Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Training Objectives
At the end of this training you should be able to:
Understand the characteristics that do not add
value.
Initiating a system to eliminate waste.
Understand how to create value stream maps.
Understand how to use lean management tools.
Understand how to implement lean management
principles in manufacturing and administrative
areas.
Exercise 1:
Where are You on this scale?
1
I am a Lean expert
Module 1
Introduction:
System
Analysis
Exercise 2:
Exercise 3:
Module 2
Lean
Introduction
10
Creators of Lean
Taiichi Ohno
(1912 1990)
Shigeo Shingo
1909 1990
11
12
Customer
Order
Waste
Product
Shipment
Time
Lean Manufacturing
Customer
Order
Waste
Product
Shipment
Time (Shorter)
13
14
15
Some Facts
Some of General Motors (GM) products include:
o Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, Opel, Vauxhall,
and Holden
Toyota
GM
Sales (2007)
9,366,000
9,370,000
Profit/car
+$1,870
-$4,000
16
History
Richard Schonberger,
Edward Deming,
Japanese Manufacturing
Techniques
1982
1982
Henry Ford
(Assembly Lines)
Eli Whitney
(Interchangeable
Parts)
1820
Taiichi Ohno
(Toyota Production System)
M. Porter,
1900
1935
Frank Gilbreth
(Process Charts)
(Motion Study)
Frederick Taylor
(Time Study)
(Work Standards)
Walter Shewhart
(Statistical
Process Control)
1945
1950
Value Chain
1985
1970
1980
Ishikawas
Fishbone Diagram
Edward Deming,
Joseph Juran
(TQM)
Shigeo Shingo
(Just In Time)
(Zero Defects)
(SMED)
1990
2000
Peter Drucker
The Practice of
Management
1954
17
History (contd)
How Toyota started:
o 1926, Automatic Looming Machines
o 1929, Patent was sold for 100,000 Pounds ()
o 1930, Toyota Motor Company was established
18
History (contd)
Toyota visited Ford in 1930s and again 1950s
Toyota noticed the following:
o Huge machines
o Mass production
o Large inventories
o Few models
o Very little improvements
since 1930s
19
History (contd)
Toyota wondered whether Fords production system
will work for Japan or not, since:
o The Japanese market is extremely small
o Cash flow is limited
o The Japanese customer is different
Result: Toyota Production System (TPS)
20
History (contd)
1980, Americans studied the Toyota Production
System (TPS)
1989, The Machine That Changed The World book
was published by J. Womack
Womack named TPS as Lean Production
21
22
Lean Production
Inventory Buffers
Minimum Waste
Just-In-Case Deliveries
Just-In-Time Deliveries
Just-In-Case Inventory
Minimum Inventory
Worker Teams
Maximum Efficiency
Worker Involvement
Continuous Improvement
23
Module 3
Lean
Principles
24
Shinrai trust
Kachi value
Muda waste
25
27
28
Classification of Activities
in Lean Management
All activities in an organization can be classified in
three categories:
1. Actual Work: Value Added (VA) Activity.
2. Auxiliary Work: Non-Value Added (NVA I)
Activity but Necessary.
3. Pure Waste: Non-Value Added (NVA II) Activity.
29
Classification of Activities
in Lean Management (contd)
It is not unusual to observe that approx. 95% of all
activities in an organization are non-value added.
5% Value
Added
30
31
Remember
VA activities: Enhance, Increase, Improve
NVA activities: Eliminate, Minimize, Combine
32
Moving people
to access or
process
material or
information
Waiting for material or
information, or material
or information waiting to
be processed
Errors or mistakes causing
the effort to be redone to
correct the problem
Moving material or
information
33
Definitions of Waste
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
34
36
38
39
TRADITIONAL
CONTINUOUS FLOW
40
41
42
Operation,
Transportation,
Inspection,
Delay,
Storage,
43
Process Charts
Step
No.
Time
(min)
Distance
(ft)
0.50
15.0
10.00
0.75
3.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
10
2.00
11
3.00
12
2.00
13
3.00
14
2.00
15
1.00
16
4.00
17
2.00
18
4.00
19
1.00
X
40.0
X
40.0
60.0
Return to bed in ER
X
X
60.0
X
Check out
X
X
20.0
180.0
200.0
X
200.0
Step Description
Walk to pharmacy
Pick up prescription
44
Process Charts
Step
No.
Time
(min)
Distance
(ft)
0.50
15.0
10.00
0.75
3.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
Store
10
2.00
11
3.00
12
2.00
13
3.00
14
2.00
15
1.00
16
4.00
17
2.00
18
4.00
19
1.00
Activity
Operation
X
X
40.0
Transport
Inspect
X
60.0
Delay
X
200.0
X
X
X
X
Walk to pharmacy
Pick up prescription
X
20.0
inspects injury
Doctor
patient
5 to ER triage
23.00room
Nurse escorts patient
Return to bed in ER
180.0
Distance
(ft)
60.0
Time
(min)
200.0
Number
of Steps
40.0
Summary
Step Description
45
Process Charts
The annual cost of an entire process can be
estimated
It is the product of:
1) Time in hours to perform the process each time
2) Variable costs per hour
3) Number of times the process is performed each
year
Annual
labor cost
Time to perform
the process in hours
46
Process Charts
If the average time to serve a customer is 4
hours
The variable cost is $25 per hour
And 40 customers are served per year
The total labor cost is:
4 hr/customer $25/hr 40 customers/yr = $4,000
47
Exercise 4:
An automobile service is having
difficulty providing oil changes in the 29
minutes or less mentioned in its
advertising. You are to analyze the
process of changing automobile engine
oil. The subject of the study is the
service mechanic. The process begins
when the mechanic directs the
customers arrival and ends when the
customer pays for the services.
The times add up to 28 minutes, which does not
allow much room for error if the 29-minute guarantee
is to be met and the mechanic travels a total of 420
feet.
48
Step
No.
Time
(min)
Distance
(ft)
0.80
50.0
1.80
2.30
0.80
0.60
0.70
0.90
1.90
0.40
10
0.60
11
4.20
12
0.70
13
2.70
14
1.30
15
0.50
16
1.00
17
3.00
18
0.70
19
0.30
20
0.50
21
2.30
0.30
X
X
X
X
X
50.0
X
X
40.0
7
16.50
8
5.50
Transport
Walk to storeroom
X
70.0
40.0
Walk to pit
X
X
80.0
60.0
X
X
Step Description
49
420
Exercise 5:
What improvement can you make in
the process shown in previous
exercise?
a. Move Step 17 to Step 21. Customers
should not have to wait while the
mechanic cleans the work area.
b. Store small inventories of frequently used
filters in the pit. Steps 7 and 10 involve
travel to the storeroom.
c. Use two mechanics. Steps 10, 12, 15, and
17 involve running up and down the steps
to the pit. Much of this travel could be
eliminated.
50
51
Kanban
Flow
Leveling
Standardized Work
5S
Visual
Pull
Poka Yoke
SMED
Change Management
TPM
VSM
52
Just-In-Time
Jidoka
Involvement:
Start
Here
Standardization
Stability
53
Stability
Improvement is IMPOSSIBLE without stability in the
4 Ms:
o
o
o
o
Man/ woman
Machine
Material
Method
55
56
Looks
Familiar
57
58
59
Life with 5S
60
61
62
63
64
5S
Key Characteristics in a 5S Environment:
o
o
o
o
65
5S (contd)
Major Benefits:
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
66
Exercise 6:
67
5S (contd)
The 5Ss designate:
o Sort - Eliminate what is not needed
o Straighten - A place for everything and everything in its
place
o Shine - Cleaning and looking for ways to keep it clean
o Standardize - Maintain and monitor the first 3 Ss
o Sustain - Stick to the rules
68
5S (contd)
RED TAG STRATEGY
RED TAG
Category
1. Raw material
2. In-process stock
3. Semi-finished goods
4. Finished goods
5. Equipment
Item name
and number
Quantity
Reason
Units
$ Value
1. Not needed
6. Other
2. Defective
3. Not needed soon
4. Scrap material
5. Use unknown
Disposal by:
Disposal method:
1. Discard
Disposal
2. Return
complete
(signature
Disposal date:
ATTACH TO ALL
UNNECESSARY ITEMS
CATEGORIZE
NECESSARY ITEMS:
NECESSARY
SORT
UNNECESSARY
DISCARD
UNNECESSARY
ITEMS
* RARELY USED
* OCCASIONALLY USED
* FREQUENTLY USED
69
5S (contd)
SORT
Check Item
Action
70
5S (contd)
RED TAG
Category
1. Raw material
2. In-process stock
3. Semi-finished goods
4. Finished goods
5. Equipment
Item name
and number
Quantity
Reason
Disposal by:
Disposal method:
Posting date:
Units
$ Value
1. Not needed
6. Other
2. Defective
3. Not needed soon
4. Scrap material
5. Use unknown
Department/Business Unit/Product Center
1. Discard
2. Return
3. Move to red-tag storage site
4. Move to separate storage site
5. Other
Disposal
complete
(signature )
Disposal date:
71
5S (contd)
Before Sort...
After Sort...
72
IDENTIFICATION
LINES
5S (contd)
DETERMINE LOCATION
FOR NEEDED ITEMS
CUTTER
INSERTS
124GF
STRAIGHTEN
POINT OF
USE STORAGE
2HJF
12HJF
12HJF
12HJF 12HJF
12HJF 12HJF
12HJF
12HJF
12HJF
12HJF
12HJF
12HJF
VISUAL LOCATIONS
PW2000 FIXTURES
2A4397
3A9674
2B4659
13
73
5S (contd)
Straighten
Check Item
Action
Tool Board
Machines, equipment
74
5S (contd)
Straighten: Tool Storage
75
5S (contd)
Straighten: Material Storage
76
5S (contd)
Straighten: Maintenance Supplies
77
5S (contd)
Straighten: Common Tooling Storage
78
5S (contd)
Straighten: Cleaning Supplies
79
80
5S (contd)
BUILD PRIDE IN
WORK AREAS
ELIMINATE DIRT
SHINE
(Cleanliness)
SWEEP
BUILD VALUE
IN
EQUIPMENT
CLEANING AS A FORM
OF INSPECTION
CLEAN
81
5S (contd)
Shine
Check Item
Action
Shared areas
Paint, coatings on
buildings, equipment /
machinery and floors
82
5S (contd)
Shine: Covers Prevent Dust
83
5S (contd)
Shine: Clean Walls, Floors, Ceilings
84
5S Examples - Shine
85
5S (contd)
PREVENTIVE:
SORTING
STRAIGHTENING
CLEANLINESS
ASSIGN 3S
RESPONSIBILITIES
NAME
Su
Ken
Sonya
Paul
Ross
Mell
Cathy
Jesse
Roger
Ken D.
Douglas
ASK WHY
STANDARDIZE
INTEGRATE 3S DUTIES
INTO REGULAR WORK DUTIES
CHECK ON 3S
MAINTENANCE LEVEL
5 Minute 5S
5 Point Checklist
1.
2
3.
4.
5.
x x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxx
xxx xx xxxx x x xxxx x xxxxxlsdf lsdkjei lsdkj sdlkj sdl ldf
xx xxxxxx x xxxx x xxxxxxxsdlfkj sdflkj sflkjsdflkj flk
xxxxx xxx x x xxx xxxx xxxxxsdf,j sdlfjk flsdf ljsd
2
3
2
1
4
2.4
3
3
2
3
4
3.0
7:30 - 7:35
1S organize
2S orderliness
3S cleanliness
4S standardize
5S discipline
xxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxx x x xxx x
xx x xx
x xxx x x xxxxx
xxxx x x xxxx x
xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx
86
5S (contd)
5S Guidelines
5S Review Schedule
Standardize
Check Item
Action
Visual Workplace
5S (contd)
5S Guidelines
5S Review Schedule
Standardize (contd)
Check Item
Leaders activity
Action
88
5S (contd)
Standardize Daily Clean Up Plan
NAME
Fri Sat
Ahmad
Moh'd
Basel
Ali
Abdallah
Anas
Tareq
Malek
Haitham
Ayman
89
5S (contd)
Standardize Five Point (Sorting) Check
Description
Points
90
5S (contd)
Standardize Five Point (Straightening) Check
Description
Points
It is possible (but not easy) to tell what goes where and in what
amount.
There are location and item indicators for all tools and gages, as
well as supplies and material.
91
5S (contd)
Standardize Five Point (Cleanliness) Check
Description
Points
92
5S (contd)
Standardize 5S Rating Trend Chart
93
MANAGERS COMMITTED
TO 5S
5S (contd)
PROPER
TRAINING
5S
asdfsdfs
sdf
sdf
dsfsdfsdfsfdsdfsdf
SUSTAIN
CORRECT PROCEDURES
BECOME A HABIT
BUY-IN FROM
ALL WORKERS
94
5S (contd)
Sustain
Check Item
Associate activity
Action
Maintain self-discipline
Complete daily/weekly checklists
Practice until it is a way of life
Continue to improve
95
5S (contd)
Sustain Daily Activities
GRINDER / POLISHER
DAILY PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
Equipment No.: __________________
Maintained by: ___________________
Power Head
Post
Chuck
Splash
Ring
Polishing Wheel
Control Panel
Body
Month: _________________
Day
PROCEDURE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 22
23
24
25
96
26
27
28
29
30
31
1. Sweep area.
2. Remove trash.
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
Weekly
3
1. Clean lights.
1
2
3
2. Mop entire work area.
1
2
3. Clean any soiled area on 3
press and auxiliary
1
equipment.
2
3
4. Restock cleaning
1
supplies.
2
Monthly tasks to be com pleted on the 15th of m onth or next applicable day.
Monthly
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
2nd Week
3rd Week
4th Week
Dec
M o nt hly S c he dule
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1. Sweep area.
2. Remove trash.
3. Mop any soiled areas.
4. Clear aisle ways of any debris.
5.
Weekly
1. Clean lights.
2. Mop entire work area.
3.
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
5S (contd)
Sustain Periodic Reviews
100
5S (contd)
Use 5S Audit Form to continuously assess your current
situation in workplace organization.
Are you in a third-rate workplace, where Associates leave trash
and no one stops to pick it up.
Are you in a second-rate workplace, where Associates leave
trash but others pick it up.
101
5S Example
102
103
104
105
106
107
5S Example
Before 5S
After 5S - Cleaned,
organized and drawers
labeled (less time and
frustration hunting)
108
109
After 5 S: Nokia
110
Visual Management
Visual Management creates an environment in which anyone
can walk into a workplace and visually know the current
situation:
o Visually understand:
workplace organization
the work process
when there is an
abnormality
if they are ahead, behind
or on schedule
HURRY
UP!
P/N 4370168
Due 4/27 Completed
21
HIDDEN WORKPLACE
13
VISUAL WORKPLACE
112
Convey information
Provide immediate feedback
Quickly expose abnormalities in a process
Quickly convey progress or lack of progress
114
Visual Control
o Displays history
o Displays status
o Drives improvement
115
Control Boards
Gauges
Andon (Alarms/ Lights/ Sounds)
Floor markings
Signboards
Color coding
Outlining
Shadow boards (tool cutouts)
Limit lines (min/max height or width)
Arrows
116
Meeting point
118
119
Andon Systems
To enable to see the status of equipment
and teams at a glance and spot problems
immediately.
This timely status allows quick response and
therefore reduced down time.
120
121
122
123
Attendance
chart and
vacation plan
Mission
Status of
suggestions
Awards
received
Names and
pictures of people
Focus item
of the
month
Documents,
reference
books
Customer-supplier
relationship chart
Samples of defects
Plans of action
Improvement
of the month
Quality
Clock
Safety clock
Status of
team projects
124
125
126
127
TPM (contd)
Benefits of TPM to the Company
o Improved plant productivity and capacity
o Lower operating costs
o Improved equipment lifespan
o Better ability to satisfy customers
128
TPM (contd)
Benefits of TPM for Operators & Maintenance
Personnel
o Increased skills through additional training
o Better job satisfaction
Operators More involvement in solving annoying
equipment problems
Maintenance More challenging work
129
TPM (contd)
TPM promotes Shift in Attitudes
Operator
Maintenance
Operator Maintenance
I use
I maintain &
I fix
We maintain
Conventional
TPM
130
TPM (contd)
TPM Emphasizes Prevention
o Three Principles of Prevention:
1) Maintain normal conditions
2) Early discovery of abnormalities
Operator
Maintenance
3) Prompt response
131
TPM (contd)
The Six Big Equipment Losses:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Breakdown losses
Setups and adjustment losses
Idling and minor stoppages
Speed losses
Scrap and rework losses
Start-up losses
132
TPM (contd)
Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) is the way
to measure how effectively machine / equipment
hours are used (Value Adding).
%Performance x
%Quality
Scrap and
rework losses
Speed losses
Start-up losses
133
TPM (contd)
Calculation of LOSSES
Total (Operation) time
e.g. 480 min. (1 shift)
Available time
420 min.
Planned
Downtime
- breaks, planned
maintenance, training
Running time
340 min.
Downtime
- breakdowns, repairs
- setup
- adjustment
Productive time
270 min.
Performance
Losses
Quality Losses
- scrap
- rework
- rejects
Effective time
250 min.
Total losses = 170 min / shift
134
TPM (contd)
Calculation of LOSSES
Available Time Downtime
% Availability = -------------------------------------------------------- x 100
Available Time
TPM (contd)
Calculation of LOSSES
% Quality =
Amount produced Amount defects Amount re-processed
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x 100
Amount produced
OR
% Quality =
Productive Time Quality Losses
-------------------------------------------------------------- x 100
Productive Time
136
TPM (contd)
Calculation of OEE
% Availabilty =
% Performance =
% Quality =
X 100
Available Time
420 min - 80 min
factor 81%
420 min
OEE (in %) =
X
factor 79.4%
X 100
X
factor 92.6%
= 59.6%
137
TPM (contd)
How to increase OEE?
o Data collection is the very important basis to increase OEE
Collect data for all downtime
and losses on the machine
Repairs
Changeover, Adjustments
Make improvements
visible and implement
Analysis
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
Autonomous Mainten.
Preventive Maintenance
Tool change
Changeover reduction
Repair
Minor stoppages
33
26
16
Scrap
Minor Stopp.
Standardize tooling
Scrap, rework
OEE Trend
Target 2003
Improved machine
reliability
Standardisation
Kaizen
J F M A M J J A S O N D
138
TPM (contd)
Making OEE visible by using information boards
Machine Information
OEE trend machine 01
Target 2003
Departement Information
Company Information
Data
J FMAM J J ASOND
J F M A M J J A S O N D
J FMA M J J A SOND
OEE
Productivity
Target 2003
J FMAM J J ASOND
J FMAM J J ASOND
J FMAM J J ASOND
Analysis
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
J F M A M J J A S O N D
other
J FMAM J J ASOND
33
26
16
J F M A M J J A S O N D
139
TPM (contd)
Eliminating Breakdowns
o Workplace Conditions Contribute to Losses
Dirty equipment
Oil and lubricant leaks
Moving parts covered with raw materials or debris
Disorderly wiring, hoses, etc.
Equipment mechanisms hidden or difficult to access
Workplace disorder
A belief that conditions cannot improve
140
TPM (contd)
Eliminating Breakdowns
o Why machines fail
Routine
Accelerated
Design deficiency
141
TPM (contd)
Eliminating Breakdowns
o Two kinds of breakdowns
Function loss (function completely lost)
Function reduction (works, but with loss of speed or
quality)
142
TPM (contd)
Types of Maintenance Programs
1. Reactive Maintenance (Breakdown or Run-to-Failure
Maintenance)
2. Preventive Maintenance (Time-Based Maintenance)
3. Predictive Maintenance (Condition-Based
Maintenance)
4. Autonomous Maintenance
5. Reliability Centered Maintenance (Prevention
Maintenance)
143
TPM (contd)
Reactive Maintenance (Breakdown or Run-toFailure Maintenance)
o
o
o
144
TPM (contd)
Preventive Maintenance (Time-Based
Maintenance)
o
o
o
145
TPM (contd)
Predictive Maintenance (Condition-Based
Maintenance)
o
146
TPM (contd)
Reliability Centered Maintenance (Prevention
Maintenance)
o
o
o
147
TPM (contd)
Autonomous Maintenance
o The principal way production workers participate
in TPM
o Purpose:
Brings production & maintenance people together to slow
routine deterioration and halt accelerated deterioration
Helps operators learn more about their equipment (the
cause and effect)
Prepares operators to be active partners with
maintenance and engineering in improving equipment
performance and reliability
148
TPM (contd)
Steps to Implementing Autonomous Maintenance
1. Initial cleaning and inspection
2. Eliminate sources of contamination and inaccessible areas
3. Develop and test cleaning, inspection, and lubrication
standards
4. General inspection training and inspection procedures
5. Conduct autonomous general inspections
6. Organize and manage the workplace
7. Ongoing autonomous maintenance and continued
improvement
149
TPM (contd)
TPM =
Preventive Maintenance
+ Predictive Maintenance
+ Autonomous Maintenance
150
TPM (contd)
Sustaining TPM
o
o
Audits
Visual activity boards
Team charter
Team activities, goal, schedule, and progress
Cleaning, inspection, and lubrication standards
Workplace organization standards
Trend charts for each of the big 6 losses
Inspection reports
Audit results
Before and after photos
151
TPM (contd)
TPM improves workplace Safety
o
o
o
o
152
TPM (contd)
Setting Up a TPM Structure
EIT
EIT
EIT
TPM
Advisory
Team
EIT
Mgmt
EIT
EIT
EIT = Equipment Improvement
Team
153
TPM (contd)
Advisory Team Responsibilities
o Guide & champion TPM implementation
o Assess current equipment OEE and develop a process for
measuring the 6 Big losses
o Develop a TPM master plan
o Set plant-wide standards for TPM implementation
o Monitor and evaluate progress
o Serve on EITs
154
TPM (contd)
Equipment Improvement Teams Responsibilities
o
o
o
o
155
TPM (contd)
Setting Goals for Your TPM Program
o Short term 12 months
Establish an autonomous maintenance program for x
machines
Increase OEE by y% for individual work centers
156
TPM (contd)
Summary of TPM Stages
1) Stabilize and Restore Equipment
2) Measure Six Big Losses
3) Eliminate Losses
4) Improve Design
157
TPM (contd)
Typical TPM Results
o Overall Equipment Effectiveness(OEE) up 25-65%
o Quality defects down 25-50%
o Maintenance expenditures down 10-50%
o Percent planned vs. unplanned maintenance
increased 10-60%
158
Just-In-Time
Jidoka
Involvement:
Standardization
Stability
159
Standardization
Standardized work is the safest, easiest, and most
effective way of doing the job that we currently know.
It is a tool for developing, confirming, and improving
our method (processes).
A process is simply a set of steps or actions with a
clearly defined goal, which tells the team member
what to do, when to do it, and in what order.
It is important to understand that:
o There is no one best way to do the work.
o Workers should design the work.
o The purpose of standardized work is to provide a basis for
improvement.
160
Standardization (contd)
Why Standardized Work? It provides great benefits:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Process stability.
Clear stop and start points for each process.
Organizational learning.
Audit and problem solving.
Employee involvement.
Baseline for future improvements.
Provides a basis for employee training.
161
Exercise 7:
162
Standardization (contd)
Standardized Work and Continuous Improvement
163
Standardization (contd)
Prerequisites for Standardized Work
o We cannot work to standards when there are
continuous line stoppages and slowdowns.
o Common sources of instability:
164
Standardization (contd)
The Elements of Standardized Work
o Takt time
o Work sequence
o In-process stock
165
Standardization (contd)
Takt time tells our demand frequency, or how
frequently we must produce a product.
Takt =
Daily operating time / Required quantity per day
Takt time differs from Cycle time, which is the actual
time it takes to do the process.
Our Goal is to synchronize takt time and cycle time,
to the greatest extent possible.
166
Standardization (contd)
Work Sequence defines the best way to do each job
action and the proper sequence while meeting the
takt time.
It is very useful to use pictures and drawings to show:
o
o
o
o
o
Proper posture
How the hands and feet should move
How to hold the tools
Accumulated know-how of the job
Critical quality or safety items
167
Standardization (contd)
In-Process Stock (Standard WIP) is the minimum
number of unfinished work pieces required for the
operator to complete the process without standing in
front of a machine.
Defining in-process stock establishes work-in-process
standards per process and makes abnormalities
obvious.
Standard WIP=(Manual Cycle Time + Auto Cycle Time)
Takt Time
168
Standardization (contd)
Main Tools Used to Define Standardized Work:
o Process Capacity Sheet
o Standardized Work Combination Table
o Standardized Work Chart
169
Standardization (contd)
Process Capacity Sheet is used to calculate the
capacity of each machine to confirm true capacity and
to identify and eliminate bottlenecks.
Processing capacity per shift will be calculated as
follows:
o Process Capacity =
170
Standardization (contd)
Process Capacity Sheet
171
Standardization (contd)
Standardized Work Combination Table shows:
o
o
o
o
172
Standardization (contd)
Standardized Work Combination Table
173
Standardization (contd)
Standardized Work Chart shows operator
movement and material location in relation to the
machine and overall process layout.
It should show takt time, work sequence, and
standard WIP.
174
Standardization (contd)
Standardized Work Chart
175
Standardization (contd)
Job Instruction Sheet is used to train new
operations. It lists the steps of the job, detailing any
special skill that may be required to perform the job
safely with utmost quality and efficiency.
It can also be useful for experienced operators to
reconfirm the right operations.
176
Standardization (contd)
Job Instruction Sheet
177
Standardization (contd)
Process Study Sheet is used to define and record
the time for work elements in a process.
The output of this tool goes as input for standardized
work combination table and standardized work chart.
178
Standardization (contd)
Process Study Sheet Steps:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
179
Standardization (contd)
Process Study Sheet
180
Standardization (contd)
Operator Balance Chart helps create continuous
flow in a multi-step, multi-operator process by
distributing operator work elements in a balanced
manner such that the total time is less than or equal
to the takt time.
181
Standardization (contd)
Operator Balance Chart
182
Standardization (contd)
Skills Training Matrix is used to define and measure
the skills and training that your people have vs. the
skills and training they need.
183
Standardization (contd)
Skills Training Matrix
184
Standardization (contd)
Production Analysis Board is a display that must be
located at the exit of the cell (or the line) to show
actual performance compared with planned
performance on an hourly basis.
This tool gives great visibility on the current status
and uncovers problems in order to link then to
corrective actions.
185
Standardization (contd)
Production Analysis Board
186
Standardization (contd)
Production Analysis Board
187
Standardization (contd)
Standardized Work and Kaizen
o Standardized work is a process whose goal is to
identify muda so that we can continually improve
through team member involvement.
o If standardized work does not change, we are
regressing.
o The leaders responsibility is to maintain a good
condition and to improve.
o Where there is no Standard, there can be no
188
Some Evidence Of
Standardized Work Areas
Clear, shiny aisle ways
Color coded areas
Slogans, banners
No work-in-process ( WIP )
One-Piece Flow
Standardized Work Sheets
189
Exercise 8:
190
What is Line
Balancing?
Variation is smoothed
No one overburdened
No one waiting
Everyone working together in a
BALANCED fashion
191
192
193
Overproduction which
causes the other 6
wastes
5 mins
Inventory
Waiting
Transportation
25 mins
15 mins
10 mins
Motion
Constraint
Overburden
This operator
must WAIT for
operator 2
This operator
must WAIT for
operator 3
25
20
mins
15
10
5
Rework
195
15 mins
Reduces
Variation
Minimises the 7
wastes
15 mins
15 mins
10 mins
20
15
10
5
196
Achieve CONSISTENCY in
operations
Standardise
197
Takt Time
Takt is a German word
198
Takt Time
Customer demand = 10 units / month
Total time available = 20 days
Every 2
days
Process 1
Every 2
days
Process 2
Every 2
days
Process 3
Every 2
days
Process 4
Every 2
days
Process 5
Customer
199
Standardise
Standard work layout
Operation
sequence
From:
Cell/ Area
To:
Description:
PPE MUST BE
WORN AT ALL
TIMES
Scale:
stores
Highlight key
information
Work
station 1
Quality check
Part No.
Safety precaution
Tool
cabinet
Work
station 3
Work
station 2
Qty of SIPS
Takt Time
Cycle time
6
Name / position
Date
Name / position
Date
Name / position
200
Date
Standardise
NO
REVISION
DATE PUM
ME
LOCATION:
SHEET..OF
DEPT:
DATE:
OPERATION NO.
PREPARED BY:
WP
NO
P.P.E.
MAIN STEPS
NO
OPERATING DESCRIPTION
JIGS/ TOOLS
OPERATION DESCRIPTION
PEGS REF:
HRS
AUTHORISATION:
TL
TL
TL
KEY POINTS
REQUIRED CHECKS
TIME
PUM
TRAINING COMMENTS
201
ME
Standard Operations
202
203
Current State
Ops
TAKT = 25 hrs
TAKT
Total work
content
Line Balance
Ratio
Line Balance
Efficiency
204
3
25hrs
Why video?
1.
2.
3.
4.
205
1.
2.
3.
COMPANY
PART NAME
STANDARDISED WORK
COMBINATION TABLE
PART NUMBER
PROCESS
WORKING
SEQUENCE
ORIGINATOR
DATE
SECTION
VOLUME
TAKT TIME
OPERATION NAME
TIME
MANUAL
AUTO
WAIT
Fit bracket A
10
Walk to bench
Machine
Inspect
0
2
10
0
10
4
0
5
2
TAKT
SEC
OPERATION TIME
WALK
1
15
2
TOTAL
ISSUER
COORDINATOR
MGR
ISSUER
KEY:
Manual
Auto
CHECKED
Walk
Waiting
206 of 43
206
30
25
20
15
17
15
10
3
Current State
Ops
15 + 30 + 17 = 62 hrs
Takt
25 hrs
Total work
content
62 hrs
Line Balance
Ratio
Line Balance
Efficiency
207
3.
Machining
Treatments
Assembly
Op 2
Op1
2.
4.
i.
ii.
iii.
Main
process
steps
Sub
elements
of work
Number of operators
2 1
5hrs
2 1
5hrs
10hrs
2 1
1hr
1 2
5 hrs
1 2
5 hrs
208
1 2
5 hrs
1 2
5 hrs
2 1
5hrs
3
2
2
1
5hrs
10hrs
5hrs
2 1
1hr
1 2
5 hrs
1 2
5 hrs
TAKT
209
1 2
5 hrs
1 2
5 hrs
30
30
25
20
15
17
15
10
3
Current State
Calculate target
manpower
= 2.48
= 3 operators
Ops
Takt
25 hrs
Total work
content
62 hrs
Line Balance
Ratio
Line Balance
Efficiency
210
30
30
25
20
15
17
15
10
5
Calculate target
manpower
Target
manpower
Current State
= 62 hrs
(3 x 30)
X 100
= 69%
Takt
25 hrs
Stacked
time
62 hrs
Line Balance
Ratio
69%
Line Balance
Efficiency
83%
211
25
20
17
15
30
25
25
20
15
15
10
10
25
12
Target 83%
Efficiency
Example
212
Balance to TAKT
30
30
25
20
17
15
15
10
Update calculations
2.
Can this be
improved?
COMPANY
DATE
ORIGINATOR
CHECKED
PART NAME
SECTION
STANDARDISED
WORK
COMBINATION VOLUME
TABLE
PART NUMBER
PROCESS
TAKT TIME
SEC
TIME
WORKING
OPERATION TIMETAKT
OPERATION
NAME
SEQUENCE
MANUAL
10AUTO
4 WALK
3 WAIT
1
0 0 0
1
Fit bracket2 A10 5 15
10 4 2 2
Walk to bench
1
Machine
Inspect
Yes
No
Complete work
instruction
(standardise) &
implement
TOTAL
ISSUER
COORDINATOR
MGR
ISSUER
3.
KEY:
Manual
Auto
Walk
Waiting
Balance to TAKT
1.
2.
Update calculations
3
2 1
Can this be
improved?
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 1
1hr
1 2
5 hrs
5 hrs
5 hrs
5 hrs
5hrs
Yes
2
2 1
5hrs
10hrs
No
No
Complete work
instruction
(standardise) &
implement
3.
Waste
And dont forget !!
215
Traditional Focus
Work Longer-Harder-Faster
Add People or Equipment
Value
Added
Lean Manufacturing
Waste
LEAD TIME
216
Balance to TAKT
COMPANY
DATE
PART NAME
SECTION
PROCESS
WORKING
SEQUENCE
1
Re-allocate work &
re-balance
OPERATION NAME
Fit bracket A
TIME
MANUAL AUTO
WAIT
Walk to bench 0
0
2 10
Machine
10 4
Inspect
0
5
2
10
SEC
OPERATION TIME
WALK
1
15
2
Yes
No
No
Complete work
instruction
(standardise) &
implement
TOTAL
ISSUER
COORDINATOR
MGR
ISSUER
KEY:
Manual
Auto
CHECKED
VOLUME
TAKT TIME
Update calculations
Can this be
improved?
STANDARDISED WORK
COMBINATION TABLE
PART NUMBER
ORIGINATOR
Walk
Waiting
217 of 43
217
TAKT
Update calculations
Can this be
improved?
No
No
Complete work
instruction
(standardise) &
implement
Yes
30
25
20
15
10
Update calculations
Can this be
improved?
Yes
No
No
Complete work
instruction
(standardise) &
implement
219
30
25
20
15
10
5
Update calculations
Can this be
improved?
Yes
No
No
Complete work
instruction
(standardise) &
implement
Attack the
red,
redistribute
the green !!
Future State
Ops
Takt
27 hrs
Stacked
time
57 hrs
Line Balance
Ratio
Line Balance
Efficiency
220
25
20
15
10
5
Update calculations
30
25
Can this be
improved?
No
No
Complete work
instruction
(standardise) &
implement
Yes
20
Operator freed
up for other
process or
improvement
team
15
10
5
221
30
Future State
25
Ops
20
15
Takt
25 hrs
Total work
content
44 hrs
10
5
Update calculations
1
Can this be
improved?
No
No
Complete work
instruction
(standardise) &
implement
Yes
= 44 hrs
(2 x 24)
= 44 hrs
(2 x 25)
Line Balance
Ratio
X 100
X 100
= 92%
Line Balance
Efficiency
= 88%
222
92%
88%
Act
Plan
Check
C D
Do
Continuously use
waste elimination tools
Update calculations
Yes
Can this be
improved?
No
Complete work
instruction
(standardise) &
implement
Value
Added
Waste
LEAD TIME
223
Method - Standardise
Standard work layout
Operation
sequence
From:
Cell/ Area
To:
Description:
PPE MUST BE
WORN AT ALL
TIMES
Part No.
Scale:
Tool
cabinet
stores
Tool
cabinet
Highlight key
information
Work
station 1
Quality check
Safety precaution
Work
station 3
Work
station 2
Qty of SIPS
Takt Time
Cycle time
6
Name / position
Date
Name / position
Date
Name / position
224
Date
Method - Standardise
NO
REVISION
DATE Mgr
ME
LOCATION:
SHEET..OF
DEPT:
DATE:
OPERATION NO.
PREPARED BY:
WP
NO
P.P.E.
MAIN STEPS
NO
OPERATING DESCRIPTION
JIGS/ TOOLS
OPERATION DESCRIPTION
PEGS REF:
HRS
AUTHORISATION:
TL
TL
TL
KEY POINTS
REQUIRED CHECKS
TIME
PUM
TRAINING COMMENTS
225
ME
Visual Management
The new line balance chart should be
displayed on the cell
The impact of changes in resource or
Takt on operator cycle times can be
seen instantly
Opportunities for Kaizen activities can
be easily identified
226
Summary
Balance to TAKT & eliminate waste
Balance to TAKT
Current State
Operators
Takt
62 hrs
Line Balance
Efficiency
69%
Line Balance
Ratio
Future State
Break down the
work elements
25 hrs
Total work
content
83%
5hrs
Calculate target
manpower
Update calculations
Can this
Can
this be
improved?
be
improved?
Yes
Ops
Takt
25 hrs
Total work
content
44 hrs
Line Balance
Ratio
92%
Line Balance
Efficiency
No
Calculate Line
Balance Ratio &
Efficiency
Complete work
instruction
(standardise) &
implement
227
88%
Just-In-Time
Jidoka
Involvement:
Standardization
Stability
228
230
JIT (contd)
Kanban is a signaling device that gives authorization and
instructions for the production or withdrawal (conveyance) of
items in a pull system.
Usually, it is a card in a rectangular vinyl envelope.
It contains information such as: part name, part number, external
supplier or internal supplying process, pack-out quantity, storage
address, and consuming process address.
231
JIT (contd)
There are two kinds of Kanban:
o Production Kanban, which specifies the kind and quantity of
product that the upstream process (supplier) must produce.
o Withdrawal Kanban, which specifies the kind and quantity of
product that the downstream process (customer) may withdraw.
Production Card
Withdrawal Card
Customer
Process
Supplying
Process
product
product
JIT (contd)
Production Leveling (Heijunka) means distributing the
production volume and mix evenly over time.
Heijunka balances the workload in production such that it
achieves the best possible utilization of people and equipment
without straining them while effectively responding to continuous
changes in customer demand.
Heijunka requires quick changeovers.
233
JIT (contd)
Heijunka Example: Instead of producing all medium tractors then all
small tractors then all large tractors throughout the week, level
production such that you would alternate small batches of the three
sizes during each day.
Traditional Production
Leveled Production
234
JIT (contd)
Heijunka Box is a tool used to level the mix and
volume of production by distributing kanban within a
facility at fixed intervals.
235
JIT (contd)
SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die) is a process
for changing over production equipment from one part
number to another in as little time as possible.
Benefits of SMED:
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Increased flexibility
Elimination of waiting
Operators preference
Stockless production
236
JIT (contd)
SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die) is a method for
systematically reducing setup and retooling times.
With shorter setup times, a machine that was a bottleneck
(constraint) can yield additional production capacity.
Alternatively, more frequent changeovers at constant capacity
can reduce inventory ahead of and following the machine.
Slow changeover
due to poor
positioning of dies
Quick changeover
237
JIT (contd)
SMED key definitions:
o Changeover (Setup) is the process of switching from the
production of one product or part number to another in a machine
(e.g., a stamping press or molding machine) or a series of linked
machines (e.g., an assembly line or cell) by changing parts, dies,
molds, fixtures, etc.
o Changeover time is measured as the time elapsed between the
last piece in the run just completed and the first good piece from
the process after the changeover.
o Internal step is a step which can be done only when a machine is
stopped (such as inserting a new die).
o External step is a step that can be performed while the machine is
running (such as transporting the new die to the machine).
238
JIT (contd)
SMED is performed in six steps:
239
JIT (contd)
Traditional Flow (Batch and Queue)
o A mass production approach to operations in which large lots
(batches) of items are processed and moved (pushed) to the
next processregardless of whether they are actually
neededwhere they wait in a line (a queue).
Process
A
Process
B
10 minutes
Process
C
10 minutes
10 minutes
240
JIT (contd)
Continuous Flow (One-Piece Flow)
o Producing and moving one item at a time (or a small and
consistent batch of items) through a series of processing
steps as continuously as possible, with each step making just
what is requested by the next step.
241
JIT (contd)
Push Systems and Pull Systems
o Production quantity
is determined based
on demand
estimates and
current inventories
242
JIT (contd)
There are 3 Types of Pull Systems
o Supermarket Pull System
o Sequential Pull System
243
JIT (contd)
Supermarket Pull System
o The most basic and widespread type, also known as a fill-up or
replenishment pull system.
o In a supermarket pull system each process has a store -- a
supermarket -- that holds an amount of each product it produces.
244
JIT (contd)
Supermarket Pull System
245
JIT (contd)
Sequential Pull System
o Used when there are too many part numbers to hold inventory of
each in a supermarket.
o Products are essentially made-to-order while overall system
inventory is minimized.
o Scheduling department must set the right mix and quantity of
products to be produced. This can be done by placing production
kanban cards in a heijunka box, often at the beginning of each shift.
o A sequential system requires strong management to maintain, and
improving it may be a challenge on the shop floor.
o Works best when order frequency is low and customer lead times is
long (e.g. custom producers).
246
JIT (contd)
Sequential Pull System
247
JIT (contd)
Mixed Pull System
o Mixed pull system is a combination of supermarket and sequential
pull systems running in parallel.
o Often an analysis is performed to segment part numbers by volume
into (A) high, (B) medium, (C) low, and (D) infrequent orders.
o High frequency orders are put through the supermarket system.
o Low frequency orders are put through the sequential system.
o Works best for manufacturers producing both high and low
frequency items.
248
JIT (contd)
Mixed Pull System
249
Just-In-Time
Jidoka
Involvement:
Standardization
Stability
250
Jidoka
Jidoka Automation with a human touch means
providing machines and operators the ability to detect
when an abnormal condition has occurred and
immediately stop work.
This enables operations to build in quality at each
process and to separate operators and machines for
more efficient work.
251
Jidoka (contd)
Jidoka highlights the causes of problems because
work stops immediately when a problem first occurs.
This leads to improvements in the processes that
build in quality by eliminating the root causes of
defects.
The evolution toward Jidoka:
automatic
feed
automatic
feed
andon light
automatic
ejection
Self-monitoring
machine
252
Jidoka (contd)
Poka-Yoke (Mistake-proofing) or (Error-proofing)
means implementing simple low-cost devices that
either detect abnormal situations or stop the line to
prevent defects.
Poka-Yoke reduce workers physical and mental
burden by eliminating the need to constantly check
for the common errors that leads to defects.
253
Jidoka (contd)
Some of the most common errors:
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
254
Jidoka (contd)
A good Poka-Yoke satisfies the following:
o
o
o
o
255
Jidoka (contd)
When a Poka-Yoke detects an error, there are two
types of action:
o Shutdown: These are the most powerful Poka-Yokes. For
example, a light sensor stops a drilling operation when it
fails to detect the requisite number of holes in the work
piece.
o Warning: These alert us to abnormalities by activating a
buzzer or light. For example, the andon boards alerts the
group leader to problems by lighting the process number,
playing a piece of music, or both.
Simple Andon
Complex Andon
256
Jidoka (contd)
Poka-Yoke examples from daily life:
257
Jidoka (contd)
Poka-Yoke examples in manufacturing
Elimination
Detection
258
Jidoka (contd)
Poka-Yoke examples in manufacturing
Detection
Detection
259
Kanban
Flow
Leveling
Standardized Work
5S
Visual
Pull
Lean
Starts
with VSM
Poka Yoke
SMED
Change Management
TPM
VSM
260
261
262
263
264
265
F E D C B A
Products
A Product
Family
266
Process Level
Single Plant
(Door-to-door)
Multiple Plants
Across Companies
267
268
269
o Inventory
WIP Number of units waiting to be worked on or waiting to
be moved.
Finished Goods Number of units in stores or waiting to be
shipped.
270
271
Overall Flow
o Process Lead Time The time for a unit to make it all the way
through the process
(Sum of Inventory Days) + (Sum of Cycle Times)
272
273
274
INVENTORY ICONS
WITH PUSH ARROWS
Material Flow
275
276
277
278
279
280
Supplier/
Customer
C/T=45 sec.
C/O=30 min.
3 Shifts.
2% Scrap
300 pieces
1 day
Data Box
Inventory
Supermarket
Mon
+ Wed
Shipment
FIFO
Push
Physical
Pull
Finished Goods
to Customer
First-In-First-Out
Flow
281
Manual
Information Flow
Kanban Arriving in
Batches
Electronic
Information Flow
Withdrawal
Kanban
Weekly
Schedule
OXOX
Schedule
Load
Leveling Box
Production
Kanban
Sequenced-Pull
Ball
Signal
Kanban
282
Kanban
Post
Operator
Kaizen
Lightning Burst
Buffer or
Safety Stock
Go See
Production
Schedule
283
18,400 pcs/mo
-12,000 L
-6,400 R
Tray=20 pcs.
2 Shifts
284
State St.
Assembly
18,400 pcs/mo
-12,000 L
-6,400 R
Tray=20 pcs.
Stamping
Coils
5 days
S. Weld # 1
4600 L
2400 R
S. Weld # 2
1100L
600 R
Assy # 1
1600 L
850 R
2 Shifts
Assy # 2
1200 L
640R
2700 L
1440 R
CT=1sec.
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
CT=39sec
.Co=10 min.
Uptime=100%
CT=46sec
.Co=10 min.
Uptime=80%
CT=62sec
Co=0
.
Uptime=100%
CT=40sec
.Co=0
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
285
Shipping
Michigan
State St.
Assembly
Steel Co.
18,400 pcs/mo
-12,000 L
-6,400 R
Tray=20 pcs.
Tues &
Thurs.
2 Shifts
Stamping
Coils
5 days CT=1sec.
Co=1 hr.
S. Weld # 1
S. Weld # 2
1100L
600 R
4600 L
2400 R
Uptime=85%
27,600 sec. avail
EPE=2 weeks
Assy # 1
1600 L
850 R
1X
Daily
Assy # 2
2700 L
1440 R
1200 L
640R
CT=39sec
.Co=10 min.
CT=46sec
.Co=10 min.
CT=62sec
Co=0
.
CT=40sec
.Co=0
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
Uptime=80%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
Shipping
287
Fourth - show
Information Flows
& Push Arrows
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Michigan
Daily
Order
Steel Co.
State St.
Assembly
18,400 pcs/mo
-12,000 L
-6,400 R
Tray=20 pcs.
2 Shifts
Tues &
Thurs.
1X
Daily
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
4600 L
2400 R
CT=1sec.
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
27,600 sec. avail
EPE=2 weeks
S. Weld # 2
I
1100R
600 R
CT=39sec
.Co=10 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
Assy # 1
CT=46sec
.Co=10 min.
Uptime=80%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
1600 L
850 R
Assy # 2
I
Shipping
I
2700 L
1200 L
1440 R
CT=62sec
640R CT=40sec
Co=0
.
.Co=0
Uptime=100%
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
27,600 sec.avail
289
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Michigan
State St.
Assembly
Daily
Order
Steel Co.
18,400 pcs/mo
-12,000 L
-6,400 R
Tray=20 pcs.
2 Shifts
Tues &
Thurs.
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
4600 L
2400 R
5
days
CT=1sec.
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
27,600 sec. avail
EPE=2 weeks
1
sec
S. Weld # 2
Assy # 1
1100R
600 R
CT=39sec
.Co=10 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
7.6 days
CT=46sec
.Co=10 min.
Uptime=80%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
1.8 days
39 sec
Shipping
1600 L
850 R CT=62sec
Co=0
.
1200 L
640R CT=40sec
.Co=0
Uptime=100%
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
27,600 sec.avail
2.7 days
46 sec
Assy # 2
2 days
62 sec
40 sec
2700 L
1440 R
(PLT)
4.5 days=23.6 days
(PT)
=188 sec
Complete VSM
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Michigan
State St.
Assembly
Daily
Order
Steel Co.
18,400 pcs/mo
-12,000 L
-6,400 R
Tray=20 pcs.
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
2 Shifts
Tues &
Thurs.
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
4600 L
2400 R
5
days
CT=1sec.
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
27,600 sec. avail
EPE=2 weeks
1
sec
S. Weld # 2
Assy # 1
1100R
600 R
CT=39sec
.Co=10 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
7.6 days
CT=46sec
.Co=10 min.
Uptime=80%
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
1.8 days
39 sec
Shipping
1600 L
850 R CT=62sec
Co=0
.
1200 L
640R CT=40sec
.Co=0
Uptime=100%
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2 shifts
27,600 sec.avail
27,600 sec.avail
2.7 days
46 sec
Assy # 2
2 days
62 sec
40 sec
2700 L
1440 R
(PLT)
4.5 days=23.6 days
(PT)
=188 sec
292
o
o
293
Overproduction
Waiting
Transportation
Unnecessary Processing
Inventory
Unnecessary Motion
Correction
294
Waiting
o An operator waiting for a long machine cycle to end
Transportation
o Moving parts and products does not add value - it just adds
cost
295
Inventory
o There is a cost to the Company for carrying inventory
o There is always the risk that it can become obsolete
o It covers up other inefficiencies
e.g. Long set-up times
Unnecessary Motion
o Any motion of a person that does not add value
Operators / Setters looking for tooling
296
297
298
300
Long set-ups
Large distances
Downtime problems
Long lead-times
301
o Two-bin
Bins used to regulate production
o Buffer stock
Standard work
Curtain operation
o Supermarket
Controlled quantity of inventory
Visual controls
Owned by the supplier
302
Production KANBAN
Withdrawal KANBAN
Supplying
Process
Customer
Process
PRODUCT
Supermarket
1) CUSTOMER
303
304
schedule
305
306
Suppliers
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Order Entry
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Orders/day
= 36
Queue
= 1.5 Days
Customer
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342
CT=1sec
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
1 shift
5 days
Assembly
Test
I
81
CT=3 min
Co=10 min.
Uptime=70%
1 shift
7.6 days
1 sec
1.8 days
3 min
90
202
CT= 67 min
Co= 23 min
CT= 4 min
Co=0
FTY = 67%
2 shifts
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2.7 days
15 min
122
CT= 15 min
Co=0 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
Shipping
4.5 days
67 min
Lead Time
=23.6 days
Touch Time
= 89 min
2 days
4 min
Customer Data
On-Time Delivery
Demand = 45/day
Takt Time = 18.2 min
Competitive LT = 3 days
Suppliers
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Order Entry
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Orders/day
= 36
Queue
= 1.5 Days
Customer
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342
CT=1sec
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
1 shift
5 days
Assembly
Test
I
81
CT=3 min
Co=10 min.
Uptime=70%
1 shift
7.6 days
1 sec
1.8 days
3 min
90
202
CT= 67 min
Co= 23 min
CT= 4 min
Co=0
FTY = 67%
2 shifts
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2.7 days
15 min
122
CT= 15 min
Co=0 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
Shipping
4.5 days
67 min
Lead Time
=23.6 days
Touch Time
= 89 min
2 days
4 min
Inventory
Raw = 5 days
WIP = 12.1 days
FG = 6.5 days
Suppliers
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Order Entry
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Orders/day
= 36
Queue
= 1.5 Days
Customer
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342
CT=1sec
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
1 shift
5 days
Assembly
Test
I
81
CT=3 min
Co=10 min.
Uptime=70%
1 shift
7.6 days
1 sec
1.8 days
3 min
90
202
CT= 67 min
Co= 23 min
CT= 4 min
Co=0
FTY = 67%
2 shifts
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2.7 days
15 min
122
CT= 15 min
Co=0 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
Shipping
4.5 days
67 min
Lead Time
=23.6 days
Touch Time
= 89 min
2 days
4 min
Flow of Value
Lead Time
Suppliers
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Order Entry
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Orders/day
= 36
Queue
= 1.5 Days
Customer
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342
CT=1sec
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
1 shift
5 days
Assembly
Test
I
81
CT=3 min
Co=10 min.
Uptime=70%
1 shift
7.6 days
1 sec
1.8 days
3 min
90
202
CT= 67 min
Co= 23 min
CT= 4 min
Co=0
FTY = 67%
2 shifts
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2.7 days
15 min
122
CT= 15 min
Co=0 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
Shipping
4.5 days
67 min
Lead Time
=23.6 days
Touch Time
= 89 min
2 days
4 min
Constraints
OTD, Lead Time
Suppliers
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Order Entry
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Orders/day
= 36
Queue
= 1.5 Days
Customer
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342
CT=1sec
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
1 shift
5 days
Assembly
Test
I
81
CT=3 min
Co=10 min.
Uptime=70%
1 shift
7.6 days
1 sec
1.8 days
3 min
90
202
CT= 67 min
Co= 23 min
CT= 4 min
Co=0
FTY = 67%
2 shifts
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2.7 days
15 min
122
CT= 15 min
Co=0 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
Shipping
4.5 days
67 min
Lead Time
=23.6 days
Touch Time
= 89 min
2 days
4 min
Setup Times
OP Margin, Lead Time
CO = 1 hour
CO = 23 min
CO =
Suppliers
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
Changeover
MRP
Order Entry
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Orders/day
= 36
Queue
= 1.5 Days
Customer
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342
CT=1sec
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
1 shift
5 days
Assembly
Test
I
81
CT=3 min
Co=10 min.
Uptime=70%
1 shift
7.6 days
1 sec
1.8 days
3 min
90
202
CT= 67 min
Co= 23 min
CT= 4 min
Co=0
FTY = 67%
2 shifts
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2.7 days
15 min
122
CT= 15 min
Co=0 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
Shipping
4.5 days
67 min
Lead Time
=23.6 days
Touch Time
= 89 min
2 days
4 min
Maintenance
OTD, Lead Time
Uptime = 70%
Suppliers
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Order Entry
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Orders/day
= 36
Queue
= 1.5 Days
Customer
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342
CT=1sec
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
1 shift
5 days
Assembly
Test
I
81
CT=3 min
Co=10 min.
Uptime=70%
1 shift
7.6 days
1 sec
1.8 days
3 min
90
202
CT= 67 min
Co= 23 min
CT= 4 min
Co=0
FTY = 67%
2 shifts
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2.7 days
15 min
122
CT= 15 min
Co=0 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
Shipping
4.5 days
67 min
Lead Time
=23.6 days
Touch Time
= 89 min
2 days
4 min
Quality
FTY = 67%
Suppliers
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Order Entry
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Orders/day
= 36
Queue
= 1.5 Days
Customer
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342
CT=1sec
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
1 shift
5 days
Assembly
Test
I
81
CT=3 min
Co=10 min.
Uptime=70%
1 shift
7.6 days
1 sec
1.8 days
3 min
90
202
CT= 67 min
Co= 23 min
CT= 4 min
Co=0
FTY = 67%
2 shifts
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2.7 days
15 min
122
CT= 15 min
Co=0 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
Shipping
4.5 days
67 min
Lead Time
=23.6 days
Touch Time
= 89 min
2 days
4 min
Flow of Value
OTD, Lead Time
Suppliers
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
Production
Control
6 WEEK
Forecast
MRP
Order Entry
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Orders/day
= 36
Queue
= 1.5 Days
Customer
1X
Daily
I
Coils
5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342
CT=1sec
Co=1 hr.
Uptime=85%
1 shift
5 days
Assembly
Test
I
81
CT=3 min
Co=10 min.
Uptime=70%
1 shift
7.6 days
1 sec
1.8 days
3 min
90
202
CT= 67 min
Co= 23 min
CT= 4 min
Co=0
FTY = 67%
2 shifts
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
2.7 days
15 min
122
CT= 15 min
Co=0 min.
Uptime=100%
2 shifts
Shipping
4.5 days
67 min
Lead Time
=23.6 days
Touch Time
= 89 min
2 days
4 min
316
317
Waiting
Inbox
1 Day
1/2 Day at
meeting
1 Day
318
Poor workplace
Duplication:
Organization
Many Signatures
State Street
Assembly
Customer
Re-enter Data:
Legacy System
Incomplete Data
319
Michigan Steel
Customer
Company
EmailO
rder
Engineering
database
Central
database
Phone
Clarification
Phone
Clarification
Email
Quote
Design
Log file
Phone
Clarification
Email /
voicemail
I
4 Estimates Meeting
.5 hours 3 hours
.5 hr
3 hr
1 Day .5 Day
10 min
Inbox
I
2 files
1 Day
Waiting
Eng.
Review
w
1 Eng.
1 Day
Inbox
I
1/2 Day
7 files
Purchasing 1 Day
quote
1 Sales Rep
.5 Day 1 Day
4 hrs
3 files
1 Day
Email Clarification
Inbox
Manf.
Eng.
3 hrs
Outbox Waiting
w
4 files Clarify
1 Day 1 Day
Inbox
Quote
Prep
I
2 files
1 Day
1 sales Rep
60 min
Total 10 Days
20 min
(STEP 6)
o Designing a Lean Flow
You always need a future state
Use pencil, update regularly, 70%
correct is fine
Basis for work plan - blueprint
Begin by drawing a current state
1st iteration assumes using
existing equipment, only minor
purchases
Use the list of future state
questions
Product Family
Current State
Drawing
Future State
Drawing
Plan &
Implementation
321
322
The cost of holding some finished goods may well be less than
the cost of extra capacity
323
324
326
327
328
8
Type
A
8.10
8.20
Kanban
card A
Type
B
Type
C
8.30
8.40
8.50
Kanban
card A
Kanban
card B
9.00
9.10
Kanban
card A
Kanban
card B
Kanban
card C
Kanban
card B
Kanban
card C
329
8.10
8.20
Kanban
card A
Type
Type
8.50
9.00
Kanban
card B
Kanban
card C
Drop Kanban
9.10
Kanban
card A
Kanban
card B
Kanban
card C
at process
8.40
Kanban
card A
Kanban
card B
8.30
Customer
requirement
Pick up
next
kanban
Pacemaker
process
Pick up one
finished
quantity
Move finished
parts to
supermarket
Shipping
Equipment
Procedures
Changeover time
Yield
Cycle time
331
332
State St.
Assembly
18,400 pcs/mo
-12,000 L
-6,400 R
Tray=20 pcs.
2 Shifts
Stamping
Weld& Assy
1X
Daily
L
Takt=60 sec.
C/T=56 sec.
Shipping
Staging
C/O= 0
Uptime=100%l
2 shifts
333
334
336
State St.
Assembly
PRODUCTION
CONTROL
Daily
Order
18,400 pcs/mo
coil
coil
-12,000 L
-6,400 R
Tray=20 pcs.
1X
Daily
2 Shifts
batch
20
bin
Coils
Weld& Assy
Stamping
1X
Daily
L
(at the press)
1.5 days
Takt=60 sec.
C/T=56 sec.
C/O= 0
Uptime=100%l
2 shifts
Shipping
Staging
338
Production
Control
Daily Orders
bin
bin
bin
OXOX
WELD&ASSY
bin
Shipping
Staging
339
90/60/30 day
Forecasts
PRODUCTION
CONTROL
State St.
Assembly
Daily
Order
Daily
Order
18,400 pcs/mo
coil
-12,000 L
coil
Daily order
-6,400 R
Tray=20 pcs.
20
1X
Daily
20
batch
OXOX
20
bin
2 Shifts
20
Coils
Weld& Assy
Stamping
change
over
EPE= 1 shift.
EPE <10 min..
(at the press)
1.5 days
1.5 days
1X
Daily
Welder
uptime
Takt=60 sec.
C/T=56 sec.
C/O= 0
Uptime=100%l
2 shifts
Staging
Weld
change
over
Shipping
1 day
1 sec.
168 sec
o Do 5S
o Break the implementation into steps
Break your future state into loops
Each loop contains the flow up to and including a
supermarket
341
Stamping
Loop
Pacemaker Loop
344
345
Assy
Stamping
Coils
Suggestions:
- Review walking the flow
- Concentrate on the problems
347
348
349
Lean Management
Implementation Methodology
Select Value Streams
for the year
Develop Rapid
Improvement Plan
RIP consists of three
types of events
Rapid Improvement
Events (RIE)
Executive Planning
Session (EPS)
Value Stream
Analysis (VSA)
Organization
Assessment
Rapid
Improvement Plan
(RIP)
Projects
Just-Do-Its
350
These sessions:
o Can take up to 2 days.
o Conducted with Executive Leadership, Lean
Deployment Team members, and a consultant.
351
353
354
355
Current State
Map
Future State
Map
Improvement
Plan
357
358
359
360
Organization Assessment
It is a comprehensive examination of results
achieved, Lean deployment, and Lean
maturity of the organization.
361
Module 4
Lean Cultural
Issues and
Kaizen
362
363
Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA).
Standardization.
Visual Management.
Teamwork.
Paradox.
364
365
366
367
Safety first.
Employment security.
Same uniforms for all (even executives).
No executive offices and no walls.
No executive dining rooms or parking spaces.
Genchi Genbutsu, the Go and see for yourself spirit.
368
Disciplined
Freewheeling
Warm
Determined
do this better?
Respect for people creates pleasing warmth.
370
371
Historical Introduction
Kaizen Has Japanese roots
The main founders Kaizen and Lean
manufacturing are Taiichi Ohno & Shigeo
Shingo
372
Historical Introduction
Masaaki Imai is the
author of two
popular books
Kaizen 1984
Gemba Kaizen
1997
373
Historical Introduction
Basis of Japanese Management:
374
Historical Introduction
Kaizen came out at a time when other related
ideas were popular:
Lean Management
Creative Thinking
375
Historical Introduction
We breath
Kaizen at
Toyota
Toyota President
376
Kaizen
377
Kaizen
A culture of sustained continuous improvement
Eliminate waste in systems and processes
378
Exercise 9:
379
Gemba Kaizen
380
381
NVA
383
384
385
Kaikaku
Inexpensive
Can be expensive
386
387
388
Pareto Diagram
389
Material from
Supplier
No,
continue
Inspect
for Defects
Defects
found?
Yes
Return
materials
390
391
Check Sheets
392
393
Histogram
Graphically shows the process capability and, if
desired, the relationship to the specifications
and the nominal
394
Scatter Diagram
The simplest way to determine if a cause
and-effect relationship exists between two
variables
395
80
Sample
Value
UCL
60
40
Average
20
LCL
0
1
13
17
21
Time
396
397
Benchmarking
Benchmarking concept
What are others
Performance levels?
How did they get there?
What is our
Performance level?
How do we do it?
Creative
Adaptation
Breakthrough
Performance
398
Brainstorming
Two rules:
1- No Judgment on any idea
2- We care about quantity not quality of ideas
399
400
Affinity Diagram
401
Tree Diagram
402
403
404
Quality Circles
Group of 6-12 employees from same
work area
Meet regularly to solve work-related
problems
o 4 hours/month
Facilitator trains
& helps with
meetings
405
Kaizen Implementation
406
Kaizen Cycle
Start Here
Do It Again
Document
Reality
Celebrate
Identify
Waste
Make this
the
Standard
Plan
Countermeasures
Reality
Check
Measure
Results
KaizenVerify
Make
Changes
Change
407
408
409
Employees Suggestions
410
1. Document
Reality
2. Identify
Waste
3. Plan
Countermeasures
9. Celebrate
8. Make this
the Standard
Measurable,
Sustainable
Improvement to Key
Business Performance
Metrics.
A new way of life!
7. Measure
Results
6. Verify Change
4. Reality
Check
5. Make Changes
412
OEM
Product Selection
& Ordering
Product Selection
Stocking POU
Customer Assistance
Ordering/Quoting
Specfication
Customer Assistance
Ordering/Quoting
Specfication
Specfications, Bill of
Materials, Routings,
Machine Software
Order Collection
Order Entry
Customer Assistance
Order Collection
Order Entry
Customer Assistance
Order Management
Customer Information
Sales & Shipping
Order Management
Customer Information
Sales & Shipping
Set Objectives
Prioritize Opportunities
Document Reality
RGOS
Pareto Analysis
3.
OMS
1.
Planning/Purchasing
MPS/MRP/CMMS
Production/Material
Control/Cost/BOM
Ship to
Whse
Ship Direct
Shop Order Mg
Labor & Cost, Inv
ID, MFG, Assem
8.
9.
4.
Setup Checklist
Format hard drive
Create boot disk
Edit BIOS
Boot from CDrom
Install Windows
Set date and time
Measure Progress
7.
Correlation and
Regression
6.
Plan Countermeasures
Week 1
M T WT F M T WT F M T WT F
Week 2
Week 3
5.
Project Phase I
Database Debug
Project Phase II
Team Kaizen
Project Management - Gantt Chart
M T W T F M T W T F M T W T F
Development
Refine Schedules
Error Proofing
* *
*
*
* * *
Agree on Goals
Define Performance
Metrics
414
415
416