Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ERINC ERDEM
Final year PhD student, School of MACE, The University of Manchester
Introduction
In high speed flight traditional aerodynamic control surfaces are subjected to severe flight conditions and
loadings in different flight corridors. At high altitudes, these surfaces might not function properly due to low
density air and/or significant aerodynamic heating resulting from various flow interaction phenomena.
Transverse jet injection serves a strong alternative control method to overcome these problems and entirely
regulated by the fluid injection, which eliminates the need for actuators to deflect mechanical parts. However a
major drawback of this method is the complex three dimensional unsteady flowfield consisting of separated
regions, shock waves, shear layers and wakes, etc. In order to resolve this complex flow topology there is a
strong need for two/three dimensional measurement techniques such as Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) that
measures velocity vector field on a plane. Yet the application of PIV to high speed flows is not trivial; the need
for uniform seeding of solid nanoparticles, and the use of quick interframe time cameras, high power lasers
are mandatory for high quality experimental data. Current study aims at the investigation of the unsteady flow
topology resulting from a transverse sonic jet in Mach 5 cross flow over a flat surface using PIV and also
2
2
assesses the effect of injectant gas at a very similar momentum flux ratio, J, (=jetpjetM jet/ pM ).
Results
The incoming freestream flow is at Mach 5 with a freestream velocity, pressure and temperature of 790m/s,
1220Pa and 62.5K respectively. Incoming Reynolds number per unit length is 13.2x106 1/m. The jet is
regulated to give a jet to freestream momentum flux ratio, J, of around 2.7 for all gases.
Figure 2 Three instantaneous raw PIV images with 3 gases (top: Air, middle: C02 and bottom: Helium)
Fig.2
2 above shows instantaneous raw PIV images at mach 5 cross flow signifying the difference in penetration
characteristics. From extensive research J is found to be the only gove
governing
rning parameter for jet penetration that
includes specific heat ratio, , of the gas. However the penetration trajectory and jet to freestream mixing are
clearly affected by type of the gas in both nearfield and farfield. In the nearfield air and CO2 (despite being
heavier than air) jets behaves
ehaves similar in terms of first expansion of the jet, however
how
Helium expands little,
carries on vertical for about 3 jet diameter and then ben
bends towards the main stream. In terms of farfield Helium
mixes minimal compared to others.
others CO2 jet propagates closer to wall than air jet due to its heaviness.
heaviness
Following Fig.3 shows velocity magnitude contours of the average of 100 instantaneous uncorrelated vector
fields with 3 gases captured during 7.5 seconds of the useful running time of HSST. Jet is situtated between 2
and 3 in x direction and y=0 specifies the wall. Air jet shows medium
dium penetration path and expands
substantially in farfield with blurred upper and lower bounds, whereas Co2 jet has quite distinct jet boundaries
and convects closer to wall. On the other hand Helium jet bends smoothly and convects far from the wall. All
the jets reach around 700m/s downstream where they are carried by the main flow behind the jet induced bow
shock wave.
Figure 3 Averaged vector fields over 100 instantaneous samples with 3 gases (left:: Air, middle: C02 and right: Helium)
Figure 4 Turbulence intensity with 3 gases (left: Air, middle: C02 and right:: Helium
Helium)
As a conclusion, air CO2 and Helium jets in high speed cross flow have quite different characteristics in terms
of penetration path, turbulence levels and mixing even though they have the same momentum flux ratio, a
parameter governing jet penetration. Especially Helium has a very distinct behavior at near field mixing. PIV
investigation of these types of flows
flow is carried out first time in literature.