Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
Acronyms.............................................................................................................................................. i
Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................. ii
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ iii
1. Background and Context ........................................................................................................... 1
1.1
1.2
1.3
Impact................................................................................................................................... 6
2.2
Relevance ........................................................................................................................... 17
2.3
Equity .................................................................................................................................. 18
2.4
Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... 19
2.5
Efficiency ............................................................................................................................ 21
2.6
Sustainability:................................................................................................................... 22
2.7
Replicability ....................................................................................................................... 23
3.
4.
5.
Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 34
Annexure ...............................................................................................................................................
Annex 1: Agenda for the Consultative Workshop.....................................................................
Annex 2: Focus Group Agenda .......................................................................................................
Annex 3: Survey Questionnaire .....................................................................................................
Annex 4: Respondents Profile (Sample Survey) ......................................................................
Acronyms
AF
Aurat Foundation
BISP
CAC
CCB
CSN
DCO
EDO
FAFEN
GRAP
HAP
KAP
LFA
LG
Local Government
LHV
LHW
NADRA
OGB
TEVTA
UC
Union Council
WLG
Acknowledgments
The author would like to express his gratitude to project staff at Aurat Foundation (AF)
for providing background information and making arrangements for primary data
collection. National Project Manager Asim Malik, M&E Officer Anam Khan, Regional
Manager Punjab Mumtaz Mugal, and Regional Manager Sindh Malika Khan, were most
helpful. From Oxfam GB, Dr. Noreen Khalid and Feroza Zehra took keen interest in
planning the mid-term review. The present report is a result of combined efforts of a
small but dependable team recruited for the study. The author gratefully acknowledges
the contribution of Irum Fatima, Nasuhaba Baraijo and Rabia Naseer, who conducted
the telephonic survey; and Khurram Khan and Samreen Ghauri, who documented focus
group discussions at seven different locations in three provinces. The report would not
have been possible without their hard work.
ii
Executive Summary
The mid-term review was commissioned by Oxfam Great Britain (OGB) Islamabad to
provide an independent assessment of the progress and performance of the
programme, Raising Her Voice (RHV), now into the third year of implementation. Other
objectives included in the Terms of Reference (ToRs) were to:
Measure and report on achievements and early signs of change and impact.
Review equity, relevance, efficiency and value for money, effectiveness,
sustainability and replicability.
Indicate adjustments and changes that need to be made to ensure success.
Analyse the cost effectiveness of the different approaches taken.
Review the programmes risk analysis
The present report is an outcome of desk review, primary data collection, consultation
with funding and implementing partners staff and data analysis carried out during
December 2010 and January 2011. Evaluation findings reveal that the project has had
some impact on womens lives, including those of women leaders. It has also resulted
in some changes in institutional practices at grassroots level. However, the project has
had little wider impact on laws and policies, accountability and governance at different
tiers of the government.
Volunteers involved with the project report an increase in their self-confidence to
articulate issues and initiate collective action. The role played by these women and their
male counterparts in Citizen Action Committees (CACs) to voluntarily provide rescue
and relief service to the victims of 2010 floods in Pakistan is an evidence of their
leadership potential and courage. The women leader groups (WLGs) have brought
women from across the political divide together, which in itself is an achievement in a
polarized political environment.
However, not all women involved with the project can be said to be functional and
active members of the group. The sample survey with women leaders and FGDs with
WLG and CAC office-bearers helped identify a number of problems with the composition
and functioning of the groups. While, the groups have good representation of different
ethnic groups and occupational categories, religious minorities and women with
disabilities have been inadvertently excluded. There are marked variations between the
level of participation and capacities of different groups of women within districts and
across regions. Women in their 30s and 40s appear to have participated more actively
in project activities and have relatively greater awareness of relevant rights issues and
instruments compared to the youngest age cohort i.e. 18-24 year olds. Across regions,
Southern Punjab seems ahead of other regions in terms of participation of members
and their level of knowledge and capacities. By contrast, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province
lags behind all other regions.
The projects approach of involving men in campaigning for womens rights has been
successful as it has facilitated womens access to male-dominated corridors of power
and helped them with operational and logistical issues. There is, however, an inbuilt
tension between voluntary work and paid activities. Male members are part of the
CACs, which existed prior to RHV and have expectations about financial support
informed by the experience of donor-funded work in the past.
iii
The project has been successful in facilitating a sizable number of women in acquiring
Computerised National Identity Cards (CNICs) and other documents. This can be
expected to pay significant social dividends by opening up new opportunities for women
in social and political domains. Partners have also made some headway in influencing
administrative practices at sub-district and district levels. For example, some
departments have partially implemented the Protection against Harassment at
Workplace Bill 2010 as a result of WLG and CAC efforts. One sign that local partners
have done meaningful work around the newly enacted law is that 73% women leaders
in the survey said they knew of it. The figure is more positive compared to response
pattern with regard to questions about other rights issues and instruments. District
Hyderabad in lower Sindh, Gujrat in Central Punjab and Bhawalpur in Southern Punjab
had 100% respondents saying they were aware of it. KP province at 34.6% again
lagged far behind other clusters. Awareness was also found to be higher among women
leaders with higher levels of education than the less educated ones and those who were
also members of the CAC in their district compared to non-CAC women leaders.
Evaluation findings lead us to conclude that the projects wider impact on governance
and public policy could increase significantly if advocacy at the grassroots level had
specific objectives articulated as desired changes in systems and practices, and if
community demands and salient legal and policy issues related to womens rights were
taken up as advocacy and lobbying agendas at provincial and federal levels. Half way
through the project duration, there appears to be a disconnect between the
implementing partners lobbying agenda and knowledge and perceptions within women
leaders. For example, in the sample survey, majority of respondents (75.6%) agreed
with the statement that Pakistan had laws that discriminated against women. However,
a notable 13.6% disagreed and close to11% said they did not know. The percentage
of those saying they agreed ranged from an impressive 93.5% in Upper Punjab to just
55.6% in KP Province.
In terms of corrective measures and with a view to scaling up impact, the evaluation
report sets out a case for bringing greater clarity on project goals and objectives and
the links with activities. There is room for improvement in projects monitoring
framework and a greater focus on qualitative results as against quantitative targets. It
is suggested that WLGs are revitalized by replacing inactive members and variations in
performance across region are taken into account as part of future planning. The report
also calls for the development of a sustainability plan. Such a plan could include certain
low-cost but critical inputs, for example, linking the WLGs up with a legal aid centre
would not only meet a very strong demand by women but also add to the groups
prestige and value. The sustainability plan, we suggest, would need to shift the focus
toward demand generation rather than logistical facilitation provided by WLGs and CACs
to communities.
The report, we hope, provides some useful insights into qualitative dimensions of
project implementation. Evaluation findings are expected to serve as a springboard of
ideas for better management and monitoring, timely corrective measures and scaling
up positive results.
iv
State of Human Rights in 2009. Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP), p 186.
1.3
On official accounts, project activities commenced in early 2009, the initial six months
or so taken up by a baseline study and identification of women leaders and formation of
WLGs. As we elaborate under evaluation findings, the way women leaders were
identified and recruited had implications for all activities to follow. Suffice it to mention
that bringing volunteers and supporters onboard cannot be seen as an addendum to
main activities. The impression that the process of group formation has fallen through
official monitoring cracks emanates from the absence of relevant indicators in the LFA
and inadequate discussion of its qualitative aspects in progress reports. Regrettably,
the RHV baseline was conducted in only five of the 30 target districts and the selection
of the sampled districts was never explained. The project LFA, the main monitoring
tool, has drawn (mostly) quantitative indicators from the baseline, some of which are
not measurable. Furthermore, it does not establish a proper logical hierarchy between
activities and results.
Terms of reference, Mid Term Review and Final Evaluation, GTF158 Raising Her Voice, p 1.
Ibid
4
CACs were set up in 1997 and had donor support up until 2005, which provided them a fixed monthly operational
allowance. Activities included awareness-raising and advocacy on violence against women, womens economic
empowerment and political participation. The 30 RHV districts are among the total 69 where CACs exist despite
the discontinuation of the donor support.
3
Project reporting and documentation appears up-to-date and fairly exhaustive in terms
of covering progress against quantitative targets and some best practices. However, it
is weak on analyzing and communicating qualitative results. This may have to do with
the fact that the project does not have a full-time M&E person on-board. Most activities
are documented by CAC and WLG volunteers, who on their own admission, have limited
capacity and time for this kind of work.
Desk Review: Following initial meetings with OGB and the implementing partner,
AF, the consultant reviewed key project documents such as the project proposal
submitted by AF, annual work plans, progress reports and the baseline study.
Selected academic literature on womens rights and devolution and relevant laws
and policies were also reviewed. Methodology for primary data collection was
finalized in consultation with both AF and OGB.
Telephonic Sample Survey with Women Activists: To assess the status of women
leader groups (WLGs), the level of members participation in project activities,
and their knowledge and perceptions with relation to key project themes, a
sample survey was deemed necessary. Given potential logistical problems in
administering questionnaires face-to-face, it was decided that the survey would
be conducted telephonically.
The sampling was done using simple random method in conjunction with
stratification for major occupational groups represented in the women leaders
groups. Taking 1500 women leaders as population and using a confidence level
of 95% and confidence interval of +-5, minimum sample size of slightly over 300
was obtained. The sample size was rounded up to 360 to have 12 women leaders
from each of the thirty target districts to make the sample more representative.
Stratification was done at the district level, ensuring the representation of former
elected representatives, NGO employees and social workers, and other
professional categories proportionate to their numbers in each district.
Interviewees were then picked up randomly. Unfortunately, the sampling frame
and the final lists turned out to be fairly problematic as at least 30% women
either did not have a phone number, or had a wrong number against their name.
However, 253 interviews with done using a structured, mostly close-ended
questionnaire (See Annex 2). The present report draws on data from all but
three districts, where hardly a couple of respondents could be contacted. In
addition to discussing the overall state of WLGs, the report also compares and
contrasts survey results by geographical clusters, which for the purposes of the
mid-term review are:
Balochistan: Jafarabad, Naseerabad and Sibi
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: Abbotabad, Haripur and Nowshera
Upper Punjab: Attock, Jehlum, Chakwal and Rawalpindi
Central Punjab: Gujranwala, Gujrat, Hafizabad and Sialkot
Southern Punjab: Bhakkar, Bhawalpur, Dera Ghazi Khan (D.G Khan),
Mianwali, Layyah, Multan and Rahim Yar Khan
Central-Central-Upper Sindh: Dadu, Sukkur, Ghotki, Jaccobabad and
Shikarpur
Lower Sindh: Hyderabad, Thatta, Tando Allah Yar and Shaheed
Benazirabad (formerly Nawabshah)
Focus Group Discussions with WLG and CAC Office Bearers: Brining together
general secretaries of WLGs and Coordinators of CACs from all 30 project
districts, seven focus group discussions were held at a central location in seven
clusters listed above. The FGDs provided useful contextual information, insights
into process followed, key achievements and challenges. Data collected has been
most useful in assessing the impact, relevance, effectiveness, replicability and
sustainability as well as putting survey findings into perspective. FGD agenda is
attached as Annex 3.
intellectual rigour, it becomes hard to measure impact and broad changes resulting
from the project.
Participants in focus groups, which comprised of CACs and WLGs office bearers from all
target districts, understood the project as essentially aimed at increasing womens
political participation and the role in decision making. Enhancing womens leadership
roles and capacity for leadership also got mentioned a few times. All these relate to
project objectives 1 through 3. The participants did not seem aware of the project goal
specifically or the 4th objective dealing with developing media and communication
strategies for advocacy. Focus group discussions revealed that many WLG and CAC
representatives perceive civil registration as an objective whereas on project design it
comes across more as a means to an end, which is presumably enhancing womens role
in decision making and leadership positions. However, this is not discrediting some
excellent work done in most districts by way of civil registration. As we discuss shortly,
formation of national identity cards in significant numbers can be seen as one major
achievement to date. In fact, the reason tangible progress has been achieved on this
account may well have to do with the fact that WLG and CAC representatives consider it
to be a project objective in itself. By contrast, no advocacy or media strategy is in
place, which could at least partially be attributed to a lack of appreciation of the
corresponding objective (See objective 4, Box 1 above).
Within the definitional limitations mentioned earlier, the present section attempts to
shed light on signs of early impact, focusing in particular on: changes in womens role
in governance, reforms in laws, policies and institutional practices, and broad social and
political consequences that can be attributed to the project. Potentially far-reaching
results under the project objectives where evident are also discussed inasmuch as they
are likely to contribute to the project goal in coming years.
sure. The percentage of those saying they intended to run for office was particularly
low among the youngest age cohort of women leaders i.e. 18-24 years (See Graph 1).
Positively, a majority of ex-councilors (76%) said they did intend to run for office.
However, it is significant to note that a noticeable 15.2% among them said no and
another 8.7% said they could not say. Thus, in the run-up to the next local body
elections, the project has an opportunity to work toward effecting an impact on
womens role in accountability and governance but that would require work not only in
preparing these women to step back into the local political arena but also to strengthen
their capacities, which we discuss separately in this chapter.
Graph 1: Intention to Run for Public Office among Women Leaders (Sample Survey)
Graph 1:Do you intend to run for
public office in future? (Sample
Survey)
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
18 to 24
Yes
35 to 39
40 to 44
No
55 and
Above
Cannot say
Table 1: Intention to Run for Public Office across Clusters (Sample Survey)
Do you intend to run for public office?
Cluster
Yes
CENTRAL PUNJAB
KHYBER PAKHTUN
KHWA
LOWER SINDH
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
UPPER PUNJAB
CENTRAL-UPPER
SINDH
Total
No
Cannot say
Total
42.9%
37.1%
20.0%
100%
46.2%
38.5%
15.4%
100%
62.5%
37.5%
43.7%
43.7%
12.7%
100%
30.4%
52.2%
17.4%
100%
47.4%
52.6%
44.4%
44.4%
100%
100%
11.3%
100%
While the system of elected representative at the local level might be in limbo
constraining womens role in accountability and governance, it has to be noted that the
country has democratic government in place at provincial and federal level. Two
important accountability mechanisms available at those levels are the parliamentary
committee system and the right to freedom of information, which is now a substantive
part of the Constitution of Pakistan5. There is no evidence of the project having
5
th
Article 19A, Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as amended by the 18 Amendment.
Public
Opinion
Legal Bodies
Ombudsmen
Courts
Executive
Media
Organisied
Publics
Public Saftey
Commissions
Electorate
With regard to RHVs role in terms of utilizing these spaces for strengthening womens
role in accountability, one arena where an indirect difference has been made is that of
the electorate, as a sizable number of women have been registered as voters. If these
do exercise the right to vote to hold the incumbent representatives accountable, this
could be an indication of RHV having made an impact come next general elections.
One outcome of RHV, which can pave the way for a stronger role by women in
accountability and governance, is that it has brought together women from different
political parties together on one platform. Mutual trust and cordiality was evident in
most FGDs held as part of the evaluation. They have already worked together resolving
some issues at the local level. On many womens rights issues, they think alike despite
difference in ideological leanings. Whether this minimum consensus on womens rights
can be scaled up will require advocacy efforts with political leadership at provincial and
national leadership.
FGDs across seven clusters revealed that WLG and CAC representatives do not have
specific lobbying agendas to effect a change in laws and policies at the provincial and
federal level, lobbying being defined as a subset of advocacy that aims at influencing
laws and public policy. This is worrisome given the fact that Pakistan still has a number
of discriminatory provisions and laws on the statute books. These include provisions
related to womens evidence and reproductive rights in the Pakistan Penal Code, the
law of inheritance and the law dealing with minimum age at marriage, to mention a
few. The signs of the project making a broad impact on laws with regard to womens
rights remain weak in the absence of lobbying agendas or plans. This weakness is
accentuated when seen in the context of the survey findings regarding the awareness of
discriminatory laws among women leaders.
While majority of respondents (75.6%) agreed with the statement that Pakistan had
laws that discriminated against women, a notable 13.6% disagreed and close to11%
said they did not know. The percentage of those saying they agreed ranged from an
impressive 93.5% in Upper Punjab to just 55.6% in KP Province.
10
Table 2: Perception about the Existence of Discriminatory Laws among Women Leaders by
Clusters (Sample Survey)
Do you think there are laws in Pakistan
that discrimination against women?
Cluster
Yes
CENTRAL PUNJAB
KHYBER PAKHTUN
KHWA
LOWER SINDH
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
UPPER PUNJAB
CENTRAL-UPPER
SINDH
Total
No
Do not know
Total
71.4%
22.9%
5.7%
100%
55.6%
29.6%
14.8%
100%
62.5%
9.4%
28.1%
100%
85.9%
7.0%
7.0%
100%
93.5%
6.5%
64.1%
17.9%
17.9%
100%
75.6%
13.6%
10.8%
100%
100%
Of those who said laws did discriminate against women, only 25% could correctly name
a discriminatory law. 15% gave wrong answers and majority (60%) said they could not
recall the name. Southern Punjab had the highest percentage i.e. 58% followed by
Central Punjab 28% and Lower Sindh 24% who correctly named a discriminatory law.
Of those who said laws did discriminate against women, housewives, government
servant and government school teachers had very high percentages of those giving a
wrong answer compared to other occupational categories.
When asked if they thought all discriminatory laws should be repealed, majority (87%)
of those who knew about the existence of discriminatory laws agreed. Southern Punjab
at 93% had the highest percentage of respondents agreeing with the statement and KP
the lowest at 63%. Within Punjab, Central Punjab at 80% lagged behind others in
endorsing the need for repealing discriminatory laws. These statistics point to the need
for some nuanced ground work to be done in terms of increasing awareness about
discriminatory laws and universalizing the demand for the repeal or reforms if the
project is to make an impact on the legal environment during the remaining course of
the project.
11
form of increased awareness of the issue of sexual harassment but most WLG and CAC
representatives quoted that as a major achievement. The very fact that government
officials have agreed to put up notices and other informational material (provided by AF
and partners) in their offices is a sign of some headway being made, said a participant
in the Upper Punjab FGD. WLG General Secretary from Abbotabad, KP cluster, said
women from remote areas were beginning to approach the group to discuss cases of
harassment, knowing that a relevant law was in place now. From District Haripur in the
same cluster, the CAC coordinator told the story of a woman college teacher who had
been harassed by a senior colleague. We took up the case with the inquiry committee
constituted under the Harassment Bill in that college and the accused was removed
from the post. In District Sialkot, Central Punjab, the WLG organised a seminar at the
District Bar Association, which was quoted as an achievement because it was for the
first time that ordinary women were able to make inroads into a highly influential civil
society forum. In district Layyah in Southern Punjab, WLG and CAC actually managed
to get the District Bar Association to form an inquiry committee as envisaged under the
law. In district Sibi, Balochistan, the CAC had reportedly got assurance from the
District Coordination Officer (DCO) with regard to the implementation of the Bill and as
a first step he had fixed a day to hear womens complaints.
An initial sign of impact with regard to the implementation of the Protection against
Harassment Bill is the fact that around 73% women leaders said they knew of the law.
District Hyderabad in lower Sindh, Gujrat in Central Punjab and Bhawalpur in Southern
Punjab had 100% respondents saying they were aware of it. KP province at 34.6%
again lagged far behind other clusters. Awareness was also found to be higher among
women leaders with higher levels of education than the less educated ones and those
who were also members of the CAC in their district compared to non-CAC women
leaders.
In what might be indicative of the confidence of women leaders in their groups ability
to make a change, Upper Punjab and Central Punjab had relatively higher percentages
of those saying they were optimistic to a great extent that the law could be
implemented in their district. The fact that overall just over 19% respondents were
optimistic to a great extent about the possibility of the law being fully implemented
indicates the need for translating awareness into positive action and ultimately a
change in institutional practices.
Cluster
CENTRAL PUNJAB
To a great
extent
To some
extent
33.3%
54.2%
8.3%
77.8%
22.2%
KHYBER PAKHTUN
KHWA
Not at all
Cannot say
4.2%
Total
100%
100%
LOWER SINDH
16.7%
61.1%
16.7%
5.6%
100%
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
10.7%
73.2%
12.5%
3.6%
100%
12
Total
UPPER PUNJAB
37.8%
35.1%
24.3%
2.7%
100%
CENTRAL-UPPER
SINDH
7.7%
42.3%
3.8%
46.2%
100%
19.4%
56.5%
14.1%
10.0%
100%
In other areas, as part of civil registration campaigns, there has been some impact on
the responsiveness of the National Data Registration Authority (NADRA). Friday has
been designated as an exclusive day for woman to visit the static centres for getting
National Identity Cards (NICs) made or replaced. Districts where FGD participants made
this claim were Layyah in Southern Punjab, Gujranawala in Central Punjab, Jafarabad in
Balochistan and Sukkur in Central-Upper Sindh. A government official interviewed in
Sukkur, however, maintained it was the governments own initiative being implemented
across the country. Regardless of whether it was the direct result of WLG and CAC
campaigning, the decision has immensely helped a large number of women in obtaining
the ID cards. In District Chakwal, a member of the WLG group volunteered with NADRA
to help them with womens registration. Impressed with her work, the department
eventually hired her as an employee. A NADRA official from the remote Rahim Yar Khan
District of Southern Punjab said interaction with AF and partners has allowed me to
look at womens issues from a fresh perspective. In several districts, women leaders
have gained access to NADRAs official set up-static and mobile units-by helping them
out with registering women, especially where the department does not have adequate
female staff.
In Punjab province, some districts have been successful in getting women represented
on Zakat Committees at the union council level, which could lead to transparency in
disbursement of cash to the needy women. In District Hafizabad, Central Punjab, WLG
members went as far as approaching the district court when they heard about
irregularities and exclusion of women in the appointment of committee members. The
court ruled in favour of the group staying the functioning of the committee. The district
now has 15 Zakat Committees headed by women. Similarly, in District Chakwal, the
WLG succeeded in getting two positions created for women in Darul Aman, a
government shelter house for women victims of violence and abuse.
13
14
Such examples, remarkable as they are, cannot be taken as a sign of all WLG members
having transformed into confident activists. As we discuss later on in the report, active
participation in the project and WLG activities has remained confined to a limited
number of members. Most WLG and CAC office-bearers in FGDs were candid enough to
admit it themselves.
Since the project objective (objective 2) dealing with knowledge and capacities
specifically mentioned the ability to influence decision-making vis--vis womens
economic and political rights, WLG representatives were asked a few questions as proxy
indicators of their relevant knowledge. Some 37.3% respondents had not heard of the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW),
with noticeable variations across clusters and a few other variables. District Hyderabad
in Lower Sindh and District Gujranwala in Central Punjab had 100% respondents saying
they had heard of CEDAW. Bhawalpur at 91% and D.G Khan at around 88% also had
large percentages within their districts of those saying they had heard of CEDAW.
Within age groups, those in mid to late 30s (35-39) and early 40s had higher
percentages of respondents saying they had heard of the convention compared to other
age cohorts. It might be a source of concern that among the youngest age cohort only
half the respondents said they had heard of CEDAW. Across age cohorts, survey
findings reveal a greater involvement and relevant knowledge among women leaders in
late 30s to early 40s compared to younger and older age groups.
Graph 2: Awareness of CEDAW among Women Leaders across Clusters (Sample Survey)
Have you heard of CEDAW?
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Central
Punjab
Khber
Pakhtun
Khwa
Yes
Lower
Sindh
Southern
Punjab
Upper
Punjab
Upper
Sindh
No
15
Table 4: Awareness of CEDAW among Women Leaders by Age Groups (Sample Survey)
Have you heard about
CEDAW?
Age Categories
Total
Yes
No
18 to 24
50.0%
50.0%
Total
100%
25 to 29
58.8%
41.2%
100%
30 to 34
56.5%
43.5%
100%
35 to 39
72.2%
27.8%
100%
40 to 44
70.7%
29.3%
100%
45 to 49
56.8%
43.2%
100%
50 to 54
63.6%
36.4%
100%
55 and
Above
71.4%
28.6%
100%
62.6%
37.4%
100%
Interestingly, there was a greater percentage among ex-councilors (70%) of those who
said they had heard of the convention compared to those WLG members who had never
been a councilor (59%)6. Also WLG members who also had the membership of the CAC
in their district had a significantly higher percentage (73%) of respondents saying they
had heard of the convention compared to non-CAC women (52%)7. The awareness of
the convention was also found to be positively linked with the members educational
level. Within ex-councilors, those who had been elected at district level had a higher
percentage (46%) compared to corresponding figures for those who had been
councilors at tehsil (22%) and union council level (33%).
Asked how familiar they were with the Fundamental Rights in the Constitution of
Pakistan, only 17.8% women leaders said to a great extent. Districts Hyderabad in
Sindh at 71.4% and Gujranwala at 50%had comparatively larger percentages of
respondents saying they were familiar with these rights to a great extent. Across
clusters, yet again, KP has the smallest percentage and Central Punjab the highest
followed by lower Sindh and Southern Punjab.
Among ex-councilors, those who had been elected at the district level had a higher percentage of women saying
they had heard of CEDAW compared to tehsil and union council elected representatives.
7
The fact that CAC members may be more aware of legal and womens rights issues can also be
gauged from the fact that they had larger percentage 88.4 percent of respondents saying they
thought the legal age at marriage for girls should be no less than 18 years compared to nonmembers.
16
Graph 3: Familiarity with Fundamental Rights among Women Leaders (Sample Survey)
How familar would you say you are
with the Fundamental Rights given in
Constitution of Pakistan?
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
To a great
extent
To some
extent
Not at all
Cannot say
The youngest age quintile had the highest percentage of those saying they were not
familiar with fundamental rights at all. Those in early 40s had a greater proportion of
respondents saying they were familiar with fundamental rights to a great extent
compared to other age groups.
2.2 Relevance
The project was reasonably relevant to both supply and demand side of governance at
the time of the inception in that it sought to give a collective platform to women in
communities and targeted women elected representatives in local bodies as WLG
members and participants in capacity building initiatives. The discontinuation of the
local government system has severely restricted the projects ability to improve
womens role in accountability at the local level since many spaces for engaging with
elected representatives at the local level are not available. In many instances, excouncilors who are a part of WLGs, have become disgruntled and dormant. This view
was shared by FGD participants in most clusters. However, some disagreed, saying the
RHV had actually provided a platform to erstwhile elected representatives after the
dissolution of local bodies. AF staff members are of the view that objective 2, which
expressly sought to increase elected representatives capacity to influence decisionmaking in local councils is no longer relevant8.
The idea of having women come together on a common platform for collective action
was, according to most WLG and CAC representatives, relevant to local needs for
demand articulation and citizens oversight of the government. To quote CAC
Coordinator from district Gujrat, Prior to RHV we would often discuss the need for
raising womens voice as they make up 50% of the population and have little say in
public decision-making.
The federal government has repeatedly claimed that it is committed to holding local government elections but no
date has been given yet.
17
Involving men in the project through CACs was also a sensible idea within the cultural
contexts where women have limited mobility. Sizable sections of population in some
project districts still do not approve of their presence in the public domain. Women-only
projects, especially those dealing with legal and political rights, are sometimes
perceived as a threat to religious and tribal values and fail to make much headway in
rural areas. Involvement of CACs also had the added advantage of capitalizing on the
work that had already been done by the implementing partner.
Projects emphasis on engaging with relevant government departments and getting
existing laws implemented, for example, Protection against Harassment at Workplace
Bill, also addresses the need for constructive activism that seeks to effect changes
through available procedures rather than taking confrontational positions. The supply
side of governance, however, would have been addressed better had the project also
sought to build the capacity of local bureaucracies for addressing womens rights.
Some contextual realities that could have been taken into account while designing the
project and planning activities out relate to the energy crisis in Pakistan, climate change
and extreme events. There is no evidence of OGB having made any efforts to
complement RHV through its Disaster Preparedness and Climate Change Programme.
WLGs and CACs have, on their own initiative, provided rescue and relief services
voluntarily in the aftermath of the 2010 floods. They could have been helped a lot in
their efforts if some linkages had been there with OGB partners which have capacity
and experience in disaster management.
2.3 Equity
In project areas with diverse ethnic population, the project has been fairly successful in
involving different ethnic groups. For example, Central-Upper Sindh, a region where
majority is Sindhi speaking, has significant percentages of minority ethnic groups
among WLG members. These include 20.5% Urdu-speakers, 12.8% Seraiki speakers,
and 10.3 Punjabi-speakers. Lower Sindh again has representation of all ethnic groups in
the region, including around 23 percent Urdu-speakers, are percentage, which is more
or less proportionate to their actual numbers in the overall population. Hyderabad, the
largest district in the cluster, has a Sindhi speaking woman as CAC Coordinator and an
Urdu-speaker as WLG general secretary-an arrangement which they both agree has
helped bridge ethnic divide among local activists. The pattern is remarkable all the
more as CAC and WLG representatives in the FGDs strongly endorsed the need for
including all ethnic groups as a means to undercut vested political interests based on
language and ethnic affiliations.
18
Cluster
Mother Tongue
Balochi
CENTRAL
PUNJAB
Punjabi
70.4%
UPPER
PUNJAB
CENTRALUPPER SINDH
Total
.8%
4.3%
8.4%
.4%
74.3%
18.8%
21.1%
80.4%
10.3%
35.2%
29.6%
3.2%
Seraiki
6.3%
Sindhi
59.4%
Urdu
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
2.9%
Pushto
Total
LOWER
SINDH
5.1%
Hindko
Lasi
KHYBER
PAKHTUN
KHWA
22.9%
100%
100%
60.6%
12.8%
20.0%
51.3%
15.6%
15.6%
18.3%
15.2%
20.5%
16.4%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
The situation, by contrast, is not all that promising when it comes to religious
minorities. Only 1% respondents in the sample survey stated their religion as other
than Islam. Sindh, which has the largest proportion of minority population among all
four provinces, has no non-Muslim respondent. FGDs revealed that this is unlikely to be
a result of any sampling error as minority members in WLGs are few and far between.
At the time of the group formation, the implementing partner, gave some guidelines
with regard to occupational categories. However, no mention was made of the need for
including religious minorities in the WLGs. Other excluded groups include Afghan
refugees in the KP province and women with physical disabilities in all clusters.
Admittedly, this does not seem to be a result of any bias on the part of AF or WLG and
CAC office-bearers. However, by not making conscious efforts to include these groups
as WLG members, the project has fallen short of addressing the project goal, which
expressly mentions marginalized women. Project activities are not geared toward
addressing the needs of religious minorities, refugees and those with mental and
physical disabilities.
The way project is designed, a lot of networking, advocacy and campaign work, goes on
at district headquarters as a result of which women from far-flung areas are not able to
participate actively; there are no provisions for reimbursing their travel expenses in
connection with such activities. In some districts, such as Dadu and Thatta in Sindh and
Jafarabad in Balochistan, there were some union councils, which did not have any
representation from far-flung union councils to begin with. In most others, members
were enlisted from all parts of the district. However, their participation has remained
weak compared to the members residing in or around district headquarters.
2.4 Effectiveness
As discussed under the section on impact, the project has had no impact on law and
public policy at provincial and federal levels. This appears to be linked with a lack of
vertical linkages that could have allowed aggregation of community and activists
demands at the grassroots level. The AF staffs role is limited to management,
monitoring and some input in capacity building at the district level. The project
19
approach and activities do not seem to be utilizing channels for accountability and
oversight at the higher levels of governance, such as parliamentary committees and the
freedom of information provisions protected under federal and provincial laws.
At the district level, much creditable work has been done by way of influencing
administrative and institutional practices in some departments. However, the emphasis
seems to be more on undertaking activities and meeting targets set by the AF rather
than achieving specific advocacy objectives through proper planning. The projects
wider impact on governance and public policy could increase significantly if advocacy at
the grassroots level had specific objectives articulated as desired changes in systems
and practices, and if community demands and salient legal and policy issues related to
womens rights were taken up as advocacy and lobbying agendas at provincial and
federal levels. The project does not seem to be based on a nuanced understanding of
advocacy and lobbying as inter-related but separate components of social mobilization.
To impact policies, systems and institutional practices, it is also helpful to view
awareness raising/community mobilization, advocacy and lobbying on a continuum. The
repeal of discriminatory laws against women-a lobbying agenda-could be helped if it
was backed by adequate awareness of such laws and demand for repeal among
communities (community mobilization) and approval of that demand by opinion-makers
and political leadership (advocacy).
An example of the disconnect between local womens perceptions and the implementing
partners lobbying agenda is that just 29% of respondents in the sample survey said
they would like next local body election to be held on political party basis. Majority
(65.3%) said the elections should be held on non-party basis. This contrasts with the
official AF position that the elections should be held on party-basis. The discrepancy is
more acute in the light of the fact that in many districts WLG and CAC members have
actually participated in AF rallies calling for the restoration of the local bodies.
On the positive side, the projects strategy to include female CAC members in WLGs
and involving male CAC members has proved to be advantageous. Sample survey
reveals that CAC members are ahead of others in terms of knowledge about certain
rights issues as well as participation in RHV activities9. Male involvement has facilitated
access to government officials and has been instrumental in organizing events at the
district level level. However, one drawback is that CAC coordinators and members have
previously been involved in a funded project with AF. They have expectations about
monetary and logistical support influenced by their past experience.
Within WLGs, the strategy of having a mixed group comprising members from different
occupations has also supported project objectives. For example, government employees
as members of women groups have reportedly helped resolve womens issues and
catalyzed some administrative changes in local government departments. However, a
number of important issues were not effectively addressed and strategized during the
inception phase. The formation of WLGs was not informed by a thorough understanding
of marginalization, resulting in the inadvertent exclusion of religious minorities and the
9
KP and Central Punjab cluster which seem to be lagging behind other clusters in terms of
participations and members awareness of key rights issues have the lowest percentages of women
leaders who also have CAC membership. Overall, some 49% respondents said they were CAC
members. Percentages for Central Punjab and KP are 31.4% and 34.6% respectively.
20
disabled. Similarly, no adequate planning was done to ensure continued and sustained
participation of all and not just a few active members, residing in urban areas.
Project goal and objectives were not clearly communicated to partners at the grassroots
level. As a result, there is a tendency to equate and conflate awareness-raising and
advocacy activities as objectives rather than means to a broader end.
2.5 Efficiency
Project results that are already evident, such as, civil registration in large numbers,
partial implementation of the Protection against Harassment at Workplace Bill, inclusion
of women in union council Zakat committees, resolution of domestic issues and help
provided to victims of violence, have been helped by voluntary contribution of time and
resources by women leaders and CAC members. On project budget, CAC and WLGs
receive reimbursements for planned activities, including issue sensitization and
awareness raising meetings, civil registration and advocacy campaigns, and special
activities. There was a consensus among CAC coordinators and WLG representatives in
every district that the amount was not adequate to cover the expenses. Lack of
participation by all WLG members in meetings and advocacy events and campaigns was
also linked with the fact that there is no provision for travel allowance for them to
participate in these activities.
Asked if they knew about the kind of budget that would be available right from the
beginning, many participants replied in affirmative, but added that they were given an
assurance that the amounts would be revised upwards under some heads. This is what
actually happened when the budget for civil registration campaigns was increased by
25%. Some FGD participants also said they agreed to be a part of the project despite
low activity budget because it was better than doing nothing. RHV implementation
thus seems to have an inbuilt tension between voluntary activism and paid activities.
The available budget for the latter under RHV is often compared with what other NGOs
pay, leading to resentment among some office-bearers. While it might be easier to
state that the project has been cost effective inasmuch as activities are being
undertaken on a shoestring budget, that would amount to oversimplifying complex
realities.
Operational costs (13%) and personnel costs (39%) together make up 53% of the total
budget. While the amounts under these heads are fairly reasonable given the existing
inflation rates and in line with salaries offered by national NGOs, this leaves fairly little
for activities on the ground. The issue is problematic all the more because the project
seems to be understaffed. Conducting advocacy and lobbying at provincial levels,
providing additional technical support to WLGs and CACs, and improving monitoring and
reporting, all call for additional programme staff.
In terms of returns on investments, civil registration campaigns and improvements in
working environment for women as a result of implementation of the Harassment Bill,
can be expected to pay significant social dividends by opening up new opportunities for
women in social and political spheres. Other types of work, such as capacity building,
do not appear to be cost-effective for the following reasons: Not all WLG members have
had a chance to participate in trainings and there is no plan in place to replicate the
trainings through master trainers; no refresher courses or follow-up have been included
in capacity building activities; and no training manuals or participants workbooks have
been prepared, which could have institutionalized training modules to some extent.
21
36%
64%
Yes
No
On the part of OGB, there has been a lack of planning on creating linkages with the We
Can Campaign. In some districts WLG and CAC office-bearers
office bearers are of the view that
activities are being duplicated. In the light of the fact that RHV does not have provisions
for offices at district level-something
something cited as a maj
major
or constraint by all FGD participantsparticipants
OGB could have planned to share offices
office between We Can and RHV partners where
feasible.
2.6 Sustainability::
The issue of sustainability is intimately connected with the preceding discussion on
impact, relevance, equity, effectiveness and efficiency. For instance, an enabling legal
and policy environment at provincial and federal level would help sustain positive
institutional
ional changes that come about at local level. To give a concrete example, it
might not be enough for project to demonstrate that partners have established good
rapport with local police administration and thereby facilitated protection to victims of
violence and abuse. The results might not last if the supportive officials get transferred
transferredwhich happens all the time. To sustain the changes, more systematic advocacy will be
required with provincial police departments so that changes are institutionalized.
Similarly, focusing on social themes relevant to contemporary Pakistan (for example,
disaster management, alternative energy, peace and tolerance) could open up new
venues of funding for local NGOs and CBOs, which have representation on WLGs and
CACs.
In the FGDs, opinion was divided on whether the WLGs and the kind of activities and
campaigns they are undertaking will last beyond the project duration. Citing CACs as an
example, some participants said, we continued working even after the official funding
came to an end. CAC Coordinator from Multan was of the view that local people have
to continue working for their own benefit regardless of whether funding continues or
not. Another opinion was that local volunteers could not just abandon the work
wo
initiated under RHV if funding dried up because that would
would put our reputation at
22
stake. People, especially women, now have hopes and expectations in us so we have
to sustain our work to the extent possible.
However, not all participants were as sanguine. Some said the kind of activities that
were being carried out under RHV, civil registration, for example, require money. To
quote one participant, What we are getting now does not amount to much but it at
least covers our bare minimum operational expenses. Some were of the view that WLG
and CAC members would continue to undertake voluntary work but not in a planned or
systematic manner.
Asked to give recommendations for making projects results sustainable, FGD
participants suggested a wider coverage of training programme so that members have
the capacity to initiate voluntary programmes. Representatives from a number of
districts were of the opinion that provision for a common meeting place or an office for
WLGs and CACs would enable a stronger sense of identity and professionalism.
Realistically speaking, it would be naive to expect WLGs and CACs to mature into selfsustaining bodies without putting in place an elaborate sustainability plan. Such a plan
needs to identify strategic alliances both vertically and horizontally i.e. between
volunteers, AF and partners at provincial and national levels as well as with potential
allies, such as District and Teshil Bar Associations at grassroots levels. Some low-cost
but critical inputs, such as linking the WLGs up with a legal aid centre would not only
meet a very strong demand by women but also add to the groups prestige and value.
With regard to other areas, such as civil registration and advocacy for implementation
of laws, the sustainability plan would need to shift the focus toward demand generation
rather than open-ended interventions and facilitation provided by WLGs and CACs to
communities.
2.7 Replicability
The projects approach of including men in campaigning and advocating for womens
rights has proved useful for fellow women activists in navigating gender insensitive and
chauvinistic terrain of government departments and rural politics. The approach can be
replicated in sector-specific projects for demand articulation, such as those in education
and environment. Bringing women from different occupational backgrounds also allows
activists entry points for engaging with a range of actors, such as media, government
and the legal community. There is no reason why such modes of association cannot be
adopted in projects dealing with other issues. Similarly, the project has shown that it is
possible to get women politicians from across the political divide to have a common
stance on certain issues. Similar efforts at provincial and national levels could help with
advocacy and lobbying activities.
In terms of engagement with laws and public policy, it appears that the project has
reaped rewards where the focus has been on getting existing instruments implemented.
For example, some progress is evident in district government departments adopting
code of conduct with regard to sexual harassment as stipulated in the Protection
against Harassment Bill. While lobbying for new laws might be necessary, oftentimes it
might be more realistic to make the best use of laws and policies that are already in
place and which the governments cannot back off from that easily.
23
3.
24
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Yes
No
Across age categories, the youngest quintile has the highest percentage i.e. 36% who
have not participated in an AF meeting during the past 2 years compared with just
5.6% in the age group 35-39 years. Across occupational categories, lady health visitors
and lady health workers, housewives, home-based workers and government categories
had higher percentages, ranging from 30% to 43% who had not heard of the CAC in
their district. There was a higher percentage among ex-councilors (78.3%) who said
they were aware of CACs compared to the corresponding figure of 68.6% for those who
had never been a councilor.
In terms of quantitative targets, ISMs and awareness raising meetings (ARMs) have
been held for all 30 districts during 2009 and 2010. In qualitative terms, it has to be
pointed out that REFLECT approach, the methodology proposed in the original proposal,
was never used. Advocacy and campaign plans coming out of these meetings reflect
participants awareness of a range of social issues from poverty and unemployment to
education and legal aid. However, many of these plans appear to be talking about
service delivery and have very broad and unrealistic goals.
The RHV newsletter, which is listed under networking activities in the project work plan,
was seen by only 40% women leaders, with lowest figures for KP, Lower Sindh and
Central Punjab in the same order. There were fewer among the youngest age group
who said they had seen the newsletter compared to those in late 30s and early 40s.
Across occupational categories, Lady Health Workers (LHWs), housewives, homebased-workers and government school teachers had particularly low percentages of
those who said they had seen the newsletter.
25
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Central
Punjab
Khber
Pakhtun
Khwa
Lower
Sindh
Yes
Southern
Punjab
Upper
Punjab
Upper
Sindh
No
Positively, however, among those who had seen the newsletter, 59% respondents said
they found it very informative and another 34% said they found it informative. In
FGDs, most participants recommended that the frequency of publication be increased to
quarterly from the current biannually. In Lower Sindh, participants suggested that the
newsletter be published in Sindhi or bilingually to reach out to women in rural areas.
26
CENTRAL
PUNJAB
KHYBER
PAKHTUN KHWA
LOWER SINDH
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
UPPER PUNJAB
No
Not Sure
100%
Total
100%
96.2%
3.8%
100%
87.5%
6.3%
6.3%
100%
92.8%
4.3%
2.9%
100%
Despite much
progress, civil
CENTRAL97.4%
2.6%
100% registration
UPPER SINDH
Total
93.1%
4.5%
2.4%
100% campaigns
have had their
share of problems. WLG and CAC office-bearers spoke of issues, such as NADRA
officials refusing to send mobile vans to far-off places or asking for fuel and other
arrangements. A participant in the Upper Punjab FGD said, For the first campaign,
NADRA provided us a van, a driver and staff for a mobile unit. All other arrangements
including food, gathering people for registration, electricity generator for the van were
all our responsibility.
86.7%
11.1%
2.2%
100%
At places, WLG and CAC workers coordinating mobile campaigns for civil registration
have ended up disquieting the officials because we could not gather the required
number of people for registration once the van got there. Local politicians manipulating
NADRAs resources to facilitate their own constituents at the expense of more deserving
ones. In some districts, for example, district Shaheed Benazirabad, NADRA officials
have not been all that forthcoming because CACs and WLGs are not well-known and
registered entities like NGOs. Regrettably, these district-specific problems are not
adequately addressed in regular RHV reporting.
Advocacy with other departments has borne limited results through collective pressure
building. These have included planned activities, such as those related to Protection
against Harassment Bill 2010, and many unplanned and totally voluntary initiatives,
such as rallies and protests against irregularities in issuance of Watan Cards to flood
victims and local development schemes. In qualitative terms, what seems missing is
proper advocacy planning with objectives, tools, channels, target audiences and allies
defined.
Two-day workshops on leadership held under cluster 2 received good feedback.
However, there is a strong demand among women leaders that the training be followed
by a refresher course. While available resources might not allow that, the very fact that
activists are keen to learn bodes well for future capacity building work. In this context,
working out ways of cost-effective means, such as replication by master trainers at
community level, would be worthwhile. AF did not produce any training manual as part
of the leadership workshop, which makes replication difficult. Participants feedback
forms collected at the end of the workshops provide useful qualitative data but it is not
27
being used in regular project reporting. In terms of coverage, some FGD respondents
were of the view that government officials-other than those who are part of WLGsshould have been given a chance to participate as this could help build a better rapport
with them and earn their support on womens issues.
Cluster
CENTRAL PUNJAB
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
20.8%
79.2%
100%
25%
75%
100%
100%
100%
78.6%
100%
CENTRAL-UPPER
SINDH
Total
Total
50%
KHYBER PAKHTUN
KHWA
LOWER SINDH
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
UPPER PUNJAB
Others
21.4%
Survey data also shows that the awareness of district CACs and Aurat Foundations
work is lower among junior level NGO employees compared to senior ones as
depicted in tables below.
28
Table 8: Awareness about Citizens Action Committee: Comparison between Senior and
other NGO Staff in WLGs
Position Held
Are you aware of a Citizen Action
Committee in your district?
Yes
Senior
Management
No
Total
Others
Total
75.0%
68.2%
69.6%
25.0%
31.8%
30.4%
100%
100%
100%
Table 9: Awareness about Aurat Foundations Work: Comparison between Senior and other
NGO Staff in WLGs
Respondents
How aware would you say you are about
AFs work?
Well Aware
Senior
Management
Moderately Aware
Total
41.7%
32.6%
34.5%
58.3%
62.8%
61.8%
4.7%
3.6%
100%
100%
Unaware
Total
Others
100%
In what looks like a logical continuation of greater awareness of partners, there was a
higher percentage among women leaders at senior positions rating their trust in Aurat
Foundation as high compared to those at mid-level and junior positions.
Table 10: Level of Trust in Aurat Foundation: Comparison between Senior and other NGO
Staff in WLGs
Respondents
How would you rate your trust in
AF?
High
Moderate
Senior
Management
Total
42.9%
46.3%
41.7%
54.8%
51.9%
2.4%
1.9%
100%
100%
Not Sure
Total
Others
58.3%
100%
Targets with regard to producing posters on gender mainstreaming have been met.
However, there is no communication strategy under which such material is being
produced. That does not necessarily reflect negatively on the quality of the products.
However, proper strategy could have provided some rationale for using posters in place
of other possible means of rallying messages. All awareness raising work needs to be
monitored and evaluated like other project activities to gauge the results on peoples
knowledge and perception. In this context he survey finding about awareness of
29
As mentioned earlier in the report, just 17.8% of respondents said they were aware of fundamental rights in the
constitution to a great extent. 66% were reportedly aware of them to some extent, close to 10% said they
were not aware at all, and the remaining were not sure.
30
31
4.
The latest risk assessment produced by the implementing partner highlights some
pertinent issues but does not articulate the risks and mitigation measures very clearly. For
example, the statement, lack of coordination and capacity within government agencies
and other actors at federal and provincial levels, is so broad that it loses meaning. Who
are the actors? Can all actors, governmental and non-governmental be expected to have
coordination on every issue? It would help more if the precise nature of the risk were
articulated. Maybe the issue being discussed pertains to vertical programmes on gender
and womens rights running in isolation to provincial governments initiatives in that area.
We do not know unless the location of that risk is identified. Secondly, the addition of the
phrase capacity amounts to importing a new and a qualitatively different risk into the
framework. Is lack of coordination a result of inadequate capacity or could there be other
factors? Again, the second statement referring to a sharp political divide does not
pinpoint a risk as political divides on controversial issues are part and parcel of democratic
politics. Some mitigation measures mentioned under lack of political will to continue with
local government system make a lot of sense since they seem to be based on a good
understanding of maintaining vertical linkages in advocacy and lobbying work. To extend
this line of argument, it would also be pertinent to look for sources of risks within partners
at the grassroots level, for example the fact that vast numbers of them according to the
sample survey with WLG do not want the next local body elections held on political party
basis. The risk assessment as it stands now is reproduced below.
Nature of risk
Mitigation
Imp.
Prob
.
Lack of coordination
and capacity within
government agencies
and other actors at
federal and provincial
levels.
Med.
Med.
(4)
(3)
32
High.
Med.
(9)
(5)
High
Low
(9)
(3)
33
5. Recommendations
In the light of evaluation findings, we finally present a set of general and cross-cutting
recommendations followed by recommendations for the four activity clusters.
Suggestions put forward by CAC and WLG coordinators where backed by evaluation
findings have also been included.
General Recommendations
1. Project LFA should be revised to make sure activities, outcomes, purpose and
goal are logically linked. An additional layer of outputs may be included to
capture immediate results. Concepts and terms such as empowerment and
marginalized women should be assigned operational definitions. Indicators
need to capture both qualitative and quantitative aspects of results and
activities. WLGs and CACs need to have greater clarity on all project objectives
as distinct from activities.
2. Project monitoring needs to become more results-oriented rather than just
reporting the number of activities undertaken. Staffing needs for monitoring and
documentation should be addressed immediately.
3. Data on processes and results should be disaggregated by districts as a means
to identifying variation across regions.
4. Survey data reveal KP Province to be behind others in terms of participation of
WLG members in activities and awareness of rights issues. Future planning
should make sure corrective measures are adopted to bring it par with better
performing regions, such as Southern Punjab.
5. CACs and WLGs should be provided with easy-to-use monitoring checklists to
document both quantitative and qualitative aspects of their work, such as nature
of womens participation in activities.
6. Development of training manuals and participants folders or work books should
be a standard requirement for all capacity building workshops.
7. A sustainability plan should be put in place and communicated with WLGs and
CACs.
8. OGB needs to make sure that there are strong linkages between RHV and other
initiatives, such as We Can Campaign and projects in disaster management,
climate change and education.
9. Both OGB and the implementing partner need to increase the frequency of field
visits as a means to motivating activists on the ground and to ensure effective
monitoring.
10. Projects risks assessment should be made more precise in terms of locating the
sources of risks and identifying mitigation measures.
34
35
2. Among NGO employees who are members of WLGs, the junior ones require more
hand-holding and greater awareness of RHV.
3. OGB partners in other programme areas should be enlisted to actively work on
raising womens voice in line with RHV objectives.
36
37
Annexure
Time
9:30-10:15
4:45-5:15
10:15-12:00
12:00-1:00
1:00-2:00
2:00-2:30
2:30-4:00
4:00-4:45
Introduction
10-00-10:30
10:30-11:30
Appreciate Inquiry
11:30-1:00
Lunch
1:00-2:00
2:00-3:30
Recommendations
3:30-4:00
Fill out Section A before you call up the respondent. Please write appropriate codes
provided with the interviewees list.
SECTION A : IDENTIFICATION
A01
Date
_______________
A02
District
____________________
Code ____
____
A03
Cluster
____________________
Code ____
____
A04
Province
____________________
Code ____
A04
____________________
Signature
____________________
When you call tell the respondent: I am collecting information to review the work done
by Aurat Foundation in partnership with an international NGO Oxfam in their district.
We also want to see how we can improve our work in future. I have got a questionnaire
now and will need about 10-15 minutes of your time. Can you spare time for us please?
Say you will begin by asking some questions about the respondents work, education
level and background. Ask B01
B01
______________________________
B02
B03
1
2
3
4
5
B04
1
2
3
4
5
6
B05
Married
Never Married
Divorced
Widow/Widower
Other (Please Specify) _____________
What is your mother tongue?
Balochi
Brahvi
Hindko
Lasi
Punjabi
Pushto
7
8
9
10
Seraiki
Sindhi
Urdu
Other (Please Specify)
______________________________
Muslim
2
3
4
Christian
Hindu
Ahmadi
5
6
7
Bahai
Sikh
Other (Please Specify)
_____________
B06 What is your main profession? (Do not read out options. If the answer is school
teacher or college teacher, ask if its a private or a government school)
9
10
11
12
13
14
B07. What was the highest education level you completed (in number of years)?
______________________ (Do not write the name of the degree. Write 10 for
matric, 12 for FA and so on. Write 0 if the interviewee
has had no formal education)
B08. How often do you use the Internet? (Read out options)
1. Regularly
2. Occasionally
3. Never
B09. How often do you read a newspaper? (Read out options)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Daily
Few times a week
Once a week
Occasionally
Never
Tell the respondent: We would now be interested in getting your views about
some important issues related to womens rights and democratic governance.
SECTION C: Knowledge and Perceptions about Womens Rights & Democratic
Governance
C01
1
2
3
Do you think there are laws in Pakistan, which discriminate against women?
(Read out options)
Yes
No
Do not know
C02
C03
1
2
3
C04
_____________________________
Do not know
All laws that discriminate against women should be repealed. Do you agree
with the statement? (Read out options)
Agree
Disagree
Neither Agree nor Disagree
Have you heard about the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)?
1. Yes
2. No
C05. There is an opinion that minimum legal age at marriage for girls should be no
less than 18 years. Do you agree with the statement? (Read out
options)
1. Agree
2. Disagree
3. Not Sure
C06. How familiar would you say you are with the Fundamental Rights given in the
Constitution of Pakistan? (Read out options)
1.
2.
3.
4.
To a great extent
To some extent
Not at all
Cannot Say
C07. Are you aware of the new law called, Protection against Harassment at
Workplace Act, 2010?
the
1. Yes
2. No
(If the answer is Yes, ask C08. Otherwise skip to C09)
C08. How optimistic are you that this law can be fully implemented in your district?
(Read out options)
1. To a great extent
2. To some extent
Good
Moderate
3
4
Poor
Not Sure
C10. To what extent would you say had elected representatives in their last tenure
under the local government system responded to womens development needs in your
district? (Read out options)
1. To a great extent
2. To some extent
3. Not at all
4. Not Sure
C11. How would you like next local body elections held? (Read out options)
1. On Political Party Basis
2. Non-Party Basis
C12
1
2
3
Which of the following would you trust more for seeking justice? (Read out
options)
Jirga/Panchayat
Formal Courts
Neither of these
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
ANP
Jamat-e-Islami
JUI (Fazlur Rehman)
Jamhori Watan Party
MQM
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
PML (N)
PML (Q)
PML (F)
PPP
PPP (Sherpao)
National Party
Tehreek-e-Insaf
13. Other_______,
C.15. Do you intend to run for a public office in future?
1. Yes
2. No
3. Cannot Say
Tell the respondent: We are now moving on to the last section where we
would like to understand your experiences with Aurat Foundation and
get your feedback and recommendations, which will help us in the
future.
D02. Are you aware of a Citizens Action Committee or CAC in your district?
1. Yes
2. No
(If the answer is Yes, ask D03. Otherwise move on to D04)
D03. Are you a member of CAC yourself?
1. Yes
2. No
D04. How would you rate CACs role in helping protect womens rights in your district?
(Read out options)
1
2
Good
Moderate
3
4
Poor
Do not know
D05. Are you aware of any campaign run in your district for helping women acquire
computerized national identity cards? (Read out options)
1. Yes
2. No
3. Not Sure
2._________________________________________________________
3._________________________________________________________
D08. Have you had a chance to participate in any training event organized by Aurat
Foundation in the past two years?
1. Yes
2. No
(If the answer is Yes, ask D09. Otherwise move on to D10 now)
D09. Where would you rate your satisfaction level with the training event(s) your
participated in? (Read out options)
1. Satisfied
2. Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
3. Dissatisfied
4. Not Sure
D10. How aware would you say you are about the work Aurat Foundation does?
(Read out options)
1
2
Well Aware
Moderately Aware
Unaware
(If the answer is 1 or 2 ask D11. And if the answer is 3, skip D11 and ask D12 now)
D11. How would you rate your level of trust in Aurat Foundation? (Read out options)
1
2
High
Moderate
3
4
Low
Not Sure
1. Yes
2. No
(If the answer is Yes, ask D13. Otherwise move on to D14 now)
4. Not so Informative
5. Not informative at all
D14. What are the three most pressing issues in your district that you think NGOs
need to work on? (Ask the respondent to be brief).
1__________________________________________________________________
2__________________________________________________________________
3___________________________________________________________________
Ask the respondent if she has been a councilor or an elected member in the local
government. If the answer is Yes, administer Section E. Also ask the respondent or
check the answer to B06 to see if she is an NGO employee. If she is, administer Section
F. If the respondent has neither been a councilor nor is she an NGO employee, close the
interview by reading out the passage in the box below.
CLOSING WORDS: We are extremely thankful for your time and support. The
information and views you have shared with us are very important and will
help us with our work a lot. Thanks again.
3. District
3. Do not know
Education
Finance
Health
Literacy
Municipal Services
F.
G.
H.
I.
Public Safety
Works & Services
Justice
Other___________________________
(Specify)
E04. Did you have a chance to table any resolution in the council/assembly on
womens rights during your tenure?
1. Yes
2. No
3. Not Sure
E05. Would you say as a female councilor you enjoyed equal rights with your male
counterparts i.e. male councilors?
1. Yes
2. No
3. Not Sure
E06. Are you satisfied with the functioning of ongoing CCB projects in your district?
1. Yes
2. No
3. Not Sure
F02.
_________________________________________(Specify)
F03. How long have you held this position?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Four years or so
6. Five years or more
7. Other__________________________
(Specify)
F04. To what level would you say you are involved in making important
your organisation? (Read out options)
1. High
2. Moderate
F05.
decisions
in
3. Low
4. Not Sure
Yes
No
Not Sure
Cluster
CENTRAL PUNJAB
Frequency
KHYBER PAKHTUN
KHWA
LOWER SINDH
Percent
35
13.8
27
10.7
32
12.6
SOUTHERN PUNJAB
71
28.1
UPPER PUNJAB
46
18.2
CENTRAL-UPPER SINDH
39
15.4
250
100
Total
Frequency
Missing
Total
Percent
18 to 24
17
6.8
25 to 29
34
13.6
30 to 34
46
18.4
35 to 39
37
14.8
40 to 44
41
16.4
45 to 49
38
15.2
50 to 54
22
8.8
55 and
Above
Total
15
6.0
250
100
System
3
253
CENTRAL
PUNJAB
Age Categories
18 to 24
KHYBER
PAKHTUN
KHWA
LOWER
SINDH
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
UPPER
PUNJAB
CENTRALUPPER SINDH
Total
8.6%
3.7%
3.1%
8.6%
2.3%
10.3%
6.8%
25 to 29
14.3%
14.8%
9.4%
18.6%
6.8%
15.4%
13.6%
30 to 34
14.3%
18.5%
18.8%
24.3%
11.4%
20.5%
18.4%
35 to 39
14.3%
14.8%
15.6%
14.3%
13.6%
15.4%
14.8%
40 to 44
14.3%
18.5%
31.3%
12.9%
18.2%
10.3%
16.4%
45 to 49
11.4%
18.5%
3.1%
14.3%
25.0%
17.9%
15.2%
50 to 54
5.7%
7.4%
15.6%
4.3%
13.6%
10.3%
8.8%
17.1%
3.7%
3.1%
2.9%
9.1%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
55 and
Above
Total
Marital Status
Frequency
Married
Never
Married
Divorced
Widow or
Widower
Total
Percent
163
64.4
74
29.2
1.2
13
5.1
253
100
Religion
Frequency
Muslim
Christian
Bahai
Total
Percent
247
98.8
.8
.4
250
100
6.0%
100%
100%
Cluster
KHYBER
PAKHTUN
KHWA
CENTRAL
PUNJAB
Profession
Government
Servant other than
Teacher
School Teacher
(Government)
8.6%
LOWER
SINDH
18.5%
5.7%
College Teacher
(Government)
School Teacher
Private
College Teacher
Private
NGO Employee
Doctor
14.3%
10.3%
10.4%
3.1%
1.4%
4.3%
12.8%
4.4%
4.3%
2.6%
2.0%
4.3%
15.4%
7.2%
2.6%
.4%
6.5%
12.8%
16.8%
8.7%
2.6%
4.8%
2.2%
2.6%
2.0%
2.6%
2.8%
18.5%
21.9%
11.4%
7.4%
3.1%
7.4%
25.4%
6.3%
4.2%
6.3%
8.5%
Journalist
Home based
Worker
Housewife
5.6%
1.4%
1.4%
Business Person
Total
8.7%
11.4%
11.4%
CENTRALUPPER SINDH
11.3%
3.1%
3.7%
UPPER
PUNJAB
6.3%
6.3%
Lady Health
Worker
Lady Health Visitor
Lawyer
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
3.1%
4.8%
2.2%
2.6%
1.4%
5.7%
1.2%
.8%
2.2%
1.2%
11.4%
33.3%
34.4%
8.5%
21.7%
28.2%
20.4%
Student
5.7%
3.7%
3.1%
4.2%
4.3%
2.6%
4.0%
Other
2.9%
7.4%
4.2%
4.3%
3.1%
22.5%
26.1%
2.6%
13.6%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Social Worker
(Volunteer)
Total
11.4%
100%
100%
Educational Level
Up to Middle
Frequency
19
7.6
Matriculation
43
17.2
Intermediate
46
18.4
Graduate
57
22.8
85
34.0
250
100
Master's and
Higher
Total
Percent
3.2%
Cluster
Education Categories
Up to Middle
CENTRAL
PUNJAB
KHYBER
PAKHTUN
KHWA
LOWER
SINDH
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
UPPER
PUNJAB
CENTRALUPPER SINDH
Total
3.7%
15.6%
2.8%
15.2%
10.3%
7.6%
Matriculation
14.3%
44.4%
3.1%
15.5%
21.7%
10.3%
17.2%
Intermediate
22.9%
29.6%
3.1%
21.1%
21.7%
10.3%
18.4%
Graduate
22.9%
18.5%
28.1%
23.9%
21.7%
20.5%
22.8%
Master's and
Higher
40.0%
3.7%
50.0%
36.6%
19.6%
48.7%
34.0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Total
Cluster
Newspaper Reading
Daily
Few Times a
week
Once a week
Occasionally
Never
Total
CENTRAL
PUNJAB
KHYBER
PAKHTUN
KHWA
LOWER
SINDH
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
UPPER
PUNJAB
Total
48.6%
14.8%
53.1%
50.7%
40.0%
39.5%
43.1%
11.4%
3.7%
9.4%
8.5%
24.4%
18.4%
12.9%
2.9%
14.8%
12.5%
4.2%
13.3%
2.6%
7.7%
34.3%
59.3%
15.6%
25.4%
17.8%
26.3%
27.8%
2.9%
7.4%
9.4%
11.3%
4.4%
13.2%
8.5%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Regularly
CENTRAL
PUNJAB
KHYBER
PAKHTUN KHWA
LOWER SINDH
SOUTHERN
PUNJAB
UPPER PUNJAB
CENTRALUPPER SINDH
Total
CENTRALUPPER SINDH
Occasionally
Never
Total
11.4%
31.4%
57.1%
100%
7.4%
18.5%
74.1%
100%
21.9%
21.9%
56.3%
100%
15.5%
28.2%
56.3%
100%
13.3%
26.7%
60.0%
100%
12.8%
17.9%
69.2%
100%
14.1%
24.9%
61.0%
100%