Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jomtien Palm Beach Hotel and Resort, Pattaya City, Thailand, 19-21 March 2014
I. NOMENCLATURE
Nbus
Vref
Ns
Sj
Soj
Pi
Qi
Vi
Yij
i
Nbr
vidk , xidk
k
c1 ,c2
max , min
r1 , r2
pbest idk
gbestidk
ki
distribution,
local best particle i in dimension d of iteration
k,
global best particle i in dimension d of
iteration k,
Status of ith branchs switch
II. INTRODUCTION
International Conference and Utility Exhibition 2014 on Green Energy for Sustainable Development (ICUE 2014)
Jomtien Palm Beach Hotel and Resort, Pattaya City, Thailand, 19-21 March 2014
1. Solar generation:
For this work, a typical daily solar PV generation curve for
a clear sky condition is considered for estimation of PV output
for a given day as shown in Fig. 2. It is assumed that the PVbased DG of 1.5 MW capacity is installed at bus 16 in the
IEEE 33-bus system.
2. Wind generation:
Likewise, a typical daily wind power generation curve is
considered as shown in Fig. 3. For practical purpose, such
curve may be derived from statistical analysis of the
historical data for average wind speed. Here, it is assumed
that a 0.8 MW wind powered DG is installed at bus 30.
A. Demand Evaluation
In this work, a typical average load profile is assumed
based on load forecast and the historical data for the daily
demand curve as shown in Fig. 1. The load at each of the six
time frames is considered to be constant and equal to the
maximum load at that time frame to consider the worst case
condition. Real time measurements may then be used to
forecast load and further approximate the load to the mostly
likely load value from the demand curve. At the beginning of
each period, the optimal configuration for the next period is
determined.
B. DG Profile
In this paper, it has been assumed that all DGs are of small
scale range connected to the system at medium voltage and
operated at unity power factor for economic reasons. Like in
the case of load profile, the DG profile is considered for a 24
hour duration, which is divided into the same six time frames.
The DG generation output for each time frame is considered to
be the average output for that time frame.
N br
i =1
plossi =
N br
k .R . I
i =1
2
i
(1)
International Conference and Utility Exhibition 2014 on Green Energy for Sustainable Development (ICUE 2014)
Jomtien Palm Beach Hotel and Resort, Pattaya City, Thailand, 19-21 March 2014
i= 1, 2, Nbr
ki = 0, (if ith branch is open) and
ki = 1, (if ith branch is closed)
2. Minimization of voltage deviation
The second objective is to minimize the maximum voltage
deviation in any of the given bus after reconfiguration as
formulated in (2)
Minimize f2(x) = max V min {V } , V max {V }
ref
i
ref
i
(2)
NS
S
i
S oj
X i= [X i ,1 , X i , 2 , X i ,d X i , D ]
(9)
Where,
D = Total number of loops in the network,
Xi = vector of switch indices for ith particle
(3)
Where,
Sj = 0, (if jth switch is open) and
Sj = 1, (if jth switch is closed)
B. Technical Constraints
1. Power balance
N bus
Pi Vi . V j .Yij , cos( i j ij ) = 0
(4)
j =1
N bus
Qi Vi . V j .Yij sin( i j ij ) = 0
(5)
j =1
Where,
i= 1, 2, Nbus,
2. Bus voltage operating limit
All bus voltages should be within the specified operational
limit after reconfiguration in order to ensure stability and
power quality, as formulated in (6).
V min Vi V max
i= 1, 2, Nbus
(6)
ki . I i I
max
i
i= 1, 2, Ns
(7)
The dth element of the particle Xi must belong to the dth loop
or mesh.
Only one switch from a branch string or vector common to
any two loops can be opened. For instance, only one switch
from vector L12 or L13 can be opened at a time as in Fig. 4.
Likewise, only one switch from a continuous branch string
or vector between any two nodes can be opened. For
example, only one switch from vector L33 can be opened.
All branches intersecting on a common node cannot have
any open switch in them at the same time. For instance, L12,
L13 and L23 intersect at node c. Hence, at least one of the
vectors cannot have an open switch in it at any given time.
V. SUGGESTED APPROACH FOR OPTIMUM NETWORK
RECONFIGURATION
International Conference and Utility Exhibition 2014 on Green Energy for Sustainable Development (ICUE 2014)
Jomtien Palm Beach Hotel and Resort, Pattaya City, Thailand, 19-21 March 2014
w wmin
w k = wmax max
k max
C1,i C1, j
C1k = C1,i
k max
C 2 ,i C 2 , j
C 2k = C 2,i
k max
Pi k +1 = Pi k + Vi k +1
(11)
True Pareto
Optimal
Front
(12)
(13)
(14)
International Conference and Utility Exhibition 2014 on Green Energy for Sustainable Development (ICUE 2014)
Jomtien Palm Beach Hotel and Resort, Pattaya City, Thailand, 19-21 March 2014
been shown. For the second case, it is assumed that only the tie
switches remain open throughout the considered time period.
For each of the six time frame scenarios, the best compromise
solution among the final non-dominated sets is selected for
comparison, with weight value of 5 to loss minimization and
voltage deviation minimization objectives each and weight
value of 1 to switching operation minimization objective.
Fig. 7. Single line diagram of IEEE 33-bus radial distribution system with
DGs
11-15-27-33-34
06:00 12:00
9-14-27-31-33
12:00 13:00
9-28-30-33-35
13:00 17:00
7-9-12-28-31
17:00 21:00
7-9-14-28-32
21:00 24:00
7-9-14-28-36
International Conference and Utility Exhibition 2014 on Green Energy for Sustainable Development (ICUE 2014)
Jomtien Palm Beach Hotel and Resort, Pattaya City, Thailand, 19-21 March 2014
TABLE II
COMPARISON OF NETWORK PERFORMANCE FOR 24 HOUR WITH DIFFERENT RECONFIGURATION STRATEGIES
Time Duration
0:00 06:00
06:00 12:00
12:00 13:00
13:00 17:00
17:00 21:00
21:00 24:00
Without configuration
Power Max. Voltage
Energy Loss
Loss
Deviation
(MWh)
(MW)
(p.u.)
0.0107
0.0163
0.054
0.0955
0.0466
0.297
0.0975
0.0188
0.0936
0.0889
0.0362
0.3184
0.0971
0.2676
0.0595
0.0522
0.0458
0.0608
Total Loss
1.0914
From the result in Table II, it can be seen that the system
efficiency and voltage profile are improved for each time
frames after the implementation of both static and dynamic
network reconfiguration. Likewise, it is seen that the system
without reconfiguration cannot rectify the voltage violation at
time frame of 17:0021:00 hours, when the average DG output
drops significantly but the load remains fairly high. The
minimum bus voltage observed during this period is 0.9405
p.u. It is also seen that the network configuration according to
static reconfiguration strategy may contribute to reduction in
losses and voltage deviation as observed in each time frames.
The total energy loss reduction compared to the first case is
around 24%. However, the fixed configuration is not optimal
for all time periods, which results in slightly higher voltage
deviations and losses as observed in all time frames compared
to dynamic reconfiguration strategy. Likewise, this strategy
also fails to keep the voltage deviation within limits as
observed in the time frame of 17:00 - 21:00 hour, where the
minimum bus voltage is 0.9484 p.u. On the other hand, with
dynamic reconfiguration, the load flow in the network is
optimized to reduce the system loss and voltage deviation for
the entire 24 hour period. It is observed that there is no voltage
limit violation in any time periods with this strategy. A total
reduction of approximately 30% in the total energy loss is
observed in this case as compared to that without network
reconfiguration.
VII. CONCLUSION
In this paper, an effective algorithm for DNCR considering
the variation of load and RES-based DG output has been
presented by using NSPSO and also network performance
results have been compared for the cases of with and without
DNCR implementation. Test results indicated that the network
performance has been improved with DNCR in terms of loss
reduction and voltage profile improvement. Thus, with proper
facilities for SCADA communication and real time
measurement in distribution automation, a switching schedule
for optimum network reconfiguration can be generated
considering the variation in load and DG output for the overall
improvement in network performance.
VIII. REFERENCE
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
D.P. Bernardon, A.P.C. Mello, L.L. Pfitscher, L.N. Canha, A.R. Abaide,
A.A.B. Ferreira, "Real-time reconfiguration of distribution network with
Gianfranco Chicco and Andrea Mazza, "An Overview of the
Probability- distributed generation," Electric Power Systems Research,
pp. 59 67, Sept. 2013.
based Methods for Optimal Electrical Distribution System
Reconfiguration," IEEE Trans, 2013.
Armin Ebrahimi Milani ,
Mahmood Reza Haghifam A new
probabilistic approach for distribution network reconfiguration:
Applicability to real networks,
Mathematical and Computer
Modelling, pp. 169179, Jun. 2011
Mohammad-Reza Andervazh, Javad Olamaei, Mahmoud-Reza
Haghifam,
Adaptive
multi-objective
distribution
network
reconfiguration using multi-objective discrete particles swarm
optimisation algorithm and graph theory, IET Generation,
Transmission & Distribution, Vol. 7, Iss. 12, pp. 13671382, 2013
L.L. Pfitscher, D.P. Bernardon, L.N. Canha, V.F. Montagner, V.J.
Garcia, A.R. Abaide, Intelligent system for automatic reconfiguration
of distribution network in real time, Electric Power Systems Research,
pp. 84 92, 2013
Aboelsood Zidan, Mostafa F. Shaaban, Ehab F. El-Saadan, Long-term
multi-objective distribution network planning by DG allocation and
feeders reconfiguration, Electric Power Systems Research, 95 104,
2013
Xiaodong Li, A Non-dominated Sorting Particle Swarm Optimizer for
Multi objective Optimization, pp. 3748, 2003.
T.-H. Chen, N.-C.Yang, Three-phase power-flow by direct Zbr method
for unbalanced radial distribution systems, IET Gener. Transmission,
Distribution, Vol.3, Iss.10, pp.903-910, 2009.
IX. BIOGRAPHIES
Subas Ratna Tuladhar received the B.Eng. degree in electrical engineering
from Tribhuwan University, Nepal in 2008. He is currently a Masters student
in Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Thailand. His research interests
include power system optimization, power electronics, power system
integrated renewable energy, and smart grids.
Dr. Jai Govind Singh (M10) received his M. Tech. and Ph.D. degrees, all in
Electrical Engineering, from IIT Rookree and IIT Kanpur, respectively.
He is currently Assistant Professor in the energy field of study, Asian
Institute of Technology, Thailand. His research interests include power
system operation and control, FACTS, power sector deregulation and power
system planning, Smartgrid and Microgrid, integration of renewable energy
resources into power system and power distribution system.
Weerakorn Ongsakul (S89M95) received the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in
electrical engineering from Texas A&M University, College Station, in 1991
and 1994, respectively.
He is an Associate Professor at Energy Field of Study, and former Dean of
School of Environmental, Resources, and Development, Asian Institute of
Technology (AIT), Thailand. His research interests are in parallel processing
International Conference and Utility Exhibition 2014 on Green Energy for Sustainable Development (ICUE 2014)
Jomtien Palm Beach Hotel and Resort, Pattaya City, Thailand, 19-21 March 2014