Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exceptions:
Rule 138, Sec. 34
Rule 115, Sec 1 (c)
Prohibition from practice
Art VI, Sec. 14; Art.VIII, Sec. 15; Art.IX-A, Sec. 2; Art. IX, Sec. 8 (2) (1987 Constitution)
RA 7160, Sec. 90-91
Rule 148, Sec. 35
People v. Villanueva, G.R. No. L-19450 May 27, 1965
RA 910, Sec 1
Duties of a lawyer
Rule 138, Sec. 20
Research: What are the four-fold duties of a lawyer,
counsel de oficio, counsel de parte
See also: B.M. No. 1132, Nov. 12, 2000;
B.M. No. 1922, June 3, 2008
Code of Professional Responsibility
Canon 1
Research: Barratry, Ambulance Chasing
Barrios v. Martinez, A.C. No. 4585. November 12, 2004
Ui v. Bonifacio, A.C. No. 3319. June 8, 2000
Figueroa v. Barranco, SBC Case No. 519. July 31, 1997
Cordova v. Cordova, 179 SCRA 680 (1989)
Guevarra v. Eala, 529 SCRA 1 (2007)
Soriano v. Dizon, A.C. No. 6792, January 25, 2006
Calub v. Suller, A.C. No. 1474, January 28, 2000
Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, 416 SCRA 465
Saburnido v. Madrono, 366 SCRA 1 (2001)
Castaneda v. Ago, 65 SCRA 505 (1975)
Canon 2
In the Matter of: Svitlana E. Sangary
http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/ca/SangarySvitlana.pdf
http://documents.latimes.com/judges-recommendation-lawyer-/
Ledesma v. Climaco, 57 SCRA 473 (1974)
See ROC Rule 141, Sec. 18; Rule 3, Sec. 21
History of suits in forma pauperis
Algura v. The City of Naga (G.R. No.150135, October 30, 2006)
Canon 3
Khan v. Simbillo, 409 SCRA 299 (2003)
In re Tagorda, 53 Phil 37 (1929)
Ulep v. Legal Clinic, 223 SCRA 378 (1993)
Assignment: Submit a photocopy of a page from a law list
Dacanay v. Baker and McKenzie, 136 SCRA 349 (1985)
See: http://www.bakermckenzie.com/Philippines/
Samonte v. Gatdula, 303 SCRA 756 (1999)
Cruz v. Salva, 105 Phil 1151 (1959)
Canon 4
Re: Request Of National Committee On Legal Aid To Exempt Legal Aid Clients From Paying Filing, Docket
And Other Fees, August 28, 2009
Canon 5
B.M. 850, October 2, 2001 (MCLE)
See also: Who are exempt
B.M. No. 1922, June 3, 2008
Canon 6
Vitriolo v. Dasig, 400 SCRA 172 (2003)
People v. Pineda, 20 SCRA 748 (1967)
Collantes vs Romeren 200 SCRA 584 (1991)
Huyssen vs Gutierrez 485 SCRA 244 (2006)
Misamin v. San Juan, 72 SCRA 491 (1976)
See also: RA 3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. Sec. 3(d); RA 6713 7(b)
PCGG v. Sandiganbayan, 455 SCRA 526 (2005)
Canon 7
RA 6397
In re 1989 Elections of the IBP, 178 SCRA 398 (1989)
Santos v. Llamas, 322 SCRA 529 (2000)
Letter of Atty. CecilioArevalo, 458 SCRA 209 (2005)
Foodsphere v. Mauricio, A.C. No. 7199 (22 July 2009)
Young v. Batuegas, 403 SCRA 123 [2003]).
In re Parazo, 82 Phil. 230 [1948])
Zaguirre v. Castillo, 398 SCRA 659 [2003]:
Tapucar v. Tapucar, 293 SCRA 331 [1998]:
Canon 8
Camacho v. Pagulayan et al (A.C. No. 4807, March 22, 2000)
Reyes vs. Chiong, Jr., 405 SCRA 212 (2003)
Laput v. Remotigue A.M. No. 219 (1962)
Canon 9
Aguirre v. Rana 403 SCRA 342 (2003)
Alawi v. Alauya, supra
Ulep v. Legal Clinic, Inc, supra
People v. Villanueva, supra
Rule 138, Sec. 1, Rules of Court
Aguirre v. Rana, supra
OCA v. Ladaga, 350 SCRA 326
Rule 138, Sec. 34, Rules of Court in relation to People v. Sin Ben, 98 Phil. 138 (1955)
Guballa v. Caguioa, 78 SCRA 302
Eco v. Rodriguez, 107 Phil. 612 (1960)
Robinson v. Villafuerte, 18 Phil 121 (1911)
Amalgamated Laborers Assn. v. CIR. 22 SCRA 1266 (1968)
Tan TekBeng v. David. 128 SCRA 389 (1983)
Halili v. CIR. 136 SCRA 113 (1965))
Five J Taxi v. NLRC, 235 SCRA 556
Canon 10
Cobb Perez v. Lantin, 24 SCRA 291 (1968)
Young v. Batuegas, supra
COMELEC v. Noynay, 292 SCRA 254 (1992)
Rule 138, Sec. 20 (d) in relation to Garcia v. Francisco 220 SCRA 512 (1993)
Gomez v. Presiding Judge 249 SCRA 432
Canon 11
In re Sotto 82 Phil 595 (1949)
De Gracia v. Warden of Makati, G.R. No. L-42032, January 9, 1976