Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
The structural determination of dendritic molecules faces a
hierarchy of tasks. The perfection and monodispersity of the
molecular structures are shown by spectroscopic and chromatographic techniques.[1] Scattering techniques and electron
microscopy establish the overall shape of the three-dimensional objects in solution and in the solid state. Scanning probe
microscopy has become increasingly important, since it allows
direct visualization of dendritic nanostructures[24] in real
space and tests their shape-persistence under different stimuli.
A particularly convincing and aesthetically appealing way of
looking at dendrimer structures rests upon the X-ray analysis
of single crystals. However, the growth of single crystals of
large dendritic molecules of suitable size and perfection has
encountered a variety of problems and has so far been
restricted to comparatively small molecules. A major obstacle
is the conformational flexibility of most dendrimers, which
hampers the formation of a perfect long-range order, which is
typical for high-quality single crystals. It is characteristic that a
propyleneimine dendrimer could be crystallized only after
reducing the mobility by the formation of hydrogen bonds at
the surface.[5] Another problem stems from the fact that
dendrimers often crystallize as solvates or chlatrates, that is,
with inclusion of solvent molecules. Crystals of this type are in
many cases quite unstable and degrade rapidly by the
evaporation of the solvent.
[a] Prof. Dr. K. Mllen, Dipl.-Chem. R. E. Bauer, Dr. V. Enkelmann,
Dr. U. M. Wiesler, Dr. A. J. Berresheim
Max-Planck-Institute for Polymer Research
Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz (Germany)
Fax: ( 49)-6131-379100
E-mail: muellen@mpip-mainz.mpg.de
3858
Keywords:
dendrimers
nanostructures polyphenylene
dendrimers structure elucidation
0947-6539/02/0817-3858 $ 20.00+.50/0
3858 3864
Molecules 1, 2, and 3 represent the first generations of
branched polyphenylenes; they illustrate the great structural
diversity of this dendrimer type that results from the use of
Results
0947-6539/02/0817-3859 $ 20.00+.50/0
3859
K. Mllen et al.
FULL PAPER
Figure 1. The schematic interaction between the protons of the core with
those of the surrounding phenyl groups in the case of 2-Ph.
Discussion
The present study connects to earlier crystallographic works
of our group upon oligophenylenes[15, 16, 20] and opens the way
toward dendritic channel-forming networks with potential
host guest properties. Single crystals of 1-Ph and 2-Ph,
suitable for X-ray structure analysis, were grown from
CH2Cl2/heptane mixtures at room temperature by slow
evaporation. The single crystals of 3 were grown from
tetrachloroethane.[21] As it has been pointed out before the
crystals of all three dendrimers obtained in this way are
solvates and contain a large number of solvent molecules. As a
consequence the crystals are unstable under ambient conditions. Crystals of 1-Ph and 3 deteriorate in less than a
minute if kept outside the mother liquor. Crystals were
3860
0947-6539/02/0817-3860 $ 20.00+.50/0
Polyphenylene Dendrimers
3858 3864
Table 1. Interplanar angles between phenyl rings in the dendritic arms:
angles observed in the hexaphenylbenzene groups in 1-Ph and 2-Ph.
Planes[a]
1-Ph
(arm 1)
1-Ph
(arm 2)
1-Ph
(arm 3)
1-Ph
(arm 4)
2-Ph
12
13
14
15
16
17
120.1
92.7
94.4
107.1
111.5
112.4
114.3
115.1
112.8
116.6
121.6
112.6
107.9
106.6
123.0
122.2
111.1
105.1
124.5
103.9
103.2
111.3
113.7
118.3
115.1
115.6
113.2
116.4
117.4
115.3
[a] Plane 1 denotes the central plane, plane 2 is oriented to the center of the
molecule, and the other planes are arranged in a clockwise manner
arm 1
arm 2
arm 3
arm 4
arm 5
arm 6
12
13
14
15
16
128.5
122.6
117.6
118.4
110.8
132.0
123.5
123.8
114.7
125.4
132.6
123.7
113.3
116.0
121.1
135.3
124.1
119.1
112.1
118.1
140.3
119.1
120.1
116.5
121.8
138.9
117.5
117.8
113.1
124.3
[a] Plane 1 denotes the central plane, plane 2 is oriented to the center of the
molecule, and the other planes are arranged in a clockwise manner
0947-6539/02/0817-3861 $ 20.00+.50/0
3861
K. Mllen et al.
FULL PAPER
of the dendritic arms about the bonds to the central sixmembered ring. It can be expected that unlike the schematic
view shown in Figure 2 steric repulsion will force the
pentaphenylbenzene groups in a perpendicular orientation
so that the shape of a six-bladed propeller results. Inspection
of Figure 2 (bottom) shows that this is indeed the case.
Dendrimer 3 crystallizes without any inherent symmetry in
the triclinic space group P1; this allows for six individual twist
angles for the dendritic arms. Five of these are oriented almost
perpendicular to the central ring, the last one is oriented
almost parallel to it. The perpendicular arms are oriented in a
regular fashion so that the hydrogen in the pentaphenylbenzene substituents points alternatingly up and down.
Dendrimer 3 organizes in its crystal structure in an
unexpected and fascinating fashion. A projection of the
structure on the [100] plane is shown in Figure 5. The structure
is built up by columns, which are formed by the parallel
dendritic arms. This arrangement places the five perpendicular arms in such a way that they form a pseudohexagonal
honeycomb framework. Thus large rhombic channels are
formed that extend through the crystal along the a direction.
These channels contain 18 molecules tetrachloroethane per
unit cell. The diameter of these channels is in the range of
0947-6539/02/0817-3862 $ 20.00+.50/0
Polyphenylene Dendrimers
10 and much larger than the included solvent molecules.
These represent about 25 % of the total mass; the free cross
section of the channels can be assessed to be approximately
20 % of the bc plane. Unlike many other channel forming
organic structures the channels are comparatively large, and
the walls of the channels are formed by the rigid pentaphenylbenzene side groups. The low stability of the crystals can be
attributed to this result; the solvent molecules are much
smaller than the channel diameter and are not fixed by
intermolecular forces like, for example, hydrogen bonds. Thus
it can be expected that diffusion along the wide and extended
channels may be quite unhindered.
Conclusion
Crystal structures, suitable for X-ray structure analysis of
three polyphenylene dendrimers were grown, whereas 3
represents the up to now biggest oligophenylene nanostructure from which crystallographic data is available. In the three
crystal structures the solvent molecules are included without
specific interaction within the framework of the dendritic
molecules and fill the voids. With the exception of the
unsuccessful experiments to build host guest complexes of 2Ph, no attempts have been made to exchange the solvent
molecules with specific guests. This would be of particular
interest in the channel-forming crystal structure of 3. Here
interesting composite structures could be obtained, for
example, by incorporation of large rod-like molecules. This
could be done either by cocrystallization as discussed above
for 2-Ph or by an in situ exchange reaction.
3858 3864
6832.8(3) 3 ; R 15 %; 3: a 11.0245(2), b 23.8982(6), c 42.406(1) ;
a 89.194(1)8, b 95.702(1)8, g 90.194(1)8; V 11 002(1) 3 ; R 20 %.
General procedure for the aryl-ethynyl coupling to aromatic bromo
compounds:[2325] The aromatic bromine compound was dissolved in a
degassed mixture of two parts of triethylamine and one part of toluene
(about 30 40 mL of solvents per gram of bromo compound) under argon.
After that, bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(ii) dichloride (5 mol %),
copper(i) iodide (10 mol %), and triphenylphosphine (10 mol % with
respect to the contained in the halogenated compound) were added under
a flow of argon. The flask was then sealed with a septum and the reaction
mixture stirred at 50 60 8C for about 10 min, after which the ethynyl
compound (1 1.1 molar equiv per bromine) was injected. The reaction
mixture was stirred further at 80 90 8C and monitored by TLC until no
further conversion could be observed (usually 2 5 h). After allowing the
solution to cool, it was poured into an equivalent volume of dichloromethane and filtered. Hydrochloric acid, about 6 m, was carefully added to
the filtrate until the aqueous phase became slightly acidic (pH < 5). After
that, the organic phase was removed, washed twice with distilled water,
extracted with a saturated solution of ammonium chloride, washed again
several times with distilled water, and dried over magnesium sulfate. The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product
purified by column chromatography on silica gel.
General procedure for the aryl-ethynyl coupling to aromatic iodo
compounds: The procedure is the same as stated above in the case of the
aromatic bromo compounds with the difference of the reaction temperature: In case of the aromatic iodo compounds the reactions were carried
out at room temperature.
General procedure for the Diels Alder cycloaddtion of phenylethynyland tetraphenylcyclopentadiene derivatives: A mixture of the phenylethynyl derivative and tetraphenylcyclopentadienone (1.5 molar equivalents per phenylethynyl bond) was refluxed for 48 h in diphenyl ether
(10 mL per gram of the starting material) under an argon atmosphere. The
cooled reaction mixture was added dropwise to pentane (100 mL). The
precipitated product was filtered under suction and re-precipitated several
times in ethanol until the red color of the cyclopentadienone disappeared.
Finally, the product was dried in vacuo.
For a detailed synthetic pathway and physical data of dendrimer 3 please
see this journal.[26]
Experimental Section
General methods: All starting materials were obtained from commercial
suppliers (Aldrich, Fluka, Fischer, Strem, Acros, Riedel de Haen) and were
used without purification. Solvents were used in HPLC grade purity as
purchased. All atmosphere-sensitive reactions were performed under
argon by using Schlenck techniques. Analytical thin-layer chromatography
(TLC) was performed on commercial Merck plates coated with silica gel F254. Flash chromatography was carried out with silica gel 60 (230
400 mesh) from Merck. Dry triethylamine was obtained by vacuum
transfer from calcium hydride. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in
C2D2Cl4 and [D8]tetrahydofuran on Bruker DPX 250, 300 AMX, and
500 DRX spectrometers with use of the solvent proton or carbon signal
as internal standard. FD mass spectra were obtained on a VG Instruments
ZAB 2-SE-FPD spectrometer. MALDI-TOF mass spectra were measured
on a Bruker Reflex II-TOF spectrometer with a 337 nm nitrogen laser and
7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) as matrix. Elemental analysis
was carried out on a Foss Heraeus Vario EL. Because of the high carbon
content in some molecules, the combustion may have been incomplete
(sooting), resulting in lower values than expected for the carbon content.
X-ray crystallographic analysis:[21] Crystal structure determinations were
carried out on an Nonius KCCD diffractometer with graphite monochromated MoKa radiation. The structures were solved by direct methods
(SHELXS-97). Refinement was done with anisotropic temperature factors
for C and Cl, the hydrogen atoms were refined with fixed isotropic
temperature factors in the riding mode. Some of the solvent molecules are
disordered. These were refined with fixed isotropic temperature factors and
occupancy factors which were fixed according to the geometry of disorder.
Refinements
8700.0(8) 3 ;
18.266(1) ;
Cascade: Tetraphenylmethane[4-4,4',4'',4''']:(4',5'-diphenyl-1,1':2',1''-terphenyl-6'-yl) (1-Ph): Colorless solid: m.p. > 300 8C; 1H NMR (300 MHz,
C2D2Cl4 , 383 K): dH 6.88 6.66 (m, 8 H), 6.39 (d, 3J 8.4 Hz, 8 H),
5.89 ppm (d, 3J 8.4 Hz, 8 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, C2D2Cl4 , 383 K): dC
143.8, 141.0, 140.5, 140.3, 140.2, 138.0, 131.8, 129.9, 129.5, 126.6, 126.4, 125.1,
124.9, 124.9 ppm; FD-MS: m/z (%): 2146.0 (100) [M], 1073.0 (8) [M2];
elemental analysis calcd (%) for C169H116 :C 94.55, H 5.45; found: C 93.49, H
5.15.
Cascade: Biphenyl[4-3,3',5,5']:(4',5'-diphenyl-1,1':2',1''-terphenyl-6'-yl) (2Ph): Colorless solid: m.p. > 300 8C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, [D8]tetrahydofuran, 303 K): dH 6.96 6.56 (m, 100 H), 6.53 (s, 2 H), 6.16 (d, 4 H), 5.67 ppm
(d, 4 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, C2D2Cl4 , 383 K): dC 141.2, 141.0, 140.9,
140.1, 139.7, 139.6, 138.2, 137.7, 134.1, 131.7, 130.6, 127.5, 127.2, 126.9, 126.6,
125.1, 124.9, 141.0, 140.9, 140.1, 139.7, 139.6, 138.2, 137.7 134.1, 131.7, 130.6,
127.5, 127.2, 126.9, 126.6, 125.1, 124.9 ppm; FD-MS: m/z (%): 1980.1 (100)
[M], 990.1 (5) [M2]; elemental analysis calcd (%) for C156H106 : C 94.61, H
5.39; found: C 93.91, H 5.39.
0947-6539/02/0817-3863 $ 20.00+.50/0
3863
K. Mllen et al.
FULL PAPER
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Bundesministerium fr Bildung und Forschung, Volkswagenstiftung, and TMR
European Research Programm through the SISITOMAS project.
[1] U.-M. Wiesler, T. Weil, K. Mllen, Top. Curr. Chem. 2001, 212, 1.
[2] H. Zhang, P. C. M. Grim, T. Vosch, U.-M. Wiesler, A. J. Berresheim,
K. Mllen, F. C. De Schryver, Langmuir 2000, 16, 9294.
[3] H. Zhang, P. C. M. Grim, P. Foubert, T. Vosch, P. Vanoppen, U. -M.
Wiesler, A. J. Berresheim, K. Mllen, F. C. De Schryver, Langmuir
2000, 16, 9009.
[4] S. Loi, U. -M. Wiesler, H. J. Butt, K. Mllen, Chem. Commun. 2000,
13, 1169.
[5] W. Bosman, M. J. Bruining, H. Kooijman, A. L. Spek, R. A. J. Janssen,
E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8547.
[6] L. Tong, H. Lau, D. M. Ho, R. A. Pascal-Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 6000.
[7] R. A. Pascal, Jr., W. D. McMillan, D. van-Engen, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1986, 108, 5652.
[8] R. A. Pascal, Jr., W. D. McMillan, D. van-Engen, R. G. Eason, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 4660.
[9] N. Smyth, D. Van Engen, R. A. Pascal, Jr., J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
1937.
[10] L. Tong, D. M. Ho, N. J. Vogelaar, C. E. Schutt, R. A. Pascal, Jr., J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7291.
[11] R. A. Pascal, Jr., N. Hayashi, D. M. Ho, Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 3549.
[12] U.-M. Wiesler, A. J. Berresheim, F. Morgenroth, G. Lieser, K. Mllen,
Macromolecules 2001, 34, 187.
[13] J. Berresheim, M. Mller, K Mllen, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1747.
[14] M. Wind, U.-M. Wiesler, K. Saalwchter, K. Mllen H. W. Spiess,
Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 752.
3864
0947-6539/02/0817-3864 $ 20.00+.50/0