Assessment task (Making Task Number 2)

STUDENT NAME:

Year/level

Unit 4 School-assessed Task 2

Outcome 2- Evaluation
Year 12

Teacher

Heidi Wolfenden

Date given to students

14th September 2017

Due date

24th October 2017

Unit name

Outcome 2: Evaluation

Provide visual and written documentation that identifies and evaluates the extent to which the artworks reflect
the selected potential directions, and effectively demonstrates a cohesive relationship between the works.

Time to complete the task: 4 weeks

Assessment Task 1- Total grade for Unit 4 -SAT 30% (Outcome 1&2)
Main Inquiry Question: How did you refine the potential directions in order to develop your final artworks?
Sub-questions:

What is the main focus and subject matter of your artworks?

How have your potential directions contributed to the development and refinement of artworks?

Which potential directions did you use to develop the artworks? (Provide visual evidence)

How did you refine your potential directions in order to develop the final artworks?

Do your artworks effectively communicate your ideas?

How do the artworks realise the communication of ideas?

How have you refined and presented your artworks?

How have you applied materials and techniques when creating your final artwork?

How have aesthetic qualities been resolved in your final artworks?

Learning Objectives: The students will be able to:

Identify and describe the focus and subject matter of the artworks
Explain the ways in which potential directions contributed to the development and refinement of artworks
Provide visual evidence of selected potential directions used to develop the artworks
Explain further refinement to the potential directions in order to develop the artworks
Reflect on the effectiveness of artworks to communicate ideas
Analyse how the artworks realise the communication of ideas
Discuss the refinement and presentation of artworks
Explain and evaluate how materials and techniques were applied in the artworks
Explain and evaluate how aesthetic qualities were resolved in the artworks
Evaluate the presentation of artworks
Use appropriate terminology.

Instructions:
Create an Evaluation Document.

The documentation identifies the refined focus of the folio, reflects on the communication of ideas, use of
materials and techniques, the resolution of aesthetics and the relationship between the artworks that form the
cohesive folio.

The documentation is a clear and succinct visual and written document that provides evidence of the students
reflection and evaluation of their artwork.

The written component of the Evaluation should be word-processed and may be presented as an extended
statement or short paragraphs and where appropriate may include dot points.

Visual material that must be included in the extended statement and collated prior to the commencement of the
folio, may include photographs, screen dumps or photocopies of selected potential directions from Unit 3,
School-assessed Task 1.

Students may also include sketches and plans of the proposed artworks, images, drawings and/or screen dumps
demonstrating the application of software to be used to create artworks. Annotations should accompany all the
visual material.

Potential directions may include further refinement such as maquettes, mock-ups, sketches and highly effective
plans that support the development of the finished artworks.

Assessment Criteria
The extent to which the Evaluation document demonstrates:

Very High 9-10 (A+)

Presentation of visual and written documentation includes a comprehensive description and discussion of the subject matter and focus of the
folio. Comprehensive and informative discussion of refinement or refocusing undertaken when producing finished artworks for the cohesive
folio. Thorough and informative evaluation using art language of how the finished artworks reflect the potential directions. Clear and
comprehensive evaluation using art language of how finished artworks were produced and presented and how relationships between them
were established. Comprehensive and informative explanation using art language of how materials and techniques and aesthetic qualities to
communicate and/or resolve ideas have been applied. Highly reflective discussion using art language on how ideas have been
communicated, resolved and realised in all of the finished artworks.

(Original Source: VCCA. Amended by: Heidi Wolfenden)

Submission requirements:
Submit a written document in PDF format. (Including relevant images)
Include your surname in the file title. For example: wolfendenevaluation.pdf
Submit PDF electronically on or prior to the 24th October 2017.