Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PAGE 1
CONTENTS
Section 1 Packing and Unpacking Shipping Containers and Enclosed trailers
An Introduction
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 5
Page 7
Page 9
Section 2
Comparative Chart
Pages 10-12
Pages 13-14
Pages 15-18
Pages 19-22
Pages 23-25
Supporting Documents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Glossary of Terms
Finding and fixing health and safety problems
Examples of Mechanical Aids
Suggested Dock Length using Different Loading Equipment
What Duties do Employers, Employees and Contractors Have?
Further Information & Contact the Victorian W orkCover Authority
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 32
PAGE 2
SECTION 1
PACKING AND UNPACKING SHIPPING CONTAINERS and
ENCLOSED TRAILERS
A Manual Handling Blackspot
An Introduction
Packing and unpacking shipping containers and pantechnicons (enclosed semi-trailers) is a
manual handling blackspot associated with severe sprain or strain injuries.
An analysis of WorkCover claims data indicates that from July 1999 to May 2002 there were 289
standard claims and 366 minor claims in Victoria as a result of packing and unpacking shipping
containers and enclosed trailers. These injuries occurred across manufacturing, construction,
retail, transport, storage and labour hire industries and cost those industries $9.2 million with the
average claim being $31,900.
For workers, this type of injury can mean pain and discomfort affecting not only their work but
their everyday lives, families and relationships. For employers, these injuries may lead to
WorkCover claims and increased premiums, as well as the disruption of having staff unable to
work.
Much can be done to manage the hazards that cause these injuries.
PAGE 3
WorkSafes guidance material is published to assist employers and others to understand their
duties and, in many cases, to provide specific guidance on how hazards and risks may be
controlled. The guidance material does not add to or change the duties imposed by the
Occupational Health and Safety Act or its Regulations. The material does not have the same
status as a Code of Practice approved by the Minister under the Occupational Health and Safety
Act.
Such guidance material is one of many sources of information that contributes to the state of
knowledge about a hazards and risk and the ways of removing or mitigating the hazard and risk;
this is one of the planks of the definition of practicable which qualifies the extent to which an
employers obligation under provisions such as section 21 of the Occupational Health and Safety
Act must be met.
An employer should have regard to any relevant published guidance material when addressing
hazards and risks. However, information in published guidance material, including material
published by WorkSafe, is not necessarily the only way in which a hazard or risk may be
adequately addressed. An employer may choose to use other effective control measures in order
to satisfy his or her regulatory duties.
PAGE 4
As the following example shows, the lack of safe work practices can have tragic consequences
and result in court convictions and serious penalties for those who fail to provide a safe
workplace.
Two employees of the defendant company were removing timber shoring struts from within a shipping
container. The shoring was supporting a load of marble sheeting. The load shifted without warning, trapping
one employee and causing fatal injuries. The second employee received minor injuries.
In passing sentence, Magistrate Max Cashmore noted that the Act places obligations on companies, such as
the Australian Marble Company; to assess a load like the one they were faced with in this case before
unpacking. It was unsafe for the company to unload in this manner on this occasion. The employees lacked
the necessary information, instruction, training and supervision. The circumstances clearly called for close
inspection. The failure to undertake a proper assessment led to horrific consequences. The Magistrate
considered this a fairly flagrant breach of the Act and noted that the supporting structure (provided by the
US suppliers) was inadequate. He gave the company some credit, given that they had promoted a different
method of packaging since this incident.
Magistrate Cashmore further stated that he would take into account of the fact that it was a small company
with a previous good record, and that the individuals behind the company had contributed extensively to the
community and had a good record.
PAGE 5
INJURY STATISTICS
Source: Victorian WorkCover Authority claims data July 1999 to May 2002.
Analysis of WorkCover claims data indicates that from July 1999 until May 2002, 60%
(173) of all Victorian standard claims resulting from packing and unpacking shipping
containers and enclosed trailers were in the transport and storage industry. Truck,
delivery and forklift drivers together with store-persons suffered over half those injuries.
In Victoria, 70% (201) of all claims resulting from packing and unpacking shipping
containers and enclosed trailers were associated with a sprain or strain injury and 9%
(27) resulted in a fracture or dislocation.
These claims cost Victorian industry $9.2 million with an average claims cost of $31,943.
19% (55) of container packing and unpacking related claims in the transport, storage and
trade industry of this nature result in long periods off work typically, more than 50 days.
A breakdown of the activities causing the injuries, based upon analysis of claims details,
is as follows:
ACTIVITY
Access to/from Container
Forklift incidents
Packing/unpacking
*Preparing container
TOTAL
TOTAL COST
NUMBER OF
CLAIMS
AVERAGE
COST
$411,679
24
$17,153
8%
$54,085
$7,641,344
$1,124,324
$9,231,432
4
208
53
289
$13,521
$36,737
$21,214
$31,943
1%
72%
18%
100%
Percentages
*Preparing container includes opening and closing doors and operating trailer landing legs.
PAGE 6
Transporting items to rear of the container Items are selected and moved into the
container as close to the loading face as possible. The packing starts at the rear of the
container and the moves to the front until the entire container is full.
Stacking items within container Items are stacked firstly on one row on the floor at
the rear of the container. Items are stacked on top of this first row until there is no more
space at the top so the loading face is full and the next row is started. This continues until
the container is full. If items can be stepped on, a row may be started before the loading
face is full so that the top of the container can be reached.
Removing goods from stacks within the container Items are removed from the
loading face within the container. The front face is removed first which then exposes the
next stack and this continues until the container is empty. If items can be stepped on, the
bottom row may stay until the top of the next stack is removed.
Stacking goods onto pallets Once items are removed from the loading face they can
be stacked onto a pallet for later storage or transport.
Transport of goods out of container Items not removed using mechanical aids are
carried out of the container by hand.
Other tasks Actions may be required to secure or release load binders or to install or
remove false floors within the container. Actions may also be required to open or close
doors and locking systems and to install or remove barriers or nets placed inside doors to
protect persons opening the doors.
Bagged products
Long items such as sheets of plasterboard, timber packs, carpet rolls and lengths of steel
Unstable loads that need to be secured from movement such as partially filled drums
Awkward heavy loads such as granite and marble, steel billets and rolls
PAGE 7
Risk of injury
The possible injury risk associated with these activities is increased by the following factors:
Awkward postures e.g. to stack or remove items from above shoulder height or below
knee height, to fit items into spaces to utilise all space within the container, to stack items
on pallets.
Sustained movement e.g. to carry items in and out of the container, to climb over items
to reach the top of the container.
Repetitive application of force e.g. to stack items on pallet or in container, to carry items
in and out of container, to push trolleys in and out of container.
Long duration e.g. packing, unpacking or stacking pallets for more than half an hour at
a time or more than two hours over the whole day.
High force actions involving a large amount of physical force; e.g. lifting heavy or
awkward items, pushing trolley or hand pallet jack on a slope, removing items wedged
into crevices.
Environmental conditions e.g. weather, such as cold or hot conditions and rain, and
uneven, loose or slippery floors.
The frequency of handling also affects the potential of being injured. The occasional movement of
a single large or awkward item places people at risk of a sprain or strain injury. More frequent
handling of such items will increase the risk further.
Sources of risk
In the packing and unpacking of containers and enclosed trailers, there are a number of sources
of risk. These are detailed in the Case Studies starting at page 13.
Packing and unpacking items from other types of vehicles or from refrigerated containers is not
covered in this document. The legal obligations of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985
and the Occupational Health and Safety (Manual Handling) Regulations 1999 still apply in these
situations.
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
SECTION 2
The Comparative Chart is a summary of identified hazards and
an assessment of risks in the packing and unpacking of
shipping containers and enclosed trailers. The main
components of packing and unpacking have been colour coded
according to the risk.
The practices in the green column
should be regarded as the target
for all workplaces.
The values in the Comparative Chart are based upon the situations in the Case Studies and
provide guidance as to the level of risk in those situations. If applying the values to other
situations, variations of up to 10% may be considered as attaining a similar level of risk.
Employers, health and safety representatives and employees should cooperate to determine
what risks are actually present in the workplace. A decision then has to be made, from the results
of the risk assessment, as to what is practicable for the workplace. If the practices in the red
column are being used, an attempt should be made to implement one or more of the practices in
the green column straight away. If that is not practicable, corresponding practices in the amber
column should be put in place as an interim solution until such time as one or more control from
the green column can be implemented.
If the risk controls implemented involve the use of any manual handling technique or the use of a
mechanical aid, ensure that information, training or instruction is provided together with
appropriate supervision, in accordance with Section 21(2) (e) of the Occupational Health and
Safety Act 1985 and Part 13.5 of the Manual Handling Code of Practice.
In summary, try following these steps:
1. Look at the practices in the workplace.
2. Find where these practices fit in the Comparative Chart. (pages 10-12)
3. Consider the options of how to move towards the green.
4. Compare your situation with the Case Studies. (pages 13-25)
5. Implement the changes necessary to achieve a safe workplace.
PAGE 10
PACKING /
UNPACKING
Hand packing/unpacking in
comfortable temperatures with
continuous airflow
- recommended controls
Bags,
Boxes or
Cartons
GLOW RISK):
RED (HIGH RISK):
PAGE 11
PACKING/
UNPACKING
Heavy or
Problematic
Objects
Handling
False floor
Handling
Container
door
Preparing
trailer
Hydraulic or pneumatic
operation of trailer landing legs.
Packing/unpacking of container
on trailer without landing legs,
trailer stand or other system in
place to prevent the trailer
tipping or otherwise becoming
unstable.
Packing/unpacking of container
on trailer at loading dock where
there is no system to stop the
trailer moving from the loading
dock due to vehicles and
equipment entering the
container or from being driven
away from the loading dock
during packing/unpacking.
Securing
Load
Packing/unpacking of container
using forklift or other such
mechanical handling device
without consideration of whether
the floor of the container will
sustain the weight of the
mechanical handling device and
the load.
PAGE 12
SECTION 3
CASE STUDIES
How to use this Section
This chapter looks at the full range of activities involved in packing and unpacking
shipping containers and enclosed trailers.
Case Studies describe three common types of objects, their identified risk factors and
recommended control solutions.
Each Case Study includes information under the following headings:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Activity Description;
Risk Assessment;
Sources of Risk; and
Solutions - Good Practices to reduce risk of Injury/Options for Risk Control
Packaged chemicals in shipping containers may lead to unsafe atmospheres within the
container, should leakage or seepage occur. The nature of this risk may require persons
packing or unpacking to wear personal protective equipment, such as impervious coveralls
and respirators, which may increase their risk of injury during manual handling.
The hazards of chemicals are covered in other WorkSafe Victoria guidance documents.
Fumigation
Chemicals used in fumigation, to prevent pests and diseases spreading between states or
countries, may be a risk to the health of people unpacking containers if they have not been
cleared or chemical residues are present.
Traffic Management
Traffic management risks exist when forklifts, cranes, pallet movers, prime movers and
other vehicles are operating where pedestrians are present.
No persons should be inside a shipping container or enclosed trailer with a forklift
operating.
There are specific hazards with the use of forklifts that are covered in other WorkSafe
Victoria guidance documents.
Vehicle Emissions
Petrol, diesel and LP Gas powered forklifts and trucks give out a range of hazardous
exhaust emissions. There is a risk of fume build up and the potential for oxygen depletion
during packing or unpacking.
Crush injuries
Heavy, awkward items and equipment pose a serious risk if they topple or fall during
transit, packing or unpacking.
Persons opening doors are particularly at risk of being hit by unrestrained items.
Cold storage
Risks associated with work in the cold should be addressed if the container is refrigerated
or is stored in a cold environment.
Heat
Containers exposed to the sun can store that heat and pose a risk to persons unloading.
Persons under
There is a risk of loads dropping or falling. Loads must never be suspended above people.
PAGE 13
suspended loads
People loading or unloading must not work under false floors supporting a load.
Lack of induction and communication with contract staff from labour hire companies may
introduce risk through inadequate knowledge and supervision in safe systems of work.
Stability of Container
Stability and suitability of trailer legs during packing and unpacking need to be addressed
or there is a risk of container toppling or the trailer collapsing.
Falling from the load, dock, ramp or from the container or enclosed trailer is always a risk
of injury. A slip, trip or fall when manually handling a heavy and awkward object or climbing
to reach those objects is also a risk.
PAGE 14
CASE STUDY 1:
PACKING & UNPACKING OF SMALL BAGS, BOXES AND
CARTONS
This case study will be referring to cartons and boxes used for things like tins of food (packages
in the 2 kg to 50 kg range) and bags that hold products like flour, stock feed and cement.
Risk Assessment
A risk assessment conducted under the Manual Handling Regulations on these activities
established that there is a risk due to repetitive awkward postures, sustained movement, high
force, environmental conditions, and repetitive application of force.
SOURCE OF RISK
DETAILS
Workplace layout
Design and Safe Working Load of loading dock may prevent the use of forklifts or other such
equipment to load or unload containers (see solution l).
Height difference between loading dock and container floor will require high forces to push
mechanical aids during packing (see solutions g, i, j & t).
Loading dock which has no steps or safe access means that the driver must climb onto it
using awkward postures (see solution n).
Long distance between the loading face and the pallet results in an item being held or carried
for a long duration (see solutions c, e & o).
Poor workplace layout or housekeeping may mean that repetitive awkward postures and high
forces are adopted when carrying items or using mechanical aids around or over obstructions
(see solution s).
PAGE 15
Stacking items to the roof of the container may mean that awkward postures and high forces
are used to reach items at the top of stacks (see solutions e & f).
Bag/sack/carton design
Items not loaded on pallets or slip sheets prevents their unloading by mechanical aids
(see solutions a, b, d & h).
Lack of handles or poor placement of handles will require higher force to handle item
(see solutions a, b & m).
Weight and size of item will determine postures and forces to be used. Heavier or larger
items require greater force and more awkward postures (see solutions a, b, d, m & r).
Type of material stored in bags affects the ease of handling e.g. flour and plastic beads
form a semi-solid object that is difficult to handle due to its instability while other material
such as cement, sand and salts can be firmer and stable when handled (see solutions a,
b, c & d).
Objects with unstable contents or where the centre of gravity is not central can be difficult
to handle. Lifting or carrying the heavier side of an object away from the body poses a
risk as does handling an unstable object (see solutions a, b, d, m & q).
Mixed loads
Packing or unpacking of small items on top of heavy large items where access to the top layer
cannot be gained by standing on items stored on the floor requires high force to be exerted in
awkward postures to reach these top items ( see solutions a, b, d, e & f).
If mechanical aids are not available then awkward postures and high force loads are adopted
to lift, carry, push or stack items (see solutions a, b, c, d, e, f, m, q & r).
Lack of maintenance of mechanical aids can mean that higher forces are needed to operate
them or they cannot be used at all and less safe methods of handling are used (see solutions r
& t).
Damaged or rusty container doors or locks will require high force to open and close (see
solutions q & t).
Using a hand pallet truck without brakes to move loads on a ramp may require the use of high
force (see solution u).
Work organisation
Delivery and loading schedules which impose a strict time limit on manual packing or
unpacking of items will increase the handling frequency and increase the amount of fast and
jerky movements (see solution z).
Not enough competent persons available to assist with handling (see solution r & q).
Work/rest cycles do not allow persons to recover sufficiently from the work undertaken (see
solution v).
Amount of work done over the shift leads to physical exhaustion (see solution w).
Task design
Packing small cartons or bags by hand instead of using mechanical loading of bulk bags or
palletised loads (see solutions a, b, d, e & m).
Sequence of packing may lead to difficulties when unpacking e.g. mixing small and large
items throughout the container may mean that conveyors cannot be used to unload (see
solution cc)
Inappropriate container selected for the items to be loaded (see solution h).
If task requires unnecessary multiple lifting, pushing, carrying, or other handling, then
repetitive awkward postures and forces are used (see solutions a, b, c, d, e, f & m).
Packing or unpacking in restricted space may require uneven, fast or jerky forces (see
solutions a, b, d, m, p & q).
Physical environment
Ramp angle determines the force needed to push or pull hand pallet jacks or trolleys. A large
angle may also preclude the use of a particular mechanical aid such as an electric walkerstacker as it may `bottom-out as it goes over the end of the ramp (see solutions g, j, h, l & u).
Handling items over floor surfaces that are uneven, damaged, sloped and sometimes wet and
slippery will expose persons to sudden and unexpected forces (see solution s & u).
Lack of instruction in how to minimise risk by using the appropriate equipment, procedures
and techniques during this task (see solution q).
If the bag or sack is lifted flat, the worker cannot get the load close to the body, which
increases the risk. If a bag or sack is picked up and carried on end, then the hands, arms and
shoulders predominantly support the weight. The risk of injury increases if loads are handled
with smaller muscle groups (see solution q).
PAGE 16
Other Risks
PAGE 17
The manual handling risks associated with this situation include repetitive awkward postures, sustained
movement, high forces, environmental conditions and repetitive application of force. Options for risk control
include providing a powered conveyor to deliver goods to and from loading face, stacking goods on a slip-sheet
and loading or unloading using an electric forklift with push-pull attachment.
PAGE 18
CASE STUDY 2:
PACKING AND UNPACKING OF LARGE ITEMS
This case study will be dealing with packages containing large items such as whitegoods, electrical
goods and furniture. The packages may be of individual items or may be multiple packages loaded
on a pallet or skid pallet.
Risk Assessment
A risk assessment conducted under the Manual Handling Regulations on these activities established
that there was a risk due to high force, repetitive awkward postures, sustained movement,
environmental conditions, and repetitive application of force.
PAGE 12 DELIVERING LARGE GAS CYLINDERS DELIVERING LARGE GAS CYLINDERS PAGE 13
SOURCE OF RISK
DETAILS
Workplace layout
Design and Safe Work load of loading dock may prevent the use of forklifts or other such
equipment to load or unload containers (see solution l).
Height difference between loading dock and container floor could require high forces to push
mechanical aids (see solutions d, e, j & t).
Loading dock which has no steps or safe access means that the driver must climb onto it
using awkward postures (see solution m).
Long distance between the loading face and the storage may result in items being pushed for
a long duration (see solutions a, b, c, & n).
Poor workplace layout or housekeeping may mean that repetitive awkward postures and high
forces are adopted when carrying items or using mechanical aids around or over obstructions
(see solutions o & r).
Non palletised items without lifting lugs or a skid, or of a design that cannot be handled with
grab plates, will require manual handling (see solutions a, b, h & i).
Weight and size of item will determine postures and forces to be used. Heavier or larger items
require greater force and more awkward postures to move or stack by hand (see solutions a,
b, h, i, p & q).
Objects with unstable contents or where the centre of gravity is not central can be difficult to
handle. Lifting or carrying the heavier side of an object away from the body poses a risk as
does handling an unstable object: e.g. cathode-ray televisions and monitors are heavier at the
PAGE 19
screen than at the rear, while some washing machines have concrete blocks in the base (see
solutions a, b, p, & t).
If mechanical aids are not available then awkward postures and high force loads need to be
adopted to lift, carry, push or stack items (see solutions a, b, c, f, l, p, q, s & t).
Lack of maintenance of mechanical aids or container doors can mean that higher forces are
needed to operate them or they cannot be used at all and less safe methods of handling are
used (see solution s).
Using a hand pallet truck without brakes to move loads on a ramp may require the use of high
force (see solution t).
Work organisation
Not enough competent persons available to assist with handling (see solution p & q).
Delivery and loading schedules which impose a strict time limit on manual packing or
unpacking of items will increase the handling frequency and increase the amount of fast and
jerky movements (see solution z).
Work/rest cycles do not allow persons to recover sufficiently from the work undertaken (see
solution u).
Amount of work done over the shift leads to physical exhaustion (see solution v).
Task design
Packing large items by hand instead of using mechanical loading of palletised loads poses a
risk due to high forces in awkward postures(see solutions a, b, c, f, l, p, q & t).
If task requires unnecessary multiple lifting, pushing, carrying, or other handling, then
repetitive awkward postures and forces are used (see solutions a, b, c, n, & q).
Packing or unpacking in restricted space with heavy items may require uneven, fast or jerky
forces (see solution a, b, c & i).
Physical environment
Increasing ramp angle increases the force needed to push or pull hand pallet jacks or trolleys.
A large angle may also preclude the use of a particular mechanical aid such as an electric
walker-stacker as it may `bottom-out as it goes over the end of the ramp (see solutions d, e, i,
j & t).
Handling items over floor surfaces that are uneven, damaged, sloped and sometimes wet and
slippery will expose persons to sudden and unexpected forces (see solution r & s).
Lack of instruction in how to minimise risk by using the appropriate equipment, procedures
and techniques during this task (see solution p).
Other Risks
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
PAGE 20
i)
The manual handling risks associated with this situation include awkward postures
and high forces. Options for risk control include providing objects on skids or pallets
and loading using powered mechanical equipment.
PAGE 14 DELIVERING LARGE GAS CYLINDERS DELIVERING LARGE GAS CYLINDERS PAGE 15
PAGE 21
CASE STUDY 3:
PACKING AND UNPACKING PROBLEMATIC ITEMS
This case study will be dealing with items that cant be contained within conventional packaging.
It includes long items like plasterboard sheets and carpet, unstable loads such as drums of liquid
or large irregular shaped bags, heavy material like stone slabs or rolls of steel and irregularly
shaped items such as machinery or sculpture.
Risk Assessment
A risk assessment conducted under the Manual Handling Regulations on these common industry
activities established that there was a risk due to repetitive awkward postures, high force and
environmental conditions.
SOURCE OF RISK
DETAILS
Workplace layout
Design and Safe Working Load of loading dock may prevent the use of forklifts or other such
equipment to load or unload containers (see solutions l).
Height difference between loading dock and container floor could require high forces to push
mechanical aids (see solutions d, e, k & r).
Loading dock which has no steps or safe access means that the driver must climb onto it
using awkward postures (see solution y).
Long distance between the container and the storage may result in an item being pushed or
carried for a long duration (see solutions m).
Poor workplace layout or housekeeping may mean that repetitive awkward postures and high
forces are adopted when carrying items or using mechanical aids around or over obstructions
(see solutions n & q).
Non palletised items without lifting lugs or a skid, or of a design that cannot be handled with
grab plates, will require manual handling (see solutions a, b, c, & i).
Weight and size of item will determine postures and forces to be used. Some large items are
relatively light, while others such as rolls of steel are too heavy to be manually handled by any
number of persons (see solutions a, b, c, h, i, o & p).
PAGE 22
Objects with unstable contents or where the centre of gravity is not central can be difficult to
handle. Lifting or carrying the heavier side of an object away from the body poses a risk as
does handling an unstable object (see solutions a, b, c, & h).
If mechanical aids are not available then awkward postures and high force loads need to be
adopted to lift, carry, push or stack items (see solutions a, b, c, d, e, g, h, i, j, k, l, o, p & s).
Lack of maintenance of mechanical aids or container doors can mean that higher forces are
needed to operate them or they cannot be used at all and less safe methods of handling are
used (see solution r).
Using a hand pallet truck without brakes to move loads on a ramp may require the use of high
force (see solution s).
No frame available to store problematic objects before container packing (see solution c).
Work organisation
Not enough competent persons available to assist with handling (see solutions o & p).
Delivery and loading schedules which impose a strict time limit on manual packing or
unpacking of items will increase the handling frequency and increase the amount of fast and
jerky movements (see solution z).
Task design
Packing large items by hand instead of using mechanical loading of palletised loads (see
solutions a, b, c, h, j, o, p & s).
Packing or unpacking in restricted space with heavy items may require uneven, fast or jerky
forces (see solutions a, b, c, h & n).
Physical environment
Ramp angle determines the force needed hand load or unload object. A large angle may also
preclude the use of a particular mechanical aid such as an electric walker-stacker as it may
`bottom-out as it goes over the end of the ramp (see solutions d, e, k, l & s).
Handling items over floor surfaces that are uneven, damaged, sloped and sometimes wet and
slippery will expose persons to sudden and unexpected forces (see solutions q & r).
Lack of instruction in how to minimise risk by using the appropriate equipment, procedures
and techniques during this task (see solution o).
Other Risks
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
PAGE 23
l)
t)
A TEAM LIFT IS ONLY CONSIDERED TO BE AN INTERIM CONTROL MEASURE IN THIS CASE BECAUSE:
a) Weights of most problematic items handled are in excess of the weight that can be safely handled
by each person, and
b) Object requires persons to adopt awkward postures during the lift, and
c) Technique will not require the persons to lift the entire object weight; and
d) Object might not allow the persons to get a good grip during handling; and
e) It is an administrative control that requires that additional persons be available at the loading area
which in many cases cannot be guaranteed.
PAGE 24
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms
The following terms are commonly used in the Transport and Storage sector.
Risk: the likelihood of injury or illness arising from exposure to any hazard.
Hazard: the potential to cause injury, illness or disease.
Manual Handling: means any activity requiring the use of force exerted by a person to lift, push,
pull, carry or otherwise move, hold or restrain any object.
Shipping Container: a purpose-built container with standard dimensions used for transport of
goods by road, rail or sea.
Pantechnicon: an enclosed road freight trailer with fixed sides used for the transport of goods by
road.
Fumigation: a quarantine requirement for some goods to disinfect by means of fumes to kill
insects and other pests.
Slip-sheets: cardboard or plastic sheets which can be placed under a load to enable the load to
be handled in the same way as a palletised load using a push-pull forklift attachment.
Practicable: means having regard to all the following:
(a) the severity of the hazard or risk in question;
(b) the state of knowledge about that hazard or risk and any ways of removing or mitigating
that hazard or risk;
(c) the availability and suitability of ways to remove or mitigate that hazard or risk; and
(d) the cost of removing or mitigating that hazard or risk.
This definition relates to the duties imposed in the Act. It means all of these factors must be taken into
account when determining whether the duty has been met rather than only looking at any single factor, for
example cost. In determining how to meet the requirements of a specific duty, consideration should be
given to the effect on employees, the technical feasibility and cost effectiveness of any proposed action.
Blackspot guidance relevance to practicability:
The severity of the hazard or risk in
question.
This document reflects some of the state of knowledge about the risk and
controls in place within industry to control the risk.
25
Looking at the work and the work areas: workflow, layout and how work is organised.
Using existing information: past health and safety incidents, injuries, problems and hazards that have not
been addressed need to be recognised.
Discussing possible hazards and risks with others: such as industry bodies, unions, or employer
associations.
Other sources of information: see sources of further information listed at the end of the document.
Where a hazard is found, a risk assessment must be done (refer to the Manual Handling
Regulations and Code of Practice for Manual Handling for details of how to assess the risk).
Step 2 - Eliminating or reducing the risks - Risk Control
Any risks assessed must be eliminated as far as is practicable. If risks cant be eliminated they
must be reduced as far as is practicable. Remember to consult with employees.
There is usually more than one means of reducing or eliminating the risk from a particular hazard
and more than one method may need to be used. Some general principles help when setting in
place risk controls:
When you are solving one hazard, make sure that you are not creating new hazards or making other
hazards more hazardous.
Risk controls that rely on workers doing things differently, being safety conscious, working more safely
and using personal protective equipment often dont work very well. These types of controls often
need constant supervision and training and are less effective as workers become fatigued or because
there is a constant turnover of workers.
Use one or more of the following methods to reduce risks: Substitution, Isolation, Engineering Controls.
If the risk remains after these methods have been used, administrative controls and personal
protective equipment can be used.
Workers may cut corners because of pressure to get the job done in time. They may go back to former
methods or not use new methods for other reasons.
Finding and fixing health and safety problems is more effective when properly planned. Measures to
improve health and safety are often not set and forget. Regularly consult with health and safety
representatives and other workers to see if agreed measures are still being used and are effective.
Risk controls can vary considerably in the cost, time and effort required to put them in place.
Effective risk controls can often be implemented quickly with minimum cost and effort. A
reasonable search effort often finds rewarding solutions.
26
Appendix 3:
A large range of mechanical aids are available to help reduce manual handling risks. The
photographs show some of the equipment which might be appropriate to your activities.
27
Electric pallet
truck
Electric forklift
Gas or diesel
forklift
5 cm (2 in)
1.5 m (5 ft)
10 cm (4 in)
1.5 m (5 ft)
15 cm (6 in)
-- --
2.4 m (8 ft)
1.5 m (5 ft)
20 cm (8 in)
-- --
2.4 m (8 ft)
1.5 m (5 ft)
25 cm (10 in)
-- --
2.4 m (8 ft)
30 cm (12 in)
-- --
-- --
36 cm (14 in)
-- --
-- --
-- --
41 cm (16 in)
-- --
-- --
-- --
46 cm (18 in)
-- --
-- --
-- --
Disclaimer:
The details provided in this chart are indicative only. Refer to the manufacturers specifications for the
materials handling equipment in use within your workplace. The type of ramp, environmental conditions,
speed, and other factors will also affect stability and need to be taken into account in the design and use of
dock facilities.
28
Employers have legal obligations under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (1985) and
the OH&S (Manual Handling) Regulations 1999. These include:
- to provide and maintain plant and systems of work that are so far as is practicable
safe and without risks to health; and
- to maintain so far as is practicable workplaces that are safe and without risks to
health.
If they implement effective risk management practices, they could also realise improved staff
morale and business gains.
Employers are also required under the law to consult with elected workplace health and safety
representatives when identifying hazards, assessing risks and controlling risk.
To obtain copies of these documents, call Information Victoria on telephone 1300 366 356, or visit
www.bookshop.vic.gov.au
An employer must provide employees with proper equipment, support and appropriate training.
This responsibility extends to providing a safe physical work environment, appropriate job design
and work systems.
Employees, under the Manual Handling Regulations, are required to cooperate with their
employers actions in regard to hazard identification, risk assessment and risk control.
Employees, while at work, must take reasonable care for their own health and safety and for the
health and safety of others. They must cooperate with the employers in respect to any action
taken by the employer to comply with any requirements imposed under the Occupational Health
and Safety Act.
Contractors that pack or unpack shipping containers and enclosed trailers at their own workplace
have responsibilities to their employees and any other contractors or agency personnel working
for or with them.
Contractors that supply workers to pack or unpack at another workplace have legal responsibility
for their own employees and any other contractors or agency personnel working for them. All
parties, including the owner of the load and those who have control of the workplace, should work
together to ensure that hazards are identified, risks are assessed and effective risk controls are
put into place.
29
Occupational Health and Safety (Certification of Plant Users and Operators) Regulations
1994
CODES OF PRACTICE
Relevant WorkSafe Victoria Codes of Practice:
Manual Handling (No. 25, 2000)
Plant (No. 19, 1995)
Storage and Handling of Dangerous Goods (No. 27, 2000)
Hazardous Substances (No. 24, 2000)
First Aid in the Workplace (No. 18, 1995)
Workplaces (No. 3, 1988)
Confined Spaces (no. 20, 1996)
Copies of codes of practices can be obtained by contacting WorkSafe Victoria on 03 9641 1333,
or your local WorkSafe Victoria office.
30
AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS
AS 1418.1 1994 Cranes (including hoists and winches) - General requirements
AS 1755 2000 Conveyors Safety Requirements
AS 2359.2 1985 SAA Industrial Truck Code Part 2: Operation
AS 2550.1 1993 Cranes Safe Use General Requirements
AS/NZS 2865 2001 Safe working in a confined space
Australian Standards are available from Standards Australia on 1300 654 646, or on-line at
www.standards.com.au
PAGE 26
OTHER
Other bodies provide health and safety information. An example is:
- Shipping containers: stability of 20-foot containers (from Transport Workers Union)
Available from Australian Government Info Shop (190 Queen St. Melbourne Tel. 9670 4224.):
- The Australian Code for the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Road and Rail (ADG Code)
- Load Restraint Guide VICTORIA
Refer to the following sections of the Yellow Pages for assistance:
Automation Systems &/or Equipment
Conveying & Elevating Equipment Systems
Building Consultants & Designers
Cargo Freight Containers &/or Services
Castors
Designing Engineers
Elevating Work Platforms
Engineers Consulting
Ergonomics
Forklift Trucks
Hoisting and Rigging Equipment
WORKSAFE VICTORIA
Offices
Ballarat
Bendigo
Dandenong
Geelong
Melbourne
Mildura
Mulgrave
Preston
Shepparton
Traralgon
Wangaratta
Warrnambool
Head Office -
222 Exhibition Street, Level 24, (GPO Box 4306), Melbourne Vic 3000
Tel. 9641 1555,
Fax. 9641 1222
www.workcover.vic.gov.au
Tel. 1800 136 089AGE 28 DELIVERING LARGE GAS CYLINDERS
Website:
Advisory service
31