Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Post-Tensioned Concrete
Box Girder Bridges and
Retrofit Procedures
these factors.
Cracking in post-tensioned concrete
box girders generally results, in a broad
sense, for the following reasons: inadequate flexural and shear capacity, nonconsideration of thermal stresses, insufficient attention to stresses developed
by curvature of tendons, improper or inappropriate construction techniques,
lack of quality workmanship to meet the
tolerances necessary for problem free
structures, and understrength materials.
It should also be noted that cracks are
not totally avoidable in post-tensioned
concrete box girder bridges, since not all
portions of the structure are precompressed in three directions and local
concrete shrinkage is not always controllable. Certain cracks may not be
structurally serious, while others are. It
FLEXURAL CRACKING
Flexural cracking is associated with
tensile stresses that exceed the tensile
capacity of concrete. They are generally
found, in continuous girders, at the bottom of the girder in positive moment
areas and at the top of the girder in
negative moment areas (Fig. 1). In box
girders, positive moment flexure cracks
will traverse the bottom flange (soffit)
width and if severe enough will propaPCI JOURNAL/March-April 1985
Synopsis
The appearance of distress in
the form of cracking in any concrete structure is one of concern
and consternation to all parties involved. It is evidence of an unf avorable stress condition and if serious enough could affect the structure's integrity. Cracking may occur
for a number of reasons but usually
is the result of the interaction of
several causative factors. These
factors taken individually may be
minor but when superimposed can
result in distress.
This paper presents documentation of problems that have led to
cracking in post-tensioned concrete box girder bridges in Europe
as well as in the United States. 1t
discusses cracking resulting from
inadequate flexural and shear
capacity, thermal stress cracking,
and cracking resulting from tendon
curvature and tendon misalignment. Also discussed are possible
retrofit measures.
The intent of this paper is to
bring these problems to the attention of the engineering and construction professions with the hope
of precluding their recurrence.
^^K^PATTERN
inflection
points
MOMENT DIAGRAM
+M
combined
bending-shear
Cracks
near support
vertical
bending
cracks
f
'
continuity tendons
cantilever tendons
joint(i)
sections at right
and left checked
unchecked zone
where cracking
develops
joint(i*I)
sections at right
and left chocked
85
point of
infI -tinn
la!
faulting
(b)
Fig, 5. Shear cracking.
fX
longitudinal
stresses
SHEAR CRACKING
Shear cracks occur in the webs and are
perceptibly inclined at approximately a
45 deg angle. They normally manifest
themselves in a zone between the support and an inflection point (Fig. 5a).
The web reinforcement traversing these
cracks is subject to stress variations
which can cause bond failure and
fatigue damage. In addition, at the limit,
the reinforcement can yield. This may
result in the faulting of the intrados
which is usually not visible to the eye
(Fig. 5b), but can be instrumentally
measured.
Most of the causes of flexural cracks
are also responsible for shear cracks
since a change in bending moment automatically changes shear stress:'
1. Insufficient prestressing
2. Excess permanent loads
3. Secondary stresses
4. Thermal effects
Shear cracks can also be initiated by
bending cracks or high tensile stresses
behind tendon anchorages. The following design oversights may also contribute to the formation of shear cracks:
PCI JOURNALJMarch-April 1985
1. Lack of recognition of shear distribution in the webs of multicell girders. The transverse design of the section does not take into account the true
flexibility of the cross section. (This effect will be discussed in a subsequent
section.)
2. Lack of double checking to the right
and left of a section where a tendon terminates.
3. Failure to recognize the effect of inclination of continuity tendons in variable depth girders. Although the vertical
component of a single tendon may be
small, if there are a large number of tendons they can create a significant shear
force.
The total net shear force, V, is the
sum of the following terms (Fig. 6):3
1. Shear force due to applied loads
equals V,
2. Reduction due to verticaI component of draped tendons, where used
equals E P sin a.
3. Increase due to inclination of continuity tendons in the bottom flange for
variable depth girders equals +1 P sin
Is.
intermediate diaphragm
PARTIAL ELEVATION
Fig, 7. Web cracking of center web.
60
40
20
4HH
90
web
distribution of
shear stress
in web
R \v
1
I )
V ^
(b)
(c)
(d)
THERMAL STRESS
CRACKING
The current AASHTO Specifications
recognize thermal expansion and contraction in the design of bridge structures. The rise and fall of temperature
should be determined for the site of the
structure under consideration. In general, AASHTO requirements for ternPCI JOURNALI March-April 1985
Rise
Fall
30F
(16.7C)
35F
(19.4C)
40F
(22.2C)
45F
(25.0C)
e=aIAt
(1)
where
e = total change in length I
a = thermal coefficient of
expansion (or contraction)
l = length of a member from a
reference point
A t = change in temperature of an
91
unrestrained member
The change in length of an unrestrained member can be determined.
Where a member is restrained (fixity of
supports or friction in bearings) the
thermal expansion or contraction is prevented by reactions at the supports
which then cause stresses in the member. This stress is calculated by assuming that the thermal expansion or contraction first occurs and then forces
(reactions) are applied at the restraints
to bring the member hack to its original
length.
(3)
@ webs
girder depth
support
reaction 2V it
`4 t
aphrag g
compressi(
tension
reaction
2Vult
jdiaphragm
//I
^ N
web
d/2 T whichever
the largest area
produces
L
(d) PLAN OF DIAPHRAGM/ WEB REGION
Fig. 12. Indirect bearing support.
92
(2)
(4)
ambient temperature
sun
---`-wind speed A.
re-radiation doorio ^/
}
}
7 qi
asphalt
\]/
cate:iai
properties
--+-
wind speed
ambient temperature
Fig. 13. Thermal response parameters.
FREE DEFORMATION
tP
P_ = PL1
RESTRAINT FORCES AND MOMENTS
Fig. 14. Moment caused by thermal
gradient.
recommendations for their consideration in design. Most of these recommendations require different shaped
gradients and intensities to be evaluated
(Fig. 15). However, it should be noted
that they are influenced by local
meteorology and construction practices.
The New Zealand gradient" (Fig.
15a) is a fifth power parabola for a depth
of 1200 mm (48 in.) with the temperature (T) at the concrete surface related to
an asphalt thickness (d) in mm. This
curve is used for webs and that portion
of the deck not above an enclosed cell,
i.e., deck flange cantilevers.
For decks above an enclosed cell a
linear curve is used of 5 0.054C per
100 nun (4 in.) thickness with the temperature (1') at the top surface. A linear
temperature increase from 0C to 1.5C
is used over the bottom 200 mm (8 in.)
thickness of the section.
For structures shallower than 1400
mm (56 in.) the two parts of the solid
curve are to be superimposed. For box
girders the transverse effects are obtained by using the dotted curve. On a
bridge which is to be surfaced, the temporary unsurfaced condition is to be
checked by using a value for(T) of27C.
Thermal gradient curves used in England 15 are indicated in Fig. 15b for deck
warming and deck cooling. These
94
T
concrete deck surface 1
100 mm
''' tY
' (deck above
webs
, enclo sad Cell
deck nol above
enclosed cell
iy
ii
(a) NEW ZEALAND
ty T(y3 1200)5
Yy -
T- 32-0.2d*C
.Drat
v
1.5
Tt
Tt
hi
__I
h2
T2
T1
oC
zz 0.2 e.5
0.4 12.0
0.6 13.0
ar 0.8 13.6
T2
- u1
3.5 05
3.0
1.5
3.0
2.0
3.0 2.5
h4
0.2
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.5
T2
2.0
6.5
7.6
8.0
0.5
1.4
1,8
1.7
1.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.0
1.5
3.5
5.0
6.0
6.3
6.5
4.5
6.4
(deck cooling)
24
n_
h3
T4
0.4
(deck warming)
T3
h
m
Ill
h2
1
4 02h0.25 m
h 2 `h3 -0.25h^0 .2 m
1e
hi
72
h1.0.3hz6 0.15 m
h2.0.3h 8 0.10 m
50.25 m
h '. 0.3h^ (0.1 mtsurlacinp
depth In meters)
(tor thin slabs. h 3 hmlled
13 by h-hl-h27
(b) ENGLAND
5-0,05d0C
10G ar Soc
^Il
^
goC
h
(c) AUSTRALIA
(d) FRANCE
95
300
^^`
C2 /h=0.65
range
E 'y-
250
^
n
200
C2/h0=0.60
i
220 50 psi
oa
f2 Ec (t T)C2Jh0
a
rn
W
150
160 Si
cons ant de rth
.. a
tl7 N
for constant
depth and inertia
a -coefficient of
thermal expansion
oT+tamp erature
gradient
NOTE: For other modulii
100
Ec = 5,000,000 psi
1.0
h1
1.5
2.5
2.0
of elasticity mutttply
stress by E/5,000,000
3.0 h11h0
h1
T" 18F
^'
r0LEi
f2
ELEVATION OF SPAN
SECTION AT CENTER
crack
crack
b!2
/
n
N
cracks
Plan
(a) CRACKS IN THIN BOTTOM FLANGE
top flange
web
2nd stage casting
forms still in place
bottom flange
ELEVATION
SECTION
segment A
segment B
(a) ELEVATION
cons,
As an example of temperature variation in a box girder bridge, data extracted from Ref. 17 is presented here to
illustrate the point. The research effort
involved the instrumentation and temperature data collection in two adjacent
segments near the midspan of an interior span (Fig. 19a) during construction of
the Klement Gottwald Bridge over the
Nusle Valley in Prague, Czechoslovakia.
Segment A had been previously cast and
Segment B is the segment being constructed, Segment length is 11.5 ft (3.5
m) and is cast in three stages as indicated in Fig. 19h.
Concrete temperature data obtained
in December 1969 was influenced by
the following factors:
1. Extremely cold ambient temperature. The temperature was below 0C
and in the final phases of data collection
the temperature was often below 20C.
2. Preheating of the concrete mix, because of the low ambient temperature.
Hot water was used in preparing the mix
such that the average mix temperature at
98
1
y
1
0 1
10
20
5
1
(a) STAGE 1
20
1^
30
^.
10
20 - 15
30
25
point
35
10
30
25 ..
2015
10
20
(b) STAGE 2
----------
point "c"
1 30 20
30_ipoint "b"
40 - 50
i0'/\
0
,.
20
(c) STAGE 3
-7.5
-10
all values are in 0C
T oC
60
.56.0
c
r
50
40
30
X28-0
20
10
20 40 60
-1 0
-20
'b'
0 10
20 140
-- _
t (hours)
- 8.4
-16.6_
These curves are also noticeably influenced by the low temperature of the
previously cast Segment A and the cool
ambient temperature. The maximum
temperature gradient decreases gradually after the first few hours of hydration
heat development. This gradual decrease in gradient is due initially to the
heating up of the adjacent segment and
later on to decrease in heat of hydration
and cooling of the web of the segment.
Thin members cool at a faster rate
than thicker members which, therefore,
create considerable tensile stress. When
fresh concrete is cast against old concrete there is a potential for cracking in
the younger concrete which, when subsequent cooling occurs, is hampered
from shortening by the older concrete.
This usually occurs during the first few
cool evenings when the strength of concrete is low and low tensile stresses can
cause cracking. At this point, because
bond is not sufficiently developed,
reinforcement cannot prevent opening
of the cracks. Restraint forces due to
temperature differences must be
minimized to the extent possible by
avoiding large differences in thickness
ie
segment A segment B
T C
60
50
joint
time in hours
from placing
of concrete
24
--12
49
67
40
30
20
10
0
91
115
0.5
I
1.0
20 m
external
heating
these cracks, which can cause a deviation of the isostatic lines of compression
toward the uncracked zones, altering the
prestressing distribution in the section
under consideration resulting in insufficient bearing strength.
To avoid this situation the members
being joined must be rigidly held in position. Normally, in cast-in-place balanced cantilever construction a form
traveler is used to clamp the two cantilever tips rigidly in place. For precast
segments or for longitudinal closure
pours between flange tips an external
rigid clamping device must he
employed (strongbacks). In addition,
proper curing procedures must be
employed to control shrinkage stresses.
Another difficulty during curing is
that resulting from large temperature
differences between the curing environment of the segment being cast and
the outside environment of the castagainst segment (Fig. 25). If a temperature gradient exists across the eastagainst segment, its shape will change.
The segment will return to its original
shape when the temperature gradient
falls back to zero,
101
T o f Ow
212
uj z
W
cca
^
rt
0Gr1
^o^^ZG max. temp. <150F(65C)
G3
65
FORM STRIPPING
65
time in hours
2 to 3hI
zp
~)W
?Ud
ut
F
<<
aw
w
-J
0
0
w
OM
2i
w
I
cracks
detachments
PLAN
closure pour
flange movements
SECTION
closure segment
movements
Fig. 24. Closure pour cracks.
102
-il" fit`
ft1fr
<h "
segment
tr
conjugate
t
end form
gradient in
conjugat
curingAT F
tempera
re
`
y' '
1f
ambient
temperature
%"^^' mot'
en t
L
Fig. 25. Effect of improper curing of segments in short -line casting.
CRACKING AT OR NEAR
ANCHORAGES
Certain anchorage positions, such as
an anchorage blister on a thin flange as
shown in Fig. 26, should be avoided.
Wherever possible, anchorage blisters
for continuity tendons should be placed
in a fillet between the web and flange
where the transverse section has the
largest rigidity. If this type of detail can103
anchorage
segment joint
web
anchorage
blister
>tendons
-i
cracks vweb
iF J
anchorage
'blister
cracking
in joint,
web
segmen
joints
104
tendons
-web
so^
105
top tendon
riange crack
bottom tendon
flanne cranks
ack
initial load
490 k/tendon
iq
top tendon
-^
average
' I
throwg
h crack in
compression
both webs
I
520 psi
stress
380 psi
initial load 490 kltendon
7
i i
1 1 i 4
'
PARTIAL LONGITUDINAL SECTION
diagonal tension
due to prestress
distribution in web
,
,
II
diagonal crack
II
t i
141a
bottom
tendon
I '
' I
pier
II
TRUSS ANALOGY
SECTION A-A
t^
tension
'\l l l^^
I\\tension
compression
Fig. 33. Stress pattern at anchorage.
1 0
n 0
corner crack
0) Q / 0
Oj
longitudinal tendons
f4^;E
1i i.^.
PARTIAL CROSS-SECTION
unit load N/R
t
^^r
Pt
effect of
compressive
Stresses
109
PULLOUT OF
HORIZONTALLY CURVED
TENDONS
A problem has occurred relatively recently with small radius horizontally
curved, post-tensioned box girder
bridges. The problem has occurred at
two known sites during construction. It
concerns the lateral force produced in
the webs by the tensioning of horizontally curved longitudinal tendons.
The first example* is a continuous,
cast-in-place, post-tensioned concrete
box girder bridge, with three spans of
176, 234, and 176 ft (53.6, 71.3, and 53.6
m) with slightly over half of the eastern
176 ft (53.6 m) span aligned on a horizontal curve with a 250 ft (76 m) radius
(Fig. 37). This 176 ft (53.6 m) curved
span has three 12 in. (0.305 in) thick intermediate diaphragms, located at each
quarter point of the span.
In cross section (Fig. 38) the
superstructure is a two-cell box with top
flange width of 34 ft (10.4 m), a bottom
flange width of 23 ft (7 m), and a depth of
"Las Lomas Bridge Causes of Structural Failure," Report to Department of the Anny, San
Francisco District Corps of Engineers, T. Y. Lin
International, August 1979 (Unpublished).
234'
176'
176`
Lam;
r^
14
1
23'
111
Abt. 1
tI
Pier 2
N11
^urv'^d Span
=s=y r^
^V ^'^^`
Partial Plan
location of failures
section
Fig. 40. Zones of web failure.
112
sharp
angle
change
tension }
1
large radial
tearing force
portion
{ { r
L/
tension
distributed
radial
force
After that, most of the tendons were released except two tendons along the
north web and one tendon along the
center web which were not released.
It should be pointed out that a review
of the construction documents and the
construction method for both structure;
revealed no serious discrepancies between the construction method as compared to the construction documents
and specifications. Further, the
AASHTO Standard Specifications for
Highway Bridges' does not provide
guidance for the design of curved
post-tensioned box girders.
In both these structures, there was a
combination of relatively sharp curvature, thin concrete cover over the tendons and the bundling of a number of
large sized tendons close together.
These failures are somewhat unique in
that the problem would not have surfaced in the case of a flatter curvature,
thicker concrete cover over the tendons,
or adequate spreading of the tendons
into individual ducts as compared to
bundled ducts.
The analysis of the failure of these
structures can be divided into three
separate actions (Fig. 45) which need to
he considered in design:
1. The global or overall girder action
of the bridge together with its supporting piers and abutments.
2. Regional beam action of each web
113
la
-I!
\ rio.,
^m
W)
/^
/4
N
a^
C
0 ^
DC
D
CD
Cal
li
EA
Cr
ICA
ID
36'IO C
9
23'
yv
LI
B!
4.
_c1
^
^%
g.
y^^4
111
I,
11
hairline cracks
large cracks
Spa us
Fig. 43. Failure of south web.
Girder Action
GLOBAL
1
REGIONAL ^
Beam Action
1
1
LOCAL
1
1
^^/
Slab Action
Top Flange
/\
ttom Flange
Web Spanning
Vertically
radial
force
from
tendons
distributed
radial
force
from
arch
r action
--
distributed force
from arch
compression
concentrated force
from tendons
System
tendon force
arch
action
total
117
32^
12
fZ "/Ar ^_ 3.39
hL
O.f7 %T.
_3K
o.ra4
o0
a.)1K/sr
a^'yFr
r.la9
32^Fr
2 span loading
^3,3gK
1 span loading
-I
IuIuiii!iIflhuuII
uiuiiuiiriuiiu
IIUI!iUii!!1
n
-=
8
F
12
14
118
16
18
20
F =
12
10
14
16
18
20
d^
ide of curve
dl
standard
detail
119
oufsrds of curve.
B "lolls
* 4 'L_^c /35 bend
of each stirrup. Hook around stirrup
le g s AI rernole sides for 135 hook.
Place one above top duct and one
below bottom duct.
Inside
of curve
Prestress
Duct -Stirrup
Legs---
` P
r a
,OOO
pQ
O
.
P a I.
P I
6 ,
"$edge"
(b) TENDON AT STRESSING LOAD
y
a r
9 , , '
ne w
(c) FAILURE
(a)
Q a
laminar crack
(b)
Fig. 55. Diaphragm cracking from tendon curvature.
In addition, a splitting crack may develop as a result of multi-strand compaction in the zone of curvature as discussed above. It appears that the laminar crack either by itself or in conjunction with the splitting crack, over a period of time will propagate to the surface
and produce spalling. Spalled areas of
the deck have been as large as 3 x 3 ft (1
x 1 m). The spalled surface in two projects were located generally over the
123
access opening
- `
longitudinal'tendons
cracks
web
Fig. 56. Cracking at an access opening.
cracks
S., r
(a)
laminar cra k
original
of to on
of tendon
C_
imprint
of duct
(b)
deformed /
reinforcement
delamination
position
of tendon
after failure
(c)
(d)
joint cracks or spalling
cracks
(e)
Fig. 57. Effects of misalignment of tendon ducts.
problem indicated that during construction the longitudinal tendons had been
deflected downward because of an interference with the deflected profile of
the transverse tendons.
The result of the upward components
of the two curved tendon systems probably created a laminar crack upon tensioning of the tendons. Air pressure
used to blow out the remaining unstressed tendon ducts probably propa125
t
OCR_
00
126
To avoid the problem of duct crushing, a number of alternatives are available to restrain the duct being tensioned
from displacing into and crushing an
adjacent ungrouted duct, namely,
maintaining a clearance of one duct diameter between ducts, use of prebent
steel tubes of adequate thickness in the
zone of curvature, or providing adequate
tie reinforcement.
Close spacing of longitudinal ducts
combined with transverse ducts and
longitudinal and transverse reinforcing
steel in the top and bottom of the flange
makes it very difficult to effectively
place concrete, Concrete does not always work around and under the ducts
and reinforcement. Workmen often
stand or walk in the fresh concrete. This
pushes the ducts and reinforcement
down and when the men have moved, it
springs back up, which may cause a
laminar separation in the concrete.
Apparently, vibration does not always
extend deep enough to force concrete
up between closely spaced ducts and
knit the top and bottom layers together.
Bleed water may collect under flat ducts
and in the "V" formed by two adjoining
longitudinal ducts. Much of the problem
can be alleviated by selection of tendon
size and duct spacing to maximize the
concrete area at mid-depth of the flange,
as discussed above.
Another form of cracking, spalling and
failure is associated with misplacement
of a curved tendon in a blister anchorage. The design assumes that the tendon
profile as it leaves the flange (or web)
and enters the anchorage blister is a
smooth curve (Fig. 59a) with a uniform
pressure along the curve. In reality, this
is seldom accomplished in construction.
The duct usually has an angular "kink"
instead of a smooth curve transition,
which produces a concentrated force at
the toe of the blister (Fig. 59b).
This then leads to a spalling or "popout" failure (Fig. 59c). The concrete area
in the slab forward of the blister is then
reduced, leading to a compression f'ail-
dSa^ Pre5sre
,yn;tosmt ra 1 t ` t ^
..
itt
concentrated force
^}
I^nuA
pop_out or
Spa
tension
failure
1j
ure at that location, tension failure behind the blister and shearing along the
longitudinal sides of the blister.
To avoid the "kink" in the duct, a
heavier gauge duct or prebent tube
should be used, tie confining reinforcement around the tendon should be extended well forward of the blister, adequate reinforcement extending from the
blister into the flange (or web) behind it
should be employed to cater to the tenPCI JOURNALJMarch-April 1985
sile forces behind the blister, and adequate transverse reinforcement should
be used to cater to shear forces alongside of the blister.
The design of blisters requires, in addition to reinforcement for anchorage
bursting stresses, adequate reinforcement for shear and bending between the
blister and the flange or web interface.
Consideration should be given to Sea
tions 11.7 and 11.9 of the ACI Building
127
straight tendon
draped tendon
deviation blocks
Fig. 60. Tendon profiles.
RETROFIT MEASURES
The purpose of retrofitting is to correct
a deficiency in a structure the result of
which has been manifested b y formation
of cracks. Thus, in order to propose a.
corrective measure, the source(s) of the
problem must be determined. As previously pointed out, cracking rarely results from a single cause but more likely
from a combination and interaction from
several sources. The analysis and investigation of the problem are frequently
difficult. Some of the phenomena exhibited are not well understood either in
qualitative or quantitative terms.
Therefore, the repair method can rarely
be presented in simple terms.
To further compound the problem, a
proposed repair must he analyzed with
respect to the structure as a whole to insure that a detrimental effect or adverse
stress condition is not produced at some
128
Flexural Cracks
In this situation the intent of the retrofit is to restore the integrity of the
girder by recompressing it where it has
decompressed and subsequently
cracked. There are two retrofit measures
that can be considered: support Ievel
adjustment or additional prestressing.'
Support level adjustment is simply a
method of prestressing whereby supports are jacked in such a manner as to
produce a moment that induces compressive stresses at the point where the
member has been decompressed. This
method is attractive because of its relative ease of implementation and low
cost. However, because the method is
one of forced displacement its effectiveness is short term as a result of subsequent moment redistribution.
As an example,' this method was used
on a 15 year old structure in France
PCI JOURNAL'March-April 1985
clamshell
11
web
deviation block
fastening pins
tubeI
steel
polyethylene
tube
steel deflector
fastening pins
bottom flange
(b) STEEL
(a) CONCRETE
c,nnl Frnw.._
bored hole
anchorage
anchorage
5
additional
1 external
tendon
existing
diaphragm
at diaphragms.
external
tendons
deviation buttress
1_ match-line
anchorage buttress
addonal tendons
match-line
deviation buttress /
Fig. 64. Additional prestressing retrofit.
local stresses (bending, shear, and tension in the web behind the boss) which
the existing structure may be incapable
of accepting. Another disadvantage is
the very short tendons used to pin the
boss to the web. These short tendons are
very sensitive to losses and could result
in the boss sliding which would, of
course, lead to unanticipated losses in
the longitudinal tendons. Therefore,
particular attention must be given to
the:'
1. Methodology to be followed to reduce losses through the improper fastening of anchorages during tensioning
operations.
2. Distribution of the anchoring force
along the entire length of the boss
(transfer of prestressing from the boss to
the structure).
3. Treatment of the surface of the
joint between the anchoring boss and
the structure, and the resulting coefficient of friction.
4. Value of the coefficient of friction
between the fastening mortar and the
boss, if it is made of steel, and
5. Ratio between the fastening force
and force created by the anchored tendons.
Where a polygonal tendon profile is
PCI JOURNALIMarch-April 1985
PARTIAL PLAN
SI
web
flange
SECTION A-A
Fig. 65. Retrofit deviation buttress.
Shear Cracks
Repair of shear cracks in the web of
the structure illustrated in Fig. 7 was accomplished by adding vertical prestress
LL.
suspender
Section 1-1
Fig. 67. Repair system.
thickened flange_...,rib
Section 1-1
Fig. 69. Repair system.
134
135
epoxy
Injected
crack
web thickening
+^5 re-bar
tendons
caulking
material
(a)
web
2"x4"x 1" steel plate
washer
5/8" bolt
horizontal bar
2-#5 re-bar
welded to plates
anchor
for bolts
welds
view A-A
(b)
Fig. 71. Retrofit of inclined external web.
dons.
(c) Curvature near anchorage
zones in thin webs.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
An attempt has been made in this
paper to document the current state-ofknowledge with regard to reasons for
cracking in post-tensioned concrete box
girder bridges. However, the reasons for
cracking are so varied, complex and interactive that it is impossible to present
a document that is all inclusive and authoritative. As with any type of construction with any material, problems
arise that require the attention of not
only the designer, but contractors and
subcontractors as well. No matter how
good the design, if the structure is not
properly constructed, there will be
problems. Conversely, no matter how
dilligent the contractor, if the design
details are poor, problems will result.
Obviously, if both the design and the
construction are poor, problems are
compounded.
Technological progress is only of
value if it is measured against both posPCI JOURNAIJMarch-April 1985
itive and negative experiences. However, there exists in our society a cantoes attitude toward dealing with unfavorable developments, errors, and damages which inhibits technological progress. Unfortunately, when a problem occurs the initial reaction is to seek out the
guilty. This then leads to the situation
whereby, under direction from the legal
profession, all parties concerned are advised not to discuss the problem because of potential liability and litigation.
This is to some extent understandable
since none of the parties involved desire
to jepoardize their rights or to incriminate themselves. The disadvantage is
that it may take years before the case is
resolved in the courts and in the meantime the public safety at large may be
jeopardized because the same errors or
problems are perpetuated in possibly
hundreds of additional projects. This
impasse requires resolution and cooper137
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The data presented in this paper has
been gathered from personal experience
and from numerous and varied
documented sources. Much of the material presented is not original. Although
acknowledgment of all the many sources
is not possible, full credit is given wherever the specific source can be identified.
Professor T. Y. Lin, T. Y. Lin International; Mr. Robert C. Cassano, California Department of Transportation; and
Mr. Clarence R. Yamamoto, Hawaii Departrnent of Transportation, for material
presented on the "Pullout of Horizontally Curved Tendons." In addition, the
assistance of Professor Ben C. Lerwick,
Jr. in obtaining several FIP documents
is appreciated.
REFERENCES
1. Technical Instructions for the Inspection
and Maintenance of Highway Structures,
Interim Document 32, Sub-document 2,
"Box Girder or Ribbed Panel Bridges,
and Similar Prestressed Concrete Structures," Department of Highways and
Highway Traffic, Ministry of Transportation (France), October 19, 1979.
2. Bouvy, J. J . , and Foxier, J., "Problems
Encountered in Segmental Bridges Influencing Precast Segmental Construction," FIP Proceedings, V. 3, 1982.
3. Podolny, W., Jr., and Muller, J. M., Construction and Design of Prestressed
Concrete Segmental Bridges, John Wiley &
Sons, New York, N.Y., 1982.
4. Moreau, P., and Virlogeux, M., "Lessons
From a Shear-Cracked Bridge," Eleventh Congress of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Vienna, September 1-5, 1980.
5. Leonhardt, F., and Lippoth, W., "Lessons From Damage to Prestressed Concrete Bridges," Beton- und Stahlbetonbau (Berlin), No- 10, October 1970.
6. Leonhardt, F., Koch, R., and Rostasy,
F. S., "Suspension Reinforcement for
Indirect Loading of Prestressed Concrete Beams: Test Report and Recommendations," Beton- and Stahlbetonbau (Berlin), No. 10, October 1971.
138
14. New Zealand Ministry of Works and Development, "Highway Bridge Design
Brief," CDP 701/D, Civil Division Publication, Wellington, New Zealand,
September 1978_
15. British Standard BS 5400, Steel, Concrete and Composite Bridges, Part 1
General Statement, 1978.
16. Precast Segmental Box Girder Manual,
139