Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E
RECTILE dysfunction is defined as the inabil-
erection and detumescence. The somatic component,
ity to achieve and maintain an erection suffi-
the pudendal nerve, is responsible for penile sensa-
cient to permit satisfactory sexual intercourse.1
tion and the contraction and relaxation of the extra-
It has been estimated to affect 20 million to 30 mil-
corporeal striated muscles (bulbocavernous and is-
lion men in the United States.2,3 It may result from
chiocavernous).
psychological, neurologic, hormonal, arterial, or cav-
ernosal impairment or from a combination of these Penile Flaccidity
factors. In this article we provide a brief overview of
The maintenance of the intracorporeal smooth
the physiology of erection and the pathophysiology
muscle in a semicontracted state (Fig. 2) results from
of erectile dysfunction, followed by a discussion of
three factors: intrinsic myogenic activity,7 adrenergic
drug treatment for the disorder.
neurotransmission,8 and endothelium-derived con-
PHYSIOLOGY OF PENILE ERECTION tracting factors such as prostaglandin F2a and endo-
thelins.9,10
Penile erection is a neurovascular event modulated
by psychological factors and hormonal status. On Penile Erection
sexual stimulation, nerve impulses cause the release of
Nitric oxide released during nonadrenergic, non-
neurotransmitters from the cavernous nerve termi-
cholinergic neurotransmission and from the endothe-
nals and of relaxing factors from the endothelial cells
lium is probably the principal neurotransmitter me-
in the penis, resulting in the relaxation of smooth
diating penile erection.11,12 Within the muscle, nitric
muscle in the arteries and arterioles supplying the
oxide activates a soluble guanylyl cyclase, which rais-
erectile tissue and a severalfold increase in penile
es the intracellular concentration of cyclic guanosine
blood flow. At the same time, relaxation of the tra-
monophosphate (GMP). Cyclic GMP in turn activates
becular smooth muscle increases the compliance of
a specific protein kinase, which phosphorylates cer-
the sinusoids, facilitating rapid filling and expansion
tain proteins and ion channels, resulting in the open-
of the sinusoidal system (Fig. 1). The subtunical venu-
ing of potassium channels and hyperpolarization of
lar plexuses are thus compressed between the trabec-
the muscle-cell membrane, sequestration of intracel-
ulae and the tunica albuginea, resulting in almost to-
lular calcium by the endoplasmic reticulum, and block-
tal occlusion of venous outflow.4,5 These events trap
ing of calcium influx by the inhibition of calcium
the blood within the corpora cavernosa and raise the
channels. The consequence is a drop in cytosolic cal-
penis from a dependent position to an erect position,
cium concentrations and relaxation of the smooth
with an intracavernous pressure of approximately 100
muscle (Fig. 3). During the return to the flaccid state,
mm Hg (the phase of full erection).
cyclic GMP is hydrolyzed to GMP by phosphodies-
During masturbation or sexual intercourse, both
terase type 5. Other phosphodiesterases are also found
of which trigger the bulbocavernous reflex, the is-
in the corpus cavernosum, but they do not appear to
chiocavernous muscles forcefully compress the base
have an important role in erection. Communication
of the blood-filled corpora cavernosa and the penis
among smooth-muscle cells takes place through gap
becomes even harder, with an intracavernous pressure
junctions in the membranes of adjacent cells, which
reaching several hundred millimeters of mercury (the
allow the passage of ions and second messengers to
phase of rigid erection). During this phase, the inflow
synchronize muscle activity.13
and outflow of blood temporarily cease.6 Detumes-
cence can be the result of a cessation of neurotrans- PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF ERECTILE
DYSFUNCTION
From the University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco. Erectile dysfunction can be classified as psychogen-
Address reprint requests to Dr. Lue at the Department of Urology, U-575, ic, organic (neurogenic, hormonal, arterial, cavernos-
University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0738, or at tlue@urol.
ucsf.edu. al, or drug-induced), or mixed psychogenic and or-
©2000, Massachusetts Medical Society. ganic (Table 1). The last form is the most common.
1802 · Ju ne 15 , 2 0 0 0
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
DRUG THERAPY
Prostate
Cavernous nerve
(autonomic)
Deep dorsal vein
Dorsal artery Dorsal nerve
(somatic)
Dorsal artery
Dorsal nerve
(somatic) Erect
Circumflex
artery
Circumflex Sinusoidal
vein spaces
Flaccid
Helicine arteries
Deep dorsal vein
Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction prove libido but lead to difficulties with erection, or-
Common causes of psychogenic erectile dysfunc- gasm, and sexual satisfaction.16
tion include performance anxiety, a strained relation-
Neurogenic Erectile Dysfunction
ship, lack of sexual arousability, and overt psychiatric
disorders such as depression and schizophrenia. The Neurologic disorders such as Parkinson’s disease,
strong association between depression and erectile Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, and cerebral trauma often
dysfunction has been confirmed in two recent stud- cause erectile dysfunction by decreasing libido or pre-
ies.14,15 In men with schizophrenia, decreased libido venting the initiation of an erection. In men with spi-
is the main problem reported; neuroleptic drugs im- nal cord injuries, the degree of erectile function de-
Vo l u m e 3 4 2 Nu m b e r 2 4 · 1803
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The Ne w E n g l a nd Jo u r n a l o f Me d ic i ne
Protein Protein
kinase C Increased kinase C Decreased Endothelins
Increased
Adrenergic inositol cAMP
Smooth- inositol
triphosphate triphosphate
muscle cell Endothelial
Norepinephrine cell Prostaglandin F
G protein a2
a1 Ca2+
Effector – Myosin light- Ca2+–
(phospholipase C) Endoplasmic calmodulin chain kinase Endoplasmic calmodulin
reticulum reticulum
Inactive
Diacylglycerol Receptors Adenylyl
cyclase
Ca2+–calmodulin–myosin Ca2+–calmo
light-chain kinase complex light-chain ki
Protein Active
kinase C Increased Endothelins
Decreased
Myosin light-chain Myosin l
inositol cAMP
phosphorylation phosph
triphosphate
Increased Increased
Ca2+ Ca2+ Ca2+ Ca2+
Cycling of myosin Prostaglandin F2a o
Cycling
cross-bridges along actin Stimulation
cross-bridge
Ca2+– Myosin light- Inhibition
Endoplasmic calmodulin chain kinase
reticulum
Smooth-muscle
Inactive
contraction
Ca2+–calmodulin–myosin
light-chain kinase complex
Active
COLOR FIGURE
Myosin light-chain
Rev 2 5/12/2000 phosphorylation
Author Lue Increased
Fig # 2 2+
Ca Size 38p4 Ca2+
Title Cycling of myosin
ME cross-bridges along actin Stimulation
DE RDU
Artist SEW Inhibition
1804 · Ju ne 15 , 2 0 0 0
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
DRUG THERAPY
Cavernous nerve
Adrenergic
Smooth-
muscle cell
Cholinergic
Endothelial
cell Acetylcholine
Forskolin
Prostaglandin E1
Increased
inositol
triphosphate Receptors
G protein
Ca2+ Adenylyl
cyclase
L-Arginine cAMP
O2 PDE 2, 3, 4
eNOS ATP
5’ AMP
Papaverine
cAMP-
Endoplasmic specific protein
Cavernous reticulum kinase
nerve
Ca2+
K+ Ca2+
Decreased
Ca2+
Myosin
Nitric head detaches
oxide cGMP- from actin
specific protein
kinase
Nonadrenergic,
noncholinergic
Smooth-
K+ muscle
Guanylyl relaxation
cyclase
cGMP
PDE 5
GTP
5’ GMP
Ca2+
Sildenafil Stimulation
Papaverine
Zaprinast Inhibition
Vo l u m e 3 4 2 Nu m b e r 2 4 · 1805
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The Ne w E n g l a nd Jo u r n a l o f Me d ic i ne
1806 · Ju ne 15 , 2 0 0 0
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
DRUG THERAPY
Vo l u m e 3 4 2 Nu m b e r 2 4 · 1807
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The Ne w E n g l a nd Jo u r n a l o f Me d ic i ne
1808 · Ju ne 15 , 2 0 0 0
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
DRUG THERAPY
dermatitis. Because it stimulates growth of the pros- with placebo.35-37 However, sildenafil had little effect
tate, androgen therapy is contraindicated in men with on libido.
prostate cancer or obstruction of the bladder neck Among more than 3700 men with 1631 patient-
caused by prostatic hypertrophy. In men receiving years of exposure to sildenafil, most adverse events
long-term testosterone therapy, the hematocrit and were mild to moderate and self-limited in dura-
serum testosterone, lipids, and prostate-specific anti- tion.37 Among men taking 25 to 100 mg of sildena-
gen should be measured every six months. fil, 16 percent reported headache, 10 percent flushing,
7 percent dyspepsia, 4 percent nasal congestion, and
Sildenafil 3 percent abnormal vision (described as a mild and
Sildenafil is a selective inhibitor of phosphodies- transient color tinge or increased sensitivity to light).
terase type 5, which inactivates cyclic GMP. Since its These rates were twice as high among men taking
release in March 1998, it has become the drug of 100 mg of sildenafil as among men who were taking
choice for most men with erectile dysfunction. When lower doses. The visual effect is probably related to
sexual stimulation releases nitric oxide into the pe- inhibition of phosphodiesterase type 6 in the retina.
nile smooth muscle, inhibition of phosphodiesterase No chronic visual impairment has been reported,
type 5 by sildenafil causes a marked elevation of cy- and the incidence of visual side effects was similar in
clic GMP concentrations in the glans penis, corpus diabetic and nondiabetic men.38 Nevertheless, be-
cavernosum, and corpus spongiosum, resulting in in- cause of the short duration of the clinical trials and
creased smooth-muscle relaxation and better erection. the difficulty in detecting subtle retinal changes, the
Sildenafil has no effect on the penis in the absence long-term safety of sildenafil treatment is still un-
of sexual stimulation, when the concentrations of ni- known. In men with retinal diseases, an ophthalmo-
tric oxide and cyclic GMP are low. logic consultation may be warranted before sildenafil
Sildenafil has been evaluated in 21 clinical trials of treatment is initiated.
up to six months’ duration in over 3000 men and in Adverse cardiovascular events (nasal congestion,
10 open-label extension studies. In most of the men headache, and flushing) were mild and transient in
in these studies, erectile dysfunction was caused by or- the majority of men. The rate of serious cardiovas-
ganic or combined organic and psychogenic factors. cular events (angina and coronary-artery disorder) was
The results were based mainly on the reports of the 4.1 per 100 man-years of treatment among those
men (and sometimes the partners) and scores on the taking sildenafil and 5.7 per 100 man-years for those
International Index of Erectile Function. This index taking placebo. The rates of myocardial infarction
is a validated questionnaire with five domains: erec- were 1.7 and 1.4 per 100 man-years for the sildenafil
tile function (six questions), orgasmic function (two and placebo groups, respectively.37 However, because
questions), sexual desire (two questions), satisfaction most of the studies excluded men taking nitrates and
with intercourse (three questions), and overall sexu- those with concomitant medical conditions, the inci-
al satisfaction (two questions).34 In these studies, the dence of serious cardiovascular events could be expect-
number of erections and the rates of penile rigidity ed to be higher in the general population. From late
(Table 4), orgasmic function, and overall sexual sat- March to mid-November 1998, more than 6 million
isfaction were significantly higher with sildenafil than outpatient prescriptions of sildenafil were dispensed
percentage of patients
Improved erection
Placebo 10 12 15 26 18
Sildenafil 57 83 43 84 76
Successful intercourse
Placebo 12 13 NA 29 Not measured
Sildenafil 48 59 26 (at 0–6 mo), 70 Not measured
60 (at 18–24 mo)†
*Most data are from the sildenafil package insert (Viagra, Pfizer, New York, 1998). The dose is 50 to 100 mg. NA
denotes not applicable.
†The data are from a non–placebo-controlled trial.35 The rate of satisfaction with treatment was higher in men who
underwent bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy.
Vo l u m e 3 4 2 Nu m b e r 2 4 · 1809
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The Ne w E n g l a nd Jo u r n a l o f Me d ic i ne
1810 · Ju ne 15 , 2 0 0 0
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
DRUG THERAPY
Vo l u m e 3 4 2 Nu m b e r 2 4 · 1811
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The Ne w E n g l a nd Jo u r n a l o f Me d ic i ne
cent). The combination is available in several Euro- Dr. Lue has received grants from Pfizer, Tap, and Vivus and has served
as a consultant to Osbon, Pentech, Pfizer, Roche, Syntex, Tap, Upjohn, and
pean countries, but not in the United States. Vivus.
1812 · Ju ne 15 , 2 0 0 0
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
DRUG THERAPY
finger sensory thresholds in young, aging, and diabetic males. Arch Sex Be- with erectile dysfunction with transurethral alprostadil. N Engl J Med
hav 1989;18:1-12. 1997;336:1-7.
28. Kaiser FE, Viosca SP, Morley JE, Mooradian AD, Davis SS, Korenman 51. Williams G, Abbou CC, Amar ET, et al. Efficacy and safety of trans-
SG. Impotence and aging: clinical and hormonal factors. J Am Geriatr Soc urethral alprostadil therapy in men with erectile dysfunction. Br J Urol
1988;36:511-9. 1998;81:889-94.
29. Nogues MA, Starkstein S, Davalos M, Berthier M, Leiguarda R, Gar- 52. Porst H. Transurethral alprostadil with MUSE (medicated urethral sys-
cia H. Cardiovascular reflexes and pudendal evoked responses in chronic tem for erection) vs intracavernous alprostadil — a comparative study in
haemodialysis patients. Funct Neurol 1991;6:359-65. 103 patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1997;9:187-92.
30. Lue T. Impotence: a patient’s goal-directed approach to treatment. 53. Werthman P, Rajfer J. MUSE therapy: preliminary clinical observa-
World J Urol 1990;8:67-74. tions. Urology 1997;50:809-11.
31. Schiavi RC, White D, Mandeli J, Levine AC. Effect of testosterone ad- 54. Lewis RW. Combined use of transurethral alprostadil and an adjust-
ministration on sexual behavior and mood in men with erectile dysfunc- able penile constriction band in men with erectile dysfunction: results from
tion. Arch Sex Behav 1997;26:231-41. a multicenter trial. J Urol 1998;159:Suppl:237. abstract.
32. Morales A, Johnston B, Heaton JW, Clark A. Oral androgens in the 55. Jeremy JY, Ballard SA, Naylor AM, Miller MA, Angelini GD. Effects
treatment of hypogonadal impotent men. J Urol 1994;152:1115-8. of sildenafil, a type-5 cGMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor, and papaverine
33. Arver S, Dobs AS, Meikle AW, Allen RP, Sanders SW, Mazer NA. Im- on cyclic GMP and cyclic AMP levels in the rabbit corpus cavernosum in
provement of sexual function in testosterone deficient men treated for vitro. Br J Urol 1997;79:958-63.
1 year with a permeation enhanced testosterone transdermal system. J Urol 56. Stief CG, Wetterauer U. Erectile responses to intracavernous papaver-
1996;155:1604-8. ine and phentolamine: comparison of single and combined delivery. J Urol
34. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH. Diag- 1988;140:1415-6.
nostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index 57. Fallon B. Intracavernous injection therapy for male erectile dysfunc-
of Erectile Function. Urology 1999;54:346-51. tion. Urol Clin North Am 1995;22:833-45.
35. Hong EK, Lepor H, McCullough AR. Time dependent patient satis- 58. Juenemann K, Alken P. Pharmacotherapy of erectile dysfunction: a re-
faction with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED) after nerve-sparing rad- view. Int J Impot Res 1989;1:71-93.
ical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Int J Impot Res 1999;11:Suppl 1: 59. Stackl W, Hasun R, Marberger M. Intracavernous injection of prosta-
S15-S22. glandin E1 in impotent men. J Urol 1988;140:66-8.
36. Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma-Nathan H, Rosen RC, Steers WD, Wicker 60. Lee LM, Stevenson RW, Szasz G. Prostaglandin E1 versus phentola-
PA. Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med mine/papaverine for the treatment of erectile impotence: a double-blind
1998;338:1397-404. [Erratum, N Engl J Med 1998;339:59.] comparison. J Urol 1989;141:549-50.
37. Morales A, Gingell C, Collins M, Wicker PA, Osterloh IH. Clinical 61. Linet OI, Neff LL. Intracavernous prostaglandin E1 in erectile dys-
safety of oral sildenafil citrate (VIAGRA) in the treatment of erectile dys- function. Clin Invest 1994;72:139-49.
function. Int J Impot Res 1998;10:69-73. 62. Porst H. The rationale for prostaglandin E1 in erectile failure: a survey
38. Price DE, Gingell JC, Gepi-Attee S, Wareham K, Yates P, Boolell M. of worldwide experience. J Urol 1996;155:802-15.
Sildenafil: study of a novel oral treatment for erectile dysfunction in diabet- 63. Chew KK, Stuckey BG, Earle CM, Dhaliwal SS, Keogh EJ. Penile fi-
ic men. Diabet Med 1998;15:821-5. brosis in intracavernosal prostaglandin E1 injection therapy for erectile dys-
39. Muller JE, Mittleman A, Maclure M, Sherwood JB, Tofler GH. Trig- function. Int J Impot Res 1997;9:225-9.
gering myocardial infarction by sexual activity: low absolute risk and pre- 64. Canale D, Giorgi PM, Lencioni R, Morelli G, Gasperi M, Macchia E.
vention by regular physical exertion. JAMA 1996;275:1405-9. Long-term intracavernous self-injection with prostaglandin E1 for the
40. Cheitlin MD, Hutter AM Jr, Brindis RG, et al. Use of sildenafil (Via- treatment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Androl 1996;19:28-32.
gra) in patients with cardiovascular disease. Circulation 1999;99:168-77. 65. Kiely EA, Bloom SR, Williams G. Penile response to intracavernosal
[Erratum, Circulation 1999;100:2389.] vasoactive intestinal polypeptide alone and in combination with other vas-
41. Ernst E, Pittler MH. Yohimbine for erectile dysfunction: a systematic oactive agents. Br J Urol 1989;64:191-4.
review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Urol 1998;159: 66. Dinsmore WW, Alderdice DK. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and
433-6. phentolamine mesylate administered by autoinjector in the treatment of pa-
42. Gwinup G. Oral phentolamine in nonspecific erectile insufficiency. tients with erectile dysfunction resistant to other intracavernosal agents. Br
Ann Intern Med 1988;109:162-3. J Urol 1998;81:437-40.
43. Zorgniotti AW. Experience with buccal phentolamine mesylate for im- 67. Zaher TF. Papaverine plus prostaglandin E1 versus prostaglandin E1
potence. Int J Impot Res 1994;6:37-41. alone for intracorporeal injection therapy. Int Urol Nephrol 1998;30:193-
44. Goldstein I, Vasomax Study Group. Efficacy and safety of oral phen- 6.
tolamine (Vasomax) for the treatment of minimal erectile dysfunction. 68. Mirone V, Imbimbo C, Fabrizio F, Longo N, Palmieri A. Ketanserin
J Urol 1998;159:Suppl:240. abstract. plus prostaglandin E1 (PGE-1) as intracavernosal therapy for patients with
45. Heaton JP, Morales A, Adams MA, Johnston B, el-Rashidy R. Recov- erectile dysfunction unresponsive to PGE-1 alone. Br J Urol 1996;77:736-9.
ery of erectile function by the oral administration of apomorphine. Urolo- 69. Meinhardt W, de la Fuente RB, Lycklama à Nijeholt AA, Vermeij P,
gy 1995;45:200-6. Zwartendijk J. Prostaglandin E1 with phentolamine for the treatment of
46. Padma-Nathan H, Fromm-Freeck S, Ruff DD, McMurray JG, Rosen erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1996;8:5-7.
RC, Apomorphine SL Study Group. Efficacy and safety of apomorphine 70. Bennett AH, Carpenter AJ, Barada JH. An improved vasoactive drug
SL vs placebo for male erectile dysfunction (MED). J Urol 1998;159: combination for a pharmacological erection program. J Urol 1991;146:
Suppl:241. abstract. 1564-5.
47. Lance R, Albo M, Costabile RA, Steers WD. Oral trazodone as em- 71. Weiss JN, Badlani GH, Ravalli R, Brettschneider N. Reasons for high
pirical therapy for erectile dysfunction: a retrospective review. Urology drop-out rate with self-injection therapy for impotence. Int J Impot Res
1995;46:117-20. 1994;6:171-4.
48. Montorsi F, Strambi LF, Guazzoni G, et al. Effect of yohimbine-tra- 72. Gupta R, Kirschen J, Barrow RC II, Eid JF. Predictors of success and
zodone on psychogenic impotence: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- risk factors for attrition in the use of intracavernous injection. J Urol 1997;
controlled study. Urology 1994;44:732-6. 157:1681-6.
49. Meinhardt W, Schmitz PI, Kropman RF, de la Fuente RB, Lycklama 73. Gomaa A, Shalaby M, Osman M, et al. Topical treatment of erectile
à Nijeholt AA, Zwartendijk J. Trazodone, a double blind trial for treatment dysfunction: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial of cream
of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1997;9:163-5. containing aminophylline, isosorbide dinitrate, and co-dergocrine mesylate.
50. Padma-Nathan H, Hellstrom WJG, Kaiser FE, et al. Treatment of men BMJ 1996;312:1512-5.
Vo l u m e 3 4 2 Nu m b e r 2 4 · 1813
Downloaded from www.nejm.org on June 13, 2010 . Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.