Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research paper
Shri A.M.M. Murugappa Chettiar Research Centre, Taramani, Chennai, 600113, Tamilnadu, India
Marine Algae Research Division, Post Graduate and Research Department of Botany, Alagappa Government Arts and Science College, Alagappa University,
Karaikudi, Tamilnadu, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 9 April 2015
Received in revised form
4 February 2016
Accepted 23 March 2016
Seaweeds are marine macroalgae found abundantly and viewed as potential source of phycocolloids to
produce biofuel. In this study, seaweed spent biomass obtained from alginate production industry and
biomass obtained after pigment extraction were found to contain a considerable amount of phycocolloids. These two spent biomasses were investigated for the production of ethanol. In this study, the
red seaweed spent biomass of Gracilaria corticata var corticata showed higher content of polysaccharide
(190.71 30.67 mg g1 dry weight) than brown seaweed spent biomass (industrial)
(136.28 30.09 mg g1 dry weight). Hydrolysis of spent biomasses with different concentrations of
sulfuric acid (0.1%, 0.5% and 1%) was also investigated. Brown seaweed spent biomass and red seaweed
spent biomass exhibited high amount of sugar in 0.5% and 1% sulfuric acid treatment, respectively.
Proximate and ultimate composition of seaweed spent biomasses were analysed for energy value. The
FT-Raman spectra exhibited similar stretches for both acid hydrolysed spent biomasses with their
respective standards. Ethanol produced through a fermentation process using spent hydrolysates with
baker's yeast at pH 5.3 was found to be signicant. The ethanol yield from brown seaweed spent biomass
and red seaweed spent biomass was observed to be 0.011 g g1 and 0.02 0.003 g g1 respectively, when
compared with YPD (0.42 0.03 g g1) and D-galactose (0.37 0.04 g g1) as standard on day 4. The
present study revealed the possibility of effective utilization of spent biomass from seaweed industry for
ethanol production.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Seaweed spent
Gracilaria corticata
Mild-acid treatment
Fermentation
Baker's yeast
Bioethanol
1. Introduction
Fossil fuels accounted for about 88% of the global primary energy consumption [1]. The depletion of fossil fuels, increased cost of
fuels, concern about global climatic changes and increased CO2
emission have led to the discovery of bio-fuels [2]. Biofuels are
liquid or gaseous fuels produced from plants, including microalgae,
and seaweeds [3], municipal wastes [4] and agricultural or forest
by-products [5,6]. Among biofuels, bioethanol, a renewable source
of energy, has been accepted more widely as an alternative to fossil
fuels.
Seaweeds are macroalgae found abundantly on east and west
Abbreviations: BS, brown seaweed spent; RS, red seaweed spent; DW, dry
weight.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: perumalk@mcrc.murugappa.org (K. Perumal).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.031
0961-9534/ 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
coast of India and broadly classied into red, brown and green
forms based on colour and biochemical composition [7]. Seaweeds
have many bioactive compounds like pigments, sulfated polysaccharides such as agar, carrageenan and alginates, that are used
for various industrial applications [8,9]. Gracilaria sp., Kappaphycus
sp. and Sargassum sp., are well known for agar, carrageenan and
alginates production at an industrial scale level, respectively.
Nearly 7.5e8 million tonnes of wet seaweeds are harvested
worldwide per year [10]. The production of macroalgae is
15.5 million tonne fresh weight per annum and contributes 93%
commercial value of seaweeds in 2008 worldwide [11e14]. Saccharina latissima (previously known as Laminaria saccharina) is the
fastest-growing seaweed called gigantic kelp species. This seaweed
is similar toSaccharina japonica of which 4 million tonnes fresh
weight is harvested annually in Northern China, and almost
0.3 million tonne fresh weight of S. japonica was also harvested in
Korea whereas from Japan reported for about 50,000 tonnes
[9,15e17]. Commercially important seaweeds such as Gracilaria sp.,
Sargassum sp., were cultivated long before since 1960 and 1970 in
India and even today Central Salt and Marine Research Institute
(CSMCRI), Mandapam and Bhavnagar, India successfully cultivated
Gracilaria edulis commercially and developed a technology to grow
onshore [10,18,19].
Agar (1179 tonne) and alginate (3180 tonne) production in India
seems to be very less when compared to world scenario up to
2003e2004 [10]. The huge amount of spent biomass generated
from seaweed industry worldwide and effective utilization of those
spent is really a challenging task. In India, some seaweed industries
are converting the spent seaweed biomass to agricultural manures
through composting. Though composting is a simple process, the
current status of biofuel production through waste has become an
innovative method to convert waste into a more valuable product.
The seasonal variations in algal sugar quantity may vary
depending upon climatic conditions. The phycocolloids such as
agar, carrageenan and alginates after acid pretreatment can be
effectively utilised by yeast for ethanol production [20e22]. However, yeast has a narrow substrate range such as six-carbon sugars
[23] for its growth and ethanol production. Mostly seaweed yields
ve-carbon and six-carbon sugars on hydrolysis by acid or alkali. In
order to convert polysaccharides to monosugars, an effective pretreatment process is necessary. Mild acid treatment was found to
be effective on hydrolysis of polysaccharides at a particular temperature [24e26]. Saccharication and hydrolysis are essential for
bioconversion of substrate. Enzymatic hydrolysis is a method for
converting of polysaccharides into monosaccharides and can be
widely used for ethanol production but cost increases invariably
[27]. Acid cleaves b-1-4-glycosidic bond of cellulose and other
complex polysaccharides [28]. Monosugars formed due to hydrolysis are found to be valuable substrates for bioethanol production
[29e31].
Ethanol production of hexose sugars is easy and redeox
balanced, while production from pentoses or mannitol generates
surplus hydrogen. Many bacteria overcome by transhydrogenase
production, but yeast cannot produce transhydrogenase to solve
this problem. Yeasts can overcome the problem by controlling
supply of oxygen, which leads to complete oxidation of the sugar to
CO2 and water, and reduces ethanol yields [32e34].
The ethanol production has been reported from seaweeds such
as green (Ulva lactuca, Ulva pertusa); red (Kappaphycus alvarezii,
Gelidium amansii, Gelidium elegans, Gracilaria salicornia); and
brown (Laminaria japonica, Laminaria hyperborea, Saccharina latissima, Sargassum fulvellum, Undaria pinnatida, Alaria crassifolia)
[35]. Apart from whole seaweeds, the industrial spent, such as
oating residues, spent biomass can also be used for ethanol production [5].
The prospective of ethanol production from seaweeds is based
on the carbohydrate content (60% of dry weight) and a conversion
(90%) ratio to produce ethanol. Through fermentation, 1 g of sugar
can yield 0.4e0.5 g of ethanol or 0.22 kg or 0.27 L ethanol from 1 kg
dry weight seaweed biomass, equivalent to approximately 0.05 L
ethanol per kg wet weight [34].
However, the global demand for bioethanol continues to be an
interesting research for human benet and industrial applications.
World production of bioethanol reached over 51,000 million litres
in 2007 [36]. The world ethanol market is projected to reach
100 billion litres per annum by the year 2012 [37]. Global demand
of ethanol is currently 86 billion litres [38].
The present study is aimed at production of ethanol by utilizing
spent biomass generated from seaweed processing industry using
baker's yeast and its potential of converting galactose and alginate
monomers to bioethanol through fermentation.
149
2.2.1. Analysis of pH
BS biomass collected from industry contains water along with
biomass and appears to be semi solid in nature which was analysed
using pH meter at room temperature; RS biomass prepared in the
laboratory (after extraction of phycobiliproteins using buffer), obtained as solid biomass, was analysed using pH paper at room
temperature.
150
from RS. Meinita et al. [30] reported that 10% w/v of substrate
concentration was found suitable for acid hydrolysis at 130 C for
15 min and Cho et al. [24] also reported 13% w/v in 75 mM sulfuric
acid at 121 C for 60 min, but in the present study, only 8% w/v of
substrate was found suitable for acid hydrolysis and yielded a
maximum amount of reducing sugar (13.07 0.008 mg g1) at
121 C for 20 min (Tables 1 and 2). The 1% H2SO4 treated spent
extract was analysed in FT-Raman along with standard substrates
such as agar, D-galactose and alginic acid. The FT-Raman spectrum
of acid treated hydrolysate of RS biomass showed bands at 748 and
781 cm1 similar to the spectrum of commercial agar which
showed bands at 740 and 771 cm1 and standard D-galactose at
764 cm1 (Fig. S1 in supplementary material) representing skeletal
bending of the galactose ring. The study corroborates with the
ndings of Pereira et al. [51] conrming the presence of galactose
units. The spectral studies of commercial alginic acid showed bands
at (Fig. S2 in supplementary material) 946 cm1 for OeH deformation, 1025 cm1 and 1070 cm1 for guluronic units, 1105 cm1
for mannuronic units and 1409 cm1 for CH2 groups deformation;
Similar bands were observed in 948, 1033, 1092, 1112 and
1397 cm1 for acid treated hydrolysate of BS (Table 3) conrming
the presence of guluronic and mannuronic which was in agreement
with the study of Pereira et al. [51].
Table 1
Optimization of seaweed spent biomass pretreatment using H2SO4.
Concentration of H2SO4 (v/v) (%)
62.62 4.36
65.92 8.05a
81.67 3.30b
0.1
0.5
1
Values are expressed as the mean SD (n 3). Values in the same column having
the same letter are not signicant (P < 0.05).
pigment extraction using cascade approach and the left out residue
was used for pyrolysis for energy production where the ash content
was reported to be 20.88% DW. The ash content (15.2% and 20.1%)
obtained in this study was found to be accordance with Francavilla
et al. [41].
The ultimate analyses of BS and RS biomasses resulted in 33.11%
and 32.80% of C, 3.65% and 5% of H, 1.53% and 1.08% of N, 2.44% and
1.82% of S, respectively, on a dry weight basis. Francavilla et al. [41],
reported that Gracilaria gracilis residue (after extraction of phycobiliproteins) contained 31.67% of C, 5.17% of H, 3.98% of N and 1.58%
of S. The mild acid extraction process (hydrolysis of complex sugar)
seems to not affect the algal biomass (BS and RS) composition in
terms of C, H, N, S values and it is in accordance with the composition reported by Francavilla et al. [41]. Total organic carbon found
in BS and RS biomasses were 16.24% and 16.17%, respectively, on a
dry weight basis. The total sugar in BS and RS biomasses was found
to be 136.28 30.09 mg g1 and 190.71 30.67 mg g1 (dry
weight), respectively. Total protein content in BS and RS biomasses
was observed to be 1.56 0.06 and 11.076 0.117 mg g1 (dry
weight), respectively. Total phenol content recorded in spent biomasses of BS and RS was 1.90 0.002 mg g1 and
1.62 0.004 mg g1 (dry weight), respectively.
Table 2
Optimization of brown seaweed spent biomass concentration in pretreatment.
Concentration (w/v)
2:50
4:50
6:50
8:50
10:50
169.39
139.02
108.84
94.49
65.35
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.18
0.33
12.26
13.07
4.74
4.75
4.56
151
0.003
0.008
0.006
0.008
0.005
Table 3
FT-Raman spectra of standards substrates and spent biomass.
Wave number (cm1)
Band number
10
Agar
D-Galactose
RS
Alginic acid
BS
740.8
703.3
748.5
735.3
699.4
771.9
764.3
781.6
e
787.6
843.7
828.9
827.6
803.3
813.4
891.5
888.21
892.5
877.9
859.1
937.5
956.3
927.7
946.3
948.1
1080.4
1067.5
1073.4
1025.0
1033.0
1252.5
1247.0
1248.0
1070.2
1092.6
1286.6
1307.02
1280.0
1105.5
1112.9
1413.0
1402.9
e
1301.3
1298.7
1472.2
1487.8
e
1409.8
1397.2
RSe Red seaweed spent biomass, BSe Brown seaweed spent biomass.
152
YPD
1.0
D-Galactose
0.8
Red. sugar
% EtOH
1.0
0.8
Red. sugar
% EtOH
0.9
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.0
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.2
g/g EtOH
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.6
g/g EtOH
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.1
-0.2
0.0
0.0
-1
-0.2
-1
Days
Days
0.03
0.03
0.03
Red. sugar
% EtOH
0.01
0.10
0.00
-1
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
g/g EtOH
0.15
0.02
g/g EtOH
Red. sugar
% EtOH
0.00
0.00
-1
Days
Days
Fig. 1. Reducing sugar depletion and ethanol yield from standard substrates (YPD and D-galactose) and seaweed spent biomass (red and brown).
complex sugars to simple monosugars for high ethanol yield. Increase in concentration of acid may lead to produce more HMF
(Hydroxymethyl Furfural) than simple sugars such as galactose or
Table 4
Comparison of ethanol yield from various seaweed feedstocks.
Seaweeds
Red seaweeds
Gracilaria verrucosa
Kappaphycus alvarezii (cottonii)
Gelidium amansii
Gracilaria chorda
Gracilaria tenuistipitata
Kappaphycus alvarezii
E. cottonii
Gelidium elegans
Gracilaria salicornia
Kappaphycus alvarezii
Brown seaweeds
Laminaria hyperborea
Undaria pinnatida
Alaria Crassifolia
Saccharina latissima
Saccharina japonica
Sargassum spp.
Green seaweeds
Floating residue (FR)
Ulva pertusa
Ulva fasciata
Ulva lactuca
Chaetomorpha linum
Gracilaria corticata spent (RS)
Industrial spent biomass (BS)
Biomass type
Microorganism
Country
Ethanol yield
Reference
India
Indonesian
Vietnam
Vietnam
Vietnam
Mandapam, India
Malaysia
Japan
China
Brazil
14.89 g L1
1.7 g L1
0.83 g L1
0.5 g L1
0.6 g L1
2.06%
0.27 g/g
55.0 g L1
7.9%
38e64.3 g L1
[21]
[29]
[30]
[30]
[30]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
Whole biomass
Discarded as waste
Whole biomass
Whole biomass
Whole biomass
Whole biomass
Norway
Korea
Japan
UK
Korea
Philippines
0.43 g g1
9.42 g L1
34.4 g L1
0.45%
7.7 g L1
2.79 g L1
[23]
[24]
[54]
[57]
[58]
[59]
Industrial spent
Whole biomass
Whole biomass
Whole biomass
Whole biomass
Pigment extracted spent
Alginate extracted spent
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae IAM 4178
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (MTCC 180)
Clostridium beijerinckii
S. cerevisiae ATCC 96581
Baker's yeast
Baker's yeast
China
Japan
India
Netherland
Denmark
India
India
0.143 L kg1 FR
30.0 g L1
0.45 g/g
0.3 g L1
15% w/w
3.02 g L1
1.61 g L1
[5]
[54]
[60]
[61]
[62]
Present study
Present study
153
154
(1956) 350e356.
[44] G.L. Miller, Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing
sugars, Anal. Chem. 31 (1972) 426e428.
[45] M.S. Taga, E.E. Miller, D.E. Pratt, Chia seeds as a source of natural lipid antioxidants, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61 (1984) 928e931.
[46] E. Barbarino, S.O. Lourenco, An evaluation of methods for extraction and
quantication of protein from marine macro and micro algae, J. Appl. Phycol.
17 (2005) 447e460.
[47] O.H. Lowry, N.J. Rosenbrough, A.L. Farr, R.J. Randall, Protein measurement
with the folin phenol reagent, J. Biol. Chem. 193 (1951) 265e275.
[48] M.D.N. Meinita, Y. Hong, G. Jeong, Comparison of sulfuric and hydrochloric
acids as catalysts in hydrolysis of Kappaphycus alvarezii (cottonii), Bioproc.
Biosyst. Eng. 35 (2012) 123e128.
[49] J.H. Reith, E.P. Deurwaarder, K. Hemmes, A. Curvers, P. Kamermans,
W. Brandenburg, et al., Bio-offshore:grootschalige teelt van zeewieren in
combinative metoffshore Windparken in de Noordzee, Energy Research
Centre of the Netherlands, Dutch, 2005.
[50] A. Philippsen, P. Wild, A. Rowe, Energy input, carbon intensity and cost for
ethanol produced from farmed seaweed, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 38
(2014) 609e623.
[51] L. Pereira, A. Sousa, H. Coelho, A.M. Amado, P.J.A. Ribeiro-Claro, Use of FTIR,
FT-Raman and 13C-NMR spectroscopy for identication of some seaweed
phycocolloids, Biomol. Eng. 20 (2003) 223e228.
[52] Y. Khambhaty, K. Mody, M.R. Gandhi, S. Thampy, P. Maiti, H. Brahmbhatt,
K. Eswaran, P.K. Ghosh, Kappaphycus alvarezii as a source of bioethanol, Bioresour. Technol. 103 (2012) 180e185.
[53] I.S. Tan, K.T. Lee, Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of seaweed solid
wastes for bioethanol production: an optimization study, Energy (2014) 1e10.
[54] M. Yanagisawa, K. Nakamura, O. Ariga, K. Nakasaki, Production of high concentrations of bioethanol from seaweeds that contain easily hydrolyzable
polysaccharides, Process Biochem. 46 (2011) 2111e2116.
[55] X. Wang, X. Liu, G. Wang, Two-stage hydrolysis of invasive algal feedstock for
ethanol fermentation, J. Integr. Plant Biol. 53 (2011) 246e252.
[56] P.I. Hargreaves, C.A. Barcelos, A.C. Augusto da Costa, N. Pereira Jr., Production
of ethanol 3G from Kappaphycus alvarezii: evaluation of different process
strategies, Bioresour. Technol. 134 (2013) 257e263.
[57] J.M. Adams, J.A. Gallagher, I.S. Donnison, Fermentation study on Saccharina
latissima for bioethanol production considering variable pre-treatments,
J. Appl. Phycol. 21 (2009) 569e574.
[58] J. Jang, Y. Cho, G. Jeong, S. Kim, Optimization of saccharication and ethanol
production by simultaneous saccharication and fermentation (SSF) from
seaweed, Saccharina japonica, Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 35 (2012) 11e18.
[59] M.G. Borines, R.L. de Leon, J.L. Cuello, Bioethanol production from the macroalgae Sargassum spp, Bioresour. Technol. 138 (2013) 22e29.
[60] N. Trivedi, C.R.K. Reddy, R. Radulovich, B. Jha, Solid state fermentation (SSF)derived cellulase for saccharication of the green seaweed Ulva for bioethanol
production, Algal Res. 9 (2015) 48e54.
[61] H. Wal, B.L.H.M. Sperber, B. Houweling-Tan, R.R.C. Bakker, W. Brandenburg,
pez-Contreras, Production of acetone, butanol, and ethanol from
A.M. Lo
biomass of the green seaweed Ulva lactuca, Bioresour. Technol. 128 (2013)
431e437.
[62] N. Schultz-Jensen, A. Thygesen, F. Leipold, S.T. Thomsen, C. Roslander,
H. Lilholt, A.B. Bjerre, Pretreatment of the macroalgae Chaetomorpha linum
for the production of bioethanol e comparison of ve pretreatment technologies, Bioresour. Technol. 140 (2013) 36e42.