Lab Report Rubric (Assessment Form)

Laboratory: HIGHWAY LABORATORY

ENGINEERING
Subject Code: BFC

Faculty of Civil and Environmental

EngineeringUniversitiTun Hussein Onn Malaysia

Criteria

Experiment Title : AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE

SCR

WT

TSCR (%)

Showed interest, used time very

well, guide other students and very
focused on experiment

Student can explain the results of

the experiment in detail and the ways
in which they relate to the research
focus. The student can also evaluate
the significance of the experiment to
the real situation

Attendance
&Dicipline

Student in laboratory more

than 1 hour late

Student in laboratory within

30 minutes to 1 hour late

Student in laboratory within 10

to 30 minutes late

Student in laboratory just

before laboratory start

Student in laboratory 10 minutes

earlier

Aim / Purpose

Purpose is not identified

Relevant variables are not
described

Purpose is somewhat vague

Relevant variables are not
described

Purpose is identified
Relevant variables are
described

Purpose is clearly identified

Relevant variables are described

Materials
(optional)

There is not a list of the

necessary lab materials

Most lab materials included

All necessary lab materials

included and listed

All necessary lab materials included

and listed in an organized manner

Procedure
(optional)

Procedures are not listed

Procedures are listed but not

in clear steps

Purpose is identified
Relevant variables are
described in somewhat unclear
manner
All necessary lab materials
included but not listed in any
particular order
Procedures are listed in clear
steps but not numbered and/or
in complete sentences

Procedures are listed in clear

steps
Each step is numbered and in
a complete sentence

Data lacks precision

Greater than 20% difference
with accepted values

Good representation of the

data using tables and/or graphs
Less than 15% difference with
accepted values
Precision is acceptable

Accurate representation of the

data using tables and/or graphs
Data is fairly precise
Less than 10% difference with
accepted values

Trends / patterns are not

analyzed
Answers to questions are
incomplete
Analysis is inconsistent
A statement of the results is
incomplete with little reflection
on the lab

Trends / patterns are logically

analyzed for the most part
Questions are answered in
complete sentences
Analysis is general
A statement of the results of
the lab indicates whether
results support the hypothesis

Did the job but did not appear

to be very interested. Focus lost
on several occasion

Trends / patterns are logically

analyzed
Questions are answered in
complete sentences
Analysis is thoughtful
Accurate statement of the
results of the lab indicates
whether results support the
hypothesis
Possible sources of error
identified
Used time pretty well. Stayed
focused on the experiment most
of the time

Procedures are listed in clear steps

Each step is numbered and in a
complete sentence
Diagrams are included to describe
the set-up
Accurate representation of the data
using tables and/or graphs
Graphs and tables are labeled and
titled
Data is precise with less than 5%
difference with accepted values
Trends / patterns are logically
analyzed
Questions are answered thoroughly
and in complete sentences
Analysis is insightful
Accurate statement of the results of
lab indicates whether results support
hypothesis
Possible sources of error and what
was learned from the lab discussed

Data

Analysis /
Result

Discussion

Data is not represented or is

not accurate

Trends / patterns are not

analyzed
Questions are not answered
Analysis is not relevant
No disussion was included or
shows little effort and reflection
on the lab

Participation
(during
experiment)

Student was hostile about

participating

Participation was minimal

Interview (for
short reports)

Student cannot answer

questions about the experiment

Student can answer some

questions about the experiment

NAME OF LECTURER :

Student can answer questions

about the experiment and
begins to make connections
between the experiment and its
applications

Student can explain the results

of the experiment in detail and
the ways in which they relate to
the research focus

SIGNATURE :

DATE :

TOTAL SCORE :

Note : SCR = SCORE, WT = WEIGHTAGE, TSCR = TOTAL SCORE

Lab Report Rubric (Assessment Form)

Laboratory:Geotechnic Laboratory
Subject Code: BFC31901

Faculty of Civil and Environmental

EngineeringUniversitiTun Hussein Onn Malaysia

Criteria

Experiment Title : Core Cutter Test

SCR

WT

TSCR (%)

Showed interest, used time very

well, guide other students and very
focused on experiment

Student can explain the results of

the experiment in detail and the ways
in which they relate to the research
focus. The student can also evaluate
the significance of the experiment to
the real situation

Attendance
&Dicipline

Student in laboratory more

than 1 hour late

Student in laboratory within

30 minutes to 1 hour late

Student in laboratory within 10

to 30 minutes late

Student in laboratory just

before laboratory start

Student in laboratory 10 minutes

earlier

Aim / Purpose

Purpose is not identified

Relevant variables are not
described

Purpose is somewhat vague

Relevant variables are not
described

Purpose is identified
Relevant variables are
described

Purpose is clearly identified

Relevant variables are described

Materials
(optional)

There is not a list of the

necessary lab materials

Most lab materials included

All necessary lab materials

included and listed

All necessary lab materials included

and listed in an organized manner

Procedure
(optional)

Procedures are not listed

Procedures are listed but not

in clear steps

Purpose is identified
Relevant variables are
described in somewhat unclear
manner
All necessary lab materials
included but not listed in any
particular order
Procedures are listed in clear
steps but not numbered and/or
in complete sentences

Procedures are listed in clear

steps
Each step is numbered and in
a complete sentence

Data lacks precision

Greater than 20% difference
with accepted values

Good representation of the

data using tables and/or graphs
Less than 15% difference with
accepted values
Precision is acceptable

Accurate representation of the

data using tables and/or graphs
Data is fairly precise
Less than 10% difference with
accepted values

Trends / patterns are not

analyzed
Answers to questions are
incomplete
Analysis is inconsistent
A statement of the results is
incomplete with little reflection
on the lab

Trends / patterns are logically

analyzed for the most part
Questions are answered in
complete sentences
Analysis is general
A statement of the results of
the lab indicates whether
results support the hypothesis

Did the job but did not appear

to be very interested. Focus lost
on several occasion

Trends / patterns are logically

analyzed
Questions are answered in
complete sentences
Analysis is thoughtful
Accurate statement of the
results of the lab indicates
whether results support the
hypothesis
Possible sources of error
identified
Used time pretty well. Stayed
focused on the experiment most
of the time

Procedures are listed in clear steps

Each step is numbered and in a
complete sentence
Diagrams are included to describe
the set-up
Accurate representation of the data
using tables and/or graphs
Graphs and tables are labeled and
titled
Data is precise with less than 5%
difference with accepted values
Trends / patterns are logically
analyzed
Questions are answered thoroughly
and in complete sentences
Analysis is insightful
Accurate statement of the results of
lab indicates whether results support
hypothesis
Possible sources of error and what
was learned from the lab discussed

Data

Analysis /
Result

Discussion

Data is not represented or is

not accurate

Trends / patterns are not

analyzed
Questions are not answered
Analysis is not relevant
No disussion was included or
shows little effort and reflection
on the lab

Participation
(during
experiment)

Student was hostile about

participating

Participation was minimal

Interview (for
short reports)

Student cannot answer

questions about the experiment

Student can answer some

questions about the experiment

NAME OF LECTURER :

Student can answer questions

about the experiment and
begins to make connections
between the experiment and its
applications

Student can explain the results

of the experiment in detail and
the ways in which they relate to
the research focus

SIGNATURE :

DATE :

TOTAL SCORE :

Note : SCR = SCORE, WT = WEIGHTAGE, TSCR = TOTAL SCORE