Unit 3- Outcome 3.

Assessment Task 2 (Responding) SAC

Your task is to select from either one of the artist we have focused on this term
artists of your own choice and develop a creative presentation using digital
presentations. This may be PowerPoint, Prezi, Weebly or another of your
choice.
You must study AT LEAST TWO ARTSITS. As previously stated you may select
one artist we have focused on in class (Either Frida Kahlo or Patricia Piccinini),
but not both! You must explore a new artist or select two new artists of your
choice. You must investigate the ways in which the artists have :

interpreted their subject matter

influence of the artists
historical and cultural context of the artists
communicated their ideas.

Since you are completing a COMPARISION, it would be best to select two

artists from different historical and cultural contexts.
You are also required to present your creative presentation to the class and
You must include a reference list of all of the websites, books, journals and
resources you have used.
You are also required to show your class your digital presentation and explain
who you artists are, what work they created and identify the similarities and
differences between them. This will be completed in class time and will be a
duration of 5-10 minutes.

Assessment Rubric:

Name:______________________________

Analyses ways in
which artworks
reflect artists
interpretations of
subject matter.

Analysis of artworks
is detailed, clear
and concise. All
artworks are
interpreted in
detail.

Analysis of artworks
is relatively detailed
and clear. Most
artworks are
interpreted in
detail.

Analysis of artworks
is limited in detail
and not very clear.
Only selected
artworks have been
interpreted.

Analyses ways in
which artworks
reflect artists
influences.

Inclusion of artistic
influences is clear
and detail for both
artists.

Inclusion of artistic
influences is
included with a
good
understanding.

Inclusion of artistic
influences is quite
limited and lacks
clarity.

Analysis of
artwork is lacking
explanation or is
not included.
Artworks are not
discussed in
detail.
There is limited or
no inclusion of
artistic influences
within the work.

Analysis ways in
which artworks
reflect artists culture
and historical
context.

An in depth, clear
analysis of the
artists culture and
historical is
included for both
artists.
Makes detailed and
clear comparisons
between the ideas
and meanings of
artworks.

A thorough analysis
of the cultural and
historical contexts
of the artworks is
included for both
artists.
Makes clear
comparisons
between the ideas
and meanings of
artworks.

Some attempt to
analyses with some
understanding of
the artists cultural
and historical
contexts.
Makes good
comparisons
between the ideas
and meanings of
artworks.

Little or no
analysis of the
artworks cultural
and historical
context is
included.
Limited or no
comparison
between the ideas
and meanings of
artworks.

Uses high level of

art language to
successfully
represented the
artists use of
materials,
techniques and
processes.
An in depth and
sound analysis of
the art elements
and principles
included within the
artists work has
been included. A
clear link and
description of how
they contribute to
the aesthetic
quality is also
included.

Uses appropriate
art language to
express
represented the
artists use of
materials,
techniques and
processes.
A thorough analysis
of the art elements
and principles
included within the
artists work has
been included. A
link and description
of how they
contribute to the
aesthetic quality is
also included.

Uses some arts

language to discuss
the materials,
techniques and
processes
represented by the
artists.

Little or no
attempt to use
arts language to
discuss the artists
use of materials,
techniques and
processes.

Some attempt to
analyse the art
elements and
principles included
within the artists
work has been
included. A limited
description of how
they contribute to
the aesthetic
quality is also
included.

Little or no
attempt to
analyse the art
elements and
principles
included within
the artists work
has been
included. There is
mo link or
description of
how they
contribute to the
aesthetic quality
identified.

Demonstrates
understanding of the
communication of
ideas and meanings
of the artwork.
Analysis and
discussion of ways
the artists uses
materials, techniques
and processes.

Analysis the way the

artists uses art
elements and art
principles to
demonstrate
aesthetic qualities.

Discussion of art
practices in relation
to the particular
historical and
contemporary
artworks.

Makes detailed and

clear comparisons
between the
historical and
contemporary art.
Includes the
meaning they
convey.

Makes clear
comparisons
between the
historical and
contemporary art.
Includes the
meaning they
convey.

Attempts some
comparisons
between the
historical and
contemporary art.
Includes limited
meaning in what
they convey.

Research skills
including ICT.

Thorough research
skills. Answers
given show a clear
and detailed
interpretation of
the information.
Detailed
bibliography where
appropriate.
The presentation is
completed within
5-10 minutes. It is
clear and discusses
the two artists you
have focused on
and identifies the
difference between
them.

Very good research

skills. Answers
given show a good
interpretation of
the information.
Correct
bibliography where
appropriate.

Good research
skills. Answers
given show a sound
interpretation of
the information.
Sound bibliography
where appropriate.

The presentation is
completed within
5-10 minutes. It is
relatively clear and
discusses the two
artists you have
focused on and
identifies the
difference between
them.
The digital creative
presentation has a
good amount of
detail, is relatively
easy to follow and
includes a variety of
images.

The presentation is
completed under 5
minutes. It is
rushed and lack
detail in discussing
the two artists you
have focused on
and identifies the
difference between
them.
The digital creative
presentation is
lacking detail, not
very easy to follow
and lacks a variety
of images.

Presentation of
creative presentation.

Digital creative
presentation.

The digital creative

presentation is full
of detail, easy to
follow and includes
a variety of images.

Little or no
attempt to make
comparisons
between the
historical and
contemporary art.
Does not include
the meaning they
convey..
Little or no
evidence of
research
undertaken. No
attempt to
interpret
information. No
bibliography
where required.
The presentation
not completed.

The digital
creative
presentation is
not completed or
is very limited of
detail and images.

Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________