Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269198109
CITATION
READS
187
2 authors:
Brad Davis
Onur Avci
University of Kentucky
Qatar University
14 PUBLICATIONS 14 CITATIONS
32 PUBLICATIONS 45 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
ABSTRACT
Slender monumental stairs are major architectural features in hotels,
condominiums, hospitals, and other high-end building structures. Architectural
requirements for these are usually very aggressive, with long spans and slender
stringers being the norm. Slender stairs often have fairly massive treads and
guardrails, which combined with slender stringers, results in natural frequencies
within reach of the very large lower harmonics of the force caused by a person
descending the stair. Stair designers must be able to predict the vertical vibration
response of a stair during the design phase. Current prediction methods rely on finite
element analysis based response prediction methods which are outside the reach of
many structural engineering firms. This paper presents a simplified response
prediction method, based on the fundamental natural mode of the stair, which is
suitable for manual calculations. Response predictions are compared to experimental
measurements to show that the predictions are accurate enough for design use.
INTRODUCTION
Slender stairs are architecturally impressive structures located in buildings
such as airports, hospitals, convention centers, condominiums, and hotels. From an
aesthetics point of view, slender stairs usually have long clear spans with slender
stringers, and are typically loaded with heavy treads and guardrails. This results in
low natural frequencies which makes them vulnerable to resonant responses to stair
ascents or descents. For the purposes of this research, slender monumental stairs are
those with natural frequencies below about 10 Hz.
The vertical forces generated by humans ascending and descending are
especially unfavorable. Humans typically ascend and descend stairs at step
frequencies up to 4 Hz, which is much higher than step frequencies observed for
walking on a regular flat surface. Ascents are comfortable at 2 Hz and 3.3 Hz, and
uncomfortable at other frequencies; descents are comfortable at any step frequency
below about 4 Hz (Kerr 1998). Thus, the second harmonic can match any natural
frequency below about 8 Hz, which allows it to excite most slender stairs, and the
third harmonic can match the natural frequency of any slender stair. (Descriptions of
footstep force harmonics and Fourier amplitudes are provided in Murray et al. (1997)
and Smith et al. (2007).) The situation is even less favorable because footstep forces
while ascending and descending stairsespecially the second harmonic of a
descentare much larger than forces applied while walking on a flat surface.
Overall, the structural design of monumental stairs is a major challenge from
vibrations serviceability point of view. The potential for annoying vibration is high,
so engineers need access to a stair vibration evaluation method for use during design.
The major floor vibrations serviceability design guides (Murray et al. 1997,
Smith et al. 2007) do not provide guidance to address stair vibrations. The relatively
recent study by Davis and Murray (2009) was conducted to gain insight and provide
guidance for evaluating vibration of slender stairs. In that study, a slender
monumental stair was modal tested to estimate natural modal properties.
Accelerations due to stair ascents and descents were also measured. A detailed,
unadjusted, finite element model was created of the stair using only information that
would be available to a designer. The finite element model was used to predict the
modal properties and frequency response function (FRF) magnitude for load and
acceleration at midspan. The FRF magnitude was then used with established
harmonic footstep forces from Kerr (1998) to predict steady-state acceleration due to
ascents and descents. The ratio of measured peak acceleration to predicted steadystate acceleration was consistent enough to allow a 0.35 reduction factor to be
established. Based on Kerr (1998), Davis and Murray (2009) recommended the stair
evaluation be performed for a 76 kg (168 lbf) walker and the design dynamic load
factors (DLF) (ratio of harmonic force amplitude to bodyweight) shown in Table 1.
(Average DLFs are used for comparisons of measured and predicted accelerations.)
Because stair descent step frequencies more easily match natural frequencies, and
because descents have higher forces, they are always more severe than ascents. Davis
and Murray also recommended a 5.0 Hz lower limit on the natural frequency to
prevent first harmonic excitation and resulting severe accelerations.
Table 1. Dynamic Load Factors
Dynamic Load Factor,
Ascending
Descending
Harmonic
Average Design Average Design
Second
0.13
0.22
0.20
0.33
Third
0.06
0.11
0.09
0.16
Fourth
0.03
0.07
0.06
0.13
The resulting evaluation method, based on an FEA of the stair, is useful but
the procedure is not fast or easy enough for routine structural engineering design
office usage. A simplified and more feasible method is needed for the vibration
serviceability evaluation and design of slender monumental stairs. Thus, the
objective of this paper is the development of a simplified method using manual
calculations. The method is simple as the name implies and the procedure is fast
enough for routine structural engineering office use. The scope of the method
developed herein is limited to linear stairs such as the example shown in Figure 1.
The FEA-based method by Davis and Murray (2009) should be used for other slender
stairs.
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
Experimental modal testing was conducted on an elegant slender monumental
stair located in the lobby and restaurant area of a high-rise hotel and condominium.
Testing was conducted in an attempt to find estimates of the natural frequencies,
acceleration response (FRF magnitude), and responses to ascents and descents. The
tested stair and surrounding features combine to form a major architectural feature in
the lobby and restaurant area. The stair consists of a main flight of stairs from the
lobby to an intermediate landing and a shorter flight from the intermediate landing to
the second floor, as shown in Figure 2. The main span is of primary interest for this
study.
The stair main span is very slender, with two stringers at approximately a 30
degree angle, spanning 9.49 m (31 ft) horizontally between supports. The stringers
are spaced 1.17 m (3 ft 10 in.) apart, center-to-center. The stringers are 305 mm tall
by 203 mm wide by 15.9 mm thick (12 in. by 8 in. by 5/8 in.) steel hollow structural
sections (HSS). The stringer size was limited to satisfy architectural slenderness
requirements. Each stringer bears on a steel angle seat at the lobby end and is
suspended from a small HSS hanger from the second floor. The laminated glass
treads are 1.78 m (5 ft 10 in.) long, weigh approximately 1.5 kPa (31 psf), and are
supported on thin rubber pads as shown in Figure 3. The treads are through-bolted to
bent plates which are welded to the top of the HSS stringer. The approximately 1.2 m
(4 ft) high clear glass guardrails weigh approximately 0.48 kPa (10 psf) and are
connected to the stringers using spider fittings (Figure 3). The guardrails are in
discrete sections as shown in Figure 3 except they are connected by the handrails.
After the EMA tests, accelerations were measured while individuals ascended
and descended the main span of the stair. Four healthy male walkers participated in
the testing program. They varied from 84 kg (185 lbf) to 105 kg (230 lbf), and
stepped on each tread rather than skipping treads. During each test, the step
frequency, controlled by listening to a metronome, was such that a force harmonic
frequency matched the fundamental frequency, thus causing resonance. To exclude
unrepresentative peaks, acceleration waveforms were bandpass filtered to include
frequency content between 1 Hz and 15 Hz only. Resonant build-ups were observed
in most tests. Table 2 shows the measured peak accelerations (Davis and Murray
2009). As expected, the accelerations due to descents were higher than accelerations
due to ascents. For more information, see Davis and Murray (2009).
Table 2. Measured Peak Accelerations
Description
Peak Acceleration (%g)
Ascending, Second Harmonic
4.1
Ascending, Third Harmonic
1.1
Descending, Second Harmonic
4.7
Descending, Third Harmonic
1.7
fn =
gEI
2 wL4
(1)
where
g =gravitational acceleration
E =stringer elastic modulus
I =stringer moment of inertia
w=uniform weight (force per length along the diagonal) supported by the stringer,
including the stringer, treads, guardrail, and a minimal allowance for people on
the stair
L =stringer length (diagonal distance between supports)
Some stairs have more than two stringers, and in those cases, the stringers
often have unequal load and moment of inertia. For those, I is the sum of the
individual stringer moments of inertia and w is the sum of uniform weights supported
by each stringer.
The simply supported beam fundamental modal mass, for transverse load and
acceleration at midspan, is half the beam mass. Thus, the stair fundamental modal
mass is approximately half the total stair mass. For a stair with two stringers:
M = wL/g
(2)
FPerp
2 M
(3)
where
a sMidspan =
Q cos
Q cos 2
cos =
2 M
2 M
(4)
as =
Q cos 2
r w
2 M
(5)
(6)
(7)
where
xr =distance from end of stringer to response location, measured on the diagonal
xw=distance from end of stringer to walker force location, measured on the
diagonal
The peak acceleration due to walking is much less than the value computed
using Eq. 5 because resonant build-ups do not last long enough to achieve a steadystate response, and because footsteps are not perfectly periodic. Davis and Murray
(2009) found that the peak acceleration due to walking can be predicted by
multiplying the predicted steady-state acceleration by a reduction factor, R.
ap = R
Q cos 2
r w
2 M
(8)
gEI
2 wL4
(1, repeated)
Similarly, the modal mass of a simply supported beam is used to develop the
steady-state acceleration equation, which is adjusted to provide a prediction of the
vertical acceleration at an location on the stair, due to an ascent or descent at any
location on the stair:
ap = R
Q cos 2
r w
2 M
(8, repeated)
REFERENCES
Davis, B. and Murray, T.M. (2009). Slender Monumental Stair Vibration
Serviceability. J. Archit. Eng., 15(4), 111121.
Kerr, S.C. (1998). Human Induced Loading on Staircases. Ph.D. Thesis, University
of London, London, England.
Murray, T.M., Allen, D.E., and Unger, E.E. (1997). Steel Design Guide Series 11:
Floor Vibrations Due to Human Activity, American Institute of Steel
Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
Smith, A.L., Hicks, S.J., Devine, P.J. (2007). Design of Floors for Vibration: A New
Approach. The Steel Construction Institute (SCI), Berkshire, England.