Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
According to specific characteristics of water
circulation in karst the paper attempts to define the essential
regional karst hydrological parameters. They should be used for
determining a specific regional karst hydrology which should,
at least from the methodology standpoint, be valid for all
karst terrains in the world.
Rgionalisation dans les rgions karstiques
Rsum Vu les spcificits du processus de l'coulement dans le
karst, on a essay dans ce rapport de dfinir les paramtres
essentiels, rgionaux, karstiques-hydrologiques. Ils devraient servir
l'tablissement d'une hydrologie spcifique rgionale du karst,
qui au moins d'une faon mthodologique pourrait servir pour
tous les terrains karstiques dans le monde.
INTRODUCTION
Hydrological regionalization is a very popular procedure which is used to
enable engineers to translate data, measured at one point, to points where
measurements have not been carried out. In addition to hydrological
regionalization there are other methods and approaches to regionalization;
they all deal with similar or even identical problems related to the distribution
of water in space and time. Hydrologists often make mistakes by neglecting
these other approaches by treating them as less "significant". In modern
science, the interdisciplinary approach has become a principle which is
routinely used to solve complex problems.
Hydrological regionalization, which is a complex method, should use the
principles and logic used in numerous disciplines related to hydrology and to
regionalization. All the previously presented statements refer to the general
problem of hydrological regionalization, and particularly to regionalization of
water in karst terrains. This paper tries to answer the question why these
problems are more directly present in karst. It should be stressed in advance
that the paper does not present any final solutions: it just presents, for public
discussion, some specific considerations on the hydrological regionalization
resulting from the specific conditions of karst hydrology or rather from the
runoff processes in a karst mass.
The essential principles of the hydrological process are identical in karst
and non-karst terrains, but the variations are more specific and numerous in
the conditions of flow in karst. Occasional, quite frequent, "surprises" make
135
Ognjen Bonacci
136
some laymen, and often some experts, believe that certain "mysterious"
phenomena, unexpected and unexplicable, occur in karst. A careful analysis of
these so-called "unexpected" phenomena can yield precise answers to the
position, composition and dimensions of underground and surface karst forms.
In the regionalization procedure, the non-homogeneous and anisotropic
features of the karst medium often present a great problem which sometimes
cannot be solved. Special problems arise in streamflows due to the water
sinking underground. Water losses along open channels occur frequently in
karst terrain (Bonacci, 1987). The surface runoff in karst is sporadic because
of its rapid sinking underground. The fast infiltration can be accounted for by
the specific surface features in karst which make its infiltration capacity
almost limitless. These facts explain why hydrological regionalization in karst,
as well as all other regionalizations in karst terrains, is more complex than in
other media which are more homogeneous and isotropic. This has resulted in
the fact that in the literature on hydrology, there has been almost no attempt
to carry out regionalization in karst areas.
Another important problem encountered in regionalization in karst areas
is the strong interaction between surface water and groundwater in karst. The
basic principles of physics which underlie this interaction are not particularly
complex and have been described in detail in the literature. The problems
related to their interpretation appear only due to the fact that it is not easy
to observe these processes in wide and non-homogeneous karst terrains.
Numerous measurements and an accumulated stock of experience in
organizing them are necessary to obtain accurate and reliable data
indispensable for defining parameters reliable for hydrological regionalization.
Concluding the introduction it should be emphasized that there are no
"secrets" or "miracles" in the processes of flow in karst. It is a continuous,
most frequently one-layered and occasionally multi-layered aquifer which, due
to the low effective porosity of the karst medium and its intensive
communication possibilities, reacts very quickly to external effects. These
processes become more complex because of various geological and
hydrogeological factors which can be of regional or local character. These
factors include faults, folds and thrust faults, the relations between permeable
and impermeable rocks, and small and large underground and surface
morphological karst forms.
Another problem is that it is difficult, sometimes impossible, to
determine the catchment boundaries and catchment area in karst. Frequently,
both the catchment area and its boundaries change in time depending
primarily upon the groundwater levels (Bonacci, 1988).
All the previously mentioned factors should be taken into consideration
when regionalizing hydrological parameters in karst.
RUNOFF PROCESSES IN KARST
The specific features of flow through soluble rocks in karst directly affect the
approach to the regionalization of the hydrological parameters of karst.
According to Atkinson (1986) "The soluble rocks are those which dissolve in
137
138
Ognjen Bonacci
5 6 7 8 9
10
20
30
3 ) 6 0 7 0 8O9DB0
200
300
0 600
139
1007. DIFFUSE
Ognjen Bonacci
140
141
mi
m2
33
^4
Fig. 4
Schematic conceptual models for heterogeneity
classification: 1 high yield borehole; 2 poor borehole; 3 pumping
well; 4 karst conduit or cave (according to Daoxian, 1986).
When performing regionalization in karst it should be borne in mind
that the karstification process, i.e. the solution of soluble rocks, is a continual
process which cannot be stopped, so that even the most detailed and reliable
regionalizations are only temporary. The time unit is relatively long when
compared with the human life-time, but it is very short when compared with
the geological time scale. A good linear correlation between magnitude of rain
and dissolution-rate has been observed. According to Garay et al. (1988) the
dissolution rates evaluated for Spanish karst regions vary between 20 and
more than 100 m3 km"2 year"1. The greatest dissolution rates have been
calculated under the humid climate of Papua New Guinea; up to 760 m3 km"2
year"1. The smallest rate is under arid regions, like the rate of 3 m3 km"2
year"1 measured in Salah (Sahara).
Obarti et al. (1988) present a Spanish classification of karst based on
geological features and hydrodynamic behaviour observed in hydrographs of
different system types selected according to their geographical and climatological characteristics. The aim of this classification was to record the
minimum number of data necessary for the evaluation of the input-output
relationship. The authors state that there is a strong connection between
Ognjen Bonacci
142
(1)
143
where W is the total water volume flowing out in a certain period (most
frequently one hydrological or calendar year), Wb is the volume of the
baseflow in the same period. The separation of baseflow performed in order
to define the baseflow index is not a completely denned procedure and thus
it partly depends upon the subjective estimation of the researcher.
for 0 s t < 16
n
-0.2311
-0.16071
Q{ = 24 e
+ 13.1 e
for 16 S t < 21 ~TTTTTT]
-0.16071
-0.02271
+ 2.9e
o Q o~ 0 2 2 7 1
< , = 0.2310
c 2 - 0.1607
0.0227
10
12 K ()
18 20 J 22 24
26 28
30
32
3A [ 3 hOUrS ]
(2)
a = \/A
(3)
Ognjen Bonacci
144
which the emptying through the analysed system of springs takes place. Thus
it is possible to introduce into Maillet's formula, in addition to the transport
characteristics of karst, also the influence of the storage features which change
in time and space.
Obarti et al. (1988) regionalized karst in Spain according to the outflow
depletion coefficient. They conclude: "There can be found in the same region
and subjected to equal environmental patterns, systems with short time
response to rain (memory effect and response time smaller than 10-15 days)
and fast depletion curves (oc > 10"2) corresponding to well developed karst
systems in the neighbourhood of others distinguished by inertial behaviours
(memory effect greater than two months and depletion coefficient smaller
than 10"2), representative of systems with difficult flow due to low functional
karstification degree. There must be taken into account other important
variables like system size, existence of outside aquifer runoff surpluses (binary
systems), possible palaeokarst activation
Although global karstification
degree is low (in drainage organisation sense), local karstification is a fact".
This paper includes equations of numerous researchers from the entire
world, and it can be said with great certainty that their conclusions do not
refer exclusively to the particular region they analysed, but to karst in
general.
CONCLUSION
Hydrological regionalization in karst is much more complex and less reliable
than regionalization in non-karst terrains. Before hydrological regionalization is
undertaken, a number of preliminary systematic activities should be carried
out. Firstly, it is necessary to define the exact criteria and measurements
related to the regionalization. The selection of parameters for hydrological
regionalization is an especially sensitive problem.
The parameters do not have to be exclusively hydrological. Furthermore,
it is necessary to employ parameters which, according to their nature, belong
to other scientific disciplines. This primarily refers to the geographical,
geological, hydrogeological and climatological parameters. Qualitative and
reliable hydrological regionalization, as well as other types of regionalizations,
is negatively affected by a very direct interaction between surface water and
groundwater. Obviously, the procedure of hydrological regionalization cannot
be solved by hydrologists alone. It is a typically interactive process which
implies close cooperation between researchers from various disciplines.
Insufficient collaboration might be the main reason why hydrological
regionalization in karst has not been more successful so far. It is not an
overstatement to say that the problems of selecting the representative
regionalization parameters has not been solved up to the present time either
from the theoretical or from the practical standpoint. The same applies to the
modelling of the runoff processes in karst.
More reliable results related to hydrological regionalization in karst have
been obtained for low water levels, whereas for medium, and particularly for
high water levels there have not been any improvements. It is relatively easy
145
to explain this fact. At low water levels there exists only one flow type, i.e.
slow laminar diffuse flow. Therefore, it is easier to regionalize the parameters
for this flow due to its main characteristic, i.e. inertia.
Evidently, the hydrological regionalization in karst should strictly
consider the occurrence of two completely different flow types: diffuse and
conduit flow. Further hydrological regionalizations should probably be
oriented towards the definition of particular hydrological and regional
parameters for both of the flow types.
As a final point it should be mentioned that the reliability and time
duration of regionalization are greatly affected by human activities. The
construction of one, not particularly large reservoir in karst, can bring about a
complete change in the hydrological regime (Bonacci, 1987). This problem,
which has become acute, should not be ignored in making attempts to
regionalize the hydrological parameters in the karst areas.
REFERENCES
Atkinson, T. C. (1986) Soluble rook terrains. In: A Handbook of Engineering Geomorphology
(ed. by P. G. Fookes & P. R. Vaughan), 241-257. Survey University Press.
Bonacci, O. (1987) Karst Hydrology. Springer Verlag.
Bonacci, O. (1988) Determination of the catchment areas in karst. In: Karst Hydrogeology
and Karst Environment Protection (Proc. IAH 21st Congress, Guilin, China, October
1988), vol. 2, 606-611. IAHS Publ. no. 176.
Bonacci, O. & Jelin, J. (1988) Identification of the karst hydrological system. Example of
Dinario karst (Yugoslavia). Hydrol. Sci. J. 33 (5), 483-497.
Chen Zhi Ping (1983) Karst zonation in China. In: New Directions in Karst (ed. by K.
Paterson & M. M. Sweeting), 591-596. Geo Books, Norwich, UK.
Daoxian, Y. (1986) On the heterogeneity of karst water. In: Karst Water Resources (Proc.
Ankara Symp., July 1985), 281-291. IAHS Publ. no. 161.
Garay, P., Obarti, F. J. & Morell, I. (1988) Dissolution rates in Spanish karst regions. In:
Karst Hydrogeology and Karst Environment Protection (Proc. IAH 21st Congress, Guilin,
China, October 1988), vol. 1, 276-280. IAHS Publ. no. 176.
Gunn, J. (1986) A conceptual model for conduit flow dominated karst aquifers. In: Karst
Water Resources (Proc. Ankara Symp., July 1985), 587-596. IAHS Publ. no. 161.
Habic, P. (1969) Hidrografska rajonizacija krasa v Sloveniji (Hydrographie rgionalisation of
_ the Slovenian karst). Carsus lugoslaviae, 79-91.
Habic, P. (1981) The hydrogeological differentiation of karst areas in Slovenia. Geographica
Iugoslavica III, 52-59.
Maillet, E. (1905) Essais d'Hydraulique Fluvial Herman, Paris.
Obarti, F. J., Garay, P. & Morell, I. (1988) An attempt to karst classification in Spain based
on system analysis. In: Karst Hydrogeology and Karst Environment Protection (Proc. IAH
21st Congress, Guilin, China, October 1988), vol. 1, 328-336. IAHS Publ. no. 176.
nder, H. (1986) Interaction between conduit type flow and diffuse flow in karst formations.
In: Karst Water Resources (Proc. Ankara Symp., July 1985), 371-385. IAHS Publ. no. 161.
White, E. L. (1976) Role of carbonate rocks in modifying flood flow behaviour. Wat. Resour.
Bull. 12 (2), 351-369.