You are on page 1of 2

Extreme controls from democratic conservatism

Society is always on the verge of what they call the "biological climax" when the selfdestruction of the species begins. Abundance-reproduction both are opposites that lead to
development. More abundance increases reproduction and therefore the appearance of
scarcity. Then man invents the tractor, improves transportation, canneries are created and
the abundance comes back, then, more reproduction and again the climax.
These natural cycles could be damped by applying the acquired knowledge, science in
general. But instead they use science and all available forces to preserve the established
in the nation and in the world, even in the climax.

The most obvious extreme controls took place with the "flowery wars" in the Americas,
to reduce the population and to capture prisoners to extract their heart in offerings to the
gods for prosperity. Wars to keep slavery in the world that had its summit with Spartacus.
To keep feudalism the bloody repression to serfs that had its summit with the French
Revolution. The first and second world wars were not only for the global distribution of
territories, also contributed to decrease population.
The fresh appreciation of humanism and religion of last half century was to
try avoiding very bloody events to control the population, that's why they
guided to the creation of dictatorships. But these being also ended up very
bloody and then they leaved them out too. The development of the social
sciences applied to control population advised other methods: the elimination
of leaders: rebel, pacifists and fighters for "human rights" to avoid the
possible organization of the population into a powerful force. Doing away
those characters also was improved to make it less shocking: instead of a rifle
shot from long distance, began to use isolated potential murderers who could
be excited and targeted to the desired goal.

Public people, who have had a will of submission to conservatism as politicians and
journalists, have different attention than intellectuals in general, artists and athletes in the
departments of repressive system. These last characters could make progressive
expressions, criticism to the system and others, that their fans could follow vehemently;
or any other thing that might cause an unwanted and cruel repression against them. It is
therefore important that the weaknesses of these public figures were known: hence the
sensationalism; without protection from drug abuse; exclusive and fruitful contract are
offered, for ex. in Vegas, to disappear them from public; others examples: previously
Elvis Presley and Muhammad Ali were called to military service; etc.

In a separate theme: tyrannical dictatorships of socialists or communists have also used


these scientific advances and other ruffians' mechanisms to control the population.

The protectors' newest advice to the most privileged was eliminating the middle class,
what is being doing from about five decades ago. This has been doing in different ways:
one, the absorption of enterprises by large corporations, and the other, lowering the costs
of the latter with the transfer of industries to abroad for the "competitiveness", the magic
word that justifies everything including that ruined the middle class.
Why is this "healthy advice"? Ah...! Because the middle class feels diminished and
humiliated by the exclusivity of the most powerful: the domain of politics, laws and
luxuries centers. The middle class was the only one with intellectual capacity and enough
power to support convenient leaders to its economy and by that way bring about the
change: progress, evolution, development of the social system; avoiding conservatism,
stagnation and corruption.

You might also like