Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http : //www.cigre.org
D1-216
CIGRE 2010
SUMMARY
This article provides a methodology for interpretation of the dielectric spectroscopy results for power
cables. The technique, which was introduced last decade, is based on the non-destructive time-domain
measurement of both Polarisation and Depolarisation Currents (PDC) in addition to the frequencydomain processing of the measurement results in term of Dielectric Dissipation Factor (DDF) or tan
and Capacitance (C). An ability of the technique in measuring current in the range of pA (10-12 A)
provides opportunity for any type and any voltage level of long power cables to be assessed on site
non-destructively at low voltage such as 50 V. This ensures the insulation is not degraded by the test
stress.
The article emphasizes the importance of depolarisation current, or equivalently the absorption
current, which has to be measured in conjunction with polarisation current for about equal length of
time in order to identify aging characteristics. The proposed methodology for interpretation
demonstrates a need for using both time-domain and frequency-domain results. Three diagnostic
parameters suggested are PDC shape, frequency scan of C ratio and DDF. Case studies which include
problems of water and overheating in oil-paper and XLPE cables also give the answer while the
frequency of 50 Hz or even 0.1 Hz is not sensitive to detect aging problems in cable insulation.
KEYWORDS
Dielectric, absorption, conduction, polarisation, depolarisation, capacitance, dissipation factor.
supatra@kea-consultant.com
1. INTRODUCTION
This article and [1] are intended to support each other in providing information for on-site nondestructive diagnosis of in-service power cables by means of dielectric spectroscopy technique in [2],
which was introduced last decade. This is based on the non-destructive time-domain measurement of
both Polarisation and Depolarisation Currents (PDC) in addition to the frequency-domain processing
of the measurement results (by the PDC software) in term of Dielectric Dissipation Factor (DDF) and
Capacitance (C). Details of the fundamentals for dielectric spectroscopy in time and frequency domain
are published in [3]-[4]. In 2004, an investigation of submarine XLPE cables using the PDC analyser
in [2] was reported [5].
In order to obtain reliable, accurate and best measurement results for evaluation and interpretation, the
information in [1] includes principle of test arrangement for PDC measurement on power cables with
earthed screen and isolated screen, safety during the measurement, the measurement procedure to
assess sheath damage and factors which influence the measurement.
Since the most common types of aging found in power cables are water and thermal aging (or
overheating), the methodology for interpretation is focused on these two types of aging. Case studies
presented here include XLPE cables and oil-paper cables while [1] also includes PILC cables. For the
clear insight into how the technique works and for the benefit of readers, the contents of this article are
as follows:
Background of problems in cable insulation
Background of diagnostic parameters
Interpretation:
- Cables with no problems (2 cases of XLPE cables, 1 case of oil-paper cable)
- Free water in XLPE cable
- Oil-paper cable with high load
- Combination of problems in XLPE cable
2. BACKGROUND OF PROBLEMS IN CABLE INSULATION
Every type of cable insulation, regardless of voltage rating, posseses two basic electrical properties
the ability to be polarized and in which an electrostatic field can exist. Polarisation and Conduction
phenomena occur in every electrical insulating material [3], [6] [7]. Problems in the dielectric are
produced by the mechanism of one of these two. Polarisation takes place in all the molecules of a
dielectric and causes chemical change or deterioration in the material. (The term deterioration
products will be used in this article). At the same time, conduction of a dielectric is often determined
by the presence of impurities or contaminants and is not attributed to its basic substance. (The term
contaminants will be used in this article).
Conduction in cable insulation are mostly due to water but can be any conductive particles, carbon
dust, deposits, etc., which are introduced into the internal insulation system during installation,
operation or from previous fault. (External humidity shall be minimized during measurement [1] and
will not be considered as contaminants).
Polarisation in cable insulation are mostly due to accumulation of charges at the interface of different
materials (interfacial polarisation), which can be caused by incompatibility of materials, aging of
insulating materials or any chemical reaction, etc. Examples of deteriration products are thermal aging
by-products, by-products of partial discharges, oxidation by-products, etc.
While free water or surface humidity causes conduction, water in the insulation e.g. in molecular state
or adsorbed state causes polarisation, especially interfacial polarisation. In addition, the oxygen in
water, HOH, which has a negative dipole can associate or interact with other molecules even copper or
aluminium conductor. Water trees in XLPE cable is also classified as deterioration products.
4. INTERPRETATION
This section shows how to interprete the dielectric response results through six case-studies, as
presented by table 1-6. Each table contains the charts of diagnostic parameters using for the
interpretation - PDC, C ratio and DDF. The six case studies can be grouped into four condition modes:
4.1 Cables with no problems
The difference in the interpretation between XLPE an oil-paper cable is DDF, as the materials are
different. The dry XLPE cable has DDF shape as in table 1 and 2 with the whole DDF < 10-4. The dry
oil-paper cable has the DDF shape as in table 3 and DDF at 1 Hz is close to 10-3. The consideration of
PDC and C ratio is the same for both XLPE and oil-paper cables. When C ratio is 1, the cable has no
deterioration caused by polarisation phenomena. When PDC shape has two currents very close, the
cable has no problem with contaminants. If each current is straight and follow inverse power law, the
cable is either healthy or has moisture in adsorbed or molecular state, which will be identified by C
ratio. If the current has one prominent crook as in table 5 or 6, the cable has thermal aging.
Table 1: One new XLPE cable in acceptable condition, not yet in service
(a)
1.E-0 9
1.E-10
I pol.
I depol.
1.E-11
1
1.E+0 1
PDC at 1 kV, 20 o C
1.E-0 3
(b)
C ratio
Current (A)
1.E-0 8
C ratio
DDF
A section of about 400 m of single-core 33 kV XLPE cable after installation, 0.17 F, not yet in service
10
10 0
1.E-0 1
1.E-0 5
1.E-0 2
1.E+0 0
1.E-0 1
1.E+0 0
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency (Hz)
T ime (s)
1.E-0 2
DDF at 20 o C
1.E-0 4
C ratio
1.E+0 0
1.E-0 3
(c)
DDF
PDC
Interpretation
Normal shape
Evidence or support
Acceptable shape
Likely surface leakage, as test was done without
cable terminator.
OK
Acceptable
New, unused
(a)
1.E+0 1
PDC at 200 V, 21 o C
1.E-0 3
1.E-0 9
1.E-10
I pol.
I depol.
1.E-11
1
10
10 0
C ratio
1.E+0 0
1.E-0 2
T ime (s)
DDF
(b)
C ratio
Current (A)
1.E-0 8
C ratio
Single-core 33 kV XLPE cable, age 4, length 2 km, 0.59 F
1.E-0 1
1.E+0 0
(c)
DDF at 21 o C
DDF
PDC
1.E-0 4
1.E-0 5
1.E-0 2
Frequency (Hz)
1.E-0 1
1.E+0 0
Frequency (Hz)
Interpretation
Normal shape
Evidence or support
Acceptable shape
Notice to monitor change in future.
(as C ratio as well as DDF is acceptable).
Acceptable.
Still acceptable.
Table 3: One 26-year-old oil-paper cable in good condition. Moisture in paper < 0.5%
PDC
1.E+0 1
PDC at 30 V, 24 o C
(a)
(b)
1.E-0 1
1.E-0 8
I pol.
I depol.
1.E-0 9
10
10 0
1,0 0 0
10 ,0 0 0
1.E-0 3
DDF at 24 o C
1.E-0 1
1.E-0 3
1.E-0 4
1.E+0 0
1.E-0 3
Frequency (Hz)
T ime (s)
1.E-0 2
(c)
1.E-0 2
C ratio
1.E+0 0
1.E-0 4
1.E-10
DDF
DDF
1.E-0 7
C ratio
Current (A)
1.E-0 6
C ratio
33 kV 3/C oil-paper cable, 4 km length, age 26, C 3.04 F, moisture in paper < 0.5%
1.E-0 2
1.E-0 1
1.E+0 0
Frequency (Hz)
Interpretation
Good shape
Evidence or support
Acceptable shape.
Small conduction.
Low deterioration products.
Good (for oil-paper cable).
Normal
Good
Pressure of oil is in control.
The 26-year-old oil-paper cable is still in good condition.
PDC at 500V, 20 o C
A, I pol.
1.E-0 9
A, I depol.
Current (A)
1.E-0 8
(a)
B, I pol.
B, I depol.
1.E-10
1.E-11
1
10
10 0
1,0 0 0
10 ,0 0 0
T ime (s)
1.E+0 1
DDF
1.E-0 2
(b)
(c)
DDF at 20 o C
1.E-0 3
DDF
1.E-0 7
C ratio
22 kV 600m 3/c XLPE cables, age 21, length 600 m
C ratio
PDC
Phase A
Phase B
1.E+0 0
1.E-0 4
1.E-0 3
1.E-0 2
1.E-0 1
1.E-0 4
1.E-0 5
1.E-0 4
1.E+0 0
Phase A
Phase B
1.E-0 3
Interpretation
Both cables have similar level of deterioration in
insulating materials.
Overall normal shape. OK even current at initial
time is slightly higher (as DDF at 0.1-1 Hz is not.
much higher than 1E-4).
Contaminants especially water is unacceptable.
The earlier I pol. deviates from I depol., the poorer
the insulation is.
Acceptable because the constant shape of conduction current has not shown up.
No water tree or other deterioration products.
- DDF at 0.1 Hz - 1 Hz (or 50 Hz) is not
sensitive in detection of water in XLPE cable.
- DDF of phase A is unacceptably high.
1.E-0 2
1.E-0 1
1.E+0 0
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency (Hz)
Evidence or support
-
C ratio
63 kV, > 30 years old, high load, oil impregnated paper, C 104 nF, moisture in paper 1.0-1.5%
1.E+0 1
PDC at 50V, 22 o C
Current (A)
(a)
1.E+0 0
(b)
1.E-0 9
I pol.
I depol.
1.E-10
1
10
10 0
1,0 0 0
10 ,0 0 0
C ratio
(c)
DDF at 22 o C
1.E-0 1
DDF
C ratio
1.E-0 8
1.E-0 2
1.E+0 0
1.E-0 4
1.E-0 3
T ime (s)
1.E-0 2
1.E-0 1
1.E+0 0
1.E-0 3
1.E-0 4
1.E-0 3
1.E-0 2
1.E-0 1
1.E+0 0
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency (Hz)
DDF
Interpretation
Acceptable shape.
Acceptable shape.
Evidence or support
High loading
4.4 Combination of problems in XLPE cable (damaged sheath and high load)
This PDC shape is the case of overheating or thermal aging. DDF is extremely high for XLPE cable.
The increase of C ratio at very low frequencies can mean water tree and thermal aging products in
combination but interfacial polarisation of water is more likely due to the high permittivity of water.
Table 6: One 25-year-old XLPE cable having problems with overheating and likely water tree
PDC
1.E+0 1
PDC at 50V, 15 o C
(a)
1.E+0 0
(b)
1.E-0 8
I pol.
I depol.
1.E-0 9
1
10
10 0
1,0 0 0
10 ,0 0 0
T ime (s)
DDF:
Overall conclusion:
DDF
1.E-0 7
C ratio
Current (A)
1.E-0 6
C ratio
Single core 33 kV underground XLPE cable, age 25, length 1.5 km, C 0.9 F
C ratio
1.E+0 0
1.E-0 4
1.E-0 3
1.E-0 2
DDF
(c)
DDF at 15 o C
1.E-0 1
1.E-0 2
1.E-0 1
Frequency (Hz)
Interpretation
Thermal aging or overheating.
1.E+0 0
1.E-0 3
1.E-0 4
1.E-0 3
1.E-0 2
1.E-0 1
1.E+0 0
Frequency (Hz)
Evidence or support
High loading (but not necessary as
can be caused by high dielectric loss)
5. CONCLUSION
The diagnosis of in-service power cables requires the results of dielectric spectroscopy in both time
and frequency domains. Three diagnostic parameters are used in the interpretation PDC (both
polarisation and depolarisation currents), C ratio and DDF. While free water causes the deviation of
polarisation current from depolarisation current and increase DDF without increase C ratio, water tree
in XLPE cable or water in adsorbed or molecular state of oil-paper cable lifts the PDC amplitude
without changing the PDC shape, increase DDF and increase C ratio at very low frequencies. The
shape and magnitude of DDF are different between XLPE cable and oil-paper cable. Finally the case
studies show frequency 0.1 Hz is not low enough to diagnose aging problems in power cables.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]