Professional Documents
Culture Documents
mainly represented a shift from more serious national dailies to tabloids. Readership of
Chinese dailies also increased slightly during this period. This may be because, while the
English and Malay language newspapers are more similar in content and style, Chinese
papers have developed more independently, with some employing more sensational
reporting, often evident in their crime reporting. They are also more willing to criticize
the government. The Chinese-language medias relative independence was demonstrated
in a 2008 survey, in which consumers rated them as having the most balanced election
coverage compared with other media. (See Appendix 1)
Television and Radio
Television is the most popular means of media consumption in Malaysia, with two main
players, state-owned Radio Television Malaysia (RTM) and privately owned, but progovernment, Media Prima Group. RTM operates two free-to-air territorial local
television channels and 32 radio channels nationwide, while Media Prima is the parent of
four television and three radio channels. Privately owned Astro All Asia runs Malaysias
only satellite TV network. State-affiliated outlets typically reflect government views in
their coverage, but even privately owned televisions stations, which typically have close
ties to the ruling coalition, normally exercise self-censorship. (See Appendix 2)
Online Media
Because mainstream media in Malaysia is tightly controlled by the government, the
country has an active alternative and social media, evidenced by such popular news
portals as Malaysiakini (the countrys top news website) and The Malaysia Insider.
These and other online news sites are relatively free of government censorship as a result
of the governments pledge not to restrict the Internet despite its control over much of
traditional mass media, but they are by no means completely free from government
actions.
Over 17 million Malaysians are online, a 61% penetration rate, and social media is
growing rapidly. Nearly two-thirds of Internet users are aged 21 to 40. Leading
government and opposition figures are active on both Facebook and Twitter. (See
Appendix 3)
This has resulted in increased readership of news sites online. In April 2012,
Malaysiakini received over 400,000 unique visitors a day, more than double the number
it received two years before. News aggregators such as News.google.com and
News.yahoo.com are also highly popular.
Malaysians are also heavy users of social media. In December 2011, there were more
than 12 million Facebook users, representing 46% of the population and 71% of total
Internet users. A 2010 survey by a global research group, TNS, found that Malaysians
have the highest number of Facebook friends in the world, averaging 233 friends each.
Malaysians also spent the most time on social networking sites, averaging nine hours per
week. As of April 2013, there were about 1.3 million Twitter users in the country.
This guarantee is subject to a caveat in clause 10(2) (a) which says that parliament may
impose:
such restrictions as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the Federation or any
part thereof, friendly relations with other countries, public order or morality and restrictions designed to
protect the privileges of parliament or of any Legislative Assembly or to provide against contempt of court,
defamation, or incitement to any offence
This clause sets the tone in demonstrating how freedom of the media in Malaysia is
subjugated to public order and morality through national security legislation.
Sedition Act 19482
This act has its origins in post-World War II British legislation, and grants authorities the
ability to curb actions that have a seditious tendency. In Section 3(1), these include a
tendency:
(a) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against any Ruler or against any
Government
(b) to excite the subjects of any Ruler or the inhabitants of any territory governed by any Government
to attempt to procure in the territory of the Ruler or governed by the Government,
the alteration,
otherwise than by lawful means, of any matter as by law established
(c) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the administration of justice in
Malaysia or in any State
(d) to raise discontent or disaffection amongst the subjects of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (Head of
State) or of the Ruler of any State or amongst the inhabitants of Malaysia or of any State;
(e) to promote feelings of ill will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of
Malaysia
(f) to question any matter, right, status, position, privilege, sovereignty or prerogative established or
protected by the provisions of Part III of the Federal Constitution or Article 152, 153 or 181 of the
Federal Constitution (note: regarding the powers of executive branches, sovereignty and language
and ethnicity arrangements)
The penalties, as outlined in Section 4 of the act, condemn any person who conspires to a
seditious act, utters seditious words, publishes, possesses, prints, distributes, imports or
sells such materials, to fines and imprisonment of up to three years, with sentences of five
years for repeat offenders.
1
Section 9 deals with suspension of newspapers that contain seditious materials, and
entitles the court to make decisions:
(a) prohibiting, either absolutely or except on conditions to be specified in the order, for any period not
exceeding one year from the date of the order, the future publication of that newspaper
(b) prohibiting, either absolutely or except on conditions to be specified in the order, for the period
aforesaid, the publisher, proprietor, or editor of that newspaper or from publishing, editing or writing for
any newspaper, or from assisting, whether with money or moneys worth, material, personal service, or
otherwise in the publication, editing, or production of any newspaper
Printing presses may be seized and offenders liable to fines and a sentence of up to three
years. Other powers afforded by this act include arrest without warrant (Section 11), a
ban on existing circulations of seditious materials (Section 10) and search of premises
without warrant on reasonable suspicion of possessing seditious materials (Section 8).
How the Sedition Act is Applied3
The Sedition Act has been used in recent times to curb freedom of the media and freedom
of expression, including political dissent and peaceful protests4. While Malaysian Prime
Minister Najib Razak pledged to repeal the act last year5, the law is still being used to
stifle dissent, particularly in the realm of social media.
In July 2013, bloggers Alvin Tan and Vivian Lee were jailed under the Sedition Act for
posting a Ramadan greeting that featured them eating bak kut teh, a pork dish. They have
been charged and are awaiting sentencing6.
The Sun Daily reported that a Facebook user who had allegedly insulted the police had
recently been charged under the Sedition Act7. Similarly, The New Straits Times reported
a woman was arrested in June 2013 for insulting the king on Facebook8. In 2012, the
political cartoonist Zunar lost his appeal against his arrest under the Sedition Act for the
publication of a cartoon in 20109.
3
See FMY News How to avoid being seditious (21 July 2013)
http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2013/07/21/how-to-avoid-being-seditious/ for an in
depth discussion on the interpretation of this law.
4
Malaysia: Release activists arrested in government U-turn on repressive law Amnesty International (23
May 2013) http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/malaysia-release-activists-arrested-government-u-turnrepressive-law-2013-05-23
5
Malaysia to repeal repressive sedition law The Guardian (12 July 2012)
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jul/12/malaysia-repeal-repressive-sedition-law
6
Alvin and Vivian jailed Huffington Post (18 July 2013)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/18/alvin-and-vivian-jailed-malaysia-sexbloggers_n_3616657.html
7
Soon-to-go Sedition Act still being used The Sun Daily (13 August 2013)
http://www.thesundaily.my/news/795899
8
Woman held over royal insult New Straits Times (5 June 2013)
http://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/woman-held-over-royal-insult-1.294018
9
Courts Ruling on Cartoonists Suit Sets Disturbing Precedent For Media Freedom Reporters Without
Borders press release (31 July 2012)
A resort manager was being investigated in August 2013 after uploading a Youtube video
showing Buddhists using a Muslim prayer room16. He is being cited under Section 295
of the Penal Code: Injuring or defiling a place of worship with intent to insult the
religion of any class.
Chapter 15 of the code, Offenses Related to Religion, outlines several other laws that
could be used to curb press freedom including Uttering words, etc., with deliberate
intent to wound the religious feelings of any person (Section 298) and Causing, etc.,
disharmony, disunity, or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will, or prejudicing, etc., the
maintenance of harmony or unity, on grounds of religion (Section 298A)17. Bloggers
Alvin Tan and Vivian Lee, who posted the Ramadan pork greeting online, are being
charged under this law, in addition to their prosecution under the Sedition Act.
Conclusions
National security and sedition legislation provides a full arsenal of weapons for the
Malaysian government to curb freedom of expression in the media. While proposals are
in the pipeline to reform the Sedition Act (or repeal it altogether), other security
legislation at the Malaysian governments disposal has proven to be effective in
repressing the press and online voices.
A multitude of traps have thus been set for reporters, commentators, users of social
media, and citizen journalists. There is a real threat of short-term detention,
incarceration, and fines for reporters and netizens, along with an inability to protect
sources. The result is a string of deterrents to the gathering and publishing of
information.
As such, Malaysian national security and sedition legislation continues to be an obstacle
to the freedom of media and expression in the country. While this may be advantageous
as a mechanism of social control, it is likely to cause increasing disruption with the
growing influence of the Internet, as well as hamper the economy. Businesses that
require the free flow of information and guarantee of privacy in communications will see
an environment that is difficult to openly operate in, and may have concerns about human
rights.
Internet Controversies and Censorship (Leyun Shao)
Legislating Internet Restrictions
The development of Malaysias Internet began in 1988 when the Malaysian Institute of
Microelectronic Systems set up a university computer network called Rangkaian
Komputer Malaysia (Malaysian Computer Network). The government later established
16
In crackdown on religion, activists see a nation in fear The Malay Mail Online (August 14 2013)
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/in-crackdown-on-religion-activists-see-a-nation-infear
17
Laws Of Malaysia: Act 574 Penal Code http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%2012/Act%20574.pdf
SANS Institute InfoSec Reading Room, Malaysian Law and Computer Crime
http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/legal/malaysian-law-computer-crime-670
Muslims, online news sites are able to publish critical articles on the subject.21 The
Internet has also been a place to challenge corruption and human rights concerns, though
existing laws require bloggers to tread carefully.22
Other examples include LoyarBurok.com, which is an active blog highlighting human
rights and public accountability. Another, Seksualiti Merdeka (Sexuality Independence),
relies on social media platforms to foster greater understanding of sexual rights, while
LGBT issues are taboo in traditional media. Columnists whose articles are censored or
heavily edited will often publish their original versions on their own blogs.
However, this pushing of the envelope has not gone unnoticed by the government. Laws
such as the Sedition Act and the Communications and Multimedia Act have been used to
target such offences as insulting a government leader on Facebook or questioning the
provision of housing subsidies for Malays.23 The government has also attempted to
introduce online sedition guidelines24 and imposed curbs on online media by making
them subject to the licensing laws. But these plans were shelved indefinitely after a
public outcry.
Online sites that publish critical contents on the government have faced Distributed
Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks from anonymous sources during critical times.
For example, according to the Mapping Digital Media: Malaysia report,
Malaysiakini.com sustained several DDoS attacks, especially during significant events
such as the Bersih rallies (Walk for Democracy) in 2011 and 2012 and during the
Sarawak state elections in 2011. Orchestrated attacks jammed the site and made it
difficult for users to access it.
The report also noticed that other attacks occurred during the run-up to Malaysias May
2013 general election. The technology news site, The Verge, reported a flood of DDoS
21
Written By Jo-Ann Ding and Lay Chin Koh (lead reporters),Jacqueline Ann Surin
(reporter), Edited By Marius Dragomir and Mark Thompson (Open Society Media
Program editors), Graham Watts (regional editor), Mapping Digital Media: Malaysia, (16
May 2013)
http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/mapping-digital-media-malaysia
22
Freedom
attacks and ISP blocks against opposition sites and independent media just before the
election. It also reported that Malaysian ISPs had blocked specific domains critical of the
ruling party, such as a YouTube video seen as critical to the regime.
Opposition Facebook pages have been targeted by orchestrated attacks as well. The
Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), however, denied
that ISPs were blocking websites, citing increased visitor numbers as the reason why
certain sites could not be accessed.
But the MCMC itself has blocked websites.25 In 2008, it confirmed that it had ordered all
ISPs to block the online news blog Malaysia Today (Malaysia-today.net) for several
days.26 The blog was well known for publishing sensational accounts of government
corruption. MCMC explained that the site was blocked because some of the comments
were insensitive, bordering on incitement.
Another incident occurred in 2010 when a blogger and political activist, Raja Petra
Kamarudin, who was the founder of Malaysia Today, said the site was experiencing
mysterious technical problems after publishing an article accusing UMNO of
corruption involving the national carrier.27
While much freer than traditional media, Malaysias Internet freedom has nevertheless
worsened, according to a study of 47 countries in the latest report of Freedom on the Net
2012: A Global Assessment of Internet and Digital Media.
The report assessed Malaysias state of Internet freedom as partly free and downgraded
it two notches. Malaysia was identified as one of the countries at risk of further decline
due to new restrictive laws, such as recent amendments to the Evidence Act of 1950 and
the prevalence of such acts as cyber-attacks on prominent news websites and oppositionlinked sites, as well as the arrest of bloggers.
Amendments to Section 114A of the Evidence Act were the second of two sets of
amendments to be hastily made in April 2012. The amendment makes individuals and
those who administer, operate or provide spaces for online community forums, blogging,
and hosting services, liable for content published through its services.28
Critics argued that the presumption of guilt or responsibility went against a fundamental
principle of justice - innocent until proven guilty - and disproportionately burdened the
average person who may not have the resources to defend himself in court. It also
enabled law enforcement officials to hold publishers of websites accountable for
25
the Sun, No blockage of access to websites by ISP: MCMC, (3 May 2013)
http://www.thesundaily.my/news/687103
(accessed
14
May
2013).
26
A. Ong, Malaysia Today blocked! Order from MCMC, (27 August 2008)
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/88683
27
Asia Sentinel, Malaysian Website Blocked to Cover up a Scandal, (9 September 2010)
http://www.asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2687&Itemid=178
28
Malaysia
http://malaysiafactbook.com/Section_114A_of_the_Evidence_Act
seditious, defamatory, or libelous postings even though they were not the authors of the
content.29
Opposition to the Section 114A amendments led to the designation of August 14, 2012,
as Internet Blackout Day, during which a host of news websites, bloggers, and civil
society organizations, including the highly respected Malaysian Bar Council, pledged to
either take down their websites for the day or support a pop-up window to promote a
Stop 114A Campaign.30 Though Prime Minister Najib Razak responded by tweeting I
have asked the Cabinet to discuss Section 114A of the Evidence Act 1950. Whatever we
do we must put people first,31 no changes were made to the amendment.
Other incidents demonstrate that online media is far from being free of restrictions and
censorship. In 2010, several bloggers were prosecuted, including Khairul Nizam Abd
Ghani, a freelance computer technician. He was charged with insulting royalty for
posting on his blog, adukataruna.blogspot.com, comments critical of Sultan Iskandar
Ismail of the State of Johor, who died in January 2010. He is facing up to one year in
prison and a fine, even though he has apologized and withdrawn the incriminating article
from his blog.32
In July 2011, a Kuala Lumpur court ordered political blogger Amizudin Ahmat to pay
USD 100,000 in damages and USD33,000 in costs in a defamation suit brought by the
Minister of Information, Communications and Culture over a blog entry suggesting that
he raped his Indonesian maid. Amizudin clearly did not take all the necessary care, but
he was not the author of the contested article, which he copied from a website," Reporters
Without Borders said. "He subsequently apologized for not checking his sources and
removed it from his blog. This evidence of good faith should have elicited a lenient
response from the court and the minister, who instead persisted with his judicial
persecution. We can only condemn this excessive damages award, it said. Amizudin
Ahmat was later sentenced to three months imprisonment for contempt of court. And the
sentence was deferred in August, 2012.33 Numerous similar cases have occurred in
Malaysia over the past several years.
29
K Pragalath, Repeal or amend Section 114A, says Suhakam, (26 August 2012)
http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/08/26/repeal-or-amend-section-114a-says-
suhakam/
30
Freedom
http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2013/malaysia
31
Mohd
http://en.rsf.org/malaysia-opposition-blogger-ordered-to-pay-20-07-2011,40659.html
Malaysia: Defamation case against human rights defender Charles Hector Fernandez ended with a
settlement. (Aug 26, 2011). World organization against torture (OMCT).
<http://www.omct.org/human-rights-defenders/urgent-interventions/malaysia/2011/08/d21400/>
[10/1/2013]
35
NST sues Jeff Ooi, Rocky for defamation. (Jan 19, 2007). The Sun Daily.
<http://www.thesundaily.my/node/171526> [10/1/2013]
36
Cyberlaws in Malaysia. NITC Malaysia (National Information Technology Council (NITC).
http://nitc.mosti.gov.my/nitc_beta/index.php/national-ict-policies/cyberlaws-in-malaysia [10/4/2013]
37
Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. Laws of Malaysia.
http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%2012/Act%20588.pdf [10/4/2013]
The Computer Crimes Act 1997 establishes unauthorized access to computers as a crime.
It is illegal to use computers to commit or facilitate an offence, while identity and
information theft and unauthorized modifications are also outlawed under this Act.
Section 8 of the Computer Crimes Act presumes that a person is deemed to have
obtained unauthorized access if he has in his custody or control any program, data or
other information which is held in any computer or retrieved from any computer which
he is not authorized to have in his custody.38
The Digital Signature Act 1997 pertains to the licensing and regulation of certification
authorities who are delegated the authority to certify identities of individuals who
undertake digital signatures, which are also made legally valid in this document.
Cybercrime is reported to have caused around USD 315 million in losses in the first half
of 2012, according to Malaysian police.39 CyberSecurity Malaysia, an agency under the
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) that supports enforcement
agencies with cyber forensics and analysis and advises the government on cyber laws,
reports that out of 2,499 cases reported in the first quarter, 1,160 involved cheating, while
862 related to unauthorized access.40
According to the Security Threat Report 2013 published by Sophos, a network security
developer and solutions provider, Malaysia is ranked the fifth riskiest country globally
with a 17.44% threat exposure rate to cyber attacks. This rate refers to the percentage of
PCs that experienced a malware attack, whether successful or failed, over a three month
period.41
There appear to be no overt linkages between cyber laws and press freedom in Malaysia.
The Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 and Computer Crimes Act 1997, as
standalone laws, do not have clauses that specifically limit the freedom of speech, but
CyberSecurity does point out that one is committing a cybercrime if ICT devices are
used as mediums of committing crimes. For example, sedition, disharmony or unrest,
slandering and instigating at higher scale come under this category.42 The agency states
that cyber laws are not necessary for prosecution; instead, there are other laws such as
the Sedition Act and Security Offences Special Measures Act which can readily be
invoked.
Self-regulation
38
Press freedom in Malaysia is implied in Article 10 of the constitution, which states that,
every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression.43 Self-regulation is
mentioned in the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Content Code (henceforth
Content Code), which was drawn up by the Communications and Multimedia Content
Forum of Malaysia44 in compliance with the Communications and Multimedia Act of
1998.
The Content Code, being a voluntary industry code, seeks to identify what is regarded
offensive and questionable while spelling out obligations of content providers within the
context of social values in the country.45 In Part 8, it states that, good governance
through self-discipline and self-monitoring is the best form of administration as it
ultimately services the interest of all parties concerned.46
The Code sets out comprehensive guidelines against bad language, false content, violence
and obscenities, crime- or conflict-inducing suppositions, as well as negative portrayals
of women, children, family values, culture, race, and religion in media, broadcasting, and
advertising. It also includes a section pertaining to online media, but declares that, there
shall be no censorship of the internet,47 citing the overwhelming benefits brought about
by such a medium.48 While recognizing that the online environment differs radically
from existing media, it also highlights that the online environment is not a legal
vacuum.49
In a study conducted by a research team at the University of Putra Malaysia (UPM),
members and non-members of the Content Forum were surveyed and asked to evaluate
the Content Code as a mechanism for self-regulation. They concurred that the detailed
guidelines provide transparency and serve as a good reference point, as it involves
different parties in the media and the general public. Some bloggers reportedly also felt
that the formation of an independent body or institution to curb the merging trend of
social media users openly instigating and promoting hatred and chaos in the cyber-world
could assist in self-regulation.50
On the other hand, critics say that the Code, in practice, can serve as a blueprint for
censorship and content control. Responders pointed out that the regulations, though
43
51
Appendices
Appendix 1: Readership of selected newspapers (000), 2005, 2008, and 2011
Newspaper
Language
Harian Metro
Malay
Owner
2005
2008
2011
Media Prima
1,538
2,205
3,722
Mandarin
1,186
1,139
1,240
The Star
English
MCA
1,040
1,082
1,078
Berita Harian
Malay
Media Prima
1,358
1,213
1,035
Utusan Malaysia
Malay
Utusan Group
1,277
917
699
English
Media Prima
305
308
240
Source: Mapping Digital Media: Malaysia, May 2013 (a report by the Open Society Foundations)
2007
2011
Share (%)
2007
2009
2011
2009
TV1
4,229
3,035
3,268
7.1
4.1
4.6
TV2
4,874
5,155
4,695
8.2
9.4
7.5
TV3
8,397
8,427
7,990
30.4
27.7
25.2
NTV7
3,419
3,105
3,042
6.0
5.5
4.9
8TV
2,507
2,296
2,367
4.9
4.6
5.3
TV9
3,693
4,114
3,895
7.5
7.9
7.3
242
0.0
0.0
0.1
27,119
26,132
25,499
TV Al-Hijrah
Total
Source: Mapping Digital Media: Malaysia, May 2013 (a report by the Open Society Foundations)
2009
2010
Dec 2011
May 2012
Thestar.com
768
788
1,579
1,660
Malaysiakini.com
Purely online
548
547
1,001
1,096
Utusan.com
562
523
900
887
My Metro (Hmetro.com.my)
495
545
n/a
n/a
Themalaysianinsider.com
Purely online
n/a
474
450
541
Source: Mapping Digital Media: Malaysia, May 2013 (a report by the Open Society Foundation
Appendix 4
Malaysian Internet Penetration by Online Media on February 2012
News Online Media
Penetration
thestar.com.my
2,221,763
utusan.com.my
1,171,578
bharian.com.my
769,772
malaysiakini.com
1,858,649
themalaysianinsider.com
1,117,124
Source: Malaysian Digital Associations (MDA)
Appendix 5
Overview of the Computer Crimes Act 1997 (CCA 1997)
The following is a summary of the offences relating to misuse of computers as extracted
from the Explanatory Statement of the CCA1997:
a) Seeks to make it an offence for any person to cause any computer to perform any
function with intent to secure unauthorized access to any computer material.
b) Seeks to make it a further offence if any person who commits an offence referred to in
item (a) with intent to commit fraud, dishonesty or to cause injury as defined in the Penal
Code.
c) Seeks to make it an offence for any person to cause unauthorized modifications of the
contents of any computer.
d) Seeks to provide for the offence and punishment for wrongful communication of a
number, code, password or other means of access to a computer.
e) Seeks to provide for offences and punishment for abetments and attempts in the
commission of offences referred to in items (a), (b), (c) and (d) above.
f) Seeks to create a statutory presumption that any person having custody or control of
any program, data or other information when he is not authorised to have it will be
deemed to have obtained unauthorized access unless it is proven otherwise.
References
Media Environment
Department of State Human Rights Report 2012 (Malaysia)
(http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/)
Freedom House: Freedom of the Press: Malaysia 2013 (www.freedomhouse.org)
List of Newspapers in Malaysia, Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org)
Malaysia Media Profile, a BBC report (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific15384221)
Mapping Digital Media: Malaysia, A Report by the Open Society Foundations, May
2013 (http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/mapping-digital-media-malaysia)
Media of Malaysia, Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.gov)
Reporters Without Borders: 2013 World Press Freedom Index: Dashed Hopes After
Spring, 2013 (http://en.rsf.org/malaysia.html)
Straits Times: Credibility of Malaysias Mainstream Newspapers at Stake, The
Malaysian Insider, June 2, 20123
(http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/straits-times-credibility-ofmalaysias-mainstream-newspapers-at-stake)
Licensing and Ownership
Center for Independent Journalism (http://cijmalaysia.org/)
Freedom House: Freedom of the Press: Malaysia 2013 (www.freedomhouse.org)
IFEX (http://www.ifex.org/malaysia/)
Malaysia Factbook (http://malaysiafactbook.com/Encyclopedia_of_Malaysia)
Malaysia Sedition Act, 1948 (http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%201/Act%2015.pdf)
Mapping Digital Media: Malaysia, A Report by the Open Society Foundations, May 2013
(http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/mapping-digital-media-malaysia)
Reporters Without Borders: 2013 World Press Freedom Index
(http://en.rsf.org/malaysia.html)
Laws of Malaysia Act 747 Security Offenses (Special Measures) Act 2012
http://www.federalgazette.agc.gov.my/outputaktap/20120622_747_BI_Act%20747%20B
I.pdf
Malaysia detains dissent writer BBC News (23 September 2008)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7630789.stm
Malaysian Federal Constitution
http://www.agc.gov.my/images/Personalisation/Buss/pdf/Federal%20Consti%20(BI%20t
ext).pdf
Malaysia: Release activists arrested in government U-turn on repressive law Amnesty
International (23 May 2013) http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/malaysia-release-activistsarrested-government-u-turn-repressive-law-2013-05-23
Malaysia to repeal repressive sedition law The Guardian (12 July 2012)
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jul/12/malaysia-repeal-repressive-sedition-law
Prison sentence deferred Reporters without Borders (30 August 2012)
http://en.rsf.org/malaysia-opposition-blogger-ordered-to-pay-20-07-2011,40659.html
Soon-to-go Sedition Act still being used The Sun Daily (13 August 2013)
http://www.thesundaily.my/news/795899
Take action: help free Nathaniel Tan Centre for Independent Journalism petition
http://cijmalaysia.org/2007/07/14/take-action-help-free-nathaniel-tan
Woman held over royal insult New Straits Times (5 June 2013)
http://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/woman-held-over-royal-insult-1.294018
Internet Controversies and Censorship Issues
In detaining blogger, Malaysia invokes secrets act
http://www.cpj.org/2012/07/in-detaining-blogger-malaysia-invokes-secrets-act.php
Mapping Digital Media: Malaysia
http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/mapping-digital-media-malaysia
Malaysias Computer Crimes Act 1997 Gets Tough On Cybercrime But Fails to
Advance the Development of Cyberlaws, Donna L. Beatty
http://digital.law.washington.edu/dspacelaw/bitstream/handle/1773.1/859/7PacRimLPolyJ351.pdf?sequence=1
Malaysian Law and Computer Crime By Chong Yew, Wong (GSEC Practical
Assignment v1.2f)
http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/legal/malaysian-law-computer-crime670?show=malaysian-law-computer-crime-670&cat=legal
Malaysia Internet Blackout Day (2012)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Internet_Blackout_Day_(2012)
Malaysian cyber laws
http://nitc.mosti.gov.my/nitc_beta/index.php/national-ict-policies/cyberlaws-inmalaysia
Malaysia Internet Usage Stats and Marketing Report
http://www.internetworldstats.com/asia/my.htm
Malaysian Website Rankings for February 2012
http://www.digital.org.my/pdf/MDA-EM_WebsiteRanking_Report_Feb12.pdf
Opposition blogger ordered to pay exorbitant damages to minister
http://www.ifex.org/malaysia/2011/07/22/amizudin_defamation_suit/
Defamation and Cybercrime
2,499 cyber crime cases up to March. New Sarawak Tribune.
http://www.newsarawaktribune.com/news/2587/2499-cyber-crime-cases-up-to-March/
[10/4/2013]
Arshad, A.H.. (Jan/Feb 2004). Rights of accused persons: Are safeguards being
reduced? The Malaysia Bar, Badan Peguam Malaysia.
http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/human_rights/rights_of_accused_persons_are_safeguar
ds_being_reduced_.html [10/1/2013]
Communications and Multimedia Act 1998.
http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%2012/Act%20588.pdf [10/4/2013]
Computer Crimes Act 1997.
http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%2012/Act%20563.pdf [10/4/2013
CyberSecurity Malaysia.
http://www.cybersecurity.my/en/media_centre/media_faqs/media_faqs/main/detail/1691/i
ndex.html [10/4/2013]
Defamation Act 1957. Laws of Malaysia.
http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%206/Act%20286.pdf [10/1/2013]
Evidence Act 1950, Laws of Malaysia.
http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%202/Act%2056%20%20Evidence%20Act%201950.pdf [10/1/2013]
First arrests under Malaysias oppressive new security law. (Feb 7, 2013). Amnesty
International. http://www.amnesty.org/en/for-media/press-releases/first-arrests-undermalaysia-s-oppressive-new-security-law-2013-02-07 [10/1/2013]
Freedom press index 2013. Reporters Without Borders. http://en.rsf.org/pressfreedom-index-2013,1054.html [10/1/2013]
Gong, R.. Internet politics and state media control: Candidate weblogs in Malaysia.
Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 54, No.3 (Fall 2011), pp.307-328.
Internal Security Act 1960. Laws of Malaysia.
http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%202/Act%2082.pdf [10/1/2013]
Introduction of SOSMA to replace ISA draws mixed reaction from law practitioners.
(May 26, 2013). New Straits Times. http://www.nst.com.my/latest/introduction-ofsosma-to-replace-isa-draws-mixed-reaction-from-law-practitioners-1.286790 [Accessed:
10/1/2013]
Lim, Y.H.. (Aug 14, 2012). For many Malaysians, Section 114A sucks in the age of
social media.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/limyunghui/2012/08/14/for-many-malaysians-section-114asucks-in-the-age-of-social-media/ [10/1/2013]
Malaysia. Freedom House. http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedompress/2012/malaysia/ [10/1/2013]
Malaysia slips in global rankings of internet freedom. (Oct 2, 2012). Centre for
Independent Journalism. http://cijmalaysia.org/2012/10/02/malaysia-slips-in-globalrankings-of-internet-freedom/ [10/1/2013]
Malaysia: Defamation case against human rights defender Charles Hector Fernandez
ended with a settlement. (Aug 26, 2011). World organization against torture (OMCT).
http://www.omct.org/human-rights-defenders/urgentinterventions/malaysia/2011/08/d21400/
[10/1/2013]
Malaysia: End harassment of key human rights organizations. (Aug 7, 2013). Amnesty
International. http://www.amnesty.org/en/for-media/press-releases/malaysia-endharassment-key-human-rights-organization-2013-08-07 [10/1/2013]
National IT Council Malaysia. http://nitc.mosti.gov.my/nitc_beta/index.php/the-nationalit-council [10/4/2013]
NST sues Jeff Ooi, Rocky for defamation. (Jan 19, 2007). The Sun Daily.
http://www.thesundaily.my/node/171526 [10/1/2013]