Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14333776
CITATIONS
READS
114
521
4 authors, including:
Ralph Hertel
Christian Gerber
Lindenhofspital Bern
University of Zurich
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
We assessed the relative value of lag signs for the evaluation of rotator cuff rupture in
a prospective study of 100 consecutive painful shoulders with impingement syndrome,
stages 1 to 3. Lag signs were compared with the Jobe and lift-off signs. Three tests
were designed to assess the main components of the rotator cuff: the external rotation
lag sign (ERLS) for the supraspinatus and the infraspinatus tendons, the drop sign for
the infraspinatus, and the internal rotation lag sign flRLS) for the subscapularis tendon.
For assessment of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus the ERLS was less sensitive but
more specific than the Jobe sign. The drop sign was the least sensitive but was as
specific as the ERLS. Partial ruptures of the supraspinatus remained concealed to the
ERLS. For assessment of the subscapularis the IRLS was as specific but more sensitive
than the lift-off sign. Partial ruptures of the subscapularis tendon could be missed by the
lift-off sign but were detected by the IRLS. The magnitude of the lag correlated with the
size of the rupture for both the ERLSand the IRLS. Clinical testing for lag signs was
efficient, reproducible, and reliable. In patients with little or no restriction of motion it
enhanced the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in rotator cuff lesions. (.I SHOULDERELBOW
SURG 1996;5:307-13.)
The clinical diagnosis of rotator cuff rupture is
based on the history and physical examination.
Although large ruptures can be diagnosed with
confidence, small lesions affecting a single tendon
may remain concealed when standard physical
signs are considered. At present the most useful
test for rupture of the posterosuperior rotator cuff is
considered to be the Jobe sign,'* which assesses
the ability (i.e., strength) of the affected shoulder to
maintain the arm in a position of 90 ~ elevation in
internal rotation againt a force applied by the
examiner. False-positive results may occur because
From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Universi~/of Berne.
Dr. Lambert is supported by grants from AO Internationa), Davos,
Switzerland, The Wellington Foundation Fund, London, U.K.,
The St. Mary's Special Trustees Fund, London, U.K., The Ethicon
Foundation Fund at The Royal College of Surgeons of England,
London, U.K.
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received
from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the
subject of this artide.
Reprint requests: R. Hertel, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inselspital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Copyright 9 1996 by Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Board of Trustees.
1058-2746/96/$5.00 + 0 3211171631
pain may interfere with strength testing. For assessment of subscapularis function the lift-off sign, as
originally described, 2 is most useful, although incomplete ruptures may remain concealed. Positive
clinical diagnosis of a rotator cuff tear, its location,
and its size may therefore be difficult and imprecise.
We have assessed the value of three new signs,
which we decided to call the external rotation lag
sign, the drop sign, and the internal rotation lag
sign, designed to enhance our clinical diagnosis of
rotator cuff lesions. A concept of the assessment of
the malfunction of musculotendinous units at near
maximal contraction, leading to visible lags, is
presented.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
From March 1992 to December 1993, 100
consecutive patients with unilateral subacromial
impingement syndrome (stages 1 to 3)~ were entered into a prospective study. Only patients who
subsequently underwent open or arthroscopic rotator cuff exploration were included. Those with
any impairment of the passive range of glenohumeral motion were excluded.
The patients included 74 men and 26 women.
307
308
Hertel et al.
The ERLS and the drop sign in suprascapular palsy. In complete suprascapular
palsy the function of both supraspinatus and infraspinatus will clearly be absent. Because in effect
this condition is indistinguishable from the clinical
presentation of a massive tear of the supraspinatus
and infraspinatus tendons, both the ERLS and the
drop sign will be positive. However, we assessed
the value of the ERLS and the drop sign by correlation of these signs with intraoperative findings,
and no lesions of the posterosuperior cuff were
present in four cases of complete isolated suprascapular palsy examined. We therefore adopted
the convention of defining both signs as "falsepositive" for the presence of a cuff tear after
negative operative findings when a peripheral
neuropathy was present.
The internal rotation lag sign. The patient
is seated on an examination couch with his or her
back to the physician. The affected arm is held by
the physician at almost maximal internal rotation.
The elbow is flexed to 90 ~, and the shoulder is
held at 20 ~ elevation and 20 ~ extension. The
dorsum of the hand is passively lifted away from
the lumbar region until almost full internal rotation
is reached. The patient is then asked to actively
maintain this position as the physician releases the
wrist while maintaining support at the elbow. The
sign is positive when a lag occurs (Figure 3). The
magnitude of the lag is recorded to the nearest 5 ~.
An obvious drop of the hand may occur with large
tears. A slight lag indicates a partial tear of the
cranial part of the subscapularis tendon. Limitations applied to the testing and interpretation of the
ERLS also apply in testing for the IRLS. The IRLS is
designed to test for the integrity of the subscapularis tendon.
For the purposes of this investigation the clinical
Hertel et al.
309
Figure I Externalrotation lag sign. A, Arm is held at slight elevation and near
full external rotation; patient is then asked to maintain this position. B, Sign is
positive when Lag occurs. Magnitude of lag is judged in degrees.
examination included evaluation of the Jobe sign,
the lift-off sign, the ERLS, the drop sign, and the
IRLS. The magnitude of the angular lag was estimated to the nearest 5 ~, and was correlated with
the size of the tear measured at operation.
The sensitivity (Tp/Tp + Fn), specificity (Tn/Tn +
Fp), accuracy (Tp + Tn/total), positive predictive
value (Tp/Tp + Fp), and negative predictive value
(Tn/Tn+Fn) were calculated for each sign
(Tp = true-positive, Tn -- true-negative, Fp = falsepositive, and Fn = false negative). The significances of the measured differences between the signs
were also calculated with the critical ratio, z,
without the continuity correction.1
RESULTS
Supraspinatus and infraspinatus signs
(Table I). For the diagnosis of a tear in the pasterasuperior rotator cuff, the Jobe sign was more sensitive than the ERLS (p = 0.05). The external rotation lag sign was more sensitive than the drop sign
(p < 0.001 ). The external rotation lag sign was as
specific as the drop sign and was significantly
more specific than the Jobe sign (p = 0.002). No
significant difference was seen between the accuracy of the Jobe sign and the ERLS (p = 0.84). The
Jobe sign was more accurate than the drop sign
(p < 0.001). The external rotation lag sign was
more accurate than the drop sign (p < 0.001).
310
Hertel et al.
Figure 2 Drop sign. A, Arm is held at 90 ~ elevation and near full external
rotation; patient is then asked to maintain this position. B, Sign is positive when
lag or drop occurs. Magnitude of lag is judged in degrees.
The Jobe sign had a positive predictive value of
84% for the presence of a posterosuperior cuff
tear. The external rotation lag and drop signs both
had a positive predictive value of 100% for the
presence of a posterosuperior cuff tear. The negative predictive values were 58% for the Jobe sign,
56% for the ERLS, and 32% for the drop sign.
Subscapularis signs (Table I). The IRLS was
significantly more sensitive than the lift-off sign
(p = 0.002). The IRLS and the lift-off sign were
equally highly specific (p = 1.0). The IRLS was
significantly more accurate than the lift-off sign
(p = O.OO7).
The lift-off sign had a positive predictive value of
100% for the presence of a tear of the subscapularis, and the IRLS had a positive predictive value
of 97%. The IRLS had a negative predictive value
of 96% for the absence of a tear of the subscapularis, and the lift-off sign had a negative predictive
value of 69%.
Hertel et al.
311
Figure 3 internal rotation lag sign. A, Arm is held at slight extension and near
full internal rotation; patient is then asked to maintain this position. B, Sign is
positive when lag occurs. Magnitude of lag is judged in degrees.
intact rotator cuff and with partial rupture of the
supraspinatus. One of 17 patients with a complete
supraspinatus rupture had a drop of 10 ~ and 4 of
11 with complete supraspinatus and infraspinatus
rupture had a drop between 15 ~ and 20 ~ Eight of
the 16 patients with tears involving three tendons
had a drop between 15 ~ and 20 ~
Four of five patients with partial subscapularis
tears had an internal rotation tag of 5 ~, and all
eight patients with complete subscapularis rupture
had lags between 5 ~ and 10 ~.
DISCUSSION
Force measurements and observation of the
range of motion are useful for assessment of insufficiency of musculotendinous units. It was apparent
that estimation of force and measurement of the
312
Hertel et al.
Table I Positive clinical tests and condition (diagnosis) of the rotator cuff
Diagnosis
Sensitivity
2
4
5
7
2, 4, 5, 7
3
6
7
3,6or7
Specificity
1
Accuracy
1, 2, 4, 5, or 7
1,3,6or7
Positive predictive
values
2, 4, 5, or 7
3, 6, or7
Negative predictive
values
2, 4, 5 or 7
3, 6, or7
Jobe
ERLS
Drop
15/19
14/17
10/11
7/8
53/63
1/19
16/17
I
1
44/63
0
1/17
4/11
1/2
13/63
Lift-off
7/8
11/16
18/29
14/24
67/87
53/63
14/24
1
37/87
24/43
1
68/87
24/74
IRLS
4/5
1
1
28/29
23/24
42/53
51/53
28/29
24/35
23/24
The denominator is the number of patients tested for the sign given. Where a value of 1 is given, all patients tested were positive
for the sign.
Diagnosis 1, intact rotator cuff; diagnosis 2, partial rupture of the supraspinatus; diagnosis 3, partial rupture of the subscapuloris;
diagnosis 4, supraspinatus rupture; diagnosis 5, supraspinatus and infraspinatus rupture; diagnosis 6, subscapularis rupture;
diagnosis 7, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis rupture.
Hertel et al.
313