn, release the money to the congressmans office which would
then distribute the same to the student beneficiaries directly. To
liquidate this amount, each student was to have signed a list
similar to a teachers payroll list when the latter receive their
payslips and paychecks from the division.
24.
Appellant that she was not privy to the Presidents decisions on the
PSF but that the Fund was disbursed solely at the discretion of the
13
President.
25.
have the first P5 Million check deposited into the DepED central
office trust fund but then instructed Ms. San Pablo, DepED chief
accountant, not to transfer any funds to the Division of Zambales
until the Department received in writing a clear program of work
and the process of disbursement and liquidation from the
congressmans office.
26.
of
Budget
and
Management
(DBM)
and
the
28.
The SARO is the notice from the DBM to a department that informs the latter that funds are now
allotted and can be obligated. In effect, the SARO provides the department with the authority to
spend funds.
6
The NCA is the notice from the DBM that the cash has been deposited or transferred to the
account of the department and can be drawn against. Only at this point in time can a check be
prepared and/or released to the payee.
15
from
Congressman
Antonio
Diaz
dated
September
2005
requesting for the transfer of the two cleared checks (21 August
2005 and 3 September 2005) from the DepED central office trust
account to the DepED Division Office of Iba, Zambales. A certified
true copy of this letter is attached as Annex M.
29.
thereafter to the details of the checks nor of the projects for which
they were intended. Furthermore, she could not understand nor
explain why two of the checks would be post-dated.
Staff
called
her
and
Mr.
Mandy
Ruiz,
the
31.
Diazs office came to inquire if DepEd had deposited the first two
checks and if these could already be transferred to the division
office. The Appellant, not wanting to veer from the proper
accounting and auditing procedures, decided to return the four
checks to the Presidents Social Fund including the first one (21
August 2005) already deposited into the DepED central office trust
account and called the departments Chief Accountant, Chief
Budget Officer and Cashier to his office. The official receipt for the
second check (3 September 2005) was cancelled since this official
receipt had not yet been given to the Office of the President/PMS
and the check had yet to be deposited into the departments trust
account.
decision.
33.
story on the PCIJ weblog site which became a source of news for
other media organizations.
and
Undersecretary
Ramon
Bacani
of
the
DepED,
36.
19
38.
Arguments/Issues
I.
APPELLANT
DISMISSED
WAS
CONSTRUCTIVELY
II.
THE
ORDER
REASSIGNING
THE
APPELLANT TO THE DOLE WAS DONE
WITH GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION,
THEREFORE UNLAWFUL
Appellant, a CESO, may be reassigned
or transferred only if the following
requirements
are
met:
a)
the
reassignment or transfer must be in the
interest of public service, b) without
reduction in rank or salary, and c) no
reassignment or transfer may be made
oftener than every two years, d) the
reassignment or transfer must be
effected only upon the availability of a
corresponding position.
III.
20
Discussion
In the exigency of service, you are hereby reassigned from the Department of Education (DepEd) to
the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) to a
position at least commensurate to your Career
Executive Service rank. (Emphasis supplied)
40.
The
Memorandum,
although
purportedly
merely
21
22
other
than
the
exigencies
of
public
interest
as
10
23
13
Citing Sta. Maria vs. Lopez, 31 SCRA 651; Garcia vs. Lejano, 109 Phil. 116.
24
Reassignments
xxx
and
xxx
14
Career Executive Service Board Resolution No. 548, August 10, 2004.
25
a.
b.
c.
d.
The
26
and upon knowing the same, Secretary Sto. Tomas requested that
the Appellant be transferred to her department, perhaps intending
to make the transfer less painful for the Appellant, or at least, so
that he has a friendly Secretary to work with, considering that she
and the Appellant are both alumni of the Kennedy School of
Government.
51. On the other hand, the DOLE has three (3) career
undersecretaries, one of whom assumed office only last 30
15
27
Given the
28
We can be
29
58. Both the CSC and the CESB have written the Appellant
that termination of a CESO without cause and due process of law
is illegal. Hence, in a desperate and fraudulent attempt to lend a
semblance of legality to Appellants removal from the DepEd,
Malacanang qualified on 23 September 2005, i.e. ten (10) days
after the issuance of the termination letter, that Appellant was
terminated as undersecretary (of education) but not as CESO
(Annex I hereof). Malacanang later changed its stance and
30
Knowing
that
the
termination
(disguised
as
Philippine American Life and General Insurance Co. vs. Gramaje, G.R. No. 156963, November
11, 2004.
17
Civil Service Commission Resolution No. 030669, June 10, 2003 citing CSC Resolution No.
98-16-08, June 24, 1998.
18
G.R. No. 104216, August 20, 1993.
31
involving his superiors and his threat to file cases against them.
Although the Supreme Court admitted that it was constrained by
law to uphold the termination of a temporary employee, it did not
hesitate to express its disapproval of the real political motives
behind dismissals and declare that the removal, in fact, constitutes
grave abuse of discretion:
xxx
xxx
32
xxx
xxx
xxx
Pangilinan
was
separated
the
day
immediately following his press conference. The
Court sees the action as a retaliation. The public
respondents say they were merely terminating his
incumbency in accordance with existing law. The
Court sees that termination as a punishment.
Under the expanded definition of judicial
power in Article VIII, Section 1, of the
Constitution, the Court can declare the acts of the
public respondents as tainted with grave abuse of
discretion and therefore invalid. (Emphasis
supplied)
62. In this case, Appellant faces a formidable opponent, and
powerless, he can only take refuge in the arms of the law. Under a
Rule of Law not even the highest officer of the land should be
allowed to disregard the Constitution, the law and the rights of
civil servants.
Prayer
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, it is respectfully
prayed that the Order dated 4 October 2005 signed by the
Appellee, ordering Appellants transfer to the DOLE be nullified as
illegal and that Appellant be retained as Undersecretary for
Finance and Administration of the Department of Education.
The Appellant prays for other relief that are just and
33
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
Copy furnished:
Secretary Eduardo Ermita
Office of the Executive Secretary
Malacanang Palace
Manila City
34
______________________________
35