Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10457-015-9857-z
Received: 8 June 2015 / Accepted: 4 October 2015 / Published online: 15 October 2015
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015
and 1.42 Mg ha-1, respectively. Mulch addition significantly increased all measures of coffee growth and
yield over 2 years, except for average bean weight.
Where space is available or shade is undesirable, a cutand-carry mulching system using Leucaena-KX2 can
increase soil C and N and achieve coffee yields similar
to or greater than other full-sun systems.
Keywords Coffee yield Mulching Full-sun grown
coffee Soil carbon and nitrogen Carbon
sequestration Leucaena-KX2 Surface-soil CO2
efflux
Introduction
Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) is a cash crop of
major economic importance in Hawaii and many other
countries (Bates 1997; Steiman 2008; Valos-Sartorio
and Blackman 2010). Studies of coffee production
have long focused on the factors that help maintain
high yields (Bates 1997; Bittenbender and Smith
1999) because many small farmers depend on production levels for their livelihood. In Hawaii, as
elsewhere, this has resulted in standard recommendations for high rates of fertilizer input and supplemental
irrigation in most coffee-growing areas (Bittenbender
and Smith 1999). Although readily available and
relatively affordable for Hawaiis growers, inorganic
fertilizers in many coffee-growing regions are scarce
and costly for small farms with low levels of outside
123
326
123
Rainfall (mm)
1600
30
Annual rainfall
Average temperature
Max. temperature
Min. temperature
28
1200
26
800
24
400
22
Temperature(C)
2000
327
20
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Year
1*
3*
6*
8*
* Mulch addition
2m
4m
6m
123
328
Table 1 Leucaena-KX2 mulch, C and N additions (g kg-1 and Mg ha-1) and their standard error (SE)
Year
Dry mass
Mg ha
Carbon
-1
SE
-1
g kg
Nitrogen
-1
SE
Mg ha
SE
g kg-1
SE
Mg ha-1
SE
2005*
17.60
0.83
423
1.78
7.45
0.26
9.02
0.50
0.16
0.01
2006
24.33
0.42
414
1.68
9.97
0.67
8.60
0.67
0.19
0.04
2007
26.77
0.65
421
1.60
11.24
0.13
7.00
0.35
0.18
0.03
Date of application
Rate
ZnSO4
5 % solution
Urea (46-0-0)
50 g plot-1
Sequestrene (Fe2O3)
July 26,2006
14.20 %
10 cm
6
50 cm
12
123
329
Table 3 Initial soil characteristics and their standard error (SE) in a full-sun coffee plot at the CTAHR Waimanalo Station
Soil depth (cm)
020
SE
2040
SE
4060
SE
60100
SE
pH
6.15
0.26
6.2
1.17
6.35
1.16
6.4
0.18
BD (Mg m-3)
1.25
0.14
1.28
0.12
1.33
0.21
1.35
0.07
C (g kg)
15.5
1.74
11.1
0.64
8.9
1.15
4.8
0.19
N (g kg-1)
1.1
0.17
0.9
0.23
0.7
0.12
ND
0.88
P (mg kg-1)
84
8.37
43
1.73
34
2.31
21
K (mg kg-1)
383
11.55
192
6.93
180
17.32
98
2.51
Ca (mg kg-1)
2716
145.29
2878
115.47
2787
75.33
2962
35.88
Mg (mg kg-1)
1066
57.74
1144
184.75
1224
127.02
1334
18.44
C:N
14:01
12:01
12:01
ND
Sand (%)
8.7
13.7
11.4
11.4
Silt (%)
45.2
40.7
43.8
43.8
Clay (%)
46.1
45.6
44.8
44.8
BD bulk density
Total content of C
2008
Leaf N (%)
SE
Leaf N (%)
SE
No-mulch
2.01
0.86
2.21
1.03
Mulch
2.39
1.15
2.52
0.90
123
330
Statistical analysis
1.0
y = e-0.099t
R2 = 0.96
P < 0.01
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
10
12
Time (months)
100
-0.090t
y=e
2
80
N remaining (%)
R = 0.95
P < 0.01
Col 1 vs Col 2
60
40
20
123
0
0
10
12
Time (months)
Results
Mass loss and N mineralization
Dry mass loss of mulch after 1 year was 64 % and fit a
first-order decay curve (Fig. 4). Throughout the
decomposition period, N was mineralized from the
mulch. Mulch N declined significantly between
months 0 to 3 and 6 to 12 (Fig. 5).
100
331
hemicellulose
cellulose
lignin
ash
80
60
40
20
0
0
12
Time (months)
Fig. 6 Mass loss from mulch biochemical components in fullsun coffee system
Table 5 Significance of mass loss and changes in proportion
of mulch biochemical components over time
Component
Time (mo)
03
36
612
CHO
HEM
ns
CEL
LIG
*
*
*
*
*
*
CHO
ns
HEM
ns
CEL
ns
LIG
Mass loss
Proportion of mass
* Significant at P \ 0.017
ns not significant at same level, CHO soluble carbohydrates,
HEM hemicellulose, CEL cellulose, LIG lignin
Biochemical composition
Mass loss among the major biochemical components
in the mulch varied over time (Fig. 6). There was
significant loss of all components from months 03
and 612 (P \ 0.017, Table 5). There was a significant loss of both lignin and cellulose for all time
contrasts. In absolute terms, the most mass loss was in
the soluble fraction (Fig. 6). There were also small but
significant shifts in the proportion of each component
in the mass remaining (Table 5). The initial
Soil C and N
Soil %C and %N increased from 2006 to 2008 in both
the mulch and no-mulch treatments (Table 7). The
increases in %C and %N were significant in the mulchaddition treatment but not in the no-mulch treatment.
In both treatments, soil bulk density in the top 20 cm
declined significantly from 2006 to 2008 (Table 7).
This affected calculations of total soil C and N. In the
mulch-addition treatment, soil C still increased significantly by 2.90 Mg ha-1, but the increase in soil N
was not significant. For the no-mulch treatment, total
soil C declined significantly by 6.80 Mg ha-1 despite
no significant change in soil %C. When compared to
each other, soil C and N in 2008 were both
significantly greater in the mulch than the no-mulch
treatment.
123
332
Table 6 Changes in % of carbon, nitrogen and lignin concentrations and the C:N and lignin:N ratios of tree mulch
Months
C (%)
SE
N (%)
SE
C:N
Lignin (%)
SE
Lignin:N
51.22
2.07
1.03
0.08
50:1
13.23
2.50
13:1
43.25
2.96
0.98
0.09
44:1
12.10
2.52
12:1
6
9
39.13
36.66
2.53
1.34
0.93
0.89
0.18
0.16
42:1
41:1
10.63
9.85
1.82
1.35
11:1
11:1
12
34.15
2.35
0.85
0.12
40:1
8.84
1.79
Time
10:1
*
Year
Year
No mulch
Mulch
No mulch
SE
Mulch
SE
2006
1.26
1.25
2006
3.83
0.52
3.90
0.46
2008
0.93
0.90
2008
3.30
0.88
4.65
1.23
Change
-0.33
-0.35
Change
-0.53
0.75*
2006
45.6
45.6
2006
14.77
0.75
15.04
1.30
2008
38.8
48.50
2008
12.73
1.03
17.93
0.90
Change
-6.80*
2.9
Change
-2.04
2006
2.5
2.5
2008
Change
2.4
-0.1
3.92
1.42*
2.89*
123
333
Table 9 Growth and yield characteristics of coffee plants
based on mulch and no mulch treatments in 2007 and 2008
A
35
No mulch
30
mulch
SE
2007
25
20
17.32b
0.47
29.60a
0.81
Plant H (cm)
108b
0.84
166.50a
1.53
15
60.80a
1.01
64a
1.94
10
Yield (g)/tree
250.03b
1.77
407.36a
1.25
Fruit/node
8.14b
0.33
15.55a
0.57
Nodes/lateral
11.54b
0.40
18.55a
1.03
Laterals/stem
18.22b
0.86
28.44a
0.81
16.14a
0.66
17.90a
0.98
29.70b
0.98
39.79a
0.75
Plant H (cm)
157.80b
0.96
205a
1.32
60.20b
1.30
68.25a
1.34
Yield (g)/tree
344.80b
1.55
855.35a
1.35
Fruit/node
Nodes/lateral
9.01b
14.50b
0.83
1.80
19.42a
25.34a
0.40
0.31
Laterals/stem
22.25b
0.95
31.44a
1.05
16.62b
1.15
18.80a
0.72
B
5
SE
2008
No-mulch
Mulch
0
01:00:00
05:00:00
09:00:00
13:00:00
17:00:00
21:00:00
01:00:00
Daily time
Means in the same row with the same letters in each year are
not significantly different based on Tukeys Studentized Range
(HSD) Test
Discussion
Mulch decay and changes in soil C
Mass loss of the added Leucaena mulch fit a first-order
exponential decline curve, similar to other studies of
fine litter decay (Kumar and Deepu 1992; Jama and
Nair 1996; Pereira et al. 1998) including Leucaena
leucocephala (Budelman 1988; Jamaludheen and
Kumar 1999) and Leucaena-KX2 in a shaded coffee
agroecosystem in Hawaii (Youkhana and Idol 2009).
The initial rapid decay phase is typical on the order of
24 months. The second phase is characterized by the
gradual loss of litter mass and can take many months
for complete decay. Although this pattern has generally been identified for leaves and other fine litter, we
found a similar pattern for the chipped tree pruning
residues of the Leucaena-KX2, which included a
mixture of leaves, seed pods, branches and orthotropic
shoots from the main stem (Youkhana and Idol 2009).
The actual and modeled decomposition rates in this
study were lower than in the previous study by
123
334
123
2006
availability of easily degraded components like soluble carbohydrates provides sufficient energy to drive
decomposition of all major fractions. The preferential
loss of this soluble fraction then limits decay of the
more recalcitrant lignin and cellulose components
later on. This is despite a pattern of decreasing litter
C:N and lignin:N ratios over time. The general lack of
depletion of the soluble fraction or build-up of
recalcitrant fractions in the leucaena mulch suggests
the potential for continued rapid decay, but the
decomposition pattern over 12 months clearly demonstrates a slowing of the decay rate after the first
6 months.
Similar to Youkhana and Idol (2009), addition of
mulch in the full-sun system increased soil C after
2 years compared to the no-mulch plots. The decline
in soil bulk density in the top 20 cm (0.35 Mg m-3)
reduced the calculated total soil C and N. However,
this was similar for both treatments; thus, the relative
differences are still valid. The treatment difference of
10 Mg ha-1 is equivalent to approx. 20 % of the C
added as mulch over 2 years. Youkhana and Idol
(2009) found that over 3 years, the increase in soil C in
a shaded coffee system accounted for 38 % of the
added mulch C. Longer-term studies suggest a
1015 % annual rate of sequestration can be maintained for at least 1020 years (Fassbender 1998).
Given the rapid mulch decay and increases in soil C
and N in Youkhana and Idol (2009), significant
increases in soil CO2 efflux in the present study were
anticipated. The deposition of abundant and easily
decomposable, nitrogen-rich litter is known to result in
increased soil atmospheric CO2 concentrations
(McLain and Ahmann 2008) and soil respiration
(RSoil), e.g. under Prosopis spp. (Potts et al. 2008). In
our study, CO2 efflux increased gradually over time,
reflecting the effect of mulch decay on total soil
organic matter and cycling activity rather than direct
mulch C mineralization (Fig. 9). Mean annual efflux
in 2008 in the mulch-addition plots was significantly
greater than in 2006 and greater than efflux in the nomulch plots (Table 8). Daily and monthly variation
followed temperature patterns (Figs. 8, 9). Analyzing
data from 2007 and 2008, mulch C loss via decomposition in 2008 alone is estimated at 10.06 Mg ha-1.
Assuming the difference in CO2 flux between treatments in 2008 is primarily due to the addition of
mulch, these account for 5.1 Mg ha-1or just over
50 % of the mulch C added in 2008. Assuming the
2007
0
6
2008
No-mulch
Mulch
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
335
123
336
Conclusions
Leucaena mulch added to full-sun coffee decayed
rapidly and mineralized significant amounts of N over
a 12-month decomposition period based on site
climate and micro-climate factors. The combination
of a humid tropical climate and moderate to high litter
quality likely accounted for these patterns. Mass loss
occurred in all major biochemical components,
including lignin and cellulose. Decay of this material
on the top of 20 cm of soil also resulted in greater soil
C and N and higher soil CO2 efflux compared to nomulch plots. Carbon sequestration in soil organic
matter was *20 % of added mulch. Coffee yields
were twice as high in the mulch-addition plots, even
though equivalent amounts of inorganic N were
applied to no-mulch plots. The results of this study,
therefore, confirm the potential of a cut-and-carry
system of Leucaena-KX2 mulch to enhance the yield,
soil C and fertility of full-sun coffee production in
Hawaii.
References
Adu-Daaph HK, Cobbina J, Asare EO (1994) Effect of cocoa
pod ash on the growth of maize. J Agric Sci Cambr
132:3133
123
337
Potts DL, Scott RL, Cable JM, Huxman TE, Williams DG
(2008) Sensitivity of Mesquite Shruband CO2 exchange to
precipitation in contrasting landscape settings. Ecology
89:29002910
Rayer AJ, Chiroma MC (1990) Response of onion (Allium cepa
L.) to application of farm yard manure and mineral fertilizer on a semi-arid savanna soils of North Eastern Nigeria.
Paper presented at 18th annual conference of soil science
society of Nigeria, Maiduguri, November, 1990
SAS Institute Inc. (1990) SAS/STAT users guide. Version 9.4th
ed. SAS Institute Inc, Cary
Snoeck J (1961) Lamelioration des method esculturales du
cafeierdArabie a Mulungu. Bull Inf INEAC 10:5368
Steiman SR (2008) Shade coffee in Hawaii-quality, physiology,
and biochemistry. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hawaii at
Manoa
Steiman S, Idol T, Bittenbender H, Gautz L (2011) Shade coffee
in Hawaii-exploring some aspects of quality, growth, yield,
and nutrition. Sci Hortic 128:152158
Swaider JM, Moor A (2002) SPAD-chlorophyll response to
nitrogen fertilization and evaluation of nitrogen status in
dryland and irrigated pumpkins. J Plant Nutr
25:10891100
Titilayo EO (1982) The evaluation of various types of organic
wastes as sources of nutrient for growth and yield of maize.
Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, pp 1080
Vaast P, Bertrand B, Guyot B, Genard M (2006) Fruit thinning
and shade improve bean characteristics and beverage
quality of coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) under optimal conditions. J Sci Food Agric 86(2):197204
Valos-Sartorio BA, Blackman A (2010) Agroforestry price
supports as a conservation tool: Mexican shade coffee.
Agrofor Syst 78:169183
vonEnde CH (1993) Repeated-measures analysis: Growth and
other time-dependent measures. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 113137
Wendt JW, Jones RB, Bunderson WT, Itimu OA (1996) Leucaena ? maize alley cropping in Malawi. Part 2: Residual
P and leaf management effects on maize nutrition and soil
properties. Agrofor Syst 33:295305
Wintgens JN (2004) Coffee: growing, processing, sustainable
production. A guide for growers, traders, and researchers.
WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co.KGaA, Weinheim
Youkhana A, Idol T (2009) Tree pruning mulch increases soil C
and N in a shaded coffee agroecosystem in Hawaii. Soil
Biol Biochem 41:25272534
Youkhana A, Idol T (2011) Addition of Leucaena-KX2 mulch
in a shaded coffee agroforestry system increases both
stable and labile soil C fractions. Soil Biol Biochem
43:961966
Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management, 2nd edn.
CAB International, Wallingford
Yunianto YD (1986) Overbearing dieback on Arabica coffee.
J Pel Parkebu 2(2):6065
Zhang CF, Meng FR, Bhatti JS, Trofymow JA, Arp P (2008)
Modeling forest litter decomposition and N mineralization
rates in leaf-litterbags, placed across Canada: a 5-model
comparison. Ecol Model 219:342360
123