Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review
Abstract
While there exists a large body of literature on cognitive functions in children with prenatal alcohol exposure, it remains undetermined
if these children exhibit a unique prole of cognitive-behavioral functioning or a behavioral phenotype. Researchers have consistently
found that intellectual functioning, as assessed by IQ tests, of children with prenatal alcohol exposure is decient. There is increasing
evidence that prenatal alcohol exposure is associated with slow information processing and attentional problems, in particular
inattentiveness. Studies examining specic cognitive abilities such as language, visual perception, and memory in alcohol-affected
children have shown performance decrements associated with increased task complexity. Children with prenatal alcohol exposure have
also been found to exhibit signicant decits in daily functional skills or adaptive behavior, with decits in socialization becoming
pronounced during adolescence. The above ndings point to the conclusion that a generalized decit in complex information processing
constitutes the central cognitive-behavioral characteristic of children with prenatal alcohol exposure. Researchers have consistently
documented that specic brain regions are more affected by alcohol than other regions. The problem of mapping focal anomalies of the
brain with a generalized pattern of decits can be solved by taking developmental processes into consideration.
r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Prenatal alcohol exposure; Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders; Fetal alcohol syndrome; Behavioral phenotype; Residual normality
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.1. Behavioral phenotype . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cognitive functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1. Intellectual ability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2. Attention and speed of information processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3. Executive functioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4. Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.5. Visual perception and visual construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.6. Learning and memory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.7. Number processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Behavioral dysfunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1. Academic performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2. Adaptive behavior. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3. Emotional functioning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Atypical brain development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Summary and conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
193
193
193
193
194
195
196
196
197
197
197
198
198
198
198
199
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.W. Kodituwakku / Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 31 (2007) 192201
193
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
1. Introduction
It is now established that prenatal exposure to alcohol
produces a range of morphological and cognitive-behavioral outcomes, commonly referred to as fetal alcohol
spectrum disorders (FASD), in the offspring. Severely
affected children on the spectrum display a pattern of
altered growth and morphogenesis, called fetal alcohol
syndrome (FAS), which is characterized by prenatal and
postnatal growth retardation, craniofacial anomalies, and
abnormal brain function reected by cognitive decits and
developmental delays. The majority of children with
substantial prenatal alcohol exposure (about 3 times as
many children as those with FAS), however, show only
some of the above features (Sampson et al., 1997) and used
to be referred to as having fetal alcohol effects (FAE).
Following the publication of the Institute of Medicine
report on FAS (Stratton et al., 1996), the term FAE has
been replaced with two new terms: alcohol-related birth
defects (ARBD) and alcohol-related neurodevelopmental
disorder (ARND). For convenience, I use the term fetal
alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) in this paper to refer to
the full spectrum of morphological and cognitive-behavioral outcomes observed in children exposed to alcohol
prenatally.
The most noticeable and devastating of these outcomes
are cognitive-behavioral decits. Over the last three
decades, researchers have made considerable progress in
delineating cognitive-behavioral functioning in children
with FASD. Despite these advances, it remains unanswered
if there is a unique pattern of cognitive-behavioral
functioning or a behavioral phenotype associated with
FASD. The identication of a behavioral phenotype will
aid in identifying those alcohol- affected children without
discernable anomalies in morphogenesis and in planning
appropriate interventions for children with FASD.
1.1. Behavioral phenotype
A behavioral phenotype refers to a characteristic
pattern of motor, cognitive, linguistic and social observations that is consistently associated with a biological
disorder (OBrien and Yule, 1995, p. 2). The task of
dening a behavioral phenotype, therefore, involves
comparing the FASD group with other neurodevelopmental groups having similar characteristics on a battery of
tests assessing motor, cognitive, linguistic, and social
functioning. In terms of causal pathways, one can
conceptualize that the teratogenic effects of alcohol cause
anomalous brain development, which in turn produces
cognitive social, and motor dysfunction. As shown in
Fig. 1, neuropsychological decits contribute to a range of
ARTICLE IN PRESS
194
Prenatal
Alcohol
Exposure
Academic
Difficulties
Genetic
Factors
Atypical
Brain
Development
Neuropsychological
Deficits
Generalized?
Specific Neural Circuitry?
Adverse
Postnatal
Environment
Domain-General?
Domain-Specific?
Emotional
Dysfunction
Social
Dysfunction
Fig. 1. A neuropsychological model of cognitive and behavioural outcomes of prenatal alcohol exposure.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.W. Kodituwakku / Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 31 (2007) 192201
195
ARTICLE IN PRESS
196
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.W. Kodituwakku / Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 31 (2007) 192201
197
ARTICLE IN PRESS
198
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.W. Kodituwakku / Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 31 (2007) 192201
199
ARTICLE IN PRESS
200
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P.W. Kodituwakku / Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 31 (2007) 192201
Noland, J.S., Singer, L.T., Arendt, R.E., Minnes, S., Short, E.J., Bearer,
C.F., 2003. Executive functioning in preschool-age children prenatally
exposed to alcohol, cocaine, and marijuana. AlcoholismClinical and
Experimental Research 27, 647656.
OBrien, G., Yule, W. (Eds.), 1995. Behavioural Phenotypes. Clinics in
Developmental Medicine No. 138. Mac Keith Press, London.
OConnor, M.J., Brill, N.J., Sigman, M., 1986. Alcohol use in primiparous
women older than 30 years of age: relation to infant development.
Pediatrics 78, 444450.
OConnor, M.J., Shah, B., Whaley, S., Cronin, P., Gunderson, B.,
Graham, A., 2002. Psychiatric illness in a clinical sample of children
with prenatal alcohol exposure. American Journal of Drug Alcohol
Abuse 28, 743754.
Rasmussen, C., 2005. Executive functioning and working memory in fetal
alcohol spectrum disorder. AlcoholismClinical and Experimental
Research 29, 13591367.
Robbins, T.W., 1996. Dissociating executive functions of the prefrontal
cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,
Series B: Biological Science 351, 14631470.
Roebuck, T.M., Mattson, S.N., Riley, E.P., 2002. Interhemispheric
transfer in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. AlcoholismClinical and Experimental Research 26, 18631871.
Rolls, E.T., Hornak, D.W., McGrath, J., 1994. Emotion-related learning
in patients with social and emotional changes associated with frontal
lobe damage. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 57,
15181524.
Sampson, P.D., Streissguth, A.P., Bookstein, F.L., Little, R.E., Clarren,
S.K., Dehaene, P., Hanson, J.W., Graham Jr., J.M., 1997. Incidence of
fetal alcohol syndrome and prevalence of alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorders. Teratology 56, 317326.
Schoenfeld, A.M., Mattson, S.N., Lang, A.R., Delis, D.C., Riley, E.P.,
2001. Verbal and nonverbal uency in children with heavy prenatal
alcohol exposure. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 62, 239246.
Simmons, R.W., Wass, T., Thomas, J.D., Riley, E.P., 2002. Fractionated
simple and choice reaction time in children with prenatal exposure to
alcohol. AlcoholismClinical and Experimental Research 26,
14121418.
Sowell, E.R., Jernigan, T.L., Mattson, S.N., Riley, E.P., Sobel, D.F.,
Jones, K.L., 1996. Abnormal development of the cerebellar vermis in
children prenatally exposed to alcohol: size reduction in lobules 1-V.
AlcoholismClinical and Experimental Research 20, 3134.
Sowell, E.R., Thompson, P.M., Peterson, B.S., Mattson, S.N., Tessner,
K.D., Jernigan, T.L., Riley, E.P., Toga, A.W., 2001a. Voxel-based
morphometric analyses of the brain in children and adolescents
prenatally exposed to alcohol. NeuroReport 12, 515523.
Sowell, E.R., Mattson, S.N., Thompson, P.M., Jernigan, T.L., Riley, E.P.,
Toga, A.W., 2001b. Mapping callosal morphology and cognitive
correlates: effects of heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Neurology 57,
235244.
Sowell, E.R., Thompson, P.M., Mattson, S.N., Tessner, K.D., Jernigan,
T.L., Riley, E.P., Toga, A.W., 2002. Regional brain shape abnormalities persist into adolescence after heavy prenatal alcohol exposure.
Cerebral Cortex 12, 856865.
Sowell, E.R., Thompson, P.M., Peterson, B.S., Mattson, S.N., Welcome,
S.E., Henkenius, A.L., Riley, E.P., Jernigan, T.L., Toga, A.W., 2002.
Mapping cortical gray matter asymmetry patterns in adolescents with
heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Neuroimage 17, 18071819.
201