Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT
TITLE
: ABSTRACT
NAME
MATRIC NO.
LECTURERS NAME
DATE
Table of Content
Page
1
i.
Cover page
ii.
Table of content
2
iii.
Assignment
1. Abstract
1.1 Inroduction
1.2
3
Function of Abstract
1.3
4
Parts of an Abstract
1.4
4-5
Conclusion
5
2. (a)
(b)
Mind Map
Summary
6
7-
8
iv.
References
Introduction
b.4
Function of Abstract
It is a highly condensed version of the paper itself. After reading the
abstract, the reader knows the main points that the authors have to make.
The reader can then evaluate the significance of the paper and then
decide whether or not she or he wishes to read the full paper. If one elects
to read the full paper, further detail is given about each of the significant
topics, but no new topics of importance are introduced. If one decides not
to read the paper, that decision is based on a knowledge of the papers
content. Although the abstract appears first in a paper, it is generally
the last part written. Only after the paper has been completed can the
authors decide what should be in the abstract and what parts are
supporting detail.
1.3
Parts of an Abstract
Motivation:
Why do we care about the problem and the results? If the problem
isnt obviously interesting it might be better to put motivation
first; but if your work is incremental progress on a problem that is
widely recognized as important, then it is probably better to put the
problem statement first to indicate which piece of the larger
problem you are breaking off to work on. This section should include
the importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the
impact it might have if successful.
Problem:
What problem are you trying to solve? What is the scope of your
work (a generalized approach, or for a specific situation)? Be careful
not to use too much jargon. In some cases it is appropriate to put
the problem statement before the motivation, but usually this only
Approach:
How did you go about solving or making progress on the problem?
Did you use simulation, analytic models, prototype construction, or
analysis of field data for an actual product? What was the extentof
your work (did you look at one application program or a hundred
programs in twenty different programming languages?) What
important variables did you control, ignore, or measure?
Results:
Whats the answer? Specifically, most good computer architecture
papers conclude that something is so many percent faster, cheaper,
smaller, or otherwise better than something else. Put the result
there, in numbers. Avoid vague, hand-waving results such as very,
small, or significant. If you must be vague, you are only given
license to do so when you can talk about orders-of-magnitude
improvement. There is a tension here in that you should not provide
numbers that can be easily misinterpreted, but on the other hand
you dont have room for all the caveats.
Conclusions:
What are the implications of your answer? Is it going to change the
world (unlikely), be a significant win, be a nice hack, or simply
serve as a road sign indicating that this path is a waste of time (all
of the previous results are useful). Are your results general,
potentially generalizable, or specific to a particular case?
1.4
Conclusion
(b)
(b) Write an essay in your own words (do not copy sentences out
of the paper) that
Journal
article
entitled
Investigation
of
Soy
Protein-Kymene
product
because
of
chemical
in
it.
Additionally,
it
is
The reaction time was tested using welch-modified t-test and it found out
that this adhesive 95% of confidence level. Sheer strength was tested
using P-value and it comes out that Phenol Formaldehyde is higher than
Kymene in strength but Kymene is high of water resistance.
This is a very good journal but there are several things that can be
critique from this journal. Firstly, the researcher does not have a good
abstract because it has limited information about the research. This
makes the readers not interested to read the whole journal. Good abstract
decide whether the reader should continue reading or not. Beside that,
there is no example or picture of machine include in the journal. Every
research of bioadhesive in the wood composite industries should mention
the type of machine and show it for information. Last but not least, the
result shows did not complete. There are four type of test should
conducted for wood composite before use as construction panel. This
journal only show two test which is sheer strength and water resistance
test. It should contain texture test and density test.
References
Kymene
Adhesive
Systems
for
Wood
Composites.