You are on page 1of 2

List supply chain down to

the source of the issue


Issue number:

(eCIMS Number)

Supplier: Tier 1 / Tier 2 / Tier 3 / etc

Date of issue:

Part / Process: Part Name/Description


Issue description (i.e., What was wrong with the part when received by Chrysler?)

Permanent Corrective Actions

This is the problem statement or customer


complaint. It needs to have a object and
defect.
Use this path for the specific
nonconformance being
investigated:
- How was the defect
produced?
- How did the problem occur?

Therefore

Specific
Therefore

Why

Use this path to investigate


why the problem was not
detected:
- How did the controls fail?
- How did the problem
escape?

You may find that you do not need to fill


in all six boxes down a leg. You may get
to the root cause in three boxes, you
may need to add boxes to this form. The
important thing to remember is to drill
down to the root cause.
Therefore

Why
Therefore

Detection

Therefore

Therefore

Why
Use this path to investigate
the systemic root cause:
- Why did the possibility exist
for this situation to occur?

Therefore

Systemic

Therefore

Why

Therefore

Why

The most important


thing to remember is
each box must
answer "why?" to
the previous box.

Why

Why

Therefore

Why

Therefore

Why

To test your 3L5W, read it


backwards, from the bottom up
using "therefore" between each
box instead of "why". If its
written correctily it will makes
sense.

Therefore

(Specific root cause feeds


into start of detection leg)
Root Cause

Therefore

Why

Therefore

Why

(Detection root cause


feeds into start of systemic
leg)

Timing

List the
corrective actions
that will be or
have been made
to correct this
issue and prevent
it from occurring
again.
You should have
at least 1
corrective action
for each of the
three legs. Make
sure you have
timing.
Please keep the file that you
upload into the eCIMS system
an Excel file type. This
enables me to better
communicate back to you
issues/concerns/questions that
I have about your 3L5W.

Root Cause

Therefore

Why

Read Across Actions

Use this area to explain the how information gained from this issue is being applied across your plant (or supplier's plant) as well as your other (their other) locations
that make similar parts/components for Chrysler and/or Fiat. We may have the opportunity to prevent the issue from happening at another facility.

Root Cause
Timing

Lessons Learned Summary

Timing for all items (CAP, Read


Across, Lessons Learned) to be
completed.

What did you, your team, your company or your


supplier learn from this issue and how is it being
used to prevent the issue from happening again.
Was it added to a Lessons Learned database or
Master PFMEA? How do you prevent future
"generations" from repeating the same mistake?

Chrysler 3-Legged 5 Why Analysis


Issue number: (eCIMS Number)

Date of issue:

Supplier:
Part / Process:

Issue description (i.e., What was wrong with the part when received by Chrysler or what was the Customer complaint?)

Permanent Corrective Actions

Therefore

Specific

Therefore

Why
Therefore

Therefore

Why

Detection

Therefore

Why
Therefore

Therefore

Why

Why
Therefore

Why

Root Cause

Therefore

Therefore

Systemic

Why
Therefore

Therefore

Why

Why
Therefore

Why

Root Cause
Therefore

Why
Therefore

Why

Root Cause
Read Across Actions

Timing

Lessons Learned Summary

Timing

You might also like