User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

User talk:Maslowsneeds
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents
1 How Do I Look
2 Proposed deletion of Suzannah B. Troy
3 Nomination of Eleanor Humes Haney for deletion
4 Talkback
5 File permission problem with File:Suzannah-B-Troy.jpg
6 Nomination of Aam Aadmi Sena for deletion
7 Do you want to break India up into many smaller countries?
8 Disambiguation link notification for March 6
9 Non-neutrally worded RfC
10 Debbie Wasserman Schultz
11 Note
12 Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
13 November 2016
14 Peace
15 November 2016
16 Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
17 Please stop posting on this page while the user is blocked

How Do I Look
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article How Do I Look, suggesting that it be
deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article
may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also
"What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by
removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your
edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even
though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may
still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it
may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only
person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. -WebHamster 01:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Suzannah B. Troy

The article Suzannah B. Troy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 1 of 11

User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

Does not meet our standards for notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of
several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in
your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion
without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 21:22,
30 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Eleanor Humes Haney for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Eleanor Humes Haney, which you created or to
which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted
if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion
policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Humes Haney until a consensus is
reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However,
do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:18, 17
September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Hello, Maslowsneeds. You have new messages at Courcelles's talk page.
Message added 03:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/inde
x.php?title=User_talk:Maslowsneeds&action=edit) at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}}
template.

File permission problem with File:Suzannah-B-Troy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Suzannah-B-Troy.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid
copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the
given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially
online), please either
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 2 of 11

User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the
site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it
under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS
pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps
listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that
email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as
{{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use,
and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image
copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners
have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created
in your upload log (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Maslowsneeds
). Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described
on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions
page. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 01:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Maslowsneeds. You have new messages at Ron Ritzman's talk page.
You can remove this notice (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maslowsneeds&action=edit)
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of Aam Aadmi Sena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aam Aadmi Sena is suitable for inclusion in
Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aam Aadmi Sena until a consensus is reached,
and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines
which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in
the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shrikanthv
(talk) 07:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Do you want to break India up into many smaller countries?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 3 of 11

User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

Do you want to break India up into many smaller countries?VictoriaGraysonTalk 00:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
What is this supposed to mean ? I'm sorry, but you're not being clear. Maslowsneeds (talk) 00:51, 6 March
2016 (UTC)
Do you wish to see India break up into several smaller countries?VictoriaGraysonTalk 00:52, 6
March 2016 (UTC)
When you can't argue based on facts, you create red herrings and/or go to ad hominem
attacks by either accusing people of waiving the ISIS flag or now engaging in sedition. Why
can't you focus on the merits of your amendments ? Maslowsneeds (talk) 01:02, 6 March
2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Zizi Jeanmaire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yves Saint Laurent (check to confirm (http
://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Zizi_Jeanmaire) | fix Talk
with Dab solver (http://dispenser.
homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Zizi_Jeanmaire)). Such links are almost always unintended,
VictoriaGrayson
since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ Join us at the DPL
WikiProject.
Talk
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions.
Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
VictoriaGrayson

Non-neutrally worded RfC

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with
which you may have been involved. Thank you.CFredkin (talk) 01:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

hello there - please be aware, wikileaks is not a wp:rs wikipedia reliable source, thanks Govindaharihari (talk)
19:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
hi @Govindaharihari: The link was included in the DWS article as a primary souce. See WP:PRIMARY.
maslowsneeds! 19:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Wikileaks is an illegal source - end of _Govindaharihari (talk) 19:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Where does it say in wp:rs or in WP:PRIMARY that WikiLeaks is a banned source ? Please
help correct the record. maslowsneeds! 20:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 4 of 11

User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources wikileaks is not a wp:rs - Govindaharihari (talk) 20:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Note
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It
does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all
edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related
people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to
controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating
to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant
policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This
message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to
edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to
contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
--NeilN talk to me 19:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Also note that Debbie Wasserman Schultz, which you've edited recently, is under a WP:1RR restriction,
meaning one revert per editor per 24 hour period (see the information box at the top of Talk:Debbie
Wasserman Schultz). Your two most recent reverts ([1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Debbi
e_Wasserman_Schultz&diff=736209320&oldid=736205727), [2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t
itle=Debbie_Wasserman_Schultz&diff=736209607&oldid=736209320)) are consecutive and count as a
single revert, but you also reverted earlier today (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Debbie_Was
serman_Schultz&diff=736180347&oldid=736133482). Please consider self-reverting the recent edits.
clpo13(talk) 23:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for correcting the record. maslowsneeds! 00:59, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland
Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to
motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more
countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or
regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia
etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 5 of 11

User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of
articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa
Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target
every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so
consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might
contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 10:05, 6 November 2016
(UTC)

November 2016
Your recent editing history at Hillary Clinton shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To
resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted.
Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If
discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute
resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editingespecially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a
24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or
different material each timecounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule
often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringeven if you don't violate the three-revert
ruleshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scjessey (talk) 14:33, 7
November 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User
talk:Scjessey has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please
use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn
more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you
may leave a message on my talk page. You cannot accuse me of edit warring with a single reversion in a 24hour period as a retaliation for being templated yourself. Scjessey (talk) 14:40, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Peace
You're right of course. But I can't really join in on the discussion so close to the elections, especially after
having talk page visits from 2 ArbCom members. I hope that you'll find the equanimity to do what's probably
right on the eve of the election, which may be to let it go, for now. A lot of us saw. Let's try not to all get
banned. ^^ SashiRolls (talk) 16:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 6 of 11

User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

To enforce an arbitration decision and for "edits that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our
standards of behavior", you have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours. You are
welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior
may result in a longer block or other sanctions.
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section)
before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to
the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators'
noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}.

If you intend
to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals
template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email),
before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Doug Weller talk 17:25, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding
Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the
explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a)
AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process
may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the
request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision
without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are
blocked.
Maslowsneeds (block log (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Maslowsneeds
) active blocks (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:BlockList&action=search&ip=Maslowsneeds) global
blocks (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:GlobalBlockList&ip=Maslowsneeds) autoblocks (https://tools.w
mflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=Maslowsneeds&project=en.wikipedia.org) contribs deleted contribs abuse filter log (h
ttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Maslowsneeds) creation log (https://en.wikipe
dia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=newusers&user=Maslowsneeds) change block settings unblock (https://en.wi
kipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:BlockList&action=unblock&ip=Maslowsneeds))

Request reason:
Please copy my appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or administrators' noticeboard. Your
reason here OR place the reason below this template. maslowsneeds! 21:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There is no indication Maslowsneeds will accept any responsibility for their actions, which are a clear
violation of the 1RR Discretionary Sanctions on the Hillary Clinton article. Instead they are blaming
other editors and administrators in a clear case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. If this continues after the
block expires, further blocks of longer duration are inevitable. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:55, 7
November 2016 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 7 of 11

User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use
the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may
be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

maslowsneeds! 21:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Because I questioned the flaming warning by a pro-Hillary editor, I get blocked ? Doesn't this prove the culture
of retaliation and hostility that I was questioning ?maslowsneeds! 21:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Maslowsneeds, you have a very serious case of WP:ICANTHEARYOU. You are not listening to what
people are telling you. You have been told, multiple times, what you were doing wrong. Two things: you
inserted information into the article which you knew was against consensus, and you did it a second time
in violation of the 1RR restriction. When people warn you about this, they are not "flaming" you; they
are informing you, letting you know that you are breaking rules, and that it could get you blocked. If you
had actually read and listed to the warnings you got, you would not be blocked now. If you had not gone
running to ANI with a complaint against someone who gave you a perfectly valid warning, you would
probably not be blocked now. Wikipedia has rules. They are spelled out very clearly. If you violate the
rules, people warn you so that you can stop doing it before you get into trouble. If you don't listen to the
warnings and keep doing it, you do get into trouble. End of story. --MelanieN (talk) 21:28, 7 November
2016 (UTC)
Please, you are one of the people, who are gatekeeping the Clinton articles. By coming to my talk
page and screaming in all caps, you are proving the kind of retaliation that you wage against
people, who make edits in good faith to articles, which are gate-keeping. This is bullying. Is that
how they teach you to smother other editors, to get your way, to keep your edits ?maslowsneeds!
22:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
This is an administrator you are talking about. You are walking on thin ice and on the verge
of falling. Your attitude toward other users is repulsive, accusing everyone of bullying,
intimidation, harassment, etc. It's clear that you were warned by multiple editors about your
behaviour and in retaliation claim false accusations and run to ANI when things don't go your
way. If this is the way you act, you won't last on Wikipedia. You must learn to collaborate
and cooperate regardless of the circumstances and article. I suggest that you drop the stick
about this whole "gate keeping" and focus on improving your behaviour rather than pointing
the finger at others when, in fact, you were at fault. You were warned and chose to ignore it.
That is your fault, not MelanieN's, Ad Orientum (sp?), the user you reported at ANI (forgot
username) or anybody else. You refuse to hear the truth. Enough is enough. Callmemirela
" {Talk} 22:35, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
You came to my talk page to pile on the harassment ?maslowsneeds! 02:01, 8
November 2016 (UTC)
I don't really understand why you believe that including her religion is critical of Clinton or is necessary
to "gatekeeping the Clinton articles with Wikipedia's consent on the eve of elections, so you can get your
candidate to win" [3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hillary_Clinton&type=revision&diff=7
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 8 of 11

User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

48280857&oldid=748243312). But when an article is 1RR, breaking it when you've been warned is pretty
much a guaranteed block. The only exception would be something very serious like removing a copyvio
or clearcut BLP violation (or getting lucky).
As always the case on wikipedia (or for that matter the rest of the world), talking about how wrong others
were is not going to help your case. Even if they were seriously in the wrong, this doesn't help you much
since you were still in the wrong by breaking the simple bright line of 1RR.
As for your comment here [4] (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27
_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=748327844), it sounds like you still have a misunderstanding
of how wikipedia works. By and large admins don't have an exclusive right to decide who is right and
who is wrong. Every wikipedia editor can. And for that reason there's no really any place, not even AN//I
where you can go to get the opinion of only admins.
In fact framing it as who is right and who is wrong is probably excessively adversarial anyway. The
question is, who is behaving in such a way to negatively affect wikipedia and what, if anything, should be
done about it. (Content disputes don't belong on AN//I, so the question of who is right in a content dispute
doesn't even arise.) You need to respect the opinion of other experience editors as much as you respect
admin opinion. I appreciate there is some gray area here because DS and arbcom enforcement, but even
there the opinion of other editors is generally taken into account.
Finally if you feel that WP:Consensus is wrong, you generally need to establish that before hand rather
than simply editing because "fallacy that inclusion violates policy". Remember since consensus needs to
be policy based, it should be trivial to overturn any supposed consensus that violates policy. If you can't
do so, perhaps your understanding of policy isn't correct. Either way, since wikipedia operates by
consensus, if you're nearly the only one who feels something is against policy, even if you are correct,
you're never likely to be seen as in the right when you go against a consensus that it isn't against policy.
If you feel that this is harassment, I'm sorry.
Consider however that you've only been blocked for 31 hours. You likely will be back if you want to. If
you want to stick around, you need to understand why you've had so many problems so far. And even for
someone who is opposed to Clinton (which I admit I'm not really) but understands how wikipedia works,
it's easy to see that you've handled this wrong. Actually you should consider that as long as those who see
things different behave in similar fashions, things are never going to change.
P.S. I see that you've been topic banned from American politics. Maybe that will be enough to prevent
future problems. But you still should try and understand why you went about this wrong, since ultimately
it will help you succeed here on wikipedia.
Nil Einne (talk) 04:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
You came here just to pile on the harassment, proving my point. It's apparent that Wikipedia
sanctions arbitrary and capricious sanctions and threats by biased editors, who are, indeed,
gatekeeping articles. I object to this treatment. The more editors, who come to this page to harass
me on top of the ban, in failed attempts to justify the ban, proves my point.maslowsneeds! 09:11,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 9 of 11

User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

8 November 2016 (UTC)

No, he was giving you good advice. The only point you are making is that you don't
understand why you were blocked and then banned, which doesn't bode well. Try reading it
gain with an open mind. Doug Weller talk 12:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
You came here to rub it in that you banned me. You must get some sick sense of
enjoyment out of this. I guess this is the culture you must defend, since this is the
culture you reinforce ?maslowsneeds! 13:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement

sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages related to post-1932 American politics
and closely related people, broadly construed. Please consult WP:TBAN to see what topic
banned means.
You have been sanctioned for persistent disruptive editing and WP:BLP violations in this area, and
personal attacks towards other users in the process of editing it.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the
Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics
2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration
Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the
sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means.
If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of
enforcement of this sanctionand you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration
enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead
of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you
are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free
to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 23:24, 7
November 2016 (UTC)
Bishonen | talk 23:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC).

Please stop posting on this page while the user is blocked

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 10 of 11

User talk:Maslowsneeds - Wikipedia

08/11/2016 12:57

Maslowsneeds is clearly getting more and more angry and shooting himself in the foot on this page. But I
haven't seen him post other than in response to others. Please, everybody, stop posting here while the user is
blocked. (Only a few hours more.) Blocked users are generally irritable and unlikely to be receptive to advice. It
may be good advice, but since it's invariably received as provocation, please just stop. And revoking his
talkpage access, as has been suggested,[5] (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Doug_Weller
&diff=748492889&oldid=748310541) while presumably letting other people continue to post, is not an option
IMO. Bishonen | talk 16:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC).
All this harassment is transparent to everybody visiting this public page.--maslowsneeds! 17:54, 8
November 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maslowsneeds&oldid=748529949"

This page was last modified on 8 November 2016, at 12:54.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may
apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered
trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Maslowsneeds

Page 11 of 11