Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 The Center for Disease Control states that the most important way to avoid diseases is to
frequently wash hands with soap and/or hand sanitizers. http://www.cdc.gov/handwashing/
There are numerous studies on the interactions of cell membranes and detergents, most are
based on the purification, isolation and solubilisation of membrane proteins. 2 Among properties
that affect interactions between membranes and surfactants, are surfactant concentration,
location of lipids, and interactions between proteins and lipids. 3
The term surfactant comes from the words surface active agent. 4 Like cell membranes,
surfactant molecules are amphipathic, meaning they have both hydrophilic and hydrophobic
parts.5 Specifically, they are composed of long chain hydrocarbons (fat soluble) and charged ions
(water soluble). Thus, surfactant molecules are able to concentrate at the meeting between the
phospholipids of the membranes in bacterial cells, and the surrounding solution. These properties
result in a leakage of the inside of the cell membrane. Soaps and detergents are classified as
surfactants. Although their properties work in practice against bacterial cells, these surfactants
are also active against vegetative cells like Beetroot.
Hand sanitizers and soap are marketed as equally effective measures to kill pathogenic
microorganisms as well as resident bacterial flora. 6 However, various brands of soaps and
sanitizers have different components, which have distinct effects in the cell membrane of the
pathogens they are attempting to eliminate. This experiment will test the following different
soaps and hand sanitizers:
1.
2 http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/2913/9/09_chapter%203.pdf
3 (Lichtenberg, 1983; Higgins, 1987)
4 http://www.essentialchemicalindustry.org/materials-and-applications/surfactants.html
5 http://www.cemag.us/articles/2008/06/how-surface-active-agents-work
6 http://www.cdc.gov/handwashing/
Variables
Units
Uncertai
nty
What?
Why?
How?
7http://www.silsa.com.pe/intranet/InformacionProductosLimpieza/HOJASEGURIDAD/HOJA%20DE
%20SEGURIDAD%20DETERGENTE%20SAPOLIO.pdf
8 http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-an-anionic-surfactant.htm
9 http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-surface-tension.htm
10
Anti-bacterial
liquid soap
Independe
nt
Variables
Dishwashing
detergent
(SAPOLIO)
By getting
each cleanser
and mixing it
with the same
volume of
water and
inserting the
beetroot
inside for the
same amount
of time in
each trial.
Hand
sanitizer
made of 0.3%
Tricoslan.
Dependen
t Variable
Control
Variables
Au
Degrees
Celcius
C
+/0.0511
Au
+/- 0.05
C
Absorbance of
light
Temperature of
water and cleanser
mixture.
To measure how
much pigment
leaked out of the
beetroot cell and
thus the impact of
the cleanser in the
cell membrane
By using a
Vernier
Spectrophoto
meter that
graphs
absorbance of
light VS
wavelength
and selecting
the
wavelength of
550.5 nm in
all trials,
variables and
results.
To
ensure
that
temperature does not
affect the solubility
and piercing of the cell
membrane in beetroot
cells, because a higher
temperature
would
have the effect of
disintegrating
the
membrane
and
therefore disrupt the
Before each
variable, the
temperature
will be recorded
using a
thermometer to
ensure that the
solution is in
room
temperature.
Trials will also
Units
Uncertai
nty
What?
Control
Variables
Cm3
Cm
+/- 0.5
cm3
+/- 0.05
cm
Volum
e of
water
and
cleans
er
Size of
Beetro
ot
pieces
Why?
How?
Using a measuring
cylinder, the cleansers
will be measured to 0.5
cm3 and the tap water
also to 0.5 cm3 before
inserting both into the
plastic cup and before
inserting the beetroot.
Once inside the plastic
cup, they will be
checked with the
measurements there to
ensure that no mistake
has been made
A cork borer with a
diameter of 1cm and a
15 cm ruler will be used
to measure in total 25,
2 cm strands of
beetroot for every trial.
The beetroots will be
placed in line to ensure
that they are the same
size.
Beetro
ot
types
Seco
nds
+/- 0.5 s
Time
If a beetroot is left in
the solution more time
than the rest, the cell
membrane would be
more affected as
exposure time
increases. It is
important that each
beetroot spends the
same amount of time in
contact with the
solution in order to be
able to measure the
results when changing
the independent
variable
Safety
1. Be cautious with the knife and scalpel.
2. Wear glasses to ensure no red pigment enters eye or no cleanser enters eye.
3. Handle technological equipment and water with care for no collision to occur.
Materials
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Knife
Spectrometer
Logger Pro 3.7 Software
Computer
Blank sheet of paper
Cuvette
Cloth
Distilled Water
Anti-bacterial liquid soap
Regular liquid soap
Ariel antimicrobial Detergent
Hand sanitizer made of quaternary ammonium compounds
Hand sanitizer made of Tricoslan.
Tweezer
23.After, finishing recording the first batch of results, save the file in the Spectrophotometer
Software as Antibacterial Soap and open a new one.
24.Repeat steps 15 through 21. This time, taking one strand of beetroot from each plastic cup
but with Regular Liquid Soap instead of antibacterial soap.
25.After finishing recording the second batch of results, save the file in the
Spectrophotometer Software as Regular Liquid Soap.
26.Repeat steps 15 through 21. This time, taking one strand of beetroot from each plastic cup
but with hand sanitizer made of quaternary ammonium compounds.
27. After finishing the third batch of results, save the file in the Spectrophotometer Software
as Hand sanitizer made of QAC.
28.Repeat steps 15 through 21. This time, taking one strand of beetroot from each plastic cup
but with hand sanitizer made of tricoslan.
29.After finishing the fourth batch of results, save the file in the Spectrophotometer Software
as hand sanitizer made of tricoslan.
30.Repeat steps 15 through 21. This time taking one strand of beetroot from each plastic cup
but with Ariel antimicrobial Detergent.
31.After finishing the fifth batch of results, save the file in the Spectrophotometer Software as
Ariel antimicrobial Detergent.
32.End by measuring and recording room temperature for changes in environmental
conditions.
Data collection
Data Overview
The data will be analyzed to check for the hand sanitizers, soaps and detergents that induced the
strongest effect in the cell membrane of the beetroot. The mean absorbance will be calculated,
as well as a standard deviation for each cleansers results. Then, the results will be checked for
anomalies by plotting the points in a graph and discarding the results that are completely out of
range. Once the data is analyzed, a simple plotted graph will be used, without a best fit line
because line graphs are solely used to show trends in data, and these results dont show a trend
but a comparison.
Table 1: Condensed raw data collected from spectrophotometer for Absorbance (+/- 0.5 Au) in a
550 nm wavelength for each cleanser and all trials
Absorbange of light (+/- 0.5 Au) in 550nm
wavelength
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Trial 4
Trial 5
Sapolio
Detergent
Devosan
Hand
Sanitizer (0.3
% tricoslan)
Plain Liquid
Soap
Antibacterial
soap
(Tricoslan)
PURELL
alcohol
based hand
sanitizer
0.294
0.144
0.193
0.208
0.241
0.115
0.151
0.107
0.132
0.140
0.123
0.102
0.136
0.120
0.137
Sample calculations
12
Mean
Table 2: Mean values of Absorbance (+/- 0.5 Au) and standard deviation for each independent
variable.
Absorbange of light (+/- 0.5 Au) in 550nm wavelength
Standar
d
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Trial 4
Trial 5
Mean
Deviatio
n
Sapolio
detergent
Devosan
hand
sanitizer
Plain
liquid
soap
Antibacte
rial soap
0.294
0.144
0.193
0.208
0.241
0.216
0.040
0.115
0.151
0.107
0.132
0.140
0.129
0.019
0.123
0.102
0.136
0.120
0.137
0.124
0.016
Ariel
antimicro
bial
detergent
Data presentation
Graph showing absorbance VS cleanser
Evaluation of results
Analysis of standard deviation: Was the data collected far from the mean?
Evaluation of variables
Even though water and cleansers were measured with a measuring cylinder, each type of
cleanser had different consistencies so it was difficult to tell whether each was measured
accurately. For further improvements, a more accurate instrument for measuring could have
been used such as a pipette, which has a lesser uncertainty of 0.03 cm 3. Also, the cleansers
chosen could have been all liquid, instead of powder and gel, which are harder to measure.
Additionally, a ruler was used to measure the 2cm strands of beetroot, but it was later noted that
a ruler is not the most accurate instrument. To fix this, a ruler with a higher precision than one of
a classroom one, could have been used.
Although the beetroots were washed with tap water before beginning to test the destruction of
cell membrane, it is unsure whether some pigment stayed in the surroundings of each beetroot,
and if it did, if all the beetroots had the same leakage before beginning the experiment.
Therefore, the beetroots should have been washed more thoroughly to ensure that no pigment
remained of the damage done to the cell membrane once it was cut.
The best effort was done to extract pieces of beetroot from the same part, so that each strand
had the same amount of pigment. However, it was very difficult to estimate the darkness of each
strand of beetroot, so some of them were effectively darker than others. This was a problem in
the experiment, because darker beetroots would release more pigment into the solutions of the
cleansers. Some beetroots even had dark spots that could not be washed with tap water. To
improve this, it would be helpful to select a strand of beetroot before beginning the experiment
and then compare each new strand color with that model. Although it is hard to have 25
beetroots of exactly red color, it could be done with more time to collect and analyze data.
For colorless cleansers, distilled water for the calibration of the spectrophotometer was used.
Nevertheless, it would have been better to calibrate the spectrophotometer with a mixture of the
cleanser and the water, as it might have increased the amount of light absorbance if the color of
the solution was slightly denser.
The cuvettes were cleaned and shaken before being inserted into the spectrophotometer.
However, it is possible that some pigment in the solution remained at the bottom of the plastic
cup, because it was hard to mix the solution without it pouring towards the sides of the plastic
cup. This must have affected some results, because the more mixed the solution is, the more the
pigment is distributed among it and the higher the absorbance value. Therefore next time, bigger
plastic cups should be used. Preferably with a lid, so they could be shaken evenly before testing.