Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 9
Rev. Date: 16 Apr 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE NO.
1.0
2.0
DEFINITIONS..............................................................................................2
3.0
REFERENCES............................................................................................2
4.0
PROCEDURE..............................................................................................4
5.0
RECORDS...................................................................................................9
6.0
PEP 213
Page 2 of 9
Rev. Date: 16 Apr 2009
1.0
The purpose of this procedure is to establish a consistent and uniform approach for the preparation of a
Project Multi-Office Engineering Execution Plan that is to be integrated into the Engineering Execution
Plan (PEP 203). This procedure applies to all projects that have engineering in their Scope of Work.
2.0
DEFINITIONS
2.1.
Multi-Office Execution
Multi-office execution is the concurrent execution of a project across more than one of the Companys
office locations. This PEP addresses multi-office execution of engineering work. Multi-office execution
may also include executing engineering work with partner organizations or subcontractors.
2.2.
The Project Multi-Office Engineering Execution Plan documents the project team's plan for multi-office
execution. The Project Multi-Office Engineering Execution Plan is to be included with, and approved as
part of, the Engineering Execution Plan (EXP). A preliminary Project Multi-Office Engineering Execution
Plan is prepared during the proposal / bid stage. The detailed plan is prepared after project award
consistent with the development of the EXP.
2.3.
The Functional Lead of Engineering is responsible for the maintenance of this procedure and will review
the procedure annually to determine any necessary updates. Should an individual employee have a
suggestion for improvement or modification to this procedure, he or she may mark-up a copy of the PEP
and send to the Functional Lead of Engineering for review. The Functional Lead of Engineering will review
the recommended changes and respond back to the employee on plans to address the suggestions.
Changes to the procedure will be distributed to other Corporate Department Managers and Corporate
Functional Leads for their concurrence. When the reviews are complete, the Functional Lead of
Engineering will consolidate and recommend changes to this PEP to the President, Washington Services
who has the authority to issue revisions to this PEP.
3.0
REFERENCES
3.1.
3.2.
3.3.
3.4.
3.5.
3.6.
3.7.
PEP 213
Page 3 of 9
Rev. Date: 16 Apr 2009
3.8.
3.9.
PEP 213
Page 4 of 9
Rev. Date: 16 Apr 2009
4.0
PROCEDURE
4.1.
Figure 4.1.1
Determine if Multi-Office
Engineering Execution is
Appropriate for the Project
Project Organization
Receive Authorization to
Proceed/Notice to Proceed
from Client
(PEP 200)
Prepare
Project Multi-Office
Engineering Execution
Plan
Project Controls
Plan/Approach
Quality Assurance
Plan/Approach
Provide Lessons Learned
Feedback
(PEPs 206 & 601)
Update Engineering
Execution Plan (PEP 203)
CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
Copyright 2008 Washington Group International, Inc. (Ohio) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
PEP 213
Page 5 of 9
Rev. Date: 16 Apr 2009
4.2.
Action By:
Action:
Manager of Engineering
7. Supports the PEM in preparation of the preliminary Project MultiOffice Engineering Execution Plan and coordinates with counterparts in the other participating offices.
B.
Action By:
Action:
PEP 213
Page 6 of 9
Rev. Date: 16 Apr 2009
Action By:
Action:
when the project circumstances change and issues a revised
EXP.
6. Provides prompt feedback to the Manager of Engineering
regarding any multi-office execution issues needing attention.
Action By:
Action:
4.3.
Instructions
4.3.1.
Prior to Project Award - Develop Preliminary Project Multi-Office Engineering Execution Plan
A.
The Project Engineering Manager shall work with engineering management as early as
possible to develop the projects multi-office execution approach as the basis for preproject planning.
B.
PEP 213
Page 7 of 9
Rev. Date: 16 Apr 2009
7. Describe general plans for the electronic interface of key systems across the
participating offices. Identify any areas of concern and include action plans for
resolving the concerns. Include IT as a participant in this planning. The planning for
each system will be led by the function having ownership of the system, i.e.
Engineering for CAE/CAD and analytical software systems, Project Controls for
Scheduling and Progress Measurement systems, Project Administration for
Document Management systems, Procurement for Materials Management systems,
etc.
8. Describe how the engineering disciplines will implement consistent work practices
across the project. The work practices will comply with the Companys Project
Execution Procedures (PEPs), Engineering Standards, the Engineering Execution
Plan, and the Project Execution Plan.
C.
It is not intended that the Preliminary Project Multi-Office Engineering Execution Plan
duplicate information included elsewhere in the Pre-Project Planning. Multi-office
execution planning should be completely embedded in all aspects of pre-project planning.
D.
4.3.2.
B.
The projects Supervising Discipline Engineers shall confirm with their Manager of
Discipline Engineering (through their local Principal Engineers) that resource
availability/capability in the participating offices supports the projects staffing needs.
C.
The Project Engineering Manager shall verify that other elements of the Engineering
Execution Plan - such as Task Definition, Design Approach, CAE/CAD Execution Plan
(PEP 204), Document Lists with Scheduled Issue Dates, Work Hour Budget, and
Engineering Staffing Plan address, are consistent with, and support the Project MultiOffice Engineering Execution Plan.
D.
The Project Engineering Manager shall ensure that other elements of project execution
planning such as the Project Controls approach, QA Plan, Project Procurement Plan,
CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
Copyright 2008 Washington Group International, Inc. (Ohio) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
PEP 213
Page 8 of 9
Rev. Date: 16 Apr 2009
Project Document Management plan, etc. address and support effective multi-office
execution.
4.3.3.
E.
The Project Multi-Office Engineering Execution Plan shall be approved, issued and
maintained as part of the Engineering Execution Plan (PEP 203). The Project MultiOffice Engineering Execution Plan shall be revised as necessary to reflect changes
regarding scope and execution requirements. The EXP will be reissued.
F.
In some circumstances a project may initially plan not to use multi-office execution, but
may later change this decision. A Project Multi-Office Engineering Execution Plan shall be
promptly prepared to support effective project execution using the multi-office execution
approach.
PEP 213
Page 9 of 9
Rev. Date: 16 Apr 2009
resolving the concerns. Include IT as a participant in this planning. The planning for
each system will be led by the function having ownership of the system, i.e.
Engineering for CAE/CAD and analytical software systems, Project Controls for
Scheduling and Progress Measurement systems, Project Administration for
Document Management systems, Procurement for Materials Management systems,
etc.
9. Describe how the engineering disciplines will implement consistent work practices
across the project. The work practices will comply with the Companys Project
Execution Procedures (PEPs), Engineering Standards, the Engineering Execution
Plan, and the Project Execution Plan.
10. Confirm that multi-office execution has been clearly and fully addressed in the
projects Compliance Plan for engineering licenses (PEP 361, Compliance with Laws
Regarding the Practice of Engineering).
B.
5.0
It is not intended that the Project Multi-Office Engineering Execution Plan duplicate
information included elsewhere in the Engineering Execution Plan or in the Project
Execution Plan. Multi-office execution planning should be completely embedded in all
aspects of project planning.
RECORDS
A copy of the Project Multi-Office Engineering Execution Plan and subsequent revisions are retained in
the project files for the duration of the project as part of the Project Execution Plan (See PEP 202). After
project completion the project files are processed in accordance with the procedure for Record Filing,
Retention, Retrieval and Destruction of Documents (see PEP 316).
6.0
6.1