CASE

1. PEOPLE VS BARROZO

CHARGED

RTC

CA

SC

Direct bribery

SB: Affirmed

Affirmed
Disbarred

Malversation of Public Funds

(Intentional)

SB: Affirmed

Malversation of Public
funds

Intentional includes by
negligence
Affirmed

- Prosecutor
- Disbar
- HK ; 20k
- BP 22; Estafa
2. TORRES VS PEOPLE
-

HS principal
Malversed salaries
Accountable public officer

3. CANTOS VS PEOPLE
Duffel bag
Steel cabinet
Screw driver
4. LUMAUIG VS PEOPLE
Former mayor
Motorcycle
Cash Advances
X need demand
5. ORGANO VS SB
Plunder
BIR rep
SB = X jurisdiction
6. ESTRADA VS SB
-

Plunder
Illegal gambling
On several instances

Malversation of Public Funds

Failure of accountable officer to

render acct (218)
RA 3019 (Sect 3E)

Plunder RA 7080

Plunder (a)

SB: Affirmed

SB
1 convict
2 acquit

SB
Denied MQ
Denied OM
Denied MR

Presumption of
malversation

Failure of accountable
officer to render acct
(218)

Acquittal in graft = X
mean acquit in RPC
SB = X jurisdiction
X grade 27 or higher

Proper charge plunder

CASE
1. PEOPLE VS DALAG
-

CHARGED
Parricide

PNP police
Nail

RTC

CA

SC

Affirmed

Parricide

-VS
-P/O

-VS
- X P/O
- X other analogous
circumstance

2. PEOPLE VS REBUCAN

Double murder

Double murder

2 counts of murder

2 counts of murder

-T
-EP
-AS

FELIPE
EP
T

Separate count = X single

fatal hacking blow; x
complex crime

T abrupt and sudden

X EP X elements
X AS = absorbed by
treachery
X, D, M, In = X alleged in
info

Wife was sexually abused

Hacked
Sundang (bolo)
Buy kerosene
2 victims:
o
Felipe
o
Ranil (1 yr old)

EP
T

- VS
- VA

VS
X intoxication
X IV

RANIL
T
VS
3. PEOPLE VS LAGMAN
-

Bananacue store
Stabbed in the buttock
Tricycle
Lead pipe

4. WACOY VS PEOPLE
Eating Corn
Intestinal Bleeding
Playing Pool
Identfiied
5. PEOPLE VS PAREJA
-

Murder - Santiago
Frustrated Homicide Sicor

Murder
Less serious PI

Murder
Less serious PI

X intoxication tipsy only

X IV 4d
Murder
SLIGHT PI 2 hours; 2d
of work only

Homicide

Death caused in a
tumultuous affray

Homicide

T Santiago was caught

off guard; stabbed 4x
successively
Homicide
-

MC of Praeter
intentionem = minimum
period

Rape

Rape

Rape

Attempted Rape
No penetration of labia
majora

Statutory rape

Affirmed

Affirmed

Affirmed

Naidikit lang
Blanket
X went inside labia majora

6. PEOPLE VS GUTIEREZ
10 y.o
5 peso/10 peso
Tardy sa class kasi na-rape

7. PEOPLE VS MALLARI
6 y.o.
Inserted lighter cigarette into
vagina and A. hole 3rd degree
burn
Vulcanizing shop
8. PEOPLE VS JASTIVA
67 y.o
X erected yet
Salamat
Illumination of moonlight
Farm house

3 separate infos

9. PEOPLE VS ARGUITA

2 men
Bladed weapon
Found by her father crying in
the cottage the next day

Rape by sexual assault (2)

Statutory rape (1)

Rape

Affirmed

Affirmed

Affirmed

Affirmed

Affirmed

1 count of rape = Cahipe

o
Acquit of 1 count
of rape = unusual
for AAA not to ask
for help from
cottage to store
1 count of simple rape (266A) = Arguita

Qualified Rape

Qualified Rape
Use of deadly weapon
2 persons

Carampatana, Oporto,
Alquizola = Rape

Carampatana, Oporto,
Alquizola = Rape

Dela Cruz, Rodinas,

Bactotoy, Villame = acquit

Deprived of reason or
otherwise unconscious
Oporto = PMC of minority

226A carnal knowledge thru

intimidation

2 counts of rape = Cahipe

1 count of rape = Arguita

10. AAA vs CA
-

Rape by sexual assault

(2)
Statutory rape (1)

Rape

Grad Party
Drinking Session
Scorpion Tattoo

Carampatana, Oporto,
Alquizola = Acquit

11. PEOPLE VS LAOAG

19 y.o
Ricefield
Icepick and lead pipe
Went wild
12. PEOPLE VS VILLAFLORES

Murder = Jennifer
Rape = AAA
(Separate crimes)

Affirmed

Affirmed

SCC of Rape with

Homicide

Rape with homicide

Affirmed

Affirmed

AS used deadly
weapon
Relationship = Uncle
Affirmed

Rape with Homicide

Affirmed

Affirmed

Affirmed

Circumstancial evidence

4 y.o.
Dead little girl in blue and
yellow sack
Clairvoyant Manghuhula
Batman
13. PEOPLE VS BRONIOLA
-

13 y.o.
Grade 6 pupil raped
Fish
Bloody Bolo

14. PEOPLE VS SUANSIN

Qualified rape

Simple rape

Simple rape

Qualified Rape

QC mental disability (mild

retardation 9 to 12 y.o)

Mental retard = X alleged in

amended info

Mental retard = X alleged

in amended info

It was alleged in info

Rape

Affirmed

Affirmed

Affirmed 1(b)

Deprived of reason or
otherwise unconscious
Death penalty = offender
knew mental disability
RP

Affirmed

Deprived of reason or
otherwise unconscious

Simple rape

X alleged in info that

appellant knew mental
condition of AAA
Mental retardate =
credible witness
Affirmed

Electric fan and transformer

Mental disability

15. PEOPLE VS CATAYTAY

-

19 y.o. - mental age of 5 y.o.

Mental retardate
Shoe repairman rapist
House = 50meter/1min away
from house of AAA

16. PEOPLE VS NERIO

13 y.o.
Retarded victim 4 to 7 y.o.
Minibus
Picnic
17. PEOPLE VS OBOGNE
-

Rape

Rape

12 y.o.
Mentally retarded
Sugar cane

Affirmed

Rape

Affirmed

Affirmed

X consider mental retardation

18. PEOPLE VS JOSON

Rape

Affirmed

Affirmed

Attempted rape (1)

8 counts of rape

X attempted rape
8 counts of rape

Affirmed (Q. Rape)

Qualified by minority and
relationship

14 y.o.
Raped by brother
Pinning of arms =
force/intimidation
Brother = moral ascendancy
19. PEOPLE VS CANDELLADA
-

14 y.o.
Pregnant
Raped by father = moral
influence or ascendancy
Baby boy delivered but died

Affirmed (Q. Rape)

Qualified by minority
and relationship

20. PEOPLE VS CIAL

Rape

Qualified rape

Qualified rape

13 y.o.
Papa
Bolo on his waist
Raped by STEPFATHER
X establish minority and
relationship
21. PEOPLE VS LUCENA

Rape

X establish minority and

relationship
X know her age
X step-father = X legally
married to mother of AAA

Rape (3)

Affirmed

Affirmed

Affirmed

17 y.o.
Tricycle
5 min. interval between the 3
rape
Pointed gun
Barangay Tanod
Arrested victim for violation of
curfew of minors
22. PEOPLE VS JUMAWAN

Rape

2 separate charges of rape

Affirmed

Marital Rape
Husband raped wife
Brutal in bed
23. RICALDE VS PEOPLE

2 separate charges of
rape

Rape by sexual assault

Affirmed

Affirmed

Affirmed

Inserted penis in anus

Affirmed

Penalty under RA 7610

(victim is under 12y) = RT
(min) to RT (max)

AOL

10 y.o.
Text mates
Homosexual
Rape
Child Abuse
Open zipper
24. IMBO BS PEOPLE

AOL

Affirmed

Affirmed

11 y.o.
Father licked daughters
vagina
Incestous molestation
RA 7610 (Anti-Child Abuse)
25. GARINGARAO VS PEOPLE
16 y.o.
Malibog na NURSE
RA 7610 (Anti-Child Abuse)
Below 12 = RPC
Below 18 = Anti Child Abuse
26. DULAY VS PASCUAL
12 y.o.
Speed
Bridge to prosti

AOL under 366 in rel to RA

7610

Rape

Affirmed

Affirmed

RT (min) to RT (max)

Should be convicted under

RA 7610 = under 18 but above
12

Should be convicted under

RA 7610 = under 18 but
above 12

Rape; PIC

Rape; PIC

RA 7610 (sec 5a) = child

abused for profit
X PIC

X PIC
27. BONGALON VS PEOPLE
-

Affirmed

RA 7610 Section 10 (a)

child abuse

Affirmed

RA 9262 (Sect 5 E2 & I)

unjust refusal to give support to
minor child

Dismissed

2 info
(2) inflict psychological
violence
Sect 5 (i) in rel to Sec 6 (f) of
RA 9262 (VAWC)

Affirmed

Child abuse
Pinched on the thigh
Help him up in the armpits + hit
desk
Sleeping teacher
29. DEL SOCORRO VS VAN WIL
SEM (?)
-

Refusal to give support to

minor
Holland
Foreigner
Doctrine of Processual
Presumption
30. DIMANLIG VS PEOPLE
-

Pregnant miscarriage
Incomplete abortion
Whore house
Punch + kick + evict + ridicule
in public
VAWC
31. PEOPLE VS BAYABOS

Affirmed

Procession
Sissy
Burnt hair of child; thre stones
P/O

28. ROSALDES VS PEOPLE

RA 7610 Section 10 (a)

child abuse

Anti-Hazing
Liability of Schools and school
authority
Philippine Merchant Marine
Academy

Affirmed

Affirmed

Slight PI

5 to 7d = slight PI
X violate intrinsic worth
and dignity
Spur of the moment
P/O
Affirmed

Remanded case

Affirmed

Special QC of pregnancy
Psychological violence
Ignominy 2nd case with
public ridicule

Special QC of pregnancy
-

CRIMES AGAINST PERSONAL LIBERTY AND SECURITY

TITLE
PEOPLE VS MAMANTAK

CHARGED
Kidnapping for ransom

2 yrs old
Mcdonalds
Muslim
PEOPLE VS MUIT

Engineer
Use house a safehouse
Mitsubishi
Pajero

PEOPLE VS DIONALDO
-

Kidnapping and serious ID

Kidnapped at the gym

Alat

PEOPLE VS MIRANDILLA
Sayang ka
Sweetheart defense
Raped 27x
Gonorrhea

15 yrs old
Raped in the forest
Forced to marry
Kill if report to police

MADSALI VS PEOPLE

Kidnapping for ransom with

homicide
Carnapping

Sajiron and Maron =

ABDUCTION WITH RAPE
Sajiron and Egap =
SERIOUS ID

Kidnapping with Rape

4 counts of rape
Rape thru sexual assault

RTC
Kidnapping for ransom
RP only
X ransom 30k =
reimbursement for food and
lodging only
Kidnapping for ransom
with homicide Muti,
Pancho, Dequillo, Romeo
Carnapping
Ferrer = discharged from
criminal case state
witness
Affirmed
But X consider death in its
judgment
Affirmed

Kidnapping
4 counts of rape
1 count of Rape thru sexual
assault

CA
Kidnapping for ransom
RP to DEATH
Ransom = QC
Minor victim

Affirmed

SC
Kidnapping for ransom
RP to DEATH

Affirmed
-

Muti = actual abductor

Dequillo = procured gun
Pancho = driver of back up
vehicle
Romeo = informant

Affirmed

SCC OF KIDNAPPING
FOR RANSOM WITH
HOMICIDE

Purpose: Extort ransom

Conspiracy
X support claim of torture
Affirmed

Crime charged is actually

SCC OF KIDNAPPING
AND SERIOUS ID WITH
RAPE guilty of this crime

Sajiron = guilty of serious

ID

Delay to report incident

of rape is justifiable and
reasonable because she
feared her and her familys
death

SCC of kidnapping and

illegal detention with
rape
Death penalty RP

SCC of kidnapping with

rape
4 counts of rape
1 count of Rape thru sexual
assault

No matter how many rapes

had been committed in the
SCC of kidnapping with
rape, the resultant crime is
only 1 kidnapping with

rape single indivisible

offense